The Strongest Country of every century (1st - 21st) Explained In 18 Minutes
Ойындар
00:00 1st-5th
01:24 6th
02:07 7th
02:44 8th-9th
03:21 10th
04:39 11st
05:51 12nd-13rd
06:28 14th
07:52 15th
09:38 16th
10:45 17th
11:21 18th
12:23 19th
14:24 20th
17:35 21st
Пікірлер: 727
Watch the full Adventure Time story (made by my friends) kzread.info/dash/bejne/gnmk2balaKyZm84.htmlsi=eZITcynnGut5cyqL
@Lp-army1
29 күн бұрын
1:36 byzantium wasnt established by Constantine it was an ancient thracian settlement
@albertopfontan6080
26 күн бұрын
The map in 1:46 is a fake , because explain how America appears on it if it had not been discovered yet.
@DailyDoseOfYT
25 күн бұрын
Islam>
@PRIMAL_HUNTER1988
12 күн бұрын
USA sucks is to woke an it will collapse
12th century: nothing changed 13th century: everything changed💀
@veonosizzz_yt87
28 күн бұрын
yep, Genghis Khan
@qbpdnguyen2844
18 күн бұрын
Tbh Eastern Rome during the 12th century deserves credit, the Komnenians are chads
@user-qo5mz3so7c
14 күн бұрын
True
The British were without a doubt the most powerful country in the 19th Century and that never got mentioned
@raptorbrotherhood766
13 күн бұрын
Cry about it 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅🦅🦅
@TheBestAlien
12 күн бұрын
@@raptorbrotherhood766America wasn't the strongest during that century bro what are you on about lmao
@Goofy_ahh_Grenadier
10 күн бұрын
@@raptorbrotherhood766 America was nowhere near the strongest in that century dumbass
@sanssucreajoute6554
10 күн бұрын
nah , napoleon was better
@davidtaylor3098
10 күн бұрын
@@sanssucreajoute6554 france was better for 15 years tops. 1800 to 1815. 1816 onwards Britian overtook
Intresting how the Ottomans stayed at the top for a long period of time
@batu3507
13 күн бұрын
250 years
@hailgerald2060
Сағат бұрын
@@batu3507 almost 300 i think
@batu3507
Сағат бұрын
@@hailgerald2060 they werent strongest in the 17th century
@hailgerald2060
Сағат бұрын
@@batu3507 my bad i was thinking bout the lifespan of that empire which was 600 yrs i think
@batu3507
Сағат бұрын
@@hailgerald2060 their lifespan were 622 years
"Byzantine" empire doesn't exist. It was not any continuation of the eastern roman empire. It WAS the eastern roman empire up until 476. After that it was THE Roman Empire.
@resentfuldragon
13 күн бұрын
And he was also horribly mistaken by claiming they were the strongest in the 9th century when people like Harun Rashid were decimating them.
@BigA678
2 күн бұрын
This is the dumbest comment I have ever seen 😂 “Nazi empire doesn’t exist it’s a continuation of Germany” you people are hilarious
@dziosdzynes7663
2 күн бұрын
@@BigA678 clueless
@enchanteddirt4580
16 сағат бұрын
Your right, it wasn't a continuation it was a completely seperate empire that rose after the fall of the roman empire. The greek Constantine who founded the empire considered him self to be greek not roman. And the empire began to spread the word of orthodox christianity NOT catholic christianity, So it was not even the roman empire at all.
It's always the external issues 💀
@drexplained0
29 күн бұрын
+ Internal
@miracleclone5793
21 күн бұрын
But indeed, internal issue was a huge problem for every empires back than
@giannisapostolopoulos4647
12 күн бұрын
@@miracleclone5793 especialy in the byzantine empire
1.- Spanish Empire didn't slave the indigenous natives. 2.- Spanish Empire hadn't colonies, they were Spain. 3.- Spanish Empire didn't steal gold. Only 20% went to Spain as taxes like IVA, the rest was used in their cities, roads, churchs,... 4.- Spanish Empire explored and stablished trade routes like Portuguese empire, why don't you mention it? Andrés de Urdaneta (discovered and plotted an easterly route across the Pacific Ocean), Juan Sebastian Elcano (completed the first circumnavigation of the Earth),... There are many more inconsistencies in this video on this topic.
@joekennedy4093
11 күн бұрын
Is this a joke or genuine brain rot? I can't tell anymore.
@raulgh
11 күн бұрын
@@joekennedy4093 you only need a book
@Phitend
10 күн бұрын
Oh in your schools they really teach you like this? Pathetic.
