Saying that China has the biggest Navy is like saying Lego is the largest rubber tire producer. Technically true, but completely mischaracterizing the reality of the situation.

@xander2890

2 жыл бұрын

Even China themselves call their Navy production is like "dumplings dumping" --- fast like dumping dozens of dumplings into the (boiling) water.

@hughjass1044

2 жыл бұрын

He did explain that they were still far behind the US despite their numbers.

@sinoroman

2 жыл бұрын

if the quality of both navies aren't too far apart, quantity is where it matters

@smileyface2915

2 жыл бұрын

yep most are just coastal patrol vessels even Japan's Navy isn't too concern about it, if it were Destroyers that are the majority ships now it's a problem.

@Wilhelmofdeseret

2 жыл бұрын

@@sinoroman except the quality between the two is drastic

The total defense expenditure in USD between nations without accounting for labor, energy, compliance and other costs or exchange rates is a meaningless metric. Obviously the cost of producing and sustaining weapons systems and paying service members are much lower in China than they are in the US. Why would you use spending in USD as a basis for defense capability comparison?

@innosam123

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese weapons and infantry quality is also generally viewed as inferior, however. This is part of the reason eg. nominal prices for GDP are preferred over PPP. PPP tends to overestimate the abilities of poorer nations.

@erikrungemadsen2081

2 жыл бұрын

The US policy is they have to be capable of taking on the next 3 biggest militaries in the world at the same time. So the answer must be no.

@toddbrackett4277

2 жыл бұрын

@@innosam123 your understanding of economics is obviously a bit more advanced than mine is but you got me to go learn about PPP. I would be interested to see a comparison of defense spending between the US and China in PPP.

@user-us4hl3zr2b

2 жыл бұрын

i think China is still not on par with usa

@yashsiriah21

2 жыл бұрын

Even if adjusted for purchasing power parity, US spending is still far too high

The amount of the budget is less important than how the most is spent!

@Meinan4370

2 жыл бұрын

China spends half of it for internal security so already kinda bad

@lvl5969

2 жыл бұрын

You're definitely right... is a big part of the American budget going to the maintenance of all those overseas bases ?

@regularhuman95

2 жыл бұрын

USA gets alot less for paying a lot more actually. Everything is expensive in US. USA military budget looks good on papers but doesnt really means other countries are spending any less.

@Kevwadius

2 жыл бұрын

True. Also need to factor in the cost of Labor and materials in each country is vastly different. Eg, 1 billion USD goes a lot further in China than it does in the USA.

@davout5775

2 жыл бұрын

@@regularhuman95 It actually means just that.

Why was this video longer than “no”

@3Chandresh3

2 жыл бұрын

That would have been a great video

@xander2890

2 жыл бұрын

Because he wanted to say 'Hell no'.

There is so much on the China situation in the media; and rightly so. China and the South China sea is a focal point for much fr a substantial chunk of world trade. China in 2021 is light years away from where it was in the 70's. 500 million Chinese folk now out of poverty; their government must have done something right. I still think it is a paradox that the Communist Party has embraced the free market and capitalism to fuel their growth ambitions. An emerging power will have a growing military in order to protect its sovereignty and interests. I do not believe that China wants to invade and occupy other country's - apart from Taiwan that is. Yes they may have ambitions to control countries where these further their interests. In this day and age there is no need to occupy a country in order to control it.

@user-bu3wp3up9f

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, unfortunately the current government in Taiwan has been trying to anger China. In the past, China has been trying to promote the peaceful reunification of Taiwan, including educating Chinese young people to love Taiwanese. But now most Chinese people believe that peaceful reunification is hopeless and that reunification by force is the only way. In fact, Beijing has been suppressing such public opinion and public anger, but the Taiwanese government has become increasingly provocative, including language and actions. In addition, border disputes with India may also trigger wars. On the surface, India hopes to use the McMahon Line left over from the British colonial period as its national border, but in fact many northern areas of the McMahon Line have been eroded by India. The war in 1962 did not make them abandon the "Advance Policy." In recent conflicts, Indians crossed the line of actual control and entered China's control. The background in photos and videos is evidence. China has no intention of invading India. China's territory is large enough and its population is large enough. We have been solving the poverty problem for decades. If we occupy India, we need to help them solve more poverty problems, economic problems, especially health problems. I dare not shake hands with them, and I don’t want to eat their food and water. The first problem for any country to occupy India is to build toilets. China is not so generous.

