@AdamElmasriEnglish Only have time for the first one. Samiri. Very weak argument that you can use to fool one who does not know. It is completely rational that it is a tribal name that existed before the city. Which is very common and obvious. Many cities are founded after tribes, or famous surnames of leaders of the time. I suppose no Fatimids or Abbasids ever existed before the dynasties that bear their names... This leap to historical confusion is very dubious and ends up proving more your desperation than knowledge. Names are rarely given in the Quran, and when they are it's for a very specific reason. Much of which is beyond your will to research. God knows best for me, as for you I think it is a test for you and those who follow...

@electro639

11 ай бұрын

Rashad Ibn, you say: "Only have time for Samiri", lol. Is this how much you care about dawah for Allah and defending your deen? What is more important for you than this? - What Adam El-masry states goes in accordance with what most historians say. Your opinion + "god knows best for me" are very feeble sentences which only would suffice a Muslim who wants to stay as a Muslim.

@AdamElmasriEnglish

11 ай бұрын

@rashadibn I can tell straight away that you are not an Arabic speaker. Because clearly you don't know how names are constructed in Arabic. You need yo understand that any name that starts with "El" or "Al" and ends with "i" or "y" means that the name came from a relation to something that existed before it. For instance, when you say the Abbasid era (which in Arabic is read as Al Abbasi), that means it is a era in relation to the person know as Abou El Abbas. Notice that Al Abbas here doesn't end with i or y. Only the era that is related to him ends with i or y (Al Abbasi age) Similarly, the Fatimids - in Arabic reads as "Al Fatimi" - in relation to Fatima, the daughter of the prophet. Again, notice that Fatima doesn't end with I or Y. Only the era in relation to her ends with i or y (Al Fatimi era) Similarly, all the names like Al Masri (related to Masr), Al Mohammadi (related to Mohammed), Al Bukhary (related to Bukhara), Al Tahtawi (related to Tahta), Al Arabi (related to Arab) ... and I can go forever. Now the name Al Samiri - is the same - has to be a name in relation to something that existed before the person. If not the city of Samaria or the nations of the Samaritans, then what is it that he relates to? Your argument doesn't stand here! ANd clearly you don't know Arabic!! To make it easier to understand, it is similar to the English language. Any noun that is preceded with "The" and ends with "-ian" also means in relation to. Examples: The Egyptian (related to Egypt) , The American (related to America), The Christian (related to Christ), The Politician (related to politics), The Samaritan (related to Samaria)...

@rashadibn

11 ай бұрын

@@electro639This is because our time on earth is limited and I have ascertained your debates are a waste of that time. This is not dawah nor is it suitable research

@rashadibn

11 ай бұрын

@@AdamElmasriEnglish This argument still does not address my point. I know enough Arabic to speak to this. As Samiri does not negate a pre existing tribe or people. You have ignored this. Al Quraishi is a name of a tribe not a City. They existed before the name and there is not city named after them. In any case the Quran does not address any biblicallly referenced people like you have set forth in your argument. Samiri is given a punishment, therefore the individual mentioned is not condemned for his origin but his deed. Again. It is not impossible for them to be a pre existing religion or sect that existed in Egypt. Nor is it impossible that civilizations existed whose names we are not aware. The Quran mentions many names not in the historical record, Dhul Qurnain who was that? Or Ashabul Kahf and Ar Raqeem of Surah Al Kahf, mentioned after the Jews of Medinah questioned the Prophets knowledge of their own history. These names don't appear in their records, did he invent them? You will not raise any point but infinite arguments which can never bring certainty but doubts, because you conjecture and project perceived knowledge.

@AdamElmasriEnglish

11 ай бұрын

@@rashadibn Al Quraishi is a great example. Yes. It is a tribe and not a city. But the tribe has to exist first before the name. First, you have to have Quraish (regardless, city or tribe), then you can have a person who is Quraishi. My argument is that neither the city of Samaria or the people\tribe known as Samaritans existed at the time of Moses. Therefore the Samiri (who came from the city or tribe) could not have existed at the time. At the time of Moses, there was no Kingdom of Israel yet. They just went out of Egypt (under Moses guidance) there was no split between Jews and Samaritans yet... there were only the 12 known patriarchal tribes of Jacob decent - No Kingdom, no conflicts, no splits no Samaritan tribe!!! Where did the Samiri come from and what is the name related to (if not a tribe or a city)???

muslim recites quran, ex-muslim has understood quran.

@shaikhatheem1843

11 ай бұрын

Understood what,,, don't be an idiot like him,, don't be blind and gullible,, google what I've inserted and learn the truth ,,,

@sivas291

11 ай бұрын

That's why I left islam 20 years ago

@yamatanoorochi4498

11 ай бұрын

@@sivas291 may allah guide you back to islam ya akhi please dont betray your belief like this allah is the most merciful come back to him and inshallah he will forgive you

@khaosform8525

11 ай бұрын

Ex-muslim gets refuted and his argument destroyed within a day of posting this video: Have fun: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

Dear Adam As you always makes us excited with your in depth research and exposing the facts , thank you very much and please continue in this exciting exploration in revealing the truth and only the truth

Thank you Adam for this Channel. More power to you 💪

@AdamElmasriEnglish

6 ай бұрын

My pleasure!

The excuse he made up about Mariam was not on the spot. He went away and came back with that excuse after a few day. This is something I heard from a learned atheist.

@donquixote3927

11 ай бұрын

And hundreds of years later the excuses are no better :-)

@_Gx2

11 ай бұрын

Because the prophet never says something about Islam on his own he waits for the revelation

@maalfons

9 ай бұрын

​@@_Gx2😂

@user-mh4ol4pq7v

9 ай бұрын

That doesn't mean the 3xcuse isn't valid. Also the bible does the same thing with other prophets what the Qur'an did with mariam

@donquixote3927

9 ай бұрын

@@user-mh4ol4pq7v : Allah could not have mistaken the two Mariam’s. You appear to be admitting the Quor’an has made a mistake. Therefore the Quor’an is not from Allah. The Bible does not have the same divine pretensions.

I love the mistake where the Quran confused Mary with Miriam. Because Muhammad tried to defend it in Bukhari 25:5326 and Muslim 2135, and there is no such thing as that Jewish custom. For the Christians who want to debate this with Muslims, always ask them to provide evidence. They're forced to admit that either 2 Sahih (best grade) grade hadiths were wrong, Muhammad was wrong or Quran was wrong. That's a literal checkmate for Islam heh.

@officialfrass

4 ай бұрын

The Quran makes it worse saying the wife of Imran gave birth to maryam

Scientific, Moral, Historical, Theological, Rational... You name it and the koran has those types of mistakes.

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@walidsai3164

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 i love how they claim quran isnt historically accurate and their bible cant even get jesus birth straight and give two dates with 10 years apart let alone

@rommy007

11 ай бұрын

@@walidsai3164 Confusing Mary and Mariam is a very clear error but I still see some muslin defending it. The Christians of Najran were wiser than Allah. Do muslims describe themselves as Son of Adam AND Brother of Moses? Can you describe yourself as the son of Allah? I'm sure your real father would be offended if you claim to be the son of someone else and as per the Qur'an Allah has no sons and adoption is forbidden so muslims Cannot claim anyone else as father. Show me just 1 example where the Qur'an calls someone who is not related directly as father of xyz.

@prophetnozza4150

11 ай бұрын

@@walidsai3164 Hahaha IT GIVES NO DATES..... We dont claim about your quran ITS SELF EVIDENT!

@electro639

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 You're wrong, as usual Muslims are. CLAIM 1 Zimri is not related to Samaritan. The name זִמְרִי means "praise singer", "musical" and it derives from the name zamar זָמַר which means "to sing praise." For example in Psalm 30:4: "Sing praise to Yahwah" "Zamməru Yahwah." TRANSLATORS: 01) Sahih International: [Allāh] said, "But indeed, We have tried your people after you [departed], and the Sāmirī1 has led them astray." Footnote Translated as "the Samaritan" (from Samaria), a hypocrite among them who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 02) Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran: Allah responded, “We have indeed tested your people in your absence, and the Sâmiri1 has led them astray.” Footnote The Sâmiri, or the man from Samaria, was a hypocrite who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 03) Dr. Ghali: Said He, "Yet surely We have already tempted your people even after you; (i.e., after your departure from them) and As- Samiriyy (The Samaritan) has led them into error." 04) Dr. T. B. Irving: He said: "We have tested your folk in your absence and the Samaritan has led them astray." - CLAIM 2 You wrote: "I can be called the brother of Muhammad." MY RESPONSE: Prophet Muhammad claimed to be Abu Bakr's spiritual brother, but he had sex with his own mother (Muhammad was a believer and Aisha was the "mother of the believers", which includes prophet Muhammad). Therefore, your prophet Muhammad practised incest. If you are right about the flexibility of spiritual family bonds, then Muhammad had no right to say that Aisha couldn't marry anyone after his death just because she was the mother of the believers. Sshe could have been considered as "the widow of late brother Muhammad (sister-in-law)" by some Muslims and marry her. Many contradictions, incest and inconsistencies. The mistake about Maryams is very clear: Jesus' mother is attributed the family of Maryam the prophetess and not the common ancestors' names such as Adam, Abhraman, Isaac and/or Jacob. - CLAIM 3 You wrote: "The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name." MY RESPONSE: What is your proff that Haman literally means "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers"? The dictionary "The People in the New Kingdom" refers to Haman as "the head of the quarry workers". (Hermanne Ranke, Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Verzeichnis der Namen, Verlag Von J J Augustin in Glückstadt, Band I, 1935. Band II, 1952). Therefore, the source states that the name is Haman and he is referred as "the head of the quarry workers." Moreover, Muslims apologists are the ones who say that Haman is a name because they want to link him to the Biblical figure; it's not only stated by Adam el-Masry.

love your channel! thanks for what you do

@AdamElmasriEnglish

9 ай бұрын

I appreciate that!

