Reminds me of the "hot dogs" deck that used to be popular in pauper. Who ever names this needs to call it Hot wings

@carsonbos472

Ай бұрын

That name idea is awesome, bravo

wooded foothills + Prismatic vista = 7 fetches that get mountain or forest

@Kryptnyt

Ай бұрын

Think the idea might be that every land has to be able to cast Fireblast so basic forest in a way is a no-go

Love when decks get to do their thing in the first game, doubly so when its quite as spectacular as that first game

As someone who play Death's Shadow + Berserk 10+ years ago, I love this deck!

I love how both you and BoshNRoll immediately forget the name of that card as soon as it leaves the screen. You know, the, uh... Slickdog Sureshuck.

@ThrabenUniversity

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂

@Kryptnyt

Ай бұрын

Put some respect on Smugshit Sherriff's name

Bauble delay draw is too slow imo. Cut the 8 baubles and petals for 4 Rite of flame and 4 manamorphose. Add land grant as well. That’s where I would start.

@Ph3xian

Ай бұрын

Land Grant should be great

@keithbarlow9701

Ай бұрын

Land Grant does seem like it's worth trying out.

@apocalypsecod

Ай бұрын

Land grant would be pretty spicy here.

@danielhall9050

Ай бұрын

Land grant is a really good idea! The baubles seem kinda necessary for DRC, maybe trim some and go up in petals for artifact type? I think manamorphose might be too expensive but it does cycle

@kyleucf

Ай бұрын

@@danielhall9050 yea I’m not 100% convinced DRC is actually a sacred cow here. Probably still the best threat after the haste guys but unsure. You could do something like 2 bauble, 2 petal, 2 tarfire or something like that if you are really worried about delerium but you do have a pretty good mix of the main for types to hit on. Seek the beast is another option for threats.

At 49:50, Lightning Bolt is not a concern, but didn't they just get the Fireblast you cast under their Voidwalker? Grief attack plus Fireblast would have been lethal.

@nadavperry2267

Ай бұрын

hmmm, yeah guess they both missed that.

@dragemit

Ай бұрын

i also thought this. curious if there is a reason they couldn't?

@kurii-

Ай бұрын

Came to say the same thing.

@smoki102

Ай бұрын

yeep, was also thinking of that

@silphonym

Ай бұрын

so actually, for this reason would the correct line have been to swing, not cast the fireblast, go to one presumably, and then attack the following turn +fireblast? or should the fireblast be used to kill dauthi and get the opponent to five?

49:55 you were dead on board and opponent didn't see the out. Grief hits for 3 and then Dauthi casts a free Fireblast for exact lethal!

This has been basically my list for legacy nights for a while now, I have switched up a little to add brainstorm and ponder instead of the hyper burn elements. Thanks for showcasing something I didn’t know others were playing!

God I love watching decks that test when its time to go full leadfoot

I'm so happy you got to do the thing in the very first game 😂 I love berserk so much

I played with an Izzet version that felt pretty tasty.

49:42 couldn't opponent attack with Grief, and use Fireblast off Dauthi to win?

@gius8068

Ай бұрын

I think so too, it seems they missed the line

I think the mindbreak trap was a mistake for the opponent in round 3. Mindbreak trap is fine against any deck looking to cast many impactful spells in a turn, but prowess is not really one of those decks. The creatures are what matter, then casting spells, but those spells don't really matter much individually. Also hurting their mana by playing a blue card instead of literally any red card for chrome mox was a big deal in game 2.

@AaronRotenberg

Ай бұрын

Rule of Law effects, on the other hand, can be very good against Prowess. I suspect the opponent just had Mindbreak Trap lumped together in their head with those and boarded it in without thinking about it enough to realize it doesn't really work that well.

@silphonym

Ай бұрын

I think there is a little more nuance here, but you're probably right overall. I would add that specifically Berserk could be answered with it, and it was quite unlikely and unlucky that it became public information due to bauble.

53:50 you did have outs involving light up the stage. It was very very unlikely though so I don't blame you for scooping.

He brings out a pimp named slickshot

Could play 4 prismatic vista 4 wooded foothills 1 taiga 1 forest

Was there any thought to playing Lava Dart or is that more of a Modern card?

