Thanks for your great review, combined with some real world feedback and lovely footage. This is definitely on my wish list for hiking, but will take quite a while to save up all the necessary pennies... Greetings from across the pond.

Thank you for the comprehensive review of the RX100 VII. Your content was spot on for this camera. For its size I haven't found anything that compares. Even at this October 21 posting. I did buy this camera for all the reasons you mentioned. Excellent image quality and features in such a compact size. Just great when you don't want to lug the gear & have the capability of creating outstanding results with such a small camera. Yes, the price has remained high & for good reason. I have no regrets for the purchase. This camera will remain viable for awhile. Thank you for your excellent assessment & content. Best Always.....

And I love that you share photos on a weekly basis.

I own both the V and VII versions of this camera and I use the V for photos (especially in low light) and the VII is now my video rig. LOVE LOVE LOVE them. I was never happy with focus speeds until I bought the V in 2018. Gave my Sony ILC5000 away because it was TOO SLOW TO FOCUS IN LOW LIGHT grrrrr

Great video and commentary. As always lots of information.

A truly interesting option and one of the best reviews I have seen of it. I am seriously considering one of these. A few years ago I got tired of carrying all my junk around with me. I went to MFT and I liked it. I got a 1” superzoom and found that I was using it more than my MFT stuff. Because it’s easier to carry one and several lenses. But if only I had something with similar capabilities but much smaller? Ow I just need to convince myself to spend that kind of money on a tiny camera. I may have to work up to it.

Ive had it for a few weeks - it's truly amazing to have a 200mm optical lens that literally fits in my jeans pocket. I wish it was slightly faster at 200mm (best aperture at this length is 4.5) but like the saying goes - the best camera is the one you are carrying and many times while traveling, my DSLR gets to be a bit much. Rather than solely relying on my phone when I don't want to bother with the DSLR, this has been a great option.

I love your videos. I live in Germany, but grew up in Paradise Valley, so your AZ shots are a particular treat. Keep up the good work!

@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp

2 ай бұрын

You got this one right. If you are looking for a real challenge when it comes to lighting - AZ is the place.

Well argued observations. You are right about sticking with the simplicity of the camera, especially with regard to external mics etc.

Excellent informative review. I have had this camera quite awhile and every once in awhile I get it out and am amazed by what it will do. I was out hiking at Marcus Landslide and saw a cactus wren. I aimed the camera without looking at the lcd and snapped away. When I got home I found those fotos in perfect focus! Great camera except it can be noisy in low light.

what a brillant and full overview on this camera, thanks

Thank you for a very helpful review of the SONY RX100Vii

Hey SnapChick -- One of the most helpful and intelligent reviews I've seen on this camera. Hope you can find room for it in your collection.

the zoom range on this camera is insane!! i can’t wait to buy it

Great review Leigh, and trust me I have watched many.

excellent explanation , very clear views

I like using the illustration effect on that camera :)

Great overview! Waiting for mine to arrive!..🔥🔥🔥

Thanks for the overview...Nice job with it. - A couple of questions on it: 1) Did you try any high-speed video for super slow motion? (I think this model has up to 960fps?) 2) Did you try shooting any video of the birds flying. If so, how did it do at keeping the bird in focus during flight? Thanks again

This review was one of the best done I've seen - a great combo of use case and demo / review. Not too technical OR too high level. My current predicament - I have an A6000 with a 24-70F4 and 35mm 2.8, but I don't bring it anywhere as it is too bulky to always carry with me. I loved my Canon S100 but it's getting long in the tooth and lacks zoom range. I'm tempted to trade in my A6000 gear for the RX100 VII. I'm worried primarily about the low light performance of this camera for indoor shots in average indoor light without flash. I much prefer using available light and limiting the use of flash, especially for 'people shots' wide open and wide angle. How did this perform for that use case? Also - for handheld/braced outdoor stills in night time 'street photography' with available light - similar to what the phone manufacturers are touting with 'computational photography' - would this stack up even at F2.8? Thank you for your insight!!!