The fact you have to baby them is hilarious like a child who believes in Santa lmaoooo

This is amazing, Thank you ❤

I had heard many times about the mariam one but remaining errors I am hearing for the first time... You are really thourough.. I love it...keep it up brother

@khaosform8525

11 ай бұрын

No, he is not really thorough, he is using books of reference that have no historical preservation or proof to them to try to make his desperate claims, here watch his thorough research get thoroughly destroyed within a day of being posted: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@MajorityGains

11 ай бұрын

Watch newest video of syfetalk debunking this ex christian’s claims.

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 allah = 3 gods and mahamed (POLICE BE UPON HIM) is NOT a prophet and the quran shows that Jesus is DIVINE and the quran also shows that mahamed (POLICE BE UPON HIM) was a SINNER. JESUSuAKBAR ✌

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

@@polokucoch8112 God is not author of confusion and Bible is full of contradiction. Prove me wrong without telling lies.

The Bible says Adam was the first man which predates Masr. Since names of things have no continuity in history, but instead only exist in the time mentioned by the sources I follow dogmatically, we must conclude that Adam Elmasri isn't actually a real person.

Awesome. Nice new knowledge.🎉🎉

The Samiri is a nickname. Ibn `Abbas is reported to have said: "As-Samiri was a man from the people of Bajarma, a people who worshipped cows.. ..his name was Musa bin Zafar.'' That's one opinion. A more telling explanation is provided by Qatadah, who said: "He was from the village of Samarra.'', as reported by Ibn Kathir. Sāmarrāʾ just so happens to be an ancient place in Iraq that already existed in prehistory. It is a World Heritage Site on UNESCO's list. It was situated just north-west of where ancient Sumeria once existed. And again; Samarra and Sumer are very similar names. In ancient times, there existed the city of Samarra there, and the modern city equivalent with the same name still exists there. This makes sense to me, as the Euphrates drainage basin was likely home to a species of water buffalo, and bulls played a major role in several regional religion's symbolisms. See the Biblical Behemoth, for instance. And the Golden Calf was named "Bahmut", according to Al-Hasan Al-Basri. What this guy was doing, traveling with the Israelites; I do not know. Perhaps he (and some others of his clan) ended up in Egypt and vacated when the Israelites left; tagging along with them. But this is not necessarily referring to the Biblical Samaritans, nor to the geographical region of Sameria in Israel (šō-mə-rō-wn in 1 Kings 13:32), but to some person from a place called Samarra. Samaritans are not from Samarra (in Iraq), despite the similar sounding name, and "the Samiri" was not from Sameria (in Palestine). Names and/or place names can be similar, even without there being a direct linguistic connection. "Kim" for example, is a Western name, but it's also Korean. They share no connection. So the mistake in this criticism here is in assuming that the name "Kim" can only refer to Koreans, or that a "Samiri" must refer to the Israelite Samaritans. Also, the Biblical "shemer", according to 1 Kings 16:24 was named so after the original owner of the hill, proving that the name was already in use, even according to the Bible. The ancient Mesopotamian Royal title "King of Sumer and Akkad" was still being used around the time of Moses(as). In the Akkadian language, for example, the Assyrian King Tukulti-Ninurta I called himself; šar māt Šumeri u Akkadi (1243-1207 BC). What this means is that the name "The Samiri", describing an individual from a place called Samarra, isn't necessarily anachronistic, as it's clear that the name itself was used long before the events discussed in the Qur'an, and afterwards as well, and that there were several geographical places that used the name (or a very similar form thereof). To claim that this is a mistake, is to ignore these facts, and blindly insist on the erroneous assumption that "The Samiri" could only refer to the Israelite Samaritans.

@fkvk6869

9 ай бұрын

Thank you so much! I was trying to search these so called errors on the internet to find true answers but I couldn't. Your repsonse clarified. Thank you.

@XaeeD

9 ай бұрын

@@fkvk6869 No problem!

@fkvk6869

9 ай бұрын

​@@XaeeDDo you know anything about his 3rd claim? Baked clay one?

@XaeeD

9 ай бұрын

@@fkvk6869 Qur'an 28:38 waqāla fir'ʿawnu - and Firaun said yāayyuhā l-mala-u - o you chiefs mā ʿalim'tu lakum min ilāhin ghayrī - not [do] I know for you any deities besides me fa-awqid lī - so ignite [a fire] for me yāhāmānu - o Haman ʿalā l-ṭīni - upon the clay fa-ij'ʿal lī ṣarḥan - and construct for me "sarhan" laʿallī aṭṭaliʿu ilā ilāhi mūsā - so that I may look towards [the] deity of Musa wa-innī la-aẓunnuhu mina l-kādhibīna - and I certainly think that he [is] of [those who are] the liars Paraphrasing: And the Pharaoh said: "O you chiefs! I know no other gods for you but myself. So ignite a fire for me, o Haman, upon the clay, and you make me a "sarhan", so that I can look to the god of Moses. And I'm sure he's lying. There's no word there for "bricks", no verb for "bake". It says "ignite (a fire) upon the clay", and it doesn't say "bake bricks out of clay". And "sarhan" does not mean "a high tower". There's a reason why it's translated as such, but it's an erroneous translation.

@123buraikake4

5 ай бұрын

lol

It also sounds like the author of the Quran conflated the Haman story with the Tower of Babel (tower to reach to heaven).

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@jonhilderbrand4615

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 Nah...

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

@@jonhilderbrand4615 There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his last servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@jonhilderbrand4615

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 whatever...

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 There is None BUT JESUS, who is allah's MASTER and KING! allumduliJESUS!!!!

Einstein said: “Logic can take you from point A to point B. Imagination can take you to where you wish to be”.

Whenever I mention historical facts, errors, or differences between the Bible and the Quran, that could not be because of history to a Muslim, I am glibly told, "The Quran transcends all time". Therefore, I am always wrong and Muslims are always right. No discussions will be entered into!

@CAHaxan

8 ай бұрын

Or they start ranting and breaking down Arabic words and trying to say your explanation is wrong. It's all a trick.

@myself4128

6 ай бұрын

They can Lie &Twist all the truth cuz Allah allows Muslims to defend the cult even by Lying or killing

Super. I am so happy I came across your channel.

Here's my favourite historical error in the Quran Then opened We the gates of heaven with pouring water And caused the earth to gush forth springs, so that the waters met for a predestined purpose. Quran 54:11-12 At length, behold! there came Our command, and the fountains of the earth gushed forth! We said: "Embark therein, of each kind two, male and female, and your family - except those against whom the word has already gone forth,- and the Believers." but only a few believed with him. Quran 11:40 The son replied: "I will betake myself to some mountain: it will save me from the water." Noah said: "This day nothing can save, from the command of Allah, any but those on whom He hath mercy! "And the waves came between them, and the son was among those overwhelmed in the Flood. Quran 11:43 And Noah, said: "O my Lord! Leave not of the Unbelievers, a single one on earth! Quran 71:26 At length, behold! there came Our command, and the fountains of the earth gushed forth! We said: "Embark therein, of each kind two, male and female, and your family - except those against whom the word has already gone forth,- and the Believers." but only a few believed with him. Quran 11:40 The Quran contains a version of the worldwide-flood story widespread in ancient near-Eastern mythology and most famously found in the Bible and the epic of Gilgamesh a non Abrahamic polytheistic Literature‌ Since every piece of geological, meteorological, archaeology evidence suggests such a flood never took place, some modern Muslim scholars have reinterpreted the account in the Quran as referring to a more limited, local flood. Several elements in the tale, however, militate against this rereading. this story waters are released from both of them. Another such detail is the storage of "two of each kind" of animal aboard the ship, since it is not clear what purpose this would serve if the flood were local. Similarly, the purpose of the boat itself appears unclear in this reading - as with the ample warning time that Noah was given, he and his family could have simply evacuated the area that was to be flooded. The relevant passage also states plainly that nothing, not even a tall mountain, could save an individual from drowning on that day except for Allah - this seems to contradict the idea that individuals and animals could have escaped the flood simply by evacuating the flooded area. Noah is recorded praying to God, "O my Lord! Leave not of the Unbelievers [kuffar], a single one on Earth!" - the flood is an answer to this prayer, which likewise suggests that the flood described is a global flood that drowns all those not chosen by Allah to persist aboard the ark. So since the Qur'an contains myths and legends of primitive culture than one can come to the conclusion that it is not the word of god and there by false!

