After being a Lord of the Rings fan for many years, I was absolutely shocked when I read the appendices and discovered that while Tolkien portrays the stories as being in English, they are done so only for our benefit. The description he gave about how the term "Hobbit" came from "Holbytla", similar to "Hole builder" only works in English. In Westron, Hobbits are called "Kuduk" coming from "Kûd-dûkan". In fact, Tolkien styles the origin of the stories as a collection of old texts that he found and translated into English. The very same texts that Bilbo and Frodo wrote. I found that amazing.

@roddo1955

11 ай бұрын

I liked that as well. Adds to the realism. As if it really is a transcribed ancient body of work.

@itsjudemydude

6 ай бұрын

Yes! It's especially fun because many of the character's names are also "translated" into more English-sounding names with the same meanings and/or evoking similar vibes in English. A fun example is Merry, whose full english name is Meriadoc Brandybuck. But in Westron, the language the Hobbits would've spoken themselves, his real name is described as _Kalimac Brandagamba._ Kalimac is shortened to Kali, which means something like "happy," .... or "merry." It's a literal translation. Another is Pippin. The name "Peregrin" in English is derived from the latin word "peregrinus," a Latin word meaning "pilgrim." But in Westron, he's called _Razanur,_ derived from the words "raza" (stranger) and "razan" (foreigh), evoking the same meaning. The name Samwise Gamgee in Westron is _Banazir Galbasi,_ with "Banazir" meaning something like "simple" or "half-wise." Likewise, "Samwise" is a modernization of the ancient English _samwis,_ which means the very same thing.

@InGrindWeCrust2010

5 ай бұрын

​@@itsjudemydudeThat's awesome! Why was Pippin called stranger/foreign? Weren't they all from the Shire since forever?

@yxx_chris_xxy

5 ай бұрын

@@InGrindWeCrust2010 I guess the connotation is with being enterprising. Pilgrim may be the literal root, but it is also meant to be read as traveller/wanderer.

@SH19922x

2 ай бұрын

Tolkien really was a wanker.

LOTR isn't fantasy. It's the history of an alternate universe. Tolkien had a secret window into it and rather than just being amused he decided to share it with everyone. Edit: I'm pretty fed up with all the people who think I'm serious. Whoosh

@rikk319

Жыл бұрын

It could simply be viewed as that, for Tolkien portrayed it that way. But...for all the modern fantasy works that come after it, as more or less the children of LotR, Tolkien's work can rightly also be described as proto-fantasy. I was lucky enough to come upon Tolkien's works and Dungeons & Dragons at about the same time, in the 1970s, and spending a lifetime of reading fantasy and roleplaying has shown just how integral Tolkien's creations are to the modern fantasy genre--whether novels, movies, tabletop games, or videogames.

@FreedomAndPeaceOnly

Жыл бұрын

There is a lot of "Meme magic" at hand here too which exposes realworld parallels. ° Saruman was a traitor. ° One of his titles "Saruman of many colors" and he brought Orcs in ° The "Rainbow croud" (of many colors) is bringing people into Europe who will never be good and always do damage until they are gone again

@rikk319

Жыл бұрын

@@FreedomAndPeaceOnly Um, no. Tolkien made it clear he wasn't racist or against multi-ethnicity or immigrants: 1. Human-elf couples were rare, but always special and revered. 2. The Rohirrim were welcomed into Gondorian territory, and even given their land. 3. Hobbits were deeded their land in what was once Arnor by King Elessar. 4. Theoden's wife was Gondorian. 5. Faramir and Eowyn renewed that bond. 6. The supposed 'lesser' humans (Rohirrim) were shown to be more passionate and vital, compared to the staid, set-in-their-ways Gondorians, who were descended from Numenorians. 7. Elves were welcomed into Ithilien. 8. Dwarves were welcomed into the Glittering Caves. 9. Tolkien himself rejected anti-semitism loudly in a letter to Nazis who sought to use his writing as pro-Aryan prior to WW2. Trying a weak connection between Saruman of Many Colors and "the rainbow crowd" just makes you look ignorant and hateful. The Fellowship was a multi-racial group, after all.

@EJLeas

Жыл бұрын

As

@dinkywinky2860

Жыл бұрын

@@rikk319 He also states very clearly that he was no fan of allegory. The Lord of The Rings is a story that means itself. He is not making allusions to world war 2, racism or any politics. He is telling a story.

Pippin accidentally facetiming Sauron is one of those details that I wish they had shown in the movie

@The_Sloth_Guy

3 ай бұрын

It is?

@thevoicestoldmetoagain4627

2 ай бұрын

Well they sorta did. They showed that the connection was made and that Sauron saw Pippen. Might not have specifically sais they saw each other. But it did happen.

@bazookajoe7633

2 ай бұрын

😂

@IsaAlsup

2 ай бұрын

I agree, and also Aragorn’s confrontation with Sauron felt too fleeting in the film.

@micahmeowman

2 ай бұрын

Yeah his funny faces at Sauron are there lol.

The moment Frodo says he will take the Ring gives me chills every time. Doesn't matter if I'm reading the book or watching the movies, it's just such a powerful moment.

@tom-vf1xv

Жыл бұрын

There's many chill/heart wrenching and warming moments in the film even after 15 rewatches. it truly is a masterpiece

@wrightsong

11 ай бұрын

What about when he decides to take the ring for himself?

@jackstrawful

10 ай бұрын

@@wrightsong This is what proves Tolkien's point about the virtue of showing pity, rather than hatred. In Fellowship, when Gandalf tells Frodo they are being followed by Gollum, Frodo wonders why they don't just kill him. Gandalf explains that he should not be killed, but pitied, because one never knows what depths they themselves might fall to and so should not be so quick to judge others, and that Gollum has some role to play. In the end, Frodo choosing to take the ring for himself is what reveals that role - if Frodo had not shown pity and spared Gollum, then Gollum wouldn't have been around to force the ring away from Frodo and fall with it into Mt Doom. Tolkien has said that the original kernel of an idea for the entire story was that he wanted to make that point about pity.

@SA80TAGE

9 ай бұрын

I don't like that it's not strictly Frodo's own choice in the book. It diminishes all his suffering and heroics if it's not through his own choice.... less of a hero and more a slave to fate.

@rocketGimbal

7 ай бұрын

@@SA80TAGE He is a hero precisely because he fulfills the (fatal) fate to bear the ring to doom. While it is almost certainly Eru's urging that is that voice in his head, the description of someone else speaking through him while he only longs to stay put is more a literary device to describe the act of being brave. Brave people are not brave because they never have doubts, they are brave because they do what they must despite them. It is not like Frodo is possessed here and only used as a mouthpiece, he just really doesn't want to die but knows that he has to for the fate of the world. Thus he fights it and it feels like an out-of-body experience ultimately because of the vast inner turmoil.

Something I love about the deeper lore of Middle Earth is that Morgoth didn't originally want to destroy or corrupt anything. He just wanted to genuinely create stuff from nothing like Eru did, and got mad that he couldn't. Hence that great quote from Eru about "Even in my possible defeat I will have won because you are proving my own creations to be great by using them to your own ends"

@CantusTropus

Жыл бұрын

The issue is that wanting to do that IS itself an extremely grave sin, for it is the desire to be God, a refusal to accept or worship Him as Creator. In fact, it's about the most serious sin possible.

@gib59er56

Жыл бұрын

@@CantusTropus I understand Tolkien and you by the way you describe Morgoth`s intent. I am in agreement with you basically 99%. Tolkien was a devout Catholic, I was born and Baptised Catholic, and by 11 I refused to go to church, religion class, basically figured out that organized Religion is just as real as Middle Earth. You may disagree. vMorgoth is Satan. He wants his own theme in the Music of the Ainur. Eru shuts him down. Thus he begins his fall. And after he can`t get the power he craves he goes berserk basically. Aule in his own way rebels by making the Dwarves before all other beings . Yet he is humble and he bows and asks if he must destroy them, and takes up his hammer, and Eru sees that the Dwarves cower and already have a free will. They must wait until the Firstborn are come. I also always found it odd that both Sauron and Saruman were Maiar of Aule. I think I lost my thread of thought!! LOL Take care. And please dont think I do not believe in God. I do and ask him for guidance every day. Just not in a Church. On a similar topic, my Grandfather was to go to Seminar and become a priest but then WWII broke and he became a Marine. He was at Guadalcanal, and I believe Tarawa as well. He came home and that dream vanished . I cannot imagine the horrors he saw there.

@cbrreezzyy69

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, but the reason he wanted to create, was so he could in turn dominate and rule over his creations lol

@RSAgility

Жыл бұрын

They call Eru "the flame eternal" for a reason...that line was fire and morgoth is literally: forevermad

@praetorian3902

Жыл бұрын

​@@CantusTropus Anybody who wants to be worshipped is an arrogant twat, God or not. Put yourself in the shoes of someone that just created something and is right now looking at their creation in front of them and pondering the question "so, am I gonna tell them to worship me or not?" and you'll get it. I don't wanna be worshipped, even if there were thousands that wanted I would say "no, go home". Because I'm not an insecure idiot, and neither is God. The top people at the medieval catholic church that made up this crap were egomaniacal and insecure and you seem to believe all their crap. Lying is easy, and these people had a control agenda make no mistake. In their minds the church was never about saving your soul, it was all about business - making money and gaining more power, country after country. Secure people do not seek control over others. Besides this worship thing conflicts with God loves you. You can't love someone you actively want to worship you. Don't spend the rest of your life believing in such an idiot God. God is way better than what the church told people (by inserting its made up bullshit passages in certain parts of the Bible, modifying other passages and outright deleting a good chunk like Jesus' life. Most of his life is missing I wonder why, it's not like he had anything more to teach us right - that was sarcasm).

The fact Sauron tortured or at least spoke to Gollum face to face is quite possible, probable even. I would imagine Sauron would want to be sure he knew everything Gollum knew. After all it was Gollum who knew most about the rings whereabouts and Sauron would not want to risk not finding out everything.

@JervisGermane

Жыл бұрын

Nor would he want messages going back and forth. He wouldn't want to risk the information getting out to anyone else or being misinterpreted

@bobdole7451

Жыл бұрын

Plus, I'm sure Sauron would personally want to inflict punishment on the person who had been hiding his ring for hundreds of years

@artugert

Жыл бұрын

When I read the book, I always just assumed that he did see him in person. I thought it was implied by what he said. I didn't even realize there was any question of that.