@raulgh
10 күн бұрын
@@Phitend Unfortunately no. They are teaching Spanish Black Legend.
@marcpress1537
9 күн бұрын
@@Phitend Read about the black legend
You’ve made a mistake : The French century is the XVIII-18th. The British century is the XIX-19th
🗿🇬🇷Byzantine Empire🤝🗿🇮🇷Sasanian Empire
@jaywee6430
20 күн бұрын
Rashidun caliphate jumpscare
@fayyadhfahmi8928
19 күн бұрын
@@jaywee6430Umayyad caliphate jumpscare
@Uran_KH-98
18 күн бұрын
Timurids, Ottoman, Golden horde: Traitor 😡 Sasanian Empire: 😒
@JacobIX99
13 күн бұрын
That's not the Sasanian empire flag
@fayyadhfahmi8928
13 күн бұрын
But there's no sasanian emoji
Poland overslept again
@leno_o17
11 күн бұрын
It wasn't expansionist
@johnharlanabila1740
3 күн бұрын
@@leno_o17 **ehem**
@leno_o17
3 күн бұрын
@@johnharlanabila1740 ??
@johnharlanabila1740
3 күн бұрын
@@leno_o17 ssssh you seen nothing about those edits alright
@leno_o17
3 күн бұрын
@@johnharlanabila1740 sorry I don't understand what you mean. Can you say it with the whole sentence?
10:44 Qing Dynasty ruled by the Manchurian not The Han. The Yuan Dynasty was ruled by the Mongolian
@Adil_Turysbek_TVRC
14 күн бұрын
3:03 and Tang dynasty was ruled by Turco-Mongols. Tang Taizong had a title "Tengri Khagan" "Celestial Holy Emperor".
Hidden gem of a channel!
love the memes was learning and laughing at the same time 😂
Cool vid. There are some mistakes, but overall its great for beginners
Thank you!
4:00 the earliest threat fun fact were the hungarians causing raids as west of italy 😮
Random empire: well, what can go wrong? Dr. explained: take some internal conflits and external pressures
@drexplained0
5 күн бұрын
LOL😭😞
Awesome memes subbed
Cool video man. I like your content a lot
@nibiru27
19 күн бұрын
Cool profile pic
@user-os2yp6ph2z
19 күн бұрын
@@nibiru27 You must love Big Brother. It is not enough to obey him: you must love him.
@nibiru27
19 күн бұрын
@@user-os2yp6ph2z literally 1984
@albertomartin3625
14 күн бұрын
con la foto esta todo dicho, anda lee e infórmate un poco, el vídeo esta lleno de imprecisiones y mentiras mal intencionadas
Wish you add the military budget for the US but great video!
@pxj16
Күн бұрын
Why?
@user-wm9cg4cy2x
15 сағат бұрын
@@pxj16 because it rounds at about $820.2 billion.
@pxj16
6 сағат бұрын
@@user-wm9cg4cy2x but how is it related to the video?
what bugged me is tye complete neglect of the dutch empire wich was incredibly powerfull during the 1600s they had almsot the entire spice trade, had a HUGE naval fleet (bigger then spain france and england's fleet combined) and ruled various colonies,
@albertomartin3625
14 күн бұрын
Poder económico y poco mas, vuestro poderío naval sería en buques mercantes, pero en el aspecto naval militar los galeones españoles no tenían rival salvo los buques de los británicos. A los españoles nos comíais los güevos, así que menos humos
@thecreaturebehindyou
14 күн бұрын
@@albertomartin3625 and thats why the dutch navy sailed up into the thames river,bombed half the brittish navy,and towed their biggest ship back to amsterdam with just economic power? no, they had many warships aswell
@albertomartin3625
14 күн бұрын
@@thecreaturebehindyou veo que teníais pelotas, unas cuantas veces desembarcamos los españoles en tierra de herejes también y nada hicieron por defenderlas, que pena que no fuimos aliados.
@broaddaybooter3119
13 күн бұрын
Do some research Portugal was the pioneer in the 1600s
@thecreaturebehindyou
12 күн бұрын
@@broaddaybooter3119 and that is why the dutch stole the entire spice trade from them?