@MummysMunch101

5 ай бұрын

Thease are not errors , Their errors according to you. Firstly You need to Wrap Your Head Around "The Post Talk Fallacy" - Just Because B comes After A ,That Does Not Mean B came From A.

@MummysMunch101

5 ай бұрын

Bro Your Just Yapping🤣

@celestialsatheist1535

5 ай бұрын

​@@MummysMunch101bufoons

@pinoyfuntvph5457

4 ай бұрын

A FairyTales.... urbanlegend story to intertain people hehehe....😅

ADAM ELMASRI is literally serving humanity by showing them the TRUTH ❤.

@abubaytnighan6480

11 ай бұрын

Bro you’re everywhere

@R-rr1

11 ай бұрын

You’re everywhere ?

@Reminiscent-yk3nc

11 ай бұрын

He's actually a good researcher.. His type can hardly be snared into false religion..

@abubaytnighan6480

11 ай бұрын

@@Cls818 the majority of stories in the quran are poorly stolen besides the ones that happened in Mo’s time like his fight with his wives or in his wars.

@R-rr1

11 ай бұрын

@@Cls818 it’s the same Some Jewish scribes wrote the Quran .

Excellent presentation.(btw I made a video debunking the claim by Maurice Bucaille that Haman of the Qur'an is mentioned on a Stele from Ancient Egypt.)

@EverlastingEgo

11 ай бұрын

great video 👍

@Nonamam

11 ай бұрын

Get back in the game! You're sorely needed & it's a great time!

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@Nonamam

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 but we know this is false. When did u become a murtad brother? Alhumpisslullah

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

@@Nonamam There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

1400 years back in Mecca Jews asked from Prophet PBUH fellows if you knows all then "Can you tell us how Israeli's reached to Egypt" and then Quran explained whole story in Surah Yousaf

About the Christians of Najran, this is what Wikipedia says: "In the 7th century, Christians of Najran interacted with the Islamic prophet Muhammad, who allowed them to worship in his mosque. There is evidence that the community continued to thrive until the 9th century; the community no longer exists today." I wonder how the community ceased to exist. Might have been evaporation.

Thank you for this channel @AdamElmasriEnglish

*Haman* Online, you can find an oft-repeated claim being made, which is that the name Haman has been discovered on some tablet. They refer this to page 399 of Leo Rienisch's book "Die aegyptischen Denkmaeler in Miramar". It is then claimed that this Haman was the "overseer of the stone masons", which is a translation of Reinisch's interpretation (in German) of some hieroglyphs. A picture of Reinisch's scribblings is included, which shows the German interpretation. While interesting, I thought I'd look into this, because I noticed that the English translation of his writings in German wasn't literal. I'm not German (or English for that matter), but I am fluent in all three major West-Germanic languages, so I can read the original text. So the text on the picture reads "Vorsteher der Steinbrucharbeiter", which translates to "chief of the quarry workers", which is a more accurate translation than "overseer of the stone masons". Not that big a deal, but I decided to click on the link provided by an Islamic website and have a look at the source. It's in late 19th century German, often difficult to read, and it's not an ideal digitized version. First problem is that the book doesn't have a page 399. There's only 320 pages. So I Googled the 2007 digitized version and found this site; " archive". There, they did number the pages beyond 320, but they don't actually have the relevant image on page 399. It does show up on 417 though. This further illustrates the importance of providing good references. On that page it shows image XXXIX, so now you have to go back and find the commentary that goes with this image, which is a tedious exercise. The translation of those glyphs is found on page 273 and 274. Here's the translation of tablet 39's inscriptions in German: Am unteren Theile der Stele sieht man das Bild eines Jünglings, welcher Opfergaben auf einen Tisch legt. Hinter diesem sitzt ein Mann mit einer Frau, wohl die Eltern des opfernden Sohnes. Die an der Stele befindliche Inschrift lautet (Taf. XXXIX, B): "...auf seinem Tische, lieblichen Hauch der Lebensluft, und eine schöne Beerdigung nach einem hohen Alter der Person des Aufsehers der Opferspenden des Ammon, Hmunhu, des Gerechtfertigten." "...alle guten und reinen Gaben der Person des Aufsehers der Opferspenden des Ammon, Hmunhu, des Gerechtfertigen." This is my own translation into English: On the bottom part of the tablet an image of a youth is seen, who places offerings on a table. Behind it, a man and a woman are seated, Probably the parents of the sacrificing son. The inscription on the tablet states: "...on his table, sweet breath of life, And a beautiful funeral after old age for the person of overseers of the offerings for Ammon, Hmunhu, of the righteous." "...all the good and pure gifts of the person of overseers of offerings for Ammon, Hmunhu, of the righteous." The syntax is a bit weird, so it would read (better) as follows: "And after a ripe old age, the righteous provided a beautiful funeral for Hmunhu; the master of overseers of the sacrificial offerings for Ammon." "All the good and pure gifts of the righteous to Hmunhu; the master of overseers of sacrificial offerings for Ammon." Now obviously, the author doesn't actually use "Haman" here, but it says Hmunhu, instead. It's presented as a name, and isn't translated. It does sound similar to Haman, but it's still vague imo. I'd been staring at the actual inscription and the hieroglyphics, and I pulled up the wiki list of Egyptian glyphs, and the more I look at it, the more sceptical/intrigued I become. That is because I can see how the German scholar translated it: I can match his translations with the inscriptions, and then compare his interpretation (which was published in 1865, mind you) with contemporary interpretations that are listed on wikipedia. When I look at the glyph of a man leaning on a staff, then that glyph is a bit worn. It turns out that there are two very similar glyphs. One is of a man leaning on a forked staff, which means that this person is just elderly, but then there's one of a man holding a staff and a small handkerchief, which means that this is a civil servant, a courtier or a high ranking official. The difference is significant. Note that a courtier is someone who advises kings and queens. The actual glyph lacks the forked end on the staff, and I believe I can see the handkerchief in the other hand. It looks like Gardiner's A21 on the sign list that can be found on wikipedia. Moreover, the inscription of the man is clearly standing straight, and the man is not bent over, so in my opinion, this is not A19 either. I honestly think that the German author mistakenly interpreted that glyph to merely be referring to old age, while it's more likely a reference to the person's high social status; possibly even working as a courtier. We also see a basket with a handle, which means "lord" or "master" (see V30 and V31). The inscription for "Hmunhu" contains symbol V28, which can be read and pronounced as "hah", see wikipedia on "Heh (god)". So perhaps the rendering could possibly be "Hahmunhu" instead of H[uh]munhu, but I'm not sure if the symbol is used like that. This is followed by the senet board symbol (Y5), which is pronounced as "mn" or "men" and can be a name component. So you now get (possibly) hah-men or hah-mn, instead of "hmun". Then there's the rippling water symbol (N35), which is an "n". I suspect they would pronounce it as "nah" instead of "enn", as we do, because they pronounced "Amun" as "Amana". It now adds up: hah-mn-nah. When compared to the symbols for Amun, then Amun lacks the hah, but has a flowering reed symbol, which is a "y" sound. The rest is the same. Amun is spelled as Y-M-N (reconstructed as Ya-Ma-Nuh), pronounced as Amana. And the other name is spelled H-M-N (reconstructed as Ha-Ma-Nuh), possibly pronounced as Hamana or Hamanu. What I find contradictory here is that Rienisch seems to have two conflicting interpretations for the man's job. In the book it says that he was an "overseer of the [sacrificial] offerings for Amun", but then in his own handwriting he says that he was the "chief of the quarry workers", which is often quoted by other Muslims (copy-pasting Islamic websites). Unfortunately, I can't find all the references for the glyphs used in that description, but I'm pretty confident one is an arm holding a tool (see D36 to D44). It could be that Rienisch thought it was a chisel or a hammer or something. I'm more inclined to interpret it as such, as oppose to referring to offering. But does that mean he's a stone mason? A tool can mean anything. At any rate. This inscription mentions the death of a Lord or Master of quarry workers (or stone masons, or priests; depending on which interpretation you take), who was being honored by righteous, eminent people. "And a good funeral provided by the righteous for the courtier Haman; lord of the masons in service of Amana." What this means is that the name Haman was most certainly used in ancient Egypt. It's actually similar to the well-known Egyptian name Amon (alternatively; Hammon), as in Amon-Ra, for instance. To claim that the name Haman couldn't possibly be Egyptian is ridiculous; the object of ridicule. The irony here is that this ignorant Christian says that the author of the Qur'an clearly didn't know what he was talking about. Also, while Christians run around, cheering this nonsense on, because "he speaks Arabic", the dude in the video completely misrepresents the ayat connected to Haman. I'm thinking of writing a follow-up to this, just to explain what the verse he's criticizing really means, and why it's actually a major proof for the veracity of the Qur'an. But that would take several more paragraphs. If anyone's interested, let me know, and inshaAllah I'll elaborate on the contents of the verses this sad individual is trying to diminish.

@Mohammedamer-tj5ev

10 ай бұрын

Mashallah awesome work brother

@dqschannel

10 ай бұрын

That's a lot of 🐎 💩

@dqschannel

10 ай бұрын

Any time you want to debate the poorly written Quran let me know.

