The Universe's Largest Planets
What makes a planet a planet? And what makes a star a star? Once we know this these defining characteristics, we start to notice that these definitions can overlap. Which begs the question, can a planet be bigger than its parent star?
SUBSCRIBE for more space videos: goo.gl/WX4iMN
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Ethereum Wallet: 0x5F8cf793962ae8Df4Cba017E7A6159a104744038
Become a Patron today and support Astrum! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Patreons can help pick the next Astrum Answers in a regular poll. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
Astrum Spanish: bit.ly/2KmkssR
Image Credits: NASA/ESO/ESA/Hubble/Space Engine/Universe Sandbox
Music Credits: Marek Poledna
Пікірлер: 978
Due to new information coming out, and because this video has a mistake, click here for the updated and corrected version of this video: kzread.info/dash/bejne/aqV5pZiintvdp6w.html
@flatmarssociety4614
3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! You're amazing.
Can a planet be bigger than its star? Long story short: maybe
@blackbed5108
4 жыл бұрын
So yes?
@Joanbueller007
4 жыл бұрын
Perhaps
@cryptaku3404
4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for saving me 7 minutes.
@nickkurzy2246
4 жыл бұрын
You just spoiled the movie!
@northgalaxy4228
4 жыл бұрын
If the star is denser i think
A correction - I mention that neutron stars have 10-29 solar masses. That is actually the mass range of the stars neutron stars originate from. Neutron stars after a supernova are actually about 1-2 solar masses. Sorry for the mistake!
@brunostudley2191
4 жыл бұрын
Astrum Hey your only human Alex 👍🏻
@monisrajput8056
4 жыл бұрын
I was confused too when you said that . It happens when we are dealing with things which are too technical Technically they are neutron star just a remnant of star But in my opinion it is not possible because if it is they are close enough that brown dwarf may suck the matter of its star . And it will becomes star and it can be bigger than that. Or crash into it because of both will be so close to each other . So for now it's impossible .
@theunknown4834
4 жыл бұрын
2:05 it dwarfs Jupiter considerably, let alone Earth is it the other way around? Earth < Jupiter
@scottdorfler2551
4 жыл бұрын
@@theunknown4834 Nice catch. You should go into editing.
@anderstopansson
4 жыл бұрын
So, can a planet be bigger than its parent star?
I need the James Webb telescope in my life right now to confirm all of this
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
Me too!
@worldwarii3060
4 жыл бұрын
Imagine the military budget but for science/space exploration.
@mysticranger6894
4 жыл бұрын
@@worldwarii3060 most military research crosses with tech used for space exploration. Wars give us advancement. Ironic as your name is here. Many current tech and knowledge comes from ww2
@trollmastermike52845
4 жыл бұрын
@@mysticranger6894 sad but true not only that alot of medical advancements that save humans every day only exists because of the extream and unrealistic if a war did not existed at the time where created
@sneakycactus8815
4 жыл бұрын
@@mysticranger6894 true. But i wish just a little bit of military budget was given to space exploration. US spends like $800,000,000,000 on the military annually. If its possible to maintain current military equipment and maintain current military advancement, take off a hundred billion off of that and hand it to space exploration agencies like NASA. If it isnt possible then hopefully one day we will find other means of funding space exploration as the US's military power is quite essential to world peace especially during these times where china is flaunting power on the SCS and harassing nearby countries
04:04 Impressive visuals for a Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram.
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
Yeh that was jaw dropping when I first saw it! Really clear and gives great context
@newswriting
4 жыл бұрын
@@astrumspace I've never seen most of the visuals you have here anywhere else. Great video, as always!
@Malkovith2
4 жыл бұрын
@@newswriting Check out Space Engine, it's a beautiful space simulator
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
I can't claim credit for the HR diagram, but I produced a lot of those visuals myself in Space Engine and Universe Sandbox. I agree with the above comment, you should definitely check them out, I'm sure you'd find it fascinating!
@newswriting
4 жыл бұрын
@@Malkovith2 Understood. Thank you!
Film and music stars are quite dense, Attracting a lot of mass.
@metaph3r
4 жыл бұрын
Dunno Anyone *ba da bum tsss*
@buddy5196
4 жыл бұрын
*Clap clap clap...*
@pranshuyadav1248
4 жыл бұрын
🚪👈
@marleysweendog
4 жыл бұрын
@@pranshuyadav1248 yeah walk through it bud that comment was class
@indivestor
4 жыл бұрын
Dope
Thanks for watching! I hope you liked this video, it was one of the most tricky ones for me to make, so I hope it worked out. There's a lot of information to digest in it, so feel free to pause the video to read the captions for more insight. All the best, Alex
@MarkHobbes
4 жыл бұрын
Can a planet be massive enough to make a star orbit it instead of the planet orbiting the star?