Ive got this camera and im still blown away with what one can get with such a small camera

@martinaee

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah, like she said, I totally want one as my smaller walk-around camera sometimes, but I can't justify the price. I think there are a lot of options out there for a small good camera.

@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp

2 ай бұрын

I am still struggling with exploiting what this camera actually offers.

That’s simply a cool camera for street photography. Small and great autofocus.

Great review. The camera is really appealing. Much food for thought. Thank you very much.

I picked this up with the Ricoh GR III Street Edition. You can one-hand both: guns akimbo! I'm slowly selling my regular focal length lens for my ILC and will likely keep a few primes and my wildlife lenses.

Great and helpful review. I'd love to see your comparable review of the Sony HX99.

Love this camera

Just bought mine today. Looking forward to diving in to all the features.

@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp

2 ай бұрын

Good luck - have fun - and never forget. Ultimately - cameras are here to create in a fraction of a second memories for a lifetime. In other words - they are too expensive to be used "as toys to play with"

Great review!

Great review thanks! When do you think the RX100 VIII will come out?

Awesome Review Thank you

Thanks. Very Clear ReView....

Great review. What is the best point and shoot camera now in 2022?

thanks for the review....as a super noobie that has already purchased this camera it is the most helpful I have seen. As a noobie, for wildlife/outdoor shots would you suggest just leaving it on AF?

Great review 👍

Thanks for the review, detailed and charming as ever. But one point: didn't you use the EVF? You didn't mention it.

@dalejones146

2 жыл бұрын

She did mention it but not in much detail.

I'm at the point in life that if I don't want to pack my Nikon D750 along, which by the way is very seldom....I'll use my iPhone 7+! We've gone through the small pocket size camera's (usually Lumix) and we're done with them. I'd rather put the $$ of this camera in with some more, and work upwards of the D850...or beyond that at some point personally. If/when Nikon moves upwards on the Z series with dual card slots, that might even be acceptable, but I still love the DSLR, and will stick with them until the end before moving forward. Thanks Leigh!

As a fellow adventurer, I really appreciate this video; thank you. I explain my needs more in this comment, but my question to you and anyone reading this comment is if you'd caution me against buying it, knowing what you know now. I'm up in the mountains at least 3x/wk mountain biking, climbing, and snowboarding. I used to shoot slr, but just got SO TIRED of lugging that setup around everywhere. I was going to buy a flagship phone, solely for the camera (#1 priority is that it HAS to fit in my pocket), but then I happened upon the Sony and Canon cameras duking it out and I'm pretty much sold on the Sony because of the 200mm zoom ability, as well as the ability to access photos on my phone. I primarily shoot landscape, with a little adventure sports photog, so those are my primary uses, although I do take photos of the kids and whatnot. The cost between the Canon and Sony doesn't really bother me, particularly given how much more zoom I'd get with the Sony. THAT SAID, I have always rather enjoyed the texture of Canon photographs; they have a slight bit more "film" feel to them, at least IMO. Do you feel like that's maintained in the G5XII and/or G7XIII? Anyway, based on what I'm saying here, any red flags you'd raise as I consider the Sony?

@LeighAndRaymond

2 ай бұрын

I haven’t used a Canon point and shoot for a long time but I’m confident in saying that the colors will absolutely be more natural coming out of them. Sony colors are challenging if you want that natural look without having to make extensive adjustments to your settings. That being said, the Sony is amazing. The smart autofocus and zoom are really nice to have. :)

Great upgrade from your nikon 1 system

I know the camera has explanations using the C/Garbage can button but not always thorough enough and at 12:49 you mentioned the PDF and downloading it to the camera. Is it possible to describe that briefly how that would be done? Thanks & just bought one open box because of your review 💯👌🏽📸

Leigh, do you own a “point and shoot”? Which one if you don’t mind. And would you keep the Sony if it were cheaper? Thanks, you have come a long way since the early days of Snap Chick. Kudos! Raymond is a very lucky guy.

