Funny how in most of the of Dr Copeland's videos I am both incredibly fascinated by what he is saying and at the same time thinking: "they are just making this up".

@stargazer7644

5 жыл бұрын

But that's exactly what theoretical physicists DO! They try to explain what we observe in the world by "making up" wild and crazy ideas, and then trying to see if they fit what is observed, and if they successfully predict things we haven't yet observed. Who in their right mind would think that time slows down the faster you move, and that gravity can bend light? But yet when tested, that is exactly what happens.

@thecutestbeansprout1922

4 жыл бұрын

@@stargazer7644 bravo! Wonderfully said

As long as if you don't try to understand it it's not that confusing! :D

@titiavandeneertwegh3170

4 жыл бұрын

😆

It takes a strong willed man to talk for six whole minutes in front of the camera with a creme egg in his hand. I would have scoffed it long before the tape started rolling.

@thrundawolf187

7 жыл бұрын

Same lol

@superstringcheese

7 жыл бұрын

Not if I got to eat it at the end.

@titiavandeneertwegh3170

4 жыл бұрын

😂

eggstra dimension? I'm just shaking my head. lol.

@wickedblackmetal6278

8 жыл бұрын

Dude I'm with you

@thrundawolf187

7 жыл бұрын

Yeah same here

Dam those eggs get smaller every year (or are they just staying the same size in an otherwise expanding universe?)

@Viidakonyka98

7 жыл бұрын

Someone's asking the real questions.

@BaronVonQuiply

7 жыл бұрын

I can't be certain about the universe, but I _have_ noticed a particularly suspicious diminishing in size relative to my waist-line over the years. More research is warranted. Oh, and some milk, too.

@rich1051414

5 жыл бұрын

As a kid, I remember those being the actual size of an egg... something's up...

@illustriouschin

4 жыл бұрын

@@rich1051414 You were smaller then, presumably.

@niks660097

Жыл бұрын

capitalism..

so theres three space dimensions, "eggs", y and z

@alexwilliams7836

10 жыл бұрын

...get out....

@timewalker6654

5 жыл бұрын

Huha

@justincronkright5025

4 жыл бұрын

It would be 'there are' not 'there is' since it's plural. But 'Eggs'terminate the cosmological constant by seeping its power out into a 10 micron Cadbury Cream!

This dudes voice can compete with Morgan F and Liam N

@Kryptic712

8 жыл бұрын

+david bell and stephen H

@rocket6173

8 жыл бұрын

Blake Place lol

@zoe_ward

7 жыл бұрын

*Dude*'s name is Pro. Edmund Copeland; have some respect, bro! :)

@superstringcheese

7 жыл бұрын

I think his voice is almost identical to Brian Cox's. It's very pleasant.

@FriedEgg101

7 жыл бұрын

+superstringcheese Brian Cox is from Manchester, this guy is from somewhere in Yorkshire, which is not far from Manchester.

I could listen to Ed Copeland for hours and hours. He's got a such a relaxing and soothing voice.

The last minute or so really clarified this presentation for me, because I was trying to figure out what those 5th and 6th dimensions were doing.

I prefer my eggstra dimensions with a caramel center.

Sixty symbols is easily my most favorite KZread channel. Everything they put out is extremely informative and fascinating. I love it

I can't believe I found this channel only a couple of days ago. Better late than never, I guess. Absolutely love it!!! Thank you for sharing with the world.

"Why wouldn't you be able to measure this seeping gravity which is escaping out into the eggs?" Hilarious, and surreal.

So 0 dimensions = point, 1 dimension = line, 2 dimensions = plane, 3 dimensions = brane, 4 dimesions = ? ...... Or am I getting the wrong idea here?

@sixtysymbols - brain exploded, thank you! This video is probably one of the best, highly appreciated that you take the time to share!

@BonoboUK thanks for that... glad you're enjoying them! we have a few other channels, like periodicvideos and BackstageScience, etc

I'm curious enough as to inquire whether we should consider consciousness as its own dimension; the flotsam and jetsam of thoughts streaming throughout the cosmos.

