The UFO fighter jet - I 2000
Enjoy 10% OFF on all Hoverpens and free shipping to most countries with code FOUND:
North America & other countries: bit.ly/found_novium
UK & Europe: bit.ly/found_noviumeu
Merch Store!
www.foundandexplained.shop
NEW CHANNEL:
• Launched from the bigg...
Discord: / discord
My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
Patreon:
/ foundandexplained
Пікірлер: 423
Alright, who mashed up my f-22 and f-18 kits
@philippey4918
Ай бұрын
That's exactly what I thought too
@pramusetyakanca1552
Ай бұрын
Some Russian transfer student to my right. He's pretty good tho, I'mma admit XD
@RobloxiaIntlAerospaceGroup
Ай бұрын
Fr bro
@connorlaurings6367
Ай бұрын
first thing I thought lol
@hungchau7064
Ай бұрын
THICC F-18 I called it
Its like an f18 and an f22 had a baby
@user-bu3zz2po6n
Ай бұрын
That has missing chromosomes
@427Cabriolet
Күн бұрын
@@user-bu3zz2po6n an extra chromie probably
It's a thicccc F-18.
@xavvin
Ай бұрын
F-18 combined with an F-22
@JZsBFF
Ай бұрын
A stealth pancake? Sounds better than flying saucer.
He should have chosen to migrate to Iran. Maybe he would have made an actually good concept of the Qaher-313 that entered production.
@bigblue6917
Ай бұрын
That's one thought. But I had wondered if China would not have been a better choice. They've been trying to breakaway from Russia's offering so they may have been more open to his ideas'
@xkavarsmith9322
Ай бұрын
Reportedly Iran went from begging Russia for the Su-35, which would significantly improve their air force, to telling Russia "eh, we can build our own airframes". I wonder if they got hold of this guy's designs.
@Minh-Tran-04
Ай бұрын
@@xkavarsmith9322 Well, the big problem of Iran isn’t the airframe, they can make an 3rd gen airframe. It’s about building the engines and avionics that makes Su-35 the difference.
@simplementepersona
Ай бұрын
Poor dude would probably just had been killed by some Israeli spy...
@zulualpha3551
Ай бұрын
Yes, Shafaq makes more sense than Qaher-313
I'm confused lol - "In the Soviet Union it beat all competition".... yet it was designed largely in the late 90's/early 2000s when the USSR no longer existed.. and was only a paper concept that never actually flew?
'I 2000' is such a nineties name. It only could get more nineties and call it the 'X-2000'.
@Gunni1972
Ай бұрын
Knight Industries Two Thousand
THICC BOI, LOOKS LIKE THE X-32,J-20 AND SU-57 HAS A NEW CHALLENGER IN TERMS OF THICCNESS
@RuskiBear57
Ай бұрын
Gyatt
Time for another video bout a batshit crazy lookin plane again from found and explained
@bigblue6917
Ай бұрын
Well if you want a batshit crazy looking plane this is the place to be. Let them others do the boring normal ones
@DedMan28
Ай бұрын
Kerbal Space Program players be like: "Write that down, write that down~!"
*IVAN, DID YOU EXCLUDE PHYSICS FROM THE DESIGN AGAIN?!*
@ivankrylov6270
Ай бұрын
DA
@vinniepeterss
Ай бұрын
😅😅
@bigblue6917
Ай бұрын
Physics. Isn't that about putting all them bubbles in your coke.
@Gunni1972
Ай бұрын
@@bigblue6917 That's Fizzix.according to PR-language.
@ayuchanayuko
Ай бұрын
Da. American capitalist fysiks no good. My design use _superior_ *soviet* *_revolutionary_* fysiks!
The Avrocar was a hovercraft. It didn't have wings, it just "flew" via directed thrust. I believe there were ideas to develop it into a lifting body, probably not too dissimilar from the Flying Flapjack, but the real-life prototypes never got that far.