Question re rx100v vs rx100vii. The rx100 v has a faster lense f1.8- f2.8 vs. f2.8 f4.5however the vii has a 24-200telphoto vs the iv 24-70. Which choice makes the most sense for you ? I have Sony rx100iv and shot 2000 clicks in Europe in 2017 and shot raw and jpeg. Wiith simple editing the pictures quality was excellent. The camera was ripped off when return my rental car so now I am evaluating another Rx 100m5 or M7 vs the Sony mirrorless a7riii. These little compact cameras are liberating because you can go on living life and have your camera too. I carried a Nikon DSLR for decades and I take more pictures with the compact because I always have it. I am a enthusiast and the BURDEN of hauling gear around with even a mirrorless format because of multiple lens and body weight. Three plus pounds, cubic inches, is less preferable than the convinces of using a compact, in my opinion. Plus the capability of the Sony is extremely creative for Architecture , Landscape and Video. Nice video.

I love mine too, coming from Nikon Full Frame, this is great

@Festvangelist

3 жыл бұрын

Had a Nixon dating back to 1970. The compact camera ( especially Sony) is liberating yet a creative tool to work with.

@BernhardSchwarz-xs8kp

2 ай бұрын

If nothing else but the weight lol lol lol

Irrespective of photography technology - when it comes to packing all the features including the wide range zoom lens - at that weight - this camera wins hands down.

How did you edit the video exposure and colors of the grand canyon ? Can you transfer video to smartphone? (With the a7iii you cant)

This seems like it would be a great camera for traveling? Been wanting something to travel with internationally and was originally looking at the a6600, but that setup seems so bulky with body+lenses for traveling. Thoughts?

I have the MK V version of this camera and I really want the external Mic Input option now available in the MK VII :( Looks like Sony *incrementally uncrippled* the DSC RX 100 model camera with the 7th iteration.

@Festvangelist

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. The f2.8 - f4 is not a deal breaker for me.

I know it is a smaller sensor, and relatively expensive, but in a lot of ways I feel it might be a better option than say the @6400.

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

It's tough to beat the size!

@Festvangelist

3 жыл бұрын

The size and creativity in this camera exceeds the 6400 in size and performance...a 24-200 zoom. Wow. The price is cheap compared to moving into Mirrorless with multiple lenses.

Very nice detailed review, would you take this on vacation rather than an iPhone 11 or is the IQ on the Sony much better?

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

I would definitely take it on vacation - the range it gives you is the important part for me.

Go to the top of the class a comprehensive and common sense description of the camera, Sony should gift you one

Did you use Superior Auto Mode to shoot in low light? If yes, were you satisfied? I bought the rx100 vii to provide me with an improved option in low light situations instead of using my iphone. I hoped the 1” sensor would be better. However, after using the rx100 vii for several weeks, I’m unsure as to whether it is better than the iphone in low light situations. The rx100 vii often produces a noisy image in low light. It took me three months to decide on whether to purchase the rx100 vii because of its high price and f/2.8-4.5 range.

Ever tried a RX10 IV?

do you use UV filter for the lens if so what adapter do you use?

How does it perform in low light conditions???

Compaired to earlier versions this has a much longer zoom range. Did you use the range between 70-200 a lot, or would a 24-70 be enough? I am guessing that the rabbit is caught with 200....

