He sounds like yoda

@stLegion-qb9bx

5 жыл бұрын

Veerasundar Veluswamy Young Yoda

I'm incredibly pleased that I was able to find this channel. Your historical explanations are very clear, and (as far as I can tell) relatively unbiased towards any side. That combined with the excellent production values makes your videos incredibly interesting to watch and valuable as resources.

@Spooksandooks

6 жыл бұрын

ninjainthebasement thank you so much 😄 We are happy you found us too!

@davu5637

2 жыл бұрын

South China Sea Dispute There has been a lot of articles South China Sea (SCS) dispute and China’s 9 Dash Line articles in recent time, with a majority of them twisting facts and trying to claim that China is bullying smaller countries with their growing military might when China is simply trying to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. In 1946 at the end of WW2 it was a US Navy battleship that took Chinese soldiers to reclaim all the islands that are currently under dispute in the SCS as China simply lacked capable ship at the time. Thus, the original R.O.C 11 Dash Line was drawn in 1947 after China recovered all the islands, the 11 Dash Line linked all the islands together to clearly mark China territorial waters which was at the time recognized by the American and international community. The 11 Dash Line was only reduced to the 9 Dash Line when China secretly transferred Bach Long Vi in the Gulf of Tonkin from China to Vietnam in 1957 so that the island could host a new radar base to provide an early warning of American planes and to serve as a transitional post for Vietnam incoming war aid material as the Vietnam War escalated. It was a goodwill and war aid material from China to support Vietnam against the US invasion. From this, we can tell how ungrateful and traitorous the Vietnamese are with their current aggressive stances toward China. Furthermore, all historical document sign by or involved any of the countries associated with the current disputes didn't lay any claim to any of the island involved in the current SCS dispute. For example: - In the 1898 Paris Treaty signed between America and Spain, both countries acknowledged that none of the disputed islands belong to the Philippines as the Philippines territory extends to the east of east meridian 118 while the dispute islands laid west of east Meridian 118. - In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender contained the following statement: ‘’the Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and such minor islands as we determine,” as had been announced in the Cairo Declaration in 1943; which clearly stated it didn't include Diaoyu Islands. In addition, the Cairo Declaration in 1943 also clearly stated all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese shall be restored to the Republic of China (that represented China at the time) and these documents were signed with Chinese participation. The American recognition of the 11 Dash Line lasted until San Francisco Conference in 1951 when the American specifically excluding China from the conference as the Communist Party in China-controlled most of mainland China at the time and proclaimed the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949. At the San Francisco Conference, the American made unilateral arrangement in an attempt to deny Chinese ownership of their islands that was previously international recognised belonging to China and put all these islands into a dispute. However, at the time no one including the current neighbouring claimants bothered to dispute China's claim to these islands and reefs, but China also did not have the ability to consistently enforce its sovereignty to these islands due to lack of military power and internal weakness caused by WW2 and the Civil War. Neighbouring states only started to violate China's claim, occupying certain islands and reefs when it was speculated that the South China Sea might contain oil and gas. For example: - During the San Francisco Treaty of 1951 in the absence of China and with the support of the American, the Philippine claim ownership of the disputed island, nevertheless the Philippine did not declare ownership of the disputed islands until late 1970 by self-proclamation. - The America took over the administrative duty of Diaoyu Islands at San Francisco Conference from China and promised to relay it to UN which they never did. The American kept the administrative rights until 1971 then transfer the administrative control of the islands to Japan at the opposition of China. - The rest of the disputed is laid according to the 1994 United Nation Convention of Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 200 nautical mile EEZs which didn't come into existence until 47 years after the establishment of dash-lines and International laws generally don't have judicial to things which preceded it. Therefore it shouldn't be applied here in the first place. Once again all the dispute was supported by the American and the American even announced