@zayk6713

5 жыл бұрын

They would be a comforting idea, but where exactly are you coming from.

Can one say that the gravitational force is traveling a further distance than other forces, because it has to travel through these extra dimensions?

@VoidHugger

8 жыл бұрын

+cimmik That sounds like a pretty cool way of explaining it, yeah

@pj4717

8 жыл бұрын

+cimmik That's precisely what string theory tries to do.

@EebstertheGreat

8 жыл бұрын

+cimmik More or less. When forces like gravity propagate in three spatial dimensions, the potential energy falls off as the square of the distance, because you can imagine the gravitons (or field lines) spreading out on the surface of an expanding sphere, and the surface area of a 2-sphere is proportional to the square of distance. That's where the "inverse square law" for gravity and electricity come from. The idea here is that over scales shorter than the extra dimensions (a few microns), gravity would propagate out into all five spacial dimensions, and thus fall off as the fourth power of distance (the surface of a 4-sphere is proportional to the fourth power of the radius). So although gravity might be of comparable strength to other forces, by the time it has gone a few microns out, its intensity has dropped off enormously. On larger scales, it can still only propagate into the three large spatial dimensions, giving us the apparent inverse square law we observe, but with an apparently very weak gravitational constant. Note that for this explanation to work, the extra dimensions have to be very large (in some models, as large as a millimeter). More recent gravitational experiments have continued to push the upper bound for large extra dimensions down, so that now we have verified to fair confidence (>95%) that gravity obeys the inverse square law down to a scale of ca. 50 microns, which does rule out some but not all models. Tests continue to be conducted as scientists replicate past results and attempt to improve precision for future results.

@helenparker3540

7 жыл бұрын

I thought gravity does not have comparable strength to other forces..? Isn't it the weakest of the forces to a power of 24.

@hopekingscott5291

6 жыл бұрын

think so

Wow, I wished you'd been my Physics teacher. That was a great explanation. The difference it makes to have a good teacher who has the ability to explain things in a clear, easy to understand way..

This is why I love string theory. It's so beautiful yet extremely mysterious and incomprehensible.

I find it "easier" to grasp through additive perpendiculars. A dimension perpendicular to the continuum we can still grasp. But six, I'll ask a dolphin.

@noddwyd

10 жыл бұрын

I always think of it as a fractal of 3d grids, not because that's correct, just because that's easier, haha.

@mikecimerian6913

10 жыл бұрын

noddwyd I'll use anything :-) but topology and it's curiosities like the Klein bottle makes it easier. The same with the Moëbius strip. They are flawed models, finding their flaws was more fun and challenging than discovering them. I agree that fractal and recursion makes it easier to grasp. Dolphins would do better. They hold the lead with their Doppler sonar modes of visual cortex representation. I'm just a babe. :-)

If gravity is such a weak force, and it hurts so much if you just fall to the ground from standing up, the strong forces must be really huge! And violent!

@MrGOTAMA420

9 жыл бұрын

the inverse square law works both ways the closer you get to an object with mass the greater the attraction.

@davecrupel2817

6 жыл бұрын

Hugo Santos magnetism

@MrTomyCJ

5 жыл бұрын

Imagine you are made of metal and the earth is a giant magnet. That force would be insanely stronger than gravity.

I absolutely love listening to this man talk, and especially about the things he talks about!

Every day I get home from working at a nightclub and look forward tos lapping on another one of these videos.... I don't know whether to thank you for completely re-engaging with physics (dropped after A-Level), or to hate you for ramming home to me how much I regret not doing it at degree level and further... Although given these are easily the most watchable, informative science videos I've seen featuring very likeable people it's definitely a thanks!

Ed's the best more Ed please Brady

I'm confused as to how a dimension can have size. Doesn't dimension simply describe possible directions of movement?

@p_serdiuk

7 жыл бұрын

If these dimensions loop upon themselves, you can measure the loop's length and circumference.