@SvenSchumacher

4 жыл бұрын

It was also a difficult decision for me. I miss the light sensitivity at the longer focal length. But the predecessor with the faster lens lacks the better processor with the faster autofocus and the stronger slow motion. Unfortunately, in the course of development there are things that get worse while others have become much better. Especially in nature a good telephoto lens is irreplaceable. Even in sports you don't want to do without the longer focal length. So which RX100 is the right one has to be adjusted to your own needs. If the RX100 V is enough, you save a lot of money. Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

So here is a question with recording audio to videos (even though the onboard mic and sound quality is great) could you not plug a small mic like the Rode Video Go mic for cellphones in to pick up a little better audio? Just curious. Also does it do 24 Frames per second in 4K and 120 Frames per second in 1080P? This might be a good option for a second run & gun vlogging camera if those are possible

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

You can definitely use a plug-in lavalier mic! Also, yes on both video questions. :)

@mikebray48

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeighAndRaymond awesome I am seriously considering it as a run & gun vlogging camera. I'm starting my own KZread channel soon doing photography tutorials, travel & home lifestyle vlogs and gear reviews. I am going all out (thanks to receiving a sizeable settlement from an accident I was in 2 years ago) and going to buy a lot of gear.. for my photography... Nikon D850... for video... Nikon Z6 Filmmaker's Kit, DJI Osmo Action, DJI Mavic Air and an Insta360 One X. The Sony RX100 VII may just be added to the list now.

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

I wish you luck in your video-making! :)

@mikebray48

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeighAndRaymond Thank you...I was going over my list of gear I am planning on buying last night and decided to wait on the Z6 or just get the body with the FTZ adapter instead of the entire kit, seeing as I am going to retire my D3200 and upgrade to the D850. I am thinking the D850 with the Weebils for more B Roll footage and some vlogging plus the Sony for the rest. As well I am getting a DJI Osmo Action for some of my vlogging and B Roll, plus a DJI Mavic Air for drone footage and an Insta360 for other B Roll footage. They will all compliment each other nicely for awesome footage for my videos. Plus my new D850 is going to be my business camera and workhorse for my photography

@mikebray48

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeighAndRaymond I have also decided to use the Rode GO wireless microphone system for recording my audio as I watched a few reviews on it and love the sound it provides and it's compatible with both the Nikon and Sony cameras

Did you buy it subsequently?

Im struggling to decide if I want this in my right pocket when I have a iPhone 11 Pro in my left pocket already!

@razakidris

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha.. tough one. I think if you don't do much zooming photography, the iPhone is good enough. 11pro is good for photography & video shoot.

Is the rx100va have the same quick af, I like the 1.8-2.8. Tnx

@Festvangelist

3 жыл бұрын

No it is not f2.8 - f4 but it also packs a 24-200 lenses vs the faster f1.8 - f2.8 24-70. I would prefer the 24-200 and get a shallow depth of field using a bigger telephoto and keep the iso500 or less.

Sony be like, lets make the perfect point and shoot and forget about the pros using our full frame

Is it worth the 1600$ cad? With tax 2k!$. I only shoot stills and don't edit. Thanks and thanks for this great review.

I have the Mark V version, wondering if I should upgrade to the VII for the 200mm equivalent reach. I like sharp photos and only print up to 11” x 14” prints. If I have been very careful and check my settings, I have been reasonably satisfied with the results from my V. I have an older Sony A7 that I use with my old Minolta lenses, and actually prefer the results from my Mk V. Any thoughts on Mk VII sharpness using the longer zoom?

Rx100 mk 5 owner here do not want to upgrade yet.

For those complaining about the high price, the "V" version of this camera is for sale at MPB.com for $525 in Excellent used condition. (I bought it from them a year ago.) The Mark V version is really, really good, too (and, in some instances, even better than the "VII.") It also has a 20.1 mp sensor, though the V's is different. The V has a 24-70mm lens, but it's faster at F1.8-2.8. It also has a zoom ring. It doesn't, however, have the mic jack of the VII.

@reggersbach24

4 жыл бұрын

Love the idea and tempted

Why not show non raw ?/ JPEG is a good one to show!!

LOL I thought this camera was going to cost WAYYY less. Nice, but holy crap that's a lot for it. Aren't there FF mirrorless cams now for much less than that out? I would love one of these as a walkaround/street camera, but it's too pricy for me!