that “The United States has a national interest in freedom of navigation, open access to Asia's maritime commons, and respect for international law in the South China Sea”. The United States has also called for unfettered access to the area that China claims as its own, and accused Beijing of adopting an increasingly aggressive stance on the high seas. The American has also frequently sent warships into the disputed area on so call Freedom of Navigation Operations. Now if we look at historical evidence we can further assure China claims to these islands and the 9 or 11 Dash Line. Diaoyu Islands - China claimed the discovery and ownership of the islands from the 14th century and the first Chinese records of these islands date back to as early as the 15th century when they were referred as Diaoyu Dao. While the Japanese maintained ownership of the islands from 1895 until its surrender at the end of World War II which ownership should have been returned to China according to the Cairo Declaration. In the 1945 Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender also contains this statement. Spratly and Paracel Islands - The earliest written record of the Spratly Islands can be found in documents dating from the Eastern Han Dynasty 25 AD and The earliest written record of the Paracel islands can be found in historical documents dating from the Song Dynasty 960 AD. The 1887 Chinese-Vietnamese Boundary convention signed between France and China after the Sino-French War states that China was the owner of the Spratly and Paracel islands. The Qing dynasty also sent naval forces on inspection tours in 1902 and 1907 and placed flags and markers on the islands. The Qing dynasty's successor state, the Republic of China, claimed the Spratly and Paracel islands under the jurisdiction of Hainan. The Japanese occupied the Paracels and the Spratlys from February 1939 to August 1945, which was handed back to the Republic of China at the end of WW2 according to the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations. In summary, all evidences support China 9 Dash Line historical and sovereignty claim in the South China Sea. However, it has been continuously undermined with the support of the US in their greed and ambition of controlling the world energy resources, world hegemony and containment of China’s rise. International laws and organizations such as the UN are just becoming tools for the US and are no longer performing the traditional roles that they were created for in the first place. If we use the same standard of argument used against China in the SCS then the international community need to do a lot more American occupation and military bases in Guam, Diego Garcia and other Pacific islands. Additionally information: A special thank to Gerald Tan US State Dept Chief of Spatial Geography and Boundary Analysis, Daniel Dzurek, who works as a professional geographer with distinction on this exact subject; from his book "The Spratly Islands dispute: Who's on First": "Because the Allies, in particular the United Kingdom and the United States, could not agree on which government represented China, no Chinese delegation participated in the 1951 San Francisco Peace Conference. Therefore the Republic of China (Taiwan) negotiated a separate peace treaty with Japan, signed on 28 April 1952. Article 2 of the text included a reference to the San Francisco treaty: “It is recognized that under Article 2 of the Treaty of Peace with Japan signed in the city of San Francisco in the United States of American on September 8 1951, Japan has renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan (Formosa) and Penghu (the Pescadores) as well as the Spratly Islands and Paracel Islands”. Republic of China has argued that the explicit reference to the Spratly and Paracel islands in the text of this bilateral treaty implies Japanese recognition of Chinese sovereignty. Samuels and Lu have observed that, unlike the 1951 treaty, the Sino-Japanese text mentions the Spratly and Paracel islands in thesame sentence as Taiwan and the Pescadores islands. The latter are generally recognized as Chinese territories. Moreover, according to the negotiating record Japan insisted that the renunciation article deal only with Chinese territory. This shows that the ROC and Japan viewed the islands of Taiwan, the Pescadores, the Spratlys, and the Paracels as having a similar status - that is, belonging to China" US State Dept South China Sea expert Ambassador Chas Freeman who served for decades in the region, regarding China's claim to the SCS: "In 1945, in accordance with the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and with American help, the armed forces of the Republic of China government at Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared both archipelagoes to be part of Guangdong Province. In 1946 it established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys." Viet Nam Bach Long Vi Island history thediplomat.com/2019/08/the-south-china-sea-island-china-gave-away/