@NitinMurthy
4 жыл бұрын
@@MarkHobbes this won't happen, since the mass difference has to be extremely high(like the Sun to Earth) for the planet to star, which is impossible. However, if the planet and star have similar mass they'll orbit a point in space between the two.
@MK-je7kz
4 жыл бұрын
I can't see how a planet could be bigger than it's star. The planet would need to be hydrogen to be less dense than it's star, but still huge and somehow not to collapse onto itself. It would need to be like a semi-condensed gas cloud, which has enough mass to keep it planet-like blob and to resist it's star's radiation, but so evenly distributed and light that it wouldn't start to collapse. I doubt that's possible. What a asteroid crashing into it would do?
@gagannnnn
4 жыл бұрын
Just a feedback, The absurd pauses in between break the focus, it's weird, I'd suggest to get rid of them And this may be personal preference, but the pace of the video is kinda slow too. Nice voice tho, hope to see more :)
@NitinMurthy
4 жыл бұрын
@@gagannnnn I watch it in 2x and the pacing is good for normal watching. Other times I put it on normal speed to drift off or to relax.
4:08 *awww* probably the most beautiful H-R diagram I've ever seen
Who else imagined him smiling all the time while talking?
@KevAlberta
4 жыл бұрын
I kinda felt that
@sleepysp1der533
4 жыл бұрын
I WAS DOING THIS THE WHOLE TIME WTF
@randominternetwanderer6295
4 жыл бұрын
Same here people
@stahppls2293
4 жыл бұрын
You made me uncomfortable
@suborgtfo.4433
4 жыл бұрын
Ight imma head out.
Such a quality, awesome! I take my hat off to you👏 Keep it up!
@bluely8832
2 жыл бұрын
hello verified man
That animation at 4:04 was amazing
That was great Alex!!! Can I request a video on what a day would be like if our system was the more common type, with a binary star system? What would it feel like on earth, what consequences for orbital mechanics, if any?
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
I'll add it to the list!
@ForgivenMan-jl7bp
4 жыл бұрын
Easy answer, We would all be dead.
@jeffthatcher7736
4 жыл бұрын
Poop Shoot depends on the star. If it’s a small red dwarf in the outer solar system Then not much will change.
@yinyang1217
4 жыл бұрын
@@ForgivenMan-jl7bp that's only if another star teleports next to you.
@azultarmizi
4 жыл бұрын
wait, binary star system is more common? TIL
Imagine a solid lithium planet with the same gravity as Earth.
@JEMA333
4 жыл бұрын
Daniel W. blinding
@Cat_in_Spacetime
4 жыл бұрын
Hold up my Tesla batteries!
@NitinMurthy
4 жыл бұрын
*Elon Musk wants to know your location*
@josephk6136
4 жыл бұрын
@Insert your name your location is your mom's basement.
@frog5486
4 жыл бұрын
Call Me DB haha 12 year old
Man this was really informative. Thank you for uploading during this lockdown, this brightens my day so much !
*sees title* Immediately thought: well, there’s this thing called while dwarf/neutron stars
@DeMooniC
4 жыл бұрын
Also if a gas giant is orbiting a very small red dwarf very closely this planets can get bigger than the star, and red dwarfs are way bigger than a neutron star or white dwarf
@zankumo
4 жыл бұрын
I was thinking mass when I read the title and thought "No? That'd be interesting if a tiny star orbited a massive planet though"
@user-fl1st2ot2p
4 жыл бұрын
Neutron stars and white dwarfs aren't bright, hot, or big enough to be a planet's star
@DeMooniC
4 жыл бұрын
@@user-fl1st2ot2p ??? there is an know exoplanet orbiting a white dwarf as far as I know...
@user-fl1st2ot2p
4 жыл бұрын
@@DeMooniC What's the planet's name?
It's been out 20 seconds and I already like it
@Panzer_Runner
4 жыл бұрын
@Jeff O This got nothing to do with simping
@HeadsetHatGuy
4 жыл бұрын
@Jeff O shut up
You always deliver
This was an interesting question to ponder and explore. Thank you!
Great video!! I’ve always wonder this very question ! Thanks!
I love this channel so much
Can a planet be bigger than it's star? Astrum: Well yes, but actually no.
