Which empire was the most powerful?

@hyonox

Жыл бұрын

ottoman empire and mongol empire

@acsisters7686

Жыл бұрын

First

@nenenindonu

Жыл бұрын

Mongol empire easily. There was never a case of any other hyperpower being that dominant, it would be followed only by the British and Ottomans

@acsisters7686

Жыл бұрын

North korea

@hyonox

Жыл бұрын

@@acsisters7686 wtf 🤨

The Great Rashidun Caliphate 🇸🇦 , Umayyad Empire, Abbasid Empire, The Great Seljuks, The Great Ottomans 🇹🇷 , Timurid Empire, Mughals 🇮🇳

@kumaraanu

3 ай бұрын

except for mughals,some part of ottomans rest all empires were rulling empty deserts

@user-cq8yo7zb9t

Ай бұрын

Mughals is Uzbek not India

@uyihloughar

Ай бұрын

Not Mughal is Mongol - turk becouse misprouncation count Mongol to mughal​@@user-cq8yo7zb9t

@Aviator727

Ай бұрын

@@user-cq8yo7zb9t we know but they ruled india

@user-cq8yo7zb9t

Ай бұрын

@@Aviator727 if I said Britain 🇮🇳 would it be better than Britain 🇬🇧 then?

There are so many countries missing from this list: - Tang (They literally controlled over half the worlds wealth and you decided to give the dub to a fledgling roman republic...) - Ming (similar reason to tang) - Spanish empire (This one is a bit more debatable as the ottomans were strong, but in the end the Spanish had a better navy and far more influence) - Mauryan empire (during its peak it had the largest military, economy, navy, etc) - Maratha (similar reason to maurya) - France (Napoleon) etc (You filled up a lot of spots with the ottomans and romans. Obviously the ottomans would be worthy of atleast 1 century and the romans of 3 but they weren't always as powerful as they were during their peaks so putting them up there for so long isn't right)

@ComradeHellas

Жыл бұрын

I agree that 18th century should have been France, 17th century Spain and Ming also should have been counted for the 15th century, the Ottomans could stay in their spot for the 16th century. I also agree that Tang could squeeze in during the Roman period. Maurya was also strong enough to make it probably. But the Marathas were never powerful enough, the Mughals and the Qing were powerful Empires but they crumbled in front of the British.

@mng8680

Жыл бұрын

Thats because ancient Chinese dynasties arent well known by the general masses, his list is based on the opinions of random people online and not by historians well versed in world history. Even schools in western countries generally dont teach much about ancient Chinese history so its understandable people dont know them.

@DOLIWAL

Жыл бұрын

Ageee

@ProtectorOfDemocracy1

Жыл бұрын

@@ComradeHellas I agree but ottomans had the most devastating defeats in 16th century.

@bilbobaggins5938

Жыл бұрын

Tang China wasn't existent during the same centuries that the Roman Republic was. The Tang dynasty began ruling China centuries after the Roman Republic had ended.

It's fascinating to see how the balance of power shifts throughout history. Each century brings new challenges and opportunities, leading to different countries rising to the top. It's important to note that military strength is just one aspect of a country's overall power and should be considered within the context of economic, political, and social factors as well.

@chiiesa

Жыл бұрын

Yes exactly so why is britain who was the fastest moving technological power not leading the 18th century ?

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Britain lost against USA in 18th century beside in term of land area and economy Russia seems like bigger than Britain in 18 century

@Deano-Dron81

7 ай бұрын

@@chiiesaaMy question is, why are you still asking?

@circle277

5 ай бұрын

wow!

@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv

3 ай бұрын

​@@widodoakrom3938james Hargreaves, michael faraday, Geoffrey chaucer, henry Bessemer, Edward Jenner, James watt forever

The fact that the Roman Republic and Roman Empire were the strongest for 6 centuries straight is insane to think about

@retrogamermax8287

Жыл бұрын

Rome in it's heyday pretty much owned the known world or at least most of it.

@mayankraj9249

Жыл бұрын

so true

@hakinadedeji

Жыл бұрын

Technology had not advanced... knowledge was primitive, so why won't a nation rule unquestionably for 6 centuries

@alexanderaugustus1650

Жыл бұрын

@@hakinadedeji Yeah facts my fault The Roman Republic and Roman Empire during those 6 centuries were filled with nothing but primitives who knew nothing about how to advance in math, science and architecture. What was I thinking? Silly me

@shaaravguha3760

Жыл бұрын

@@retrogamermax8287 Not really, their stats were pretty close to what the Chinese had going on (their population was smaller though and their economy was also a bit smaller)

What is the source? What was the criteria? There are some picks that are so awful that it’s even hard to think someone acquainted with history developed this video.

@user-iw8ne4pd3h

Жыл бұрын

Source is history books.criteria are territories conquered,army power,economy,time of reign

6 yüzyıl boyunca süper güçmüşüz vay be

@hamid_sahari

Жыл бұрын

🤣 Iran 🇮🇷 is the best

@AltayliKemal

Жыл бұрын

@@hamid_sahari Source:The Rock's Beatiful hair

@Furkan_Pilevne

Жыл бұрын

​@@hamid_sahari 🇮🇷=💩🏳️‍🌈🗑Iran Gay

@buddy7874

Жыл бұрын

3, Seljuks were objectively weaker than Byzantium

@aria-ib9fn

Жыл бұрын

@@hamid_sahari nope

The Achaemenid Empire 🔥

@ArminRadIR

Жыл бұрын

😎🇮🇷

@RamtinHG

Жыл бұрын

Two first centuries 😎🔥

@zambi2

11 ай бұрын

جانم فدتی ایران

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

And the the muslims took over and it all went to shit.

@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv

3 ай бұрын

Beautiful Persian flag in fifth century

Proud to Be Muslim and Ummati of Muhammad SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM (PBUH) 🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦

@njnikusha

Жыл бұрын

🕋☪️🤮🤮💩🤮🤮🕋☪️🤮

@ahmedabdellaoui1628

10 ай бұрын

@@esemre25 what 7 century othman arab timurid ans seljuk

@shaaravguha3760

2 ай бұрын

@@Ecto1777 Tbf it is a bit hard to say that the ottomans were dominant in those years considering they consistently lost to both the spanish and french (they had their share of victories too). It was more a 3 way power struggle where there were 3 equal powers all fighting each other for dominance (the spanish and the french fought each other just as much as they fought the ottomans, in fact that's the reason that the ottomans were able to pick off so many smaller countries. It was because the spanish were distracted with the french.)

It was reinforced later on as the militarily superior Turkic dynasties of the Ghaznavids , the Great Seljuks and their successors came to rule much of the eastern and central Islamic lands . The poetic differentiation of the Turk signifies the extent to which this demographic constituent of the medieval Islamic world retained a distinct identity and image , even as it incorporated itself by degrees into the cultural , social and religious matrices of the Iranian and Arab lands .

