Always best to remember that sea levels were 120 metres lower during the last glacial maximum.

@SafeEffective-ls2pl

2 ай бұрын

10,000 years ago Humans were thought to still be living in caves.

@bobharmes343

2 ай бұрын

@@SafeEffective-ls2pl except for Gobekli Tepe, then?

@lahaina4791

Ай бұрын

Post Flood the so-called ice age occured lowering sea levels 130 meters about 2000 B.C.E. Great temples were built honoring the Ark and the mountain of it's landing. This is why temples are built on mounts so often. The first temple based on this thought is at Babel. The base is still there.

The rocks could be natural, but that doesn't mean man didn't carve them flatter and cut stairways. A few of the above water formations may of been shaped too, though the stone may of remained in place or did not move far. Like saying mount Rushmore is a mountain, no one built it, it just looks like faces, and that's correct, but built and carved are very different things.

@williamfarnaby

Жыл бұрын

how about they they were built on land and sink many many many thousands of yeas ago?

Could it be that it was a quarry site before in the ancient past?

@kuratr

11 ай бұрын

Yeah that's what I was thinking. It has the typical look of a quarry but these people like to jump to conclusions about ancient temples, aliens and other bullcrap.

@TonyTrupp

2 ай бұрын

There are no quarry tooling marks

It looks like a quarry. I have seen old Roman quarries and they look like this. But this looks like bigger.

@Fisch2k4

Жыл бұрын

yes. the rockformations above sea level also dont have nearly the same amount of symmetry. its pretty obviously an old quarry. sea levels used to be far lower.

@benadrylcumbersplatch6448

Жыл бұрын

Makes sense, but now we gotta find what they were using all that stone for 🐒

@TonyTrupp

2 ай бұрын

There are no quarry tooling marks though 🤷‍♂️

@TheNera2010

2 ай бұрын

@@TonyTrupp I don't know if you say this as a result of having the knowledge of an examination on these rocks but it's hard to find evidences after all those years and erosion. I made just a guess. I can't insist on it.

@ivayloivanov3744

15 күн бұрын

With all the debates no one made the assumption that this is not a monument, but a stone quarry.

There are plenty of straight lines in nature however I've never seen or heard of stairs or same height width step formations. Has the area been mapped, seems an obvious "step" to make.

It would be more surprising not finding lost cities of Japan. More and more underwater settlements have been found each passing year. Human history outside Africa now dates back almost 400k years. We know nothing. The formations on land don't show numerous staircase futures. This one shows many of them. I don't know that it's man-made but dismissing that idea seems sill just because there are flat rocks also on land.

@ArohaStill

4 ай бұрын

Out of India, backed by DNA look it up

Come on. I don't believe that waves cut corners like that.

@mrtiger4u2c

4 ай бұрын

And I'm 100% with you on that.

@TonyTrupp

2 ай бұрын

The waves didn’t cut those sharp corners. Rather it was the flat layered geology just fracturing into sharp edges.

Thanks so much for the video and info.

this could be an ancient quarry. it looks very similar to ones in Egypt, so man made but not a temple or city ruins. it would explain why one side is more chopped up then the other. if it is a quarry, where are the stones it provided????

Perhaps some group near the end of the Ice Age carved out these structures. During the Ice Age, the ocean was on average about 300 feet shallower than it is today. The Yonaguni Monument is about 100ft underwater.

@edwardg7323

Жыл бұрын

Good point. You are forgetting about the Younger Dryas impact about 13K years ago. The Global ccean levels were shifted about 300*400 ft. Which would haved made this site a coastal beach palace. The Berullium-10 dating method used for quoting the age of this structure to about 3000 years ago is flawed. Granite is a hard, crystalline rock that is relatively resistant to weathering and chemical alteration. However, even granite can be affected by long-term submersion in ionized salt water. Here's how the Beryllium-10 (10Be) levels might be affected: Leaching: While granite is less porous than many other rock types, it's not completely impervious to water. Over thousands of years, ionized salt water could potentially leach some 10Be out of the granite. Shielding from Cosmic Rays: As mentioned earlier, while the granite is submerged, it would be shielded from cosmic rays, which are the source of atmospheric 10Be. This would prevent any additional 10Be from being added to the granite during the time it is submerged. Decay: 10Be is radioactive and decays with a half-life of about 1.4 million years. Over a few thousand years, a small amount of the 10Be in the granite would decay, but this effect would be relatively minor compared to the effects of leaching and shielding. Physical Erosion: Depending on the conditions, physical erosion could also play a role. If the granite is in an environment with strong currents or abrasive sediment, it could be physically worn down over time, which could remove surface layers containing 10Be. While granite is relatively resistant to leaching and erosion, long-term submersion in ionized salt water could still potentially affect the 10Be concentration in the granite. This could make the granite appear YOUNGER than it actually is when dated using 10Be.

