The ULTIMATE Edge Retention TEST / S30v vs 8cr13mov This WILL be surprising.

Тәжірибелік нұсқаулар және стиль

Edge retention testing between 8cr13mov spyderco tenacious and s30v spyderco sage 1.
This is the final word on these two knives..I believe. I understand theres a lot of edge retention testers here on youtube who seem to get semi consistent results with their edge retention cutting rope. And I'm don't want to take anything away from that with this test or its conclusion.
However, with that being said, there are a lot of uncontrolled factors involved with edge retention testing. Those factors include: sharpening consistency, test medium consistency, pressure during cutting, motion during cutting, cutting surface consistency, test medium consistency, knife steel consistency, human error, etc...All of these things have sure variables as well. Most of these can't be eliminated and thus problems can be found with any test done by a human.
So are my results conclusive in that I seem to be having consistent results between these two knives? No, I don't believe so. This is one, maybe two, data points (if you count the last test video). Two data points might as well be meaning less even if the results are semi consistent. In order to get an accurate definitive conclusion you would have to do multiple tests (at least 10) in order to get an average for each knife.
Why would you need an average? Because theres not a definitive point in which each knife becomes dull. It comes down to human interpretation of what is dull. Even on edge retention tests like shaving theres a gray area, where the knife will semi shave, and semi won't. That area may be 37 cuts, or it may be 39 cuts, or it may be 33 cuts. So at some point the human doing the testing has to make that call. Even a variation of plus or minus one cut can be a large percentage point over time.
Is it possible that the sage 1 in s30v had better edge retention in this video? Maybe, but that still leaves another question un answered. How much better is s30v over this particular tenacious in 8cr13mov? The answer to this is still unknown, and may never be known. As heat treating plays a bigger role in edge retention then the type of steel. Knife manufactures tend to leave their cheaper steels very soft. Perhaps, to keep knife blades from snapping, due to the cheaper knives often being used as prying tools. What knife would you rather pry open a paint can with, a $20 knife, or a $220 knife? Hence the need to keep those cheaper steels softer. Spyderco advertises that their tenacious has a Rockwell hardness range of 57-58. 8cr13mov can certainly be left harder into the low 60s. Which would certainly increase edge retention beyond that of the current standard for 8cr13mov. Maybe even surpassing s30v that has been left softer. This is just a theory as no testing has been done of this front.
There are some concerns about the particular sharpening stones used, and that s30v would perform better with diamond stone sharpening (due to possible carbide tear out). This may be true or may not be true. Again it all comes back to variables. One of those being, how to measure starting sharpness. Are both knives starting from the same exact sharpness? Theres no way of knowing. So maybe it just seems that diamonds have a better result because they make s30v sharper. This exact argument can be said for 8cr13mov as well. How do we know we are sharpening 8cr13mov to its fullest potential? If one knife or steel needs diamonds in order to get the most out of it, then maybe another knife needs to be sharpened to 8000 or 15000 or 30000 grit in order to see that same potential. Can you actually sharpen two different steels exactly the same, to the exact same apex sharpness? Again, as far as I know, this is not possible to determine unless under laboratory conditions. And even then how well each edge performed would likely depend on the testing medium.
So as you can see theres a lot more to this edge retention stuff then may meet the eye. If a knife performs well, then it performs well. And if a knife performs badly then it performs badly. Any number of factors can be attributed to knife edge retention performance.
Theres more but theres not enough space in the description..who knew there was a character limit?😀
Knife Sharpening stuff I recommend ⬇️
amzn.to/2CnyFjl
amzn.to/2ETD3rN
Cheaper stones I use all the time⬇️
amzn.to/2EPU2vh
amzn.to/2Cmk1IW
amzn.to/2CkQlMz
Folding knives I recommend
Best value for the money⬇️
amzn.to/2lTFEcX love this knife!
Favorite knife as of now⬇️
amzn.to/2lQfE23
Best cheap fixed blade⬇️
amzn.to/2CND28e
Camera gear⬇️
Main camera amzn.to/2CAnaIA
other camera amzn.to/2CjteBP
Mic amzn.to/2CmZOmj
Other mic amzn.to/2ERSPUq
These are amazon affiliate links.

Пікірлер: 526

  • @MrBigTexFyre
    @MrBigTexFyre4 жыл бұрын

    Amen brother. Your video is pure blasphemy to the steel snobs out there. I preach all the time that 8Cr13MoV is a lot better than what it is given credit. Knife guys have gotten so hung up on the exotics that unless it’s the latest, greatest, steel a knife must be junk. The truth is that most guys very seldom use their knives for tasks beyond cutting paper, string, opening envelopes, cutting cardboard boxes, and sometimes cutting mild food like apples. Sure, there are guys out there that use their knives for very hard tasks, BUT those guys will quickly tell you that a steel that can’t be easily sharpened isn’t very useful in the field. Thank you for your video. A big THUMBS UP! 👍🏼

  • @SuperBobbis

    @SuperBobbis

    3 жыл бұрын

    Like everyone I started out being a snob, but after a while I realised the only things important to me were sharpenability and corrosion resistance. If both of those are fine for you, any steel works, some just last longer.

  • @BOOSTEDLASER

    @BOOSTEDLASER

    3 жыл бұрын

    I am a proud steel snob ! I do think HTs vary a bunch between batches

  • @snackyxchan

    @snackyxchan

    3 жыл бұрын

    S30v isn't that high end but I get it

  • @BOOSTEDLASER

    @BOOSTEDLASER

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@snackyxchan better than AUS8 or 14c28n =P

  • @veganpotterthevegan

    @veganpotterthevegan

    3 жыл бұрын

    Tons of people that do a lot of cutting just get new blades from their company and don't actually care at all🤣

  • @GalaxysGreatestDad
    @GalaxysGreatestDad6 жыл бұрын

    Moral of the story: Buy the knife you like, steel be damned.

  • @royrogers3624

    @royrogers3624

    4 жыл бұрын

    Lyndon Durgan by that logic a mild steel blade is just as good of a choice as these 2 How about you see much change in similar quality steels just make sure your choice of blade is made of a quality steel

  • @davidk123

    @davidk123

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think that for example 420hc is in no way comparable to cpm3v. However the heat treat matter A LOT

  • @DangerDad29

    @DangerDad29

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@davidk123 how much iron is each steel? How does it compare? What are the actual differences And how does that stack up in real world use?