Remember, it only counts IF THEY BUILT IT
@ShadowDocks
Ай бұрын
If that's the case you're watching the wrong channel...
@uingaeoc3905
Ай бұрын
Even then the design has to do what 'it says on the tin', they don't.
@Jedi.Toby.M
Ай бұрын
Off topic but...the film series 007 actually built most of what you see on screen...so what's Russia actually doing?! I mean when MGM can build a better anything as a working set piece than Russia has made ever kinda says it all.
@holodeckdetmold4824
Ай бұрын
🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@ShadowDocks
Ай бұрын
@@Jedi.Toby.M Oh great you're one of those people that Just can't stand the fact Russia can make good weapons and before you say anything may I remind you of, The Kalashnikov family of Rifles Mosin Negant M1891 T-34 Medium tank T-72 series of Main Battle tanks SU-100 and Isu-152 tank Destroyers The Mil Mi-8 and Mi-24 family of Helicopters Sukhoi SU-25 MiG-21 The BMP and BTR families of Armored Fighting Vehicle's Ks-23 6 Gauge Shotgun And at least several other's
3:51 - big mistake in the model here. The Flying Pancake had counter rotating props, with the prop tips moving outwards at the top. The generated propwash was intended to counteract the HUGE amount of tip vortex generated by the very low aspect ratio wing with its huge tip spillage.
What a beautiful design. It's a genuine mix of art and sciences producing such and interesting silhouette. It's the sort of thing that looks like sci-fi but could actually exist in the realm of reality. Perhaps it could find a place in flight sims like the Ace Combat series.
F-22: you F-18 wanna netflix and chill?
@icommitwarcrime2239
Ай бұрын
Netflix : Are you still watching? Some random kid getting over it with someone else :
If there's any merit to this design, then this just proves that innovation is _wasted_ on the Russian system
@WolfeSaber9933
Ай бұрын
Any communist system basically destroys innovation.
@bigblue6917
Ай бұрын
When it comes to aircraft Russia never quite gets a handle on it.
@KrokLP
Ай бұрын
It was an awful time in Russia. The designer of the Strike One pistol for example had to flee Russia after he refused to bribe half the administration to have his design accepted as the new pistol for the Russian police.
@616CC
Ай бұрын
@@bigblue6917Russian aircraft look fantastic though, they seem to export a lot of them?
@joserafaelgarciamorales8724
Ай бұрын
Never underestimate your opponents 🇷🇺🇺🇸
So whenever a new plane design appeared, he simply drew a circle using a compass...
Looks like something produced when designers got told to maximize radar signature. Looks like the best dogfighter in the age of beyond visual range missiles.
Dear Nick. This comment is off topic to the video: I would like to point your attention to the German designer Luigi Colani, who designed several planes, within that the Megalodon superplane with four levels and a hypersonic design. I would appreciate if you could make some videos of those concepts. Thanks in advance
Beautiful video, editing must have taken a lot of time. Good work.
I feel like this design does not like high speeds
I swear, why do I get memories of that one jet in GTA5, where they mashed up an F-16 and F-18?☠️
Several things are missing. Did the designer have an aero engineering degree? Were any wind tunnel tests done of reasonably size models? Had the designer a history of creating any other aircraft and were they successful? I suspect the answer to all these questions is no and that is the reason the aircraft never went anyplace.
@TeamDoc312
Ай бұрын
It's because it was a stolen design from Testors plastic model ftom the 80s. It's just more stylized.
I assume the word Shafak means the same as Şafak (same pronunciation) in the Turkish language as Persian and Turkish share quite a few words. If so Şafak/Shafak means Dawn/First Light of the day. The project itself seems very interesting. Can't wait to see the civil aviation story of Mr. Mohammedov.
Lol, the ICM MiG-29 kit as a prop. I died.
He knew he needed to base his aircraft on a "flight proven" design... so choosing the large rotating disc, present on American AWACS aircraft, was the obvious choice.