@iuok6679

2 жыл бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍

@_Wai_Wai_

2 жыл бұрын

The PRC, when it emerged as a Unified Country (from decade of division) in 1949, the USA again threatened China with a War in Korea. USA threatened to Nuke China at the time. Then again, during Taiwan straits Crisis of 1957, USA threatened to Nuke China. For over a hundred years (from early 1800's to mid 1900's) the West has divided, and humiliated China. Invasion of China and burning/looting of Chinese cities, Extraterritoriality, Opium Wars, Bombardment coastal Cities. It is time for China to take back what is rightfully Chinese.

@JoeySav

2 жыл бұрын

China didn't get out of poverty until it went into the WTO and opened their specific economic zones, when they let people come in and invest and gave the chinese people the ability to make money on their own only did they do well. Now they are trying to become more closed off and will only doom them going forward. No nation survives on their own, never have and never will.

@JoeySav

2 жыл бұрын

that isn't the issue, they are trying to claim things that were either lost almost 100 years ago or longer than that. They are trying to make manmade military islands so they can chokepoint points of the south China sea which goes against everything we've had that gave the massive amount of global prosperity we have now.

I don't know what you did with the saturation or the temperature of the video but; gat dayum. You made his teeth even more yellow; they're neon. wtf VP-en editor?

@armunro

2 жыл бұрын

I thought Grant had gold teeth :)

@Minchya

2 жыл бұрын

@@armunro English teeth !

@sasorishino

2 жыл бұрын

I thought he drank some sort of yellow herbal tea 🤔

@lev1673

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂 probbly he never brushes his teeth

@MusicalMemeology

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah way too warm.

US spent almost two trillion dollars in Afghanistan and that's part of their military budget.

@Dweller415

2 жыл бұрын

and as part of that $2 trillion, the Taliban have never been better armed. 😂😂😂

@sourballs1248

2 жыл бұрын

@MASARU Hamamoto WW1? WW2? 😂😂😂😂😂😂

@bighands69

2 жыл бұрын

@MASARU Hamamoto Afghanistan was not a war for the US it was a minor battle that was won by its special forces. Are you implying leaving the country was losing a war?

@sourballs1248

2 жыл бұрын

@@bighands69 he supports the CCP so obviously he’s desperate for whatever lies he can make himself believe

@sourballs1248

2 жыл бұрын

@لو لم اكن انا لوددت ان اكون ابو نواس are you saying that the US were not on the winning side of WW2???

The string of pearls is a nice way of saying 80% of their energy is imported and passes through the malacca strait and/or hormuz, not to mention other critical imports so they don’t starve and freeze. It’s a liability, not an asset. The US has two long coastlines and friendly neighbors.

@sinoroman

2 жыл бұрын

>friendly neighbors one is a junior, and another is struggling to stay alive. lol

@LuisRomeroLopez

2 жыл бұрын

@@sinoroman Still less vulnerable to blockades.

@LuisRomeroLopez

2 жыл бұрын

@Wak Gaban A legit concenr would be how stable are Pakistan and Myanmar. If I'm right, the progress in Gwadar didn't went as expected due all kind of problems (corruption, inestability, pakistani population becoming more suspicious of chinese presence, Baluche movement, etc.)

@sammysedore

2 жыл бұрын

China's already controls near half of Mongolia and has expanded their sea borders they aren't worried

@sammysedore

2 жыл бұрын

@@LuisRomeroLopez Pakistan is a solid 20 30 years away from being relevant economically China's is gonna own their government with bribes

It's important to remember that there are two ways a country can militarily overcome another country. The first would be to invest enough to reach the opponent. The second is when the opponent spends more than it can afford and implodes financially like the Soviet Union.