  • @dermotmcgreevy5220

    @dermotmcgreevy5220

    3 жыл бұрын

    ​@@davidk123 Lol didnt expect to see you here

  • @dermotmcgreevy5220

    @dermotmcgreevy5220

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@DangerDad29 3v will hold an edge much longer than 420hc but like david said the heat treatment matters alot 3v is also tougher than 420hc

  • @quaxenleaf
    @quaxenleaf2 жыл бұрын

    Through your sharpening videos and tests like this you’ve provided a much needed (and appreciated) service to the knife community. On top of that your videos are entertaining as hell.

  • @Spectt84
    @Spectt846 жыл бұрын

    To me, this is definitive (actually, to me the last test was enough for me to draw a conclusion. This video is just bonus re-assurance). You should not have to go to such lengths to prove the difference between a steel that costs more than double the price of another. The difference should be very apparent. In my experience, the blade steel of a knife is becoming less and less important when buying a knife. If you focus more on build quality, design, and edge geometry you will end up with a better knife overall. This testing was absolutely awesome, you could not have done a better job. Anyone who picks this apart is just "splitting hairs". Great job!

  • @Alex.P_10

    @Alex.P_10

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yep, steel type is really low on the factors of a blades ability to cut and stay sharp. The most important, to me at least, are geometry in the first place and heat treating second.

  • @TheGamerGuy1981

    @TheGamerGuy1981

    4 жыл бұрын

    @Jacob Dawson Pretentious hipster has entered the chat. P. S S30V isn't a shitty knife steel either..

  • @76ajc

    @76ajc

    4 жыл бұрын

    Agreed man. My OCD brought the Saintsations with it to cheer this man on. My first Spyderco was a tenacious that I got about eight months ago and it's surprised the hell outta me with build quality, fit and finish, as well as performance; but just the other week I picked up a Native 5 with the S30V, so I'll be doing my own little mini test this weekend lol. COVID should be renamed CO-VIDEO for all the projects I'm getting into.

  • @Danielson1818

    @Danielson1818

    2 жыл бұрын

    Exactly correct. There is no point of spending dumb amounts of money if the difference in steel isn't readily noticeable. I don't count myself as a "knife snob", but I definitely am an enthusiast. I believe we should take pride in our ability to sharpen and maintain our blades. Obviously, I've seen differences in steels, but some of this stuff is blown out of proportion when anyone with a little skill can keep a decent blade going, instead of placing their faith in expensive miracle steel.

  • @profd65

    @profd65

    Жыл бұрын

    "This testing was absolutely awesome"="Thanks for making the bullshit knives I buy seem better than they actually are"

  • @therealjoshtodd
    @therealjoshtodd3 жыл бұрын

    I really appreciate both your dedication to proper testing as well as your awareness and acknowledgement of variables. the science is strong in you

  • @DanGoodShotHD
    @DanGoodShotHD6 жыл бұрын

    Wow. I can't believe, not the money, but the time you spent to do this. Certainly not in vain as it was time much appreciated by us, your adoring fans! Seriously great video. Keep up the good work. Honestly, imho, it all comes down to marketing. For most regular folk, Mild steel vs 1095 yeah, you'll see a difference. But "super" steel vs regular stainless steel... not so much(if at all.)

  • @johnharris7353

    @johnharris7353

    Жыл бұрын

    Bet he doesn't have any fur left on his arms at all!

  • 4 ай бұрын

    You cant do more test because you have to wait for you furr to grow back :D

  • @pacificbushcraftandfirecra6358
    @pacificbushcraftandfirecra63586 жыл бұрын

    Interesting testing and results... Thanks for sharing Alex! Enjoyed.

  • @chrluc
    @chrluc6 жыл бұрын

    Great video! I think you did a really great job in trying to do all you can to eliminate all the possible variances while still recognizing those that still exist. It genuinely seemed like an honest video.

  • @marshallvanwagneriii1495
    @marshallvanwagneriii14956 жыл бұрын

    Great video, I had faith in your first edge retention test. Every day use, as far as I'm concerned, is the best test there is. Keep on keeping on!!!

  • @danwerkman
    @danwerkman5 жыл бұрын

    I really appreciate the time and effort you put into the edge retention videos. Real world is a special place.... not often visited by the comment section. Great vids and very useful information . Thx

  • @sraike
    @sraike6 жыл бұрын

    Great video. I've been using a Spyderco Persistence 8Cr13MoV to cut Amsteel Blue by Samson Rope every day for about 8 years now. This rope really dulls an edge on lesser knives or scissors but the Persistence has held up well with only bi-weekly tune ups with a ceramic.

  • @N0rthGym
    @N0rthGym5 жыл бұрын

    Highly appreciate you doing this video and sharing it with the rest of us

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for watching! I really appreciate it!

  • @fabiodelucca155
    @fabiodelucca1556 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video Sir. Keep up the great work!

  • @C42WatChe42C
    @C42WatChe42C Жыл бұрын

    awesome test, thanks for the hard work on this

  • @donnymac575
    @donnymac5754 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for confirming what I had suspected all along; that the average user won't be able to tell the difference between low-end and high-end blade steel. Now I won't feel so bad buying less expensive knives.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    4 жыл бұрын

    I has a lot more to do with heat treatment than steel type. 🙂

  • @jonduncansakurawallknifegarden
    @jonduncansakurawallknifegarden4 жыл бұрын

    This is the first test that I’ve seen online that actually has the smarts to take into account the cutting board in the back ... it’s hard to take any of these tests seriously when there are flagrant variables punching me in the mouth, the entire time I try to pretend enough to take them seriously - I really can’t say that there’s anything in your testing that I could try to find as a variable, or something that I haven’t thought of. I do appreciate Cedric and ada and all the steel tests that he does but there are a few variables in his work and he embraces that. This is as close to science as we can get with your tests. A sharpness tester would be the onnnnly thing that might give us a better result , being that the angle of the paper could be a variable possibly.