This video missed an important point: China is the earliest sovereign state to discover and map these islands, using them with fishing and maritime silk route as early as Tang Dynasty at 7 AD. Your second mistake is using a European medieval square rig boat symbol instead of a Chinese junk rig symbol. These shows that this video is either biased or lacking detail research.

@francissantos7448

3 жыл бұрын

Historical fake news

In 1945, in accordance with the Cairo and Potsdam Declarations and with American help, the armed forces of the Republic of China government at Nanjing accepted the surrender of the Japanese garrisons in Taiwan, including the Paracel and Spratly Islands. Nanjing then declared both archipelagoes to be part of Guangdong Province. In 1946 it established garrisons on both Woody (now Yongxing / 永兴) Island in the Paracels and Taiping Island in the Spratlys. France protested. The French tried but failed to dislodge Chinese nationalist troops from Yongxing Island (the only habitable island in the Paracels), but were able to establish a small camp on Pattle (now Shanhu / 珊瑚) Island in the southwestern part of the archipelago. In 1950, after the Chinese nationalists were driven from Hainan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), they withdrew their garrisons in both the Paracels and Spratlys to Taiwan. In 1954 France ceased to be a factor when it accepted the independence of both south and north Vietnam and withdrew from Indochina. In 1956 North Vietnam formally accepted that the Paracel and Spratly islands were historically Chinese. About the same time, the PLA reestablished a Chinese garrison on Yongxing Island in the Paracels, while the Republic of China (Taipei) put troops back on Taiping Island in the Spratlys. But, that same year, South Vietnam reopened the abandoned French camp on Shanhu Island and announced that it had annexed the Paracel archipelago as well as the Spratlys. In 1974 South Vietnam attempted to enforce its claims to sovereignty by placing settlers in the Spratlys and expelling Chinese fishermen from the southwestern Paracels. In the ensuing naval battle at Shanhu Island, China defeated Vietnamese forces. This enabled Beijing to extend its control to the entire Paracel archipelago, where it has not been effectively challenged since.

@hawklee1983

5 жыл бұрын

Good explanation, bro.

@kinglay8022

5 жыл бұрын

FreeLunch ForChildren Good explanation,The Cairo declaration is Signed in white paper and black ink.

@ayenunu

5 жыл бұрын

I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR YOU..(FOR EXAMPLE) IF YOU GOING COOK WITH FIREWOOD..ARE YOU GOING TO GET A FIREWOOD IN YOUR NEIGHBOUR OR IN YOUR OWN KITCHEN?..MEANING...ALL THE AREA NEAR YOUR PLACE WAS BELONG TO YOU...Got it!!! IDIOT!

@nikitavarsava8350

5 жыл бұрын

So you don't bring to the international court The Hague to settle ? You use the force to solve the problem like Japanese ?

@supermannnnn

4 жыл бұрын

@@arthurle288 your a dumb shit. So is your grandparents.

fantastic video , which software do you use for editing or effect ?

Very well explained , each n every details chronologically. We are living the world of stupidity where nonsense videos & channels are growing popularity. This channel deserve more subscribers

wow great videos. Sir which software you are using to make such awesome animated videos??

This was a good explanation, well-researched and non-bias perspective. Kudos

How did you get Yoda to moderate your video?

Neutral and comprehensive point of view. Thanks for the video!

@santih2569

4 жыл бұрын

Additional: Philippines is a sea faring nation and china was not a maritime power until recently. When they do trade with Philippines in ancient times, Filipinos would be the navigators. Philippines added some shoals on to their maps 200+ years before China put out their 9 dash line. China do not even explored all the areas and used a british maps and translated the names to chinese. They did not even know the meaning of a shoal before and claimed that their southernmost territory is james shoal. Islands can be part of a territory of a nation but not shoals, reefs or rocks.

The part of China's claim over the South China Sea before 1909 is inadequate. At the time of the Ming Dynasty, Chinese navy already patrolled the South China Sea to ward off pirates. And Chinese did not shun from the South China Sea. Even today the fishermen in China still kept a sea chart called Kan Lo Chi, which records all the sea routes in South China Sea to which they netvigate every year to carry out fishing. And there were semi-permanent settlement of Chinese in Spratley Islands going back hundreds of years, and which were destroyed by the Philippines in the 1970s. Chinese claim is not based on "recent discovery of oil", but based on history.

@hawklee1983

5 жыл бұрын

@ToiYeuYAHWEH You are Vietnamese? You should know that SCS now is claimed by various countries here not only by China, right? I guess, if China leaves, you Vietnamese would also fight against Philippines, Indonesia, etc. Am I right? So, please stop showing hypocrisy and yelling like a giant baby. If you want to occupy SCS as your own, please have some balls under your pants and wage war on China, okay? If you can't, then take those facts and eat it.

@hahahahahahahahahaha7959

5 жыл бұрын

Do you know Vietnam call Jing Hai Jun in Tang Dynasty(618-907) and independent from China in Song Dynasty(960-1279)?hahhh, Vietnam belongs to China BEFORE CHRIST!

