There’s a reason why Russia’s defense companies got no sales at the Dubai Air Show Exhibition, and that’s because we’ve all seen in Ukraine that they don’t work like Russia has promised. On the other hand, US defense company raked in billions in sales.

@doug8515

6 ай бұрын

Are you drunk lol? Grow up ffs

@christophggcyrus6861

6 ай бұрын

Yes - because we all see how good the US weapons work ……

@Maxfr8

6 ай бұрын

Russia builds junk, if they build anything at all. 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇸

@Thetequilashooter1

6 ай бұрын

@@christophggcyrus6861 They do work. HIMARS has wreaked havoc on Russia’s military. Just two ATACMS have decimated numerous Russian helicopters at an airfield. Patriot missiles have intercepted Russia’s Kinzhal missile six times. US Javelins have repeatedly taken out Russian tanks. The Bradley Fighting Vehicle is not only slaughtering Russian troops, but its kept Ukrainian troops alive when its been attacked. The US has provided Ukraine with less than two percent of its military budget, and yet look at how much of the Russian military has been annihilated by it. On the other hand, what has Russia’s military done that is impressive? The only thing Russia has shown is that it can send scores of soldiers to their needless deaths.

@everypitchcounts4875

6 ай бұрын

Did you see China debut its version of a Chinook at the show

At last! 13 years later we have some detail of this amazing endeavour! I still remember when this was news back at 2010. Thank you!

@mrhassell

6 ай бұрын

February 24, 1949 was the first hypersonic weapon test, in the USA. Where you at with 13 years?

@Viracocha711

6 ай бұрын

when have we EVER tested a tech for its feasibility & then said COOL it can be done & then put it on the shelf & walk away???🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣The WAVE RIDER could surfin in the South China Sea soon if Xi gets too Froggy! BTW-You're 100% correct about this tech basically being 13yrs old despite what so many others are saying. They're mistaking the reentry vehicles or warhead of a ballistic missiles or ICBM both of which can & do reach mach 5 & above but their trajectories are set...Thats not the case with these new TRUE Hypersonic Missiles & especially the WAVE RIDER which can not far exceed mach 5 but turn & change its course making it basically impossible to defend against or shoot down, anyway.

@Viracocha711

6 ай бұрын

OH Yeah...Nice Avatar!!!😯😯😉😉👍👍

@Michael_Michaels

6 ай бұрын

@@Viracocha711 thank you.

@audas

6 ай бұрын

@@mrhassell False.

Wow! I worked on a Ramjet missile very similar to this one but slower, wind tunnel and everything back in 1989. Great to see the idea not dead after all.👍

@setituptoblowitup

6 ай бұрын

🏄‍♂️🇺🇲🗽⚖️🤙

@Jermo7899

5 ай бұрын

This will always be a good idea and will be worth it when it is first used in combat. The U.S. doesn’t have to retrofit an existing cruise missile add a booster and call it hypersonic. The U.S. hypersonic will be a REAL Hypersonic with a real scramjet engine

@thedanktankdriver00

3 ай бұрын

I’ve Hurd that the sr71 we’ll traveling at max speed at it’s altitude the engines don’t compress the air because of how compressed it is already and it just a adds the full and burns it, not exactly the same thing but wonder if the idea came from it🤷‍♂️

@pedrosura

3 ай бұрын

@@thedanktankdriver00 The floq is compressible b/c of the speed but the engine controls the location of the shock wave the takes the air from supersonic to subsonic for combustion

China: "We have Mach 5 missiles!" The US: "Cool. You're still 30 years behind."

Now this is a video Thank You.

@doug8515

6 ай бұрын

Misleading, but you're right, it is a video

@gm7304

6 ай бұрын

Kick Ass video 😃 to boot@@doug8515

Thanks so much an excellent video.....🇺🇸

Wasn't the X-43A reported to have gone mach 9.8 at 110,000 ft in 2004

@angelosasso1653

6 ай бұрын

True but the goals were slightly different. X-43A was made to show that the general concept works and that high speeds are possible while the X-51 is almost a finished product and aims at getting a longer controlled flight. It´s almost a finished hypersonic weapon and if Boeing played its cards right, they might already have some contracts for production secured...