  • @PaulK390S90V
    @PaulK390S90V5 жыл бұрын

    On Cedric and ada channel he does a single swipe to test on the paper and if there is any hangup at all considers the test done. That's why his numbers are much different. Its crazy how changing just one variable has a huge outcome

  • @kaizen5023

    @kaizen5023

    2 жыл бұрын

    That's what I noticed as well about the way Pete does the paper cuts on Cedric & Ada channel. So, his bar for "Failed to cut paper" is much lower than we're seeing here.

  • @PM-wt3ye

    @PM-wt3ye

    2 ай бұрын

    @@kaizen5023But this doesnt clarify why there is almost no difference when there should be a HUGE one. Just the way a paper cut test is perfomed doesnt change that much, in real life use you would not recognize the slightest difference at all 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @readhill7771
    @readhill77713 жыл бұрын

    Very great test,thank you for your work.

  • @Mikey1951ful
    @Mikey1951ful6 жыл бұрын

    Much respect for all the effort (and expense) doing these tests. Thanks!

  • @OldPackMule
    @OldPackMule5 жыл бұрын

    Wow, you put so much work into this. Glad you dispels some of the myths. So many people buy high end knives and they end up never needing the extra capabilities. They end up being collector pieces. I’ve never tried Spyderco’s 8cr13mov but didn’t like Kershaw’s version. A good S30V or (my favorite) S35VN is all I’ll ever need in a pocket knife. Thanks. PS, would love to see you produce that light backpacking fixes blade.

  • @dannydrevo
    @dannydrevo6 жыл бұрын

    I liked these videos. They really reveal a lot. Like if you pay double for the steel, you certainly aren't going to get double the edge retention (or even a considerably noticeable difference). It will certainly make me a better consumer.

  • @ManVsLock
    @ManVsLock6 жыл бұрын

    Beast! Thanks for your dedication!

  • @ShootingUtah
    @ShootingUtah4 жыл бұрын

    It's crazy because I've noticed pretty big differences between steels like s35vn and say 8cr13mov and zdp-189 and CPM-154CM. These were across different brands, like Spyderco, Kershaw, and Benchmade. Like you said it's all about the heat treat.

  • @K3Flyguy
    @K3Flyguy4 жыл бұрын

    Funny thing is flint, chert, obsidian, bone and even wood can be sharpened to insane sharpness and re edged almost instantly. I have knapped glass and natural materials to (in some cases) nearly atomic edge thicknesses. All of them hold up long enough to do the job. Super steels are fun, interesting to use and work with but most have only a niche market. A good fitting, easy to sharpen, properly built knife should be a very easy tool to build, and in fact they are. Great video, thanks for sharing!

  • @thomasd728
    @thomasd7286 жыл бұрын

    you did your best. Too many variables...You drive yourself nutty Dude. I take my hat off to you.

  • @r1w3d
    @r1w3d6 жыл бұрын

    This was a good test. If anything you are showing people that it's the law of diminishing return in the sense that spending four or more times the money isn't going to translate into a knife that will hold an edge under real use for years. Great video Alex, I always enjoy them man. 👍

  • @BornIn1500

    @BornIn1500

    6 жыл бұрын

    Brandon Cornett the curve of diminishing returns. Not a law. Sorry but it makes a difference.

  • @r1w3d

    @r1w3d

    6 жыл бұрын

    BornIn1500 Sorry kid read up on your facts there is absolutely a law of diminishing return. I've known it for a very long time and I'm sure you could Google to look it up if your really need to debate it👍

  • @BornIn1500

    @BornIn1500

    6 жыл бұрын

    Brandon Cornett Wrong. There is no absolute law that mandates a diminishing return. There is a law of gravity because it must happen. Diminishing returns aren't an absolute at all.... kid

  • @r1w3d

    @r1w3d

    6 жыл бұрын

    BornIn1500 OK haha I'm sorry but I'm not going to argue with someone that assumes or claims they know of which they don't. When I got an engineering degree I learned that there are people you just cannot argue with because those people will stand to the death by what they speak and even with contrary evidence they will not concede. You have a good one buddy 👍

  • @chrisbleurgh7425

    @chrisbleurgh7425

    5 жыл бұрын

    I wonder if that last reply was intentionally ironic, but it certainly sounded like it.

  • @MrProctitus
    @MrProctitus3 жыл бұрын

    Creat video and great effort, thanks you. One question, which was easier to sharpen? (Sorry if this has already been asked)

  • @causmogroov3764
    @causmogroov37646 жыл бұрын

    You are a serious TROOPER!! Damn....I appreciate you and your tenacity!

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    You should see the blister I got from all this😉 Even through the glove😩

  • @shavefan12
    @shavefan126 жыл бұрын

    Amazing test, thanks for all the work you put into this. As for ease of resharpening, how do they compare?

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    I stropped them both back to hair whittling in a couple seconds on green compound. So hot much difference there😀

  • @kevin3837
    @kevin38373 жыл бұрын

    I came to a similar conclusion when I tested a buck 112 in 420hc vs a Spyderco Delica in vg10 cutting cardboard. They cut so much I honestly didn't want to cut anymore and were still sharp. The 420 surprisingly held up a little better (probably due to the hollow grind) but the big difference is the $50 price difference between the two.

  • @daveglarner2138
    @daveglarner21386 жыл бұрын

    This was great, dude. Moral of the story here is that even if you have all of these variables to consider, at some point there should STILL be some sort of tangible, blistering difference to show off.......and there's just not. Maybe I still won't run out and buy every 8cr13mov knife I can find, but I'll certainly respect the ones I have. I really enjoyed this.

  • @BBQDad463
    @BBQDad4634 жыл бұрын

    I thank you for these testing videos. You have provided an invaluable service to knife enthusiasts. I concur with you: A decent steel, properly heat-treated, will give excellent performance.