@studlyhungwell5740

5 жыл бұрын

Chinese Navy....? Are you serious Chiuo Lini Where was this Navy during WW2?

@samquan8120

5 жыл бұрын

@@hahahahahahahahahaha7959. Actually at the beginning the han chinese is come from Vietnamese people. Baiyue/Bachviet build up china and ruled china at first. China is yue/viet country origin. Vietnamese is Chinese same father ancestor shennong/thannong. The China history only 5000 yrs. Vietnam history is 7000 yrs. Vietnam is older than China 2000 yrs.... At 1644 Manchu occupy china already. Today manchuria get china? The real Han chinese has no country today is lost to Qing Dynasty of Manchu People?

@bexjf1143

4 жыл бұрын

@@studlyhungwell5740 It was destroyed by Japanese Navy at 1895 and 1897. Before that, Chinese navy(QIng dynasty navy) was top 3 in Asia.

awesome explanation as always thank you 😀

@Spooksandooks

6 жыл бұрын

Thank you, a lot more videos coming your way!

@chocoluver18

5 жыл бұрын

china doest own it

@chocoluver18

5 жыл бұрын

Lawarance Young no one trust china because your country is popular for invading and greedyness

The basis of owning the South China Sea is more on who control it, by use of guns and bullets. South China Sea should belong to countries geographically located in the area.

@Joo-vw9kb

6 ай бұрын

Guam is 12,000 km from the US. The winner took it all. You can cry about it some more if you want for all I care LOL!

Thanks this really helped

TBH it was a beautiful story telling You got a new sub and like Friend👍

Superbly produced video. Congrats !

US ,Russai and China must sit down to talk peace

Watching in California. Thank you for the upload.

@Spooksandooks

6 жыл бұрын

Senor Frog love from India!

malaysia vietnam and the Philippines is the true owner of Spratly... no doubt international maps tells no lie

Very good explanation!

Thanks sir well explained

You want to tell South China Sea story? ask Zheng He (Chinese: 鄭和; 1371-1433 or 1435) first. Anyway, congratulation to this smart Indian, he has successfully draw a lot of attention and earn "click" for this half true story.

You forgot to mention that in 1958, Vietnamese prime minster, Pham Van Dong(Ho Chi Minhs right hand man) signed a diplomatic letter which acknowledges that Vietnam recognises China's claim over the spratlys and paracel islands. It is illegal under international law to give recognition and then take it away later unilaterally. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1958_diplomatic_note_from_phamvandong_to_zhouenlai.jpg No one ever mentions this when it pretty much invalidates Vietnamese claims. Phillipines has no historical claims, and the rest is also weak. China has the strongest historical claims.

@lewis24988

4 жыл бұрын

First and foremost, the diplomatic letter mentioned nothing about the two island groups. The letter was only meant to support China's claim of the 12 nautical miles of sovereign sea from its coast as clearly stated in the writing. No interpretation was made with regards to the China's claim of controlled land. To put things in context, 1958 was the first year the international community convened to discuss about law of sea. The US proposed the 3- nautical mile territory while China wanted 12. Being a communist regime, the North Vietnam certainly showed supports for the "big brother" China. Such diplomatic support though should bear no legal binding. Another thing to consider is that in 1958, there were two internationally recognized governments in Vietnam. According to the 1954 Geneve Agreement of which China was a signatory, the Paracels and Spratlys belong to the South Vietnam government and not the North. Did China then go back on her own words? All in all, if China believes Vietnam has violated any international laws, wouldn't it be plausible to have the matter resolved at an international court? I am always perplexed by China's adamance in avoiding an international jury. As a powerful country how can you claim that the whole developed world is biasly against you and yet you try to convince much smaller countries to trust in you to do bilateral negotiations? Regardless of the dispute over the island group, China's 9-dash line claim is outright baseless. China refuses to recognize both the international law of the sea (UNCLOS 1982) and historical claims. Without a common international protocol or historical facts, how should any country hope to have a fair negotiation with the superpower China?

@dekaaizer2550

3 жыл бұрын

@@lewis24988 neither does the USA recognize the law of the sea. And taking it to the international court which is based in the Netherlands is just flat out stupid. The international court is western based and heavily influenced by America.