The manned X-15 went almost Mach 7 in the 1960s.

@everypitchcounts4875

6 ай бұрын

X-43A went mach 9.8 at 110,000ft in 2004

@philonetic321

6 ай бұрын

X-15 was a man sitting on a rocket. Scramjets like the X-43/X-51 are the fastest air breathing vehicles ever made.

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

6 ай бұрын

Americans always lose to russians when it comes to the boasting war.

@TerraRubicon

6 ай бұрын

The X-15 was a much bigger platform subsequently holding more fuel. While succesfull it also suffered from airframe damage due to high friction with the air. Parts of it were starting to melt...

@lostinspace4417

6 ай бұрын

@@TerraRubicon That's fascinating! Also, it is still quite an impressive feat to happen in the '60s - despite the melting. Thanks for sharing!

Nasa and Space Force just took down something today with the new version of this!

We have had this since 1990. Imagine what we actually have now that nobody is going to know about until it’s too late.😂

@brown2889

6 ай бұрын

I think this every time I get to see some weirding tech we make. Then there is stuff they never demoed but still have in the barn. That’s why so many foreign exchange students are over here just trying to get glimpses.

@audas

6 ай бұрын

Pentagon admitted they have no hypersonic.

@Thetequilashooter1

6 ай бұрын

@@audas Try doing a little research before commenting. Even back in the 1950s the US had a hypersonic missile called the GAM-87 Skybolt. If you like Russia and China so much go use their crap copies of KZread.

@Anomize23

6 ай бұрын

Hypersonic missiles are cool until you actually see that we have lasers now they can take down those missiles quite quickly😎 so yes, missiles are about quite outdated for the US military for defense purposes. Cheaper for reusing and quite more accurate

@audas

6 ай бұрын

@@Anomize23 There is absolutely ZERO chance any US laser system could take down a hypersonic - you really have no clue how fast these things travel. Laser systems need to remain locked onto the target for around 10 seconds MINIMUM. They also need to detect the target before it arrives. Hypersonics are so fast almost no radar system can detect them and respond to them. They are horizon to horizon in under 5 seconds. Your comment is absurd on the most EXTREME level.

Hey Cold War, welcome back we missed ya

I hope we continue to develop a ground launch system, keeping America strong! 😉👍🇺🇸

The trick is to keep the structure from coming apart

Great conten!

Scramjet based “cruise missiles” will need to fly at extremely high altitudes to achieve hypersonic speed. Once they transition to ground attack, they will not be able to maintain hypersonic speed. Maneuverability at hypersonic speed entails large sweeping turns, not small, sharp movements.

@Kreistor

6 ай бұрын

There is no missile that kinks anc dodges anti-missiles. They don't have rrfebsive sensors so can't ser an incoming missile to avoid it. Itbisvtruevthat the velocity will slow in thicker air, but the momentum takes a while to reduce. By tipping up then straight down, the time in thick air is reduced, and they can still arrive at a terminal Mach 3. Your criticisms just don't apply to anything except worm missiles from anime. Real missiles reduce the risk by shortening thevdistance by flying straight and fast, by not being burdened by the weight of thevwystems you think exist.

@vanguard9067

6 ай бұрын

@@Kreistor You misunderstand, I am not saying hypersonic missile can do the things many people believe they can do, I am saying they CANNOT maintain hypersonic speeds flying level through thick atmosphere, and CANNOT make sharp maneuvers at hypersonic speed, therefore, anti-missile missiles would be able to intercept them. so if they re attacking from the (near) vertical, they will 1) take a comparatively predictable course doing so and 2) slow below hypersonic speed (Mach 3), allowing anti-missile missiles to intercept. Please read other people’s comments more carefully. And no need trying to be clever when insulting them. It tends to make you look bad.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

​@@vanguard9067Russian and Chinese hypersonics are maneuverable in terminal approach. We can't reliably intercept them at all.