  • @CB-zx3jn
    @CB-zx3jn10 ай бұрын

    This is another great test video. Good job! I'd like to make one comment that I've never seen addressed (I likely just missed it elsewhere). Speaking of variables, I've noticed that when doing paper-cutting tests, it's important to find out which direction the "grain" of the paper is going on that particular piece of paper, and only use that side of the paper for your cutting test). So, if your knife cuts the paper easily when using the "side" of the paper sheet, then you try to use the "top or bottom" of the sheet, and your knife hangs-up, then you know that you should only cut the paper using the side of the sheet, for consistent results. I am always tempted to use another "clean" edge of the paper, whether it be the side, or the top/bottom, while testing my blades, and I sometimes would get frustrated that when using the side of the paper, the blade would cut like a laser thru butter, but when changing to another clean side of the paper (the top or bottom), suddenly the blade would not perform so well. So basically, for consistency purposes, when using paper sheets for testing, just stick to either the sides, or the top/bottom of your paper sheets once you have found out which direction the paper grain "works" for the blade. That should give you a better idea how sharp the blade really is. l know this sounds very simplistic, but I'm primarily making this mention for folks who have never used the paper technique for testing their blades. Anyway, keep up the good work and we'll be looking forward to more reviews!👍

  • @ihateeverything3972
    @ihateeverything39724 жыл бұрын

    Keep getting ads for manscaped, but how do you think I test if my knives are sharp?

  • @weswhaley
    @weswhaley4 жыл бұрын

    I love these test great job! Do knife company's pay you to test their knifes and compare them yet? Well if not you deserve it that took quiet a bit of work. Alot of respect my dude!

  • @tomfury6276
    @tomfury62764 жыл бұрын

    I have a k74 with aus8, I beat this knife on a daily basis, sharpen it everyday (2 mins), it handles every task I need it for, no need for super steel. Great video, love your channel!

  • @deathofkindness
    @deathofkindness6 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video sir. .thank you

  • @IntelWond
    @IntelWond13 күн бұрын

    That was pretty interesting. Thanks!

  • @me2bfc
    @me2bfc4 жыл бұрын

    I comented on the other video too. One of the issues with edge holding testing is the relationship between dulling and the amount of material needed to reach a given dullness. Very high sharpness is lost quickly, so small amounts of material cut show large changes in sharpness. However, there is a point where things level off and it takes many times the amount of material to show the same magnitude of sharpness change. It might only take 40 cuts to remove easy shaving ability, but cutting to the point it stops cutting paper might be 1000 cuts. I've cut over 3000 feet of cardboard with a $5 knife and it would still cut a folded piece of paper sitting on a table corner.

  • @doctoruttley
    @doctoruttley5 жыл бұрын

    Good work! 👌🏻

  • @awesomereviews1561
    @awesomereviews15614 жыл бұрын

    Heat treatment is the key of all steel. Use 440C with a good heat treatment and it will performs really well

  • @grogdocr

    @grogdocr

    3 жыл бұрын

    I'd be more interested in seeing a comparison between different company's heat treatment. I've owned a few Chinese made Kershaws with 8Crblahblah steel that I was sharpening constantly. Meanwhile my made in China Spydercos/Byrds (same steel) hold up a thousand times better.

  • @hansblitz7770

    @hansblitz7770

    3 жыл бұрын

    Buck's treatment is pretty awesome. Just wish they used a good assisted operation and made them ambi carry.

  • @CliffStamp
    @CliffStamp4 жыл бұрын

    As a point about terminology which is kind of important : -variables are not things you want to eliminate, they are things you design into your experiment There is the independent variable, that is what you control or pick (in this case it is the steel type), then there is the dependent variable that you are measuring which is so called because it depends (changes in response to) the independent variable. (it is possible to have multiple dependent and independent variables, I have done research where there are up to 20+, but in general unless you have a reason to, you just design with one of each) -variances are things which change and you wish they did not, you don't design them into your experiment, life does In this case they are things like : -the level of abrasion per cut in the hemp due to the material -speed, force and handle of the cuts -humidity and temperature in the shop -angle/speed/control in cutting the paper This is a long list, it is basically everything you think which could cause your measurement to change. What you want to do is try to minimize these, BUT, taking care not to make your work so artificial you end up not even measuring what you wanted to. For example if you controlled everything precisely with no random variances, well you likely would end up with something which measured abrasion resistance but that likely isn't what you would want (plus you can just look it up, or predict it from empirical models in the literature). And there is even something worse, there is a whole list of factors which cause variances (also called sources of error, but that often confuses people because they think it means you are doing something wrong) because you are using judgment : -how to tell when the knife stops cutting paper cleanly/shaves -how to handle a possible outlier -the need to do yet another run because the results "don't make sense" -rejection of the data, looking for an explanation to find some preconceived notion No one thinks they do this because everyone thinks they are awesome as sciencing - except actual scientists who know they are really horrible at it, which is why you have to use blinding protocols to prevent it. Anyway, like anything else, there isn't an end to what you can know from cutting trials, it just depends on how much work you are willing to put into it, based on what you want to get out of it.

  • @levkvarner9865

    @levkvarner9865

    3 жыл бұрын

    He just did how he wanted. At home you can make any test with approximate results. The result is that you have a conception.

  • @SailfishSoundSystem

    @SailfishSoundSystem

    3 жыл бұрын

    The Master returns!

  • @OttoVonChriek

    @OttoVonChriek

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@SailfishSoundSystem no

  • @Dirkietje8

    @Dirkietje8

    2 жыл бұрын

    Great breakdown of the scientific process, as we always got told at uni 'measuring once or even twice doesn't really tell you anything'. As much as I'd hate to admit my old Statistics teacher was right but actual science is in statistics and changing all the variables according to a DoE/Box-Bencken model to once and for all determine which variable has how much of an impact. But then again, I just sharpen my blades how I like them (more acute than factory edge, usually slight secondary convex, scandi's never stay true scandi's, everything on whetstones and leather strop to a high polish) and they cut wood fine without ever having to worry about big rolls. I like nerding over the steels without caring that much about my own edges because they all function exactly as I'd like them to do.

  • @matchesburn

    @matchesburn

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@OttoVonChriek Cliff Stamp has forgotten more about knife steels, edge geometry and sharpening than you could probably learn in multiple life times. Go to any place with enthusiasts that actually know anything, like BladeForums, and start asking about Cliff Stamp. You'll see he's held in high regard in the knife community. And for good reason.

