Ah yes, a Fighter Jet so bad that 14 countries are buying it with more attempting to

@wuwangjingunderground4001

Жыл бұрын

Nato country pressured to buy american to keep up with americans, not allowed to make their own.

@curious5887

Жыл бұрын

You called it bad because your warmind is still stuck in the 70s, while F-35 is for warfare where dogfight no longer a thing, and also where drone, laser and beyond visual range hypersonic missile are a thing, it's time for you to stop reading mainstream media with negative opinion on it, and started reading Ground News, plus, watch LazerPig video about F-35

@g2gridiqarri561

Жыл бұрын

This Video has aged so well! 😂😂

@neutralprofit7699

Жыл бұрын

Scam

@just_some_bigfoot_hacking_you

Жыл бұрын

Vox: "Why F-35 jet is a disaster?" F-35B: "You were saying?"

This jet is so amazing it can do multiple things -attack aircraft -attack ground units -and even destroy defense budgets!!

@VP-fx3nf

5 жыл бұрын

It destroyed defense budgets using stealth!! The future!!

@gigapak28

5 жыл бұрын

It’s pumping money into the economy what else does America need a defence budget for?

@michaeltalbot8242

5 жыл бұрын

And industries in others too

@VP-fx3nf

5 жыл бұрын

@@michaeltalbot8242 for now but not many countries are buying the plane man

@dumdumbinks274

5 жыл бұрын

@@VP-fx3nf There are just as many countries buying the F-35 as there were buying the F-16 in the 1980s.

He protecc He atacc But most importantly He eat budget for a snacc

@jrfirefiher

4 жыл бұрын

smart lol

@last5902

3 жыл бұрын

😂 genius

@thefatjapanesepufferfish1906

3 жыл бұрын

Nice

@cubitsinformatica7544

3 жыл бұрын

hahahahahaha

@joshuahardee8837

3 жыл бұрын

This is perfect.

this didn't aged well

@jaspercaelan4998

Ай бұрын

Not really, it's not economical to operate. Better off investing in UCAVs now. Planes with pilots in are the past.

@bluestorm9977

Ай бұрын

@@jaspercaelan4998 Nothing's better than being in the plane itself and getting a feel for every movement you make. Being completely aware of your surroundings when in an air battle is also a plus.

@jaspercaelan4998

Ай бұрын

@@bluestorm9977 UAV's are cheaper, instead of having all the necessary weight and equipment to support a pilot it can carry more weapons and other things, make much higher G maneuvers, fly in swarms, be more stealthy etc..

@mlcs

Ай бұрын

​@@jaspercaelan4998an F-35 costs per hour the same as an F-16 would

@jaspercaelan4998

Ай бұрын

@@mlcs It isn't, it's nearly double.

Amazon would have delivered the F-35 in 2 days free shipping.

@FakeSchrodingersCat

5 жыл бұрын

The Amazon F-35 would be made in China

@Rali272

5 жыл бұрын

schrodingers cat amazon has an incredible warranty policy. Even if made in China just know you covered.

@MikeBrown-ex9nh

4 жыл бұрын

Just to be stolen by a porch pirate.

@lmao.3661

4 жыл бұрын

@@FakeSchrodingersCat j-31

@jackssrv

4 жыл бұрын

@@Rali272 warranty reimbursement means little to a dead pilot

First time Vox is agreeing with President Trump's comment

@blumac9801

4 жыл бұрын

Dhanushka Jayasinghe I wish he was a good person...

@murdzstang2777

4 жыл бұрын

First time Trump was right

@joshuadxlee

4 жыл бұрын

@@zer0nero finally somebody with sense

@lefteristerezakis9304

4 жыл бұрын

@@zer0nero although i despise obama , people call trump racist because of the things he says and the Rhetoric he is using. Calling mexicans rapists murderers( and i guees some of them good people..) having truble properly denounce white supremistists, having racist backround in his bussiness, and the list goes on

@lefteristerezakis9304

4 жыл бұрын

@@zer0nero and at the end of the day i dont really think people care if he actually is a racist, the problem is that he is giving a platform to racists and he is anebling their actions.

Jobs? Acquired. Budget? Destroyed. Plane? Delayed. Hotel? Trivago.

@kayruwijaya3901

3 жыл бұрын

Spanish inquisition

@last5902

3 жыл бұрын

British empire

@blasted4094

3 жыл бұрын

United States

@rahuldutt3846

2 жыл бұрын

Food sushi

5 years later, and this did not age well.

@dxwkx9119

Жыл бұрын

Even said the B variant can take off vertically

@steephanroy8461

Жыл бұрын

This aged like wine.. can't even replace f 16

@dxwkx9119

Жыл бұрын

@@steephanroy8461 Why's that?

@joshiderniemalslacht8398

Жыл бұрын

​@@steephanroy8461 It was never supposed to fully take over the role of the F-16. The F-16 will probably stay in use to perform tasks for which the F-35 is simply overkill. The F-35 is probably going to be used for stealth missions. Something the F-16 would not be capable of due to its rather big radar cross section.

@steephanroy8461

Жыл бұрын

@@joshiderniemalslacht8398 this stealth technology is several decades old. Even the yogoslavs shot down one.. they are perfectly detectable with long wavelength radars.. f 35 . It's truly a design to be a cash cow for lockheed that is its one and only purpose and is doing it splendedly.

Eisenhower is probably rolling in his grave saying I told you so.

@Dave-ui6xn

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, I mean as soon as this thing is combat ready we start selling it to other countries. LOL

@kmc.727

5 жыл бұрын

The military industrial complex.. He warned us all.

@fortherepublic1263

4 жыл бұрын

I was just thinking that, my friend!

@nyvdrtngryd

4 жыл бұрын

𝑅𝒪𝐿𝐿𝐼𝒩𝒢 𝐼𝒩 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝒢𝑅𝒜𝒜𝒱𝒱𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸!!

@cr4yv3n

4 жыл бұрын

Roll him in copper wiring = free energy

Looks like someone wants to save money for his wall!

@simeondunev4890

7 жыл бұрын

wall would cost like 13 bil maximum .. this project has cost trilions so far. His wall is a drop in the bucket compared to this and many more dissaster projects biased media wont tell you about

@KiingOfKombat

7 жыл бұрын

it hasnt cost trillion or trillions as you say, its exected to cost a trillion over its entire life time up until 2070.

@linusmlgtips2123

7 жыл бұрын

Diogo Almeida We have spent 1.5 trillion on the F35 over its entire lifetime

@ZanOGAL

7 жыл бұрын

i personally think trumps' grandfather made the great wall of china...u know the similiarities are uncanny

@afocus

7 жыл бұрын

this man was obviously joking. Now hes getting flamed

American people: Can we please have free ambulance rides. Government: no here's an inefficient fighter jet

@acowfrommars3565

3 жыл бұрын

Now give me half your yearly income to fix your broken arm

@recruit8921

3 жыл бұрын

@@acowfrommars3565 having a heart attack here in the usa can cost you 100k.

@yesnoyeswait4306

3 жыл бұрын

Michael Moore had excellent point. If people would see in pay check how much of taxes are used in military budget, maybe people would actually wake up. In France people can actually see procents, ''Health care x%, education x%'' etc. You guys in US deserve same education and health care, that we do. Too bad that your country is only ran by money and overgroven power.

@sheastephens562

3 жыл бұрын

The jet is remarkable in design and amazing do some research.

@yesnoyeswait4306

3 жыл бұрын

@@sheastephens562 Yes, very remarkable. Whole project will cost 20-50 billion dollars, and if you pay taxes, you too are paying for that. And this is nothing new. B2 bomber project cost +40 billion, and only 23 were ever built. 2-3 billion per one stealth bomber, if you think thats money well spent, you are out of your mind.

Vox: The F-35 is far more advanced than anything Russia or China have. Also Vox: Will it fly?

@randomname5083

3 жыл бұрын

I'd disagree with that statement looking at the Su-57

@virajchoudhary6761

3 жыл бұрын

Heard that America wants newly designed 4.5 gen fighter jet,they also want a full stop to this f 35 program,Is this true?

@dwshade9479

3 жыл бұрын

@@virajchoudhary6761 Right now the F-15 is getting either a 4.5 or 5th gen dedicated replacement, the F-15EX. The F-16 is also rumored to have been getting its own dedicated replacement. Many people want the F35 canceled or massively scaled back as the benefits for it are undercut with it not fully replacing the craft it could (F-15 and 16), and how our allies will be the ones to see the greatest use and benefit from it rather than us, when America is the one footing the 1.5 trillion dollar bill. I'd argue that the F35 is perfectly capable, it's just not being used even close to the fullest due to the litany of failures it had during R&D, and it isn't replacing the aircraft it was supposed to.