@vanguard9067

6 ай бұрын

@@JamesOMalley-hb4tf please help me understand. Define maneuverable at what speed and attack orientation? Thank you.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

@@vanguard9067 that's classified but it's said they are highly maneuverable and have some type of throttle control so they can slow down if they need to make hard turns then they turn back up the throttle after they turn getting back to hypersonic top speeds.

So cool

USA been testing hypo sonic vehicles for yrs while rest day they got there’s first , we text our stuff heavily not just build it few tests an say we hypo now , we always make sure ours are ready so that when deployed they don’t fail like some

@DtheD740

6 ай бұрын

When you are running the taxpayer's money you try to keep the meter running as long as you can

@Eventual-Visitor

6 ай бұрын

That's probably why they keep failing again and again.

@MRptwrench

6 ай бұрын

I relate to your shorthand in order to confer a key point. The US doesn't rush projects. They like to make sure they'll actually work. For reference see 6 "unbeatable" hypersonic missile kills in Ukraine theater. I'd also say "see China's Long March missile", but only official CCP sources, so....bs. Hey wasn't that an "unbeatable" Russian hypersonic shot down by a Patriot system? So Many Lulz.

@doug8515

6 ай бұрын

Testing and failing, even Iran has a hyposonic missile, and their one works.

The top-secret x-51 was unexpectedly declassified when a certain president revealed the existence of a 'super-duper' missile.

Oh that Boeing project that was announced like 30 years ago and then silently disappeared. "Oh no the Russians and Chinese have hypersonics! We totally didn't secretly have them for 20 years."

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

We don't, please prove otherwise 😂

@user-jh6ik1qd7p

4 ай бұрын

@@JamesOMalley-hb4tf Yeah like the US isn't keeping this stuff in secret. They manged to create one successfully so they are fully capable of creating one.

First successful hypersonic missile, launched on February 24, 1949, with first design for a hypersonic weapon, developed by "Wernher von Braun (JPL)" during the 1930s...

It should have a self destruct in the projectile

It's impressive but considering the X-15 did mach 6.7 in 1967 have to sit back and think. Had a friend that worked both U-2's & SR's and he had some interesting stories. FLY NAVY!!!

The eye of a hurricane is surprisingly calm

Hypersonic flight can be achieved already with gravitational input like on an ICBM.

@philonetic321

6 ай бұрын

The X-51 is air breathing, works in-atmosphere, there is no re-entry phase, it can sea-skim.

@mrbaab5932

6 ай бұрын

Yes, first decades now.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

​@@philonetic321x 51 doesn't even exist dude ...😂

@philonetic321

6 ай бұрын

@@JamesOMalley-hb4tf Try to pay attention. The X-51 first flew in 2010.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

@@philonetic321 and it's been cancelled and doesn't even exist....you pay attention. 🤡

The eye of a hurricane is pretty calm.

Their no wind in the eye of a hurricane love the video

From 1964, with the publication of "The Flying Stovepipe" I was led to understand that the SCramjet would burn bure H2. So what comes after the X=51?

@ridethecurve55

6 ай бұрын

If they told us, they'd have to ...

@SpacePatrollerLaser

6 ай бұрын

@@ridethecurve55 Lemme guess; go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass "Go"....

@sibeerijachannel6828

6 ай бұрын

You forget that in 2023 Russia has rs 28 Sarmat... Minuteman are not a 2023 real modern weapon... Garbage ...

@Charlesputnam-bn9zy

6 ай бұрын

@@sibeerijachannel6828 when it comes to the boast war, Americans are no match for russians.