@makutas-v261

Жыл бұрын

You are a mountain western chinese savage

@erenjaeger9608

Жыл бұрын

@@makutas-v261 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Turks are less likely to be Chinese than Chinese are to be Turks. polar bear

@Hermes19hnsj

Жыл бұрын

@@makutas-v261 Ok bro. You are %100000000 accurate that's why all Turks admitted this, because they can't deny your massive argument 🤓🤓

@KygoCalvinHarris-xu4kv

3 ай бұрын

​@@makutas-v261Turkish/ greek / thai/ Egyptian cuisine>>>>> Chinese

Achaemenid military had a strong structure of units.

''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''

@Letnistonwandif

Жыл бұрын

Spanish conquest of Oran 1732) (Humilliating defeat for thé ottomans) Spanish conquest of Oran 1509 (Spanish Victory) Battle of Alborán (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Cape Celidonia (extremely humilliating defeat of ottomans) Battle of Cape Corvo (Another humilliating defeat for ottomans) Battle of Girolata( Another victory of spain) Great Siege of Malta( This one was with allies but the ottomans still had more soldiers and they got massacred) Holy League 1535 (Another victory for Spain and his allies still the ottomans had allies too) Capture of Mahdia 1550 (Humilliating defeat for ottomans) Sack of Mahón (Humilliating defeat of barbarrosa by Charles V) Siege of Oran 1556 (Spanish victory) Sieges of Oran and Mers El Kébir (Humilliating ottoman defeat) Ottoman invasion of Otranto (Humilliating defeat for ottomans they surrended even if they were 18 000 compared to 2100 christian forces) Ottoman-Habsburg wars( Spanish hasburg victorie tooking back Hungrary) Siege of the Castle of Saint George (Spanish victory) Conquest of Tunis 1535 (Spanish victory) Siege of Vienna 1529 (One of the most humilliating defeats of ottomans) Siege of Castelnuovo (Even if this was an ottoman victory i wanted to show that even if the Spanish soldiers were outnembered 1 to 6 they still managed to kill more than half of the army this shows that mallority of the battles that ottoman won it was because they had so much more numerical advantage) Conquest of Tunis 1574 (This battle its another example of what i was talking about outnembering and still getting fckd) And battle of lepanto 1571 (another humilliating defeat for the ottomans by the Spaniards) Sitio de Orán y Mazalquivir 1563(Thé most humilliating defeat for thé ottomans 1500 Spaniards vs 100 000 Ottomans and Jannisaries and It ended in an Décisive Spanish Victory. Almost thé entire Ottoman army slaughtered. Toma de Mahdía (1550) Jornada de Túnez

@Letnistonwandif

Жыл бұрын

It seems like you lost a few tho

@pedroguiraosanchez

Жыл бұрын

Spain won ottomans in The battle of lepanto

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@pedroguiraosanchez preveza > lepanto

@pattyguy

Жыл бұрын

@@Letnistonwandif ​ @Letniston wandif it is about 16th century, not 18th century" "ottoman-habsburg wars" not even conclusive, you truly just wanna expand your list, the result was both dynasties getting heavily weakened "Siege of Vienna 1529" you idiot, 1683 is a devastating defeat, 1529 barely affected ottomans, Suleiman just withdrew because bad weather conditions in siege. Siege of Castelnuovo "Muhh, Spanish outnumbered ottomans" 🤓literally no one asked and numbers arent always accurate "Battle of Lepanto 1571" probably the only true thing in your non-sense hot trash "Holy league 1535" ??? "Conquest of Tunis" you lost it back lol "Sack of Mahon" LOL idiot, it is ottoman victory, "sack" "Spanish Conquest of Oran 1509" Ottomans did not even partipicate in that war, it was with Tlemcen (which wasnt connected to ottomans back then) "Battle of Cape Celidonia" The numbers are most likely inaccurate, the possibility of Spanish victory with that amount is pretty low, but yeah it wasnt devastating lol "Battle of Alboran" HUMILIATING DEFEAT? LOL??? THAT BATTLE WAS SO SMALL

Hey, where's part 2? You've only covered a third of world history.

Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.

@shoaibahmed7548

Жыл бұрын

Ofcourse 👍👍

@Kevin-yo8jq

10 ай бұрын

True but the British empire is probably the most influential empire to ever exist.

I miss the Spanish empire and the Chinese dynasties

@nenenindonu

Жыл бұрын

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish, Spain got dominated despite a Holy League alliance losing 2 of the 3 major engagements against Turks (Preveza & Djerba) this while the Spanish were a naval force while Ottomans a land one

@theshadow-

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu this is a lie. Go to study more and say less unsense.

@MarulitoMcarty

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu what about Lepanto?

@kinkel23

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu you lies, but you don´t know it.

@Axel77430

Жыл бұрын

You were in that age?

Proud of being Persian (Achaemenid Empire) Cyrus the great and Dariush the great ❤

The Spanish empire literally connected the whole world, it was the first global power, it brought cocoa, potatoes, corn, pineapple and many other foods to Europe, it made the first circumnavigation of the world, it established trading posts in America, Asia and Europe, it defeated the Ottomans in Lepanto, but it is not here

@simonesantucci4714

Жыл бұрын

We could say the same abot the Dutch empire that in the 17th century had the most powerful and richiest private societies of the whole time and did some of the things you said. Power is also about military, in fact both of them lost against England, if I'm not wrong, but surely in 16th century should have been the Spanish empire there. Anyway in both the centuries they put the Ottoman Empire. Considering also other video we can say that the admin is not objective (Mohammed more influent that Jesus? Are we joking?), his name is Timur so here you have the explanation

@JoseGarcia-qb1qu

Жыл бұрын

The first global empire was Egypt; Ethiopia & others in the midle east then came the europeans ( Spain & others)...when the Europeans went to Americas for the first time they met already some blacks & arab descendents there...

@WalkingSpain

Жыл бұрын

You are absolutely right, in the 16th century the Spanish empire was economically more powerful than the Ottoman empire, militarily it is possible that they were more equal. Although I am Spanish it may seem that what I say is chauvinism but it is a fact.

@atakaninat1811

Жыл бұрын

The span of the Spanish empire is not as effective as the span of the Ottoman empire. One is South America and North America. The other is Asia Europe Africa.

@atakaninat1811

Жыл бұрын

@@WalkingSpain The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.

Iranians proud for Hachaemenid Empire 🇮🇷❤️🤍💚😍

@GyanTvAmit

9 ай бұрын

😂islamic invaders invade your persia but still you people worship their god😂😂lol

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

Well I can tell you Hachaemenid is not proud of today's Iran.

@Elizabeth20-

2 ай бұрын

haha true​@@andreicristian9575

The Ottomans own the most important trade routes. Since the Spanish empire could not reach India, it traveled from the west instead of the east. Ottoman Asia Europe Africa. Spaniards only north and south america.

