You will like this video if you like Bradley, and if you don't you will probably change your mind. Enjoy the video. To view 18+ content become a sponsor of this channel: kzread.info/dron/NyH_tBz6Hyzqx-tIfQJIKQ.htmljoin Members-only videos: kzread.info/head/UUMONyH_tBz6Hyzqx-tIfQJIKQ

@yosh8758

Ай бұрын

wow are you selling nudes behind a youtube paywall??

@SylvanasCry

Ай бұрын

Why are you blurring out the logo of the Ukrainian brigades in all videos? Is this content published with their consent?

@aaronmicalowe

Ай бұрын

5:51 I think it was too close range to use TOW. It wouldn't have exploded on impact.

@amigo...007

Ай бұрын

All video from and to full fake....The equipment has no recognisable signs of Donbas army.... Russian. At the moment when the camera brings the equipment closer the pixel lighting of the equipment is switched on at once that would not be visible signs of the army of Ukraine.....All this is ridiculous....Russians are beating...destroying NATO equipment....and Nato will lose this war.....

@jweems47

Ай бұрын

Post a link to the video showing , not to all of your uncensored videos.

The troops are worth more than the equipment. No vehicle is completely indestructible some do better than others. The lives are saved which is what its built for.

@rastislavstanik

Ай бұрын

in ruzzia, troops are filling for the meat cube

@justanaverageguy912

Ай бұрын

@AlexAndr-qu6wy trying hard, huh?

@vladyslavoliinyk6722

Ай бұрын

Для рашістів танк чі БТР набагато цінніший ніж сотня їхніх рабів-солдат . Тому й гонять тисячі на забій . В них навіть пропагандист один застрелився з-за того що ніхто не розказував за гігантські втрати рашістів під Авдіївкою де по його словах тільки загиблими більше 16 000 (наша розвідка називала 18 000).

@kwslife116

Ай бұрын

Seems pretty clear to me. 😅​@AlexAndr-qu6wy

@rastislavstanik

Ай бұрын

@AlexAndr-qu6wy ask putler

The best part about the Bradley vs T90 is that the gunner was at least aware of the general weak points by playing War Thunder. You never know when that knowledge might come in handy.

@gusew9102

Ай бұрын

Там он разве один был?

@alexstrelchuk7967

Ай бұрын

All work in that battle was done

@staytune96

Ай бұрын

and what? still, entire Ardivvka take over by Russia

@samuelkolt8777

Ай бұрын

@@staytune96потому что Россия, самая сильная страна в мире…

@user-di1mq8zq9b

Ай бұрын

Tank still managed to escape from 2 Bradley’s

I trained in the Bradly back in 1994, our own instructors would tell us the Bradly is probably a death box and that a 50 caliber MG would swiss cheese it.. watching these videos- those Sargents were either trolling us or had no idea what they were talking about according to these videos.

@RS-vu3df

Ай бұрын

Most probably the armour was updated in the last...30 years.

@gorillaump5869

Ай бұрын

@@RS-vu3df true that!

@soup31314

Ай бұрын

The Bradley in 1994 was m2a2. These are m2a2 ods.. your instructors at either benning or Knox were slick sleeve nco.

@gorillaump5869

Ай бұрын

@soup31314 Ft.Benning AIT was combined with basic training so we were the lucky ones to get a few extra weeks at basic.

@soup31314

Ай бұрын

@@gorillaump5869 i was at benning B co 2-54 July-Nov 1994

Being a Ukrainian, I can confirm that we really appreciate this vehicle and I want to thank the United States and all partners for their help. Without you, we would not exist and the world would be different.

@Music___Hub_

Ай бұрын

Debil

@MagicTracksProduction

29 күн бұрын

@@jegorandrejev2497 Dolboyob, why was such assistance from US and UK in 41-45 was ok and for Ukraine is no ok? Tell me, Dolboyob.

@jegorandrejev2497

29 күн бұрын

@@MagicTracksProduction Dolboyob is in your mirror reflection. Did I insult you?used any offensive words? No!Then respect each other as human beings. I said all I wanted to say in my previous comment.Full stop

@MagicTracksProduction

29 күн бұрын

@@jegorandrejev2497 Dolboyob, why was such assistance from US and UK in 41-45 was ok and for Ukraine is no ok? Tell me, Dolboyob.

@Kokainkiseleok

29 күн бұрын

​​​@@MagicTracksProductionсказал мамкин sykin сын с дивана с черкашами с Богом забытой хрюкаины!) 😂😂😂😂

Considering how much verbal abuse the Bradley got in the past, I think an apology is in order!

@whytebearconcepts

Ай бұрын

In DS it deserved the verbal abuse. What we're seeing here is almost a completely different vehicle. At least they're not killing their own vehicles like we did in 1991.

@pinkfloyd870

Ай бұрын

@@whytebearconcepts Ukraiian soldiers are competent.... AmeriKan ones are not.

@whytebearconcepts

Ай бұрын

@@pinkfloyd870 Yeah, we had a lot of problems in Desert Storm. Up to that point we'd been training for the forests of eastern Europe. 30+ years on and we're still getting it wrong. But it's not that the troops are bad, it's that the training is still getting it wrong. I was artillery, in 1977 we trained for Russians coming into Europe from the east. In DS91 we spent more time fixing our gun that actually fighting with it.

@pinkfloyd870

Ай бұрын

@@whytebearconcepts Respect, my friend

@Subhumanoid_

Ай бұрын

ODS was all sand and we know what sand does and so does Anakin - it gets in everywhere.

Ukraine will be the world's largest recycling center in 2025

@JohnnyD45

Ай бұрын

😂

@tesha199

Ай бұрын

Ukraine won't exist in 2025

@pinkfloyd870

Ай бұрын

That is ruZZia today.... and I don't think it will get any better for them, so your point is pretty stupid.