  • @dorenlee8918
    @dorenlee89185 жыл бұрын

    I"m new to knife making but am experienced in knife using. Last year I got an Elk and through the gutting and skinning process I found that my old Buck 110 held an edge far beyond any of my other knives. I have damascus steel a SOG knife and various other knives. Nothing compared to the Buck made with 440c. I am fixing to make a knife out of D2 and am hoping for an edge retention better than the 440c. Thank you for the videos they inspire me in my new found hobby.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    5 жыл бұрын

    440c is a great steel. It was the original “super steel”. I personally like regular old high carbon steel like 1080-1095 if it’s heat treated well. I’d like to do some knives in d2 in the future as it has some interesting properties. D2 really needs a cryo or cold treatment for it to really shine though. If you get it right it makes an excellent knife steel.

  • @Woodswalker1965
    @Woodswalker19656 жыл бұрын

    Well...there ya go. Two times with basically the same results. Thanks for taking the time and money to do these tests. I'm ok with my cheaper steels, 01, vg10, a2, etc. The more you sharpen the better you get at it right haha. BTW I use the Lansky System as well for reprofiling and sharpening some of my flat grinds. Great tool! Cheers!🍻 Wade

  • @ukaszborowik932
    @ukaszborowik9324 жыл бұрын

    Captains log "Day 2 of testing" Love it

  • @marksummerfield357
    @marksummerfield3576 жыл бұрын

    I'm glad your getting beyond this and look forward to more videos that have nothing to do with edge retention.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    This was just to satisfy my own curiosity. If I didn’t make a video of it I wouldn’t be able to justify this test. I may do some more of these in the future but only just for fun. Thanks for the comment 👍

  • @nickmacaluso6585
    @nickmacaluso65855 жыл бұрын

    I like your test. It’s unique because it shows how much to dull a knife to a working edge. You most certainly would see a difference if you took the testing further and used a more wear resistant blade like Xhp or zdp, probably double or triple the edge retention. But I never let a knife go past shaving sharp, not many truly obsessed fanatics do. So in a way your tests are more relevant and to my kind of use.

  • @ticklesdust
    @ticklesdust3 жыл бұрын

    wow great video. is there an edge retention test that looks at the same knife but different sharpening angles? Or, for that matter, same knife but cutting into harder to cut objects like sticks and overzealous use of plastic cutting boards? Seems that would maybe be the area that a harder steel would perform better. Though, i think a common misconception is the steel erodes, when it more likely deforms.

  • @Daniel-yj3ju
    @Daniel-yj3ju4 жыл бұрын

    nice work. well done

  • @mondavou9408
    @mondavou94083 жыл бұрын

    Nice test and good communication though out -thank you. I wished you had been able to use a sharpness scale to quantify results but still a solid test. Given I have a Benchmade 940 S30V and a SpiderCo Tenacious 8Cr13MoV. I would say carry what is comfortable. I personally prefer everything about the Benchmade but when I think about the fact I can get three Tenacious for one 940 - it doesn't make any sense its not three times better.

  • @mail2ted
    @mail2ted6 жыл бұрын

    Great stuff, the only thing I can conclude is an excellent heat treat on the 8cr by Spyderco. I wouldn't be surprised if the Spyderco 8cr out performed most others.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    I wouldn't either. 😀

  • @paulmarshall9189
    @paulmarshall91893 жыл бұрын

    Good vid. My basic edge retention test is is similar to yours, with the same rope. I use (lighter) notebook paper. My general observation is within reason, geometry comes first, then hardness, then chemistry as a distant third. With the same 3/8 sisal rope, I got 250 cuts out of an S30V PM2 @ 15* DPI up to a green strop, 500 cuts from an M390 PM2 with same sharpening, 650 cuts from an M4 PM2 with same sharpening, and 1,600 cuts from a convexed Rex45 PM2. I got 500 cuts from Busse PR's in INFI and SR101 with the 15* DPI arrangement, and 700 cuts from a BA3. 1,200 cuts from a convexed BR B1 LT 3V, and 1,550 cuts from a Busse BAD (60-62 Rc) convexed and thinned out.

  • @paddyspotatopeelers2154
    @paddyspotatopeelers21546 жыл бұрын

    I love watching people spitting feathers.up and down the world feathers are floating in the air.great completely logical test.thank you.atb paddy.👍☺🍀

  • @j1166240
    @j1166240 Жыл бұрын

    Thank you for doing this video! I actually carry a Victorinox #1 EDC and have Victorinox knives in my kitchen knives. Some people consider this steel very low grade. I think being able to resharpen easily is more important than edge retention for what I do, and it never rusts. When professional butchers, who use a knife daily for work, recommend and use Victorinox that tells me something. I find the best solution is use whatever steel works for you in your personal needs. Same for golf clubs, there has been some advances in technology, but for the most part it comes down to what works for you and what you can afford.

  • @patrickderp1044

    @patrickderp1044

    11 ай бұрын

    victorinox has salespeople who go to all the butchers and plug their product

  • @kgrimm5576
    @kgrimm55766 жыл бұрын

    Interesting... I'm blown away ya got those results on the sisal. Try testing on that seasoned hickory : )

  • @hotpeper2692
    @hotpeper26926 жыл бұрын

    Love your vids bro

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    Thanks!

  • @OtherSide..
    @OtherSide..3 жыл бұрын

    Man you're like a genius or something good work

  • @marcdee4427
    @marcdee44272 жыл бұрын

    Brilliant 🤩 video, I had no idea knife steels were so varied. I’ve always loved Swiss Army knives but all you experts seem to say the victorinox steel is softer than butter. So now I’m thinking 🤔 of getting an edc with better steel, only problem is I’m England based and we are not allowed lock knives. I like the leather man charge tti but again it’s a locker . So have you got any suggestions? I always liked Buck knives but apparently the steel again is only average according to stuff I’ve read . If the world’s army use Swiss Army knives I would of thought they must be good 👍🏻, can you give me some sort of handle on all this I’m lost 😞. Please understand I am a complete novice in this area I’m only trying to find out what steels are good and what ones are not so good, I’m still in shock about my saks being soft I thought they were brilliant knives I still do , but maybe that’s cos I’ve only ever used them or leatherman

  • @matthewblunderbuss4545
    @matthewblunderbuss45454 ай бұрын

    I love both guns and knives but shooting different calibers into gel is certainly less mathematically and physically intense than doing a test like this much respect for this research.