@virajchoudhary6761

3 жыл бұрын

@@dwshade9479 Advantages & Disadvantages are two faces of a coin so it should not be an Issue for the 35.But If air Marshal is saying something than it should not be taken for granted.5th gen 6th gen it sounds cool but We should remember that cool things have high maintenance 😅. According to me No one can rule out the importance of a 4.5 gen jet Nd that's what Air Marshal said in his statement By the way being an Indian I was happy that America is thinking of opting a 4.5 gen jet because Our TEJAS jet has multiple variants in production so I am happy that we r in the LEAGUE😅

@jeevanjacob4102

3 жыл бұрын

Its a play on words, it's a saying meaning will it work/succeed. They're not literally asking if it will fly.

You forgot to talk about the brib.....ehm "lobbying" the defense contractors give

@tomatoisasquishyfruit

7 жыл бұрын

In US, Lobbying is just a fancy name for corruption. Usually in other countries, people go to jail for that.

@viktor-dy9tr

7 жыл бұрын

Also, no word about the death these machines bring to the world

@riemjann1

7 жыл бұрын

Lobbying is actually important for a democracy so that corporations and other associations have a say in politics as well. But not to the extent it has grown to in the US; they just have way too much say in US legislation.

@juicyclaws

7 жыл бұрын

if vox mentioned lobbying or the moral issues of producing weapons half the comments would be about how left wing biased they are.

@0ki7o

7 жыл бұрын

quite the opposite

The f35 is in no way a disaster it is extremely fast and mostly undetectable to enemy plans and ground radar. During a combat test the f35 took down 4 f16 without the enemy pilots knowing he was there till it was to late.

@ckahandcarwashltd2403

7 жыл бұрын

shittyG1 that was down to bad communication.

@Dantick09

7 жыл бұрын

shittyG1 daesh doesn't even have planes, the only thing the air force is doing is bombing runs and drones do that just fine

@tvertrees2080

7 жыл бұрын

An economic disaster is still a disaster. This is why we only have 20 B2 stealth bombers. Worked good but cost way too much.

@neeneko

7 жыл бұрын

In controlled tests and games it does well, but as a weapons system and a project it is a disaster. It has great marque value, but pretty low tactical or logistic value.

@SuccubusLover69

7 жыл бұрын

The product itself is probably not a disaster, but the project definitely is. Crazy delays and more than 70%! over budget is awful.

The United Corporations of America.

@abeninan4017

3 жыл бұрын

AKA swamp,now they have full control of the government.

@user-jq4ej7pf9o

3 жыл бұрын

Literally every country in the world

@yeetjones927

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-jq4ej7pf9o what about 3rd world countries?

@zidorovichburblyatya2862

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-jq4ej7pf9o Uhmmm Russia and China don't have 35 trillion dollars blackhole in accounting regarding total military spending tho.

@user-jq4ej7pf9o

3 жыл бұрын

@@zidorovichburblyatya2862 So what? They have problems even worse

1,000 F-35s in production as of January 2024. *THIS VIDEO AGED LIKE MILK!* 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@somethingsomething-us3uy

4 ай бұрын

It was worth it

Can u imagine if we put 7 trillion over 16 years into space exploration? There would be bases on Mars now!

@yfelwulf

4 жыл бұрын

Wrong there would be an atmosphere and swimming pools

@miner966

4 жыл бұрын

yfelwulf Bruh there’s be a whole civilization and new world.

@pilot88pro

4 жыл бұрын

you all are wrong. There wouldn't be an America as surely someone would take us over with 0 military....

@seankilburn7200

4 жыл бұрын

Sort life out here before we flee the planet.

@pathfinderLXXIV

4 жыл бұрын

and only rich people would be allowed to go there... even though we paid for it all.

So much for Eisenhower warning against the military industrial complex.

@cameronsipka3352

7 жыл бұрын

apsodifugyht3 he shouldn't have done so much to put us on that track XD

@dylanadams6533

7 жыл бұрын

He warned against it-after he oversaw its growth.

@TrackHeadStudios

7 жыл бұрын

+Endo Pyro he didn't 'oversee' its growth. It grew under his nose and got to Big before he realized it was there. It is a living breathing entity.

@krombopulos_michael

7 жыл бұрын

apsodifugyht3 well if we all listened then he wouldn't have been right!

@phuturephunk

7 жыл бұрын

Aye. There was another general that predicted a long time ago that eventually we'd get to the point where we'd be spending like a trillion dollars on one vehicle. Guess that prediction came true. I wish I could find the quote but it was really good. It laid out how it gets to this point with how the defense manufacturing industry is structured.

Well this aged like milk…

@seankilburn7200

2 жыл бұрын

Indeed

the F35 is the stealthiest aircraft in the world ... because it is well hidden in the back of the maintenance workshop

@wheywhou5031

3 жыл бұрын

Wasn’t there even some incident where German radars detected the F-35 (was during a flight show tho)

@danielhope8577

3 жыл бұрын

@@wheywhou5031 all aircraft get detected at some point. Stealth just limits how close it can get before its detected. F35 and F22 gets detected at about 30 to 20 miles. Other fighters get detected wayyy earlier than that

@hx20games77

2 жыл бұрын

F22 is better but F35 has vtol and navy

@kabali0079

2 жыл бұрын

F 117? What about that?

@shiraz1736

2 жыл бұрын

What a Lemon

Basically, politics makes everything cancerous, even engineering

@grasonicus

4 жыл бұрын

That's because politicians are mostly from the arts and humanities and have to take off their shoes and socks to work with numbers greater than ten. At heart, they're confidence tricksters. All they have to be able to do is work the voting cattle come election time.

@alexbeerune

4 жыл бұрын

Chris Malan well tell me a world without politicians

@grasonicus

4 жыл бұрын

@@alexbeerune We can but dream. In the Bible, on the New Earth, there won't be any politicians. Guess where they will be?

@jay-t1030

4 жыл бұрын

Dame Surina money in politics*

@pasqualeredo

4 жыл бұрын

True... That's why engineers don't get involved with, or in the politics that infest engineering projects in companies whether the company or project in question is defense related or not. THAT'S the role of the "Project Manager", and supposedly spawned the birth of the Dilbert principle whereby incompetence is promoted... UP and out of the way allowing the real talent to effectively do it's job!🛸

The military industrial complex needs to become the space industrial complex!

@vg666

7 жыл бұрын

Looplix why? can't we focus in earth right now.

@Cythil

7 жыл бұрын

You be surprised how much of the Space industry is actually focused on earth. Happens that Earth is situated in space. ;)

@n0yn0y

7 жыл бұрын

That would be great. It would be more productive to amass an advanced space fleet that is dedicated to exploration, rather than to amass a fleet of fighter jets for a war that will never happen.

@HxH2011DRA

7 жыл бұрын

Looplix This

@TheMongooseOfDoom

7 жыл бұрын

Having worked in the space industrial complex, I can say that no, it has the same issues. The space industrial complex needs to either become an open market, or a government project. Right now it's a vehicle for companies to extort as much money out of the government as possible by doing as little exploration as possible.

Who is here after Economics Explained's video? ✋

@DeepSingh-yg7ic

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah me too .

@broken_abi6973

3 жыл бұрын

@@Brent-ln9bc The claim by vox is not that the f-35 project is the only military project with cost overruns and delays.

@thedirty530

3 жыл бұрын

And the money involved in our politics keeps making more and more sense...

@fmtoussant

3 жыл бұрын

economics explained is a simp stop wasting ur time there

@somethingelse9228

3 жыл бұрын

@@fmtoussant Do you know of any other economics channel then?

this aged terribly

@-p2349

Жыл бұрын

*horrifically

The F 35 Boondoggle, a fighter plane so deadly it's able to destroy entire national defense budgets single-handedly!

@SgtJoeSmith

6 жыл бұрын

Veldtian1 good one!

@DehnusNorder

6 жыл бұрын

LOL! Next thing you know Trump will threaten to sell one to North Korea ;).

@pasoundman

6 жыл бұрын

LMAO. It'll be fixed some day. It won't be a great plane though.

@joniartha9777

6 жыл бұрын

DehnusNorder yeah and make good fortune lol

@DehnusNorder

6 жыл бұрын

Nobody makes a fortune of that piece of junk.

It may be an awful plane I don’t know. But I once saw a 60 minutes story decades ago telling us how awful the Abrams tank was. I’ve also see a life magazine article from the late thirties telling how the M1 Garand was a disaster and would get our soldiers killed. Some things you just can’t trust.

@donut5818

4 жыл бұрын

The main reason why I am upset about the F-35 is that they are trying to make a single base airframe do too much. The USAF actually tried to unify all of the military's needs into a single airframe before with the F-111 program but it failed.

@Swat_Dennis

4 жыл бұрын

warman58 The M1 Garand is an awful rifle… Look at the SVT-40 and you know enough

@benjamincharlin6770

4 жыл бұрын

Look at the movie pentagon war, It's a movie That talk about the designing processus of the Bradley, it also refers the flaw of the early M16 an M35

@lamduong5701

3 жыл бұрын

I want to know which documentary you saw about the Abrams. It's one of the most combat-proven armor vehicles out there.

