Keep fighting people! 💪💪💪

You guys are amazing. Thanks so much 🤘

Keep up the good work, you'll soon be mainstream....

I'm knackered and can't be arsed, but I will go on the march anyway as it's too important!

Thank you for all you do and for educating us on these further perversions of an already disturbing "legal" system. Truly terrifying. What a scary trajectory towards fa$cism!

On my way down to London now, see you at 12 on Park Lane

Unfortunately, I'm going to be out of the country during the march but will try and catch the live stream. I attended the Big One and that was a great event. Thanks for all of your work ⏳🌍❤

Love your video's, so informative, calm and at the same time forceful message

More than half of the comments have disappeared.

@glenwarrengeology

19 күн бұрын

AH CENSORSHIP 😅

@summess5567

15 күн бұрын

Were they the usual Fossil-Fuelled Bots and Trolls? If so - thank god for that!! We've all read their non-points too often before. Cheers.

@radscorpion8

12 күн бұрын

@@summess5567 its true, we run on fossil fuels

@summess5567

5 күн бұрын

@@radscorpion8 INdeed so. The 'Leave' scam distracted the British Public's attention from the Tory Policies declining standard of living and the mass selloff of our public utillities (water, NHS, Education, Trtansport, the Tax office itself) and redirecting it to a fear and hatred of refugees. Instead of voting to save the NHS and everything else in this country, the 'Leave' vote (and the offshore billionaires that funded it) ensured this country becomes a tax-free stop for cheap labour and dodgy deals for any corrupt organisation... and an end to the Natives (that's us) having any say in anything. The 'Phillipines of the North' in fact. Look! Blue Passports and a flag... but no laws to stop offshore finance using this place as a toilet and no rights to proterst about it. TGHis country was biught and sold - just as it was when the SAME thing happened in Canada and they ended up electing the 'Reform' party ... funded by the same offshore finance as MAGA and UKIP ... oh... and as ReformUK. Basically, we're heading to having a McParty in charge - an offshore franchise run by offshore finance, which has absolute control over the union-less workforce who work for survival rates to keep their offshore bosses rich. Bravo, People Of Britain informed by the papers owned by the people who fund this 'Worker-hating Nationalism' stuff.

What is the assessment report your speaking about? Is it possible to have a link ?

This thought crime model of guilt through association etc is very similar to the way that Starmer has purged the Labour party of left wingers, so I can easily see him taking the baton from the Tories in the direction of draconian clamp down on protest.

Arctic methane is coming for us.

Hey! 😮 I thought Trudi Said that the Attorney General Dropped the charges?? Also if parliament has been dissolved, wont there be a new Attorney General?? So she actually won the case the courts were in Favour 😳 Do you know i have done loads on this?? Trudi actually said the Charges were dropped. So..... The Jurors are "supposed to know those rights" regardless of what law the prosecutor and Defence raise. Because the rights are separate from plea. The rights are not plea based. Also, petitioning IS covered by parliament privileges so its shouldnt have been in the court anyway and as you are opposing parliament, the Attorney General is not supposed to be taking any side. In a case that already exists the XR actions in the first place.... The Prosecutions were illegal. Hmmmm have you not seen my page yet with all the research and updates of law???

The Mycelium will still be here... It sure sounds like the MAGA court isn't the only group pushing authoritarian values.

$38 billion of inaction costs by 2050. This is exactly what Disaster Capitalists want. The inequity that will flow from NOT moving to a war footing on the climate catastrophe is incomprehensibly huge and can never ever been undone. #ActNow

I really am at a loss now, maybe i have been striving of my own egoistic urge to see change, now at least ime in a position where i can admit i dont have a clue & convinced we're governed by those who have yet to admit they dont have a clue either, if i knew i would open my mouth anyway & keep us in this same status quo, the thing is, if we are not doing our best then with what we do & expect should we expect anything other than a good bitch slap, like i said, i dont have a clue, water never depletes, we knew from the 50s how to run engines of hydrogen, cars should be hovering above the ground so we know we need not run vehicles on tyres which are clogging up air filters set up around clued up countries aware to our polluting activities, did 1 ever think where the worn out particles from tyres actually went, its like realising the destruction of our lungs from asbestos which are now removed from brakes, like i said, we're a different animal now, not one governed by destructive fools, but 1 by an emerging force that is beyond the reckoning of my mindset & even then ime no where near the top with those in the the Premier league of awesone minds, i know ime not in the lower divisions of reckless minds which also include those that dont care, thrive of plagerism & cause wars & trouble, maybe thankfully ime 1 of the seeds they tried to bury but just top soil kept germinated enouth to grow new healthy loving souls, & so it begins, life 🌳🌴🫂☯️☮🌎

Yes, we are in the shit,not so much for myself as my time is limited, but for the younger generation it is not looking good, our demand for resources alone cannot be maintained. Could our species have taken a different path, It is debatable. But at this present time, we are still slaughtering our own kind. Surely there must be intelligent life existing within the cosmos that has taken a different pathway. or maybe we are alone.?