@XaeeD

10 ай бұрын

@@dqschannel What I'd like to know from you, is what the Behemoth in the Bible is. You've got the Holy Spirit, right? To guide you on all matters. Without looking it up, from your own understanding; what's a behemoth? If you research it, and Google it, and come back with an answer, then God knows that you didn't know the answer. I want to see if the Holy Spirit inspires you to give the correct answer.

@dqschannel

10 ай бұрын

@@XaeeD LMAO you actually think your tactic is going to work on me. You want me then come live on my show and explain why Allah made mistakes in his perfect book.

Muslims cannot use the excuse that Adam Elmasri does not understand Arabic. Adam's channel should have at least one million subscribers.

@KissMyBlackStone

11 ай бұрын

Exactly 😂 , whats next for them to say

@KissMyBlackStone

11 ай бұрын

Whats their next excuse 😂

@shaikhatheem1843

11 ай бұрын

I've googled his claims but sadly ,,he is way of his assumptions.. he is now an atheist,, I'm not going to pray for him and may he burn forever more in hell

@KissMyBlackStone

11 ай бұрын

@@shaikhatheem1843 thats the best you can say? 😂 Keep it up

@mikealkarout9555

11 ай бұрын

@@KissMyBlackStone This vid that totally destroys his lies ,with actual facts!! kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

“Promoting Critical Thinking” Everyone please do your own research do not use such people as your source many of them say different things and 80% of them have their own agenda.

Your channel is fantastic this video is great.

This channel should be seen by millions of people ❤.

@shaikhatheem1843

11 ай бұрын

Research my friend ,,don't be a cake

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@electro639

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 You're wrong. CLAIM 1 Zimri is not related to Samaritan. The name זִמְרִי means "praise singer", "musical" and it derives from the name zamar זָמַר which means "to sing praise." For example in Psalm 30:4: "Sing praise to Yahwah" "Zamməru Yahwah." TRANSLATORS: 01) Sahih International: [Allāh] said, "But indeed, We have tried your people after you [departed], and the Sāmirī1 has led them astray." Footnote Translated as "the Samaritan" (from Samaria), a hypocrite among them who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 02) Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran: Allah responded, “We have indeed tested your people in your absence, and the Sâmiri1 has led them astray.” Footnote The Sâmiri, or the man from Samaria, was a hypocrite who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 03) Dr. Ghali: Said He, "Yet surely We have already tempted your people even after you; (i.e., after your departure from them) and As- Samiriyy (The Samaritan) has led them into error." 04) Dr. T. B. Irving: He said: "We have tested your folk in your absence and the Samaritan has led them astray." - CLAIM 2 You wrote: "I can be called the brother of Muhammad." MY RESPONSE: Prophet Muhammad claimed to be Abu Bakr's spiritual brother, but he had sex with his own mother (Muhammad was a believer and Aisha was the "mother of the believers", which includes prophet Muhammad). Therefore, your prophet Muhammad practised incest. If you are right about the flexibility of spiritual family bonds, then Muhammad had no right to say that Aisha couldn't marry anyone after his death just because she was the mother of the believers. Sshe could have been considered as "the widow of late brother Muhammad (sister-in-law)" by some Muslims and marry her. Many contradictions, incest and inconsistencies. The mistake about Maryams is very clear: Jesus' mother is attributed the family of Maryam the prophetess and not the common ancestors' names such as Adam, Abhraman, Isaac and/or Jacob. - CLAIM 3 You wrote: "The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name." MY RESPONSE: What is your proff that Haman literally means "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers"? The dictionary "The People in the New Kingdom" refers to Haman as "the head of the quarry workers". (Hermanne Ranke, Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Verzeichnis der Namen, Verlag Von J J Augustin in Glückstadt, Band I, 1935. Band II, 1952). Therefore, the source states that the name is Haman and he is referred as "the head of the quarry workers." Moreover, Muslims apologists are the ones who say that Haman is a name because they want to link him to the Biblical figure; it's not only stated by Adam el-Masry.

@BrickScience889

9 ай бұрын

you be everywhere

Research of high quality. A presentation not promotion hate but telling the truth with respect.

@khaosform8525

11 ай бұрын

There is no research of high quality dude is literally using books that are actually fiction and have no actual proof to their preservation as his basis for his points. All this "research of high quality" you call it, is disrproved right here, not even a day into this video being posted: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@terrencetncube264

11 ай бұрын

100% No doubt

I love how he in the beginning stating that his intention isn't not to hurt beliefs

@WayOfJannah

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/lWaj2KuFk8LZe7w.html

@killermoon635

11 ай бұрын

@@WayOfJannah kzread.info/dash/bejne/qa2JqcVxg6qolrQ.html

@Nonamam

11 ай бұрын

Lol what an interesting name, half in in, half Jewish, half Italian. R u anglo?

@I9s7lam5is-S3tu1pid

11 ай бұрын

@@Nonamam 1/3 Indian, 1/3 Jewish and 1/3 English

@neerajantony9097

11 ай бұрын

@@Nonamam me? I am pure Indian, and a pure Christian

Islam is a copy of judaism basically, but for arabic speakers

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 allah = 3 gods

@shinushinu1636

7 ай бұрын

​@@polokucoch8112 Who said that😂... If u don't know then don't talk.... There is only one God.... And that is ALLAH...

@polokucoch8112

7 ай бұрын

@@shinushinu1636 Jesus said "I AM THE FIRST AND THE LAST" allah says 700 years later "i am the first and the last" allah is 100% FAKE pagan god...

@kennyg1358

2 ай бұрын

​@@sifat1730the mantra of a brainwashed slave.

I just stumbled upon this channel. This is very very interesting and informative. Thank you 👍

@AdamElmasriEnglish

5 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching!l and following the channel.

The quran author made another classic error with egyptian history when he came up with this verse Sura 20:71: (Pharaoh) said: "Believe ye in Him before I give you permission? Surely this must be your leader, who has taught you magic! be sure I will cut off your hands and feet on opposite sides, and I will have you crucified on trunks of palm-trees: so shall ye know for certain, which of us can give the more severe and the more lasting punishment!" Firstly there is zero evidence the egyptians ever crucufied anyone. Secondly the first recorded crucifixion occured much later on from Moses time ..around 600 BC...800 years after Moses

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

So lack of evidence is your evidence?

@electro639

11 ай бұрын

@@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS Of course. If Muhammad says that he was driving a car, there is lack of evidence that cars existed back then. They were created later, but even if this had been in the Quran, Muslims would say that Muhammad invented the car.

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 allah = 3 gods

Thank you . All is exact 🙏

Zabardasth. Yes we need more vedios like this

@abeerakhan99

11 ай бұрын

Haman (Minister of stone queries) among other ministers under Pharoah during era of Moses(pbuh).Egyptian hieroglyphics ,which had died as a language 2000 years before prophet Muhammad(pbuh) , were revived by german and french scholars in the late 1800. This name was discovered in the 1900’s. Quran never lies. Other then that exodus 14:28 drowning of army Who tells wht happened later? the Quran 10: 90-92 Talks about preserving this pharoah’s body to be a sign for people who come after. His body was discovered in 1881 , dr. Maurice bucaille questioned how did this body to the exclusion of other mummified bodies remained that intact

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@abeerakhan99 quran does lie. All the time : allah's FAKE scientific miracle : allah thinks milk is made in a cow's Belly (stomach) Q16:66 - And there is certainly a lesson for you in cattle: We give you to drink of what is in their bellies, from between digested food and blood: pure milk, pleasant to drink. MILK IS 100% NOT MADE IN THE BELLY/STOMACH OF THE COW, NOR IS MILK IN THE BELLY/STOMACH OF A COW.. allah is 100% FALSE, quran is 100% FALSE, mahamed is 100% FALSE

When Jesus comes back at the end time and if he testifies Muhammad is a Messenger of God, then what happened to you. Don’t guess, look at his message. What Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said was came from God, in your point of view and research you can argue. But if All he said was from God then what you say? If Jesus testifies you have to believe.

For years, the Muslims were drumming that the silly book quran from GOD. Thank you for the amazing truth.

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@abrahamraj3172

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 yes there's no GOD by the name of allah, but Satan's other name is allah. Only the devil can produce a pedophile, a murderer, a rapist and a caravan thief to be a prophet and deceit many to follow him the devil. Your own source is enough for us to know that you worship the devil allah.

Great video, I enjoyed it a lot. Please tell me you have more! One of the mistakes I like is in 7:124 which claims Pharaoh threatened his magicians with death by crucifixion after they believed in Moses but Ancient Egyptians did not crucify people. It's a later Greek/Roman punishment with first mention near 500BC, almost 1000 years before the fictional tale of Moses is purported to have happened. Edit: My argument above is invalid and cannot be presented as a mistake in the historicity of the quran because verse 20:71 clarifies that the word crucifixion used in this case meant being tied to a palm tree trunk, not a T-shaped crucifix of later design as I originally understood. My bad.

@MagdalenaSz-A

11 ай бұрын

Thanks for sharing 👍 I didn't pay attention to that so good to know!

@hassamneetoo956

11 ай бұрын

Wrong. The pharaoh threatened to have their hands and opposing limbs chopped off . This is clearly not crucifiction mate. So the Quran is right.

@jaredpetersen277

11 ай бұрын

​@@hassamneetoo956 so i gave you the benefit of the doubt. And I went to the quran to see what it says. Why did you quote half a verse? Why did you not finish it?