@cookudysu90

Ай бұрын

Ukraine will be the biggest scrap metal dealer in Eastern Europe

@maksym9629

Ай бұрын

recycling of bio garbage from russia

It hurts my heart to know that each of this buildings were once used by families, that they built stone by stone to have their own home, which is pretty expensive. All to be destroyed because a group of men decide they want to be in history books because they restored the stupid concept of an "empire". I hate politicans even so I'm for ukraine

@utrukkurtu7293

Ай бұрын

You are talking about the Pax Americana that pokes its nose to every country and leaves a trail of destruction, right?

@user-hy9eu9rd3h

Ай бұрын

@@utrukkurtu7293 pnx 🐔

@Perqd

Ай бұрын

@@utrukkurtu7293 sure start pointing at things besides the point to move away from the original point, very big brain move

@utrukkurtu7293

Ай бұрын

@@user-hy9eu9rd3h Wanna an acorn?

@user-jk4yp6fh4h

Ай бұрын

Originsl point was NATO expansion to the east ​@@Perqd

They didn't "forget" about the TOW. The commander of the Brad explained he decided he couldn't get a good shot with the TOW because they wanted to stay mobile. You can see the advantage they get from the awesome stabilization of the Brads bushmaster, maintaining fire on target as they cruise around.

Trade offer: You give us Bradleys, we give you epic KZread footage. _press A to accept_

@jester3536

Ай бұрын

одна бредли стоит 3 ляма баксов, я думаю тебе прийдется ещё очком торгонуть за неё))

@fi_roks8857

27 күн бұрын

​@@jester3536если не ошыбаюсь 2.5 ляма, разница большая

@garryKra

25 күн бұрын

​@@jester3536что значит придётся, они вовсю торгуют уже.

@TheKorolariya

3 күн бұрын

@@jester3536 могут взять недостающие деньги со счетов олигархов российских в Европе и США, да и Эмираты могут задонатить у них старые счёты с Путиным, Япония помогает, у них тоже какие то тёрки с РФ, Южная Корея потому как северная им немного не нравится

@TheKorolariya

3 күн бұрын

@@jester3536 Я даже больше скажу российские бизнесмены скупили хороший процент акций той же Бредли, и зарабатывают на этом тоже, но бабки в РФ не приходят, сейчас там только через Казахстан, который тоже Украине помогает. Вообще РФ доить стали намного сильнее чем раньше.

5:50 Bradley didn't use TOW, because it was heading back from a mission to cover troops, so no TOW was left aftre the misison

@kennethferland5579

Ай бұрын

Yea, Bradly only carries 2 in the launcher, and while it is possible to carry reloads inside thats going to displace infantry men from riding inside. American doctrine would call for a Bradly to only use it's TOW missiles defensivly due to this limited supply and allow accompanying tanks to take the lead in engaging enemy tanks, but thouse tactics are intended for whole companies of mixed IFV and Tanks to use in a mass battle. Ukraine's tactics are different as the numbers of vehicles each side engages at a time are so much smaller, the Bradly will be emptying it's launcher often and in an offensive mannor.

@TrainTruck

Ай бұрын

I was also thinking that most times the TOW missile would be a last use with specially the Ukraine needing to make sure that every shot counts or if in counter another tank. As they do have a limit on ammos of usage for the front lines and with them to probably also having them types of tanks in stock as well could also understand how to take them down.

@juryfilatov4520

4 күн бұрын

There is one point, this Bradley is used by the Ukrainian army - they probably just don't have these missiles.

From what I understand, the Bradley has become a favorite piece of Ukrainian equipment...fast, good sights and very good armor....a replacement is being designed that uses a 50mm gun that fires next generation ammunition, programmable and powerful.

The most important, and expensive unit on the field, isnt the machines, its the people/soliders.

@TornadoCAN99

Ай бұрын

Yes, some 20+ yrs to grow/train up a soldier vs a few days/weeks to assemble a fighting vehicle.

@baronxsa

Ай бұрын

Not for Russia, they never cared about it, people are meat

@endurohorizon1128

Ай бұрын

это так

@pavel_tsygankov

Ай бұрын

Поэтому Запад и начал воевать с Россией руками украинцев, там этот материал бесплатный

@damonburroughs5283

16 күн бұрын

​@@pavel_tsygankovthe west never started a fight with Russia , it was the other way round. Russia has invaded many countries in the last 30 years

Just one thing I noticed about the narration. You kept saying APC, Bradley is an IFV infantry fighting vehicle. Yes, there is a difference.

@Aurxa09

Ай бұрын

BMP is like a IFV but BMP has more firepower

@asscold13

Ай бұрын

​@@Aurxa09"The BMP is a heavy infantry fighting vehicle on tracks. The Soviet BTR is the equivalent of an MRAP but with greater off-road capability."

@aymonfoxc1442

Ай бұрын

I heard him say "Russian APCs" a lot, but you're right, I think he did call the Bradley an APC a few times. I've noticed the Ukrainians often call it an APC as well - perhaps because it gets somewhat lost in translation or because doctrinally / tactically, they use them the same way?

@forexed8948

Ай бұрын

According to the comedy "Pentagon Wars" Bradley was supposed to be an APC, but overtime transformed into an IFV. But that's just for comedy.

@Inugami0622

28 күн бұрын

​@@Aurxa09 APC does not have more firepower than a IFV. The APC serves as a transport vehicle for infantry to mount and dismount from point A to point B and is only armed with a machine gun on top for self defense only. The IFV however, serves as the main weapon system for mechanized infantry and provide close support for them with firepower like autocannons and sometimes missiles for anti tank purposes, although it can transport infantry, it cannot transport as much infantry as the APC can.

Bradley fire rate is very impresive ..

Big thanks to all you foreign guys who making this type of content. While war situation in my country is far from good content like this is keeping people like me in positive mindset.❤ from 🇺🇦 🫶

@WladimirDanilov

Ай бұрын

Какой позитив? У твоей страны отвоёвывают село за селом каждый день. Никакие брэдли не помогают.