@davecrupel2817

6 жыл бұрын

Dirk Djently ehh....in a way, yes.....

@Ni999

5 жыл бұрын

Possible directions of movement are called degrees of freedom. Dimensions always have units, anything with units is a dimension. Not all dimensions are spacetime dimensions.

@ffggddss

5 жыл бұрын

@@Ni999 Yes, the term 'dimension' has dual meanings. But here, we *are* in fact talking about 2 extra spatial dimensions. They are very highly curved, just as in ordinary GenRel the 4 spacetime dimensions are curved near large masses. But unlike that, these 2 extra dimensions' curvature isn't caused by the presence of mass. Fred

@Ni999

5 жыл бұрын

ffggddss I get it. Ed was clear that the discussion is about using a six-dimensional chiral supergravity model to look at an approach to lamba. CERN has papers available on chiral supergravity in d=6 going back over 20 years. Dirk's question was how a dimension can have size, and I wondered if others didn't have the same confusion so I did my best to address that starting point. It's a fair point that I probably didn't do very well.

I just love his explanations! Clearly. He,s taught a lot of undergrads.

FINALLY something leading to an understanding of extra dimensions So pumped for more info

I REALLY like how this guy explains stuff in all the vids :D Anyways, I have a question... How are we supposed to understand how to correctly imagine these extra dimensions when the extra dimension are exemplified by using a 3D object (like an egg or a complex and strange looking computer generated model)? It's like explaining 3D/4D to Mario or Pacman using 2D pixels that are square... "This will make your brain hurt" is the understatement of the century :\

@davecrupel2817

6 жыл бұрын

We, as 3rd dimensional beings, are by design incapable of truely comprehending or properly visualizing what any number of dimensions above 3 looks like. Noone is capable of explaining it. No mathematics or physics is adequate for it to sucessfuly translate. Unless quantum physics opens up a can of worms we havent seen yet, we are forever bound to 3 dimensions. Sorry. :/

@stargazer7644

5 жыл бұрын

These things are best described and understood mathematically, not physically. 5 and 6 dimensions are no problem at all in math.

I'm off to write a computer simulation of all this, because thats how I roll!

@abyss6665

7 жыл бұрын

Hey I wonder... have you finished after 3 years :D?

@salottin

7 жыл бұрын

Did you do it?

@vinaygr28

7 жыл бұрын

did you?

@marcopolo3001

7 жыл бұрын

I did guys and it was a thing of sheer unrivaled beauty!

@salottin

7 жыл бұрын

Did you upload it?

@m00niee glad you liked it!

I remember back to my college days and struggling with Physics. More accurately the professor and his tendency to use math outside the requirements for the class to explain concepts. I barely graded out of the class with a C. Now I work with computers, and while I love it - I sometimes think back to those days and wish I had access to such a wonderful professor being able to explain things in pictures with the mathematical foundation as well. His students are very lucky. Thanks for the vid.

@ Bryon Bridges The eggstra dimensions hurt your brane? Hihihi!

you should have said eggsperiment

Interesting, these dimension videos, and the physics therein is truly amazing.

I would really like to take a course from Prof. Copeland. What a great teacher!

I have the answer ... Gravity is so weak when compared to the other forces, as it gets caught up in all that creamy goodness!

@omegasrevenge

8 жыл бұрын

No wonder after eating all those sweets I have now a gravity around me so strong all my stuff is flying around me in an orbit.

Egg Copeland is so punny! Haha!

almost 2 years ago today this video blew my mind, thx for releasing this on 4/20, lol

I look forward to your videos while enjoying breakfast. While the coffee was fine this morning, the eggs left me with a guilty feeling. I’m sure I’ll be eating cheerios tomorrow. You guys still get a thumbs up from me.

Could this be what dark matter is? If light can't cross dimensions but gravity can. This could be where the extra mass in the universe is hiding, it can be in plain sight but we can only see it through its gravitational effects.

@andrewthecelt3794

8 жыл бұрын

Ash De Vos that was my fist question when I heard of the implied extra dimensions of M theory, is it possible and if so what could it be? Just energy or empty dimensions wouldn't impart mass (or could it through a Higgs field somehow?) or would it have to be particles of some sort?