@nehcooahnait7827

2 жыл бұрын

Unless the one that spends significantly more ditches ‘unnecessary fiscal liabilities’ like universal healthcare or affordable public education…

@marioceva7163

2 жыл бұрын

USA spend 10 times more in in- security than Russia

@jordancarpenter4093

2 жыл бұрын

@@marioceva7163 China already has better weapons and high- technology than us USA according to the Pentagon!

@marioceva7163

2 жыл бұрын

@@jordancarpenter4093 China has superiority in tech weapons over USA im some areas but not in all weapon Tech. Russia is more advanced than USA and China. China need 5 year to reach and surpase USA in weapon tech and quantity of weapons. Example. 8n submarines American and Russians are better quality.

@davidhimmelsbach557

2 жыл бұрын

@@jordancarpenter4093 Watch out. The Pentagon ALWAYS told the world that the USSR was a dire threat and therefore the Pentagon needed yet a BIGGER budget. You'll never find any Pentagon assessment that reads any other way. Get used to it. The deal with hypersonic weapons is that they make virtually zero sense to the Pentagon, the Beltway or Congress. That's why the US let the Russians and the Red Chinese spend large while ignoring this new techno-gambit. Never forget that hypersonic warheads shrink payload and range. This is a direct consequence of flying through the upper-atmosphere instead of the vacuum of space. Of course, all IRMBs and ICBMs are hypersonic, too. Russia and Red China are launching their hypersonic warheads atop plain vanilla ICBMs -- something that the Press keeps omitting.

Never involve in a war when you don't have the confidence to win. Stay peace as long as possible to prevent loss of lives. - Sun Tzu, Art of War (this is real)

When Americans were debating about gender equality China was building Nukes.

@jameshee5075

2 жыл бұрын

Chinese people understand that for the sake of a stable and harmonious society, women must play second fiddle to men and the Chinese women have gladly accepted this.

@franciscoresendiz4295

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshee5075 stable? Chinese has a aging population with few young people and let's not forget the 30m extra woman to men

Do you get how important the size the logistics and supply support is to a military force.

@jacobrance4683

2 жыл бұрын

Tyson fury is the goat

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

Because of logistics the most carriers the US could possibly have in the same place is two...

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

@@trentkenzler8478 They rotate crew every 3 months only half of those are out at sea at the same time..

@wellokthen720

2 жыл бұрын

@@trentkenzler8478 Thats not true unless theyve started growing food in subs now

@ArawnOfAnnwn

2 жыл бұрын

Logistics and supply is on the side of the Chinese, as any war will be in their own backyard.

this is amazing work. love your desk set up and also the background music. it is a very well-researched video. thanks for uploading. from where do you get these videos of different countries?

@user-us4hl3zr2b

2 жыл бұрын

Research and subscribe and... editing

LONG LIVE THE FREE AND INDEPENDENT NATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAIWAN!!!! 🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼

@xander2890

2 жыл бұрын

That flag is Republic of China actually.

@constantineceasar

2 жыл бұрын

@@xander2890 The ROC and ROT are tre the same nation. I just say Republic of Taiwan because it pisses off the wamous more.

@constantineceasar

2 жыл бұрын

@Superior than everyone Thank you you for the advice, but when Putin is out of power and Navalny is president. I plan on going back to Russia and resuming my career in politics. Hopefully I can help push the effort to open these embassies. 😊

@madhab7451

2 жыл бұрын

@@constantineceasar I heard Putin is very popular among the Russian people ?! But him not conducting elections makes him look like a douche

@xander2890

2 жыл бұрын

@@constantineceasar No no, even Taiwan people themselves don't call themselves ROT. It's illegal understand the constitution.

If you account for price difference between the us and china. China is spending the same amount on its military

MOST OF THOSE ARE SPENT ON THE SALARY OF THE SOLDIERS AND MAINTAINING FOREIGN BASES. THE BUDGET CAN BE MISLEADING.