@warman58

3 жыл бұрын

@@lamduong5701 as I said, it was a sixty minutes episode. Very old as the tank was new at the time.

“Its a disaster” And nobody mentioned how tomcat nearly destroyed the defense budget singlehanded. Just look at its price lol

@viperz3r016

3 ай бұрын

The F35 is a bargain to the F14, if the Tomcat was to be built again.

This video has quite a negative view on the f-35, while it is more expensive than predicted, and there are cost overruns. The jet is one of the best ever built and does the job it was designed to do quite well. Especially considering that it was designed to replace many different types of fighters, which was once thought to be impossible. And the stealth aspect should not be underestimated because without stealth the fighters like the f16 are pretty much useless against an enemy like Russia or china who have advanced air defense systems.

@youtubevideoswatching3866

Жыл бұрын

Well I mean we should focus on NGAD since it’s already in production

@tylergarrett4498

Жыл бұрын

@@youtubevideoswatching3866 the NGAD has a different purpose than the F-35. The NGAD is a proposed interceptor which will only do *light* intercept missions and maybe even lighter strike missions. The NGAD is also going to be see massive benefits from all of the lessons learned in the F-35 (which has an amazing exercise record already). It's also important to consider that the F-35 is going to be in service for atleast 50 years, all costs included in the first purchase. (Hangars, training, parts, upgrade budgets).

@terrestrialextra4790

Жыл бұрын

We are focusing on both. Why don't people understand this? Cancelling The F-35 wouldn't help the NGAD at all. We would just have a SERIOUS gap in between F-16 retirements and whatever program comes next which would likely cost just as much and takes a decade to develop before production even starts. The cost of the F-35 has been overblown. People quote the entire lifetime cost of 40+ years and don't realize that whatever comes next will be the same. The only pricey aspect besides the development overruns which are done and done(cancelling makes this a waste of money) is the maintenance cost. 80 million a for a 5th generation is cheaper than most 4+ generation jets. Quoted coat for the F-15 for instance ignores all the extra parts it needs for modern combat like eternal sensors etc which makes it more.

@staidenofanarchy

Жыл бұрын

No plane is worth $1.3 trillion. We're using jets that cost hundreds of millions, and missiles than cost tens of millions, to blow up families and weddings in deserts halfway across the world. Cut the defense budget.

@youtubevideoswatching3866

Жыл бұрын

@@tylergarrett4498 yeah, but the NGAD is almost ready, so the majority should go for that. Besides, other nations are buying the f35, and we already have a significant albeit small number of them

Canceling the project doesn't have to lose all these jobs, the F-35 in particular is the problem so ending the F-35 project while simultaneously starting a new, better thought out one, would keep the jobs and end the nightmare that is the F-35

@stimproid

7 жыл бұрын

And what kind of plane would you suggest we build instead?

@trev6511

7 жыл бұрын

stimproid Different planes for each branch of the military that are actually built purposefully to be best for their respective branch. You could then more easily distribute the work across multiple contractors to keep/create jobs at multiple companies.

@mewtwo2111

7 жыл бұрын

Trev6511 what about the countries expecting there plane orders.

@EvelynDayless

7 жыл бұрын

It takes time to design new planes. What about all the production jobs already fielded and the states that want to keep those jobs going.

@EvelynDayless

7 жыл бұрын

Trev6511 Production lines are insanely expensive. Other countries canceling their orders would likely affect the US too, but since the US is the biggest buyer they have the greatest effect on it. I actually agree with you to some extent though; I was just pointing out some of the problems with it.

Heh, this jet is extremely capable and I could go into detail why. The F-35 isn't a bad jet at all, but the main issue here lies in procurement. The key now lies in cutting the JSF's cost whilst still maintaining the quality of the aircraft. The Pentagon has plenty of wasteful, redundant practices which've yet to be abolished. The JSF procurement program is one from which lessons must be learnt so that contractors will no longer be able to hold the DOD budget hostage and that future contractors work out fixed price agreements with the DOD and bear the burden of cost overruns completely or mostly on their own. The Pentagon's issues include but aren't limited to: #1: The Regulatory Burden #2: Barriers to Full and Fair Competition #3: Antiquated Sustainment Processes and Procedures #4: Inefficient Supply Chain Management #5: Poor Cost Data and Incomplete Cost Analyses #6: Limited Long-term Acquisition and Funding Strategies On November 8 2013, the Lexington Institute sponsored a non-partisan forum on Capitol Hill to address ways of reducing the Pentagon’s overhead costs. There was general agreement by nearly a dozen speakers that cutting reporting requirements, audits, contracting paperwork, data calls, and some testing requirements could save tens of billions of dollars annually. Though IMO, audits are necessary to ensure transparency and accountability, taxpayers have a right to know where their defense dollars are going. Shocking how this video doesn't cover these vital facts. Why the F-35 is important: _The technologies in the F-22, and the F-35, provide situational awareness of a conflict that is unparalleled in modern war, and lethal tools that enable both aircraft and capabilities in other domains to perform at a higher level. Fifth generation assets employed by joint forces give the US “the asymmetric advantage we need to win our nation’s wars,” Carlisle added._ _Despite their capability, at present fifth generation aircraft comprise a fraction of the current combat air forces. The average age of a current USAF airframe is 27 years, and rising. Modernizing fighter and bomber forces with sufficient numbers of fifth generation aircraft is critical for continued combat relevance, especially in light of three important trends:_ • _Modern Integrated Air Defense Systems (IADS) have created regions where fourth generation aircraft cannot effectively penetrate and hope to survive._ • _Threat aircraft, air-to-air missiles (AAMs), electronic attack (EA), and electronic protection systems have advanced beyond the capabilities of US fourth generation fighters._ _•Fifth generation aircraft provide a wider variety of wartime options in many scenarios, preserve US technological advantage over near-peer threats, and serve as force multipliers by increasing the situational awareness and combat effectiveness of legacy aircraft._ -_Fifth Generation Air Combat: Maintaining the Joint Force Advantage By Maj Gen Jeff Harrigian and Col Max Marosko, USAF_ TLDR: The jet has excellent combat capability. The F-35 is a capable aircraft but the procurement is disastrous and wasteful. _Vox_ has demonstrated 0 knowledge of kinematic and non-kinematic military requirements and responses and the Pentagon procurement process. And to end it off with a Trump like one worded sarcasm: *Sad!*

@zulukobra233

7 жыл бұрын

Informative comment, I still have a question regarding the F-35 though. A friend of mine in the U.S. was saying about how they might replace the A-10 with the Lightning, but it seems like an unwise decision to do. I'm curious about whether they will replace the aircraft that does its role so well. *Sigh* It had pretty nice run, though, the Warthog. I'm sure it won't be forgotten by those who flew it.

@54356776

7 жыл бұрын

The Fake SecDef Interesting read. My navy needs this plane ( Royal Navy) , otherwise we have no fixed wing aircraft as our new carriers are built around it (bad move). Should've just kept the Harriers.

@halseyactual1732

7 жыл бұрын

+Zulu Kobra By all accounts the F-35 is very CAS capable. Superior situational awareness, greater range, longer loiter times, more armament, can feed precise coordinates to MLRSs and Excalibur 155mm SPGs. The A-10 has a good targeting pod but that has a verry narrow FOV, making wide array terrain and enemy identification impossible. There's no real argument as to why the A-10 is superior to the F-35 at CAS. You can just ask me if you need specifics. +Andrew Fishburn Yes, the Royal Navy does need this plane. But keeping your Harriers would be unwise. Simply too antiquated, unsuitable for the 21st century threat environment. All I can say is that your navy needs F-35s on time, they only have a handful at the moment, they need the full force and the full force *NOW*. Lockheed Martin is obliged to deliver, I hope the JSF sees no more delays, but ugh, that sounds unlikely.

@titsonafish1008

7 жыл бұрын

One of the things I found troubling about the video is that it didn't mention that the F-35's flyaway cost when it reaches FRIP will be roughly $83 million for the CTOL model, which isn't that much more than a Super Hornet. The LRIP costs are already cheaper than the EF2000 with far superior capabilities.

@jimbo2335

7 жыл бұрын

How funny and suspicious, this is it, the plane that all of departments in our government say is a fiasco, Israel want them all, there is something fishy about this, Israel, who have one of the best weaponry, the blind, deaf and dumb American tax payers can gift them for free and nothing,, want all this bad quality planes, something is going on, maybe, the Zionist who control all the branches of our government, order them to say just that the plane sucks, so they will get them almost for free or not cost, because they are unfit to do their job. The evil Zionism at one more of its best deceptions to the American blind sheep. Peace.

It’s funny, I’m watching this in 2022 and the F35 is the future. It’s performing well and kills anything in the sky.

@ragglefraggle9111

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, every major fighter jet has a ton of issues at launch. The F-16 was initially seen as a disaster and now it's regarded as one of the best jets ever made (for the time).

@hoot1141

2 жыл бұрын

@@ragglefraggle9111 That is so true. Fighters are at the top of the list for critics in the government and the media every time we T&E a new one.

