There's No Thinking Without Love | Byung-Chul Han and The Agony of Eros
Byung-Chul Han claims that love is the condition of possibility for thought itself. Dr Davood Gozli (@DavoodGozli) and I discuss the relationship between eros and thinking.
Watch the full podcast here: • Why You Should Read By...
---------------------------------------
{Podcast}
Substack: rsampod.substack.com/
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4ryEqju...
Anchor: anchor.fm/rahul-samaranayake
Available on other platforms at link.chtbl.com/PDBAf9Zd
{Website}
rahulsam.me/
{Social Media}
/ name_is_rahul
substack.com/@trsam/
x.com/trsam97
/ rahul-samaranayake-981...
{Reference Links}
/ the-agony-of-eros
---------------------------------------
If the ideas I discuss in this channel evoke your interest, consider visiting theunhappyman.substack.com/
---------------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing.
If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of the related material, please email me at trahulsam@gmail.com, and we can sort it out. Thank you.
Пікірлер: 4
Really good. Greetings from BR.
@RahulSam
7 күн бұрын
Many thanks, my friend!
hello sam i have question from you regarding zizek . did zizek accept the idea of innatism .that we have limit of our understanding and innate genetic capicity for example as human embroyo cannot grow as same chicken wings.meaning we have mysteries and problems . for example free will for human falls in mysteries not problem.did zizek accept or reject chomsky these ideas.
@RahulSam
26 күн бұрын
Hey mate, Žižek is a materialist, but he’d argue that the way a Chomskyian postulates the so-called natural essence of human beings itself comes from a subjective point of view. What do you think?