The flag of the Confederation of the Rhine had a flag similar to Sierra Leone but with a darker shading
Great video thank you
Thank you for informations
@albertomartin3625
14 күн бұрын
desinformación, eso es lo que ha puesto en su video, busca y lee de los imperios que menciona y veras que muchas de las cosas que dice no son correctas
@James_new
3 күн бұрын
@@albertomartin3625yeah
napoleonic Empire *insert royalist here* Colonial Empire *insert napoleon here* wtf
0:12 0:13 added to my sabaton random images playlist
@drexplained0
Ай бұрын
LOL😭
1:46 maps in that time were way more advanced than that, it's just a religious representation.
Internal strife and external pressures got so many real ones 😢
Weird that you brought up decolonisation and the downfall of the British Empire in the 18th century, even though that didnt happen until the mid 20th century. Britain's strength and dominance only increased during the 19th century after defeating Napoleon and establishing itself as THE colonial empire in the world. Reaching it's territorial height of around 1/4 of the world's landmass in 1920.
@ghostpanter7796
25 күн бұрын
i think he just brings up every countries downfall and here he didn't mean that the British empire fell in the 18th century but rather that at one point it did fall
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
By 1920 it had already been weakened and increasingly displaced by other countries such as the USA. WW2 ended with the British
Bro forgor that Georgian empire existed in 12th century 💀
Very good speech
Not "NAZ" it was Germany
@guanjah8186
5 күн бұрын
Das Deutsche Reich. Dankeschön.
“I have ten million power in rise of kingdoms.”
12:51 "belgium" *circles netherlands* "netherlands" *points to north germany*
@drexplained0
Ай бұрын
LOL
@abdullahmalik267
Ай бұрын
u got a good eye ngl
13:33 Spain, dude,Spain ,☝🏼
@raulgh
14 күн бұрын
Él probablemente no sepa que la primera derrota napoleónica en campo abierto fue en la Bailén, o que un puñado de campesinos acabo con casi 300.000 soldados franceses en 6 años que duró la invasión, o no quiere comentarlo, viendo como ha hablado del imperio español.
Bro for real forgelot Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, a country that occupied Moscow 3 times, pushed Ottomans south while defending against their numerous invasions, and that at one point in history, it controlled entire central Europe with balkans thought PU.
Thats so nice towatch thanks body!
I think he did a good job explaining the US
5th century is definitely the huns and 9th would either be the abbasids or the carolangian empire their alliance could’ve easily collapsed Byzantium I don’t think it’s even close
@parthb.714
29 күн бұрын
Guptas defeated both Huns and Sassanins
@kumaraanu
28 күн бұрын
@@parthb.714 they were not much contribution from guptas to defeat huns, there were other small indian kingdoms who expelled hunns from india
Why do you explain some parts slowly?
The Byzantine Empire was my favorite… but I didn’t know that they believed that this what the world was like 💀☠️: 1:45
@RickBrode
20 күн бұрын
I don’t think that’s a Byzantine map and fairly legible early modern German is on it so it’s probably from like the 1500s or something
Very good.
You should mention the Kingdom of Poland, as it was one of the most powerful nations in Europe in it's golden ages. Around XV and XVII century
Britain was the most powerful force that has ever existed at its relative peak in the 19th century… how is it France?
The only thing that bugged me was that you didn't talk about the US territorys who aren't "states", but are also part of the united states.
@user-lh9cy5dt8q
Күн бұрын
Like Europe
@clexo2155
Күн бұрын
@@user-lh9cy5dt8q no not that, stuff like puerto rico
Iran was one of the most powerful countries in the world during the Safavid period
Where is the VOC??
Seljuks,Ottomans based. 🇹🇷
@King.Of.Persia
16 күн бұрын
Every where I go I see you fella 😶 One more time .... seljuks are 🇮🇷🇹🇷 not only 🇹🇷
@NationalistTurk.-nq1sb
16 күн бұрын
@@King.Of.Persia leader are Turks also Seljuks ancestors from🇹🇲. İran ?? İranian people just a living in the seljuks. Seljuks conquered the iran. Maybe a mixed Culture but Seljuks still🇹🇲🇹🇷🇦🇿 Turkic Empire but mixed iranian culture...
@King.Of.Persia
15 күн бұрын
@@NationalistTurk.-nq1sb mixed and become iranian , like safavid
@sonuncu203
10 күн бұрын
@@King.Of.Persia This should be a unifying factor, not a dividing one. Though i must say it isn't exactly like safavids
Very good video but I think you can also could mention about Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth if only because in XVII century Commonwealth have terriory from baltic sea to black sea and have a very strong army (Winged Polish Hussars), but the video is still very good :))
@Turco-Napolitano
27 күн бұрын
Ottoman empire was stronger that's why u guys attacked us from behind
@potato_guy138
12 күн бұрын
@@Turco-Napolitano didnt they fall on venice?????