This Video Ignored the Philippines Historical rights during 15th Century map and 10th Century tallano family as the philippine royal family.

@MrLangam

3 жыл бұрын

Because those are fake news.

good one... thnx...

please read about the Monroe Doctrine on the Caribbean Seas.

Where is the murillo velarde map?

When there is oil there is confrontation.. that why it's called Cursed Gold!

I love all your videos!! Need more videos at a faster rate please!!

@Spooksandooks

6 жыл бұрын

Sachin Mathad thank you! Suggestion taken! Working on it

Phillippines was ruled by Spain for 333 years . Why talk only of china and vietnam. Maps of Spain will show you that spratly and scarborough belongs to Phillippines.

yeah tht right so many country claim in world war in pirates

The South China Sea is one of the most controversial region's in the present days.

Please explain the meaning of your chanel name?

then why did you lost to the international court?

Didn’t know yoda was a history buff

Theres no mention of the 1734 Murillo Velarde map showing that the Spratly islands are part of the Philippines. The 9_line claim of China appeared only their maps around the 1940s.

@Joo-vw9kb

6 ай бұрын

SCS has been coined 2,700 years ago, Google it. Guam is 12,000 km from the US. The winner took it all. You can cry about it some more if you want for all I care LOL!

Additional: Philippines is a sea faring nation and china was not a maritime power until recently. When they do trade with Philippines in ancient times, Filipinos would be the navigators. Philippines added some shoals on to their maps 200+ years before China put out their 9 dash line. China did not even explored all the areas and used british maps and translated the names to chinese. They do not even know the meaning of a shoal before and claimed that their southernmost territory is james shoal. Islands can be part of a territory of a nation but not shoals, reefs or rocks.

spratly island is part of the EEZ of the philippines

Where is the old ph map?!?

Great video but you missed the big part where during few last years of Vietnam War, South Vietnam control most of Paracel and Spratly Islands, seeing South Vietnam been weakened other countries like China, Taiwan, Philipines steal many of the islands. South Vietnam tried to retake but without the US support and approval they fail to reclaim their fathers land.

@fcarsenal001

6 жыл бұрын

One of the battle is called "Trận Hải Chiến Hoàng Sa".

@little9draganchan515

6 жыл бұрын

totally opposite story. Gee ... no wonder peace could not last long, all news/history can be manipulated after few decades.

The OLD NAME of the South China Sea = "CHAMPA SEA". It was known by navigators throughout Asia as the Champa Sea FOR CENTURIES, named for an Austronesian CHAM ethnic's great empire that controlled all of central Vietnam, from the northern border of today's Quang Binh Province to roughly the southern border of Binh Thuan Province. But the empire/kingdom already colonized/absorbed into Vietnam totally/fully in 1832 AD. Read here: news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/06/140616-south-china-sea-vietnam-china-cambodia-champa/

@ToiYeuYAHWEH

6 жыл бұрын

W Keyz, Thank you for the National Geographic article!!! This proves the islands have ALWAYS belonged to Vietnam and NEVER china, the murderous THIEF!!

Philipines owns that look at the old map 1700 hundreds lol

You forgot to mention that Philippines have Murrillo Velarde from 1734 this shows the legal based of Philippines to claimed Scarborough Shoal and Spratlys Island

@Joo-vw9kb

6 ай бұрын

Guam is 12,000 km from the US. The winner took it all. You can cry about it some more.

@Wumao_Buster

6 ай бұрын

@@Joo-vw9kb Well if you use that logic at present time, prepare for a War!!!

The history of South China Sea does not start in China, cause' back then most people in china are farmers and the Philippines are fisherman's. Remember, the Philippines is a country of islands, (During pre-hispanic era) Filipino's were said to be proficient on building ocean going vessels!

@nigelgrantlee8412

2 жыл бұрын

The 9 dash line was intruduced in 1949, reaserch for "Marillo Map". This map was a Philippine map intruduced by a priest in 1734, and islands are also named in the Marillo Map. (We call Marillo Map "Father of all Philippine map".

@Joo-vw9kb

6 ай бұрын

Guam is 12,000 km from the US. The winner took it all. You can cry about it some more if you want for all I care LOL!

@kimmyDaYang

Ай бұрын

@@Joo-vw9kb so you trying to say is??