@avalancheofapostasy4916

11 ай бұрын

@@hassamneetoo956 Quran 7:124 "I will certainly cut off your hands and feet opposite sides, then crucify you all." The Quran is wrong. You are wrong and a liar for trying to deceive, and @aretha6360 is 100% correct.

@avalancheofapostasy4916

11 ай бұрын

@@jaredpetersen277 Well done...👍👍

well im glad to know my Bible isn't the only book out there with these fundamental issues

the great egyptians became muslim that was sad

I think the bigger problem about the pharoah story is that the author clearly uses Pharoah as a name and not a title. And if you have been exposed to Islam devoid of the contemporary western apologetics, you know it's considered a name of a person and not a title. There are titles like Al aziz in the story of Yusuf and even Al mala' - pharoah's council. There's absolutely no indication that this was just a title. This for me is a bigger problem.

@JaefarSABNW

11 ай бұрын

Haman and Qarun are titles too and Quran generally doesn't name the enemies.

@shassarahaman5247

11 ай бұрын

@@JaefarSABNW No they are not. They are names of people just like Firawn

@mujtabahussin6369

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@dqschannel

10 ай бұрын

Allah also thinks messiah is a name when it's a title.

@pandawandas

6 ай бұрын

@@JaefarSABNWwhere are you getting this from?

If you make a list of what is true in the Quran, it would be a very short list...

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

well if 114 chapters is short for you sure

@andrevisser7542

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319, you should work on your reading comprehension skills, I've said truth, not lies and deception. 😄

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

@@andrevisser7542 maybe you should yours, i've answered your original point

@andrevisser7542

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319, so far I could find only three sentences of which Islam doesn't understand the true meaning of two.

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

@@andrevisser7542 please do post them to me, let's see what you got. but the guy you got em from better be better than el masri or you know what happens next hahaha

So? It shows it knew the future, infact, it proves it is actually devine! Amazing how 1 person knew so much in the year 600's.....Quran is truely amazing...

Brother asked a very good question...😂

Adam El Masri is the best ❤

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

Not so much 😅😅😅 kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@mujtabahussin6369

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

I really appreciate your time to search for truth thank you brother lord giving guidance whom he love

Nobody can use the reason he doesnt know arabic

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@KissMyBlackStone

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 CLAIM 1 Zimri is not related to Samaritan. The name זִמְרִי means "praise singer", "musical" and it derives from the name zamar זָמַר which means "to sing praise." For example in Psalm 30:4: "Sing praise to Yahwah" "Zamməru Yahwah." TRANSLATORS: 01) Sahih International: [Allāh] said, "But indeed, We have tried your people after you [departed], and the Sāmirī1 has led them astray." Footnote Translated as "the Samaritan" (from Samaria), a hypocrite among them who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 02) Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran: Allah responded, “We have indeed tested your people in your absence, and the Sâmiri1 has led them astray.” Footnote The Sâmiri, or the man from Samaria, was a hypocrite who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 03) Dr. Ghali: Said He, "Yet surely We have already tempted your people even after you; (i.e., after your departure from them) and As- Samiriyy (The Samaritan) has led them into error." 04) Dr. T. B. Irving: He said: "We have tested your folk in your absence and the Samaritan has led them astray." - CLAIM 2 You wrote: "I can be called the brother of Muhammad." MY RESPONSE: Prophet Muhammad claimed to be Abu Bakr's spiritual brother, but he had sex with his own mother (Muhammad was a believer and Aisha was the "mother of the believers", which includes prophet Muhammad). Therefore, your prophet Muhammad practised incest. If you are right about the flexibility of spiritual family bonds, then Muhammad had no right to say that Aisha couldn't marry anyone after his death just because she was the mother of the believers. Sshe could have been considered as "the widow of late brother Muhammad (sister-in-law)" by some Muslims and marry her. Many contradictions, incest and inconsistencies. The mistake about Maryams is very clear: Jesus' mother is attributed the family of Maryam the prophetess and not the common ancestors' names such as Adam, Abhraman, Isaac and/or Jacob. - CLAIM 3 You wrote: "The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name." MY RESPONSE: What is your proof that Haman literally means "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers"? The dictionary "The People in the New Kingdom" refers to Haman as "the head of the quarry workers". (Hermanne Ranke, Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Verzeichnis der Namen, Verlag Von J J Augustin in Glückstadt, Band I, 1935. Band II, 1952). Therefore, the source states that the name is Haman and he is referred as "the head of the quarry workers." Moreover, Muslims apologists are the ones who say that Haman is a name because they want to link him to the Biblical figure; it is not only stated by Adam el-Masry.

@SORIANSIST

10 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 are you still a Muslim, Adam?

@adamsayid6319

10 ай бұрын

@@SORIANSIST yes i am and will forever be, look at my replies on other comments and the video from syfetalk, this man has been outed as a liar - critical thinking my backside lmfao

@SORIANSIST

10 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 do you think your life would fall apart if your belief in Islam was shattered? How strong is your faith?

As a Christian i support you. God bless.

@m.rusann9687

11 ай бұрын

What are some of the most cruel or evil Bible passages? A: The only passage of the bible that has brought me close to tears, which is quite something for me, is Numbers 31:17. I can quote from memory: “Kill every male among the little ones, and every woman who has known a man by lying with him, but those women who have not known a man by lying with him, you may keep alive for yourselves”. Terrified women and children, whose menfolk have been slaughtered before their eyes, being brutalised in the most inhumane ways, if you can imagine that running a pregnant woman through with a sword, or killing a screaming infant boy, is justifiable in this context, you have lost your damn mind. Worse still, it’s not the first massacre, or the last, but it sticks in my mind as the one which evoked the most visceral shock when I read it, and continues to do so to this day. As Thomas Paine put it: The butchery of the boys, the massacre of the mothers and the debauchery of the daughters”, because why else would untouched women and girls be kept alive? And it’s all done in the name of a god.

God bless sir ...

Well explained sir

Allah do not lets us to astray. Allah do not destroy Ummah. Allah be Clear. Allah do not use Taqiya. Allah do not be BEST Deceiver. [[[✋👌👍]]]

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

?

@Reminiscent-yk3nc

11 ай бұрын

Allah is my Guy😎😂

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@damyankuzmic5605

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 Allah and MoHaMeD Allah hu MoHaMeD are YoU MuShirik?

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

@@damyankuzmic5605 are you an illiterate. Don’t you see I wrote Muhammad (PBUH) is his servant and Messenger. I don’t wonder why you are disbeliever. Such an ignorant person🤣🤦💀

without lies islam dies

@Youngzonalbaba

11 ай бұрын

Without lies you are die man 😂

😂😅🤣😅😂😅🤣😅😂😅🤣😂😅🤣🤣🤣 this is FUNNIER than God became A MEAT

God bless you

The name “Haman” was not known until the decoding of Egyptian hieroglyphics in the 19th century. When the hieroglyphics were decoded, it was understood that Haman was a close helper of the Pharaoh and was “the head of the stone quarries“. The most important point here is that Haman is mentioned in the Qur’an as the person who directed construction work under the command of the Pharaoh. This means that information that could not have been known by anybody else at that time was given in the Qur’an, a point most worthy of note.

@regtaylor1163

8 ай бұрын

Where are you getting this steaming plate 💩 of knowledge? Source please.

@abdirahimburale5630

8 ай бұрын

@@regtaylor1163I’ve got my source where’s your source

@regtaylor1163

8 ай бұрын

What source are you talking about? Can you read hieroglyphics?

@killermoon635

7 ай бұрын

There is no haman name in Egyptian hieroglyphics The name is hmn-h So you already start with a lie

@wennemalino9013

5 ай бұрын

Then what about Mary & Samari? Do you have sources to debunk the explanation given in this video?

Well, there's a Amana who was the minister of buildings and development in the times of Raamses 2.

1: samaritans existed way before samaria was established. 2: People were called with the names of prophets and righteous people who had gone before them, as an example even today in some arab cultures you call your uncle (ex: joe) „brother joe“ and grandfathers „fathers“. Moreover it is clear that you are waiting for the prophet to say „i was wrong“ instead of considering the possibility of him telling the truth. Very biased argument. 3: it was rhetorical, pharaoh was mocking the message of moses. 4(bonus) : referring to other religious books to „debunk“ another doesn’t make any sense and is misleading.

@123buraikake4

5 ай бұрын

lol😆

@user-oo2kb3mt6f

3 ай бұрын

If you don’t mind, could you go a bit more in depth about #2. I’m a little confused by what you mean. Maybe another example?

@Muslim_Lady

Ай бұрын

@@user-oo2kb3mt6f This video has been refuted by a Muslim here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html .