@zombiro92

Ай бұрын

Ого, село за селом. Прям блицкриг получается 😁 почему тогда за 2 года даже донецкую область не захватили?​@@WladimirDanilov

@WladimirDanilov

Ай бұрын

@@zombiro92 ну ты смотришь военные сводки? Последние месяцы только идёт наступление. Сейчас каждый день одно или несколько сёл русские освобождают

@zombiro92

Ай бұрын

@@WladimirDanilov чел, я хочу тебе напомнить, что "эсвэо" идёт третий год, а ты говоришь об захвате сел численностью 200-400 человек. До чего докатилась вторая армия мира?😁 Америкосы Иран победили за пол года, с учётом того, что у Ирана мощнее армия Украины была. А тут за почти 2,5 года пару сел захватили😁

@user-gl7mt6bc7w

Ай бұрын

@@WladimirDanilov ну так а недавно Херсон оставили и с под Харькова сбежали, это война..., посмотрим что будет через пол года-год, то что инициатива перешла рф обоснованно задержкой американской помощи, которую наконец начали поставлять так что война еще не окончена.

I hope they do send more. It's realistic and an effective tool to protect the infantry.

@user-hq3wx4zr5h

Ай бұрын

Ты русских то же жди , они придут за тобой🫡

@pinkfloyd870

Ай бұрын

hopefully they won't send all the broken ones AGAIN

@rossi0202

Ай бұрын

Nobody can't understand orc language

@Thetequilashooter1

Ай бұрын

@@pinkfloyd870Liar.

@Thetequilashooter1

Ай бұрын

@@user-hq3wx4zr5hLOL, it’s the Russians who are getting slaughtered.

the sittuation with the bradley against the T90, the crew later did an interview and the gunner stated that because of War Thunder he knew to aim for the optics and where the optics were located.

@TheMAKS702

Ай бұрын

А в чем успех Бредли то? В том что обстреляли пол боекомплекта в упор по неисправному танку и ничегошеньки не смогли с ним сделать? А если бы на месте т-90м был Абрамс,а его с такого расстояния разбирала бы БМП -2 из 30мм пушки? Уцелел бы экипаж как на т-90м? Очень я в этом сомневаюсь..Так что в том эпизоде Бредли показал себя полностью бесполезной техникой против современных танков России..

@evgeniy9941

Ай бұрын

​@@TheMAKS702 Там экипаж лупанул из пушки в ручную зазядили так эти на бредлях обосрались и дали возможность танкистам ути.

@user-be3fh9et2o

Ай бұрын

@@TheMAKS702танк не исправный стал после того как его Брэдли обстреляло. Победа Брэдли

@TheMAKS702

Ай бұрын

@@user-be3fh9et2o Нет он получил повреждения оптики и механизма поворота башни ,экипаж покинул танк только после прилёта фпв дрона в борт с боевой частью от РПГ,а так Бредли ничего не смогла сделать с танком только повредить ,но я скажу больше повредить можно что угодно вон в Ираке Абрамс сожгли из ДШК 12,7мм и что это значит что ДШК уничтожит Абрамс всегда и всюду? Нет ,просто сложились обстоятельства, и повторюсь Бредли стреляя в упор по т-90м уничтожить его не смогла это есть факт,а остальное домыслы..И уверен настоящие профи в Пентагоне крепко задумались как нарастить огневую мощь Бредли ибо то что есть фактически катастрофа..

@user-be3fh9et2o

Ай бұрын

@@TheMAKS702 танк стал небоеспособен именно из-за обстрела со стороны Брэдли. Он и не мог его уничтожить, используя лишь пушку. Голову включай сам. Катастрофа у Т-90 случилась, а у Брэдли наоборот победа. Про подбитый Абрамс из ДШК сказок поменьше читай.

I remember in the 1980s when the know-nothings complained bitterly about the M2, saying it was a tank with a small gun and all the guys inside would be killed if a Soviet tank hit it. I tried explaining the difference between an APC and a main battle tank to them, and to assure them that the army's tactic was not to send APCs charging at MBTs. It looks like the M2 is a star, and I was right yet again.

The Bradleys lost in battle were a result of sending them to the front line without air support, which would not happen with any Western / NATO Army.

@ivanivanov6548

Ай бұрын

Omg omg...what about you talking....Did I understand you correctly that you are superhumans and you have super technology and are invincible? You read such digital nonsense and want to ask the question, with whom and when did the United States actually fight, that the opponent was an equal, and not defenseless natives? where and when ? even if the United States entered the Second World War only when the USSR defeated all the German divisions on the eastern front... you have become so impudent that you are already starting to rewrite history

@TRUCKTUBEGAME

Ай бұрын

Of course it is. Ukraine is waiting for the F-16.

@GKkingg

Ай бұрын

Yes and NATO countries actually have functioning air forces unlike russias where it is just good on paper but as shown clearly not useful

@honkhonk8009

Ай бұрын

@@TRUCKTUBEGAME F16s are much different than Abrams's or Bradleys. Consider them like a gun, while the maintenance crews and support elements are the soldier carrying the gun. Its useless to deploy a gun without the soldier. It would very expensive.

@herbertsattelmeier2941

Ай бұрын

THe different ist the russian have a much better air defence like the afghans, iraqis etc or other farmers with AKs. The russians are waiting for the F-16 too. Dude in a real conventional war there is no 24/7 air support on a frontline hundreds of km long.

TOW is a wire guided missile, you have to keep the sights on the target till it's hit.

@egoru3844

Ай бұрын

Ukraine does not have enough TOW. USA forgot to send it to them.

If you are in a BMP-3, and you hit an AT mine, you would become Yuri Gagarin.

@user-uk3bu8sq4m

Ай бұрын

Если по тебе попадёт 100 мм снаряд от бмп 3 ты тоже можешь стать Нилом Армстронгом

@Alexey1979able

Ай бұрын

@@user-uk3bu8sq4m Если по тебе попадёт 25 мм снаряд бредли, из тебя получится хороший скворечник.