@Galbex21

5 ай бұрын

No. It would be fantastic but you need more proof to make a claim that is man made.

Maybe these scientists have forgotten how artists work. You have naturally created structures that you use to make man made structures. eg. Khasneh (´Treasury´) at Petra. Jordan, Leshan Giant Buddha in China, Kailasa Temple in India, Lalibela in Ethiopia, Abu Simbel in Egypt etc It’s so obvious. The Japanese can’t be the only advanced culture without monolithic structures made from natural formations. And tool markings etc would have been washed away if this thing was made in 300 CE

@BigTrees4ever

10 ай бұрын

There’s no confirmation that any of those places are truly carved out of the natural formations, that’s just a hypothesis put forward by some researchers, with no evidence other than the fact that it appears to be a singular piece. When looking closer at many of the places you listed and comparing them to actual architecture worldwide, you see that the style of building is the same, down to the patterns in the ceilings at certain points. Look at any of those places with the idea that something happened to fuse everything together and it will make infinitely more sense to you.

hi have dived this site about 12 years ago the place is amazing the currents might strong though you swim through the tunnel and come up on to the flat part then to the steps amazing

@brym4467

11 ай бұрын

what did you think? man made or natural.

That was carved from the bedrock just like some of the other ancient sites. That was definitely man-made from the bedrock.

@adamgrimsley2900

5 ай бұрын

Definitely?

japan never stops fascinating guys

Still amazing

Seem like they don't want us to know that it's man made

Have to go see this soon!!!!

This reminded me of Coin Locker Babies by Ryu Murakami (not Haruki Murakami). One of the characters searches of a destructive military grade substance under an island near Okinawa.

So the "truth" of these structures is that nobody really knows if they're natural or man made?

@jamesmcdonald9313

Жыл бұрын

no, they pretty much confirmed its natural.

@johankaruyan5536

Жыл бұрын

@@jamesmcdonald9313 what about the random dude in the comment section who said this ? "Although not shown in the video, there are in fact ruins shaped like a pavilion made of stone and objects like a sphinx lying on its side at this site. The logic of natural formation is absurd"

@jimmyshousevideos

Жыл бұрын

@@johankaruyan5536 ah yes, the most reliable source, random guy in the comments.

@capnjackgallows3204

Жыл бұрын

​@johankaruyan5536 to be fair he has said the exact same thing in every video regarding the structure, an exact copy and paste in fact

@johankaruyan5536

Жыл бұрын

@@capnjackgallows3204 ok

Looks like a quarry. Therefore, it looks somehow processed without making sense.

Its a quarry. The sea level was lower when that thing was in use. Its not mind blowing, these are around the world. There was a bad flood and the sea level rose. Many coastal cities went under. People are so daft to force themselves to think this is natural.

@bofpwet9500

6 ай бұрын

Dum

@jlock9085

2 ай бұрын

Facts

@lahaina4791

Ай бұрын

There were two floods. The Flood of Noah that changed Earth's climate, and the melting of the glaciation caused by the Flood.

After seeing what happened recently in the noto region of japan due to the 7.6 earthquake. That raised the sea floor 13 feet and exposed nearly 850 feet of new beaches along the coast and how active the area is.. I believe that underwater structure was once part of the natural landscape, fell into the ocean after a major earthquake. There has to be evidence of a major tsunami happening that can’t be explained because of it.

There's no way this place is naturally formed.

@bofpwet9500

6 ай бұрын

What else could have happened?

My personality think this is not a natural formation but an artificial one. The area where this topography is located was exposed on the surface in the 13th century, when the Gusuku era began. At that time, many castles were built in the Ryukyu Islands, and a lot of stone was needed. There are many remains of medieval stone quarries in the Ryukyu Islands. I believe these underwater ruins are former stone quarries that sank due to rising sea levels.

There's no way this is natural.