Five things that Muslims cannot and will never answer: 1. The word "al-Masih" (Messiah) means "the anointed" in Hebrew, and it always meant "the savior" in Jewish history. If Jesus is al-Masih, whom did Jesus save from what by how? 2. "I challenge you to show me one verse from the Bible that Jesus clearly states Himself as God." Challenge accepted. Isaiah 44:6 (God says): "... I am the first and I am the last, and there is no God besides Me." Revelation 22:13 (Jesus says): "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end." 3. If the Bible is corrupt, where in the Quran does it say that? If the Bible is corrupt, why do you find evidence of Muhammad from a corrupt book? If the Bible is corrupt, why does Allah give the same authority to it as the Quran (Surah 9:111), and order Muhammad to "ask the people of scripture about what I have revealed to you"? (10:94) 4. God in the Bible calls the temple "My House" and Allah in the Quran calls the Kabaah "My House." If infinite God comes into the finite building, does He cease to be limitless? If God enters the building, does God stop being everywhere (omnipresence)? Who is God inside the building, and who is God outside the building? (Now change "the building" with "a human form" and read it again.) 5. The Quran was not preserved perfectly. 5-1. You do not have the original Quran, which is a compilation of bark, leaves, leather, and stones that Zayd ibn Thabit collected. 5-2. Many people who memorized the Quran died during the war. 5-3. People fought and even killed each other because of different recitations. 5-4. When Zayd compiled the Quran, there were two verses that only one man remembered. But the Quran teaches that you need at least two men for valid testimony. 5-5. Ibn Masud didn't like the Quran which was compiled by Zayd and even said, "It is deceitful." 5-6. Aysha reported that there were more than 200 verses in Surah 33, but now you have only 73 verses. 5-7. Zayd compiled "one" version, but you have "seven" Qiraats and even more versions of the Quran that read and mean differently. Even though you do not believe in any Hadith narration above, this fact can solely disprove the perfect preservation of the Quran because nowhere in the Quran says about dialects. 5-8. If the Quran is preserved by memorization and recitation, shouldn't Zayd, Ibn Masud, or other companions remember the whole Quran without asking other people, without looking for written materials, without disagreeing with each other? Even the closest companions of Muhammad didn't memorize the Quran perfectly.

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

Who wrote revelations? 😅😅😅😅

@juyeonglee1605

11 ай бұрын

@@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS Who wrote the Quran? 😅😅😅😅

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS The chapters of the quran are the equivalent to books of the Bible. Who wrote which chapters of the quran? 100% anonymous? We're NOT talking about revelation, as all scripture is revealed, we're talking about authorship of each chapter (equivalent to books of the Bible) in the quran. Who were the authors?

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

@polokucoch8112 Allah is the author of the quran as claimed by the text. Chapters are not the same thing as books,that claim is just asinine. 😅 Now circling back to the Bible, the text doesn't claim who wrote it, nor does it claim to be inspired. It isn't even in its original language. 🤣

@juyeonglee1605

11 ай бұрын

@@polokucoch8112 Do you see the number three? Read it and answer me.

Regarding the confuse you are having in the era of Haman, refer by googling 'Rosetta stone' in hoffsberg museum. On decoding the old hyrogliphic language, it has clearly mentioned that Haman was the person who lead the engineering team of Pharoah

God bless you abundantly 🎉🎉🎉🎉

so how is there historical error if in the story of prophet joseph they called the rulers of egypt kings and not pharohs bec the time of prophet joseph was at the time when the hoksus took over egypt, so its king and not pharoh because the hoksus are not pharohs, they are kings, while in prophet musa (moses) it was pharoh and not king, bec the egyptians ruled egypt at that time, so how does a book from 1400 years ago know that? and also the quran mentions haroon which was a builder in ancient egypt, and at the time of prophet muhammad nobody knew anything about egyptian history, so how did the quran know that there was someone named haroon which was actually a builder in ancient egypt (sorry i repeated that) hope you understood and peace

@TheScripturesOfGodAlmighty

2 ай бұрын

Theyre blind

Without lies pagan Islam dies. ..... Al ham du lil Lah... Lah.. Lah.. Lah.

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@Reminiscent-yk3nc

11 ай бұрын

😂

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

@@Reminiscent-yk3nc yeah it is funny how deceptive these guys can be to non-arabs

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

Xtianity is objectively lipstick on a pagan roman pig. Now what makes Islam pagan?

@TruthNgullie

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 Who wrote the surat Al-Baqara and surat Al-imran, in the Quran??

Its like they mistaken Queen Elizabeth to live in USA.. its a fucking joke 😂

That “ prophet “ sounds like he didn’t know !😮 I don’t think any Jews have this tradition to name their offspring a name given to some older saints !😮

The fact the jews ask mohammad why he said mary sister of aaron, confirms mohammad doesnt know what he is talking about. Very smart muslims , they even wrote it down in their hadith 😂

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@electro639

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 You're wrong, as usual Muslims are. CLAIM 1 Zimri is not related to Samaritan. The name זִמְרִי means "praise singer", "musical" and it derives from the name zamar זָמַר which means "to sing praise." For example in Psalm 30:4: "Sing praise to Yahwah" "Zamməru Yahwah." TRANSLATORS: 01) Sahih International: [Allāh] said, "But indeed, We have tried your people after you [departed], and the Sāmirī1 has led them astray." Footnote Translated as "the Samaritan" (from Samaria), a hypocrite among them who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 02) Dr. Mustafa Khattab, the Clear Quran: Allah responded, “We have indeed tested your people in your absence, and the Sâmiri1 has led them astray.” Footnote The Sâmiri, or the man from Samaria, was a hypocrite who led the Children of Israel into idol-worship. 03) Dr. Ghali: Said He, "Yet surely We have already tempted your people even after you; (i.e., after your departure from them) and As- Samiriyy (The Samaritan) has led them into error." 04) Dr. T. B. Irving: He said: "We have tested your folk in your absence and the Samaritan has led them astray." - CLAIM 2 You wrote: "I can be called the brother of Muhammad." MY RESPONSE: Muhammad claimed to be Abu Bakr's spiritual brother, but he had sex with his own mother (Muhammad was a believer and Aisha was the "mother of the believers", which includes prophet Muhammad). Therefore, your prophet Muhammad practised incest. If you are right about the flexibility of spiritual family bonds, then Muhammad had no right to say that Aisha couldn't marry anyone after his death just because she was the mother of the believers. Sshe could have been considered as "the widow of late brother Muhammad (sister-in-law)" by some Muslims and marry her. Many contradictions, incest and inconsistencies. The mistake about Maryams is very clear: Jesus' mother is attributed the family of Maryam the prophetess and not the common ancestors' names such as Adam, Abhraman, Isaac and/or Jacob. - CLAIM 3 You wrote: "The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name." MY RESPONSE: What is your proof that Haman literally means "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers"? The dictionary "The People in the New Kingdom" refers to Haman as "the head of the quarry workers". (Hermanne Ranke, Die Ägyptischen Personennamen, Verzeichnis der Namen, Verlag Von J J Augustin in Glückstadt, Band I, 1935. Band II, 1952). Therefore, the source states that the name is Haman and he is referred as "the head of the quarry workers." Moreover, Muslims apologists are the ones who say that Haman is a name because they want to link him to the Biblical figure; it's not only stated by Adam el-Masry.

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@KissMyBlackStone

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 great tell me something i didnt know

@xynoxys

11 ай бұрын

This adam and sifat dude are over the place Bet if they see video about their imam explain how nowadays many people leave islam. Their mouth will be fuming

You're technically brilliant and your research is sound!! Keep going... 👍👍

@heezyhines2209

11 ай бұрын

No he isn't 😂😂😂 kzread.info/dash/bejne/dJ6jya19eNOwn7g.html

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@muhammedandaisha5663

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 Bulugh al-Maram Book 11, Hadith 1352 Muslim transmitted... Anas bin Malik (RAA) which says, ‘ln case any of you any of us came to you, ***The Companions asked the Prophet (ﷺ),’O Messenger of Allah (ﷺ)! Will you write this down?’ He replied, “Yes.*** May Allah send out of His Mercy any of the Muslims who goes back to them. But Allah will grant a way out for anyone who comes to us from them.” Muhammed was literate and could read the Bible...

@muhammedandaisha5663

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 Muhammed has sex with children... Sahih al-Bukhari 5133 Narrated `Aisha: "that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was 6 years old and he consummated (sex) his marriage when she was 9 years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death)."... .... He is the worst of people...

@muhammedandaisha5663

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 MUHAMMED ALWAYS FORGETS HIS OWN QUR'AN!!! 🤣🤣🤣 Sunan Abi Dawud 907 Narrated Al-Miswar ibn Yazid al-Maliki: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) recited - Yahya (sub narrator) said: Sometimes al-Miswar said: I prayed along with the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) and witnessed that he recited - the Qur'an during the prayer and omitted something (i.e. some verses inadvertently) which he did not recite. A man said to him: Messenger of Allah, you omitted such-and-such verse. The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: WHY DID YOU NOT REMIND ME OF IT ?

Those scientific miracles aren't all that miraculous either.

A mere Myths and Legends!

@Adam Elmasri Good Work Brother! Can i Translate some of your Video to German to make the Informations you had given accesable to German Speqaking People? i would appreeciate!

I've also read that the Quran states to judge by the Gospels even though the Gospels state Jesus was in deed ressurected, which the quran also says did not happen. All that aside, you have to respect the beginning of the video.

@nostradamus522

4 ай бұрын

God speaks about the former revelations Thorah and Inghil ! But not the today’s Thorah or Bible. Both aren’t in the original form today . Not from Moses or Jesus Christ. That is a known fact.