@VGr-pv5jk

Ай бұрын

Если получишь ПТУР от брендли то ты тоже станешь космонавт​@@user-uk3bu8sq4m

@user-of3ks7rj8c

Ай бұрын

​@@Alexey1979ableпо т90 почто полста 25 мм снарядов прилетело?! Итог экипаж эвакуировался а танк пришлось добивать. Что то Брэдли то не помогли в наступлении 2023 г. И в Авдеевке и в штурме Бахмута и сейчас с востока одно отступление ВСУ Бредли сосут как и всу

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

@@Alexey1979able третья бэха имеет шансы пережить если они идут лом. Там много сантиметров аллюминиевого сплава.

OMG dude. It's Bradley's graveyard in the first minute of your video. 2 Bradleys lost and all the troops moved to the third one.

@antonyvo4president

Ай бұрын

did that bradley disable the other bradley?

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

@@antonyvo4president нет. Это один русский танк уничтожил их всех. Неудобная правда ))) которую спикер не расскажет, как и ряд фактов которые он исказил.

@pedrowalter633

Ай бұрын

@berkut87 "All the troops survived, and that's what matter".

@TacticalStrike-Happe

Ай бұрын

@@pedrowalter633 how did you know about "All the troops survived"?

@pedrowalter633

Ай бұрын

@@TacticalStrike-Happe it is literally said on the video??

Regardless of who you’re rooting for, I’m sorry for the families of the fallen. They were mostly just men like us. 1 day you’re playing your favourite game or chilling with your girl, next day you drive over a land mine. People forget how terrible this stuff really is

Its "Steel" not "Steal" lol

@war_my

Ай бұрын

Thank you for noticing

@chrissmith2114

Ай бұрын

99.99% of people watching this video noticed that and decided not to comment.... You really need to get out more.

@w.reidripley1968

Ай бұрын

​@@mmmfd679And how's the weather in Sankt-Piterburg in springtime? Here's your 15 rubles' pay and your 🥔.

@mmmfd679

Ай бұрын

@@w.reidripley1968 You don’t want to know the truth, do you like being misinformed? What does 15 rubles have to do with it?

@worldoftancraft

Ай бұрын

@@chrissmith2114 literally the doomsday bringer's mindset. Why notice something's wrong somewhere? No need! Djust een-joy! Gou out moar!

imagine having to run in front of a bradley to bug out. nerves of steel

The TOW on the Bradley takes time to setup and it has a minimum arming distance. There were also lots of obstructions in between so perhaps the gunner didn't think it was a good idea to try to use it. Or they just didn't have any left.

@petroduzinkevych2604

Ай бұрын

I watched an interview with the gunner of this Bradley, who destroyed the Russian T-90. He said that Bradley was to much quickly moving, so he couldn't use TOW. To do this, it was necessary to stop or slowly. And it was too dangerous. I don't know if it would be correct to attach a link to this video.

I knew the Bradley was a beast before this war but seeing it in action against a peer adversary has been truly eye opening. What a beautiful machine. Comparing it against the tin can Soviet AFVs and seeing how they save the lives of crew and passengers is awe-inspiring.

@honkhonk8009

Ай бұрын

Its like seeing the burnt out Abrams's. Litterally immaculate on the inside, while the outside looks like it got hit with a MOAB.

@alexmerkulov553

Ай бұрын

​@@honkhonk8009поплавок

Ironic this war is the ideal place to test war material and compare it to the not soo mighty USSR gear

@user89554

Ай бұрын

Да и у вас я смотрю не очень хорошо с техникой,все ваши хвалёные танки горят так же как и советские,так что не надо тут лепить превосходство западного оружия , ещё увидим как самолёты будут падать ваши

@CivRichieP

Ай бұрын

This right here. Its beta testing for the coming world war. Russia threw its least affective assets at Ukraine to both downsize their trash forces/use up outdated old war era soviet equipment and we gave Ukraine basic west tech to fight as a proxy and Russia's old tech and weekend warriors/ conscripted prisoners have been slaughtered. This doesn't show us what 5th gen technology against 5th gen technology will look like outside of wargames, but it does give us an idea of how effective drones will be in the coming wars.

@xelzing02

Ай бұрын

Там от СССР осталось только 7 % остальное современное вооружение

@vik7368

Ай бұрын

Ussr hasn't been a thing for more than 30 years

@thehigherman9918

Ай бұрын

@@vik7368 majority of Russian gear has been designed/produced during the USSR times though

the Bradley gunner on the 5:00 mark said he learn to it the gap from the turret and the body on a video game

@RichardTaylor1630

Ай бұрын

"....he LEARNED to HIT the gap BETWEEN the turret and the body...."

@fludblud

Ай бұрын

War Thunder strikes again

@uqs57bju

Ай бұрын

@@RichardTaylor1630 He learned that it was a weak spot and he should aim for it. It really shouldn't be this hard for you to understand what he meant.

And these are our old ones. Much newer models with much better packages and protection

bradly is just cutting the russian grass:P

Losses of all types of equipment is to be expected. This is war after all

@timk.3286

Ай бұрын

100% but i am hearing those Bradleys have been piling up the numbers, taking down 2-3 Russians tanks at a time, making Russian AFVs look like swiss cheese and when the Bradley is hit or destroyed. The crew survives and hopes in another

@christianblevins3802

Ай бұрын

@@timk.3286 Yeah and the longer a Bradley crew survives the more experienced they become.

@sujitbala1492

Ай бұрын

I wonder why you dont make fun of the Ukrainians considering how much hate the Russians get for their losses.

@aybrowtf

Ай бұрын

@@timk.3286 a Bradley taking down 2-3 russian tanks at a time? Propaganda has brainwashed you and pulled you away from reality

@christianblevins3802

Ай бұрын

@@sujitbala1492 ? Russians don't get hate for their losses they get laughed at maybe or they might get some pity as they attack the same place for the 10th time with the same vehicles with the same results.

The 30mm cannon is very effective if used repeatedly, even to hit tanks

@PlymouthVT

Ай бұрын

25 MM.

@opdaishinkan582

Ай бұрын

@@PlymouthVT 25?