@adrianshephard224

Жыл бұрын

Kills anything in the sky? Go ask Syrians, I heard they damaged one by an very old Soviet built S200 system. Israelis are denying this saying that the F35 in question was not damaged by the S200 missile but by the flock of seagulls that went after F35 on purpose to destroy it to the point where it needed to be scrapped. Supposedly one seagull took a giant dump in F35 engine compartment and the blades of turbo-jet just got stuck. I don't believe Syrians but I do believe Israelis. F35 needs to erase all the seagulls of this planet. PERIOD.

@rayquaza1245

Жыл бұрын

Almost like the people designing it are some of the smartest in the world, while vox wouldn't even be able to recognize an f35 if you showed them a picture

@Trex2009x

Жыл бұрын

@@ragglefraggle9111 That's the thing about military vehicles, at the beggining they are regarded as failures like the Abrams and F-35 and now the Abrams MBT is one of the strongest tanks ever meanwhile F-35 IS the future of Air combat

This aged well, pfffffftt.

The jet is actually proving to be a step above anything out there. It’s probably the most unstoppable plane ever made.

@JacobBite

4 жыл бұрын

can you imagine if the british aerospace industry wasn't destroyed after the cold war?

@krankysfirebrand485

3 жыл бұрын

Of course it is. Newer and more expensive aircraft means better. It could be done with literally any other concept aircraft

@judejohnson6336

3 жыл бұрын

The Su-57 doesn't exist I guess

@agzuhdhdandicycidjs3230

3 жыл бұрын

The US has enough weapons to destroy humanity 10 times over. Do they really need a fancy plane?

@user-wc3wu2mx3m

3 жыл бұрын

@@agzuhdhdandicycidjs3230 in what way would they destroy humanity 10 times over? Are you referrinh to nukes, or overall military might besides nukes?

Hard to believe it was almost 60 years ago that Ike warned us the about the military industrial complex.

@fullboostturbo1

5 жыл бұрын

@@StruggleGun Oh how the Truth becomes annoying, when nothing is done to remedy the cause of the problem.

@bobgreene2892

5 жыл бұрын

wrotenwasp said, "Hard to believe it was almost 60 years ago that Ike warned us the about the military industrial complex." --------------------- And the arms industry patronage and corruption in congress was almost out of control, even then.

@ArturoSubutex

5 жыл бұрын

I might be wrong but I think FDR did that first in the 30s

@NSGrendel

5 жыл бұрын

@@ArturoSubutex kzread.info/dash/bejne/ga12sM-ek7nalLg.html

@darthvader5300

5 жыл бұрын

$1 trillion? The actual cost is between $6 to $7 trillion! Talk about subtle censorship down playing everything! That $6 to $7 trillion 90% could have been used to revamp the VA and put a heavy emphasis on ACCOUNTABILITY ON EVERYONE WORKING IN THE VA DEPARTMENT and giving veterans and current soldiers complete freedom and flexibility to choose their own physicians and caretakers and quality of medical care, instead of neglecting them and DELIBERATELY DELAYING THEIR CARE SO THAT THEY CAN DIE FROM A LACK OF MEDICAL CARE AND COVER IT UP AS A NATURAL DEATH WHEN IN FACT THEY, THE VA PERSONEL ARE THE MASS KILLERS AND MASS MURDERERS OF OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN UNIFORMS JUST SO THAT THEY CAN MONEY AND LET CONGRESS POCKET THE DIFFERENCE FOR THEIR RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGNS FUNDING PROGRAMS, etc! And the remaining 10% used to develop and upgrade any time-tested and time-proven and battle-tested LEAN AND MEAN DEFENSIVE AND OFFENSIVE weapons systems.

And we can't even buy and produce ventilators...

@peterson7082

4 жыл бұрын

We can produce them, just currently not at the scale needed. And there is an abundance of ventilators, just few qualified to meet the needs of hospitals.

@jasonperdue2554

4 жыл бұрын

We already produced all we need, more even. Like anything paid for, they take time to build, assemble, ship and use

@thrall9498

4 жыл бұрын

TheFlying Templar im glad there are educated people on the subject. Sad that some people jump straight to conclusions and assume it’s someone’s fault. Please do your research people!!

@kiraasuka9943

3 жыл бұрын

@@thrall9498 educated folks are gone. Look at our future leader like NYC progressive dem AOC: shooting and violence in our community is up in the past 2 weeks I think is poor people need some bread to feed their kids.

@knightrider693

3 жыл бұрын

This comment didn't age well

There is where our universal health care and low cost tuition went.

@johncampbell3356

4 жыл бұрын

@@user-zd9fc4vs4q don't want to be in debt to the government the rest of my life

@demanischaffer

4 жыл бұрын

If you want free healthcare, why don't you ask your state legislature to do so?

@johncampbell3356

4 жыл бұрын

@@demanischaffer they are too busy giving isreal 3.8 billion dollars a year so they can have Medicare for all. Our government works for AIPAC, not us

@demanischaffer

4 жыл бұрын

@@johncampbell3356 Your state legislature is giving money to Israel? Sounds highly unlikely

@johncampbell3356

4 жыл бұрын

@@demanischaffer no, that would be the federal government.

Lockheed Martin offered the X35 Boeing offered a bathtub

@daiminnathan5989

5 жыл бұрын

Reginald Uy neither were pretty but the Boeing was a real stinker

@theswagman1263

4 жыл бұрын

@@daiminnathan5989 it looked like it was gonna eat someone lol

@chimergo6501

4 жыл бұрын

Hey but atleast Boeing build plane who can laugh ...

@willvanrooy6878

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah... Boeing's had a distinct double chin - major jowls 😂

@TheSpeep

4 жыл бұрын

Neither of them looks anywhere near as nice as the Su-57 the Russians are working on, but yes, unlike Boeing's plane this one still looks pretty slick.

These are the types of highly explanatory videos that I love most about Vox and keeps me subbed. Thank you and please create more

@jacoblemieux3791

7 жыл бұрын

doodelay Yup this is what I like. Not their stupid liberal propaganda.

@doodelay

7 жыл бұрын

One Minute History​​ I do like the idea quite a lot. But after watching a few of your videos I think that 1 minute history is in fact, too short. Perhaps 5 minute history would best serve your viewers? After all people who like history do not have tiny attention spans, even minute physics no longer makes 1 minute videos. I did sub though, keep it up and please do not limit yourself to 1 literal minute

@young7931

7 жыл бұрын

I hate vox due to them spewing liberal crap and femenist bs

@webhobo7786

7 жыл бұрын

doodelay I agree!

@Flightman453

7 жыл бұрын

Stop crying. If it's Trump is "propaganda". If it's Hillary it's "biased". Pick one idiot.

Like most Vox videos, this aged like milk.

@fishbarbeque8540

Жыл бұрын

Hahahahah!!!

@Racko.

Жыл бұрын

What did you expect? It'a Vox, they hardly know what they're talking about, as long as it's negative attempts to make stuff look bad

@jesuszamora6949

Жыл бұрын

This is why Vice is cratering. They started out awesome, then turned into Buzzfeed.

It is the best fighter jet ever made. It's only "bad" because of costs and delays, many countries are ordering it because it is so good.

Not mentioned is that most of the companies discussed in this video pay zero federal taxes and generous state tax breaks...............

@yetifacekilah8885

5 жыл бұрын

How dare they create so many jobs.............

@flowerdoyle3749

5 жыл бұрын

@@yetifacekilah8885....you do realize who pays the taxes to keep the infrastructure viable so the business can flourish...right? You do realize they are also a government provider so those taxes basically pay for many of those jobs. You do realize how likely they are to get even more government contracts and goodies now that Pat Shanahan...ex Boeing CEO is the Secretary of Defense. Numerous small businesses that Boeing has outsourced much of their work to are creating jobs and paying taxes. Why are companies making billions in profit exempt from taxes while a companies making a million are not?

@Transfixed

5 жыл бұрын

@@yetifacekilah8885 The government likes to brag about creating jobs, but how many businesses would want to bloat their largest expense (personnel)? Don't be fooled.

@bruhmoment7546

5 жыл бұрын

> "Don't be fooled" Jesus christ i fell like this is some anti vax mom. And no, often personeel isn't the highest expense, and even if it is it's just 90% billion dollar CEO bonuses.

@Transfixed

5 жыл бұрын

@@bruhmoment7546 Ok business expert. Ask any economist then.

Harrier Jump Jet: (exists) F-35: "Give me a few decades and I'll one up you."

@donut5818

4 жыл бұрын

While the F-35B is an improvement, better fighters could’ve been built if the work was split between 3 separate designs and not just one.

@patthonsirilim5739

4 жыл бұрын

@@donut5818 true a truck will never be able to handle like a sports car and vice versa a specific design for specific role will always outperform an equipment that is design to do multiple task

@demanischaffer

4 жыл бұрын

@@donut5818 however each of the variants were built from the ground up to meet the requirements of each service, the A,B, and C are internally very different

@TheRogueX

4 жыл бұрын

@@demanischaffer It would have been cheaper to design three different planes.