That right.. Vietnam country said 17th century.. 300 years ago is belong to Le and Nguyen dynasty. At that time no one else own that and there is no other nation claim that.. At that time Philippine Malaysia Brunei Singapore Indonesia is just a island is possessions by Spainish and Portuguese in 1580, they are not winner.. .China is occupy control by Qing dynasty of Manchu people. Only Vietnam win the French power.

you r great

@Spooksandooks

6 жыл бұрын

Silent Padhai thanks a lot!

Chinese government should put up some More facts to prove their claim. let more people see and understand the situation. may it to be peace

We filipinos have rights in spratly because we are the closest country in spratly and our ancient traviling in that area thoundsand years ago

The admin is wrong. Spratly belongs to the phollippines during its occupstion from 1500. Refer to maps ot the phillippines during spanish time. You are trying to right the wrong.

Sorry I fell asleep. Tank u beri march.

Love spooks and dookz

How did US get Hawaii?

@user-wr5sr1ev8j

5 жыл бұрын

The overthrow of Hawaii by the United States is as simple as that.

Dateline: Sept 11, 2020 Trump administration has declared support for the 2016 Hague tribunal ruling against the 9-dash line.

Yeah Philippines! 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭 U r awsome!

Humans is bad in SHARING

What did the spanish occupy in the spratlys. This is ony about chinese and vietnam. See the spanish maps.

Need different voice Please

the explanation of history is clear , the open sea that you called is your traditional fishing ground since in time of limahong more over , you claim the entire sea because of your fishing ground , but can you check the land mass of your land called CHINA its far far away , the chinese fisherman habitually fishing as far as they want , because they want the fish quality , because of this as your play ground , you want to claim the entire sea, what about the pacific ocean , why chinese fisherman not claim the entire pacific ocean , if you are claiming the oldest fishing ground why did not your fisherman discover the land of Guam if you are the oldest fisher.

Spratly island is part of Philippines 🇵🇭

@andrie1355

6 жыл бұрын

Grim Reaper ,yes. Some island is just Miles Away from Palawan Province

@chookyrobert973

5 жыл бұрын

Don't have to invite US and Western ideology to our neighbourly Asian member. That can cause toxicity, chaos, destabilised and many other negative elements. We Asian able to handle peacefully among our self through dialogue and talk make this region progress.M ake PEACE!. Not created misunderstanding to break up Asian that had done good improve relation without outsider interference about SCS. Look & remember in past history, the US and European done had colonized almost Asian countries:-Laos,Vietnam,Cambodia,Myanmar,Malaysia,Singapore ,Philippine ,Indonesia except Thailand had not been ruled by Western, Japan. Even very very small country=Portugal able to rule Macao, almost all other European controlled Asia. We try to avoid chaos to go back poorer. Take more chance for Asian to change a better life than the Western world in future. People don't have to go overseas to work due victimized. Enough suffering during past history.

@mecanopasensa660

5 жыл бұрын

Grim Reaper sprattly Islands and Philiphines aee part of China aswell. And all Islands around them. Politics caused all China splits, the Mongolians were the first Race that rulled there, and all became later China, the Japanesse got mixed with wars with England and from there started revolution. Cause of brittish Empire. Mayority of today Japanesse are mixed with English, same as Jews are. During world wars mixing created politics. And a World made by new Empires came into a new Enigma of a world Order by the dominance of the new Empires of a new era. Their politics of war; invassion and claim started a new way of getting land and resourses, claims written in a Particular place of incription of lands ownership in Europe. If you own a place, land you had to register this land for ownership. But must be recongnaized by certain republic states powers. So China was there before all look alike Races. Know well, if they a good look in a mirror who their symilar to wom in appearance. So In history China have the right to be owner of "The South China Sea" cause it bears it's owner name. History tells that.