@ddegn
Ай бұрын
Those AWACS were biplanes, right? /s
Well you see, kids, when an f-18 and f-22 love each very much... the f-18 extends his refueling probe...then, um.. you know, thingy
@RaymondHatton-do4dp
Ай бұрын
Ok that's funny. I laughed at this.
@ivanlom5948
Ай бұрын
Lmfaoooo the f18 also sometimes has an arresting hook below the engines lol
@Gunni1972
Ай бұрын
...The After Burns.
@yayeetmeoffacliff4708
Ай бұрын
@@ivanlom5948ALWAYS, not sometimes. It's there the entire time.
Dear Nick.😮 Would appreciate to see a video about disk wings/round wings as shown in this video. (Not to be confused with the already shown ring wings).
flying saucers do not use aerodynamics for propulsion, but the propulsion field that surrounds the saucer shaped platform does move the atmosphere around it.
Just gotta say i like the clutter on tha digital desk, as well as all your animations and these "rooms" you make
It sounds like he just saw the coolest thing on the market and slapped a small circle wing on it
It's a pity none of these were built even as a testbed to see how well the concept worked.
Never heard of it. Closest was the Mig-37(?) Ferret and the MIG/SUKHOI LFI & Etc programs… I love the Mig-1.44.
Rounded shapes like that must make quite a big spot on radar..
If you want a good and cheap lightning effect done in Blender (I suppose this is the program you are using), get a cube, principled volume shader, musgrave texture multiplied and plugged into density till it looks likea cloud, put a point light at the bottom part, slightly inside, and it should look like a light from within the cloud. With good lighting conditions it looks really great when you make the lamp blue and make it just vibrate with light now and than (which can be automated using noise and Limits modifiers)
Great vid!!!
That design looks a lot better than the own as you 57 and the sukoy jets
14:30 amazing fighter jet design ... nice video
I love these videos
It's an intriguing concept ...
Best video yet
it reminds me with some sort of Airplane toy 😅
@TeamDoc312
Ай бұрын
It's based off a plastic Testors scale model from the 80s.
@yayeetmeoffacliff4708
Ай бұрын
@@TeamDoc312which one?
few of the aircraft does have circular shapes between hull and wing. not so extreme as this one but its not so new either
Saw the Darkstar on the Top Gun movie and thought it was real like the Chinese did and got working 😂
can you make a video about the saab J41 vampyren or the saab j38 vargen
Guy looks at F22 and F18 and goes …hmmmm🤔
great video
Do you know the name for the Soviet concrete monorail project? Or is it not named
Wow really unique design
The hover pen looks like another "kamikoto knives" scam
The nearest you'll get to watching two planes having a baby together, an F-18 with an F-22.
The science fiction franchise Battletech has a couple of aerospace fighters with circular wing designs. They are described as unstable in atmospheric flight, so they are confined to space operations only.
it looks like the F-22+F-18+FAXX
This is the definition of having a great idea and sticking with it... but not really since Russia will just pick the one contractor who pays them the most rubles and does everything free lmao
i2000 reporting name "flapjack" probably
do you have any tutorials on your process for making these videos?
This channel is the epitome of 'bruh'
I’m not gonna lie… that sponsorship had me hooked
It's actually not unlike any other fighter. There were fighter designs like that in WW2. Pancake something? I forget.
Russia always said no to good planes.
I really like this design, it's very cute
Ive seen this as a plastic model with the wings splitting and forming an x from the top view. The designer seems like "Tesla" but for military aircraft.
Realy I like this powerful fighters jets
Cool bird!
Hmm.. wouldn't the circular root of the wing cause instability and create unnecessary drag? I feel like it would be wildly inefficient for a military plane, that being said, i cant help but like the way the later designs looked with the wings swept more rearward so i say the design has some merit. Too bad it'll probably never be built. 😕
i defo wanna see his other civilian designs ^^
nice!
This is a very interesting cool fighter jet! Why didn’t the United States go, and recruit this guy?