@rivenoak
4 жыл бұрын
@Logic our own sun is set to become a white dwarf and Jupiter will be superior to it. answer is yes
@CurdledTelorast
4 жыл бұрын
@@rivenoak White Dwarves are not stars. The answer is no, a planet cannot be larger than a star. This is true by definition.
@randomname5585
3 жыл бұрын
@@rivenoak that is if it isnt blasted away during the super nova lol
@rivenoak
3 жыл бұрын
@@randomname5585 no super nova, no nova at all; our sun will bloat to red giant (stops short of earth orbit AFAIK) and shrink to white dwarf after.
@MarshallTheArtist
3 жыл бұрын
rivenoak the Sun is supposed to envelop the entire inner solar system eventually.
The universe is vast and strange, therefore, we may find a planet that is bigger than it's star if we search harder.
@martinhorvath4117
4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, but Gravity... those planets would always be in a state of decay, the stars gravity will make it so, or the planet wouldn't even fall into orbit of the star. Since Stars make make matter into energy, it would feed on it. A star will always prevail a planet, since planets are basically failed stars.
@nazomimran3126
4 жыл бұрын
That's like saying we would find a closed that can fly if we keeps searching harder
@richardkammerer2814
4 жыл бұрын
We have a linear formation of four gas dwarfs exhibiting unpredictable culinary phenomena over the next few solar cycles. Sorry to interfere with important research!
50th like , thank you for making these video's , I have learnt so much from them . Sending u all the best from South Africa :)
Amazing and informative video, man. I always get excited when you upload new content. 👏👏.
Well done, as always. Thanks for sharing this with us.
Wow. Fascinating. I had never posed myself this interesting question. Thanks Alex.
Hey Alex! I hate to contradict you but the upper mass limit for a neutron stat is just over 2 solar masses. Love the channel though! Keep up the good work and best wishes.
Love stuff like this. Gives new perspective and imagination to what we could find out there. What is the biggest/grandest solar system possible would be another great topic.
been waiting for this topic!
who in the hell would downvote these videos? I find them wonderful actually spectacular. Keep em comin Mr.Astrum.
Its unlikely to exist around a main sequence. Since when forming the more massive object becomes the center of the gravity. Then all matter would flow towards it until it attains fusion.
@richardeverson3488
3 жыл бұрын
I suppose a large rogue planet could be caught in a smaller stars gravity.
Alex - your videos are the best on the subject - thanks for sharing this!
Man u do a great job. I look foward to watching your videos every week.
Those planets are simping around the star
@mikealpha4169
4 жыл бұрын
Stellar simping lmao
@bobbobroski4253
4 жыл бұрын
Can a pocket of air pressure exist in an infinite vacuum? Please make a video demonstration under controlled conditions, science! Thanks !! :D
It's interesting to think about how much other solars systems in the universe can vary from our own.
You have outdone yourself on this one. Fantastic job.
This is hands down one of my all-time favorite channels on KZread; It's very informative.
A white dwarf can still create pulsars, so any planet orbiting in it’s (or neutron star’s) pulsar would be heavily scorched.
In theory we could jump start a brown dwarf as long as it held the minimum required mass right.
@santosl.harper4471
4 жыл бұрын
Well, a few million monoliths should do the trick...
@Heavensrun
4 жыл бұрын
If it had the minimum required mass it wouldn't need jumpstarting.
@jeffo9396
4 жыл бұрын
@@Heavensrun I think the original poster was implying to keep throwing junk at the brown dwarf until it gets the minimum required mass.
@santosl.harper4471
4 жыл бұрын
FBI the Dwarf "decided" not to be a star! Such a humble existence indeed!
@troliskimosko
4 жыл бұрын
FBI he identifies as a planet 😤
4:34 I used that star chart that popped up in one of my constellation projects when I was smaller to show the biggest star in my constellation, aldebaran
Very interesting video! Thank you.
Big is a colloquial way to talk about an object of relative high mass and volume. I object that has a high volume is simply called a large object, therefore a Planet can not be Bigger than it's star in terms of mass & volume but it can certainly be larger, in terms of volume.
@HeadsetHatGuy
4 жыл бұрын
Why is your comment blank but when I click it, it has words
Yes, but not more massive.
@jaqand7280
4 жыл бұрын
@Logic That would result in the star orbiting the planet in question, making it lose it's "solar" system title, I would think.
@cadescableshow
4 жыл бұрын
Devils Advocate - yeah, by definition, a planet cannot be more massive than a star.
Alex your videos are awesome and so professionally done.. great work and love the channel.
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! I'm putting a lot of effort into the polish, glad it's noticeable :)
I like how you present information slow, so you give your viewers time to process what their hearing, unlike most other content creators in the same category who just spit out information, I can actually listen and learn what you're saying.