19:00 bully Phil is best Phil

in the very last round of the last game when you conceded, in theory, if i'm not missing something, u could've cast slickshot and just thrown it infront of murktide with mutagenics through force of negation. as long as they tap out wasteland twice to not cut the price of progress damage AND deploy another land AND fail to have further interaction, there was a chance xD

out all the bubbles for rite of flames

19:00 Maniacal laugh is for the ages

I cannot belive it took so long for you to play Slikshot

Hell yeah, now this is some cowboy magic

18:53 evil Phil laugh

15:50 am I missing something about bolt+gut shot here? They're on 5 life

@Jeremy-gy7me

Ай бұрын

They would have to force one of the bolts, which costs 1 life.

In round 3, game 1, if I'm not mistaken, you can cast berserk at sorcery speed on the opponents tapped Broadside Bombardiers and make them sac it at the end of turn right? That way you don't end up taking extra damage.

@twodo

Ай бұрын

Has to attack and has to be cast before damage

@jasonslade6259

Ай бұрын

Berserk has a really weird timing restriction where you can only cast it during the combat damage setp.

This deck is my shot of whiskey 🤠🤠🤠

i want to play W/R ocelot soul sisters when mh3 drops. got a list ready for mtgo testing.

Nice

Are plotted cards face up exiled?

With 13 lands, the MH2 card would’ve been really good. The one mana call land or non land and reveal until you hit whatever you called. Someone will know the name.

@alexortiz9777

Ай бұрын

Abundant Harvest but I dont see how its good here

Burn feels pretty good in the current legacy scene, especially if you don't have to fight against combo which seems like a bad MU. This deck gets a thumbs up from me

@49:42 Couldn't the opponent just Fireblast you wtih Dauthi and kill with Grief? O.o I think casting Fireblast there before lethal is definitely a mistake.

Woah your name changed to DB thrabenU?! What happened to Madea Magica?!

@ThrabenUniversity

Ай бұрын

I have two accounts. One is for the creator program.

6:44 "There's no nuance to this sideboard" 47:15 - "Unsure, need to see a little more of the deck to kind of sus out the nuances." [about sideboarding] 🤔😄

If you want to kill a creature with Berserk, you can casr it in second main. The end step trigger will still resolve because it attacked this turn. You don't have to take double damage from the creature you buff.

@lonewolf975

Ай бұрын

First line of text of berserk says cast only before the combat damage step

@ThrabenUniversity

Ай бұрын

Please reread Berserk.

"Good job playing to your outs" Doesn't play to his outs, I wanted to see what would happen in that final round, It takes you 15 seconds to just see what happens. Never know, opponent could just draw lands the rest of the game and we win. Otherwise phenomenal video!

In round 3, you could have Berserked the Broadside on your turn to kill it during your turn.

@Konradexius

Ай бұрын

Berserk only kills if the creature attacks

@jaytdl9041

Ай бұрын

Correct but it's still considered attacking in damage after taking two, so it was possible to save two life by casting it in damage.

@dragemit

Ай бұрын

berserk only kills a creature if it attacked that turn

@ThrabenUniversity

Ай бұрын

Please reread Berserk.

@ThrabenUniversity

Ай бұрын

Please reread Berserk.

Video being an hour long for such an aggressive deck is mildly concerning, hopefully doesn’t mean it just lost a bunch of games.

Round 1 Match 2 the final turn burn sequencing is objectively not the optimal line. It should be Lightening Bolt to draw out the FoW and take the opponent down to 4, then follow up with Lightening Bolt and Gutshot to finish them off.

@cdadamly

Ай бұрын

This is debatable since the opponent draws a card for each spell that targets due to Leovold. That is what Phil was mulling over.

@andrewshuman6851

Ай бұрын

@@cdadamly Two cards in hand are more powerful and can be played around rather than 2 cards from the top of the deck.

@Konradexius

Ай бұрын

So, you agree your initial statement is wrong?

@andrewshuman6851

Ай бұрын

@@Konradexius No

@fartface8918

Ай бұрын

The word objectively is a insanely huge fault point in your statement, it's not even like intrinsically wrong to say your line would be better but Leovold very clearly makes it not clear the bar of objectively better