@Turco-Napolitano
12 күн бұрын
@@potato_guy138 If u r talkin about Mora yes they also attacked from behind when we were dealing with Russian empire Austrian empire and polish empire alone after the war we took everything we lost
4 of the empires are Turkish (Seljuk, Ottoman, Mugal and Timurid)
@lacomplation
9 күн бұрын
Golden horde
@James_new
3 күн бұрын
@@lacomplationgolden horde was mongol
What does AC stand for? How's it different from AD (Anno Domini)?
@JustMilo702
22 күн бұрын
After Christ
Cant tell if this channel is one of those ai content farms or not
@oopsispilledmymilk7300
29 күн бұрын
The voice seems kinda fake, and there were definitely some AI images in there
@siyacer
26 күн бұрын
it definitely is
I think in 12th Century Cholamandalam Empire was the strongest empire. And it was declined at the end of 12th Century AD. Also, isn't Gupta Empire stronger in 3rd to 5th Century AD?
@kumaraanu
28 күн бұрын
yeah bro this person is terribly underestimating india. we had the more man power and bigger economy for most of the history
@noone2345il
18 күн бұрын
@@kumaraanu Having more economy and having more money doesn't mean that we are a superpower. And I'm not blaming the creator here because he might not have knew about Cholas. Everyone can have a mistake not only him. And everytime, India doesn't have to be the strongest country.
@noone2345il
18 күн бұрын
@@kumaraanu Cholas and their descendants (Dravidians) was never connected with India. Cholas never even knew about India. They only cared about Dravida Rajya (Dravidia) and Southeast Asia. So, Cholas aren't Indian they're Dravidians.
@noone2345il
18 күн бұрын
@@kumaraanu @Dr. Explained never underestimated India in any ways. He just only made a mistake which is basically common for any KZreadr.
Romans and the Turks dominated the history of the world. Anyone says otherwise either doesnt't know history or just straight jealous. End of the story.
@guanjah8186
5 күн бұрын
Musst du ja wissen. Dummer, Eifersüchtiger Mensch.
Explaning the real reason of the empires decline: Nahhh Saying it was because "internal conflits and external pressures": Hell Yeah!
Ottomans where strongest from 1450ad - 1750ad. So 1400s 1500s 1600s even arguably 1700s would go to them
You forgot that britiam after ww1 was at peak power
Would argue that in 19 century france was weaker than Brittain, or even Russia, Napolens genius and the revolution helped them, it wasnt france vs the world, it was the Ancien regimes vs the revolution, prussia beat Austria and France quite quickly, before forming the german empire, eclipsing even brittains's industry and might
Can you do the same for the bc period? Dehli sultnate replled the mongols and you forgot the Gupta empire who eventually beat back the Huns and was replaced by the rajput kingdoms who stopped both Arabs and Huns and Turks for a while
@rkdehart7351
Ай бұрын
Sure the Delhi Sultanate repelled the Mongols, but it was like their first point for the standings against the Mongols 20 if you know what I’m saying
@supremercommonder
Ай бұрын
@@rkdehart7351 no they also beat the rajput warriors and other rajput kingdoms
@supremercommonder
Ай бұрын
@@rkdehart7351 they repelled mongol inversions for a good 100 years
@supremercommonder
Ай бұрын
@williamFromBirmingham every Indian empire like Gupta was richer than Europe combined and Gupta was the golden age.
@indiafirst3676
28 күн бұрын
@williamFromBirmingham Gupta was a superpower in the 4th & 5th centuries. They defeated the Huns in Gupta-Hunnic War. These were the same Huns who had completely destroyed the Western Roman Empire. Not only militarily but also they were by far the largest economy in the world. Chess & Zero also originated from the Gupta Empire
how am i supposed to explain my source to my history teacher
@James_new
3 күн бұрын
Don't
@James_new
3 күн бұрын
Research yourself
Anyone else notice there’s like 4 channels exactly like this that literally make the exact same videos
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
Yes
I have a question why is Bengal Sultanate isn't consider a superpower in 14th 15th 16th 17th 18th century when it made 12% of global gdp in 14-15th century and 15% in 17-18th century and 3rd largest population and one of the best navy but Russian empire with a population less then even main land France and also poor was a Superpower??