@rich1051414

8 жыл бұрын

Andrew the Celt There is nothing that would make such a thing impossible, and thus, having gravity that leaks out into our universe is not out of the question either.

@andrewthecelt3794

8 жыл бұрын

Richard Smith Yes but what would it be that imparts the additional mass to the universe? Gravity and space are massless, gravity is a force with heretofore hypothetical spin-2 boson and space, simply a matrix, for all we know, an empty framework. Are you suggesting that any implied Calabi-yau extradimensional manifolds would themselves impart mass to the universe?

@pelegshilo6358

8 жыл бұрын

+Ash De Vos No. The extra dimensions are too small to do that. Actually i'm not sure how to explain that but i've recently read a book that covered this subject and i'm sure it would have mentioned this if it could be true

@chaser4980

8 жыл бұрын

Think of gravity like aerogel on a large scale, like an empty matrix of invisible forces that is then filled in by the other dimensions? I'm not a physicist, and I'm too young to even take physics but does that make any sense?

i had the 6th dimension for breakfast with soldiers.

@tigerwa

9 жыл бұрын

I had soldiers for breakfast with 6 dimensions.

Could the recent discovering/confirmation of gravitational waves at LIGO have anything to say about these extra dimensions?

I'm 15 and I have been watching you for a long time and my Science grades have improved a lot amd my tutor says that I have a boost in my levels because of your video's and he says I have an advantage over my class mates basicly THANK YOU ALOT

how can we estimate the size of the egg ? since it"s an extra dimention, the mesure should be different ... we don't mesure time with meters ... does it mean that those dimentions are incuded in our 4 dimentions ?

@nexusAa

9 жыл бұрын

The general theory of relativity commonly uses normalized coordinate system, where time is in the form of "c*t", so yes, you could say, that time is measured in metres.. Fun fact: The velocity there (called four-velocity) is actually dimensionless.

@therealjordiano

9 жыл бұрын

Nexus no its not dimensionless, it also has units of velocity

@coopergates9680

9 жыл бұрын

therealjordiano Velocity = displacement / change in time, so it sounds like that is redefined.

@therealjordiano

9 жыл бұрын

I don't understand what you're saying cooper

@coopergates9680

9 жыл бұрын

therealjordiano I was telling you what the units of velocity are. Displacement is a change in position. A spatial dimension is simply a direction and its opposite direction, time isn't involved.

How can a dimension have a scale?

@lemmysverruca

7 жыл бұрын

It is curved. If you go along the dimension for a certain distance, you arrive at the point where you started.

@dynamicgecko1213

7 жыл бұрын

lemmysfibroma Hmmmmm..... It's a bit tough to comprehend

@lemmysverruca

7 жыл бұрын

I think it's not so much about understanding but about accepting that things can behave differently to what we think how things are from our own experience. We think about spatial dimensions as something that extends infinitely, the more we move along a path, the further we get away. Here it isn't like that. Just try to forget what you think you know about dimensions for a moment.

@PickyMcCritical

7 жыл бұрын

Well if the universe is often referred to as point on the surface of an expanding balloon, aren't our regular spatial dimensions scaled as well? Wouldn't (somehow) outpacing the expansion of the universe cause the traveler to eventually return to their starting point?