@Chibispore

Жыл бұрын

Gollum also mentions Sauron has four fingers on his hand, which is another point that he saw him face to face, unless that fact is common knowledge to most people in-universe

@MerkhVision

Жыл бұрын

@@Chibispore right, that exact point is mentioned in this video lol did u comment before getting to that part or did u just miss it lol

Here a small fun fact: In the german version Tolkien made the choice to NOT name elves Elfen (like the translation would be) but Elben (while Tolkien didn't translate the book himself, he was in contact with the translator; originally he wanted Alb but there was already an author who did this out of the same reasons about a century earlier who chose Elb). He did this to further differentiate them in name too from the elves from e.g. Peter Pan.

@m.aj11

Жыл бұрын

The same thing happened in the Sebian translation of the book: Vilenjak, vila(pl. vilenjaci, vile) is the word that denotes fairies as we know them from mythologies and fairytales, but the translator used new and unusual variation of the word- Vilovnjak, Vilovnjaci to stay true to the Tolkien's way of writing. Just brilliant! Also, the translation of the ring poem is nothing short of a masterpiece!

@HansWurst1569

Жыл бұрын

Funny, in dutch it would have the same meaning as in german but they just kept the transaltion litteral

@PhattyBolger

Жыл бұрын

The first versions of his books got "corrected" by the publisher and things like "Elven" were changed to "Elfin"- this drove him mad.

@markbritton6798

9 ай бұрын

Tolkien wrote his books specifically for the English people's, who cares what people translate it to, it was written in English for the English people, sort of like how Muslims claim their qu,ran can only be understood if you can read Aramaic. It's the same thing, who cares about German or any other translation when we have the true word's of Tolkien himself?

@Khagrim

9 ай бұрын

​@@markbritton6798 how you missed the part that Tolkien worked with a German translator is beyond me. Just goes to show how your gatekeeping is stupid and narrow-minded.

For me, I definitely understand how the Undying Lands would be a perfect place for the Ringbearers to heal. In my own life, after experiencing traumatic events, my biggest desire was always for life to just pause for a bit. For time to freeze and everything to stop changing for a while, so that I could have my chance to breathe and process what I had gone through before getting back on the ladder - before having to confront the consequences of whatever had just happened. I expect it was, as with much of his work, heavily influenced by his traumatic experiences in the First World War, and the desire for respite from the terrors of a rapidly changing and increasingly violent world. For Bilbo, Frodo, and Sam, who had lived through such traumatic events as the War of the Ring, or the held the malice of Sauron around their neck for so long, I can imagine a time in an unchanging land of eternal peace, surrounded by music and laughter and light, would have been the most perfect healing they could have ever wished for - a spiritual cleansing. A refuge from the world, and a peace that their own minds would have been unable to provide. I think it's just beautiful.

@hurricanebubbles

11 ай бұрын

My question though, is would the half year be a Hobbit year or an Elven year? Cuz an Elven year as even said here is a ridiculous amount longer.

@NottSaying

8 ай бұрын

​@@hurricanebubbles likely Elven, and that would mean that Samwise would be reunited with Frodo for a few Hobbit years before passing on, but that they would probably never see Legolas and Gimli.

You glanced over something in the council.Bilbo was the one who at first was saying that since he was responsible for finding the ring, it was up to him to destroy it. This to me is crucial as it is what compells Frodo our of care for Bilbo, his father figure to break the silence and find his courage.

@josesosa3337

10 ай бұрын

👍

Pretty sure established titles is a scam

@itsjeff367

23 күн бұрын

It definitely is

@Phoenix_of_Sun

3 күн бұрын

Its not so much a scam but more of an way overpriced gag gift

Some one probably mentioned this: in translations we use accents as cultural short cuts. The Scottish accent is used through out adaptions, translations, and Shakespeare as a cultural short hand for being a warrior (it is why romans speak Posh english, and the Spartans speak in a Scottish brogue). I believe that is why dwarves sound scottish in the common adaptation

@filthycasual8187

6 ай бұрын

Also, dwarves are awesome. So is the Scottish intonation. The two go together REALLY well.

@wildfire9280

6 ай бұрын

@@filthycasual8187 The films really did a lot for the representation of New Zealand *and* Scotland it seems.

@user-yk4wh9gs1g

4 ай бұрын

What are you talking about. Star wars has Huttanes, basic galactic, and many alien with ancient languages

@Wyrdsmythe007

4 ай бұрын

I am constantly amused by the fact that Romans always have an "English" accent in the movies. Wouldn't Italian be more appropriate? But in the modern era, we equate "Empire" with England. So... Cheers!😅😂🤣

@KororaPenguin

3 ай бұрын

And in the English translation I have of the roughly half known to survive of Menander's farce "The Shield", when one of Chaereas' friends takes on the guise of a foreign physician*, the translator gave the supposed foreigner a Scottish accent. * The plan was to take a miserly uncle down a few pegs by staging his brother's death to trick the miser into an embarrassing overreach.

Pippin: Hey can we stop and celebrate Christmas? Aragorn: We already did that. Pippin: We’ve had one yes, but what about 2nd Christmas?

@ericblievernicht9610

2 ай бұрын

That's easy, just convert from Protestant/Catholic to Eastern Orthodox and back again every year. 🙂

@Jet-ij9zc

2 ай бұрын

What about camper's Christmas?

@BenjaminBrienen

2 ай бұрын

The Netherlands has December 5, 6, 24, and 25 as christmas holidays.

@xanderpoortvliet7976

Ай бұрын

@@BenjaminBrienen Wrong first 2 days are for the birthday of sinterklaas nothing to do with Christmas

@martijn0797

15 күн бұрын

Only 5 dec is sinterklaas.. the 6th has no meaning

Another reason that the Arkenstone cannot be a Silmaril (at least to me) is that it was never recognize as such by the elves. At it's discovery, and though it's subsequent history, there were still in Middle Earth many elves (Galadriel in particular for the elves, plus Saruman, Gandalf, etc.) who had lived before the destruction of the Two Trees and had seen the Silmarils before Morgoth stole them. The idea that a Silmaril could re-surface and be unrecognized by these Elves (and most other elves) is to me absurd.

@ianwestc

Жыл бұрын

If Bilbo popped up in the elvenking's camp and was like "hey, here's a Silmaril," he would have given Thranduil a heart attack. The dude would NOT have been willing to trade it back to the dwarves in exchange for a share of the treasure too.

@AlyssMa7rin

Жыл бұрын

@@ianwestc Thranduil’s body literally burns away in the fire of his surprise, and his spirit is sent to Mandos. Feanor: “How did you end up here?” Thranduil: “I beheld a Silmaril, and such was my shock that my spirit fled my body.”

@outcastwayne

Жыл бұрын

I could easily see the magma/lava that eventually cooled to where the dwarves of the lonely mountain dug it up warped the gem, and then they cut it, making it far less than what it once was. But that is to stretch to fit the silmaril into the role

@ianwestc

Жыл бұрын

I usually feel that taking the same characters and same objects and making all your stories revolve around them is truly limiting. Having the Arkenstone be a Silmaril just makes the world feel smaller and less interesting, because there are fewer things of consequence. It was a really bad decision to make all nine of the mainline Star Wars movies revolve around Skywalkers and Tattoine, etcetc, the "oh I know that name!" and "oh we've been here before" gives a momentary rush, but after that, those decisions really degrade your wider universe. Not only does the Arkenstone being a Silmaril not make much sense, but it would really hurt both stories. It's not the decision Tolkien made, and fans are the better for it.

@coreybentsen7794

Жыл бұрын

Morgoth stole more Jewels than the Silmarils...I've always liked to think the Arkenstone was one of them

The one about the Undying Lands is indeed bittersweet. I wasn't really sure about the specifics on that one, but I think it's more poignant and beautiful that Frodo and Bilbo earned the privileged to be able to heal in peace before passing on. Just as beautiful and heartbreaking as Gandalf accomplished his mission and is now leaving the world in the hands of men to set up a new age. It's might seem sad, but it's not tragic. Everything has to end and that is not a bad thing.

I haven't read the books, but my favourite moments of Gimli's in the films is when he comes across as experienced and urbane. _"Give me your name, horse master, and i shall give you mine."_ There are only a few moments like these, but to me they convey a greater sense of wisdom than any other cast member.

@Half-CockedG

4 ай бұрын

i hate you movie only people smh

From what I understood, Frodo, Bilbo and the others didn't die after a short time in Valinor, because they stayed in Tor Elessea, an island near it. They lived "for a limited time", limited in the literal sense of the word: they didn't become immortal, but they could decide when to die, after a short or long length of time. So it is possible that they got to see each others again.

@mckenanbundy3578

8 ай бұрын

Yes, and Tolkien’s unpublished epilogue implies that Samwise will see Frodo again. I disagree with that part of this video.

@nordlyselsker

8 ай бұрын

Tol Eressëa, not Tor Elessea.

@Durakken

8 ай бұрын

Actually, while I didn't know much of the undying lands, the explanation for why Bilbo and Frodo go there is because they have become immortal, in the sense that they will not naturally die, but can be killed, and find their world a poor fit, longing for the simplicity but never being able to return and there was no place else for them. That's why they go there and why they are able to meet the others later

@argon2423

7 ай бұрын

@@Durakken You do not become immortal, simply by entering the Undying Lands. That is just not how that works. The reason as to why Frodo, Sam and Bilbo were allowed to go to Valinor, was due to them having beared the One Ring, and especially Frodo, having suffered greatly. They, in time, would eventually die like every mortal and whose spirits would eventually escape the circles of the world.

@Durakken

7 ай бұрын

@argon2423 I didn't say they went to the undying lands and became immortal. If I had, I probably should rewatch the video where it explicitly says that does not happen. What I was pointing at is that ring barers have their lives extended. Hobbits, from what I remember, have very short lives, but smeagol has been alive for hundreds if not thousands of years. Likewise, Bilbo is, at the very least, aging much slower than normal, leaving us to conclude that while not immortal, ring baring Hobbits live very long lives

Little correction - Rumpelstiltskin is NOT a dwarf. Nor is he any kind of humanoid. He is a Schrat, a sort of... Germanic nature spirit. Think Kodamas from japanese folklore, or Leshen from slavic. Usually these are actually spirits that inhabit a constructed totem, rather than having their own body - that's also why Rumpelstiltskin can tear himself apart in the end of the story, he's literally a spirit inhabiting a wooden doll.