Doa video on the WW2 YB-40 its a crazy B-17
Looks like Russia tried to make an F22/18 Raptor Hornet.
So, they ignored his designs - not once, but multiple times... then they went "You work for us, or you work for nobody..." and then proceeded to ignore them again? They obviously didn't (and still don't) know what they want - or when they just _may_ have _possibly_ a god idea on their hands... and that's exactly the mindset that ultimatively lost them the friggin' Cold War... and it still prevails to this day...
F-18+F-22= what ever this thing is
@lolka359
Ай бұрын
2F-40?????
RIP Mr.Mohamadov
Is this the plane that was designed alongside the MFI aka the 1.44.
All those paper projects are really UFOs - Unpossible Flying Objects 😁🤘
If F22 Mating with F18 hornet:
Expanded version of mig 35?
@Andrew-hf31mq
Ай бұрын
i guess
Minor annoyance 4:00 - You show a Vought F-8 Crusader when mentioning fly-by-wire. The F-8 Crusader did not use fly-by-wire. A _single_ F-8 Crusader was modified by NASA as a fly-by-wire testbed. If you're going to use an F-8 as an example for it, you should at least use the exact one that was used to test digital fly-by-wire. The F-16 was the first production aircraft to use digital fly-by-wire.
the storytelling aspect of this video is on another level compared to your previous videos absolutely inceredible
Wow! Nice!
if it can fly sideways and reverse at similar mach speeds then that’s impressive.
Look at the SU-57. Now look at the Mig i2000. Looks strangely familiar.
Fascinating, thank you.
If the concept was that good, someone would have implemented it. But this form is unstable and will not allow you to develop high speed.
I've never ever ever ever seen that actually.
13:25 The f35 isn't designed for high cruise speeds. Its engines specifically switch over to extremely high fuel efficiency during cruise, which gives it more range. Its designed for higher thrust during combat, which is what you actually need. Almost anything can have a "higher cruise speed/max speed" than the f35, because cruise speed/max speed is irrelevant in modern air fighting doctrine and the F35 isnt designed for it. A total of ~3 seconds of air combat ever was at these speeds. Everyone boasts about being "faster than the f35" while the f35 is snickering at how dated your air combat doctrine is.
if i remember correctly the plane that gaslighted the world that led to the creation of the actual dominator called F-14 Tomcat was one of their ( Russian ) ones want it ( Feel like the history is about repeat itself tbh )
Can you deep dive into the ongoing UFO situation ?
Round wings would stop induced dutch rolls over swept wings
I uh.. H'okay this might be a bad take, but is this not just a slightly modified version o--- Oh okay the Aermacchi/Yakovlev trainer picture just showed up. Nevermind.
@Gunni1972
Ай бұрын
Yes, the Design is so much Yak130, it pains me to hear, it was not done by him.
“like all stories it started in the 60’s”
So the 'designer' riffed on contemporary US fighter design forms and then attributed totally unrelated capabilities to it. I'm certain he also has designs for a flying aircraft carrier and a hovertank somewhere under his desk.
I hope one another country like india, China, north korea or iran use his design and make it better for their respective air force! This is really cool jet but sad to see it not getting a chance!😢
I had a plan for invincible figher jet , 7th generation, it runs with water, it can go around the world 5 times non stop, it could carry nukes and other missiles, two passangers, built in toilet shower and small kitchen, it cant be detected or even could see once it goes up there, i never built it, so does it matter? I meant all my designs and plans for my invisible figher jet 😂
realley truu storrey! )))
The Red Raptor.
@ShadowDocks
Ай бұрын
I'm gonna use this name now
@JZsBFF
Ай бұрын
Cool!
Russia literally said use addition f22+f18+su57+"y"f23+f14
Its like the flying pancake of the 40s with small wings and a tail
Hey this was in airforce delta
Paper planes beat every other one in imagination.
damn it! vought makes jets to!? 3:47