これ、発見された当時、結局自然に出来たものと’専門家’が言い張って、未だに自然に出来たもので人口物では無いと言う話に強引になりましたね。 今現在コロナについてテレビに出ている’専門家’がデタラメと言うか特定の利権団体を利する様な事しか言わないのを見ると元々そう言う事だったのが良くわかります。

Sad world

I think it’s the same tech used by the Egyptians to cut those stones

gotta start somewhere

i think it's similar to neolithic temples found in thailand and indonesia, but underwater. these temples are heavily influenced by buddhism. which is common religion in japan. actually it's make sense than trying to connect this archeological site to the "Atlantis"

Wow! Only 20 years after Graham Hancock's "Underworld"

Its not so clear cut, how about a natural structure thats been enhanced and changed by early humans?

That's where Aliens land their space ships.

Breathtaking structures. Are there any mythological stories or folklore in Japan redarding this place?

@keyljyehn6635

Жыл бұрын

Not that I know of. I didn't quite catch the datation of the structures in the video though. Depending of the ancient names of the place it is situated in, the foundating myths of the Kojiki and Nihon Shoki are worth reading

@bobbelcher678

Жыл бұрын

Nope, this thing is naturally formed I’m afraid

@Basedlocation

Жыл бұрын

Atlantis

@dou1201

Жыл бұрын

I have been reading some opinions said it might be the lost mu civilization

@donaldmacgregor2628

Жыл бұрын

@@bobbelcher678Doesn’t look natural at all, wdym?

It looks like a quarry, but the reason why the scientists not said it is that the japanese population who lived there in these area (Jomon people) only use wood for construction, so there is no quarry at this time in Japan.

what's bgm?

Will we ever know for sure.... maybe.... let's wait and see

Look at the "Millenium Falcon under the Baltic"

I agree with others that this is most certainly a quarry , it's obvious !

@jamescassaniti9694

Жыл бұрын

Why quarry there when the whole island is a giant rock?

@kathleennorton7913

7 ай бұрын

​@@jamescassaniti9694 Is it?

@bofpwet9500

6 ай бұрын

Like the others you are obviously dum then.

Why doesn't the BBC report on Europe's various megalithic architecture sites?

@youcanhandlethetruth4695

Жыл бұрын

All MSM is there to Fake History. Because there Owners depent on the BS History for there Power. With the Truth, all Religions are Falls, all there claims on Lands are falls. One example Egypt, not african not Arab, Whites Build it.

Wouldn't a 3D map of sorts give a better clue?

@Shlevel

Жыл бұрын

They’re not there yet lol

@kunalroy2712

Жыл бұрын

@@Shlevel 3D sonar?

@lahaina4791

Ай бұрын

There is a 3D mapping, look for it.

Look at the hexagonal shapes with flat surfaces, on of Coast Ireland. Just because something has geometric shapes with flat surfaces, does not mean that it is man-made. Nature makes geometric shapes all the time.

@robertdalomba2629

2 ай бұрын

Not stairs lol

Sea levels do rise. I wouldn’t be surprised if there is one.

Go watch the video of the structure I found on my page. It had animals carved out of stone before it was destroyed.

This was featured in a Wii game called Endless ocean, a late game area, where you encounter a whale to photograph.

Kaimanawa Wall New Zealand would be another great discovery the World would want to see.

I don't know why History Channel's "Ancient Aliens" got a better footage of the monument showing the staircases and better angles than BBC lmao...

@carlolapadula3953

21 күн бұрын

Harder to dismiss, especially when you want to contrast to somewhat symmetrical natural formation in order to make think nature could just happen to accidentally carve gigantic evenly spaced staircases. Not really all that puzzling that BBC chose this footage and not the other one.

Why just not look on the seabed floor or on formation for any carvings or writing also signs of human activity that was once active at the time and artifacts, instead of just swimming around and looking at the scale of it🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

@silverchords1277

Жыл бұрын

They did and there aren't any.

" "We should also consider the possibility that the Yonaguni Monument is fundamentally a natural structure that was utilized, enhanced, and modified by humans in ancient times."" This video misrepresents what Robert Schoch said about the structure and arguably should be considered a deception, but why?

@kathleennorton7913

7 ай бұрын

What did he actually say?