@harentrois

Ай бұрын

@@opdaishinkan582 Yes, it's a 25mm cannon

@PlymouthVT

Ай бұрын

@@opdaishinkan582 25 MM Bushmaster

@axlsane427

Ай бұрын

@@PlymouthVTMillimeter is mm

Thank you for that!! War sure has changed. And practically overnight. I never saw the spectacular affectivness of drone warfare to this degree coming. Man oh man !!

@redhad513

Ай бұрын

Not to this degree

Great video, Thanks

Misinformation at 1:55. The photograph (flipped across y-axis) is from the Russian crossing of the Siverskyi Donets river near Bilohorivka, from 5th - 10th May 2022. It's very well documented as part of the Battle of Siverskyi Donets. What is pictured is soviet-made tanks and armoured vehicles of the Russian Ground Forces' 74th Separate Guards Motorised Rifle Brigade. Bradley was announced for transfer from USA to Ukraine on 5th January 2023. First photos emerged of Bradley in Ukrainian service in April 2023.

@Anti_Everything

Ай бұрын

Почему БМП выглядят ка бредли, а танки как леопарды?

@vladgoodman5215

Ай бұрын

@@Anti_Everything а ты таблетки выпей

@Anti_Everything

Ай бұрын

@@vladgoodman5215 🤡

@uqs57bju

Ай бұрын

@@Anti_Everything Do a reverse image search. You are absolutely wrong on this. When you look at it from a better angle, higher resolution and without all the obstructing overlay. You can see that several of the tanks are missing their turrets. We all know who has tanks that lose the turret. Absolutely non of the tanks looks like leopards or Bradleys. The only clown here is you.

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

думать головой - невыполнимая задача при просмотре хвалебных видео )) это удел избранных.

I was a Bradley mechanic for 15 yrs. It's a beast that is reliable and kicks lots of ass. Compared to the Russian cold war trash the Ukrainians had before. The Bradley is a spaceship on treds lol.

@evgeniy9941

Ай бұрын

Ваш бредли слабо пригоден к ремонту в полевых условиях только заводы их ремонтируют а советские и российские БМП спокойно ремонтируются силами экипажа, а надёжность и боевая мощь намного выше, и не надо забывать, ваша техника рассчитана для боёв в местностях с твердым грунтом, а наша рассчитана в местностях со слабо несушем грунте. Что зима и распутица на Украине показала бредли еле ползала по грязи!

@MsWed1

Ай бұрын

Бредли обосрались в прошлом году в наступлении ))) горят от дешёвого китайского дрона. американская техника не выдерживает и трёх дней интенсивного боя. и часто просто ломается по дороге на фронт

@EBAL_VASH_POT

Ай бұрын

Ну че там бредли и абрамсы смогли талибов победить?

@A.Byrjak

Ай бұрын

Бажаєм міцного здоров'я . Бредлі може в борт пробити Т 90 , як в данній ситуації , якщо стріляв би бронебійними снарядами ? We wish you good health. Can Bradley penetrate the side of the T 90 if he were to shoot armor-piercing projectiles?

@elfyserascer3735

Ай бұрын

@@A.Byrjak нет, не может. Калибр не тот.

We need all people to live in Peace.

@derekheuring2984

Ай бұрын

Yes, but as long as there are Russians and Moslems in the world peace is impossible.

@saxegothaea_conspicua

Ай бұрын

we need the US to sell bradly

@alexmerkulov553

Ай бұрын

​@@saxegothaea_conspicuaгойду?😂

@chipsawdust5816

Ай бұрын

It's too small a town with lousy infrastructure.

то есть, автор на 9:16 показывает танк с крестом на башне, который стоит на "дороге смерти" и говорит, что это российская техника. ну-ну

@vasylrybak9099

Ай бұрын

Там не крест

@tsuaa

Ай бұрын

не парься. всё па плану, патерь нет

@user-kv2ji9lt6p

Ай бұрын

@@tsuaa повторяй перед сном по три раза для самоуспокоения)

@alexmerkulov553

Ай бұрын

​@@user-kv2ji9lt6pза 3 дня)😂

@Vladimir-xb7ps

Ай бұрын

​@@tsuaaну если сравнивать с Украиной, то можно сказать и нет... Сейчас потери в принципе как минимум вдвое , а то и втрое меньше, так как теперь сначала выжигают артиллерией или авиабомбами позиции ВСУ, а затем их с минимальными потерями зачищают ... Украинцев конечно сейчас гибнет намного больше...

Bradley хороша машина!

@user-qy3kj7im7n

Ай бұрын

только горишь в ней заживо от любого дрона

@user-zi2ci5cp1m

Ай бұрын

@@user-qy3kj7im7n ти відос то глянь...

@torua

Ай бұрын

@@user-qy3kj7im7n в бмп, но не в бредлі.

@stsmotritel7993

Ай бұрын

​@@user-qy3kj7im7n много сгорело фашистских оккупантов - путлеровцев

@totenkopf9272

Ай бұрын

@@torua Полно видео с горящими Бредли, не неси чушь. Всё горит и подбивается.

I love how people complain about the evils of our Military Industrial Complex all the time and take our military gear, which is top notch and light years beyond most for granted.

@user-ml4kd7lb9r

Ай бұрын

особенно лапти

@olyokie

Ай бұрын

That term was coined by Republican President Eisenhower, who also had been the commander of all Allied Troops in Europe during WW2. He felt this fn complex posed a great enough threat that he included this warning, and terminology, in his farewell speech as President. Now You Know

@marcblank3036

Ай бұрын

Greed and corruption are always threat​s to society. Certainly these risks are present in the US with lobby groups and over expensive equipment and programs@@olyokie

@jackwalker9492

Ай бұрын

@@olyokie I actually knew that since about 40 years ago hero.

@Mason_51

Ай бұрын

Это какое оружие? Абрамс, леопард или м 16

Abrams are also cool, as we were told, but for some reason they were removed from the battle line

Ukraine shall protect his motherland and sovereignty ❤

@MrFalkonvd

Ай бұрын

Нельзя защищать то чего нет и никогда небыло😂

@nexusdominos670

16 күн бұрын

Ukraine used to have sovereignty in 91-2014. After 2014 it is owned by USA. Now Russia brings sovereignty back to Ukraininan brothers.