@WolfieDawn

6 ай бұрын

Woah. Thank you. You just blew my mind.

@montecristo1845

6 ай бұрын

That puts a whole new spin on why he wanted the Princess’s first-born child after helping her spin straw into gold for a third time. Maybe to obtain a body to possess? Yeesh! 😬

@udozocklein6023

5 ай бұрын

thats funny because afaik the mages in this lore are all half-gods and not just folklore stuff

@miltonbates6425

5 ай бұрын

Very interesting. That would explain his name, "Rumplestiltskin", which literally means "little rattle stilt", a stilt being a post or pole that provides support for a structure. So in the original, unwritten story, he likely began as a protective family totem (sort of like a domestic version of a "Palladium" or graven image...similar to the palladium of Pallas Athena). A bundle of sticks fashioned into a small humanoid-shaped figure, that became possessed by a trickster spirit, became noisome, and attempt to trick the mortals into providing him a suitable body to possess.

@kake1604

4 ай бұрын

actually, Rumpelstiltskin plays minecraft on his channel "Dream."

In terms of whether or not Tolkein is fantasy, he definitely re-defined the fantasy genre. These days, authors either write something inspired by tolkein's style, inspired by something that was inspired by tolkein's style, or if you want to get really different and break the mold, then you will write something that's inspired by tolkien's methodology and actually do the work to make your own historically inspired invented mythology.

This is a very, very good list. About Gollum and Sauron: In “The Unifinished Tales”, part 3, chapter IV, there’s a text by Tolkien explaining how Sauron, after torturing and questioning Gollum, lets him go because he senses something indomitable in him, and has Gollum tracked because he expected Gollum to lead him to the Ring. But his spies loses him. There follows something I’ll quote: “Now Sauron had never paid heed to the ‘halflings’, even if he had heard of them, and he did not yet know where their lands lay. From Gollum, even under pain, he could not get any clear account, both because Gollum indeed had no certain knowledge himself, and because what he knew he falsified. Ultimately indomitable he was, except by death, as Sauron guessed, both from his hafling nature, and from a cause which Sauron did not fully comprehend, being himself consumed by lust for the Ring. Then he became filled with a hatred of Sauron even greater than his terror, seeing in him truly his greatest enemy and rival. Thus it was that he dared to pretend that he believed that the land of the Halflings was near to the places where he had once dwelt beside the banks of the Gladden.” Since finding the Ring was paramount to Sauron, it makes sense that Sauron was personally involved in the questioning and torture of Gollum. It also story-wise makes Gollum a direct link between Frodo and Sauron. I suppose that Gollum also called Sauron “Master”, grovelled, begged and made promises, all the while keeping his true intentions locked away deep inside. There’s something interesting about Gollum being caught between Frodo and Sauron: Two poles, both using Gollum to their own ends, both being his competitors regarding the Ring, and therefore paths to his ruin, but being opposites regarding their methods and objectives.

Here’s one train of thought I enjoy as a fan of languages: A well know name of a river in Tolkien’s works River Running or “Running River”, translated into Norwegian: Rennende Elf. Put a few centuries on that it would probably become something like Rennendelf or perhaps even Rinnendelf. Perhaps morphing to Rivendel? Tolkien must have had quite some enjoyment with his knowledge of language.

@Emanon...

7 ай бұрын

What's Rivendell translated to in the books? In Danish its "Kløvedal" which is a lovely translation: The dale that was cloven / riven...

@john.premose

7 ай бұрын

​@@Emanon...yes I believe Rivendel means exactly what it sounds like: a riven dale.

@Emanon...

7 ай бұрын

@@john.premose haha. That makes sense 😁

@Monsteretrope

3 ай бұрын

Its "elv" not elf. So it fits even better :)

@ImpossibilitySpace

2 ай бұрын

​@@john.premosethis actually relates to the fact that Rivendell is an English translation of the "original" Westron text. Rivendell's Westron name is Karningul which roughly translates to "deep valley" which is the same as the Sindarin name Imladris.

i think the bickering in the Peter Jackson's council were a great way to show the malevole influence of the ring (because IT IS dificult to show how an object could be evil by itself). thanks for the video!

@dinkywinky2860

Жыл бұрын

I think it was probably the best way to put it to screen without spending an absurd amount of time explaining everything. The films really streamline a lot of the lore, they could have made an entire trilogy explaining the lore of the world which would need to be explained for audiences to understand how a ring is evil. They never really get into maiar or illuvitar or anything of that nature in the films, as interesting as all of the stuff is, it's not really relevant to the story being told. Those of us who already know the lore will find the story far more interesting because we know why things are happening, but most people just wanted to watch some movies and they were still given enough information to make it enjoyable.

@jameshannagan4256

Жыл бұрын

That is how I took it as well.

@dmgroberts5471

Жыл бұрын

There's some bickering in the book. Aragorn and Boromir essentially have a "bro-off" trying to establish who is more badass.

@Hellfire798760870

3 ай бұрын

​@@dmgroberts5471 And we know who wins that "bro-off"... Samwise, because Samwise is the best bro😂

@sbraypaynt

2 ай бұрын

The determination of Frodo choosing to do the right thing is far more interesting and humanitarian than “It’s God’s will”

Good video but I think another common misconception people have is that “pipe weed” is basically marijuana, when the appendix makes it pretty clear that it’s more like tobacco. Edit: To further rain on everyone’s parade, even if it was marijuana, whatever strain they were smoking must have been SUPER WEAK. We never see the Hobbits cough after inhaling and their eyes never get bloodshot.

@chainsofgames

Жыл бұрын

Let a man dream

@classiclife7204

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, one of the few forgivable things from Jackson. The fact is, for past 20 or so years, pot is more acceptable on screen than tobacco. Unless it's rare or ironic, smoking a cigarette is a good way to get an "R" rating. Plus, in the States, pot is mostly legal (minus the dumb Federal law against it).

@shinypooka

Жыл бұрын

It's literally called weed for short in the movies. It's funnier this way.

@wilhufftarkin8543

Жыл бұрын

@@classiclife7204 How can something be legal in individual states if there is a federal law against it? Im not from the US, so sorry for my ignorance.

@classiclife7204

Жыл бұрын

@@wilhufftarkin8543 It's the way they classify the substance. The Feds rate marijuana the same way as they rate heroin (highest danger), so it's treated that way. By the FEDS. Meanwhile, about 40 States or so treat it as mostly medicine (which it basically is). The USA needs to decide if the United States IS, or ARE, if you get me. State laws vs. Fed laws is bonkers and I certainly can't justify it.

So Deagol is his cousin...

@johnbraithwaite863

29 күн бұрын

Yes

I would like to defend the use of "cousin" in the case of Sméagol and Déagol: typically is assumed to be first cousins, but second cousins, third cousins etc. can all be covered under the umbrella "cousin". As you say in the video, since they are from a supersmall community everybody there is related, so calling somebody that is not direct family a cousin would probably be valid.

@deniseindoung4514

4 ай бұрын

This was my thought. If you're going to go as far as to say they were probably related, simply by nature of the enmeshed and sheltered community they most likely lived in, then cousins is the most likely relationship, simply because it's going to be the one that the highest number of the population shared. Of course there's also the likelihood of being related in more than one way, but cousin is the one you're going to fall back on.

On the note of number 2. There's far more to it, you'll notice that Tolkien says first that they will grow 'weary' sooner. This is the same word that Tolkien uses when describing Elves in Middle Earth. Tolkien is very particular with his words, and there's a meaning there. A mortal will find that all the other creatures hardly change over his life span. This is because the Undying Lands are static, they do not change. Elves, designed with their immortality in mind, do excellently in the Undying Lands, where things don't change. They grow 'weary' in Middle Earth because of how rapidly things change. Even long-lived Numenorean Kings were too short for them, and caused immense stress on those elves familiar with them. The first time that a man died among Elves they were confused, and incredibly hurt as they didn't understand what it meant. Similarly, mortals can't live in the Undying Lands without growing weary of nothing changing. The land is not meant for them, and they are to move beyond Arda. They need change to exist. This is also why mortals were not allowed in the Undying Lands. For while looking upon it would make a mortal always long to return, living there would cause Man to destroy it just for the sake of change. Though it is important to note that while the Ringbearers go to the undying lands, it doesn't tell how long it would take for their spirits to heal. Bilbo described himself as feeling stretched thin. This is because the ring does the same thing it did to the Ringwraiths, it bound his spirit to the world. The ringwraiths have no physical form, and must inhabit their robes because they are naught but spirit now, forcibly bound to remain in Arda despite being called to venture beyond as is the 'Doom' of Man. Who knows how long it would take for their spirits to be healed enough of the damage caused by the Ring for them to move on as they are supposed to.

@masync183

8 ай бұрын

this is basically the only mortal/immortal dichotomy ive seen that seemed like both sides were kinda good tbh. i get that not joining with eru or whatever probably sucks but immortals have eternity to learn how to cope with it and enjoy living. and dying and being mortal does suck but at least you get to, idk merge with god or something. usually one option is very clearly much better than the other but in this i could see how both an elf and a human could envy each other.

@Kayem237

8 ай бұрын

@@angelspawn9138 Indeed, as it really is a gift.

@guilhemnavarette6282

6 ай бұрын

@@masync183 "One option is very clearly better than the other" : Well, depending on whether you think as an elf or as a man, you could have your entire country sunken if you plan to get the other option

@wildfire9280

6 ай бұрын

@@angelspawn9138 Gift, no quotation marks.

@strawbbtarte

5 ай бұрын

Cool, can someone show me the way to the undying lands? Things change far too quickly in this world. Please and thank you

I think you made the issue with the two towers sound more simple then it was, Tolkien himself wasn't sure which two towers he meant, he changed his mind a few times. There wasn't a definitive answer. I can't express how happy I was the see my notification for this video. Miss your videos.

@saelind73

Жыл бұрын

True. But there is a good case to be made for Minas Morgul. www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/50166/j_r_r_tolkien/1588/the_two_towers#:~:text=II%20refer%20to%20Orthanc%20and,of%20Saruman%2C%20and%20Cirith%20Ungol.