@bobharmes343

2 ай бұрын

it's the bbc, wouldn't expect anything else other then misrepresentation and deception

We've all got an Atlantis hidden somewhere deep in our souls

@Basedlocation

Жыл бұрын

Or another civ that rivaled

what?!!!🤩🤩🤩

The tomb of Himiko of Yamatai

It may have been a man made Tomb or outpost, then japan had a massive earthquake and fell into the sea.

it is said there exsisting a huge plain connect china korea japan and taiwan 30000 years ago

@gonyinga855

Жыл бұрын

base on the yellow river and yangtze river's paleo-channel

@gonyinga855

Жыл бұрын

soil won't sink into the sea soil dissolve into the sea water

has to be Man-made. these flat surfaces look like they were cut with precision.

I think they threw it in the ocean

I would love to see this as an old, man made, structure, but is completely natural, although rare, I think.

@mullahosk585

Жыл бұрын

Are there any other similiar examples?

@arcguardian

Жыл бұрын

@@mullahosk585 only man made ones lol.

@BigTrees4ever

10 ай бұрын

@@arcguardianthe “experts” pretty much said ”the joints in the rock, are natural, though we have no idea how they form, and we dismiss any other possibility for fear that we might be wrong.”

@zehsackett6132

5 ай бұрын

Give me a single example of naturally forming staircases and pyramids. Either "trust the experts" or trust your common sense.

"the truth" provided by the BBC...

I first discovered Yonaguni while surfing through a Tik Tok channel. 😝 🌊 🏄

Natural with same size steps???

Aliens did that.

The truth is....TAIWAN HAS BEEN #1 for millennia.

Some geological formations are very regular in appearance and thus look manmade.

What kind of natural erosion result in these shapes?

@dellcoc

Жыл бұрын

The imaginary kind of lazy archeologists. That structure was made.

@kathleennorton7913

7 ай бұрын

The land "formations" are all made up of many layers, like the Grand Canyon and many landscapes around the world. They don't appear granite like. These formations are supposed to be and appear granite like.

@mullahosk585

7 ай бұрын

@@kathleennorton7913 so what you are saying is that if this was a natural formation, we would see layers of different types of rocks ?

So, what's the truth?

It's not man made. It's mermaid made!

Neil de grasse tyson would say "it's a natural formation".

@bobharmes343

2 ай бұрын

he would, as he's a grifter

So no 'truth' actually appears, just the usual conjecture.

@rickstalentedtongue910

Жыл бұрын

You will never get truth on the apparatus of control known as the TV. Any mass media really.

The Giants' Causeway of Japan

Aliens and Giants.

Caused by shifts and explanations for small tsunamis and large ones but still kool

did the BBC get Marianna Sping to 'debunk' this? 🤣 Nature doesn't make steps

Maybe they were try to build a pyramid and then gave up, over time the ocean covered it.

Probably remnants of the civilization from 12,800 yrs ago b4 the comet impacts

That interviewee who mention someone else who believe that was man-made without any scientific research just straight up killing that person's scientific career

We’ve been searching the wrong location for all this time

It's probably a combination of both. Like the sphinx, when these rock formations weren't submerged, how could people NOT have taken advantage of these convenient platforms?

I guest people are still in denial about life here way before us and we'll never know what or who.... we can't ever be honest and say , yes, someone did this but we don't know who. We can't have the answer to everything. People aren't that dumb to think the water made that naturally. These people need another job if they really trying to convince someone of that. I love history and we shouldn't hide the truth

History Channel : this structure obviously aliens spacecraft crashlanded 673 quadrillion years ago

What is the point of being a Geologist if in today's day and age, they still don't know whether it is man made or natural lol. Notice the regular use of the word "believe" in this short video.

I am sure is not civilization of Japan but other nation when earthquake happen just place it in Japan

the oldest civilization is in Indonesia not in Japan.

@saymyname2417

10 ай бұрын

Whoever said that Japan was the oldest civilisation?

I don't know but since it can not be proved that its manmade, it must be natural. So where's the proof that its natural?

@alucardlord9032

Жыл бұрын

Havent you watched the video? There are similar land formations all around it

IT MUST BE BOTH: A MANIPULATED-BY-MAN NATURAL FORMATION

@rickstalentedtongue910

Жыл бұрын

Few can consider it is not either or, but very good.

it was the Aliens

Maybe both? Like carve stairs & walls in natural cliffs? So back when sea levels were lower, maybe people adjusted the natural formation to suit them? But like if you can't grasp straight lines in nature, look up Giant's causeway in northern Ireland!