>Bradley >King of the battlefield lmao

@yuliymateychev4923

Ай бұрын

Bradley is king and Ukraine is losing. Russia is at war with all NATO states on the territory of Ukraine and is winning. Doesn't that tell you that you don't know what the truth is?

@texasforever7887

Ай бұрын

@@yuliymateychev4923 If Russia was at war with NATO it would be over in a week. Russia who has 3 times the population invaded Ukraine and should have steamrolled them in under a week. Instead its 2 years later and they are stile banging their heads against a wall. Doesn't that tell you that you don't know what the truth is? Ukraine is not a NATO country. They are using superior NATO equipment but there are no NATO troops on the front line.

@yuliymateychev4923

Ай бұрын

@@texasforever7887 You really do not know what is the reason for this military operation. I don't want to offend you. You get information solely and only from your media which presents a convenient version for your government. Russia never wanted to destroy Ukraine in 1 weeks as you say! Russia entered the territory of two regions that determined themselves through a referendum as independent states and then rejoined the territory of Russia. This happened because Ukraine for 10 years killed the population of these areas, shot at its own citizens, who were more Russian than Ukrainian. For 10 years, Ukraine terrorized the population of these territories under the command of Western instructors (NATO generals). The war in Ukraine is a well-designed conflict by the Western countries that was intended to break and destroy Russia economically and militarily. I cannot explain to you in 5 sentences everything that happened there in the last 20-30 years. If you want to know what is happening there, watch the interviews of Scott Ritter and Tucker Carlson.

@user-lh5pj8rf2q

Ай бұрын

​@@texasforever7887 Rather, NATO would have continued to bang against the wall for the second year, demanding puppet soldiers and money for war from countries around the world. The population of NATO countries would watch as another military base in France or Germany exploded and their sons returned home in coffins from the front lines. You've seen enough movies and videos of war against people wearing sneakers. Russia has the best air defenses and NATO aircraft would not be able to operate as effectively, often falling dozens a week. And the war would last for decades. And yes, the same thing could have happened in Russia, as it was very difficult for both sides. But if the United States were excluded from NATO, everything would change, with new words about readiness for a long war when Russia would destroy your rear.Russia defeated the Ukrainian army in 3 months, and without NATO, it would have likely capitulated. Now, Ukrainians are sacrificing themselves so that Western officials and corporations can profit by supplying weapons at the expense of ordinary citizens' taxes. The people of Donbass wanted democracy, not a coup in Ukraine. They wanted freedom, but the criminal totalitarian government decided to kill them for wanting the legitimate president back.

It`s kinda dumb to compare real life with games but I choosed the Bradley way over any Tank @ movability and power @ 2 Anti-Tank Rockets. It`s allways the beast in any game.

@barryfrancis7421

Ай бұрын

Chose.

@user-jq7tc7qi5z

Ай бұрын

USA turns any armed conflict into a Duck Hunt game, but 100 Bradleys are not enouph to win this war.

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

в любой, кроме реального поля боя.

@user-jq7tc7qi5z

Ай бұрын

@@8Celestial кроме реального поля боя, пока туда не приехал Брэдли. ясно что ты пишешь "от балды"

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

@@user-jq7tc7qi5z тыкайте близким. Ваша вера - зыбкая почва. Готовьтесь к разочарованию.

The Bradley has the beast mode sounding chain gun from its bushmaster and it turns the t90 tank into Swiss cheese

*Слава бойцам ВСУ!* 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

in fact, these units of equipment that we received are in terrible technical condition. The guys have a month to prepare them to the proper technical condition!

The Bradley is an IFV, rather than an APC. An infantry fighting vehicle (IFV), also known as a mechanized infantry combat vehicle (MICV), is a type of armoured fighting vehicle used to carry infantry into battle and provide direct-fire support.The 1990 Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe defines an infantry fighting vehicle as "an armoured combat vehicle which is designed and equipped primarily to transport a combat infantry squad, and which is armed with an integral or organic cannon of at least 20 millimeters calibre and sometimes an antitank missile launcher". IFVs often serve both as the principal weapons system and as the mode of transport for a mechanized infantry unit. Infantry fighting vehicles are distinct from armored personnel carriers (APCs), which are transport vehicles armed only for self-defense and not specifically engineered to fight on their own.[1] IFVs are designed to be more mobile than tanks and are equipped with a rapid-firing autocannon or a large conventional gun; they may include side ports for infantrymen to fire their personal weapons while on board.

We designed it for transportation and back up for ground troops.its not a tank killer,BUTTT?

Saw a bradley yesterday in Moscow, but there is a nuance

@magicmarc2733

Ай бұрын

I wonder how many Russians had to die before it was there.

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

местным "зрителям" не понять. С диванов не видно ))

@80sabotajnik

Ай бұрын

На дне черного моря можешь поплавать с аквалангом и увидишь там Москву, но есть нюанс ))))

@hcm6501

Ай бұрын

@@80sabotajnik надо будет когда-нибудь, но для начала вынесем ваше недогосударство, мой ты бывший согражданин.

@80sabotajnik

Ай бұрын

@@hcm6501 кхе кхе )))

1:47 you spelled steel wrong...unless you wanted to steal the armor...LOL

FYI, “Soviet vehicles” were last made in 1986.

The round hit the ground and did a mobility kill. Notice the track blown apart on the right. Also the explosion is far forward and low

in Russian, this is called "pissing in the ears")))

@BADOZzz

Ай бұрын

Точно🤝

@user-kp3fs6co2g

Ай бұрын

They need to sell this shit to the Europeans. To do this, they need good advertising, not the truth from the battlefield.