@happmacdonald

7 жыл бұрын

+Melih Durmaz Imagine the dimensions of "Latitude" and "Longitude" along the "space" of the surface of the Earth. If you measure them in "degrees", then they are limited to -90 90 for the lat and -180 180 for long. But "degree" is just the circumference around that angle divided by 360, so we could also choose to measure lat/long in linear units. We'd get -20 20 megameters (Mm) lat and -40 40 Mm long, and our units would be very close to round numbers due primarily to ancient standards for the meter being based on the size of the Earth to begin with. This is similar to Prof Copeland describing the two additional dimensions as egg-shaped, Ro and Theta can only get so far before the measurements return to where they started from. If you are having trouble imagining combining limited dimensions (positively curved) with limitless (flat or negatively curved) dimensions, then let's imagine a 2d model with one limited (positively curved) spatial dimension paired with another unlimited (flat) spatial dimension: namely an infinitely long cylinder. Your coordinate telling how far along the cylinder is unlimited, it can be any value and no matter how far you travel you will find new, fresh cylinder out there. But your "around" coordinate is limited to -180 180 degrees (or if your pipe is 360mm around lets say, then -180 180 millimeters) and trying to use any larger numbers would simply be redundant and describe points you had already assigned unique coordinates for. Of course another way to limit a dimension is the direct route. If I have an 8.5 x 11" sheet of paper, it can be 2d and flat but the dimensions along each axis are limited to how much paper you have. Travel too far and you reach the "edge of space" and are coerced into either an abrupt halt, or a fall outside of the bounds of the originally prescribed test space. Put another way, I can mark 7" along the X axis from one corner of my paper, and the mark stays on my paper 7 inches distant from origin. But if I try to make a mark 20" along the x axis I'll have vandalized my cat who will walk away sulking and the mark refuses to remain at the coordinate we have assigned it: such a coordinate simply isn't valid in our naturally bounded space.

I love both of you guys.

It is really nice to see how his face shines like a little kid with a new toy or you know that kind of pure happines that kids have, when he talks about physics. Amazing.

I would like to eat that Cadbury egg

Did not understand a single thing.

@Nighthunter006

10 жыл бұрын

I think eggs are stealing our gravity...

@MrHugosantos1982

10 жыл бұрын

Don't worry, it's very hard to understand. Well, maybe not hard, it's just that we can only picture things in our minds in 3 dimensions. They say time is a fourth dimension, I can't even imagine that, because that is an extra dimension to the three we live in (up/down, side to side and back to front). The only time I did manage to imagine extra dimensions was with hallucinogenic drugs, but that was a very stupid thing to do, because all that extra power you get in the brain reverses to a proportionial lack of power afterwards...

@grainfrizz

10 жыл бұрын

I feel you, man.

@tylermclellan4954

10 жыл бұрын

Someone wiser then me once said that math and physics isn't what is objectively true it is what has yet to be proven wrong. Basically they created this theory as more or less a guess to account for phenomena (the cosmological constant) that could not be accounted for with what theories they had. If the theory fits the system it is trying to explain to a reasonable extent it is assumed to be more or less true since it is useful. If the theory can be out right rejected or if their is a theory that provides better predictive powers (ie classical vs quantum physics) then the new theory is presumed to replace the old. You make an educated guess see if it can be proven wrong and see if it provides you with reliable and precise predictions. If it passes this test you have a good hypothesis and you can do cool steuff with it. The value of a theory is not its absolute veracity (there is no such thing) but on the new/better predictive abilities it gives you. Those predictive abilities we achieve through the scientific method allow us to manipulate the world around us not absolutely but to an extent that makes life much much much much better. The theory he is discussing was made to fit within the frame work of other math and physical models and to provide us with an explanation for something those models can not explain. It is conceptually unique and not something one can understand by synthesis of known concepts. It is an extrapolation. A thought experiment. Daniel Astillero

@MrHugosantos1982

10 жыл бұрын

My brain is tired, exausted of trying to understand all this crap. I give the fuck up. That's too much for me. I rather remain ignorant than be always mindfucked. Fuck science, fuck nerds, fuck geeks, fuck all that crap, I'm slammin' the door for good. Good the fuck bye! No offense guys, you keep up trying to figure out this stuff. I'm gonna go back to my guitar and play some fuckin heavy metal and fuck my girlfriend.

2: Traditionally we have labelled points in space-time using 4 different parameters (1 for each dimension), being [x,y,z,time], corresponding to [length, width, height, time], but this video proposes that for every location, or point to have its own unique label, there must be 6 parameters or dimensions, namely [x,y,z,time,rho,theta]. Hope that clears some stuff up :)

Now that gravitational waves have been measured, can we get an update on this video?