Me: aight i should go to bed My brain: MmH tHiS sEeMs InTeReStinG
My first thought before I watched was that a planet bigger than its star by volyme, but not by mass, should be possible. Nice to see that this was where you were going as well. If I am not mistaken most stars in the galaxy are red dwarfs? Quite a few of them could indeed have large gas giants orbiting them. Hopefully we will confirm this in time.
I watch these videos as much as I can, i want to say this is my favorite channel but i don't always watch astrum.. but sometimes I really need videos like this and it makes me so much more okay with my miserable life that I really need these videos
Interesting topic and great narration. Thanks for the video...
Can you please make video about "how nebula's are born" ?
*Short answer:* we dunno. Probably. I just saved you 7 minutes and 47 seconds.
@darkjanggo
4 жыл бұрын
thank u
@insightdragon8556
4 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@Retsbol
4 жыл бұрын
And skipping a lot of crucial side knowledge? Nah
@insightdragon8556
4 жыл бұрын
Retsbol FGNR nah
@Ziabetus
4 жыл бұрын
@@Retsbol nah
The way the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was condensed into a chart blew my mind. Genius
Your videos are superb. Great, unintrusive background music, great voice, great graphics, they're always unpretentious, informative and fascinating. Many thanks!
Please explain me how using direct imaging we get mass but not volume? I know very little of this stuff so I will be grateful if explained in simple terms.
@gonnathrowyouatomato5304
4 жыл бұрын
I think we do it by observing how much the parent start moves due to the gravitational pull from its planets
@N0Xa880iUL
4 жыл бұрын
@@gonnathrowyouatomato5304 that makes sense... Thanks
@gonnathrowyouatomato5304
4 жыл бұрын
@@N0Xa880iUL no problem, just mind that I'm no expert by any means and I might be wrong...
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
You are right!
The Sol system: We've only direct imaged a large planet, and most likely nothing else is there so we'll move on.
I love these videos! Thank you!
Great Video as usual
I feel like counting stellar remnants as stars is a cop-out.
That's Impressive,, I LOVE IT LIKE ALWAYS. BUT HOW DO WE NAME EXOPLANETS?
Fantastic visuals, audio and presentation. Thank you.
Great video with quality content, and great explanation skills! Thanks! 😀😀
I wonder if Methuselah Star ever had planets around it? Poor old guy, he would have so many stories to tell, books to write for another 14 billion years...
@kmuturi238
4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
Yea''''', but.... How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? That question has never been answered'. :|)
@afoxwithahat7846
4 жыл бұрын
Excuse me, what the frick
@alansmithee419
4 жыл бұрын
Four.
Always enjoy your videos. :)
Always interesting! Great- thanks!👍👍
Can someone explain how stars and planets are named? Why not like Fred or Amy? Obviously there’s more stars and planets than human names, so then why not Fred 4000 or Amy 9,000,000? 🤔
@baka_geddy
4 жыл бұрын
Because Scientists are Bad at Naming Things.
@armood1925
4 жыл бұрын
tweezerjam34 the reason for the weird names are that the international astronomical union puts standards on what scientists can name planets which are usually named after the star it orbits and a bunch of numbers and or the telescope that found it with a bunch of numbers. The reason they do this is that scientists have to track thousands of planets and the easiest way to do that is to use names like these
@yowaifps
4 жыл бұрын
Because they aren't human?
@tweezerjam
4 жыл бұрын
Armood 1 - thanks. I was only half serious but I did not know such things as which telescope found them were sometimes factored into naming. But here’s another question: my dad and stepmom were given one of those tacky “name a star after someone” gifts. So there’s a star out there called “annnjoe” (Ann and Joe). And there must be a few other silly names like that out there so how come you never hear about any of them? Is it just a numbers thing- the chance of one of these “freds” being noteworthy is just too slim? 🤔
Alguien por Dalas? XD
@lapeppa752
4 жыл бұрын
Si jaja
@silverwerewolf975
4 жыл бұрын
Que gente estupida
@lapeppa752
4 жыл бұрын
@@silverwerewolf975 Calmado
@sndyaaa89
4 жыл бұрын
Jajajajajajaja dalas
@Pirri7
4 жыл бұрын
También les recomiendo veritasium, es un canal de usa pero tiene su versión. En México español
Awesome. Love new knowledge.
i like the way you tried answering the question. this was a nice video.
ISN'T THE BIGGEST STAR HUMANITY HAVE DISCOVERED IS UY SCUTI
@centoe5537
4 жыл бұрын
RSGC2-18 has 2158 solar radii. UY Scuti has 755. RMC 136a1 has 315 solar masses, uy scuti has 10.