@tolkienuntangled

Жыл бұрын

Correct. Right at the end of The Fellowship of the Ring, it is written: "The second part is called The Two Towers, since the events recounted in it are dominated by Orthanc, the citadel of Saruman, and the fortress of Minas Morgul that guards the secret entrance to Mordor." However in a 1954 letter that Tolkien wrote to his publisher, he told him: "I am not at all happy about the title The Two Towers. It must if there is any real reference in it to Vol. II refer to Orthanc and the Tower of Cirith Ungol. But since there is so much made of the basic opposition of the Dark Tower and Minas Tirith, that seems very misleading." So yeah, there are five different towers that The Two Towers could possibly be referring to. Confusing. Thanks to Saelind for the info.

@zimmerwald1915

Жыл бұрын

​@@tolkienuntangled Far be it from me to dismiss the Professor for nitpicking. . . but Minas Morgul and the Tower of Cirith Ungol are close by enough, and united enough in their purpose, in my view to be considered part of the same fortress/tower system, like, say, Narchost and Carchost. They both guard the pass of Cirith Ungol and their garrisons even engage in joint operations to that end, though Minas Morgul also guards a rather easier nearby pass through the Mountains of Shadow. Also, if we were supposed to consider the Tower of Cirith Ungol on its own, it really ought to have been given a fully Sindarin name :P

@yeahnaaa292

Жыл бұрын

@@zimmerwald1915 Your last paragraph demonstrates your depth of knowledge. It does however omit the paramount truth that JRRT passed well before he could bring definitive completion to not just this particularity of his mythos but sadly, to so much of magnum opus. Logical Fallacy.

@cm3.redeye42

Жыл бұрын

Huh, I didn't know that, that Tolkien himself wasn't entirely sure which two towers he himself was referring to. It's entirely possible that the name of the book came from his editor, too, as the LotR was originally just one massive manuscript, later broken into three, which I'm sure you know. For myself, I've legit always thot that "The Two Towers" being referred to were the towers of Barad Dur & Orthanc. Since the second book is where the whole Saruman part of the story takes off, & rly Orthanc became to Sauron a projection of his power deep into Middle Earth, & the two towers - & by extension their masters - were linked by their Palantiri, making them essentially a unified front against the good races organizing, etc. Just look at the chaos he (Saruman) wrought in Rohan & Edoras. Anyway, this comment got too long, but I'm gonna leave it. Cheers.

As far as the Elves being "unemotional", that is definitely not borne out in the writings. However, being immortal they did have a certain detachment or perspective not commonly found in mortal species. As Legolas comments in Fangorn, "This place is old, I feel young here as I have not felt since traveling with you children" (I may have the wording wrong but something to that effect). Which seems odd since both Aragon and Gimili were full adults till one realizes just how old Legolas was compared to either of them. I don't think this line made its way into the movie as in would have seemed very incongruent for Orlando Bloom to say that to Viggo Mortensen and John Rhy-Davies.

@DariusOfPersia

5 ай бұрын

The line sort of made it into the film, but it's just Legolas saying "This forest is old...very old. Full of memory, and anger."

@strawbbtarte

5 ай бұрын

@@DariusOfPersia kinda falls flat compared to the original unfortunately

@DariusOfPersia

5 ай бұрын

@@strawbbtarte Yeah, it does

@KororaPenguin

3 ай бұрын

Maybe the ears fooled some people. I also once ran across a bad Legomance fic that had Legolas going into a condition not unlike pon farr!

My two favorite misconceptions: 1. Isildur didn't defeat Sauron by cutting the Ring from his hand (as in the film). Gil-galad and Elendil first defeated Sauron in direct physical combat (both perishing in the act), *whereafter* Isildur cut the Ring from his hand as weregild for their deaths. Tolkien is very vague about the account, so I can understand the difficulty of portraying it in the film. But it's unfortunate that a lot of this kind of sheer epicness of the ancient past of Middle-Earth is lost in adaptation. The further you go back in ME history, the more incredible the feats of its participants. 2. The Common Tongue isn't English This one is obvious if you stop and think about it, but the vast majority of people just don't think about it. If this is a story in the ancient past of our world, clearly modern English can not possibly be the same as the Common Tongue of ME. So, technically what we are reading as The Lord of the Rings is a translation. (Some of the tidbits of actual Common Tongue words that Tolkien revealed are really strange, too. Very interesting.)

@Matt_History

5 ай бұрын

2 is actually up for serious debate. Texts in Sindarin, and Anudanic tend to at least have they're original structure and vocabulary provided in their portrayals, Westron doesn't have any of that. It lacks grammar, or a script, and was so underdeveloped Tolkien literally just gave up and inscribed Balin's Tomb in Moria by directly translating English into Cirth Runes

@nunkatsu

Күн бұрын

I always thought that the common tongue was supposed to be a metaphor for English, but not literal English

"Invented mythology" really is a better term than fantasy (high or otherwise) to describe Tolkien's books, especially The Silmarillion. Thanks for pointing that out.

@mikesnyder3317

Жыл бұрын

Tolkien was low fantasy. Like categorically. By definition. The low doesn't signify the quality of the story.

@HakuzaPK

Жыл бұрын

No he wasn’t?

@Jane-oz7pp

Жыл бұрын

@@mikesnyder3317 He is quite literally the father of modern high fantasy what are you talking about.

@Jane-oz7pp

Жыл бұрын

I wouldn't say it's more appropriate, it's more like prerequisite. Part of high fantasy is usually an invented mythology.

@DneilB007

Жыл бұрын

@@mikesnyder3317 “Low fantasy” is where fantastic elements insert themselves into the “reality” of the story-Peter Pan starts & ends in Victorian London, the Borrowers live in the wainscoting of Edwardian townhouses in Bedfordshire, and (arguably) the Barsoom science fiction stories of Burroughs. They are attached to the real world but they’re not a part of the real world. High fantasy is what Tolkien referred to as “subcreation”. Lloyd Alexander (of the Chronicles of Prydain series) literally invented the term “high fantasy” to differentiate between typical fantasy stories like the Oz books or Pinocchio and the more epic narratives of Tolkien and William Morris. I know that the gaming community has adopted the term to describe “realistic” daily life in a world populated with wizards, monsters, and demigods, but that’s a definition for cooperative storytelling, not fiction. That’s not just a different genre, but a different medium altogether. The terms do not travel.

Thank you for this. I had forgotten that Elrond hadn't summoned any of the Council, and it's nice to hear someone sticking up for the dwarves. Some of them (including Gimli) were richly emotional, but Legolas was actually much more likely to provide comic relief than Gimli and the hobbits most likely of all. I end up kind of torn on that issue. On one hand, it is enjoyable within the movies, on the other, the film-makers are kind of poking the same fun at the dwarves as Tolkien shows the sylvan elves doing. Which really annoyed the dwarves because they *did* take themselves so seriously.

I really enjoyed how you explained the differences in motivation between Morgoth and Sauron. Just because they had a master/squire relationship, does not mean they had the same motivations. I’ve always thought of the two in DND terms (oversimplified of course): Morgoth is Chaotic Evil Sauron is Lawful Evil

@udozocklein6023

5 ай бұрын

knights have squieres, masters have apprentices

@InGrindWeCrust2010

5 ай бұрын

A great example of this is how Galadriel's attempt to appeal to Sauron was ultimately pointless: he saw no difference between saving the world and what he intended to do with it.

This was amazing, thank you! I'm the Tolkien nerd in my house and when I told my boys about the origin of the Dwarves and how they were tied to Middle Earth because of their origin and only the kindness of Iluvitar gave them real life but no one knows their fate... well, they cried. Also the fate of mortals in the undying lands - but death is referred to as "the gift of Iluvitar", so...get comfortable with mystery. I see Tolkien as Philosophy more than Mythology but that is just me. :)

Just so you know, 'Established Titles'is a (legal) scam. They cannot grant legitimate titles and they do not transfer ownership of any land. The small print on their website does admit this, which is what keeps it legal. However, you are buying precisely nothing - save your money and pretend for free.

Tolkien often referred to LotR as a "romance": "Here is a small consignment of 'The Ring': the last two chapters that have been written, and the end of the Fourth Book of that great Romance,..." Letter 91 "Evidently I have managed to make the horror really horrible, and that is a great comfort; for every romance that takes things seriously must have a warp of fear and horror, if however remotely or representatively it is to resemble reality, and not be the merest escapism." Letter 109 "I sometimes conceive and write other things than verses or romance!" Letter 113 "My work has escaped from my control, and I have produced a monster: an immensely long, complex, rather bitter, and very terrifying romance, quite unfit for children (if fit for anybody); and it is not really a sequel to _The Hobbit,_ but to _The Silmarillion."_ Letter 124 "They wanted a sequel. But I wanted heroic legends and high romance. The result was _The Lord of the Rings."_ Letter 257 "My work is _not_ a 'novel', but an 'heroic romance' a much older and quite different variety of literature." Letter 329 et.al.

@DawnDavidson

Жыл бұрын

Yes, absolutely. Although it’s important to remember that Tolkien used the word romance in the medieval literature sense, not what we think of today, with a meet cute and a happily ever after. Gawain and the Green Knight was a romance, for instance. Classically, they were full of heroes on quests doing chivalrous things and defeating evil. Which pretty much sums up Frodo trekking to Mt Doom and destroying the One Ring and thereby Sauron.

@godwarrior3403

Жыл бұрын

​@Dawn Davidson Thank you cuz I was gonna say tlotr is not a romance haha

I would like to believe that Elrond gave his twin brother a hard time for his choice to be mortal. As loving brothers can jest with each other about even the worst of situations, it might have been in Elronds humor to refer to Elros as “old man” or something.

Num. 9 makes so much sense. Having Gloin and Bilbo rejoin could have been such an impactful interaction!

Really appreciate your treatment of Luthien. She is perhaps the preeminent being in all of Middle Earth history, being the blending of the most noble Elf blood and Maia through her father and mother and rivaling the likes of Feanor or any of the Maiar in both power and beauty. And she ultimately shared the fate of Men. She alone can represent all of Illuvatar's creation in a single person. She had less raw power than the Valar (of course). But she was probably more powerful than any Elf that ever lived and on par with any Maia. With the help of a wolf hound, she defeated Sauron and cursed him and cast him out of his fortress and took control of his island and cleansed it, and she faced Morgoth directly within his throne room in Angband, and wove a song spell to put Morgoth and his whole host of dark captains to sleep. Most Elves and Numenoreans that came after her lived in awe of her and revered her. Her choice to "become" mortal likely caused a collective "WTF - how did she do that?" from all wise beings of Middle Earth. It was her setting the precedent that presumably opened the door for her direct decedents to do the same.