@demanischaffer

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheRogueX So it would've been cheaper to design 3 totally separate 5th generation planes then to design 3 very similar 5th geniration planes that have some of the same parts and a lot of cousin parts? So where are you getting your assessment from?

Next video from Vox: Why cancelling the F-35, which we labeled as a disaster, will be a disaster.

@petitio_principii

2 жыл бұрын

Or maybe a video on how long it will take for its development costs to be finally covered.

@kordellswoffer1520

2 жыл бұрын

@@petitio_principii not very long.

This video didn’t age well. Seeing as the F35 is now very successful

@petitio_principii

2 жыл бұрын

Video point is not "f35 is bad" but "f35 development is slow and extraordinarily expensive." It remains the case.

@logicplague2077

Жыл бұрын

@@petitio_principii Same can be said about basically every new military aircraft design. Could it have been done better? Very likely yes. Was it ever going to be "cheap" to develop? Absolutely not.

@pelicanair2048

Жыл бұрын

It wasn’t good from the start

@ae3464

Жыл бұрын

The problem with the plane is that its very expensive and congress still continues to supoort it. Although i agree this is a good plane and a successful one

@sigma_frenchie4075

Жыл бұрын

@@logicplague2077 No lol, The F-35 is literally the most plagued and most expensive military program in HISTORY. what is done is done and just saying "But hey at least F35 flies and is stealthy and oh it can drop bombs aswell" will not change that. you are trying to save the pots and pans

The F-35 is selling so good the price is down to 78 million USD for the popular F-35A variant. By all measures, this program is becoming wildly successful.

@noedels2119

3 жыл бұрын

@FEDSJ ye but fighters like the f16 had over a 1000 flaws in the beginning but now it is the most successful jet fighter in the world

@gilberttrois8492

3 жыл бұрын

They just wanted to surpass the French goat Rafale at 77million

@docinabox258

3 жыл бұрын

@FEDSJ its is still the best jet though

@macvos

3 жыл бұрын

@@noedels2119 how dare you be so factual and realistic! Big projects becoming successful after working out the initial kinks aren't useful to make fun of, especially by uninformed people with zero understanding of big complex development projects.

@michaelalvarez8112

4 ай бұрын

Idk if your bashing it or not. But the price dropping for fighter planes is actually a good thing. It means it’s getting streamlined and easier to produce

This video didn’t age well. Extremely costly? Yes. But oh boy what a superior technological masterpiece the F-35 is. Above anything else that currently exists.

@TheEmreErgul

2 жыл бұрын

I think StarshipSN15 is above F-35. F-35 is not a good investment for anything. High cost to maintain (hardware gets old). High cost to use ($36k per hour). In war, it's not affordable to lose ($100m). While you can do the same job with a $5m drone without risking your pilot.

@SomeonessChannel

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheEmreErgul Starship SN15? Do you have any idea what you're talking about?

@TheEmreErgul

2 жыл бұрын

@@SomeonessChannel Sorry I should have been more clear. What I was trying to say f-35 is not superior to many things technological-wise. It's not above anything else. It's above other aircraft. Not in all aspects ofc but in most of them.

@SomeonessChannel

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheEmreErgul That's the point of the F-35. Being superior to any other aircraft, not to be the most superior piece of technology humanity has ever built.

@logicplague2077

Жыл бұрын

Most Vox videos don't.

Trump about the F-35: “It is invisible, you cannot see it” Lockheed: “To radar...invisible to radar!”

@kroelld

3 жыл бұрын

@Nick Milligan 😉 We have more than that.

@logicplague2077

Жыл бұрын

Both are wrong.

@FGCVidz

Жыл бұрын

What if that was a classified capability that he wasn’t supposed to leak? Lol

@logicplague2077

Жыл бұрын

@@FGCVidz Then the laws of physics decided to take some time off.

@aussiejezza

Жыл бұрын

and here I was hoping for a surprise invisibility cloak

The price of this aircraft has decreased a lot; this video aged like milk

Ironically this jet is proving itself virtually unstoppable by the Israelis.

@op3129

4 жыл бұрын

that WOULD be ironic ... if true

@dovidell

4 жыл бұрын

The Israeli Air Force is a great poster boy for advertising American made planes " tested" in the Middle East and other arenas

@pepefrogstein845

4 жыл бұрын

Unstoppable except if you're a bird or a S-200 missile, depending on who you ask.

@Aldnon

4 жыл бұрын

@@op3129 They did, they test it by flying it to Iran airspace right over their capital, completely undetected.

@demanischaffer

4 жыл бұрын

@@pepefrogstein845 Good thing neither the Russians, Syrians nor Israelis have ever verified that unfounded claim of an S-200 even firing at an F-35 Also bird strikes are not good for any type of plane

so the point, war pays

@ryanhaasbroek2643

7 жыл бұрын

Kaan Ra Very much so. It costs too.

@Isomoar

7 жыл бұрын

Ironically people don't seem to have a problem with that cost however... Everything else costs too much though! /s

@DeepValueOptions

7 жыл бұрын

Kaan Ra war is a good business for the likes of Stark Industries

@onomatopoeia162003

7 жыл бұрын

and Eisenhower was right

@scofield1154

7 жыл бұрын

it doesnt pay off its just that if they cancel it completely it would be a big problem same thing with obamacare its not perfect but completely cancelling it would be disasterous If you ask me I think that America should keep spending money on aircrafts but not aircrafts that kill people

Engineers: F35 has many design flaws... Government: Yes Engineers: So what are we supposed to do? Government: Yes... ...

@aussiejezza

Жыл бұрын

Government: Send em anyway!

I love your work Vox, but on this occasion it really didn't age very well at all

@user-bz9xd4ss7p

Жыл бұрын

What happened?

@andrerobertson3151

Жыл бұрын

@@user-bz9xd4ss7p The f-35 is a great plane

@user-bz9xd4ss7p

Жыл бұрын

@@andrerobertson3151 okay, but it’s still going to be used to bomb civilians.

@just_some_bigfoot_hacking_you

Жыл бұрын

@@user-bz9xd4ss7p What happened? Do some research about F-35B and see it yourself.

@Vageta1999

Жыл бұрын

@@user-bz9xd4ss7p what’s that have to do with the video?

I'm starting to think that Congress really doesn't like paying debts...

@worldmapping4895

3 жыл бұрын

well noone does

@abeninan4017

3 жыл бұрын

They don't care.

@anincompetentmoron8497

3 жыл бұрын

Can we go back to 1835 please? When the debt was 0?!

@smitias_8474

3 жыл бұрын

@@anincompetentmoron8497 Debt isn't inherently bad, but you should be cautious with that.

Spreading production across the country like that, might be politically smart, but is terribly inefficient.

@MegaMoose1989

6 жыл бұрын

it is how they guarantee a source of income. There is a defense contractor in almost every single congressional district in the country. Even St Bernie of Vermont is a big F35 defender because of the jobs it brings to Vermont.

@tollboothjason

6 жыл бұрын

Saint Bernie of Vermont 🤣🤣🤣

@wombatlover2796

6 жыл бұрын

Especially, when you go to final assembly and the huge quality control issues occur and parts don't fit properly, then you have to machine them to fit.. so each aircraft has specialised parts.. Then ALIS tells you that parts aren't working, when the parts are actually working.. so you got to ground the aircraft until you can find the fault with ALIS... Its about this time, you need to purchase a $600 hammer from the Pentagon..

@kyle857

6 жыл бұрын

SylphionGamer We dont really need efficiency for the numbers we are building.

@sumott497

5 жыл бұрын

@wombat - you really need to study how this jet is being developed. It took 20 years to develop the f14 tomcat. We are at year 12 of development of the F35, so your perspective is off. Secondly, only 200 f-35s have been built and for good reason. Its a testing fleet. When something breaks they reengineer the part so when we buld 2300 of these jets, parts match up. People dont realize that development has not ended.

How is Vox even in business at this point. You are wrong on everything 🤣

@arthurmorgan332

Жыл бұрын

The same way Fox is still in business 😎

@moobutt

Жыл бұрын

@@arthurmorgan332 - They’re nothing but controlled opposition trash. Layoff the Kool Aid.

@thecornman3344

Жыл бұрын

@@arthurmorgan332 vox is like the fox of the left

@jeltje50

Жыл бұрын

@@thecornman3344 nahhh vox atleast has some good articles/videos.

Well this turned out to be totally wrong!!!

@petitio_principii

2 жыл бұрын

No.

@diceman3219

2 жыл бұрын

@@petitio_principii yes

"the helmet is to heavy" what an Air Force Answer...

@wormfood868

5 жыл бұрын

Remember the pilot has to deal with G-forces from maneuvering, so a twenty pound helmet is a lot bigger problem for them. Strap 100 pounds to your head and look up, then let us know how it went. Edit: The helmet isn't really nearly that heavy, but weight's still an issue, especially if the pilot has to eject.

