Great test as always! Thank you Sir, I love your work man!

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

I really appreciate that brother

can i attach mjolnir antennas to dji o3 air unit? is there a compatible slot for it

awesome test!👏

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

thx bro

Nice test! Will you redo the test with Goggles 2 when Maple comes out with upgraded antennas (it's in the work!), along with TrueRC and stock antenna? Thank you

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

If DJI gifts me a set haha, I don't have them

i have a few 03 units broke 1 antennae had some vista antennae's laying around the 2 vista's are alot better

O3 uses mimo so ideally you want orthogonal linear 2x2... the stock lollipop is using this internally (bot smashed his demo open and I saw it) which works great with the stock v2 antennas. What you need to try is cross-linear patches on the goggles faceplate (like the one internal to the g2). It's interesting that the left-right circular polarized work so well with the stock linear antennas on the V2 goggles, I imagine because it was actually able to operate in 2x2 again much like orthogonal linear antennas would... Very cool and interesting. I'm using stock again for good omni performance but that makes me think about the next build, I have options on the drone now. ❤

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Yeah that would make total sense. I could do a long range test but I feel it is not necessary. To me it is obvious the Mjolnir pro would out perform the stock nubbies

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

But if it uses mimo then don't you need a special antenna for the googles?

@clarkjamesdigital

Жыл бұрын

what about something like the truerc duality/singularity, omni directional but a lower profile than the stock antenna

id have liked to see you using something like a lhcp patch and lhcp antennas on the goggles and both lhcp on the goggles aswell as both rhcp on the goggles and your contraption? overall nice test i can imagine it helping alot of people out but not me today im sorry:(

Star gazer company ripped off your mecha roach build design. Looks so similar to your 3D printed quad.

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Ha, if people want to waste there money I cannot stop them

@marcoreviews

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe the problem is the device is very kid friendly and well designed. Ready to run even and in collaboration with fat shark 🦈. It will sell well and is better than the Emax competitor for beginners. The company really did a slam dunk but sadly the problem is they won’t send you any money for coming up with the idea they based it off of.

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@marcoreviews im not bothered, looking good does not mean well designed... customers are going to have to get better educated on what a good drone actually is or they will continue to get taken advantage of

@marcoreviews

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe I agree! Just happy you are making it! TikTok revoked my livestream capabilities today for not breaking the rules just like KZread keeps muting my audio on videos much on the same way… it is bothersome working on social media. Little bit concerned if TikTok gets banned in the USA 🇺🇸. Was finally gaining traction on there.

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@marcoreviews it is a slog for sure!

Hey on the O3 unit, which side is the left polar and right polar?

@VoladorMagic

4 ай бұрын

Its linear bro. Bardwell confirm

So, how would this fare? an LHCP+ RHCP on the O3 unit, axii 2 hd setup on v2 goggles? (2 patches, 2 stubbies)

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

From my findings I would say that would be awesome

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Mostly it seems buy good quality antennas and you will be good to go

@JThemelis

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe cool! Good to know! I’m using the o3 on a 3” build, fairly confident that the stock ant is OK for my purposes, but in the future, should i get another or need to replcace the antenna, i know what to do… thanks for your response!

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@JThemelis honestly unless you are pushing the limit, from my tests I would say the stock is good enough

Hi did you connect 1 or two of these aftermarket antennas?

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

2

I would really like to see this video with the new goggles 2, and see who is beter the goggles v2 or goggles 2

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

If only DJI would pay for one haha

👊👊😎👌

I know my vista antennas don't fit my 03, how do you know which ones fit?

@33rdframe

10 ай бұрын

Indeed the vista antennas do fit Ipex mmcx

@FlydreamMedia

10 ай бұрын

@@33rdframe so I need to get an adapter like a male ipex to female mmcx?

@33rdframe

10 ай бұрын

@@FlydreamMedia the connector on the vista is the same as the connector on the O3. Only the O3 has 2 antenna

@FlydreamMedia

10 ай бұрын

@drquadsfpv I tried today and it didn't fit. Do I need to just push harder?