@sto4552

Жыл бұрын

Spaniards Europe, South America, North America*

@omerfarukozdemir1790

Жыл бұрын

my friend, if the Ottomans had not missed the geographical discoveries and the industrial revolution, they would have remained the greatest power until the 20th century.

@cesgeminis7135

Жыл бұрын

You have no idea about the story. Spain controlled almost all of continental Europe, the Philippines, and many more parts of Asia. The Spanish faced the Japanese, with a great disadvantage, and won. They had much more influence than the Ottoman Empire, the best military tactics among other things. They created new routes, with much more importance for Europe than those controlled by the Ottoman Empire. If the Spanish empire had been weaker than the Ottoman empire, today Europe would be Muslim.

@kasadam85

Жыл бұрын

@@cesgeminis7135 Naval defeats didn't bring the collapse of the Empire, losing land battles did. If Spanish was as powerful as you're saying, they'd not fear facing the Ottomans on land and pass through Egypt by force rather than stretching trade network incredibly long.

@allahisthe_devil

Жыл бұрын

They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂

Macedonian flag is wrong. Ancient Macedonia and Alexander the Great haven't any relation with the county North Macedonia. People from there are Slavs. Ancient Macedonians were Greeks. There is a region in northern Greece that is called Macedonia and is the descendant of Ancient Macedonia.

@sagamaster124

Жыл бұрын

no existe descendencia, todos ellos son turcos xd

@nikolaigrudev6126

Жыл бұрын

Съвремените Гърци нямат нищо общо със Елада и древните Гърци! Съвремените Гърци са пришълци от Северна Африка и Анадолска Азия. Съвремените Гърци са дошли заедно със Османците на Балканският полуостров през 14 век и Англия я създава като държава през 1830 година след войните със Османската империя. За да създаде имидж съвременните Гърци крадат Античната История на Елините,като дават пример и на други измислени Нации да го правят за бъдещето като Македония,Украйна,Италия ( която няма нищо общо със Римската империя),Румъния,Египет...

This list is highly debatable

@alparslan698

Жыл бұрын

It's fairly accurate but it's debatable

@DevRaj-ry2th

Ай бұрын

​@@alparslan698actually it's not. I'll give an example if you want. The user name you have "alp arslan" Wasn't the most powerful man in 11th century. There were others. For example Rajendra chola. The great king if tamils who decimated 2 great empires and several kingdoms. A pioneer in advanced naval combat who's ships ruled the global sea trade. He conquered the lands between Arabian sea and phillipines. Maintained an army of 1,500,000 infantry, 125,000 cavalry, 12 thousand elephants. All spread across his massive empire. And you think alp arslan, a seljuk who couldn't even raise an army of 100,000 was more powerful than rajendra? If you think I am exaggerating the numbers, these numbers weren't given by indian historians. They were written down by a Chinese general. That is the problem with you people. You only know your history.

And the Spanish Empire?

@nenenindonu

Жыл бұрын

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

@shaaravguha3760

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu That's an incredibly narrow minded thing to say. You're telling me an empire (the ottomans) famed for its land armies is stronger than a navally focused empire (the spanish) just because they beat them in some land wars?

@lafidemoda

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu Lepanto war, nothing else to say...

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''

@isgodtnt7292

Жыл бұрын

2rd strongest in (15~17)c

Unpopular opinion: the chinese dybasties should have appeared for many centuries but we akwaus neglect it because it’s history was almost separate and unaffected by the history of Europe and the middle east, plus maybe the civilization of the native Americans could have made it to the list also

@Deepak_Dhakad

Жыл бұрын

And no one gave fuck about india which had 1/3rd of earth population bruh. Maurya empire , Gupta empire , Delhi sultanate , and Mughal empire.

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Sorry for native America but they didn't deserve on this list

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

Chinese will make the list in a few decades, after the fall of USA.

@PortugalZeroworldcup

5 ай бұрын

Mayans were doing well before Christ till they had to give up human sacrifices

@luv_sic

4 ай бұрын

Who? Zhou, Tang? West always was stronger...

Hello, I'm Korean. Isn't this too European standard? When studying Korean history, we teach that when China invaded Goguryeo in Korea in 612, they attacked Hangul with an army of 1.13 million troops. There was never a time in the history of the Islamic Empire when an army of 1 million troops was mobilized, but isn't this too fabricated?

The great historian Ibn Khaldun also argues in his “Introduction to History” (or The Muqaddimah) that nomadic peoples, the Turks foremost among them, were the most energetic and martial of peoples and that imperial dynasties and regimes emerged from such groups until they became corrupted and softened by civilization and luxury, which resulted in a loss of martial energy and group solidarity. This analysis is very true because as the Abbasid caliphate started to lose its power and influence in the mid-ninth century most of the dynasties that emerged to control the various regions of the Muslim world were founded by Turks, either tribal nomads or former slave soldiers. Ibn Khaldun even attributes the victory of the Muslims over the Mongols to the martial power and energy of the Turks, who formed the elite ranks of the Mamluk armies that defeated the Mongols on several occasions as they attempted to advance into Syria and Egypt between 1260 and 1323.

@REALALIENDUDE

Жыл бұрын

😀

@timkaz8793

Жыл бұрын

So called Mongol Army were mostly consisted of Eastern turks, who were not yet Muslims by the time. Among them there were some ancient Mongol tribes too, but not the majority

@Nomadicenjoyer31

Жыл бұрын

@@timkaz8793 yeah

@makutas-v261

Жыл бұрын

"history enjoyer" yeah, ERDOGAN'S history I bet

@makutas-v261

Жыл бұрын

Your so called turkic ethnicity are just the mountain barbarians of the chinese west 🤠

Buyuk Amir Temur 🇺🇿👑

@user-cg2tw8pw7j

Жыл бұрын

Uzbeks want to talk to you

@ASWAR9622

Жыл бұрын

You can't call anyone "great"

@josephstalin8543

Жыл бұрын

@@ASWAR9622 he's great according to that time's standards

@ASWAR9622

Жыл бұрын

@@josephstalin8543 Read about Cyrus the great, then you will understand what great means

During the 16th century, the Spanish empire was the most powerful As for the 20th century, it was a bit contested between the Americans, the British and the Germans in the two first decades and later the Soviets would enter the game. But generally speaking the USA were clearly the hegemonic superpower of the 20th century.

@Gatao_2020

Жыл бұрын

Hegemonic only became after the collapse in 1991. I would say that the Soviets and the Americans should be on the list of the 20th century, both were extremely powerful

@raphael3620

Жыл бұрын

America became strong on 21st century after collapse of Soviet union

@Gatao_2020

Жыл бұрын

@@raphael3620 I agree

@abert1313

Жыл бұрын

Насчёт Испании в 16 веке - справедливо. Империя, над которой никогда не заходит солнце". Открытие и захват Америки, Филиппин, Южной Европы, Нидерландов, контроль над Францией.