@ewthmatth

5 жыл бұрын

Kevin Hill in a 7G turn that helmet weighs 140 pounds.

@imrekalman9044

5 жыл бұрын

The helmet for the Eurofighter Typhoon is 1.9 kg, just over 4 lbs. The F-35's should be similar. At 7+ G when it's not for a moment but constant for minutes, be it an air show or a dog fight, every gram matters.

@hempfarm8893

5 жыл бұрын

Chair force

@Bluelightning23

5 жыл бұрын

Kevin Hill There was more to it than just "the helmet is heavy" we were only given a short sound bite.

The F-35 has quickly become a very serviceable and respectable plane by the way; for anyone wondering in 2022 who doesn't know much about dogfighting

@petitio_principii

2 жыл бұрын

Not really "quickly," but finally. What are the estimates regarding when it would pay for its development costs, interest included?

@OperatorE0003

2 жыл бұрын

@@petitio_principii I think the cost of the development, no matter how high or low, would be irrelevant to the actual capabilities of the plane. To answer your question though, in a very long time

@ABC-48483

Жыл бұрын

Me and my ex would meet up if we were drunk.. we use to call our drunk s*x dogfighting

It’s the best fighter jet in the world

@mone2609

2 жыл бұрын

No

@99Yeti

2 жыл бұрын

@@mone2609 ok why I’ll prove ya wrong

@99Yeti

2 жыл бұрын

@@mone2609 hellooooo

@99Yeti

2 жыл бұрын

@@mone2609 I’ve been waiting

@captainmcsplash682

2 жыл бұрын

not the best, that would be the F-22, but certainly one of the best aircraft ever built.

This video has not aged well.

@NutcasePodcast77

10 ай бұрын

How?

@angellara7040

10 ай бұрын

​@@NutcasePodcast77how not?

@sya_7489

5 ай бұрын

@@NutcasePodcast77 look up how many countries are lining up to buy the F-35

@kaizer7568

25 күн бұрын

​@@sya_7489Just because other countries are lining up to buy it, it doesn't mean it's good. I think you forgot how corrupted politicians are

People like to bash the F-35 but they fail to take into account that this plane is made to replace everything and do everything

@fluxcapacitor1621

2 жыл бұрын

Everything but win a war. We keep losing wars and the F-35 wouldn't have changed the outcomes. If we had it during Vietnam, Iraq or Afghanistan, we still would have lost. It's all about using fear to freeload off of taxpayers. Socialism for Republicans. DoD = Department of Dependents I hate to break it to you but low cost drones are the future. You could have thousands of them in the sky for the same cost as an F-35.

@eleventy-seven

Жыл бұрын

It's a dream.

@ianshaver8954

Жыл бұрын

Dreams can become reality if you spend enough on them. The F-35 is proof.

@aussiejezza

Жыл бұрын

and that's why the f22, a10, f16, f15 and f18 are all no more

Remember what all the experts said about the F16 back in the late 1970 tees? "They have the wrong plane"

@articwolf10

5 жыл бұрын

@@More_Row i googled this for you. Google can help you find what your looking for. Remember to click on the link in order to read it. www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a21587/1977-when-the-f-16-was-americas-problem-child/

@alkaholic4848

5 жыл бұрын

Nineteen seventy tees? You only need an s on the end of the number, not a space then 'tees'. Interesting comment though, very relevant.

@Ugly_German_Truths

5 жыл бұрын

+Pierce Ryan You are aware that your link confirms that everything in the F35 program is like the F16 problems but *_on steroids_* ? It's a similar process but on a MUCH larger scale. And other than after four decades of successful F16 service it is far from secure that the F35 problems even CAN be completely eliminated. And finally the F16 only was supposed to fill one niche, the F35 is supposed to replace half a dozen different models of fighter craft in the Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy arsenals, there are no fallbacks to take up the slack should they not be able to deliver once they're on the roster that's it. It may turn out in 10 years that it was (mostly) resolvable, it may lead to an even more expensive emergency replacement program throwing good money after bad expenses. Only time can tell. It's much too soon to defend the program as undeservedly maligned just because on paper it looks kind of like a repeat of the F16... even more so as these problems, specifically the cost overruns have become a trend with growing consequences for the programs involved. And other than the Army with its dozens of tank or artillery projects that could be given up, the Air Force is always fighting ticking clocks as air frames only have a limited time of usage (while e.g. a tank chassis can be upgraded relatively easy, e.g. by bolting on suplementary armor or something like the Anti-RPG cages on the Strykers, bringing a jet fighter over its maximum number of flight hours requries almost a complete structural rebuild... costing about as much as a new plane anyways)

@331SVTCobra

5 жыл бұрын

I followed the F16 program from the yf-16 days. Nobody ever said it was "the wrong plane". Ever. The C5, F15, B1, and B17 were all hated on for being "the wrong plane"... and the complainers were proven profoundly wrong. But nobody ever disparaged the F16.

@ivanlagrossemoule

2 жыл бұрын

@@331SVTCobra Erm, the F-16 had massive crash rates and was referred to as the "lawn dart".

It's almost like there are complications with bleeding-edge technology. The list of things that have been incredible for the military, like the Abrams, Apache, Osprey, and so much more, that went thru similar teething issues is a long list.

@annoymouse890

Жыл бұрын

Apache isnt bleeding edge

@staz3014

9 ай бұрын

​@@annoymouse890Well of course, it was made in the 80s. It was bleeding edge for the 80s. Same for the Abrams back when it was first introduced... Ever heard of Desert Storm?

@annoymouse890

9 ай бұрын

i have@@staz3014

Switzerland just decided to buy 36 of those for the country...

@aztronomy7457

2 жыл бұрын

This is an old article from an anti military news organization. Talk to any pilot or military expert and most of the problems had been figured out with the f35. It's still way overpriced but it's certainly much better now than it was 4 or 5 years ago.

@MBuf

2 жыл бұрын

@@aztronomy7457 why does switzerland need 36 fighter jets...

@aztronomy7457

2 жыл бұрын

@@MBuf idk. I'm not swiss.

@MBuf

2 жыл бұрын

@@aztronomy7457 then why are you defending them & their choice?

@aztronomy7457

2 жыл бұрын

@@MBuf I'm simply stating that it's a good jet. Most of the problems have been worked out. If they want a jet, its a good one to buy. Do they NEED a jet? I have no idea.

It’s only public money. Spend it all lads, no one minds

Trump is trying to put his own defense contractor in.

@ajamico

7 жыл бұрын

HaoSci the f35 is such an over expensive piece of junk... if he can get a plane that is better priced with great performance, who cares if it's his own contractors

@astorothcr

7 жыл бұрын

Gonna bury those fanatic ISIS with potatoes dropped from thousands of Cessna 182s with Trump portrait printed on their wings.

@Rubafix989

7 жыл бұрын

And would help feed civilian families on the ground that gets bombed every for the last 30 years

@Demonslayer20111

7 жыл бұрын

+Blah b not our problem. that is lockheeds problem.

@ajamico

7 жыл бұрын

Blah b corrupt...as of yet there is nothing corrupt about this president. Just a bunch of pansies who can't stop whining he won. The point remains...who cares who he gives ANY American business to if he saves the American taxpayer money & wipes out ISIS in the process. Win in both categories.

Well this aged like milk.

@ImWoolly

Жыл бұрын

From the beginning it was already spoiled

And 4 years later, it’s selling like hot pancakes! That’s what happens when you have people with no idea about the technology that goes into one of these 🤣

@seankilburn7200

2 жыл бұрын

And are critical of all things related to the military

@wyguy1212

Жыл бұрын

Ok it’s selling where is that money going ? To you? To your family? To your school teachers? To your hospital? No it sells and money goes to wealthy elites who own Lockheed id rather my gov spend my tax dollars on things that would improve my life on a day to day basis

@Bruh-td7ex

Жыл бұрын

@@wyguy1212 you do realize the budget on health or care is high, the problem is that how to distribute it and either bureaucracy or other reasons.

The bottom line : buy Raytheon shares

@jaisonwaiste9575

6 жыл бұрын

This is exactly why there will be always be war..gotta keep stocks up.

@Eric-ye5yz

6 жыл бұрын

The damage caused by WW2 far out weighed any gains, and any gains made were by the few. Einstein said "I don't know what weapons will be used in the next war, but the one after will be with stones and spears".

@D2A962

6 жыл бұрын

Izno Iznogoud the true misfortune is in the masses seeming lack-of-a-desire to fight for change the same way our ancestors did. We're simply too impressed by gimmicky bullshit and will continue to be until it's far too late.

@D2A962

6 жыл бұрын

John Hall did I touch a nerve? I fail to see what wrong with my "analysis". Then again, you're an admitted participant in the military industrial complex, so I doubt we'll have much to discuss beyond the personal attacks you've already provided.

@rayologyxm

6 жыл бұрын

I should buy shares given that it shares my name

Not much is made in America anymore. But we sure can still make weapons!