DARPA is about to open it's first office outside the US. It will be in Canberra, Australia and will be overseeing hyper-sonic missile tech in the outback..

@NPC-fl3gq

6 ай бұрын

Not surprised... The initial (modern, not ICBM stuff) hypersonic research was a collaborative effort between DARPA and an Australian university.

AFRL FTW! ✊

The US used a hypersonic missile to achieve history's first and only air-to-air kill on a satellite back in the 1980s. This achievement helped the US realize hypersonic missiles aren't really all they are cracked up to be, and have been focused on developing DESSL ever since. DESSL's engage targets at light speed, and do not require the complicated guidance and lead calculation systems as missiles. They can be deployed from a greater spectrum of platforms as well. Aerial platforms can potentially engage targets in both offensive and defense scenarios at greater stand off distances that aerial platforms carrying missiles of any kind. Also, DESSL's do not have to calculate vectors and lead fast moving targets such as hypersonic missiles to the extent a conventional propelled air defense artillery system does. A DESSL must only located the incoming threat and then point directly at it. Another huge advantage of DESSLs is that they are multi use. Whereas a missile can only be used once, DESSLs can be used thousands of times, if maintained correctly and can be produced at a much larger scale. One DESSL can be used to engage multiple hypersonic missiles, whereas it would require several hypersonic missiles to engage a single DESSL. DESSLs are literally the fastest kinetic weapon system in the known universe since NOTHING in the known universe moves faster than light. Several of these systems are already being installed on US naval warships, aircraft, and ground vehicles, with massive developmental research and performance enhancements in the near future. Hypersonic missile technology was more of backup plan for the US, not the priority considering virtually all missile technology will immediately be made obsolete in the face of large scale DESSL platform integration.

@ogdocvato

6 ай бұрын

How is the "blooming" problem overcome at distances > 10 mi. in the troposphere?

@i-love-space390

6 ай бұрын

For all the cool advantages the Directed Energy Weapons have, distance, scattering, water vapor, weather, are all their enemies. Also the amount of time on target in order to burn through the airfame is critical unless multi-megawatt power levels are achieved. The ocean is the most difficult environment for any weapon system, and lasers have the same or worse difficulties than mechanical systems. Maybe Tesla's idea of sending tiny kinetic particles at a distance has some merit, but unfortunately the huge surface area to volume ratio of tiny particles would make them decelerate very fast. Tesla was clever, but he often overlooked very practical problems with his paper designs. The discipline of having to make something work in the real world is much more difficult than creating them in your mind.

@getinthespace7715

6 ай бұрын

Problem with lasers is smoke, water vapor, etc. are very low tech, and cheap methods to disperse that energy and defeat them.

@cruise_missile8387

6 ай бұрын

I don't see them being used very often, what's the limiting factor right now? Power consumption?

@MarkLandrebe-ef5yd

6 ай бұрын

@spec... DESSL (??)

Making this technology publicly known is the best strategy against any enemy: "Don't make us use this against you ... because we can ... and you can do nothing about it!"

I better not see any alien invasions in my lifetime when you have all these countries flashing their toys😂

Thanks, Dark Tech.

witnessed a test of a anti satellite missile some 10=15 years ago. Took about 2 seconds from launch to interception! Had several friends that witnessed this event during the perseids!

lols, and this is what is publicly available xD so cool!

"Guarantees Unmatched Destruction"? Please explain!

Only missing is the "Dz" mod upgrade and it will be unstoppable....👍😎

Because if you know anything about scramjet engines they have a two-stage process not only allowing them for supersonic travel but for in and out of atmosphere travel..

300 million bucks for 9 minutes of data......well if you say so.

Getting better and better. The best will be in service soon.

So where is the technology now ? This says the last test was run in 2013. That was 10 years ago. Do you have any updates ?