@33rdframe

10 ай бұрын

@@FlydreamMedia you are talking about the caddx vista right? If so yes, it 100% is the same connector

+1👍 💪

Trust your equipment to the next level.

rush cherry better than o3 stock antenna right?

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Not so much

I tried some TrueRC matchsticks at 115mm at ground level on the car, but I wasn't too sure about the putting two LHCP's on there, and leaving 2 stock omnis on the V2's as well as an LHCP iFlight patch. In the end I noticed, by doing the exact same obstructed runs, I felt like the stock antennas were either better or about equal. I just went back to all stock since it has the lowest form factor. I figure DJI probably knows what they are doing, and would be wasting their time releasing stuff with garbage antennas. For example, I could drive around a building and put about 350ft of it between me and the car til the point the signal would be down to about 1.5mbps or so and video would not freeze. Using the upgraded and longer antennas it would freeze and do it earlier.

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Driving is a different beast from FPV because you get a whole lot of bounce signal. So that is why you saw the gains from the omnis, the stock antennas on the O3 is light-years better than the previous air units antenna. However, saying "they wouldn't waste their time releasing garbage" makes me thing you havnt been paying attention to what kind of company DJI is, lol They are the apple of drones, they are smart enough to make things good where marketing will be kind and avoid negative reviews, but the deeper you look you start to see a cardboard cake. They DO know what they are doing and find ways to cut corners every single place they can. But mostly iflight patches are very bad and patches in general probably are not good for the kind of situations FPV cars would put you in. I would look into the truerc nubbies for FPV car

@Magneticitist

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe The TrueRC's are what I was recommended before also but I didn't notice any improvement with them... but I was also not real sure which to get. Having them sit as low as possible to the ground seems counterintuitive but it seems to work for the DJI stock omnis. Two truerc LHCP's didn't help at all with the LHCP patch and looking dead at where I was driving (on other side of a building). I never noticed any improvement. I just figure DJI has needed to keep a competitive edge as being "the best" when it comes to the quality or reliability someone can get digital, and I feel like it would be a pointless task if their antennas just weren't going to work well (on the O3 which is supposed to be their best).

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@Magneticitist given that they sit so low to the ground you probably should have gotten one rhcp and one lhcp.

@Magneticitist

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe lol yea that's the thing about those 4 dual polarized stock deals. So many possible variants to test. I figured on the ground just getting good antennas as high as possible would be the idea.. which in that case just extended leads on the stock antennas would be nice.

More entertaining than scientific but fun to watch none the less.

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

I mean it is more consistent than most tests done on KZread

@Eroc556

Жыл бұрын

@gregdavidd Well where is YOUR test…. Didnt see anything on YOUR channel…… hummmmmm

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@Eroc556 hmmmmmm 🤣

@Eroc556

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 just stating facts lol

The amd cooler 🗿

interesting would be to see how G2 would perform

@33rdframe

10 ай бұрын

I don't have them unfortunately

This is you used LHCP or RHCP?

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

both

@hombredelfuturo_888

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe thanks, so do you recommend the foxeers over the standart dji dual antenna?

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@hombredelfuturo_888 yes, they are amazing

This test is valid only v2 goggles

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

Possibly

@rakinye8843

Жыл бұрын

How about goggles2 ?

Saw this video and bought a pair of Foxeer LH lollipop 4+, range is far far worse than the stock DJI antenna

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

You gotta be doing something wrong, or your antenna are damaged. Because I flew today in a factory and was blown away by the distance an penetration.

@fpvbersila4524

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe like what could I be doing wrong? is there settings when switching from stock to 4+?

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@fpvbersila4524 no settings, but there could be a malfunction in installation, or maybe even a damaged ufl connector. Or like I said it could be your antenna were damaged or defective outside if your doing. (As a side note, what faceplate antenna are you running? Googles 2 or v2?)

@fpvbersila4524

Жыл бұрын

@@33rdframe goggles 2

@33rdframe

Жыл бұрын

@@fpvbersila4524given that none of the other things mentioned are wrong it could be concluded that something is incomparable with the foxeer and the Googles V3. As you saw in the video I only have the googles v2 which is what I tested everything with