@xess4168
4 жыл бұрын
UY-Scuti is not the largest, I think it is the most massive however.
@Unknown-1407
4 жыл бұрын
@@xess4168 no its not the massivest star
@randomizedcontent9461
4 жыл бұрын
SSSSCCCCCUUUUUUUUUUUTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIII
@fossilftw
3 жыл бұрын
Largest? Yes. Most Massive? No
Please make a video on incidents which Physics or Scientists are not able to explain even today. Please don't include the already said incidents like Black Hole mysteries or any common thing. I expect something new and only few people know it and aren't able to solve them. PLEASE MY FRIENDS LIKE THIS COMMENT TO MAKE SIR DO A VIDEO ON WHAT I SUGGESTED.
I only knew about white dwarves and neutron stars. Thanks. I learned something very interesting today
I've needed answers like these
*REPORTENSE LOS QUE ESTAN POR DALAS Y CAMBIARON A QUANTUM POR ESTE CANAL* (Aunque no entienda una mierda)
@slimdaren
4 жыл бұрын
:,v yo si entiendo pero igual vine por el.
@nahuelgrau1874
4 жыл бұрын
Yo
@El_Clavel-Rojo
4 жыл бұрын
Xd
@george123ya4
4 жыл бұрын
No sé qué hacer :c ... Sería increíble que hagan las pases...
@xadribe
4 жыл бұрын
yo xd
Anyone else feel bad for Brown Dwarfs?
@altareggo
4 жыл бұрын
Well if its any consolation, i'm sure Snow White loves ALL the dwarfs, no matter what their color.
Awesome video and very well explained , a big hug to you from India 👍
Please do a feature on the ring nebula, great to find with a good telescope for budding astronomers, and a good topic to talk about as our own sun will one day suffer a similar fate. Thanks for your interesting posts
02:18 WHY IS THERE A SHADOW FROM THE NEUTRON STAR! A Neutron star would still emit light!
@TrueTydin
4 жыл бұрын
Tazuren Savu'len a flame will cast a shadow when back lit by a brighter light source such as a LED flashlight. Same thing applies here with a dim star lit by a brighter star :)
Vengo del Dalas
Love this channel
High-five for whoever created that HR diagram transition. Phenomenal way to show star classes. Oh! And great video too, Alex!! :-D
Hola, vengo porque ya no sigo a Quantum por ser un auténtico acosador.
@Pirri7
4 жыл бұрын
Veritasium,te lo recomiendo incluso tiene versión en español
@aa-to6ws
4 жыл бұрын
Uhhh. Que me perdí?
I'm commenting just aft seeing the title. In astronomical terms it is misleading without stating 'bigger' in, like density, diameter? We already know stars bigger in dia do rotate around neutron stars and black holes. Maybe u chose this title just to get our attn! 🤓😷
@Epsilonsama
4 жыл бұрын
Indeed the tittle is clickbait because in scientific terms words like big are not correct terminology. In colloquial terms big is a qualitative subjective statement regarding the mass and volume of an object.
Great video! I had no idea exoplanets had been directly imaged yet. I'm still staggered that we can detect them at all.
Really like your videos 👍🏻
Dalasito
I've never seen a Russel Diagram visualized/build from an actual picture of stars. Really cool.
Love your vids ma dude
Short answer - No, but it’s possible.
@arthurthekyogre9155
4 жыл бұрын
*w u t*
Kids can be bigger than their parents and so does planets than their star
Love it. Thank you from North West England UK 👍❤
Alex, thank you very much for your videos! What about a virtual tour of Alpha Centauri system? There is a newly discovered planet in the vicinity of Proxima Centauri, and I would like to know more about it
Technically neutron stars and white dwarfs are stellar remnants, not stars. This is a bit pedantic, but if you are gonna disqualify brown dwarfs...
So the answer is ... Yes.
Thanks, Alex, for another excellent video. A question I'd like to add to this is how large is the theoretical limit on a rocky/terrestrial planet before it either turns into a star or something stranger?! There is talk among exoplanet discussions of "super-earths" so I'm wondering how "super" they could get.. Best wishes and good health!
@astrumspace
4 жыл бұрын
The biggest "super-earths" they talk about are slightly smaller than Neptune... However they really don't have enough data on this yet so it could be a while before we have a more precise definition
Thanks. I learned something so now I go have a lay down to recover.
:v mini
Your narration skills have improved. Thank you.
Astrum never seizes to blow my mind
Smashing stuff