@Gatao_2020

Жыл бұрын

@@abert1313 Bro, I'm Latin em I also speak english. But Russian? God, bro. That's enough

While Rome's hostility to Turks dated back to late antiquity particularly against Tengrist Oghuric entities like the Bulgars, Avars, Huns, the arrival of Seljuks marked the begin of a new front against a distinct Muslim powerhouse conquering their way into Anatolia

10-7 centuries BC = Neo Assyrian Empire 6. century AD = Turkic Khaganate 7-9 centuries AD = Tang China 12. century AD = Khwarezmian empire

@MetaJuggernaut

Жыл бұрын

tang dynasty is bs. China never ever be the strongest country

@sidequestenjoyer7037

Жыл бұрын

The strongest country in the 6th century was China

@1sultan189

Жыл бұрын

7,8,9 were the caliphates as they were bigger, had the best economy, center of the world in knowledge, strongest military, strongest currency, strongest legacy.

@sarveshkumarsinha9628

Жыл бұрын

@@1sultan189 lol, only area ,economy is nope

@shaaravguha3760

Жыл бұрын

@@1sultan189 You must be on something. The tangs economy is uncertain but the lowest estimates anyone has ever thrown out was 40% of the world GDP with the highest being around 80%... The entire middle east at the time only accounted for around 7% while India was a bit higher at around 10-15%

So..the spanish empire where do you left it?Lepanto's Battle, Cartagena, San Quintín?..

2:49 Makedonia is greece and the vergina flag is blue not red

I'm not following how the USSR was stronger than the USA in the 20th century if the USSR collapsed lol

@WeoXCY

Ай бұрын

You're probably uneducated

Maurya dynasty from India 🇮🇳 was also one of the strongest

@osmanbey286

Жыл бұрын

Never exist 😂🤣😂🤣

@fatih.1453

Жыл бұрын

😁

@soshankodasbappi7920

Жыл бұрын

@@osmanbey286 search and find you slumdog......2300bc most powerful empire......2001 crist. Chola empire who won Indonesia Malaysia Maldives srilanka south India.......720 christ Bhoj dynisty defeat Arab for 20 times go and search

@Guarbanglamaharajishaannandi

Жыл бұрын

@@osmanbey286 maga turu la said you it never existed lol then how does the buddhism religion came lol???? From space???

@IceBear09

Жыл бұрын

I think the same but maurya dynasty does not have that much high Gdp and growth like mughal empire at Aurangzeb time......

What is name of music, please.

What is name of music?

The Spanish empire and the Han and Tang Dynasties were all really powerful and deserved to be on here

@nenenindonu

Жыл бұрын

Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

@rarescevei8268

Жыл бұрын

@@SRcontinentesoficial the spanish were better in terms of navy and influence, the ottoman land army was superior

@shaaravguha3760

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu If we're putting the Brits above the French then we're putting the spanish above the ottomans. The ottomans had a better land army while the spanish had more influence and a better navy...

@ComradeHellas

Жыл бұрын

agreed

@FBI.capturo.gente.rara.

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu Who had more territory?

Shouldn't the Spanish Empire been the strongest power in the 16th Century on this list?

@nenenindonu

Жыл бұрын

Nope Ottomans were always stronger than the Spanish Empire, Ottomans defeated them despite a Holy League alliance winning 2 of the 3 major engagements against Spain (Preveza & Djerba)

@buddy7874

Жыл бұрын

@@nenenindonu only here you deny the fact that Spain was at war with the whole of Europe. in that chtsl and Ottomans, and won.

@eduardovieirinha9697

Жыл бұрын

People always value Spain and forget Portugal. Both Portugal and Spain were the most powerful and with most territories in the 16th century. Especially when they formed the Iberian Union

@Emmi5542.

Жыл бұрын

Ottoman, Timurid and Seljuk are Turk, and also Huns

@pelao1558

Жыл бұрын

@@buddy7874 Spain still had more allies than the Ottomans

Why you do stop at the 5th Century BCE?

This may have been so when the slaves were originally trained and appointed. But the effect in the long term was to create communities of Turks at a high level who, enjoying the borrowed authority of the sovereign, could usurp power for themselves. This was the origin of the group known as the Ghaznavids (after Ghazni, the city in Afghanistan, which, after the Samanids had seized it for themselves, was assigned as the center of their province). In the early centuries of the second millennium, these various Turkic groups, whether slave or free, usurped control of various parts of Iranian territory, sometimes passing through it to establish dominions even beyond the sphere of the Caliphate. So in 999 the Qarakhanids took control of Transoxiana from the Samanids, which they then held for two centuries. This brought the region firmly within the domain of Turkic mother tongue, as it has been ever since, and by the same token gave Persian the status of lingua-franca At the same time as this Qarakhanid action, the Ghaznavids took over the center and south of the Samanids' territory. A little later, the Oghuz (also known as Turcomans), and above all a leading group of them called the Seljuqs, hitherto widely used as mercenaries by the Samanids and the Ghaznavids, infiltrated northern Khorasan. At Dandanagan in 1040, they definitively defeated the Ghaznavids. Khorasan became theirs alone, and the Ghaznavids were compelled henceforth to look south, for new conquests in India. The Seljuqs went on to destroy Buyid control of the east of the Caliphate, taking Baghdad in 1055 (and receiving the caliph's blessing as his liberators), and in 1071, for good measure, defeating the Byzantine Empire at Manzikert, so opening up Anatolia to Turkic colonization over the next few centuries. In 1089, they defeated the Qarakhanids too, but did not dispossess them, holding them rather as their vassals (muqta') for the next fifty years. It might have been expected that these different ruling dynasties, Ghaznavid, Qarakhanid, and Seljuq, would have brought a new lingua-franca to the Middle East in the eleventh century. They did, after all, speak mutually intelligible forms of Turkic; and this was the beginning of what would turn into almost a millennium of Turkish rule, as witness the Arabic proverb cited by the North African analytic historian Ibn Khaldun of the fourteenth century: dawlah 'ind al-turk, din 'ind al-'arab wa adab 'ind al-furs Power (rests) with the Turk, religion with the Arab, and culture with the Persian.

Please correct the spelling of "Century" in every slide..

The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. The Turks too , the great warriors of the steppes , were almost haughty in the assumption that they inherited the jihad fighting spirit of the tradition and carried it half - way into Europe . Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective p.94 The Seljukian Turks had had some great warriors ; the period of their power was during the eleventh and twelfth centuries ; they had taken the place of the Arabs as the great Moslem power of the east , though an Arab caliph still nominally reigned at Baghdad . The Divine Aspect of History Volume 2 p.324

@borhanuddin8447

Жыл бұрын

The turk suddenly become strongest after they accepted Islam. Same thing happened with Arabs. After accepting Islam super power of the world. Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now.