@Supermasist
Ай бұрын
I don't know about the centuries, but I know they didn't exist in the later half of the 18th century
@jemoedermeteensnor88
Ай бұрын
They were a great power in India not in the world. Not to offend anybody but India has been a pretty backward country through its entire existence. The Mughals were a great power because it was by far the most populated country since China descided to collapse again. And the Timurids (partly India) were great because "Tamerlane" was a great military leader like Napoleon or Ghensis Khan.
@kumaraanu
28 күн бұрын
bengal sulthanate was a part of delhi sulthanate and mughal for a long time , in 1720s i think it got independence from mughal s but soon in 1757 bengal was annexed by british
@kumaraanu
28 күн бұрын
@@jemoedermeteensnor88 sounds like a typical westerner comment on south asia.
@AbidurRahman2212
27 күн бұрын
@@kumaraanu it was independent from mid1300s-late1500s and from early 1700s to mid 1700s and it was a vassal state semi independent under them
brother, charlemagne was the the first holy roman emperor...not otto...
Every Empire falls mostly due to Internal Strife.
3:30 Thats me!
@thewarlock108
11 күн бұрын
How are you? Long time no see😂
You forgot of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, in 17th century it was strongest country in the world that contained 90% of balkans, belarus, ukraine and some part of russia (including moscow 1610-1612) it had almost 1million km² and had scariest army (hussars)
@MarkhasSteelfort
18 күн бұрын
After Ottomans, yes. Their only major success against Ottomans was the 2nd Siege of Vienna and the army was a coalition so it wasn't just Poles. Ottomans were facing against combined major powers of Europe while the Commonwealth had regional rivalries were fighting against Ottomans occasionally. If the same European coalition hit the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth they would be annihilated.
@Sandomer21
18 күн бұрын
@@MarkhasSteelfort in general polish-lithuanian commonwealths army rank was 1 and i doubt ottomans would handle getting moscow while fighting with russia, polish-lithuanian commonwealth was also very much invaded and wont of course most wars, polish-lithuanian commonwealth solos ottomans
@MarkhasSteelfort
18 күн бұрын
@Sandomer21 You have got to be kidding me. Ottoman vassal Crimean Khanate burned Moscow few times. Also, history has shown that Ottomans fought against many coalitions and won. Their army structure is very organized and it is supported by a solid logistical system, which is legacy of Roman Imperial land system. The Commonwealth has never faced coalitions or crusades like the Ottomans did. Even with weakening Sultans, no one was able to match Ottoman power on land until 1700. I would say that after the Ottoman army, it is either the Spanish or the Polish Commonwealth land army that is strongest.
The china and India we're so underrated, no cap
@keannoxyrenceesquivel2349
3 күн бұрын
Nice grammar
@goebbels_got_no_balls
2 күн бұрын
@@keannoxyrenceesquivel2349 Who cares about grammar?
i like how the guy is neutral and doesnt disrespect any empire/dynasty etc
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
Doing so during part of the Spanish empire shows that Native Americans were slaves, When slavery was abolished in 1512 burgos laws
USA:IF GOD HAD WANTED U TO LIVE HE WOULS NOT HAVE CREATED ME!!!
De verdad piensas que el imperio otomano fue más importante que el imperio español 😂
yo is that a polish tortoise thumbnail lol
Iberian península its not just Spain thank you very much
love how the 19th century is just napoleon. Victorian era just not existing, Britain isn't a global superpower in the 19th century and Germany didn't kick France's ass in 1871.
notice how no one could conquer india till 17th century the power of indian dynasties like king Porus who defeated Alexander, Chandragupta who defeated satrapies, also samudra Gupta defeated Alexander in early 326 BCE
6:45 Truely the Swelly Orange the Magnificent
9:45 🇪🇦 9:50
failed to mention australia, sending a complaint to your parents.
Fun fact: the Spanish Empire and the Portuguese Empire once combinated by a few years, making it the biggest empire ever existed
@malal6891
9 күн бұрын
Es un canal anglosajón. La leyenda negra contra España es imperativo
I know what BC, BCE, AD, and CE are, but what is AC?
@drexplained0
Ай бұрын
After Christ, It's like AD
@michaelweiske702
Ай бұрын
@@drexplained0 how does AC relate to AD or CE?
@emryswilliams9190
Ай бұрын
It's supposed to mean Ante Christum, or before Christ in Latin. It's misused in this video.
Bro learn and research more history on the balkan peninsula before you start blasting bullshit
There's no Byzantine city since the beginning duh.
This is realistic but the Bulgarian empire in the 9th century defeated the Byzantine so i guess bulgaria should be it.