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

Cancelled like all the others 😂

Least of all Elon and NASA's focusing on the right thing which is economy it'll always be economy because if you can afford to go up and down multiple times versus the other guy which can only go up and down once it's a no-brainer

The terms of Ram jets and Scram jets are not interchangeable, as they are two similar but separate engine types

I've noticed that Yanks seem to get extremely agitated and defensive when anyone talks about hypersonics - they start yelling and screaming about how the USA already had the technology in the 80s; that they've already perfected STar wars style rayguns; they have technology "that noone even knows about yet" and on and on and on. Just like clockwork on these boards.

Recommission the sr-71 for r+d on unstart causes, symptoms, and work around data.

How old is this film?

Has anyone heard of the Mutant Morphing Missile. That thing seems evil. It can actually bend and change its shape during flight to chase down its target

We all knew they had fun toys in the works :) Go team blue!!

Gotta ride that wave 🏄🚀 Am i that stoned or did i hear you say its capable of mach 20... like oeh my gawd

This points to rapid development and learning quickly the issues as we have seen with that big candle Mr Elon 2us lit up a couple days ago. I'm a jeeper with many, long time and our moto is BUILD BREAK REPEAT. After awhile you don't break just keep up maintenance

so it is missile with atom bomb only to be launched from high altitude by b52?

Where was the hyperosonic part after losing the rocket blister?

I thought they've been working on scramjet engine since 1990s

👍👍👍

Kremlin Gremlins (Russians) be in the comment section all like...

@TheMarkRich

6 ай бұрын

Grammar gremlins will also be here...lol 😂

@glennllewellyn7369

6 ай бұрын

Russia isn’t the enemy mate.

@ZoomZoomMX3

6 ай бұрын

​@@glennllewellyn7369yes Russia is the enemy of democracy

@Benson_aka_devils_advocate_88

6 ай бұрын

​@@glennllewellyn7369 Depends on who you ask that question

@onionhead5780

6 ай бұрын

@@glennllewellyn7369Tell that to Ukraine.

Who will operate this missile system? Emma who has two mothers? 😅🤣😂

How do they overcome the oxygen erosion from hypersonic flight?

@poowg2657

6 ай бұрын

Ablative outer covering much like the heat shields on spacecraft.

@GeneralBlorp

6 ай бұрын

They use a certified decrodulator with equidistant mega-camshafts, calibrated to 36 rahlsteins of Bork. 🤔

@pliashmuldba

6 ай бұрын

@@GeneralBlorp Something like that would do the Moscow run in less than 0,31 Gugusec

@scottzehrung4829

6 ай бұрын

Ceramics.

@noahkleugh9323

6 ай бұрын

Thanks.@@scottzehrung4829

The Sprint missile was hypersonic in the 1970s.

Your audio sounds tinny

X 15 remember

Meanwhile, Russia laughs in Kinshal.

With 4 minutes of fuel, the farthest this will fly is 452 km (281 mi) range. Meaning you have to have them deployed in the area before hand. So, it has serious limitations. It's only slightly faster than an AAM.

@bud4792

6 ай бұрын

4 minutes of fuel isn't the max capacity. For tests, you don't want to run the possibility that you lose connection with the missile and then have it fly for another 2000km with no way to abort. With limited fuel, if something goes wrong, it just crashes in the ocean.

Because I also heard China and Russia are even having troubles developing engines for their new 5th generation fighter jets

@SilvaDreams

6 ай бұрын

China makes big claims but the J20 is barely a match for 1980s jet fighters.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

You heard wrong....the su 57 just broke the world record dash to 30k feet and the Chinese WS-15 is being successfully used in Chinese fighters. Russia is about to deliver 12 new su57 to the Russian air force and will deliver 22 more next year with new engines. The most powerful engine ever designed by the way.....

Mach five, like in "Speed Racer"!??? Mach ten, like "Ice Cube",says. 😄😆😅🤣😂👍

In the last test a minuteman with a conventional warhead does'n work good ... Usa is a decade ago on hypersonic missile from Russia . Rs 28 sarmat is the best gap.example. minuteman are obsolete.