@pattyguy

Жыл бұрын

@@borhanuddin8447 "Too bad now, they are not following proper islam now. That's why not Super power now." uh not really buddy

@wankawanka3053

Жыл бұрын

Mongols and russians laughing in the corner

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@wankawanka3053 Most Mongol army was made up from Turkic peoples and 1/4 of Mongols are from Turkic tribes kiddo🤣 even today LOL The name Mongol appeared first in the eighth-century Chinese records of the Tang dynasty, but only resurfaced in the eleventh century during the rule of the Khitan. At first, it was applied to some small and insignificant nomadic tribes in the area of the Onon River. In the thirteenth century, however, the name Mongol grew into an umbrella term for a large group of Mongolic and Turkic tribes united under the rule of Genghis Khan. It is not clear what the Mongols called themselves in their own languages. In fact, the specific origin of the Mongolic languages is unclear. Some linguists have proposed a link to languages like Tungusic and Turkic, which are often included alongside Mongolic in a hypothetical language group called “Altaic languages”, but the evidence for this is rather weak.

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@wankawanka3053 Slavic history is better than Hellenic but Turkic is better than both combined LOL

Y el Imperio Español? El imperio donde no se ponia el sol.

@roadbone1941

Ай бұрын

El vídeo es una estupidez, España era obviamente una superpotencia y más poderosa que los otomanos. Los españoles literalmente tenían un imperio global, mientras que los otomanos no. De hecho, donde vivo (estado de Washington) solía ser parte del Imperio español.

@alesanteorias464

Ай бұрын

@@roadbone1941 Aca Texas también.

19th century - Napoleon Empire.

@gurnish9741

Жыл бұрын

@adolfmeyer1103 but the century bears the name of napoleon

@kerimahmedli4637

Жыл бұрын

​@Adolf Meyer Why then America showed?

@TheVampirbat

Жыл бұрын

​@@gurnish9741 но Наполеон проиграл России)

@gurnish9741

Жыл бұрын

@@TheVampirbat yes but easy when you just run away

@kumaraanu

3 ай бұрын

Napolean bare ruled for 10-20 years , it cant be counted for global power for a century

Eskiden super gucmusuz simdi kimseye sonumuz bile gecmiyor nereden nereye

@ramazanabay2163

Жыл бұрын

He lan 400 yıl süper güçmüşüz amk

@erenjaeger9608

Жыл бұрын

Değişmeyen tek şey değişimin kendisidir

Very nice video, but in the 2nd century BC to the 7th century AD, the Parthian and Sassanid empires were as powerful as the Roman empire, and throughout history, both fought many wars with each other and were roughly equal. Rome won some wars against Iran, but Iran also won equally against Rome Too; It cannot be said that Rome was an absolute power.

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

7th century belongs to Arab caliphate or tang dynasty

@OmiDJamshidzad

Жыл бұрын

@@widodoakrom3938 yes but after persian empires and roman empires

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

@@OmiDJamshidzad in term economy tang dynasty is the richest empire at 7th century

@OmiDJamshidzad

Жыл бұрын

@@widodoakrom3938 i don't know about richest empire or dynasty at that era but about power and civilization it is clear, 2nd persian empire was the best

@user-zh4yf5lj6s

11 ай бұрын

@@widodoakrom3938 الخلافة العباسية انتصرت على سلاله تانغ في معركة تالاس

22nd century Slovakia 🙂 🇸🇰 ♾

@ComradeHellas

Жыл бұрын

hahahahahahha

@milanchovanec5551

Жыл бұрын

@@ComradeHellasjust laugh, you communist 💀 ⚔ 💣

@DOLIWAL

Жыл бұрын

🤣

@max-greg

Жыл бұрын

What is that?

@milanchovanec5551

Жыл бұрын

@@max-gregfiction ☯️

Y en el 17 podria serlo pefectamente

Every 100 years there is new Strong Power Roman with Ottaman Empire: hehe

Does anybody notice that century is spelled centrury? (Which is wrong)

@pipebombinyourmailbox8226

Жыл бұрын

Cenrtury is wrong

The fact that Roman Empire eventually fell simply proves that even the biggest and most dominant powers atm will inevitably fall after a point

how to make videos like this

it must be spanish empire instead rus empire. Also, 6 Turkic empire in 20 centuries is amazing.

For instance , the Turks are frequently referred to as a " warrior race .

@wankawanka3053

Жыл бұрын

Mire like "the uninvited guest" -russians

@kaldirdimgobegi

8 ай бұрын

@@wankawanka3053 ?

Rome and Ottoman Empire:💪

Proud of Carthage

@jobniak

Жыл бұрын

You don't have any relationship to Carthage. You are Arab, but Carthaginians were Phoenicians.

@younas258

Жыл бұрын

@@jobniak First, in terms of ethnicity, we are Amazigh and not Arabs with some additions from Western Asia and South Europe. Second, you can look for a study of the United States Stanford University on several Carthaginian mummies that show that they do not carry any Phoenician genes.The reason for this is that when the Phoenicians came their number was few and mixed with an indigenous population

@ahmedabdellaoui1628

10 ай бұрын

@@younas258 no north africa today are mostly arabs an cartage was Phoenicians and stop talking bulshit about us study cartage was destroyed and her people killed and slaved and you bebers not amazigh was traitors who helped the romans go to see other history to steal it because u dont have any history berber just other nations colonise you land

@Mariyanthi

9 ай бұрын

​@@jobniakBoth Phoenicians and Arabs are Semitic ya know.. All those ancient cultures of MENA were cousins with each other and their languages were similar !

And as far as I know, when Columbus discovered the American continent in 1492, I learned in history class that the Ming Dynasty of China's Tanou ship was 20 times the size of Columbus' ship 100 years before that, and it is true that the Ottomans were powerful, but I don't think they were more powerful than the Qing Dynasty at the time. And I know that the Holy Roman Empire had a weaker military power than Korea's Goryeo. 30,000 troops are also a lot, but Goryeo is a country that mobilized 300,000 troops. Please don't manipulate it.

@July977

Ай бұрын

Historical nihilism has always existed in the West. For East Asia, wars between ancient European countries were equivalent to petty quarrels between a few villages. At that time, Europe had a small population, a lack of historical documents, and not many unearthed cultural relics. A war involving tens of thousands of people in the Roman Empire is enough to be called a large-scale war, and its scale can only be compared with the Zhou Dynasty and Shang Dynasty in China. Before Qin Shihuang unified China, any vassal state could quickly mobilize more than 300,000 troops to participate in the war. Even the remaining Xiongnu forces that were defeated by the Han Dynasty and annexed half of them easily defeated European countries. Of course, the Goryeo Dynasty, which was in a very dangerous situation in East Asia, could definitely be called a powerful empire if it were located in ancient Europe. Competition in ancient East Asia was very cruel, and many ethnic groups had been exterminated in the war. Now Western pseudo-historical theories The logic is that the Roman Empire won the most. They are fighting in Europe, so they are very strong, but they have never thought about the level of the opponents they defeated...