@Futureyeti3

4 ай бұрын

@@nostradamus522 The Bible has not been corrupted. That is near impossible to accomplish. We have literally thousands of manuscripts or pieces of manuscripts that someone would have to obtain every single one, make changes while bidding their ink marks. Put them back where they found them and not let anyone know. That did not happen. Absolutely not a proven fact. Do some research

@pinoyfuntvph5457

4 ай бұрын

Meaning they are not witnesses to write what happened to Christ that is why Quran falsely tell a story about Jesus.😅😅😅😅

@kalulesudice1474

2 ай бұрын

Look for the hidden gospel of Apostle Banabus

@Futureyeti3

2 ай бұрын

@kalulesudice1474 a book that's not in the Bible for a reason. Try again

Quran said that Jesus and Muhammad both prophets that is a logical error. Jesus and Muhammad can not both were prophets since they cotradicted each other on the requirement for entering the heaven. Quran has historical, scientific, and logical errors. Muslims, please contemplate again, life after death is very important

let me add another historical error in quran , surah yusuf (chapter 12) verse 20 : And they sold him for a reduced price - a few dirhams - and they were, concerning him, of those content with little. historical error in these verse: 1) yusuf lived around late 1500 BC, 2) islamic world used dirham around late 7th Century.

لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله ...الله اكبر الله اكبر الله اكبر ولله الحمد

@ALIKN1-1

10 ай бұрын

شنو راح تفجر نفسك ؟؟؟!؟

@xynoxys

10 ай бұрын

​@@ALIKN1-1kaboom 😂😂

Great video. Bizarrely Al lah thinks Abrahams father was called Azar. Azar is a Persian female name. Genesis names Abrahams father as Terah.

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Dont lie to people. The name can be given to both Boys and Girls. It means "fire".

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

Izhar 😂😂

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

@@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS Azar is a common boys', girls', and last name in Persian-speaking countries.- Wikipedia.

@DDDSSDDDSSDDDSS

11 ай бұрын

@adamsayid6319 yeah it's my uncles name.

@lahleholivia7398

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 It is a girl's name. Tracy is an English girls name even though there are some men with this name, but it still a girl's name. Same with Azar.

when your friend copied ur work before submission, u got a sloppy scripture hence quran it is

Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched all in it 10:37

@AdamElmasriEnglish

2 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it! and thanks for your comment.

Great work sir...thank you.

poor reserch, let me correct you. 1. Samiri in the Quran 20:85 was not tribe. Samiri or the Samiri (Arabic: الْسَّامِريّ) is a phrase used by the Quran to refer to a rebellious follower of Moses who created the golden calf and attempted to lead the Hebrews into idolatry. According to the twentieth chapter of the Quran, Samiri created the calf while Moses was away for 40 days on Mount Sinai, receiving the Ten Commandments.[1] In contrast to the account given in the Hebrew Bible, the Quran does not blame Aaron for the calf’s creation. 2. The Arabic word used in Surah 19:28 is "يَـٰٓأُخْتَ" (ya'ukhta) which is translated to "O sister" This "O sister" doesn't mean "the literal sister"; it means "descendant". Referance: Surah 19:28 O sister [i.e., descendant] of Aaron, your father was not a man of evil, nor was your mother unchaste." - Saheeh International 3. talking about surah 28:38 And Pharaoh said, "O eminent ones, I have not known you to have a god other than me. Then ignite for me, O Hāmān, [a fire] upon the clay and make for me a tower that I may look at the God of Moses. And indeed, I do think he is among the liars." - Saheeh International In another translation, "brick and clay" is mentioned, which is not incorrect because the Quran doesn't mention water. Does that mean water wasn't used? Quran doesn't need to mention the whole process of making that tower; Quran just says that Pheroh wants to build the tower, and so he gives the order "ignite for me, O Hāmān, [a fire] upon the clay." Haman knows what to do next, so later on, if Haman uses rocks, stones, or other things, that doesn't matter. Lots of people come to disprove the Quran, but they fail like you did here.

@omarshabaan6918

10 ай бұрын

Thank you

@valentino3228

5 ай бұрын

The Quran gets the story of Mary (Miriam) the mother of Jesus totally wrong. In Surah 19:16-19 it talks about Allah making Mary pregnant with Jesus but then, while talking about the same Mary says that she is the sister of Aaron, Sura 19:27-28. No record exists saying Mary had a brother. Then in Sura 66:12 it says Mary, the mother of Jesus, her father was Amram (Imran) but all biblical accounts say Mary's father was Joachim. But guess what? In 1 Chronicles 6:3:2-4 it speaks that 1300yrs before Jesus, Amram (Imran) had 3 children Aaron, Moses and Miriam.

@valentino3228

5 ай бұрын

The problem with Aaron being called the sister of Mary, lies on the fact that if Aaron lived 1300 earlier, the Quran would have referred to Aaron as the father of Mary and not the brother, because it is supposedly referring to descendance or lineage. The scenario gets worsened when Sura 66:12 refers to Imram as the father of Mary (mother of Jesus) when we all know Imram was the father of Moses, Aaron and Miriam who lived 1300 years earlier. Two discrepancies of thie kind cannot be overlooked: -Surah 19 says that Aaron was the brother of Mary (mother of Jesus) -Surah 66 says that Imram was the father of Mary (mother of Jesus) This definitely does not show a descendance, this shows a direct family linkage.

@FuzioEsitama

5 ай бұрын

@@valentino3228 I suggest you to read my comment again, I have explained all, why its Brother even though there is no blood relation. In a nutshell it because of "tribe"

@valentino3228

5 ай бұрын

@@FuzioEsitama It's not a tribe, because Imram is referred as the father (not the brother) of Mary (mother of Jesus), it's a direct family linkage. Quran refers Aaron as the brother of May (mother of Jesus) and Imram as the father of Mary (mother of Jesus) There cannot be 2 obvious discrepancies there, it is obviously not referring to a descendance, it refers to direct bother-sister and father-daughter relationship. Another thing is the perspective that you want to adopt to fit the standard Islamic narrative.

Truth prevailed

Wow, well done! I knew about Mary but the other two are entirely new to me. This book is 100% man made, and you explaining this should be seem by millions. Hats off for your research!

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

Claim 1 - As-Samiri does NOT mean a Samaritan. There was for example, the rebel Hebrew leader Zimri, and Samiri being a distortion of that, such as David to Dawud (the Hebrews being semitic, prob was Dawud or something close to it), so your claim is baseless. Claim 2 - And it's just as that hadith says, as you conveniently decided to skip over. Even today, in tradition, we are referred to by the names of pious people. For example I am called son of Adam - does that mean I am literally the biological son of Adam? no. (my name is adam it's confusing lol). Us muslims are brothers to one another, so I can be called the brother of Muhammad (P.B.U.H). Does that mean I am his biological brother? no. Also, there is a whole chapter called Al-Imran - chapter 3 of the Quran, the family of Imran. The Imran described here is very very clearly a different one to the father of Moses, as you can read (you probably wont). Let me use the same logic again, I am Adam, the first human was called Adam. Am I the first human? no. You are egyptian and therefore should be familiar with arab and islamic culture, do not try to trick the masses. Critical thinking my backside. Claim 3 - The meaning of Haman is literally "Head of the Stone Quarries Workers" - it is a title, not a name. This is not a mistaken identity case, nor is it a person's name. Don't try to claim so. And on bricks -" As of 11 Jun 2023, it is possible to make a tall tower out of bricks using modern engineering knowledge and production techniques.2 A normal 2x2 Lego brick weighs just 1.152g, which can be used to calculate how many bricks are needed to create the 950 pounds that the brick at the bottom of a tower could take.13 To build a tower out of LEGO bricks, attach bricks to the baseplate to build the base of the tower with four walls of equal lengths. As you build upwards, stagger the seams of the bricks so that the tower tapers toward the top, like a real skyscraper. To save bricks for a taller tower, only build the exterior walls.0 A five-foot tall LEGO model uses up a whole lot of bricks, making it just second to the LEGO Art World Map in terms of brick count.4 It would take 375,000 bricks towering 3.5km (2.17 miles) high to break a Lego brick." It very much IS possible - and with Ancient Egyptian technology being a marvel to even us I'm sure they wouldnt have had much of a problem.

@kaloarepo288

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 Overall the Koran is a trainwreck of a book -just have to look at how it is arranged to see how woeful it is! As someone once said it looks as if someone was collecting the reputed sayings of Mohammad when a big wind blew up and blew all the bits away and they had to rush out and collect them one by one but couldn't remember the arrangement so they finally just stuck the shortest bits in first and the long ones last - like a child's scrapbook. And it's as boring as hell and every page tends to end with threats of hell fire and the horrible torments of hell. Give me a break -and I'm supposed to take this stuff seriously? Don't waste my time.

@Daash27

11 ай бұрын

​@@adamsayid6319 Dumb and nonsensical dawah boy. "We don't believe you need more people".

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

@kaloarepo288

11 ай бұрын

@@sifat1730 You have been brainwashed perfectly and spout stuff like a parrot that has been given words to repeat over and over again - you have to do better than that if you are to convince people who can actually think!