@chookyrobert973

5 жыл бұрын

Your facts are totally irreverent and different story. What history had facts you learn? Search more hard to correct the history of China. Did you know about Philippine history?Here:History between the U.S. and the Philippines during and after the Spanish-American War. The Philippines became a colony of the U.S. after the Spanish-American War until 1946 and since its independence; U.S. forces retaliated by targeting Filipino citizens, they forced interrogations upon the Filipino population and tortured suspected rebels. General Malvar along with his wife, children and close to 3,000 rebels had surrendered on April 16th, 1902 as the Scorched Earth Policy began to take a toll on the population. That same month, the U.S. Military went on to establish concentration camps known as “reconcentrados.” Close to 300,000 Filipinos were forced into concentration camps in the province of Batangas resulting in the deaths of more than 8,000 Filipinos. Torture methods such as ‘water boarding’ or what was known then as “the water cure” were also used against prisoners to gain intelligence on the rebels.Genocide and the Philippines-American War www.globalresearch.ca/genocide-and-the.../5578125 "Propaganda and terror: the business of America is business"Americans launched an aggressive war of conquest against the Spanish Empire, which had neither attacked nor threatened the US, and crushed the Philippines’ independence movement, killing some 200,000 Filipinos in the process. "Everyone knows .US is the main perpetrator, "It's an unprecedented level of NWO"interrupting peaceful maritime commerce - this by the self-proclaimed protector of freedom of navigation,Here no jurisdiction at all. B4 a war3 start, better review all your obsolete weapons, do more research on Hyper sonic weapon and other missiles which you do not have to challenge ,China is ready for you. China does not want to attack them but prepares a very strong powerful defense by this transformation here for PEACE .

@chookyrobert973

5 жыл бұрын

Your facts are totally irreverent and different story. What history had facts you learn? Search more hard to correct the history of China. France recognised the islands, as well as the Spratly Islands,as well as the Paracel Islands to the north as sovereign Chinese territory after the 1884-1885 Sino-French war. In 1933 the French stabbed China in the back and seized the islands but were then displaced by the Japanese in 1938. The islands reverted to Chinese control at the end of the Second World War. Did you know about Philippine history?Here:History between the U.S. and the Philippines during and after the Spanish-American War. The Philippines became a colony of the U.S. after the Spanish-American War until 1946 and since its independence; U.S. forces retaliated by targeting Filipino citizens, they forced interrogations upon the Filipino population and tortured suspected rebels. General Malvar along with his wife, children and close to 3,000 rebels had surrendered on April 16th, 1902 as the Scorched Earth Policy began to take a toll on the population. That same month, the U.S. Military went on to establish concentration camps known as “reconcentrados.” Close to 300,000 Filipinos were forced into concentration camps in the province of Batangas resulting in the deaths of more than 8,000 Filipinos. Torture methods such as ‘water boarding’ or what was known then as “the water cure” were also used against prisoners to gain intelligence on the rebels.Genocide and the Philippines-American War www.globalresearch.ca/genocide-and-the.../5578125 "Propaganda and terror: the business of America is business"Americans launched an aggressive war of conquest against the Spanish Empire, which had neither attacked nor threatened the US, and crushed the Philippines’ independence movement, killing some 200,000 Filipinos in the process. "Everyone knows .US is the main perpetrator, "It's an unprecedented level of NWO"interrupting peaceful maritime commerce - this by the self-proclaimed protector of freedom of navigation,Here no jurisdiction at all. B4 a war3 start, better review all your obsolete weapons, do more research on Hyper sonic weapon and other missiles which you do not have to challenge ,China is ready for you. China does not want to attack them but prepares a very strong powerful defense by this transformation here for PEACE .

Southeast Asian countries have rights in the South China Sea. But they are too weak to claim their rights. China is so strong

@MrPoornakumar

6 жыл бұрын

Nothing like what you say, Tiny Characters in a Huge World ! They (Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, Philipiines AND Taiwan should make a common appeal & claim) & mass their navies in the International waters. The court case won by Philippines will crystallise into this action. SCS (South China Sea ) in fact is very similar to North Sea where all the littoral countries drew lines in the map & peacefully drilling for oil. SCS littoral countries should cite it as the model here.

@ToiYeuYAHWEH

6 жыл бұрын

Then evil china MUST BE TOTALLY DESTROYED

@tommyle4905

5 жыл бұрын

China never be strong , the islands belong to vn

@chocoluver18

5 жыл бұрын

Tiny Characters in a Huge World world will start again for war if your believe that a person must have GUN to win the property that belong to others when we based on uniclose/ legal distance for sovereignty obviouslyphilippines and vietnam is the nearest and god trusted spratly to vietnamese and philippines thats why the spratly is in viet and philippines souverinity 200 nautical miles -within territorial

Well I own from here to there. As soon as my boys return CCP and Xi are Peking bound. I'll let johnny dep have a island 🏝️. But otherwise no Peking. Hey this regime has been around since WW2 their claims don't mean shit. I remember that a different Chinese fought off the Japanise.