@keitorin6937

Жыл бұрын

I love luthiens story- it hurts to know that more people wont ever get to know her,, but definitely on a more important level i think the movie/tv series industry needs to stop throwing out fake crap and start actually respecting Tolkiens work. The hobbit trilogy and rings of power were a laughing stock

@marekorbo7161

Жыл бұрын

It wasnt her pure power or spell tho. Morgoth would have crushed her easily but he was stunned by her beauty. He immediately started desiring her and started daydreaming about breaking and defiling her. During that she struck with her spell at distracted dark master. Her beauty was desribed as her most deadly weapon. How did she defeat Sauron though? I cant remember that other than fact that she cleansed his werewolf island/tower. I remeber Finrod Felagund losing to Sauron in duel of spell and song. I remeber that mighty dog Huan helping her a lot but I cant remember her duel with Sauron

@Raiseflag_Surrender

10 ай бұрын

Also when she wore Silmaril on her neck, not one of Sons of Feanor dared to claim the said Silmaril. Only when she died, Sons of Feanor moved against others to possess that Silmaril. They were afraid to try and kill Beren and Luthien knowing that it would be against Iluvatar's will. And their accursed Oath depended on the will of Iluvatar to be fulfilled.

Number 2 had really strong meaning to me. Specifically the image of Legolas helping the very old Gimli. It reminds me of the deeply bittersweet sorrow of watching a pet you'd loved and raised their whole life grow old and die while you are left to care for them in their growing frailty and ultimately, to carry on without them.

@Vicus_of_Utrecht

2 ай бұрын

😢

The fact that Tolkien invented a language for this world alone, puts it leaps and bounds ahead of Star Wars and Harry Potter.

@R3stor

11 ай бұрын

it's the other way around. He invented a world history for his already created languages.

@jackturner1352

11 ай бұрын

It gives Middle-Earth a serious level of depth, because words and names therefore have an etymology - part of the history that Tolkien built around his languages. The world feels lived-in and real.

@jawamedia1529

9 ай бұрын

Star Wars has invented languages. Admittedly, they aren't as meaningful as Middle Earths, but Star Wars does have proper languages that have been created

@PixelOverload

9 ай бұрын

yeah, Star Wars definitely had some original languages, but that's a pretty weird standard for quality in the first place, what invented languages should Harry Potter even have for example? You could design some more concrete languages for some of the "magical creatures" (that already have implied and partially designed languages), but what would that add to a story about the magical humans that mostly speak English anyway?

@mycontentcreation5264

9 ай бұрын

@@PixelOverloadHP did create a language it’s called British English

A side note about Arwen (and her brothers). Not only was she part Maia, part woMan and part Elf. She was also a reunification of the various sundered branches of the Elves, through her lineage. Elwe Thingol was a Sindar Teleri. Galadriel (her granny) was Eldar and part Noldor, part Teleri and part Vanya. Celeborn (grandad) was Moriquendi. So, the full monty or a right ole mongrel, according to taste.

@fearthemerciful

6 ай бұрын

"woMan"? Come on, we all know how Tolkien would've written it.

@xXAntiheldXx

6 ай бұрын

​@@fearthemercifulIf that is an allegation to sexism in Tolkiens works then let me stop you right there: The term "Man" is no more than the denomination of a literal(!) race in the context of a fictional society. It is no more sexist than "Dwarf" or "Elf".

@fearthemerciful

6 ай бұрын

@xXAntiheldXx The terminology comes from the Bible. The Bible is patriarchal on some level, but that's only an issue if you equate patriarchy to sexism.

@xXAntiheldXx

6 ай бұрын

@fearthemerciful the Bible isn't patriarchal "on some level" it's utterly patriarchal and sexist, period. I agree with the sentiment that using a term that originated from having to separate female and male declinations (female and male are actually not etymologically linked at all by the way) is derogatory, seeing as woman originates from wife+man. Funnily enough, the term wife originates from the proto-germanic wībam, which also means woman. But, and this is the big but, we cannot fault Tolkien for using words according to their primary meaning at the time his books were written, he was a linguist and invented his own language for f*s sake and he had to work with what people understood at the time so don't go blame Tolkien (and I want to reiterate and specify that we shouldn't blame him as an individual, seeing as we can do better) for the millenia of sexism preceding him. That is what I take offense with. An example is provided in the video itself, nowadays nobody uses the term "gay" as a synonym for "joyful" or "happy" anymore but either as a slur or as a form of self-empowerment (at least for confident homosexuals.) I am simply disappointed at the constant bickering in regards to "correct" terminology while we have bigger problems to work on, like climate change or the fact that we have allowed royalty by money to replace a royalty by blood.

@fearthemerciful

6 ай бұрын

@@xXAntiheldXx I promise you that if Tolkien was alive today that he'd align more with me than you. I know he lived in the past, but Tolkien was a genuine Christian, just like me, so his beliefs (which are extremely philosophically founded) in the Bible would be essentially the same as they were in the past, because the Bible hasn't changed over time. I never implied that Tolkien was a monster or a bigot. What I said was that "we all know how Tolkien would say it" even if he was living in today's time. If you know anything about Tolkien's faith, you'd know that he took it very seriously. Most likely took it far more seriously than me. I know you love LOTR and I'm not trying to make you hate Tolkien, but let's not pretend that Tolkien would've been pro-lgbtq+.

This is the type of content I'm happy to spend hours watching. Keep being awesome.

I always found the question of the personality of someone who was immortal very interesting. As an older person, I think Tom Bombadil is probably the most realistic role model, since as I age I find that things in general bother me less. It's a kind of "seen it all before" feeling. At the same time, I imagine an immortal person would be more likely to attempt something that would take a long time, since time is no object. For example: Writing world history, scientific (or, in fantasy, magical) research, playing musical instruments ,etc.. This might lead to different personalities, such as a scholar that finds things like emotion a worthless distraction, resulting in them being vulcan-like. Of course, it all depends how memory works. Human memory is poor even over our brief lifespans, so what would the memory of an immortal be like? Imagine if they only had about the same mental capacity as a human, so that they've forgotten way more things than they currently know.

@spacehootle309

Жыл бұрын

A very interesting thought/question. I recently reread the Silmarillion and it struck me how, for thousands of years, most elves have about as much impulse control and emotional regulation as a human teenager. Which reminds me of a Terry Prachett quote which says that the problem with immortality is; that to be perpetual/immortal means you can't change, and if you can't change, you can't learn. - Obviously this is not directly applicable here, but it makes me wonder if that's why elves seem to take so long to emotionally mature, and why Elrond seems hardly more that middle-aged and only the very oldest we meet, like Galadriel, are not bothered by most petty things anymore as you describe above?

@mgentles3

Жыл бұрын

Now that's interesting to think about. I too, am older and now I want to spend a little time considering this question. Thanks.

My first copy of LOTR was a single paperback, 1076 pages long, and was the 14th impression published in 1974. It is by far the most satisfying way to read the work, having the whole story in one's hand throughout. I still have the copy, I just wish I could still read from it, but alas, it is now falling apart from frequent use! I am now obliged to read three separate books, as though they were three individual stories!

@erynlasgalen1949

2 ай бұрын

You can imagine my chagrin when, after hearing good things about Tolkien and checking The Fellowship of the Ring out of our local library only to realize at the end that it was the first part of a trilogy and the subsequent books were not in the catalog. I had to buy the unauthorized paperbacks to finish the story.

If Sméagol and Deagol were relatives….then it seems most likely that they were cousins. They were of similar age, and the choices for a relative would be father, uncle or cousin. Of these, cousin is by far the most likely. We don’t know what “kind” of cousin (1st cousin, 2nd cousin; once removed, twice removed, etc.), but the fact that there are multiple choices for kind of cousin while you can only have a single kind of uncle (a brother of one of your parents) would reinforce this. Deagol was Sméagol’s cousin unless you can show me otherwise.

One idea I've had, regarding the Arkenstone/Silmaril connection, is if the Arkenstone is somehow a "rough draft" as it were, of the actual Silmarils. Only reason behind the idea is from the rings, as the elves made some lesser rings first as "essays in the craft" (AKA, they needed to grind their rings of power smithing skill until they could unlock the perk to craft the Great Rings), and it made me think that the Arkenstone could be a similar idea.

@Lilliathi

8 ай бұрын

I'd turn that around. Someone saw a Silmaril and tried to recreate it. Chinese knock-off Silmaril.

Tolkien wanted to create a mythology for England, which he thought it sorely lacked. He enumerated various other peoples and countries which had mythologies and mythological beings, such as the Elves of Scandinavia, but thought that England and the English needed their own equivalent.

@RabbitShirak

Жыл бұрын

He was also fascinated by Finnish mythology. Just compare the story of Kullervo and Turin. Or how singing is used in story telling.

@tommeakin1732

Жыл бұрын

This annoys me so fucking much. People *love* to grant everything they possibly can to Scandinavia. I can't even begin to express how many times I've seen people, without contention, confidently ascribe something that was common to all Germanic peoples to Scandinavia just because they have a hard on for Scandinavia. To your example, we know, without a doubt that elves existed in English mythology, as it did across the germanic world. To use a basic example: "Aelf" (with the AE being converted to either A or E in modern English) was a common start to many names; such as Aelfraed (Alfred). If elves didn't exist in the culture, how did that happen? Everybody already hates the English, including themselves - you don't need to make shit up to encourage that process

@Nazqua

11 ай бұрын

@@tommeakin1732 Based Reply

@Niki_0001

10 ай бұрын

@@tommeakin1732 Or, you know, the vast majority of people aren't experts on ancient Germanic folklore and have only heard of those things in the modern context of Scandinavian mythology.

@markbritton6798

9 ай бұрын

Well said that man!

They so missed Bilbo volunteering to take the Ring, in The Council of Elrond. It should have been in The Fellowship. And Gloin smiling from his deep respect for Bilbo.

Some of your very best work, massively entertaining well spoken and thought out to an epic level. Thank you so much for doing this!! I appreciate you!

@tolkienuntangled

7 ай бұрын

Thank you!

Great as always! I was loudly saying yes when you mentioned the emotionless elf trope. It's so annoying! Elves are supposed to be silly and joyfully and sentimental and ethereal. Like a ray of sunshine or a chirping bird or like a sorrowful rain. They are mostly much too wise to be stoic or cold.