@Ludwig1625

7 жыл бұрын

soapftw96 Sure

@happyjohn354

7 жыл бұрын

our country started with a war and we have persisted through war so why not?

@irfan123100

7 жыл бұрын

pew pew pew

@RandomTessellate

7 жыл бұрын

Putin and Xi approve of this message.

@evanlegee

7 жыл бұрын

iTzIvax no. Picture this, you're being attacked by the strongest man on earth who has threatened to kill you in the past. Do you want a weapon to defend yourself with or do you want to take your chances at beating him with your hands.

LazerPig gang here

this video aged like milk

You win the war in the air, you win the war. Well against a traditional military anyway. Guerrillas not so much. But against Russia we would dominate with the F35. The problem is still the nuke problem. Our current fighters are better than Russias currently but the F35s capabilites would be able to take out radar before the radar sees us, drastically reducing casualties during an air battle and an advance on the ground. I love the F35 in an ideological way, but it's preparing for the future. A future that may not come. These companies need to slow it down, take their time, and do it right.

@goozebump

7 жыл бұрын

knightimer2 exactly since nuclear warfare all these advance fighter jets are useless....go to war with any other 1st world nation and its over for everybody.

@andrewsoh1035

7 жыл бұрын

Aman Singh u touch that with a SA-400 'Grumbler'

@andrewsoh1035

7 жыл бұрын

Aman Singh u touch that with a S-400 'Grumbler'

@S1lverarrow

7 жыл бұрын

Except Russia isn't going to a war against America, and if they do, they will use Satan 2 (stealth ballistic missile with thermal nuclear warhead) which F-35 is useless against it. So stop playing Modern Warfare, Russia don't want to invade US, they don't have enough money to fund an invasion, but enough to make a weapon which F-35 would be totally useless against it.

@thatperformer3879

7 жыл бұрын

knightimer2 oh you and your false idea of patriotism, majority of the US hates our wars and just wants our troops to get out of the Middle East

The cockpit footage at 0:08 is from an F-18 EDIT: It might be an F-16, but it's definitely not an F-35. Also at 6:00

@cameronsipka3352

7 жыл бұрын

Josh Air I'm sorry :(

@dgallari4370

7 жыл бұрын

It's an f16

@axpetre

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and at 2:26 he talks about Sikorsky helicopters, but showing a Eurocopter Tiger instead. It makes you wonder how many facts they get right when they're making so many avoidable mistakes.

@mrjpb23

7 жыл бұрын

It's just B roll, give them a break. The only thing factually incorrect is the info graphic at 5:40, none of the models will have "2 engines," and it's the Marine model that melts flight decks in VTOL mode, not the Navy variant.

@chillbro1010

7 жыл бұрын

But aren't the marines just part of the navy? And yes, im just saying this to piss off any marines.

I work as a contractor, and the way my boss explains is this." At the end of the day, it's a jobs program."

@mart1jin509

2 жыл бұрын

I could think of more effecient job building programs.

@imcrazyforwar

2 жыл бұрын

@@mart1jin509 u could, but u need lobbyist with more money than them

@prolarka

2 жыл бұрын

@@mart1jin509 They are not living in that part of the world where they are required to be efficient.

Since the video, the F35 appears to be finally working and knocking everything out of the sky, including the F22.

@neofil69

3 жыл бұрын

It is working, when it is far away from lightning 😂😂

@xSupra

3 жыл бұрын

@@neofil69 I mean, that goes for like every other plane. Same with birds.

@Spudtron98

3 жыл бұрын

@@xSupra Yeah, turns out plane engines don't tend to react well to having big hunks of meat being shot through them at several hundred kilometres per hour.

@UptownDegree

3 жыл бұрын

F 35 is an excellent plane now

@CannonFodder873

3 жыл бұрын

@@UptownDegree ...with a restricted operational envelope due to design errors.🤣

From Vox, the fighter jet experts of the world.

@MrProtopopescovici

6 жыл бұрын

you don't need to be an expert to see that funneling billions of dollars into a failure is just bad, economically speaking. ( it's a failure that was kept afloat by money basically ). Imagine the millions of americans that paid their taxes for nothing. I would be mad to find out that my tax dollars went to this to be honest with you. No free healthcare. But this is way better right? 10.6 billion dollars, do you know how much that is? America is a breeding ground for corruption, if you want to fix your country you should start by making lobbying illegal. Because thats where the whole problem starts.

@davidgreen5099

6 жыл бұрын

Alex Tiberiu and I don't need your caustic remarks, vox is full of bullshit.

@johnhull2582

6 жыл бұрын

If you don't definitively know what a word means, look it up before using it. Your words are caustic, not Alex's.

@davidgreen5099

6 жыл бұрын

i know what caustic means.and his words are that.

@johnhull2582

6 жыл бұрын

caus·tic ˈkôstik/Submit adjective 1. able to burn or corrode organic tissue by chemical action. "a caustic cleaner" synonyms: corrosive, corroding, abrasive, mordant, acid "a caustic cleaner" 2. sarcastic in a scathing and bitter way.

I agree with trump on this

@zrbbg9639

6 жыл бұрын

Agamemno Contingency Me too.

@asmrgamer3266

6 жыл бұрын

He’ll use the savings to build a wall

@stupidburp

6 жыл бұрын

Super Hornets are not the right replacements though, updated F-22 and F-15 are.

@tsu8003

6 жыл бұрын

And Trump saves money by giving huge American companies a massive tax cut! Sounds like pure hypocrisy to me!

Yeah a single f 35 would wipe the floor against a squadron of su 35s

@CaptinPelley

Жыл бұрын

Pov you are a flanker pilot and you and your entire flight get wiped out by a single salvo of amraams launched from an f35 and guided in by awacs 300 nm away

@reb9977

Жыл бұрын

@@CaptinPelley the f 35 won't even take off in the first place

@englandismycity181

Жыл бұрын

@@reb9977 clear footage of the F-35 flying in the first second of the video

This did not age well.

I can totally see trump watching this for educational purposes

@sorrygod5649

7 жыл бұрын

Who doesn't

@CallsignYukiMizuki

7 жыл бұрын

TV? Is that a rare seasonal drop?

@santosgessy70

7 жыл бұрын

He wouldn't understand a word they're saying

@mrjpb23

7 жыл бұрын

He's still digesting the school house rock video on how a bill becomes a law.

@frozeneternity93

7 жыл бұрын

*Said in a Russian accent In Soviet America, Trump educates you!

I think the worst thing about turning 7 years old was losing my delusion that adults had this stuff figured out

So it's not a disaster after all

What a bunch of garbage. It’s a good platform.

Very interesting stuff. Lots of well-presented information. But know that ALL aircraft have developmental problems. EVERY single one - military or commercial. The F-35 is anything but a disaster. It will survive and thrive at some point. And actually, the special needs of the different branches brings the cost way down considering they all start from the same airframe. Imagine all branches getting their own bespoke asset!

Vox, given this and a few other defense related videos you've made; it's pretty clear you guys haven't paid any more than a cursory glance (if that) on weapons procurement and military doctrine. The "military industrial complex" - something that's become sort of a mainstream conspiracy caricature - didn't stop Fairchild from running out of business. If the military wants your equipment, you'll stay; if not, you're gone. Boeing's tanker, cargo and EW aircraft contracts had absolutely nothing to do with the JSF, you're really grasping at straws there. Concurrency has been around since WW1, it's still a point of debate to this day on how it can be effectively utilized; so it's disingenuous to assert the idea as inherently faulty. *The F35 has been delayed so long, it's now unclear whether the US military even needs it anymore.* This is an outright lie. By your own video, the program began in the 90's - what was the need for a hyper advanced jack-of-all-trades fighter post Soviet collapse? The fighter wasn't intended for combatting insurgencies or current technologies, it's part of the Third Offset. The fact that it's abilities exceed that of anyone else's today was wholly intended, not a legitimate point of critique. This last bit cemented my suspicion that whoever made this was utterly clueless about the JSF program. Edit: And before someone brings up another evidence of corruption, *I'm not arguing that it doesn't occur, I'm arguing that it's relevance is overblown.* The defense industry is no more susceptible to corruption than other industries. It contributes to less than 2% of GDP, yet you never hear about the "real estate-industrial-complex", generating triple that.

@ChucksSEADnDEAD

7 жыл бұрын

Look, the government is up to the eyes in cronyism, the Affordable Care Act was not a move towards better healthcare, it was the result of politicians being bought off by the businesses that would profit from forcing everyone to enroll in the program and eliminating health insurances that didn't "get with the program". Fairchild probably ran out of friends in Congress, I'd have to look into that situation myself. But are you seriously questioning the "one hand washes the other" mentality? The contracts had nothing to do with the JSF, so that excludes the possibility of handshakes under the table? Come on.

@realjohnsmith96

7 жыл бұрын

+Filipe Amaral All the alleged cronyism that the government is constantly accused of and yet the vast majority of them are still in office. I guess the watchdogs were bought off as well? Handshakes between who over what? I'm not interested in possibilities.