@July977

Ай бұрын

The Ottoman Empire was not necessarily more powerful than the Goryeo Dynasty at the same time. However, there was little competition pressure in the region where the Ottoman Empire was located, and its strength could not be compared with that of the Qing Dynasty at the same time. Only the Chinese and the countries invaded by the Qing Dynasty are qualified to criticize the Qing Dynasty. At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, it defeated the Ming Dynasty, and later defeated Tsarist Russia, annexed the Junggar Khanate, expedition to Gorkha, eliminated many small countries, and had 23 vassal states. The scope, scale and results of the operation were unmatched by any country at the time. It's just that in comparison, China prefers to widely publicize the decline and humiliation of the late Qing Dynasty.

@user-vj7fr7cp3k

Ай бұрын

@@July977 Personally, I hate China very much, but I think we have to admit it. At the time, the Qing Dynasty had the largest population in the world, accounting for 30% of the world's GDP, and its army was capable of mobilizing 1 million troops for expeditions, but the largest expeditionary force of the Ottoman Empire was. 200,000 people. This is considerably smaller than the war between Goguryeo and Sui Dynasty, which was one of the wars between ancient Korea and China.

@user-vj7fr7cp3k

Ай бұрын

@@July977 There is a record that the Sui Dynasty mobilized an army of 1.13 million troops and attacked Goguryeo in 612, but lost. However, there was no record of a war on such a large scale in Europe until World War I.

Awesome my friend, have a great week🙂👍

bro really gifed 20th century to Ussr, which lost Cold War

Golden Point - Corporate Being Boss of Everything is Proof that Only Work Makes Money

turkhis empire 🤙

Y el imperio español? JAJAJAJAJA eres un meme

@sagamaster124

Жыл бұрын

meme es usted, el imperio otomano lo supera y le gano´varias veces. el imperio de las austrias español estaba en decadencia desde la batalla de las comunas

@gabelli1998

Жыл бұрын

@@sagamaster124 ya... Claro, casi toda América, filipinas, las demás indias orientales... Seguro que sí.

@pedroguiraosanchez

Жыл бұрын

@@sagamaster124 españa derrotó a los otomanos en la batalla de lepanto …… poseía media europa y casi toda america

@sagamaster124

Жыл бұрын

@@pedroguiraosanchez España no existía, era una confederación en la península.

@sagamaster124

Жыл бұрын

@@gabelli1998 Rusia es más grande que EEUU, decime quien es superior. El mayor Territorio de la monarquía hispanica estaba casi despoblada.

What do you mean by “cenrtury”?

There are still missing Ming Dynasty and Mughal Empire

From Russia with love

@bananus2255

Жыл бұрын

how sweet

@sagamaster124

Жыл бұрын

mi amor

Roman and Roman Republic super power for like 6 centuries. And Muslim empire was super power of WORLD for like 7 centuries. Arab caliphate (2), Seljuk(1), Timurid(1), Ottoman (3)

@caso5685

Жыл бұрын

Timurid wasnt islamic lol, Timur massacred Muslims

@TheVampirbat

Жыл бұрын

Давай христиан посчитаем, клоун?

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Han/Qin, Mauryan empire, sasanid empire be like: are we a joke to u?

@rome316ae3

Жыл бұрын

This list is inaccurate

The Song, Tang and the Han dynasties are missing

The resulting Peace of Passarowitz witnessed the advent of ' the period when Europeans became militarily superior to peoples who in the past had been their equals or superiors , most notably the Turks ' ( Black , 1994 , p . 14 ) .

XULO TAS SALTAO EL PRIMER IMPERIO GLOBAL DE LA HISTORIA, EL IMPERIO ESPAÑOL, CUALQUIER IDEA QUE NO SEA QUE DEBE DE ESTAR ME SOBRA

@gonzalosujarguillen8638

Жыл бұрын

siglos 16 17

@gonzalosujarguillen8638

Жыл бұрын

en primera mitad del s 17 España y Portugal estaban unidas en la Unión Ibérica, sus imperios estaban unidos, casi na

@gonzalosujarguillen8638

Жыл бұрын

@MUHAMMAD SAIF aro o el macedonio por la fruta

@AW-zk5qb

Жыл бұрын

Lmao this list is insane. The US was clearly the most powerful country in the 20th century. The Soviet Union was never even an equal of the US during the Cold War much less stronger, and the US ended the 20th century as the sole superpower and was clearly the most powerful nation (when taking everything, from military to economy to cultural influence, into account) since 1945. Also, The France was the most powerful nation in the 18th century with Britain and France battling over the 17th and 18th centuries for dominance and Spain was the most powerful nation in the world in the 16th century. I know there has been a push to try to pretend that Europe wasn't dominant from 1500-1900s before the US took over, but it's just a fact that they were

@srmagicpanda9606

Жыл бұрын

@@AW-zk5qb Yep

What about the Portuguese and Spanish Empire? This two should be also in...

Cyrus great❤

Antiquity was the era of the two great powers, the Han Dynasty and Rome.

@Nomadicenjoyer31

Жыл бұрын

And many nomadic Germanic/Turkic empires :)

@kaw4182

Жыл бұрын

@@Nomadicenjoyer31 Definitely it is true. We can say that The Xiongnu made The Han build the Great Wall. And then Germanic people made The Roman army stronger.

@rome316ae3

Жыл бұрын

Also Mauryan Empire

whats more satisfying than seeing rome/byzantium dominating everything.

Pov your in the comments backing up your counties power

Ottoman empire and Timurid empire are Turkish states. 🇹🇷❤️

@Enes-qv1tf

Жыл бұрын

Huns are also Turks.

@temirbug_han

Жыл бұрын

Huns & Selçuk & Mongol

@Enes-qv1tf

11 ай бұрын

@Cobra-67 Huns are Turks.