@alexmerkulov553

Ай бұрын

​за 3 бобы ссать в уши бибе.дня) гойде!за 3 орка!​@@BADOZzzдня)😂

@alexmerkulov553

Ай бұрын

3 дня ! 3 дня! я биба как слышно приём?😂

@BADOZzz

Ай бұрын

@@alexmerkulov553 отца сити

Бредли хорошая машина, но там где они очень нужны, их мало. Но зато Бредли много на базах хранения законсервированной техники. Видно политики считают, что на этих базах хранения Бредли, да и другая техника, нужнее, чем на поле боя, на стороне истекающего кровью союзника.

@Alex-vb1fp

Ай бұрын

Машина Брэдли неоднозначнаяя по своим хаактеристикам. Но пушка у нее просто супер.

@rusnya3668

Ай бұрын

@@Alex-vb1fp Как минимум она есть, и она спасает пехоту. Нужно больше этих коробков.

@user-kc2gb3ov1d

Ай бұрын

​@@Alex-vb1fpЗнакомые в восторге от неё.Все однозначно,надо больше.

@user-qy3kj7im7n

Ай бұрын

В ней гореть заживо от любой питарды никто не хочет

@leto2582

Ай бұрын

@@user-kc2gb3ov1dтак возьмите и создайте а я забыл Украина ничего своего создать не может 😂

where is the full video link ? you said it was i nthe description

Every settlement mentioned in this video is already under Russian control. Just something to think about

@dancinghudson707

Ай бұрын

😅

Kakvi zapadni kenjatori😅Bredli je obična kanta

Is steal a top secret type of steel?

dude great breakdowns and addition of contextual footage!! best ive seen!

Slava Ukrayina🇺🇦🙏❤️🇫🇮

@user-lt4mb5zz4x

Ай бұрын

Слава России!

@alexp2179

Ай бұрын

@@user-lt4mb5zz4x ха ха, руzкие копируют на свой манер, от зависти и бессилия. В чем слава то у неофашистов россии? Самим не стыдно?

@djalikysdjalikys5338

Ай бұрын

Соссии

@jankwartel1860

Ай бұрын

​@@user-lt4mb5zz4xRUCK FUSSIA 🤢🤮

@jankwartel1860

Ай бұрын

​@@user-lt4mb5zz4xRUCK FUSSIA 🤢🤮

SR: BRADLEY!

Bradley got good publicity in this war epic battle was VS T-90m

The Bradley's ammunition is like the lasers in star wars so majestic

Great Footage !! Just horrific as we watch this loss of human life n equipment !!All this Loss for one man Greed n Desire for power !! Pray both countries can have peace soon !! 😎

@Shustrik1

Ай бұрын

Russia is not fighting there, but is conducting a special military operation. The United States is fighting there, with the hands of Ukrainians, through Europe. Russia could have taken over Ukraine a long time ago, but this makes neither economic nor geopolitical sense. Europe needs to get tired, then it will make sense. Under this regime, Russia can fight forever, without the slightest damage to its economy and even with a certain growth. If you are from the USA, then your well-fed life is coming to an end. A few more years and the dollar will become a paper dollar for the world, and then another life awaits you.

@user-nm1gj4qn6w

Ай бұрын

Жадности Зеленского. Ему уже 60 миллирдов долларов подгоняют.

@jamessouza7065

Ай бұрын

Decent chance this never happens if one particular military alliance that was formed in the event should war begin against the Soviet Union and the eastern European states comprising the Warsaw pact. In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed. Nato on the other hand as with many things that begin with the very best of intentions has since increased its member Nation status and has expanded considerably. Russia views this expansion Nato's coming towards its border closer and closer as a direct threat to its security and Ukraine currently borders Russia.Several treaties to which it was agreed that Nato would *NOT* encroach towards Russia. NATO HAS INDEED DONE EXACTLY THAT. THE NOTION OF PUTIN BEING HELLBENT ON REFORMING THE WARSAW PACT TERRITORIES UNDER RUSSIAN CONTROL IS POSSIBLE OF COURSE YES BUT IS IT THE TRUTH? NOT REALLY? NOT ANY MORE TRUE THAN ME CLAIMING PRESIDENT biden also works every Monday Wednesday & Friday for a local district of Columbia roofing company & usually is used as a (shingle hustler) being obviously strong & explosive and ridiculously physically powerfull, biden carries the bundles of asphalt shingles up an extension ladder 4 bundles at a time (two on each shoulder.)... I can bullshit too doesn't mean it's true though?.

I gotta get me some of that steal armor.

@w.reidripley1968

Ай бұрын

The Russkis will call you bad names for doing that...

@jamessouza7065

Ай бұрын

You can make it at home with some yogurt and tin foil!

They wouldn't fire the TOW because they were already engaged close in, no point sitting still to fire it when it would likely be under it's minimum range. Even if that wasn't the case, there's the other consideration. Cost of a TOW (that's also hard to get for them) versus the cost of some 25mm rounds. The best choice was what they did, one keeps it's attention and strips it's sensors, tracks, etc. While the other gets behind it and brutally shoves AP rounds up the back into the thin armor. Not sure if they had depleted uranium AP rounds or not, but either way. They nailed the T90 encounter for the situation

I used to work on the TOW Missile System on the BFV when I was in the Army. Best job I ever had.

This scrap metal Bradley always burns better than firewood

@mr.movchan

Ай бұрын

But a little bit worse than APC and T-90

@ArgelTal_

Ай бұрын

Well it is true that the bradley shell does not function as good of a grill as the bmp. But its easier repaired and people inside even survive the fire.

- How biased do you want to be and how much cherrypicking do you want to do for this video? - Absolutely

@TheElMuffin

Ай бұрын

Aye, I would just like an objective assessment, both sides aren't super clear about their actual successes and losses

I remember a movie in the 90's that tried to trash on the Bradley. Once again displaying how Hollywood has NO understanding of reality. Slava Ukraini and glory to heroes!

@jamessouza7065

Ай бұрын

"The pentagon wars" Alot of the things in the movie were accurate there were a few things that were "fixed" so as to present a better protected vehicle. It's actually pretty funny and is somewhat representative of what really took place but is by no means a documentary that places a premium on fact and accuracy. What does really?