We do not even know what kind of history India have how this Indian guy can talk about history of south China Sea

It will be good for all countries involved in the region if China will be driven out of the SCS. No country should grab and own the SCS unilaterally because it's an international waterway. However countries sorrounding it should all be entitled to their EEZ mandated by the United Nation.

@Joo-vw9kb

6 ай бұрын

Guam is 12,000 km from the US. The winner took it all. You can cry about it some more if you want for all I care LOL!

Thats not true sea are no one own that sea international sea.China too much dreaming .scharbourough are very near to Philippine and spratley.fake story.

MAn made island

If China will abide by the UNCLOS mandate it cannot claim the whole sea, so what the Chinese did they constructed many artificial islands scattered all over the place to bolster their claim. But building man-made islands in the middle of the sea and even fortifying them with military structures will not qualify China for a bigger Exclusive Economic Zones as ruled by Arbitral Tribunal in The Hague. The ruling as declared states that China's claim has no legal and historical basis. China's island building is not admissible in the court as evidence for right to claim.

你们说啥就是啥吧，我嘴炮没有你们响，但中国南海属于菲律宾先问问我的航母和电磁炮同不同意

@yuanliu1526

5 жыл бұрын

麻烦你先看下国际上的规定，然后再看下中国声称的版图，你就晓得谁在aggressive了

@raymondzhao9557

5 жыл бұрын

Yuan Liu 我看了，结论是美国

@jkzora5904

5 жыл бұрын

Raymond Zhao 你们说啥就是啥吧，我嘴炮没有你们响，但中国南海属于中国，先问问美国、澳洲、日本、英国、法国的軍艦和电磁炮同不同意。

@banjiu10

5 жыл бұрын

@@jkzora5904 然而他们的军舰并没有电磁炮

@bensontam

5 жыл бұрын

@@jkzora5904 那就開始戰爭吧

Look at very 0ld map in history whole of Indo China was once time belong to China empire in 17th century. see the photo is similar to Chinese custom and culture they wore. It's the proof that so Paracel Island is firm belong to China. Watch this video time from 3:39 to 3:47 for this photo.

You want all international water for mineral and food for Chinese.Pilipino want an school to be a profesional worker for their living.

China seems like the aggressor in thsi story.

It's not south China sea

Phillipines own spratly during the spanish era. You talk of china and vietnam . How does an indian knows about china sea or philllippine sea. Nothing you heard fro vietnam.

The waters are not deep and not that productive.

Free navigation for commercial shipment in the South China Sea passage is a right to navigate before w/ c actually w/o any Law in the UN stating that the South China sea is under the Intenational Laws of the Sea. Since the US is using this sea for war purposses like during the war of Corea and Vietnam, The sea were never been again safe for free shipment navigation and since ite always the target passage of the US Military force navigation, therefore China for security purposes went back to own the South China sea.The US knows about these now the US are already talking a lot of Blasphemy like reserve of oil , gas and other meniral resourcess were the sea lying there for all the century, no any nation talk about the hidden richness of the South China sea, The all other Asian claimant are only using the sea for its abundant fishing not for naval military way to bomb a country that all option lie on the table

A law is a law, therefore UNCLOS is a law!,,each nation must follow!,,,,and China, please obey and keave the SPRATLYS and Paracel island!,,it's not yours!,,

Fake

Your indiaglish speaking is trerrible for god sake don't murder the English language.

@buiquyan3198

6 жыл бұрын

Alex Tseu come on, he just want to explain history

The South China Sea belongs to China and the Chinese, so please do not argue that anymore ! The commentator sounds as if he is a baby speaking a baby language....

@031107437

5 жыл бұрын

Chinese people are very greedy and poisonous. The trend of social development will eliminate such people, like the world of Nazi rejection in the future the Chinese will be replaced by a satisfied nation with the saying (his yard is mine long ago) that is the law of yin and yang