Of course, the Ottoman Empire

@allahisthe_devil

Жыл бұрын

They lost British empire. And now gonna die by earthquake 😂

@njnbrlre2679

Жыл бұрын

They were meme material

timurid and seljuk underrated empires

15th century should be spain i think

Seeing this indian empires left the chart by by by byyyyyyyy

@sarveshkumarsinha9628

Жыл бұрын

I think the list is for nomadic and empires of mainly middle east and europe

@Its-darkdead6

Жыл бұрын

@@sarveshkumarsinha9628 You think Indian empire was powerful Only Muarya was powerful but also in rank 2 in 2nd century bc

@sarveshkumarsinha9628

Жыл бұрын

@@Its-darkdead6 it was powerful from the beginning u should study history instead of biased media

España fue un imperio y no aparece

The Roman Empire reached its zenith from around 31 BC, when Octavian wrested control of Egypt from the Ptolemies and his rival Marc Antony, to around 226 AD under Severus Alexander, when the Persians succeeded the Parthians and posed a serious threat to Rome's eastern provinces. Rome held the line there, more or less, until around 614 AD, but in the meantime it lost much of the north and west to the Germanic invaders. The US became the main global power in the aftermath of WWII and reached its zenith in the 1990s when it eclipsed the broken Soviet Union. As for the 21st Century, we are still in very early days and it's a long way even to 2050; so far the US' military adventurism in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and who knows where else next could consolidate its hegemony or be a pitfall to a serious setback. We just don't know right now. Good Luck!

@nocturnalrecluse1216

Жыл бұрын

The American hegemony ain't going anywhere.

I just can't believe the roman ruled for 6 century stright and destroyed to pulp by germanic tribe .

Moim zdaniem Stany Zjednoczone dominowały nad związkiem radzieckim przez cały XX

@abert1313

Жыл бұрын

США даже над Северным Вьетнамом не сумели доминировать. Несмотря на помощь союзников и Южного Вьетнама.

@konrad5528

Жыл бұрын

@@abert1313 może i nieudało im się zdominować Wietnamu Ale mieli szereg różnorodnych innych osiągnięć na kącie 1 Pierwsi wylądowali na księżycu 2 Jako pierwsi weszli w posiadanie broni jądrowej 3Zbudowali największą gospodarkę na świecie 4 Uzyskali dominację na całej zachodniej części globu a i na wschodniej ich zdanie nie było bez znaczenia 5 przesądziły o losach 2 wojen światowych 6 wygrały zimną wojne 7 wynaleźli internet 8 zbudowali największą armię świata 9 przetrwały A związek radziecki co 1wyslał pierwszego psa i póziniej człowieka w kosmos A dalej co 2 bez pomocy amerykanów przegrał by 2 wojnę światową 3 zbudował największy zaraz obok nazizmu system totalitarny 4 doprowadził do wielkiego głodu na terenach dzisiejszej Ukrainy 5 wysuszył 4 największe jezioro świata 6 w skutek wielu niedopatrzeni doprowadził do wybuchu reaktora jądrowego w Czarnobylu 7 miał chyba najgorszą gospodarkę w śród państw o statuśe światowego mocarstwa 8 całkowiće odcioł obywateli i to nie tylko swoich od jakich kolejek informacji sprzecznych z narracją rządu 9 upadł

@abert1313

Жыл бұрын

@@konrad5528 СССР как таковой выжил а войне на уничтожение против всей объединенной Европы, спас от геноцида славянские народы, в том числе и чехов с поляками. Помощь США СССР в 3 раза меньше, чем Британии во 2мировой и ничтожна. К тому же именно олигархия США финансировала Гитлера и создала германскую военную промышленность, то есть СССР победил и США. Потеряв 1.6 трлн долларов 45 года и 42 млн. человек - треть имущества и четверть населения СССР возродился за пять лет, одновременно кормил Восточную Европу и Китай, создал атомное оружие и ракеты. Тем самым СПАС МИР ОТ ЯДЕРНОЙ ВОЙНЫ! А это никто никогда не сможет повторить. США по сути - вообще не империя - это антиимперия - паразит. Аварии с АЭС были и в США - посмотри Вики - опасней чем Чернобыль. Одновременно с голодом в СССР была великая депрессия и в США - посмотри динамику населения США за 30-е годы - там умерло от голода фермеров не меньше чем в СССР крестьян. В остальном - наука СССР не уступала Западу по числу открытий в том числе в космосе - первый спутник, человек в космосе - выход, Венера, посадка на Луну, исследования Марса и пр. Был создан и аналог интернета ещё в 70 -х, использовался Госпланом и в управлении страной. Крупнейшие вооруженные силы были именно у СССР - по всем показателям, даже по водоизмещению боевых кораблей. СССР распался не из за слабости - произошла трансформация государственного устройства. Сейчас Россия воссоединится на новых принципах и 21 век станет веком России.

@konrad5528

Жыл бұрын

@@abert1313 Zsrs nie przetrwał zimnej wojny wcale nie uratował ludności słowiańskie od ludobójstwa czasem wręcz sam na nim je przeprowadzał np katyń w 1940 na ludności Polskiej lub brutalne stłumienie powstania na węgrzech w 1956 albo gdy w czasie powstania Warszawskiego mimo że stacjonowali po drugiej stronie wisły niezdecydowani się pomóc powstańcom i nie pozwolili brytyjskim pilotom którzy pomagali powstańcom w walce przeciw niemcom lądować po swojej stronie wisły (mimo że uk było wtedy ich sojusznikiem więc nie było żadnych przeciwskazania) doprowadzając do upadku powstania A po 1945 mimo iż ogłosili amnestię to i tak prześladowali (zależny od nich marionetkowy rząd polski) żołnierzy AK i tak samo w 1981 A odnosinie finansowania Hitlera to zsrs do 1941 było sojusznikiem Niemiec i też nawet bardziej od USA sfinasowały rzeszę to USA pokonało Hitlera Zsrs nie karmił wcale Europy okradał zależne od siebie państwa z wypracowanych przez je zasobów nieuratował też wcale świata od wojny Gdyby nie USA zsrs sam by wywołał wojnę W USA też zadżaly się poważne wypadki spowodowane niedopatżeniem człowieka ale po pierwsze w zsrs było ich znacznie więcej po drugie były one znacznie poważniejsze a po trzecie tych które zdarzyły się w zwiąsku radzieckim łatwiej było by uniknąci I ogólnie były takie bardziej absurdalne Na zachodzie obywatele mieli wpływ na życie publiczne i politykę państwa w którym żyją w zsrs i państwach zależnych niebyło tego Ogólnie w stanach żyło się lepiej słyszałem mnóstwo historii o tym jak ktoś uciekał z zsrs i państw zależnych na zachód i naprawdę niewiele o odwrotnym stanie rzeczy Sam gdybym żył w tamtych czasach wolał bym mieszkać w USA

@abert1313

Жыл бұрын

@@konrad5528 ты бредишь. Что такое Катынь, и прочие мелочи на весах истории? Где бы ты был без жертв советского народа, спасшего твоих предков от истребления? СССР не был идеальным государством, поэтому переформатировался, но по сравнению с "цивилизованным" Западом он как скала по сравнению с кучей навоза. В остальном, очень скоро все решится.

Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."

@user-dj7vx4em3z

Жыл бұрын

Egyptian Empire🇪🇬🇪🇬🇪🇬 The 18th and 19th dynasties, the Skinnen Ra dynasty and the Ramesside dynasty Fatimid caliphate Ayyubid Caliphate Mamluk Caliphate.