@devereuxbirdzell

Ай бұрын

@@jamessouza7065 That's it! Well if it helped to improve it than I supposed that's pretty cool. I do remember it being pretty funny.

It is worth noting that the speed of sound in Ukraine seems to be the same speed as the speed of light?

@8Celestial

Ай бұрын

в их учебниках много интересных "фактов" об Украине ))

Какая на*ер ловушка? Вся страна в ловушке. 😂

Over a third of the 186 Bradleys that were supplied have either been destroyed, damaged, abandoned or captured.

4:57 In an interview, the operators of the Bradley said, that they were running low on ammo and knew, that the T-90 would be a tough challenge for the 25mm. So the gunner deliberately went for the optics and other sensors to try and blind the Russians in the tank.

Каждый раз одно и тоже, кто то объявляет России войну, после чего к ней прибавляются новые территории. Желаю всем европейцам увидеть эти кадры выглянув в окно своего дома.

@unoforteable

Ай бұрын

Вы угрофины ж трлько прошлым летом марши на Москву устраивали) и еще не вечер)

@MrSerg186i

Ай бұрын

@@unoforteable ну как бы в отличие вас потомков турок и хазар фины как бы в семье европейских народов ;)

@vladod.6220

Ай бұрын

А ни кто войны не объявлял, россия её начала без объявления. Да за 100 лет раша только потеряла территории, так и надо завоевателям.

Awesome bit of kit Bradley's probably in use more than tanks carrying troops , I wouldn't of thought it could get through the frontal armour of a tank unless it hit a technical joint

But why does it seem that the Ukrainians are having trouble adapting to the M1 Abrams🤔😒?

🇧🇷🇺🇲🇬🇧🇪🇺Força pros Heróis da Ucrânia 🇺🇦 Pelo menos aqui nesse canal nos sabemos quem é quem no campo de batalha

Maybe they did not use TOW because this module did not delivered from US? Or did not delivered in sufficient quantity?

Driving with the flank exposed??

одни и те же видосы несколько месяцев показывают, немного разбавляя чем-то новым или ещё старее...

¡felicitaciones! SLAVA UKRAINIA FOREVER!!! al menos el mensaje llega al Cáucaso.🙄😔🤔🙂👍 y un pokitirris más lejitos, gracias ,saludos desde Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas Mexico. ☮♾🛡🏁

@harryrodjes8811

Ай бұрын

Gloria gloria... Gritando emigrante mexicano en la frontera con Estados Unidos 🤣

@user-el7xm9yf4h

Ай бұрын

@@harryrodjes8811 ¡al menos! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Bradley is not APC, but IFV...

Thanks for your support

Молодец,подбил своих,наш человек

@isenbull2242

Ай бұрын

Да, рабсияне они такие - чуть что и "френдли фаер"😁🔥👍

@user-kc2gb3ov1d

Ай бұрын

Ты орк,не наш.

@user-kc2gb3ov1d

Ай бұрын

Ты орк,не наш.

BEAUTIFUL

You will be a driver, you okay with that? "What type sir?" APC soldier💀

It is interesting what the situation would be if the Russians had thought of using the t-14 armata

Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦 ❤❤

@egorsan1195

Ай бұрын

Хероям в срало

Most of lost Tanks seen on Video are actually Ukrainians, not Russians.

As a former Bradley driver, gunner and commander with experience in the Iraq war. This vehicle made living in a war zone survivable and gave us all confidence in our abilities. The Bradley has two types of 25mm ammunition. An HE (high explosive) round and a sabot (armor piercing) round. There is also a 7.62 mm machine gun that shoots faster (more rounds per minute) than your portable M249. Then there's the TOW. The TOW takes a moment to raise the launcher and theres only two loaded at a time which are more expensive and could easily be in short supply. They are effective but aren't used as often as the 25mm gun, so gunners are more comfortable with the 25mm. I wouldve liked to help train the Ukrainians when they received the Bradleys but by now, their skills have exceeded mine. Best of luck to Ukraine 🇺🇦

Присылайте ещё, раз они такие непобедимые, с нетерпением ждём. У нас много парков, где можно выставлять на обозрение горелые остовы вашего металлолома.

This footage is NOT from Chasiv Yar, stop posting misinformation.

@nirvanalama8493

Ай бұрын

American propaganda channel here. What do you expect.

@jaywild2531

Ай бұрын

Ukraine is losing and losing US tax dollars. Wait for the debt department to come and collect, not going to be nice.

@ShotPanz438

Ай бұрын

@@nirvanalama8493 Don't forget there are also Russian propaganda channels aswell It's hard to find a a real channel that doesnt side with no one and only sharing the news

@101-cesaraugusto7

Ай бұрын

I like history legends on YT, but your best bet is just seeing telegram channels for combat footage and the advance (or retreat) of the front line.​ Regardless, its fun to see how blatant propaganda, such as this video, is presented.@ShotPanz438

so where did these tanks go?

3:05 because Bradley can instantly switch to other belt, with APs for example..

these videos are all available free on telegram. Nice compilation and narration in this video

Big shit, the Russians continue to advance and the Ukrainians continue to retreat, this proves that these Bradleys made no difference on the battlefield.

@Space_Muffin45

Ай бұрын

advance by a village a month?

@dancinghudson707

Ай бұрын

​@@Space_Muffin45it's better than retreating

@Space_Muffin45

Ай бұрын

@@dancinghudson707 thats kinda funny because they are currently retreating from their breachheads of the donetsk front

@kevinmcinerney1959

Ай бұрын

The Russians took some ground and that "proves" that the Bradleys made "no difference". I don't think you know what "proves" means. So for instance if someone said "The Germans lost WW2 and that proves their soldiers were terrible" that would be nonsense.

@joecola6415

Ай бұрын

​@@dancinghudson707so losing tens of thousands of soldiers and countless pieces of armor including tanks, infantry fighting vehicles etc. just to take one flattened village in a symbolic victory that provides zero tactical advantage is better than giving up ground to save those soldiers/armor/weapons systems?