@ChucksSEADnDEAD

7 жыл бұрын

***** So you're telling me that for example Richard C Blum, husband of Sen Feinstein, was never benefitted by his wife's activities? You're seriously implying that just because nobody got shitcanned for it, then Lockheed doesn't have their people in congress? Why buy watchdogs? You can look up every conflict of interest for yourself, they're being reported on, everyone is just too busy keeping up with the Kardashians.

@amcghie7

7 жыл бұрын

A agree mostly with what you are saying, however you must admit that concurrency in this case at least, has been faulty - considering that the F-35 has had the problems it has. This may have been because they were utilising undeveloped technology into the mix.

@realjohnsmith96

7 жыл бұрын

Even Andy That could be one of several factors involved though. Vox presented it simply as, *But it's a flawed practice that has delayed...* Easy to point fingers, harder to prove. Other reasons include that this isn't something we've done before. Sure, we've built other multipurpose vehicles before; but not to the F35's extent or complexity. Many of it's central systems are required to run independently should the others fail. We don't have anything like that for predecessor aircraft - apart from maybe a two engine design. Couple that with the fact that this is effectively a peacetime project, you don't get the same leeway over something as little as a software bug. You also have the issue of dealing with evolving requirements that the product cycle has to keep up with. The F35 we have today is not the same one on paper 20ish years ago. I could go on, but concurrency is not - as they present - the inherently faulty practice that is solely responsible for delays motivated by the military industrial complex' attempt to cut corners. A lot of the hooplah we hear about the JSF today are, curiously enough, similar to that when the F4 Phantom was first introduced.

The Military Industrial Complex, the very thing that Dwight Eisenhower warned about in his farewell address in 1961. "We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists,"

@lorenzoblum868

2 жыл бұрын

The carbon footprint of the military industrial complex too...

This aged like milk

Eisenhower told us, but we chose to ignore his warning.

It’s supposed to replace all fighters for the next 50 years. It’s not as expensive as they make it out to be in the long run.

@davidemartorana4708

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah but It's more expensive to purchase and operate than everything else and it's not even ready yet

@richj24

4 жыл бұрын

Davide Martorana They finished the project and deliveries are being made to US allies....

@dumdumbinks274

4 жыл бұрын

@@davidemartorana4708 There are several well known fighters that cost more to purchase and operate. The F-15 is one of them despite the infrastructure to maintain it being in place since the 1970s.

@UptownDegree

3 жыл бұрын

F 35A cost is actually pretty good

@seankilburn7200

2 жыл бұрын

@@davidemartorana4708 costs have already dropped considerably now that production has ramped up

this video aged like military grade kerosene

Stop talking trash about the f 35 and read the real stats

Vox says that Trump is right what is this? lol

@vg666

7 жыл бұрын

Vegetable unbiased reporting?

@hungthepro1234

7 жыл бұрын

what are they trying to get is that of at the end. Of how this decision is too big to fail and when it is made to fail, Trump will only hurts himself

@leuvenfra

7 жыл бұрын

Vegetable Further proof that Vox isn't as biased as conservatives like to pretend. It's easier claiming the media is rigged than to face the facts.

@onomatopoeia162003

7 жыл бұрын

Eisenhower was right

@yulbahbo232

7 жыл бұрын

From all the backlash they had been receiving on multiple topic for being biased they were well under way to go down like CNN. When this happens to a media organization they have to put their bias aside and try to regain their credibility in order to be able manipulate the facts in the future.

as a liberal- but also a veteran- i have to say the amount of uniformed people in this thread is alarming. I mean sure, not everyone already knew about this stuff, fine. but the f-35 is head and shoulders above anything else except perhaps the f-22. "why do we need them when our enemies don't have air forces?" because serious threats like Russia and China do, and our fleet is truly aging. I mean old AF. any country that wants to maintain its security and the security of other obviously or arguably helpless nations like Japan, Taiwan, Ukraine, half of Europe or even australia, need to keep the edge, and we are LUCKY enough to have it, hands down. (the whole military- carriers, warplanes, equipment for ground troops, etc.) also, having a superpower truly decreases conflicts around the globe, because there isn't equal power capability between potentially violent nations- so they have to curtail their violent plans and be more diplomatic so they aren't crushed by a superpowers overwhelming forces. anyway, this is not just fear mongering- China has been grabbing up territory that doesn't belong to them in the South China Sea and they've been looking at other countries like a bear looks at a steak. we NEED the f-35 to maintain dominance in the skies and protect our ground forces in the event of any conflict. period. and nothing comes close the flawed f35, according to test pilots around the globe- and they are barely scratching the surface of its potential. just wait until the remaining (and really not many) kinks are worked out and the pilots master the aircraft. if anything, my criticism is the early mismanagement of the program and just plain old hubris- trying to pack 30 years of future proof into one airframe. but now that it's here, science help the invaders of defenseless countries if it happens.

@samgerland6087

7 жыл бұрын

Doesn't matter, its a waste of time to do all of these investments into war accessories. All of these resources should be invested in infinite energy

@josephpenn1115

7 жыл бұрын

Sam G >infinite energy energy cannot be created or destroyed only transferred infinite energy is completely in all ways impossible

@tysondoesstuff4911

7 жыл бұрын

in the position America is in right now, nobody wants any help from Americans... and why is china a threat? Just cause the US owes them 18 trillion dollars does not make them a threat...

@tysondoesstuff4911

7 жыл бұрын

That would be great! If it were POSSIBLE!

@TheNondiscriminatory

7 жыл бұрын

Joseph Penn someone who understands basic physics. thank you 🤗

"A nation that spends more on weapons than programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death." MLK

@Kirovets7011

3 жыл бұрын

And that is the TRUTH!!!

@46-uzairali49

3 жыл бұрын

You have spoken the Truth

@danielmocsny5066

3 жыл бұрын

The USA has the world's largest military by far, but even so the US government doesn't spend more money on weapons than on social programs. However, the USA is approaching "spiritual death" for other reasons, such as the fact that science is real and gods are imaginary.

@ungratefulninja4535

3 жыл бұрын

@Nick Milligan how's that been turning out over here or there?

@BitcoinSucker

3 жыл бұрын

That’s exactly where they plan to take you

A Lockheed jet that is a disaster? Cough Cough Starfighter Cough Cough.

@demanischaffer

3 жыл бұрын

The starfighter was only a "disaster" in undertrained German pilots hands, the Italians loved them enough to fly them well beyond anyone else

@xSupra

3 жыл бұрын

@@demanischaffer Yep.

@EragonShadowSlasher

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah india beat up pak starfighters lol

@lucastekkan

3 жыл бұрын

@@EragonShadowSlasher not something to be proud of lol

Thank you so much for including sources! Helped me out with my research paper!

@Yeetstar_Goofy

Жыл бұрын

Good one

Keep in mind that this exact aircraft got a 20:1 kill ratio at the latest Red Flag.

@jamesdrake3651

7 жыл бұрын

"Kill ratios attributed to a platform naturally make us think of direct engagements with enemy aircraft, but Red Flag is a highly integrated air battle, one that always uses the latest data-link fusing gateways and other force-multipliers. It remains unclear whether the stated kill ratio is strictly attributable to the F-35, or if it includes the actions of other coalition aircraft, particularly F-22s, while the F-35 is merely present. " www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/7488/lets-talk-about-those-f-35-kill-ratio-reports-from-red-flag

@demanischaffer

6 жыл бұрын

James Drake Nope pilots reported the F22's weren't in the same areas as the F35

@demanischaffer

6 жыл бұрын

Hugh Jarce The F35 win to loss ratio is for all of the F-35's not just one, that's not how a win to loss ratio works for an aircraft type

@demanischaffer

6 жыл бұрын

Izno Iznogoud Pretty sure people had the same argument for the F15 minus the stealth

@demanischaffer

6 жыл бұрын

Izno Iznogoud And you say it isn't good because the F117 was a hanger queen, the F117 was an early Gen stealth aircraft, of course it was a hanger queen it was the first of it's kind, but I'm pretty sure people called the F15 and the F22 hanger queens at first

Props to vox for keeping this up despite being so wrong

F-18 started out as a waste of money too, all new fighters do

@holographicsteve7338

6 жыл бұрын

People have such short memories ... or they are too young to remember when "the M1-Abrams sucked too much gas and had air-filters which clogged". ...

@nimrodquimbus912

6 жыл бұрын

Exactly, once they get the bugs worked out, the F35 will be a great jet, plus, the Marines and Navy will get a stealth plane. F35 was really made to replace any particular airplane, but rather to add capabilities to what the Navy, Air-force, and Marines already have.

@holographicsteve7338

6 жыл бұрын

And now Elbit is beginning to offer the same virtual helmet display to to Army air and ground vehicle!

@nimrodquimbus912

6 жыл бұрын

US Navy, US Taxpayer

@jellyfrosh9102

6 жыл бұрын

the difference being we don't need the F-35.