@ianwestc

Жыл бұрын

The first point we meet the elves in The Hobbit book, they're singing a song about how Bilbo is fat and the dwarves' beards are absolutely ridiculous. So yeah, not that stiff and serious indeed, although the Hobbit was written in a time when his middle earth writing was a bit on the lighter and more whimsical side, something he would certainly reduce.

@WickedPrince3D

Жыл бұрын

Seems like somebody is confusing Vulcans (Star Trek space elves) with Tolkien Elves huh? I actually didn't notice that. I can imagine that the Wood Elves might be the fun-loving ones, and the Noldor being more taciturn because they'd committed a horrible sin just so that they could become the top of the races Sauron and Morgath were determined to destroy. And they were shown over and over again that fighting this was futile, at least against Morgath.

@johndododoe1411

Жыл бұрын

In terms of elven emotion, we must not forget the elven king and queen in Shakespeare's "a Midsummer Night's Dream", tvtropes has an extensive page about "The Fair Folk" in various stories and traditions, yet somehow fail to mention famed musical theater stories such as "Swan Lake" and "Elves Hill".

@paulrockatansky77

Жыл бұрын

I think that "the emotionless elf" trope mostly stems from the race of Noldorin elves, who were proud and haughty. With good reason, too. They rebelled against the Valar, fought Morgoth, established the mightiest realms in Middle Earth and created the most beautiful and magical objects, including the Silmarils and the RIngs of Power.

#11- Sauron did not wield a mace. He met Elendil and Gil-Galad on the slopes of Orodruin to fight unarmed and killed them both by hand.

@jeffeppenbach

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, the mace thing was Morgoth's jam. Grond!

@Dyrnwynn

Жыл бұрын

It's not really described in detail. Sauron could have used a weapon at some point during the long 2-in-1 duel. True, no weapon is described, let alone a mace, and it's rather explicitly stated that Sauron grasped Gil-Galad's head and set him on fire. Hardcore.

@josephmort4039

Жыл бұрын

@@Dyrnwynn And then the 7’ 11” human knocked his ass to the ground and his son cut off his finger.

@johns1625

Жыл бұрын

@@Dyrnwynn Not in detail, it just says he "wrestled" with Gil-Galad and Elendil.

@johns1625

11 ай бұрын

@@dominicmarazita8103 No, because Elendil and Gil-Galad are introduced with their weapons specifically named, as are literally every single other character that engages in physical battle. So either Sauron was not armed with a weapon or he's the only person in the whole legendarium to not have a named (or even described) weapon.

I agree wholeheartedly with your comments on the work NOT being a trilogy. I was fortunate enough to be loaned the paperback edition which was in one fat volume by a colleague in university. She recommended it and once I got used to the 1st chapter ( and caught hook line and sinker by the 2nd - Shadow of the Past ) I read it in every spare moment and finished it in about a fortnight. It was one of the most memorable experiences of my life, up to that point and I then went out and bought the hard back edition which was, alas, in 3 volumes. I agree that the division into three, although a practical help at the time of publishing, is not the best way to present it nowadays. Tolkien's divisions are obviously better all round.

@strawbbtarte

5 ай бұрын

Agreed. I have a big ol' "omnibus" version, and it's so much better to smoothly go on to the next part of the story instead of having to open up a whole new book; because it really doesn't feel like three separate books.

I just want to take a moment to appreciate the best rant on calendars I have ever heard. I'm totally converted and am one hundred percent behind you on this.

One thing I’ll note is that while it’s entirely up to interpretation, I’m of the opinion that the Ring was the one that compelled Frodo to take the quest to Mordor, seeing a halfling as the most likely to fail, especially one that has already been in possession of the Ring for a prolonged time. Thematically, it fits well with evil being self destructive, and the tendency for beings of power either overlooking or underestimating the smaller things. Also, the idea of Ilúvatar intervening to that degree robs the characters of their agency. I’m not denying that this was Ilúvatar’s grand plan, but I don’t believe He was micromanaging characters and events down to an individual level to achieve His goal. “Why fear the consequences of failure if God Himself has ordained that they succeed” is my point of view. I’ll also admit to ascribing to Death of the Author, and having a significantly different outlook on religion than Tolkien. I’m not saying another interpretation is wrong, or trying to change anyone’s mind on their own interpretation, but I do want to take the opportunity to respectfully state my own interpretation, wether it had been the author’s intent or not. And of course, I still have respect for Tolkien’s intent, even where my interpretations are in direct conflict with it. Literature, like all art, is inevitably subject to the interpretations and biases of the audience. It’s a testament to Tolkien that his works are flexible enough to support as many different interpretations as they do.

@gryphonvert

Жыл бұрын

I fully agree with you. I prefer an interpretation that does not lean on the idea of a sort of Divine Design. I respect that the idea may have brought comfort to Tolkien; but it's not a concept that works for me. I therefore find the story more powerful when it's forefronting the characters' agency, like Frodo's decision (?) to take the Ring to Mordor. Or even, the point made clear that Bilbo's long-ago moment of mercy, in deciding against killing Gollum, would ultimately be instrumental to the Ring's doom. I understand the objection to the way the movie portrays (and thus cements in many viewers' minds) the idea of Elrond calling the council, rather than the idea that these folks are all there by chance, or fate. As with so many other things, I think it's a change made more for the clarity of film storytelling than anything else. (Which, I know some people object to; some more strongly than others!) Yes, the films could have established separate reasons for Gloin and Gimli, Legolas, and Boromir to be there; but I can understand why they streamlined it. I do think it does good to remind folks that it's done quite differently in the books, though.

@kratal122

Жыл бұрын

@@gryphonvert Admittedly, the way Tolkien handled the assembly of the Council, only Boromir seems to’ve made the journey as a response to intervention from a higher power. Gloin and Gimli were in Rivendell to visit Bilbo, whom they have a strong relationship with, and Legolas was there to report the escape of Gollum, which was important information, so while higher powers may have intervened with the timing to produce the results, it was done in a much more subtle way. While I can understand why the film’s Council felt underwhelming, I also understand the necessity of condensing all of the reasons for why the characters were present to a simple invitation in the movies, and think the reason for it should be stressed. As The Hobbit hadn’t had a film at that point, introducing Gloin would’ve taken away screen time from more important events as well as violating the rule of “show don’t tell” to have actually justified why a character the audience has not met would travel unfriendly roads to see Bilbo, all when Gloin doesn’t make a reappearance. Legolas’ trip to bring the news of Gollum’s escape would’ve required establishment that Gollum had been caught and held in Mirkwood, as well as Barad-dûr, which also would’ve taken time away from more direct elements, when Mirkwood doesn’t appear at all in the trilogy. But I do wish that Aragorn had been the one to give the hobbits the Barrow Blades, explaining that the Dunedain had made them to combat the Witch King specifically, because the way the movies handled the Witch King’s defeat implies that Merry and Éowyn won on the sole merits of not being adult human males, instead of having a weapon that anyone can just pick up, but takes an extraordinary amount of courage to use against its intended foe. “No man can kill him” has a very different meaning than “not by the hand of man shall he fall.” If no *man* can kill him, I’ll just train an army of feral badgers.

@nicknamenescio

Жыл бұрын

I agree. I also think Iluvatar being that much involved would make limiting the power of the Istari pointless. If the idea was to make the Istari a helping hand for the free peoples to ultimately help themselves, then Iluvatar's far-reaching intervention would not only undermine the Council's agency but also that of all of Middle-Earth. But the purpose of Iluvatar's and the Ainurs' song is to create a world where the Flame Imperishable, free will, can triumph over the evil discord of Melkor. And that only works if the Supreme Being lets his creations enough "room to breathe".

@cranberryrosebud

Жыл бұрын

While I really like the idea of a higher power having more presence in the story, I prefer Frodo's offer to take the ring in the movie over the way it was described in this video - I agree with you about the characters being robbed of their agency, and also, I really love that line (and decision) as a character moment for Frodo. It's clearly a gargantuan task, and he even expresses that he wishes it wasn't his burden later on (in the movie at least), but his understanding of just how important it is that the ring gets to Mordor is perfectly highlighted by him speaking up, and especially speaking over characters that have chosen to argue instead of think rationally. It ties in perfectly to the theme of the movies, that it's up to small, simple hobbits to save Middle Earth because of how much of a danger corruption is - there are so many things, like the hobbits defying expectations, Aragorn redeeming his bloodline by accepting his place among men while fighting for Middle Earth, Legolas and Gimli putting aside their prejudice to join forces and eventually becoming friends, that make unity one of the biggest themes in the movies, and it all relies on the characters choosing to do what they know they have to, even if the decisions are hard ones, or ones they didn't expect to make. Frodo's decision is the first of these that hits me every time I watch. And when I say "in the movies", it's because I haven't read the books, these points could very well be just as significant in the books.

@Mr12Relic

2 ай бұрын

It's very clear in the book. The Ring knows Frodo can't destroy it (as Gandalf had encouraged him to throw it in the fireplace, so he tried his hardest and put it in his pocket). When Frodo accepts the burden he's surprised by his own willingness, as though another voice is working through him. He does want to help, and The Ring seizes the opportunity to get closer to its master. When he sat on the high throne at Amon Hen while wearing the Ring, he looked toward Mordor and despite his personal aversions he felt his thoughts twist into 'Verily I come, I come to you' until another voice (Gandalf from afar) compelled him to take it off. Then at the end when Gollum attacks Frodo on the path up Mount Doom, Sam saw with othersight Frodo as a white figure with a wheel of flame on his chest. From the wheel came the curse (paraphrasing) 'Touch me again and be cast you yourself into the fire'. Later, The Ring's power compelled Gollum to fall in, but he happened to be holding it. Evil destroys itself.

I love so many little things in your video .. the dramatic way you count the numbers, how you get so into side topics, and the great art you find. 11 outa 10 .. another great video I watched start to finish and even re-watched sections

@markbritton6798

Жыл бұрын

I think they ruin the minds interpretations of stories that are conjured in the mind, i had to read the silmarillion a few times over time before i really started to get interested after which i read everything i could get by tolkien, & their not as all knowing as comments suggest they are. good luck with the re runs but re read the books, instead of watching what is heresay after all

This is a top tier Tolkien channel! If you keep pumping out these long form videos, I'll keep watching. Thank you for the excellent content

@deniseindoung4514

4 ай бұрын

Yes, I've been binging on Tolkien videos lately, just clicking on whatever comes up in the feed, and Tolkien Untangled has the most interesting, in depth, and scholarly videos.