Rare Earth channel had visited the island and debunked it. It's just simply a natural rock formations wihout any human touch. But the locals keep the legend/myth alive since that's the reason for the curious divers around the world will visit the place. It's all about locals' economy from the tourism.

????

It is part of the Ancient Planetary Energy Grid. Leylines. There are 12 Points, North and southpole. And the other go around 30° Line 5 in the South 5 In the North. You can cut the planet like a Football, a dodecahedron.

@PG-3462

Жыл бұрын

Yes and everything was made by the Illuminati Franc-Maçons, who turn out to be lizards 🙃

Looks natural to me.

@Dafboss

Жыл бұрын

Time to wake up. That’s sculpted by humans

Almost no footage of it lame AF.

To compare it to a natural rock formation and says it's the same is like degrading human cognitive observation, it is in fact man made.

There are similar rock formations which are natural just beside the sea but the conspiracy theorists have to say its man-made 🤷‍♂️

@raclark2730

Жыл бұрын

Yes that looks like it could be the case here when you look at the whole site. However there are still a lot of questions about other sites around the world. And entertaining the possibility of lost civilizations is not a conspiracy theory, who shot JFK ect, is a conspiracy theory. I think you are a little confused.

@torino3204

Жыл бұрын

its funny because, when something is not clearly man mande, they say is man made, but when something is super clearly man made, like the giza pyramids, it obviusly made by aliens xD

@raclark2730

Жыл бұрын

@@torino3204 I prefer previous age of humanity. As described by many our earliest civilizations themselves. Is that is conspiracy theory, then color me bad. 😱

@ljubicasmolcic7550

Жыл бұрын

@@torino3204 so you are saying that Egyptians built great pyramid? I don't believe in aliens but I belive in industrial civilization more than 15.000ya ago..

@ljubicasmolcic7550

Жыл бұрын

There is nothing even remotely similar beside the sea..can it be a quarry? More than 12.000ya ago?

Bad editing, had to make a choice between reading the subtitle or watching the sceneic video, the scenes were also changing too fast like a slide show. Would have preferred if they switched between showing a full-screen text overlapping the blurred video to give context and then just stick to showing just the video without any distractions.

@thelostone6981

Жыл бұрын

Watch it twice, I did.

why can't it be a mostly natural structure that was altered for use by humans?

@BigTrees4ever

10 ай бұрын

Because the academics can’t admit we aren’t the most evolved most technologically advanced we’ve ever been. It would hurt their world view. People in these fields no longer care about doing research or science, they care about protecting the official narrative at all costs.

@saymyname2417

10 ай бұрын

Because it isn't. That would be a lie.

@armadillo9961

10 ай бұрын

@@saymyname2417you dont know that

@saymyname2417

10 ай бұрын

@@armadillo9961 - I've watched a couple of videos and pictures of this site. The camera footage does not at all make it clear but when you see models and drawings of the who'e thing that's another story. This looks like a quarry to me but it may have been anything. That's what nobody can know anymore. But what is obvious especially from models and drawings is that this is a structure that was built / shaped by somebody. Whereas I stand corrected insofar as the oc may indeed be correct if this was a quarry. Because that would have originally been a natural structure altered by people.

@armadillo9961

10 ай бұрын

@@saymyname2417Agreed it looks manmade especially when you consider there are apparently many more along the coastline for about 4 miles. Quarry makes sense too, and it also resembles the ziggurat

Ao kbhi india.

There’s literally a pyramid with stairs down there why is no one posting that footage on this video ? It’s definitely man made

@kathleennorton7913

7 ай бұрын

The way this video is put together seems suspicious. Very fast with writing over much of it that is wanted to be seen clearly. I slowed it down to actually be able to evaluate it at all.

@bobharmes343

2 ай бұрын

@@kathleennorton7913 that's the BBC for ya!

As much as I hate to admit it, it's 99% sure to be a natural geological feature !

@rickstalentedtongue910

Жыл бұрын

The "experts" are lying, you can argue as to why. Nature doesn't work with straight lines, certainly not over and over.

@arcguardian

Жыл бұрын

U can't admit what u don't know.

100% Man made. Just a tiny part of ancient relics all over the world.

...can't you get someone to narrate in english? How can I see what you're trying to show me in the video if I have to read ?