I... understood... nothing.

@vitorix24

7 жыл бұрын

If the universe was just 3 dimensions+time the cosmology constant would be 0 so the universe wouldn't be expanding. But it is so the constant must be greater than 0. How? There's a leak of gravity from this dimension into the other two extra dimensions. That's why cosmology constant is not 0 and that's why universe is expanding and accelerating.

@iihamed711

4 жыл бұрын

@@vitorix24 still don't understand 😢

@aumshreeshah2322

4 жыл бұрын

You take 3 years to reply..

NOT A REAL BRIT HE SAID SOCCER BALL NOT A FOOTBALL! FAEK!!!!!!!!

@MrGOTAMA420

9 жыл бұрын

like we need more REAL brits

@RomulessI

9 жыл бұрын

Or maybe he's smart enough to know these videos are being seen by tons of Americans, so specified accordingly. Just a mayyyyybe..

@Daniel.Liddicoat

9 жыл бұрын

Maybe he follows rugby

@TheThreatenedSwan

9 жыл бұрын

RomulessI Accurate

@RonJohn63

9 жыл бұрын

'Cause he knows that Brits are as worthless as Canadians. MURICA!!!!!!

Any follow up to this? I'd love to hear more on this

I think that these videos can accomplish more than years of teaching ever could.

this stuff keeps me up at night

@ADizezedCrow i think it's possible becouse if gravity can "leak out" so it can "leak in" too. i was wondering about the implication of that on neutrinos speed , can just neutrinos sometimes "jump" some space but actually move slower than c ?

Very nice phenomenological explanation by analogy. A potential mechanism might be information-sharing among multiverses; consistent with particle formation in a vacuum and the necessary relative expansion of this universe.

@BlueCosmology That break point between classical physics where motion is differentiable in all places and particle physics where only some are is what I was /facedesking about.

When you speak of this egg are you speaking of multidimensional matter or the six dimensional range of the possible function coinciding with said point (in row and theta)

Really amazing stuff!

1: A point in space is any location in space-time. These extra dimensions mentioned come into play in the description of a point in space. Every point must have its own unique way of being labelled, otherwise you could have two locations occupying the exact same space (think of earth and mars existing in the same location... it just cannot happen).

Are there any models where there can be more than one time dimension?

@Zeldakitteh The 4th dimension is usually time, because it is the one we can observe, but not interact with or have any influence over. To find the 5th, 6th, and so on, we would first need to exist in the 4th, 5th and so on.

Does the Cosmological Constant have a unit of measurement? Is it the same as the Entropy of the universe (the number of ways that particles of the universe can be combined?)?

That was very interesting. A strangely clear/ easy to understand...

so if we had the ability to travel in hyperspace, would light seep to those extra dimensions? also by these dimensions its also base on the metric tensor unification like kalutza etc? and whats outside of these hyperdimensions, what makes them bounded or why cant they just scatter, and do they act like foam or quantum foam? are they made of particles smaller than planck length or etc on this field brane?

I've never been so lost for so long while watching a video from youtube.

This professor is great. You can tell he is really trying to come across so most of us can understand.

@BlueCosmology The fact that you said it takes more time for light to travel through a specific medium for a given distance inherently means that you can change the speed of light. You can't speed it up as far as we know past 3e8, but you can most certainly slow it down by passing it through various mediums.

Could you explain how rho and theta ( the obloid ) cancel out omega ? Is the ‘egg’ model also part of the theory of SUSY? How is the electroweak force confined to 4d ( is it a quantum egg? ). Could you show how to recalculate omega? Thanks

I have to rewatch it a few times to get it.

@dudejohnny Thank you for your reply, but no, I am not sure I understand how to measure acceleration. I understand the measurement of speed by red-shift, but not acceleration. Acceleration is the rate of change, or first derivative, of speed. That would imply to me that we have observed an object for a long enough period of time and calculated the rate of change of that speed. Is that how is it done? Again, thank you for the dialogue.