  • @USAUSAM82
    @USAUSAM826 жыл бұрын

    Your test is a great one! Its reasonable and practical. Thanks to you, ive determined that the expensive stuff is not worth the price and the difference is just splitting hairs. 🤣

  • @P226nut
    @P226nut Жыл бұрын

    thank you for this

  • @bulbchangingmonkey
    @bulbchangingmonkey4 жыл бұрын

    Alex this video definitely deserves a thumbs up from me!

  • @bulbchangingmonkey

    @bulbchangingmonkey

    4 жыл бұрын

    And got it!!!

  • @21bob61
    @21bob616 жыл бұрын

    Great video

  • @AlergicToSnow
    @AlergicToSnow4 жыл бұрын

    With that many repetitions, on average, all these variables work out to be pretty much the same for each knife. I think you have a reasonable conclusion. There isn’t enough practical difference to justify a huge difference in price.

  • @armenarakelian9876
    @armenarakelian98762 жыл бұрын

    Phenomenal video.

  • @krustysurfer
    @krustysurfer2 жыл бұрын

    Great testing Alex thank you for sharing your observations and your wisdom with us probably confirming some people's fears and infuriating some people's pride that is a good thing to do lots to consider I just bought a couple ganzo blades and a few other things this weekend to test out and try and see if I like and they have cheaper steels on them 440C instead of D2 or a powder Steel I'm going to see if I like them they were inexpensive and look well made and got good reviews so I'm going for it all right thank you again

  • @PM-wt3ye

    @PM-wt3ye

    2 ай бұрын

    Wow, what a sentence 🙈 maybe u can use something like . and , in the future 😅

  • @krustysurfer

    @krustysurfer

    2 ай бұрын

    @@PM-wt3ye google voice transcription....... Sorry

  • @mildyproductive9726
    @mildyproductive97266 жыл бұрын

    8Cr13 is the perfect, generic, baseline, stainless knife steel. 13% chromium is the proven amount to improve corrosion resistance before diminishing returns kick in. 0.8% is the maximum amount of carbon you can have without forming large, chunky (and largely detrimental to 99% of things a knife is used for) chromium carbides. There are tons of knife steels that are essentially the same stuff as 8Cr13. 440A, AUS8, AEB-L, and many other stainless steels are very similar to 8Cr13. Aside from this, the only really important indicator of "quality" in a steel is having low sulphur content. The lower, the better. Any sulfur in the steel is an impurity. Phosphorus is added to "neutralize" and minimize the negative effect of sulphur. The other stuff is mostly incidental. Note, the only thing that makes any of these steels better than 1080 or 1095 is the stain resistance. In essentially every other measure of a knife that matters, 1080 is just as good but with better toughness. 8Cr13 is essentially the stainless version of 1080. The "80" in 1080 refers to 0.8% carbon. 1095 has 0.95% carbon. Any exotic knife steel deviating from this 0.8% and 13% is mostly for bragging rights. Some of these alloys have special properties which make them very useful... for things other than knives. It's cool that people have come up with other ways to make a good knife steel, but "better" will need to be defined very narrowly to apply. It would be more accurate to say that these exotic steels are more exclusive. This is enough to justify the cost. Same way some baseball cards cost more than others. Sypderco makes limited runs of their knives, and the exotic steels are more rare in number. The hardcore dudes want to have 'em. The 4x higher cost is not because they are even twice as good. It's because they are more expensive to make. It costs more to have more SKU's/models. It costs more to manufacturer, stock, sell, support more products. It also costs more to grind more abrasion-resistant steels, as is the case for some of these exotic steels. When you buy this top end product, you are paying the cost of the manufacturer to maintain multiple products, where in old USSR, you might have just "knife." Take it or leave it.

  • @Lukasrb76

    @Lukasrb76

    5 жыл бұрын

    I agree💪

  • @moealfaleh5606

    @moealfaleh5606

    5 жыл бұрын

    I own plenty of knives of all steel ranges. The only real difference I can tell is microchipping or rolling of the edge occurs sooner in cheaper steels. However, sharpening those steels back to 100% is super quick. Sharpening S30V and higher takes a good amount of time. Overall, for a guy like me who mainly uses knives for food, opening boxes, and cutting up cardboard. The steel does not matter as long as it is sharpened properly.

  • @travispratt6327
    @travispratt63272 жыл бұрын

    Another youtuber did an edge retention test by setting up a jig that dragged the edge across an abrasive with the same pressure then tested the sharpness with a sharpness tester. Sharpness testers are expensive but i’m pretty sure you can get the same sharpness test with a simple scale and thin wire (or even thread) stretched between two blocks of wood on the scale to measure pressure needed to cut. This setup would allow you to quickly wear down the edges, do many samples and resharpenings and remove pretty much all the human variables, while not wasting any rope or spending ridiculous amounts of time actually cutting or shaving. I’d really like to see this done on d2 vs 8cr13mov, as it seems the majority of reasonably priced knives use these steels.

  • @scottecooke
    @scottecooke6 жыл бұрын

    at 6:20 - 6:35 that is because of the grain of the paper. It is always easier to cut across the grain (cutting on the long side for printer paper) because it takes more force to rip it that way. Therefore the knife will cut at a lower sharpness than cutting on the short edge. I hope that made sense, it did in my head lol.

  • @mikelikesknives428
    @mikelikesknives4286 жыл бұрын

    Okay, okay it's time to get back to knife making. This edge testing is to difficult. Time to make a new knife. Great video by the way. Very thorough.

  • @thiago.assumpcao
    @thiago.assumpcao3 жыл бұрын

    What is important on edge retention tests is finding major differences. You don't need to pick a winner, the fact is that they are about the same and that conclusion is very important, specially if you consider price.