I love you, Adam. ❤ From a Brazilian guy

@conociendoelislam85

11 ай бұрын

@André D, is he great? I am a colombian lady, it id my first time listening his videos!

@andred7684

11 ай бұрын

@@conociendoelislam85 Sí que lo es.

This was quite a logical and historical, quite easy to win, challenge for me. As for the first argument, it raised a basic question in logic: Is condition A a necessary unique condition to prove Statement B ? a counter example is sufficient here: Too many cities, also countries were named after famous individuals (after they died) or houses: - Columbus, Ohio was named after Christopher Columbus. - Saudi Arabia was named after house "Al Saud" There are even more older historical counter examples. Also given the fact, that eventhough grammatically Al Samiri might seem a relative name to a known entity, that still not necessarily true. And the origin of geographical namings are actually relative to mostly either atributes or already existing names. And as for the 3rd argument, I mean you went straight away by ridiculing the "author" saying " he has no idea what he's talking about". Please Go check how the ancient Egyptians made the building blocks (bricks). The material they used is specifically SOIL RICH IN CLAY. The process they used is amazing and inspired civilizations, that is based on mixing, molding, drying and stacking. The techniques were to renenforce and harden the bricks so it doesn't crumble over time. You missed out a whole incredible construction process coming from your own heritage, as I suppose, just for the sake of accusing the Quran. Well, that's how you LOSE CREDIBILITY. I personally wouldn't even trust the rest of your content as you're very opinionated and driven by your very personal motives against Islam (it's clear even from the terms you're using)

remember an "error" according to your understanding does not make it an error in the quran.

In the thirty-first year of Asa the king of Judah, Omri ruled over Israel twelve years-in Tirzah, he ruled six years.23 ‏And he bought the hill Samaria of Shemer for two talents of silver; and he built on the hill, and called the name of the city which he built, after the name of Shemer, the owner of the hill, Samaria.24

You are a brilliant man Adam

Biblical scolars acknowledge that Moses probably never existed and the exodus didn't happen the way the bible describes it - so the koranic version makes no sense either

@sifat1730

11 ай бұрын

There is non God but Allah! And Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) is his servant and messenger!!! ALLAHUAKBAR ✌️

The book of Isaiah uses the term Samaritan in a differing way when talking about a disloyal Israel Israel would also be referred to as Sodom Even though it was not the literal city of Sodom and Gomorrah

@123buraikake4

5 ай бұрын

source please chap and verse pliz

@pinoyfuntvph5457

4 ай бұрын

Only blah blah hahahaha proved it pls.....

Sorry for my miss spelling of certain words. But next time I have a big encounter with Jesus ill record it besides people speaking in toungs and so on. But I will test people God's even the one my family serve. I'm more into finding truth I just don't take it from other people I look it up for myself. And I'm not aiming this just at Muslims im saying Jews or whatever. No I haven't experienced anyone being raised from the dead or nothing like that just healing so far but I am going to test Jesus more but I have been on the up and down because I'm more of a relationship type person not a religious like person. But I'm not good at relationships like at all I really suck at having it with people and this God to. I have been so consumed with Demon attacks or I have been falling on my butt all round with this salvation thing im just wow I suck and I kind of understand why most people get Jesus wrong. But don't worry I am testing the Quran to ok folks to see which Bible God awnserss 2. Im still testing it and this time ill will record to bad I can't put the video on the comment section so I guess I'll have to put it on my thing. I just never thought of recording anything because I'm in a moment but I'm not sure God voice would appear on a recording since he talking directly to someone. He might I don't know its hard to say. But we will see ok I hope I remember though. I don't test history when it comes to a Bible i test the God who comes with it but thats just me I guess. I prefer a Elijah approach to things but like I said we will see ok I won't make any promises.

Great video! I would like to add that the story of Mary (mother of Jesus) in the Quran is in some points similar to the story of Mary in the Protoevangelium of James, worth to check :) Lloyd De Jongh has analysed that in one of his video.

@WayOfJannah

11 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/lWaj2KuFk8LZe7w.html

@adamsayid6319

11 ай бұрын

the point is? some of the true story of Jesus and his mother Mary has been preserved in the bible or other sources, whereas most has been changed. In any case this proves that both the Bible and Quran were originally from God (the Quran still is.)

@polokucoch8112

11 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 When you say God are you meaning allah? So are allah's sacred words eternal or not?

@ac8907

9 ай бұрын

@@adamsayid6319 How can you say the Qu’ran is from God and not the Bible ?

@adamsayid6319

9 ай бұрын

@@ac8907 im not denying that there was a revelation to Jesus that originated from Allah, but it was corrupted over the millenia. There are no contradictions, errors of any sort in the Quran, proof of its preservation and origin from Allah. If you want to say whats in this video are 3 historical errors - well im sorry the claims were debunked a few days after this video was posted.

In every video you look more helw. 🌹🌹🌹

So, according to the bible, Aaron is to blame, but you can't believe that samir can't be a person even though it clearly says it was a person .In the Quran Aaron did not disobey his brother Moses it was Samir.

Adam clearly a man who knows his Beans. Interesting and informative.

Go ahead Adam

This video was great. Great job!

Also, quran mentions masjid al-aqsa, when it didn't exist during Mohameds time, but built many decades later by Umayyad rulers.. quran also mentions Dinar as money currency, but it was only introduced many decades later.. quran also says jews consider Ezra as son of god..😮

@parlindungandongoran3180

11 ай бұрын

Masjid mean the place for sujud

@roshlew6994

3 ай бұрын

@@parlindungandongoran3180 So, what is masjid Al-aqsa mentioned in quran?

@parlindungandongoran3180

3 ай бұрын

@@roshlew6994 all prophets practicing sujud

@roshlew6994

3 ай бұрын

@@parlindungandongoran3180 Where is it located?

@parlindungandongoran3180

3 ай бұрын

@@roshlew6994 we just believe that all prophets practicing sujud as muhammad did and aqsa mentioned in quran and ibrahim ishaq ismail yaqub ect the were all muslims

hi, id like to just point out some things. the first thing is that the place u mentioned samaria yes it was founded after the alleged time of moses. but the king He bought the hill of Samaria from Shemer. the name samaria was already a known title for the region. and the second thing about maryam yes that is a good point but you know the quran isnt a hisorical book nor a science book the whole purpose is to extract lessons that will help guide u morally. besieds the point multiple verses in the quran use the same words for sibling relations sometimes brother sometimes sister the point is that theres multiple verses where the word that relatets them as siblings isnt used for literall siblings. to add on to this in exodus its mentioned that aaron worshiped the golden calf. so a very strong reason for the jews back then to call her sister of aaron is because they assume she commited illegal intercourse. she did a unexpected thing and betrayed her familys moral creed. which has a strong connection to how they viewed aaron. and the last point about the clay baking. you put up a picture of the pyramids of ghiza which where more then 1000 years before moses. but assuming u meant general pyrmids. the quran never said the pharaoh built a pyramid. i dont know why u thought it was a pyramid could u explain please. and the upper parts of the ancient pyramids where built using baked clay. but thats redundent the pyramids where build way before moses was alive. i encourage free rational thinking and honestly it doesnt matter what religon u follow just believe in 1 higher power do good and be fair and thankful. the quran is a lot diffrent the hadiths.

Specail focus on the last part. It is obvious from the last Arabic letter ya' that Samiri was not the proper name of the person, for this Arabic letter is always added to show a person's connection with his race or clan or place. Moreover, the prefix al (definite article 'the') in the original Arabic text clearly denotes that the Samiri was a particular man from among many other persons of the same race or clan or place, who had propagated the worship of the golden calf. In fact, this does not require any further explanation than this, but this has been necessitated because many Christian missionaries and the Western Orientalists have tried to criticize the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the Quran on this account. They say, (God forbid ) "This is a proof of the grievious ignorance of history on the part of Muhammad (peace be upon him), the author of the Quran, and is one of the anachronisms of the Quran. They base this absurd criticism on the assumption that this Samiri was the inhabitant of Samaria, the capital of the ancient kingdom of Israel, which was built in 925 B.C. long after this happening; then centuries after this, a generation of the Samaritans came into existence as a result of inter-marriage between the Israelites and the non-Israelites. As the Samaritans worshiped the golden calf, the critics accuse the Prophet (peace be upon him) of inventing this storv on the basis of mere hearsay They say that the Prophet (peace be upon him) might have heard something like this from the neighboring Jews and inserted it in the Quran. That is not all. They also criticize that Haman who was a courtier of Cyrus has been mentioned in the Quran as a minister of Pharaoh. It is a pity that these so called scholars seem to think that in the ancient times there used to be only one person bearing one name in a clan or a place, and there was absolutely no possibility of another person or persons having the same name. They do not know, or pretend they do not know, that during the time of Prophet Abraham (peace be upon him), a famous people known as the Sumerians inhabited Iraq and the neighboring regions, and it is just possible that during the time of Prophet Moses (peace be upon him) there were some people known as the Samiris who might have migrated to Egypt from Iraq. Besides this, according to the Bible (1 Kings, 16:24), Samaria itself was built on a hill which was bought from Shemer and named Samaria after him. This is a clear proof that there were people named Shemer (or Sumer) even before Samaria came into existence and it is also just possible that some clans might have been called Samiri.

Very interesting!

Excellent!