Dave, your epic-voice "number..." titles crack me up, and as always, your scholarship and attention to detail astound me. Thanks for another insightful video!

With all the frustration I've felt in the last year or so as a self-confessed Tolkien purist, finding this video and this channel with its unerring celebration of the accurate minutiae of the original work has been a great joy. Thank you!

@MobiusTrigger7

Жыл бұрын

Cringe

@markbritton6798

Жыл бұрын

one thing i noticed with Tolkien, if u miss 1 page you could miss so much, info on the weapons made by elves & dwarves, i have noticed some chapters have the most interesting data, for eg we hear of weapons made by Telchar the dwarf smith & improved upon by the elves such as Narsil & the helms & masks one of which is Turins, but miss that page you'll be confused later, a clue you say? "Children of Hurin! be sure to read every page!

When you talked about how Frodo would be dead by the time Sam got to the Undying lands I think that is untrue. When you read that a mortal sailing there would last only a half a year at most, they may be referring to how long a year is in the language of the Elves that live there which you noted would be something like 144 of our years. In that case sure, a mortal might only live a half of that Elf year (77 years) but that doesn’t speed them to their death, it is all subjective to the language used and not relative to what part of the world they are in. Therefore Sam should still be able to see Frodo assuming Frodos life expectancy didn’t diminish after his journey with the ring.

@GeneralTaco155555a

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I kinda refuse to believe that one. No way would Tolkien be that cruel, as to split them up forever by mercy killing them. The 77 year thing makes more sense to me too. As another comment pointed out, he says mortals would become weary, like how he said the Elves did in Middle Earth. I take these two things together as him saying that they could live longer (and potentially forever), but that eventually they would grow tired of it and welcome death.

@cherylromig3412

Жыл бұрын

Also Bilbo and Frodo are no longer ordinary mortals. They are ring bearers

Trivial and mostly unrelated observations: The unfinished drawing of Sauron has him in a pose similar to a famous photograph of Aleister Crowley. I also suspect that Gollum was strongly influenced by Crowley, who was an accomplished rock climber. A description of Crowley climbing at Beachy Head is extremely similar to Tolkien's description of Gollum climbing. Lastly, the Eye of Sauron looks awfully similar to The Tower in Crowley's Tarot deck...

Beeing listening the channel for a few days now. AWESOME and FANTASTIC! Thank you for sharing your time.

@tolkienuntangled

8 ай бұрын

Thanks!

Just love the fact that as you started to mention that not all elves are outright cheerful, I felt everyone watching the video somehow exclaiming as one voice, "Faenor" for some reason xD

@dmgroberts5471

Жыл бұрын

I believe Feanor's rare 'positive' moods distinctly leaned more towards maniacal.

@rjb639

14 күн бұрын

Add Eol to the list

I think in polish language we have some beautiful months names. April - Kwiecień - (Month) of Blossoms July - Lipiec - (Month) of Lime September - Wrzesień - (Month) of Heather November - Listopad - Falling Leaves

@KossolaxtheForesworn

Жыл бұрын

meanwhile our November is Marras, which is a really old word for Death and/or To Die. so its just the month of death.

@paulrockatansky77

Жыл бұрын

Polish month name of July / Lipiec actually stands for the Linden Tree (Lipa), not Lime. Also December (Grudzień) implies chunks of ice or frozen mud (grudy). And June (Czerwiec) is an insect name for a nasty little critter, Polish Cochineal, which had once been used to produce crimson dye. "Czerw" literally means Maggot or Grub. August (Sierpień) implies the summer harvest season. "Sierp" means Sickle, obviously used for cutting & collecting crops.

@volbla

11 ай бұрын

That's quite a contrast to japanese which literally just enumerates the months of the year. "First month", "second month", etc...

@martenlundin

9 ай бұрын

@@volbla well that's the "new" way of naming months in Japan, the traditional names were explanatory like in the Polish case. Mutsuki (睦月) / January Kisaragi (如月) / February Yayoi (弥生) / March Uzuki (卯月) / April Satsuki (皐月) / May Minazuki (水無月) / June Fumizuki (文月) / July Hazuki (葉月) / August Nagatsuki (長月) / September Kannazuki (神無月) / October Shimotsuki / November (霜月) Shiwasu (師走) / December Since the old calendar were based on lunar (like most old calendars) it doesn't exactly match up with the time of todays months.

I enjoyed this video a lot. Thank you for your efforts. You have a high-quality speaking voice and a good understanding of the subject.

This video made me happy, from beginning to end. Your energy and attention to detail is just ... immaculate. Subscribed! 💛

@tolkienuntangled

10 ай бұрын

Wow, thank you!

My copy of lotr is the long book with six sections to it- pretty cool to imagine I’m reading it how Tolkien intended!

@LegoHarrier

Жыл бұрын

Same here!

@Fenrir_8

Жыл бұрын

Same. One single volume with 6 "books" within it

About number two: you actually explain the difference of the Valar calendar and the Shire calendar earlier in the video. What Tolkien possibly meant with mortals living shorter lives in Valinor means that in comparison to the eternal beings there. Living only a few seasons would, in Valinor, mean decades of time in Shire. Thus creatures with a lot longer lifespans would not seem to age as the mortals did, but the mortals would still live their full lives, and it is possible that Sam and Frodo would meet each other once more, but would both be very old by the time.

@gryphonvert

Жыл бұрын

I always took that as more metaphorical as well! Or, yes, referring to the longer "year" reckoning of the elves. (But yes, I'd always understood that a mortal sailing to the Undying Lands did not mean the mortal would become "undying" or immortal. Only that in the Undying Lands they would find a peace in their remaining days that they would not be able to find in Middle Earth. As Dave says so very, very well -- all of Tolkien's work is suffused with a bittersweet quality.)

I absolutely love your Silmarillion series! Awesome stuff. This was a real eyeopener on things I've never put much thought on. I didn't think anything could be more interesting than the Silmarillion series, but this is up there with the best of those. :) When I think of a "modern fantasy setting" I actually imagine the DragonLance setting, as it was the books I read at the age when you are very susceptible for new impressions. I read LOTR maybe a year later or so (don't exactly remember, I mean.. we're talking mid 80'es here! :D ). That me and so many other still in the year 2023 are talking about and make content on Tolkiens LOTR is a testimony if nothing else in how great his creation is! Thanks for all the videos you make, they are great and I enjoy them immensely!

I feel like I say this in my head every second or third video of yours, but… This is my favorite video of yours to date.

I love your explanation of the calendar. And I especially love (and agree with) your enthusiasm for the Shire Reckoning! 😍

Thanks for a wonderful episode of Tolkien Untangled. When you got to the part about the Arkenstone I was laughing (while I was painting furniture, which isn't good!) because it basically described my experience with that theory: 1) After reading it for the first time, "Wow! That is so cool! The Arkenstone is a Simaril. I never thought of that!"; 2) Wakes up in the middle of the night thinking, "Wait a minute, does that make sense? What about blah, blah, blah and yada, yada, yada in The Silmarillion?"; 3) Gets up the next day, pulls The Silmarillion off the shelf, flips pages, reads and whispers, "Damn it ... that would have been awesome." I also want to comment on the Shire Reckoning Calendar. When you first started in with the "Tolkien did it better schtick" I gave you a bit of an eye roll. As much as I respect the Professor's work, and I do consider myself a fan, I refuse to genuflect at the "alter of Tolkien". While no one has accomplished what he has with world building, he was hardly perfect as a storyteller (I mean, the list is long). But after listening to what you had to say about his calendar, I think I agree with you! Tolkien's calendar is way better than ours and someone should get going on that "act of tyranny". Just saying. Additionally, I have learned a lot from your analysis of Sauron's character. I find myself thinking about it more frequently than I care to admit. I'm not disagreeing with your analysis at all; it makes Sauron so much more interesting than my limited understanding of him over the last 30 years. But how do you reconcile your analysis with this line from The Silmarillion: “In all the deeds of Melkor the Morgoth upon Arda, in his vast works and the deceits of his cunning, Sauron had a part, and was only less evil than his master in that for long he served another and not himself.”? And finally, I agree with you, Fëanor wasn't a psychopath ... he was a narcissist.

@markbritton6798

Жыл бұрын

The Arkenstone is most definately not a silmaril Jeez some of you will believe anything, read the silmarillion & a host of other storys that describe them & its obvious. The silmarils shine with the light of the trees of the valar. its like comparing a torch with a 1000 watt sodium lamp

On the topic of death and mortality. I find it interesting that mortality is referred to both as a doom and as a gift and as you phrase it here, that mortals return to Illúvatar, whereas the Eldar cannot do that really runs home the idea that this could indeed be a gift. Tolkien just created something truly magnificent. I think that bittersweet aspect is what makes middle-earth so deeply moving because it's hope in hopelessness, beauty in decay. That and the fact that he pretty much nails the choice of words and style for ever scene he sets out, be it funny, epic, tragic, moving or mysterious.

i freakin LOVED this video. i knew some of these misconceptions especially those about theories and other interpretations. but i never thought about the number 1 misconception the way you made your point here. i was distinguishing between fantasy and tolkiens lore but the comparison with the wizard of oz or alice wonderland honestly just hit different. thank you so much for this

One note about Scottish dwarves, the vikings did have a lot of influence on Scottish culture and language. To this day a lot of Northern UK have several Nordic names going around, be it for people or places, among other things.

@jarskil8862

Жыл бұрын

Didn't Norway own scotland in 1300s or something

Ever since I first read LOTR around forty years ago I've held the opinion that even though it's fiction it's HISTORY. There's something about it that just rings true and I can't quite put my finger on why. Perhaps it's because it's not the stereotypical 'happy ending'. So much that was great was lost to defeat Morgoth and Sauron. Sure, good won, but at such a terrible cost that the world will be forever less than it was. I had a similar feeling briefly during one of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies when Jack Sparrow said "The world is the same size, there's just less in it."

@artugert

Жыл бұрын

What if it really is based on historical events?

@lucarod8877

Жыл бұрын

"The world is still the same, there's just... less in it" is actually a perfect résumé of events in the Third Age.