Google the SPRINT MISSILE SYS.

Is it possible to make a mach 20 projectile

@JustAnotherPaddy

6 ай бұрын

Iran’s cruise missile does Mach 29

Ahhhhhh, finally. C'mon we need catch up others

If the USAF had listened to Boeing's advice there would've been 10 not four X-51As built.

Mach 6 if they make it pointy

Have the American really make it work? I doubt it but on the other hand, after Russia, China, North Korea and Iran have finished and tested their hypersonic projects, it's possible.

Unmatched, err no. The Russians are years in advance of the US in this type of Tech, but keep waving the flag if it makes you feel better.

a klingon chack ka torpedo is far far far faster and has a boom that makes the ground shake 3000 miles away.

It still means not one american ship is safe. But since everyone is getting it. It means no one is safe. Especially air craft carriers.

250 mi in 6 minutes. Yes ok, this might be slightly more expedient than my car. But does it have leather & a sound system I didn't think so

Seems to me like Scramjets are a real waste. They are more finicky, expensive, and overkill for long range weapons. Why not just settle for SLIGHTLY lower (mach 4-5) speeds and rely on Ramjet technology from the 1950s. The Meteor missile shows that Ramjets work well and have the range advantages of using air as the oxidizer for propulsion. Also, now we can use a solid fuel for Ramjets, making them easier to store. Personally, I think everyone just wants the latest and greatest, sexiest technology to implement the scramjet for the Generals, Congress, and the public, because "THEY" have it. Or maybe the Pentagon is just using it as an excuse to fund scramjets for their real, ideal purpose as a booster stage for a space vehicle. It might even be economical for a multi-mode single-stage-to-orbit vehicle. Turbojet-to-Ramjet-to-Scramjet-to-full-Rocket spaceplane would be really cool.

@Peter-Du

6 ай бұрын

I don't think it's any of that. Just to make military contractors money.. The US has plenty of conventional /nuke weapons to take care of perceived or feared threats. yes it is cool but at what cost?

@cubed0724

6 ай бұрын

But not if you make a hypersonic aircraft that's reuseable. Scramjets are amazing because you are literally using fast moving air to generate thrust to go faster.

The simple truth is that on the strategic level the actual targets for any US hypersonic missile are relatively limited ( mostly strategic nuclear tipped ballistic missiles). The whole development programs initiated by the CCP and Russia are a direct counter to US supercarriers,a strategic threat that neither country's Navy poses.I'm not denigrating the waverider as a technological achievement I'm noting that there are far fewer targets posing the level of threat that the US Navy poses to America's enemies.

@cubed0724

6 ай бұрын

This is why the US wasn't investing highly in hypersonic missiles, it wasn't for lack of knowledge, technology, and certainly not funding. It was that the cost of a hypersonic missile is 100 million dollars. So, the US instead developed hypersonic aircraft which we have operational right now, it's called the "Darkstar SR 72." Building a reuseable hypersonic aircraft that can carry massive number of payloads and nukes it far more effective, deadly, and scarier than a single hypersonic missile which the US has shown is easily intercepted with the war in Ukraine. Plus, China's hypersonic missiles can't hit their target and miss them by 20 miles, the Carriers have nothing to worry about.

Do we really need suresonic flight ?!😅

The first rafts, boats, wagons, cars and planes all tore themselves apart, too. This machine will require some new materials science to withstand the stress. Mach 20?

Military Industrial Complex needs to justify its existence . Taxes well spent.

🇺🇸🇺🇸👍

Wait I don’t believe any hypersonic weapons exist

USA still playing catch up in the field of hypersonic missiles.

its just a scramjet. SR 71 used this type from hypersonic

There are a number of US air and missile defense systems that use hypersonic interceptors.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

I think SM 3 and SM 6 are hypersonic but can't maneuver like the Russian stuff and have a much shorter range and very small warheads of used against ground targets.