@razakidris

4 жыл бұрын

It's strength is 'compact'. You could literally put it in your front pocket yet delivering DSLR quality.

@williamjackson7964

4 жыл бұрын

Razak Idris kJ

Good review SC.. But it's just too small for me... My pocket is the last thing I think about when I buy a camera.. Just sayin 😉👍👍

not sure why one wouldn't just buy a 6500, EXCEPT for the fact you want to 'put it in your pocket'... even then with cargo pants you can fit a 6xxxx in your pocket.

@scraymond5597

4 жыл бұрын

It's the lenses that may be more difficult to fit in pocket with the a6xxx cameras.

Hi, Can you tell me if you still use the Canon M50? What are it's pros and cons?

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

I've never used the Canon M50. I did have an SL2/200D but recently sold it. I liked it though!

@jgagich2

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeighAndRaymond What is the equivalent of a Nikon compared to a SL2/200D? I liked the mechanics of the SL2 but kind of switched to looking at mirrorless which is why I looked at the M50

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

If you want mirrorless, Nikon just released the Z50. Raymond shared our first video about it today ( kzread.info/dash/bejne/d56Hw7dmaLW8m7w.html ) and a full review will be coming soon. Also, Sony has some great APS-C options. I used the a6400 earlier this year when it was launched and enjoyed it ( kzread.info/dash/bejne/nYyMlamsaNHamZM.html ) but they have other options too!

I wouldn't buy this camera. I would buy an a6400 instead. I have an hx99 that has nearly the same feature with a smaller sensor. It does the small camera work I need ...no prob. I don't think you can justify the cost of this camera easily.

Nice review of a great camera but I'd have a hard time paying $1300 for a P&S camera.

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

I would have said the same thing until I used it. I'm still considering purchasing it!

@razakidris

4 жыл бұрын

@@LeighAndRaymond 5 months on... so, have you got it? If you haven't, you should coz I'm still rocking the RX100 'OG'. 😘

Powerful (expensive) compact camera but pocketable ??? Only if one has very large pockets or one stretches those pockets. Very high quality but far too complex for a "point and shoot" camera.

The audio seems usually harsh.

Since it has no ND filter it is useless in bright environments whilst maintaining 24fps for video.

@karlcountry2363

3 жыл бұрын

I bought an nd filter that attaches to the camera.

why go with this limited camera when you can buy A6400 at the same price

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

The a6400 is awesome but the point of this camera, or me, is lots of range in a tiny package. :)

Similar to the Leica version I have. Ok for family shots but not a serious camera. But they do fit into your jacket pocket.

You did a great review, But This Camera is Not a point and shoot I got this just before the lockdown here in NZ and it did hurt the pocket at $1930 NZdollars and they trough in a spare battery in After using this little Pocketable A9 I'm finding it as one of the best cameras i have Its great for Mtbing, Tramping and trail Running Been Shooting in Jpeg B&W and raw just colour Look young lady just go and get the camera you won't regret this little Pocket A9 Mark Galer has free tutorials on this camera and The Alpha series They are worth paying for Thank you

It's easy for her to praise this camera since it's a free loaner. Coincidence?

Tiny Camera, Many Uses AND HIGH PRICE. Well, it's a Sony, what else could we expect?

@LeighAndRaymond

4 жыл бұрын

To me, the price isn't out of line with the capability of the camera.

Many of these images are horrendously bad. I have this camera. It's fun to use but it really has its limitations.

@MikeLikesChannel

5 ай бұрын

200mm in your pocket is the USP. Full frame A7 200mm? Nope. Fit in your pocket? Absolutely.

A lady who likes a small package

She’s lovely and hot ❤️❤️

@michaelpaulhodson2625

Жыл бұрын

Which is probably not something you are.

another gear review channel talking about a camera you dont need.