Máozédōng wànsuì. Zhōnghuá rénmín gònghéguó guāngróng lǐngxiù wànsuì! Zìyóu cànlàn de yángguāng yīn nǐ ér cànlàn. Láiyīn héhé shǐdálín. Shàngdì bǎoyòu gònghéguó
i would have to disagree with you on the British Empire id say there century was the 19th not the 18th as the Pax Britannica was 1815 to 1914
@SergioSP-kc8bd
29 күн бұрын
Yes, in the 18th century things were equal in Europe between the French, the British and the Spanish. From the beginning of the 19th century, Spain fell in level in terms of power compared to the other two.
@gordonmcintosh8333
29 күн бұрын
@@SergioSP-kc8bd I agree id say France was a little more powerful than Britain but the seven years war was the turning point
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
@@gordonmcintosh8333Remember that later France became the greatest power because of Napoleon, The Spanish empire in 1780-1805 planned a Hispanic "commonwealth" and gave independence in America and adapted, Ferdinand Vll, King of Spain, was the reason that Spain definitely lost any possibility of being a counterweight to the UK.
@gordonmcintosh8333
24 күн бұрын
@@Galletas-my3sv of course under Napoleon the French were the power but that for was 15 years of the 19th century the other 85 Britain was the power and while i understand Napoleon was not beat by Britain alone he did lose
@danielguerrero894
20 күн бұрын
@@SergioSP-kc8bd En el siglo XVIII España fue el escudero de Francia,mucho territorio pero no estaba en primera fila.
The fact pre-columbian civilizations fell was because the same pre-columbians who attacked the mayor civilizations, and 300 horses
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
Fake
@crushingwasledghammer66
24 күн бұрын
@@Galletas-my3sv fake is your father figure
@Galletas-my3sv
24 күн бұрын
@@crushingwasledghammer66 Boy, besides, they weren't civilizations, they were states.
Can't wait to see some kazaks trying to claim golden horde because they was majority of population
First Bulgarian Empire left the chat.
Britain was absolutely the strongest country of the 19th century and not France
@grandmanitou6563
15 күн бұрын
To be honest while Britain was very rich it never had quite the same military might or cultural influence even at it's peak, in fact it is already very generous to give it the spot of "strongest" just for it's economic prowess. The most questionnable place would be the Russians, as they surely never reached the top in any significant indicator albeit perhaps population.
@sergiombala3290
14 күн бұрын
It took the whole europe to beat france. Later france beat russia china along britain only one defeat agains what will become germany and accomplished that while being what russia it currently is a strong power with no ally
@TheFearsomePredator
14 күн бұрын
The British empire have no proof of being the "strongest" as it did ALL of his war with the need and help of France. Also unlike the British empire, the French empire was fighting all of Europe even after a revolution and it didn't had colonies to support it at that time(except little islands in Americas)
@padriandusk7107
13 күн бұрын
France was amongst the strongest in Europe during the Sun King's rule and Napoleon's rule, but the tricky part is it didn't last a whole century.
@justarandomguy1288
11 күн бұрын
Yea British would be the 19th century and French would be 18th
The Han Dynasty should've been on the list
Parthian and Sassanian are the both Persian with Persian culture
Where british, im not british but like bruh imagine not mentioning the largest empire to ever exist... :/
2:53 thats the flag of Penghu county of Taiwan lmao
First and Second Bulgarian Empires left the chat
@BulgarEmpireBall-IYI
29 күн бұрын
@Atakan-ln2xv your not important to society 😑
@BulgarEmpireBall-IYI
29 күн бұрын
@Atakan-ln2xv your mom doesn't love you, your dad left you, your grandma doesn't love you and you'll grow up to be Adam Sandler
Why in the blue hell is spainball wearing a somebrero??? Wouldn't a tricorn hat or a conquistador helmet be far more accurate?
YOU ARE A FUCKING LEGEND
11:21 Whoever made the meme should go and learn more about history. The one that replaced Qing dynasty is the Republic of China (ROC), not People’s Republic of China (PRC), so wrong flag.
Ottoman empire =Turkey 🇹🇷 Timurid empire =Uzbekistan 🇺🇿 Seljuk empire=Turkmenistan 🇹🇲
@batu3507
Сағат бұрын
turkic domination also add mughal empire
XVI: Otomanos-Españoles-Portugueses XVII: Españoles XVIII Españoles, Británicos y Franceses XIX: Británicos XX: Usa y URSS
Spanish black legend.
@marcpress1537
9 күн бұрын
Facts
mistake 4:22 thats a map of the frankish kingdom