  • @richardhenry1969
    @richardhenry19693 жыл бұрын

    Great video, I just wanna add something you made me think about. I remember buying kershaw an spyderco from snap-on back in the late 80s knives didn’t hold a edge like they do now. I remember when aus8 was the end all be all budget steel an 8cr held its own with them enough that everyone switched an people still bought knives. The big thing in my mind ,that was a game changer was cheap diamond stones it used to take forever to sharpen now I can sharpen a really hard steel in minutes. I believe heat treatment is the key. Like Benchmade found out on sales from their 4v but fanboys believe the lies when the manufacturer claims we left it soft for sharpening. Lol why not use cheaper steel. I believe a lot of it is just marketing if not steel like 1095 would not sell as much. The facts are in production knives they don’t take the time to heat treat to whatever steels optimum hardness is, but charge prices like they do. I really can’t justify $400 or more for a production knife. And I can’t understand why people do that’s why I rag on CRK fanboys a 30 year old design with soft steel the knives shouldn’t be over $50 I love when they say tolerances are very good they should be they are CNC parts not like 50 years ago. Everything is marketing a production knife shouldn’t cost as much as my gun. Without inlays an fancy materials but these companies are not really helping improve anything like crkt charging big money because they have a strong new lock. Instead of charging for what you have into it. I’m not saying customs are not production an people need to realize these companies act like they are custom like microtech.Anyway that’s my bitch great job an I think your 100% on point trying to prove a unprovable point the manufacturers don’t care about or they would be showing it in marketing you know

  • @virtualshift
    @virtualshift4 жыл бұрын

    I like you're video. If I was going to buy a Knife, I would prefer it to have S110V or M390 steel. Those steels are the best I have ever used and have gone the longest without have to sharpen!

  • @ramonarroyo5573
    @ramonarroyo55735 жыл бұрын

    AWESOME bro thank you Berry much.

  • @ColdHawk
    @ColdHawk4 жыл бұрын

    I just plucked a really tenacious hair out of my ear. I think I should mail it to you to use for some comparative edge retention testing. Trust me when I say, this thing will separate the men steels from the boy steels! Nice video - even if “sigh-‘sel” rope is an inferior test medium compared to my ear hair.

  • @mountaindont34ify
    @mountaindont34ify4 жыл бұрын

    Hey man how did you learn to do all this? Knife making and heat treating machine shop work..Trade school?

  • @frenchieedc7602
    @frenchieedc76026 жыл бұрын

    watch out on the way that you are cutting the paper ! At 7:30 you are cutting again the grain of the paper, so at a certain point of sharpness a knife is gonna have more difficulties to cut the paper again the grain (that's why you have so many hang ups). But if you cut with the grain with that same edge, it's gonna be more simple for the knife to cut the paper (so almost no hang ups) !

  • @BornIn1500

    @BornIn1500

    6 жыл бұрын

    Frenchie EDC cardboard can have a "grain" but I've never seen regular white printing paper have a grain.

  • @johnyoung5227

    @johnyoung5227

    6 жыл бұрын

    As a printer I can assure you paper does have a grain, when wetted it will expand about 5 times more across the grain than with the grain.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    6 жыл бұрын

    This was just a sample that I showed. I cut probably 100 sheets of paper during this test. Obviously I can't show them all😀

  • @frenchieedc7602

    @frenchieedc7602

    6 жыл бұрын

    It was just an "important" remark for me. ;) Btw i really like your videos, keep it up the great job !!!

  • @Wolf_K

    @Wolf_K

    5 жыл бұрын

    Dapdoi Ardon Simple, the way that is harder to push cut is against the grain. Take a single piece of newsprint and pushcut it, turn the paper 90° and do so again, you will notice a huge difference. . Pushcutting newsprint at a true 90° perpendicular angle is harder than slicing or pushcutting with the grain. Mess around with it and you will see. If you can pushcut newsprint against the grain, holding only one side of the paper around half an inch from point of cut, then your knife is indeed very sharp. However, pushcut sharpness is quite different to slicing sharpness. If you can do the same, against the grain, on lightweight Rizla (Greenpack) cigarette paper it is sharper than the best razor blade. Most will never be able to achieve this level of sharpness, regardless of sharpening method as it takes patience and skill. It’s a worthy goal to achieve though so good luck. ;)

  • @Al-ds3sw
    @Al-ds3sw6 жыл бұрын

    Best edge retention test ever real world use and the truth thank you for making the videos you do I watched similar videos to this in the past and always believe that the person doing the video was picking his favorite steel in a lot of the videos you can almost see the person sabotaging the test while cutting paper I really enjoy your videos

  • @kengamble8595
    @kengamble85956 жыл бұрын

    Probably time to say, it is what it is, and move on! 😊 You can ask twenty people and get twenty different opinions ! I do appreciate your time and effort in this endeavor, it was interesting ! Thanks for sharing and take care. 👍

  • @evanlynam3937
    @evanlynam39376 жыл бұрын

    Nice vid👍

  • @adamtimmins3035
    @adamtimmins30356 жыл бұрын

    Maybe we need to try s30v from another brand and see how it compares to spyderco.

  • @william1973ist

    @william1973ist

    5 жыл бұрын

    That would really be the best I think. I really think if you have your sharpening tools and skill set dialed in, you can get these kinds of results from steels that treated well by the same manufacture if they are consistent in heat treating.

  • @charliemartin4392

    @charliemartin4392

    5 жыл бұрын

    Bucks s30v bos

  • @georgemorley1029

    @georgemorley1029

    4 жыл бұрын

    aCID sPAZ Yeah you’ve got to test the test before you can test, otherwise the testing will be testing. I’ll attest to that.

  • @TheArtistGR
    @TheArtistGR10 ай бұрын

    Cool stuff

  • @grahamoutdoors8270
    @grahamoutdoors82706 жыл бұрын

    Again another great video Alex!!! Keep it up bud you're doing great!!! Just add more knife making videos 😁 make some more bush-crafting knives. Would you ever sell a knife you made to a subscriber?