Relating to costs of climate change... Problem is no one country is going to solve climate change by itself. The UK's and even Europe's emissions hardly matter for the overall. Investing in costly measures to reduce emissions, will 1) be costly to that countries budget 2) give you no garantee that you will avoid future costs from climate change, and 3) will even put said country at an economical and geo-political disadvantage vis-a-vis countries that do not make these costs. This is a collective action problem/prisoners dillema and should be treated as such, instead of creating moralising narratives of evil rich governements/corporations destroying us all.

This Charlie Gardner thing feels like a major step down. Like come on. I’m done checking in. Roger to Charlie.

I'll tell you when we really need to start worrying..... When the spokespeople for this ideology begin wearing unremarkable clothes and non-attention seeking hairstyles because they've copped on to the fact that it would give them more credibility..... That would be worrisome

If we stop putting particulate matter into the atmosphere the planet will heat up faster because we now need this pollution to reflect sunlight as the global ice sheets and glaciers are disappearing. We have built the perfect box that we will not get ourselves out of. And it breaks my heart.

@glenwarrengeology

19 күн бұрын

It is exciting, isn't it. I can not wait 😅

@kingmantheman

18 күн бұрын

Yeah but those year over year profits 📈 . ... ooooh man

@valoriethechemist

18 күн бұрын

Misinformation. The particles you're talking about are NOT GHGs. Those radiation blocking particles (specifically ones with short durations and relatively innocuous greenhouse effect) we could use to produce such effects are different than what's being emitted. We could curtail pollution to net negative levels while engaging the dispersion of much more appropriate radiation blocking particles. Which would be vastly preferable to what's occurring.

@radscorpion8

12 күн бұрын

​@@valoriethechemist He knows they're not GHGs. He has a PhD you know lol (its in the name). "Those radiation blocking particles are different than what's being emitted" this is wrong, the radiation blocking particles ARE being emitted along with the CO2. Coal, oil and gas plants emit both soot and dirt as well as sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere which reflect sunlight. You even admit that in your own comment when you say "while engaging the dispersion of much more appropriate radiation blocking particles" tacitly admitting this! In other words Russ is right...and he's not the only one to say what he did, but world reknowned climatologist James Hansen as well who led one of the studies that discovered this effect on cargo ships crossing the ocean. So its not "misinformation". We are trapped in a situation where cutting down the use of coal plants will exacerbate warming because of the effect of reduced aerosols and other particulates. Now we COULD counter this with geoengineering, but the problem is many climate scientists are either too scared or too irresponsible and claim that it is too dangerous, in spite of the fact it is literally our only remaining option at this point - we can't reduce CO2 without reducing particulates. We HAVE to engage in geoengineering and geoengineering research. That is our only option. Dim the sun by 1% and you have roughly 1 degree less of warming. It is even better if they do it in space because they don't have to worry about respraying the atmosphere with more aerosols.

@valoriethechemist

12 күн бұрын

@@radscorpion8 My comments were about the claim "we need this pollution." And yes, it is a misinforming claim. The exact particles produced and spread in pollution and are not the only particles capable of causing the effect. We are absolutely caught in a situation where trade offs toward progress cause short term increases in various manners. But we probably want to rip the bandaid off the bullet wound and fix the bullet wound even if we're causing a bit more harm now before we're amputating. An increase at 1.5 is going to be much easier to handle than one at 2.6. And that's the trade off. The problem is really that in terms of total energy added to the system. We're doing nothing toward reducing our impact or the energy rise. Quite the opposite. And while impacts due to scaling down our energy and pollution problems will have a variety of effects. To claim we need pollution is not a claim that, especially in a public forum, would be understood in the manner intended or even what would "need" to occur. There simply isn't extraordinary evidence to suggest we should continue polluting so we don't have to ramp down our emissions and environmental damage purely because it would increase the warming. Quite the contrary in fact. The only issue here is that as we continue to add energy... we do want a mitigating factor... but this mitigating factor isn't "needed" or even the only manner in which we can produce such a mitigating factor. Even if we could or should use some of them.

Ah yes, this is where the hippie doomsters hang out!

There is neither a climate nor ecological crisis.

@thevikingwarrior

19 күн бұрын

You are a crisis made manifest. If the human race goes extinct, I will make an effort to ensure that as people die out due to lack of resources, you will be the first person to go without stuff like food.

@glenwarrengeology

19 күн бұрын

😂😅 oh you poor thing. 😅😮

@jameshayhurst9655

19 күн бұрын

Thanks for that the checks in the post

@Neilhuny

19 күн бұрын

... and bananas are orange coloured With all due respect, you're an idiot