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

@@user-dj7vx4em3z Fatimids, Ayyubids and Mamluks were not Copts

@Emmi5542.

Жыл бұрын

Merhaba kardeşim tamamen haklısın bu yorumu ingilizce yazacak kadar İngilizcem var fakat bunu biraz erindim evet o zamanlar Türkler dünyayı yönetse de burda medya çok önemli şuan medya süpergüç America ve İngiltere'nin altında bu yüzden biizm tarihimizi bertaraf etmeye çalışıyorlar ama o yıllarda böyle dünyanın her tarafından insanların yazışıp görülebileceği şeyler olsaydı her yerde Türkler övülecekti yani.

@Emmi5542.

Жыл бұрын

Medyanın bu dönemki devletlerin kontrol altında olması çok kötü

@wankawanka3053

Жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

In which language is century spelt cenrtury?

No any East Asian empires? This is really unreasonable.

For the eastern provinces of Byzantium the Persian invasions marked the final break with the secure world of classical antiquity. In the Balkan provinces the break had already taken place. Even during the reign of Justinian the Balkans had been threatened by various Turkic peoples, nomadic Bulgars from the steppes, and much of Justinian's defensive building programme had been directed against their raids. In the second half of the sixth century a new danger arose, that of an alliance between nomadic and more settled peoples. The more settled people were the Slavs, historically well attested but archaeologically difficult to identify, who seem to have moved south in large numbers from the river valleys of central and northern Europe. In south Russia they can perhaps be identified with the culture group who owned the Martynovka Hoard, a collection of silver jewellery whose decoration bears out the agricultural interests of this essentially pastoral people. The nomadic group under whose influence the Slavs fell were the Avars, one of the fiercest of the Turkic peoples to emerge from the Asian steppes, who had left a trail of destruction from as far afield as China. Their horse burials and characteristic jewellery make them easily identifiable, and though relatively few in number, they seem to have exerted a military hegemony over the more numerous Slavs. The two groups crossed the Danube in the 580s and seized a succession of Balkan towns and cities, reaching far south into the Peloponnese, until only a few coastal territories were left in Byzantine hands. There was considerable resistance at first, espe cially under the emperor Maurice in the 590s, but when Phocas seized power in 602 he no longer attempted to hold the Danube frontier, and the pace and density of Avar-Slav settlement greatly increased.

I think it would be much better to make 2 or even three countries per century where necessary (for example I'd put USSR and USA for the 20th century). Because, apart from the Roman empire, you probably can't name a Country that dominated throughout an entire century. Most of the countries in the list weren't undisputed leaders. So yes, 2 or even three. Another reason why to do so would be to show and see the historical rivalries. In any case thx for the video. I did enjoy it.

@nocturnalrecluse1216

Жыл бұрын

It wasn't the first American century for nothing.

@PortugalZeroworldcup

5 ай бұрын

Austro Hungarian empire also there

@S.P.Q.Rrespublicas

4 ай бұрын

The 6th Century would definitley then be Rome and the Sassanids, and the 3rd Century BC, Rome, Carthage, and Maurya instead of just Carthage.

13th wasnt mongol empire, it was czech kingdom

The Arabs themselves, divided and fragmented, were being increasingly challenged by Turkic steppe warriors who were militarily superior to the commercially minded urban populations of the region. The Arab-Muslim expansionary movement that had begun with Muhammad's first conquests in the early part of the seventh century, had proceeded with fits and starts before it came under pressure from external menaces and had started to wane by the tenth century. But, if conquest had all but ceased, Arabic culture and language was continuing to expand both east and south into sub-Saharan Africa. At the same time, Persian culture was making a comeback of sorts, while the Turks were rapidly gaining a steady foothold among the elite of the Arab armies. In time, this Turkish military presence would soon prove indispensable and it would logically translate into political power.

Remember when Britain was the most powerful nation

I think 20-19. Th great britain 18.th France kingdom 17.th spain kingdom 16.th Ottoman (ı am from turkey)

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Spanish empire got defeated in 30 years war so no

Spanish Empire would have been the right one for the 16th/17th century

Dude lessss gooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 21st century power

I think Napoleon's France was strongest one in 19nt century

@PortugalZeroworldcup

5 ай бұрын

And Michel ney, Marquis Lafayette, Andre massena , Joachim Murat 🇨🇵later ferdinand foch

I saw the spelling of century and knew I couldnt take this video seriously.

How can you say that in the XVI and XVII the Otoman empire is the most powerfull?. In that centuries was the Spanish empire at all

@papazataklaattiranimam

Жыл бұрын

''Why are so many Spaniards bothered that Spain isn't here? It is true that the Spanish empire had strong periods, but the golden age of the Ottoman Empire was stronger than Spain both economically, politically and geographically. Capture of Algiers (1516) Ottomans won Algiers expedition (1541) Ottomans won Capture of Béjaïa (1555) Ottomans won Siege of Coron, Ottomans won Battle of Djerba, Ottomans won Battle of Formentera, Ottomans won Raid of the Balearic islands (1558) Ottomans won Siege of Castelnuovo, Ottomans won Fall of Tlemcen (1518) Ottomans won Conquest of Tunis (1574) Ottomans won Battle of Preveza, Ottomans won at the same time, the Ottomans were alone in Preveza. But the enemy army Venice, Papal States, Genoa, Spain, Mantua, Malta, Portugal[1][2][3] All of them was part of Holy League but Ottomans won against them. Also remember Süleyman the Magnificent's Venetian helmet . It was an elaborate headpiece designed to project the sultan's power in the context of the Ottoman-Habsburg rivalry. Meaning The four floors of the Crown also represent Solomon's goal of world conquest-reigning the North, the South, the East, and the West-as well as the Pope's famous triple crown and the Holy Roman Empire two years ago. It was a reference to Charles V, who was crowned as the German Emperor.🙂.''

В XV столітті я б поставила Франції 🇫🇷⚜️ (в якості перемоги в Столітній війні)

@tayfun7132

Жыл бұрын

Turks in that century destroyed the Roman empire and took Constantinapolis and they are invaded the Balkans and occupied Otranto on the Italian peninsula.

@abert1313

Жыл бұрын

А що не Гетьманщину с обосранным Полуботком?

@jeanpaul5749

Жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣la france

@widodoakrom3938

Жыл бұрын

Ming dynasty or ottoman empire stronger in 15 century

y donde figura el imperio chino

STRONG HISTORY COUNTRIES

China: I have master the art of being so idle, fighting only myself to the point no one remember being the richest or second richest nation for millennias. Ps: I know they invaded some, but those invasion were mostly quite pale in comparison.

@andreicristian9575

8 ай бұрын

Sad current China is a communist dictatorship. Such a rich and beautiful history.

@kumaraanu

3 ай бұрын

china wasnt idle, china was an essential part of silk route