  • @jordantyler29
    @jordantyler295 жыл бұрын

    with the paper test it depends on what side of the paper your using. The long edge or short edge one side depending on the paper will always be easier to cut than the other, it'll be the same on each side so both of the long sides for this paper he is using will easier to cut versus both of the short sides which will be harder to cut it's like this with pretty much all paper

  • @bradenrahmany6481
    @bradenrahmany64816 жыл бұрын

    Can you make a vid on how to sharpen a convex

  • @CSGraves
    @CSGraves4 жыл бұрын

    I'd like to see someone incorporate a Rockwell hardness test and one of those digital knife sharpness scales into the sisal rope cutting test. Then, we'd have a less variable measure of sharpness than slicing paper or shaving arm hair, & one could account for HRC. True, a cheap steel with proper HT can do well, and an ostensibly better steel fare poorly with improper heat treat, but modern supersteels (Rex121, Maxamet, ZDP-189 et al.) often allow a higher HRC than is practicable in the cheaper steels of yesteryear. Sisal may be inconsistent as a test medium as per distribution of overall material, as well as abrasive minerals, silicates, etc... but it's relatively economical, bio-degradable, and the consistency probably averages out with repeated testing.

  • @OUTDOORS55

    @OUTDOORS55

    4 жыл бұрын

    I generally agree with your points. Although some simple carbon steel (1095 for example) is capable of very high hardness of 65+ before tempering. A proper temper and it can really perform. Unfortunately most manufacturers take it to 56-58 range where it is super tough. I suppose its done for liability and warranty issues but thats just a guess. Thanks for the comment 👍

  • @IlliniDog01
    @IlliniDog012 жыл бұрын

    What was the HRC of the Sage? I suspect it was pretty close to the Tenacious. The steels are probably similar enough that they would perform similarly at similar hardness in a sharpness test. I think S30v's biggest claim to fame is that it holds a working edge much longer. It might no longer be shaving sharp, but it will be sharp enough to do utilitarian tasks for a long time. I usually prefer my pocket knives at that level of sharpness anyway, as I'm much less likely to cut myself. There is a reason that S30v has been mostly replaced by M390 and 20CV in knives in the $125-$200 range. They usually get better edge retention when done well.

  • @King88_8
    @King88_83 жыл бұрын

    Blade gurus (ie those who own a keyboard, subscribe to a forum and own a knife ) will be spitting venom/losing their minds over this... On point real world test 👍🏼

  • @svn5994

    @svn5994

    Жыл бұрын

    Except Cedric & Ada along with plenty of other tests prove this wrong.

  • @King88_8

    @King88_8

    Жыл бұрын

    @@svn5994 Pete cuts the board about as much as he cut rope but as the poster says. 1 test cant be compared to another. We knock down a shipping container of boxes. Most of us use 8cr or 14c28 blades. Why? Because we can strop it right there on the side of the container and keep going. Probably cut more in that 1 day than most cut into their lives. D2 has become more popular for us now

  • @gungnir722
    @gungnir7224 ай бұрын

    i would like to see more of these

  • @faverodefavero
    @faverodefavero6 жыл бұрын

    You should make a website and sell knives you make. Also, try water quenching and forging, just a suggestion. Keep the great videos, anyways.

  • @Dirkietje8
    @Dirkietje82 жыл бұрын

    So about why rope is abrasive I can only speculate: I did some looking into natural fibers and rope making for my chemistry study since school had a focus on green chemistry. Most natural materials possess some silicates, this is what makes a plain leather strop work, just as a paint stirrer stick works. The small silicates are in a matrix of cellulose/lignin or skin cells and I would guess the same is true for the silicates still present in the sisal fibers. Now, I'm actually not quite sure if and why synthetic fibers would also be abrasive, that's a good different test sisal vs paracord. EDIT: looked it up. Leather has 0,5 micron silicates in it, and natural fibers can also contain quite a big amount of inorganic materials, some sodium/potassium carbonate/bicarbonate but also significant amounts of silica depending on the plant. EDIT2: Sisal and Manilla Hemp hover between 0,6-1,0% Ash content and about 1% 'others', the ash is mostly the carbonates which are about 2,5 Mohs hardness. But the 'others' category is where your silicates would be located in. The consistency between ropes and even between sections of the same rope will not be controlled for and therefore will introduce a variable as you elaborated on. Actual laboratory testing of knife edges is done with calibrated paper booklets with calibrated amounts of a calibrated grain of sand in between using a calibrated machine. Very expensive stuff. You and Cedric both do an amazing job in workshop science because honestly you guys' results translate better to the real world and most tests are only relative inside of its sample size, extrapolation of data like this is much harder.

  • @billpohlman803
    @billpohlman8034 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video! I was waiting for you to run out of hair to shave-lol

  • @aaronhelmsman
    @aaronhelmsman6 жыл бұрын

    What if you made a jig to do cutting? Something to guide your hand in the motion, not to do the actual cutting. Just a thought. This series is very interesting to me even if you're done with it now

  • @jimm3267
    @jimm32673 жыл бұрын

    The sisal rope industry thanks you for testing their product.

  • @casper9256
    @casper925611 ай бұрын

    Fron your other videos and rhe opinions in these commenrs. if i have to make thousands of cuts and sharpen away a knife to nothing to say its so close it could just be human error is the only difference that makes one knife better than the other in edge retention i would call it definitive enough. ( thankfully you did the worst part of the job for us). Heat treat on a lower end steel levels the playing field. Great video thanks for your meticulous testing.

  • @viewatyourownrisk
    @viewatyourownrisk2 жыл бұрын

    It seems that the lesson on this would be that both blades are going to retain an edge well enough that a little edge maintenance is going to keep the knife usably sharp for a long time. By maintenance, I mean stropping occassinally as the edge shows that it needs a touch up.

  • @profesorEDC
    @profesorEDC4 жыл бұрын

    Great vid Alex! Thank you for the effort and demonstration. Very interesting results, maybe we should just demand more QC as consumers and maybe someone should sew these companies that are selling us lies.

  • @PaulK390S90V
    @PaulK390S90V5 жыл бұрын

    Oh ya and manilla is harder to cut too! I found some tests online where they did tests on how much it took to cut through it and manilla takes more. If I remember right

  • @Darndiddlyarn
    @Darndiddlyarn3 жыл бұрын

    So far my favorite knife has an N690 blade, super easy to sharpen.

  • @me2bfc
    @me2bfc4 жыл бұрын

    There was a knifemaker from New Zealand that tested a knife made from 304 stainless, not even a hardenable steel, let alone a knife steel. Edge holding was pretty impressive. He was on KZread, but he got out of the trade.

Келесі