@1PintLasher Technically the speed isn't changing when it enters a medium, it's just bouncing around and taking a longer path through the medium.

@dudejohnny I am sorry that I was unclear as to the anteceedent of 'it'. I was referring to the speed of the galaxy, not the speed of light.

This professor's voice is just honey for my ears.

And what is expected density of those eggs? Hom many eggs are (supposed to be) in a cubic meter times second?

what if you could see the dividing line (the event horizon) of a black hole and normal space at the planck length. would it look the same?

when you described the two additional dimensions you mentioned chirality, but didn't elaborate on that. I assume that was the dimension dealing with going around the egg. Could you please elaborate more on chirality. I'm aware that not only people, but molecules, electrons, and, of course, planets and galaxies rotate or orbit about an axis in a clockwise or counter clockwise manner, but I suspect there is deeper stuff here.

I completed calculus I II III and DE through self-study. Is there anything more I need to start learning QM and string-theory? Linear algebra? Number theory? Or am I ready?

Just wondering : as the cosmos expands, does it mean that even the size of atoms, or the space separating particles within it, is also affected ?

Watching these videos is a great motivation for me to study and then hopefully get my degree in physics :3.

@Shitor603

Жыл бұрын

Hope you did

@1PintLasher Almost, it doesn't absorb more of light's energy it just holds on to it for longer. Cold systems are more stable and an electron in a high energy level in a cold atom is more stable and less likely to "de-excite" (go to a lower energy level) then an electron in a high energy level in a warm atom. The light is re-emitted when the electron de-excites and as such the longer it takes to de-excite, the slower the light appears to go.

@lolimso18 lol - no. the interviewer, and maker of all these excellent vids, is Brady, who is an Australian living in the UK. The three concords are kiwi's (nz'ers). Sounds very similiar though, esp if yr not used to any of those accents :)

@aehirsty I understood a percentage equal to the mid 90s value of the cosmological constant.

so is my position on the egg constant or does it change as i change my time/x/y/z position?

@stargazer7644

5 жыл бұрын

The egg is forever forbidden to you. You are forced to live your life on the brane.

What does it even mean for the egg dimensions to have a size or scale? Conversely, what are the sizes of the first 3 spatial dimensions?

So just to clarify 3:00, is Ro just a combination of X and Y, whilst Theta is a combination of X and Z or am I missing something (or missing quite a lot?)? Also, I don't know why they have that disclaimer at the beginning, most of this stuff gives me a headache anyway.

Could the seep in gravity into the extra dimensions be at the center/singularity of a black hole? Normally gravity is very weak however at a black hole it is a stronger force.

So what he means is that this egg-model provides a way to cope with the fine tuning problem of the cosmological constant? Btw, "eggstra dimensions", haha this was so brilliant & cute!

Would the discovery of Gravitons prove this theory as like in a particle smasher. fining a graviton leaving the dimension or the brane that we are on?

So if you can predict the size of the eggs . . . What is the spacial distance between each dimensional egg? How often do they occur?

If gravity can go into this eggstra dimension, would black holes be holding the dimensions together or bridging them or doing something?

Could the extra dimensions of String Theory represent potential future possibilities and opportunities in our 3D Universe of continuous creation? Based on: 1. The quantum w-particle function Ψ or probability function represents the forward passage of time itself with the future coming into existence photon by photon. 2. Quantum uncertainty ∆×∆p×≥h/4π is the same uncertainty we have with any future event within our own ref-frame that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual

you can think of it like the aura it mesure in microns and has force, and fog colors always changing

What does the "size" of a dimension mean? is it the smallest possible distance in that dimension?

Are you familiar with Dr. Ravitz's work of electro-metric measurements on psy-chi-atric problems?

can we have an update on this? ;)

@Tmaker197812 I'd say that's equally misleading, as HCl(acid) doesn't require (aqua). For example, you can use it within methanol to protonate an acid-catalyst in an anhydrous environment. (note to self, extend spell check dictionaries to include chemistry terminology)