I remember when russia used an image of a waverider to advertise their zircon

I doubt any thingbmoves. In low atmosphere at machb5 since heat would build to melt yhe apperatus. Unless it uses the heat to make the plasma shield🎉

The Russians developed hypersonic missiles 3 years ago. How is this cutting edge technology and the Russians S-500 and S-550 can travel at MACH 7. Get real dude

New toys😂😂😂

Russia has hypersonic missiles, China have them, even Iran. Why is it so difficult for the US to build them?

@themanwiththegoldengun1998

6 ай бұрын

Probably because they can't steal the tech... I know Ukraine deployed search and destroy units to steal or destroy russian tech

@Thetequilashooter1

6 ай бұрын

The US has built hypersonic missiles going back to the 1950s. Look up the US Skybolt that flew over Mach 12 in the 50s. Russia claims to have hypersonic missiles, but the Kinzhal was shown to be nothing more than a typical ballistic missile with a trajectory that can be calculated for interception. If it was truly hypersonic it would also be maneuverable, but it’s not. Russia claims to also have the Zircon, which is a copy of the US x-51 Waverider, but to date still has never shown it to actually work.

@spectre06x

6 ай бұрын

US is focused on direct energy solid state lasers. They are the fastest kinetic weapon in the known universe since nothing in the known universe moves faster than light. They are multi use unlike missiles as well. Hypersonic missiles are already on the verge of being obsolete.

@lescrooge

6 ай бұрын

Why bother when they've reverse engineered alien space craft

@everypitchcounts4875

6 ай бұрын

Russia, China and Iran have hypersonic ballistic missiles. Russia and China also have hypersonic glide vehicles. US has hypersonic cruise missiles like HAWC and HACM. USMC has a LRHW.

Yeah and they been on the moon too 😅

@doug8515

6 ай бұрын

Lol, so they keep trying to remind us...

Russia already has hypersonic missiles.

Obviously built for chasing and destroying enemy nuclear rockets while in flight. Therefore, another deterrent. However, laser technology should render these unnecessary. So, being deviant strategists, the intent seems to me to further pathologically screw already psychologically precious cultures. But for civil applications this is huge, especially the gliding possibilities.

@diyonthefly

6 ай бұрын

Except china is putting ceramic tiles on the warheads to pervert lasers from overheating them.

@JamesOMalley-hb4tf

6 ай бұрын

Laser?? The USA has no laser to destroy a ballistic missile or cruise missile. 😂

None of this matters UNLESS we get somethign that can defend against Hypersonic and nuclear missiles every time non stop. Otherwise we cant stop what the enemy has...

Is there any chance Elon couldn’t create something better for less money?

What ever the title Guarantees Unmatched Destruction and Precision is nothing but click bait.

3 tries and they give up? Where's Musk?

Windows 94? It must B🌲mendus

You should see the Thrustmaster F1, the fastest missile in the world. Mach 37.

@momcilopucar8749

6 ай бұрын

Stop watching Hollywood movies!! US has No Hypersonic missiles End of speculations. It's not forbidden to dream to have it. US Has NEVER landed on Moon. US is good only to fabricate lies and fantasies. Crimes around the world no one matched US yet. For that US is #1.

@pliashmuldba

6 ай бұрын

This is nothing compared to Mother Russia's Svoppidut Missile

@lescrooge

6 ай бұрын

You should see Grandma's slipper at lightspeed when I backtalk

@oldscratch3535

6 ай бұрын

Thrustmaster F1? Isn't that in your wife's nightstand? I think it uses AA batteries.

@Dmarkus_greene

6 ай бұрын

​@@oldscratch353518650 batteries

Like always, i hope the info exposed was at the proper extent and not too revealing.

@brahamjitrandhawa9955

6 ай бұрын

Anything that a KZread channel can dig up has already been known by people who we need to be aware of.