@FrenkieWest32

11 ай бұрын

This sounds more like valuing of the quality of the fantasy, than it being history, unless I'm misunderstanding. I would also suggest lotr displays the stereotypical happy ending more than a lot of modern fantasy who approach it less as an epic, and more as a 'realistic' or even cynical story.

This was one of the best Tolkien related videos I've seen.

@tolkienuntangled

8 ай бұрын

Wow, thanks!

As a lifelong Tolkien fan, I greatly appreciate this perspective and clarification of his original work. Many thanks!

53:00 - You know, by complete coincidence, when I first read The Lord of the Rings (after seeing the first movie), it was in a one-volume edition, and that's how I most strongly remember it. It wasn't on purpose, it was just because that was what the school library happened to have on hand. But it really did help my first experience with it. I remember reading the separate volumes later and thinking, "Wait, Fellowship ends THERE?" and I had this whooooaaaa moment where I finally really understood Tolkien's correction of the "trilogy" label in the foreword. LotR really does make a lot more structural sense when taken as a singular novel.

In slavic languages some of the months are actually called by their seasonal natural occasion. In Czech language for example: May = květen [květ = flower] November = listopad [list= leaf; pad= fall]

Incredible art work, research, narration, muxing , simply outstanding! Thank you

@tolkienuntangled

8 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

My one criticism of Elrond in the movie trilogy was the fact that he came across as severe. When I read the books for the first time in the early 90's, I always pictured him as being a great deal more jovial.

@mgentles3

Жыл бұрын

The more times I read the books (and that's at least once a year) the worse the movie bothers me. I'm disappointed that so many will only know what's portrayed in the movies, including the change in the characters of Elrond, Faramir, and Frodo himself, who doesn't project any strength in the movies in my mind. The change in the Ents is okay, I guess. It's entertaining anyway. But the scene of Gandalf acting as an exorcist for Theoden is another bad move. My daughter only saw the movies and is determined it was sheer and obvious allegory on the part of Tolkien. Sad.

@ajalvarez3111

Жыл бұрын

@@mgentles3 I understand what you are saying but I look at it a little differently. I think a very large percentage of the movie watchers would have never read the books. So I’m actually glad these people got at least this exposure to this incredible fantasy world and story in the movies. Now, if I were dictator for a day I would mandate courses for the reading and breaking down of the Hobbit in middle school; LOTR in high school; and The Silmarillion in college.

@mgentles3

Жыл бұрын

@@ajalvarez3111 I did actually mean to include the fact that it's better to have the movie exposure to Tolkien than no exposure at all. The comment got long and got away from me. You are absolutely correct, and I couldn't be happier that New Line Cinema took a chance and the movies were made. Thanks for the heads up.

@artugert

Жыл бұрын

@@mgentles3 Totally. I've only read the LotR books three times, but the last time was recently. Although I enjoyed the movies, reading the books makes me yearn to see movies made that stay much closer to the source material. Alas, it is not likely to be made any time soon! I also agree with AJ's comment. I watched the first movie the day it came out, just before Christmas, then I got the book and started reading it just after Christmas. If the movies were never made, I'm not sure if I ever would've read the book.

@ryancruz1876

Жыл бұрын

Those movies butchered Elrond.

If 'little more than a half-year' is measured in Valian year, that would account for 72 years. That would just barely work out for Frodo and Sam meeting again.

I would argue that Tolkien "invented" High Fantasy in that High Fantasy uses Mythological elements as opposed to fantasy which is just "fantasic" i.e not real. The precursors to Tolkien in my mind in reverse chronological order would be Le Morte D' Arthur, Beowulf, The Odyssey, and The poems of Gilgamesh. Note the last 3 are usually classified as Mythology rather than fantasy.

Loved the section on the different calendars. Would love a deeper dive. Great research! Amazing knowledge.

@tolkienuntangled

10 ай бұрын

Thanks!

Great video! I do feel the need to point out that Sauron isn't actually reduced to just his eponymous Eye in the films either - when Aragorn challenges him at the Palantir, you can see Sauron's actual physical body clutching his own palantir for a moment, within the pupil of the Great Eye, right before he shows the vision of Arwen's death.

@vladprus4019

Жыл бұрын

Generally, movie depiction wasn't really set in stone. Like, one time it seems that "lighhouse" eye is Sauron, the other you hear about deleting scene of Aragorn vs Sauron fight....

re - Sauron potentially regrowing his finger I think it's the Quenta Silmarillion that talks about the Valar (and the Maiar) and how they are easily able to switch between having a physical body (Hroa), or discarding it and moving about as a spirit (fea). It goes on to say, however, that the longer they maintain and use a Hroa, the less able they are to change it or to (easily) discard it.

@spacehootle309

Жыл бұрын

You seem to have better memory than me: Isn't there a mention in the Silmarillion of Sauron that goes along the lines of: "And thereafter he could never take form again" after he lost The Ring?

@Raz.C

Жыл бұрын

@@spacehootle309 If I recall correctly, that line/ those lines say that he could never again take on a form that was fair, or pleasing to look at. It was only after the destruction of the One Ring at the end of the 3rd Age, that Sauron entirely lost the ability to take on any physical forms.

@rafaelbudrovic1453

Жыл бұрын

@@Raz.C exactly, before the downfall of Numenor, Sauron was able to assume any form, fair or fell. It is thus that he assumed the form of Annatar and tricked both the Elves (Quenti) and Ar-Pharazon and Numenoreans. When Iluvatar destroyed Numenor and moved Valinor from Middle Earth, it was thought he perished, but it was only his body and he was for a while unnable to take a physical form but later he had one. A big man, black as night and terrible.

@ChrisMattern-oh6wx

6 ай бұрын

Fall of Numenor. Sauron was caught in the drowning and lost his physical body. Tolkien says that he was never again after that able to take a pleasing form, like the one he had used as "Annatar"("Lord of Gifts") to dupe the Elves of Eregion to help him forge the Rings of Power.@@spacehootle309

This was so so brilliant. As a Tolkien fan for decades I'm still learning new aspects to the stories, and his vision of the world he created

This is an amazing video, it’s easy to follow and pack with information.

Sauron’s ambitions for middle-earth are obvious and written on the first page. One ring to rule them all…

I thought all the characters (barring perhaps Legolas) who sailed to 'the undying lands' actually went to Tol Eressea, the island set apart from Valinor. If I'm correct, it would be nice to hear more from you about that island, its origin and the reason of its making, and the inhabitants as well.

@vorthora

Жыл бұрын

Yes

@peterang6912

Жыл бұрын

Just read the Silmarillion, there is a whole part about Tol Eressea..

@mgentles3

Жыл бұрын

@@peterang6912 Yes, I've read it several times, though my retention stinks.

@peterang6912

Жыл бұрын

@@mgentles3 yes well, you realy need to read The Silmarillion a lot of times before you start to get the conections.and remember who and what... al those races and sub races of elves, dwarfs and humans.. ( and i'm not even talking about al the names and surnames of them all...) 🤣🤣

@spangelicious837

Жыл бұрын

IIRC, it was the island that Úlmo used to transport some of the elves to Valinor. It was then anchored in that spot and remained there ever after.

The Scottish dwarf stereotype comes from the book "Three Hearts and Three Lions". That book was one of many that inspired Gary Gygax in making D&D, which spilled into popular culture.

@dixonhill1108

7 ай бұрын

It's also because the Lowland Accent is the most germanic sounding of English accent as it still as many of the traits most similar to Dutch.

Awesome content. Glad I found your channel. It's nice to be reminded of some truths that have been diluted for me over time. Might be time to revisit his works again.

As always - EXCELLENT! I always wanted to get clarification on Sauron's corporeal form during the period of the Lord of the Rings (particularly since the movies and animated versions portray him only as a lidless fire-eye evil spirit), However, when Gollum confirms to Frodo that "he" only has 9 fingers, obviously Gollum saw the physicalform of Sauron. I think it is best that Professor Tolkien kept the physical description of Sauron at this time vague since it stirs in our imagination his physically frightening appearance after the fall of Numenor, AND his powerful maia spirit that can pierce through his land (like the evil version on the Girdle of Melian). Thank you again for your thoroughly enlightening podcast. ❤️💗💙💛

In the Yule days you can see how Tolkien knew so much about Scandinavian myths, which is 12 days, or the tedious christmas carol "The 12 days of Xmas",something the old Scandinavians celebrated.

@tommeakin1732

Жыл бұрын

Why does Scandinavia get to claim everything common to all Germanic peoples? Don't just repeat stuff that supremacists like to repeat

Even in other passages of the Lord of the Rings, the elves often start laughing: for example, when Gimli devours a lembas biscuit in one bite, but in general they appear to be less alien beings than in the films, Galadriel also constantly maintains a very friendly and smiling, even during his trial against the temptation of the Ring. The characteristic that stands out in book elves is not so much their stoicity, but their sadness, which often mixes with lightheartedness. But I fully realize how difficult it was to make elves different from men, dwarves and hobbits in films, without risking appearing "ridiculous".

This was excellent! Well done ☺️

I love not only your depth of knowledge on the subject, but your analysis. I can't imagine I've given as much thought to anything in my life, resembling what you have on these stories.

I once had the Lord of the Rings as a single tome. With the appendices included. Man that was a wonderful thing to hold. Wish i still had it. Not a book to read while lying on your back holding it above you, unless you are wanting a work out for your arms while you read. There were a few of these points that i had wrong. Most notably the facts about the elves not being able to chose a mortal life and what the two towers actually were. I really like these videos. Every time I click on one I learn something new about the stories that are being told or the history of Middle Earth. Keep it up.

@tolkienuntangled

Жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@timz9862

Жыл бұрын

I have that book. It’s bound in red with gold foil lettering and includes a fold-out map of Middle Earth.😊

@yurylyandres6900

Жыл бұрын

Checked the shelves - there was a single-tome HarperCollins (1995) paperback edition of 1100+ pages. It's a workout not just for the arms, but also for the eyes.

Regarding point 8, Sauron personally torturing Gollum makes perfect sense, Gollum is Sauron's only clue as to where the Ring is located. I find it very unlikely he'd leave extracting that information to anyone else.

I'm fairly new to the lord of the rings lore and deep history, and thoroughly enjoy learning so much. You've absolutely sold me on the hobbit calendar!

I'm in for the Shire calendar! Living in equator really doesn't change anything much, really, sun shining all year long, day and night pretty munch are the same length, greenery never changes, plants growing forever. So, Shire calendar will make everything less complicated.