@FonFreeze

2 жыл бұрын

Thats right mate. Some just look at budget.

@Minchya

2 жыл бұрын

@@FonFreeze 40% of China's military budget goes to feeding, housing, clothing, transportation and paying military pensions. A3: Estimates released by external organizations paint a more complete picture of what China actually spends on its military by accounting for expenditure outside the official budget. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) estimated that Chinese defense-related expenditure actually reached $240 billion in 2019-nearly 40 percent higher than the official budget ($183.5 billion). Similarly, the International Institute for Strategic Studies put the 2019 figure at $234 billion. The U.S. Department of Defense has stated that China’s actual spending could be higher than $200 billion.

@Bonanzaking

2 жыл бұрын

@@FonFreeze people also seem to forget inflation being a thing. So any time i see those budgets year on year sometimes it feels like they didn’t exactly increase it but are just keeping up with their inflation.

@johnm7267

2 жыл бұрын

@@Minchya you are a well known troll. Spreading lies and disinformation.

@johnm7267

2 жыл бұрын

@@FonFreeze Dont respond to this Joe Perone he is a well known troll. He will just keep you with never ending lies and misinformation

China's military is Mainly for defense, not only of its homeland, but also of trade routes and ports. But American military is used for Power Project and for maintaining global military bases (Iraq, S Korea, Japan, Italy, Germany, UAE, Ecuador, Phillippines, Australia etc etc.....

*The U.S has deployed in Asia-pacific about 325k troops, 180 ships about 60% of the entire navy.*

@XxDAOGJAYYxX

2 жыл бұрын

In troops number that’s 60% there are many more ships around 500 in total

@changtang428

2 жыл бұрын

即使这样多的军队人数，如果东亚发生战争日本和韩国一定会在第一时间被消灭，DF系列全覆盖。

@umutkarzai9190

2 жыл бұрын

@@changtang428 Write in a language everyone can understand not your Mandarn Gobaldigook!!

@bx9258

2 жыл бұрын

@@umutkarzai9190 that’s why it’s time to learn Chinese if u want to understand

@umutkarzai9190

2 жыл бұрын

@@bx9258 I don't need to understand them they need to understand that they will be starved out, if they try to overcome the U.S. fleet and troops. Our fleet of attack submarines the most advanced in the world nuclear powered approx. 130 in number with 60 from the newer Virginia class can impose a blockade on China simply, by sinking a large number of ships headed into and out of China's ports. They wouldn't even be able to know for sure if, it was our subs doing the dirty work while our ally India blockaded the straits of Malacca cutting off most oil and gas from China!! BX92 I'm 62 years old and I'm not learning Mandarin at my age and certainly I'm not learning the primitive pictograph writing which is way out of date. Even the Koreans have an alphabet, not the old ancient pictograph systems similar to ancient Eygpt's heirogyphics!! The Chinese should be more worried about us , because when push comes to shove the U.S. can certainly not only hold its own, but muscle China out of the way both, economically and militarily!!

Can Simon just come back?

@davidcadman4468

2 жыл бұрын

@fa q agreed. This doofuss is a clown show. Spitting American Propaganda from VOA and CIA... I'm not subbed, just showed up in my referrals.

now this is an eye opener

I get pre-WW2 imperial Japan vibes when there is talk about China’s military and their plans for the region.

@Dom-kk4sl

2 жыл бұрын

It's about time anyways

@Dom-kk4sl

2 жыл бұрын

For a country this large this big this size, the momentum carries it a few thousand years... Study china history n find iut

@theMarhaenist

2 жыл бұрын

The wisdom of chinese people is much deeper than of Japan. You can talk anything but not to alter the story in which China will restore glory. 💐🇨🇳✊!

@xander2890

2 жыл бұрын

@@theMarhaenist Nah, as always happen in China's old empires, the Emperor takes all the glory, and life still sucks AF for the ordinary people.

@sinoroman

2 жыл бұрын

it's not the same nor similar. too many people think every conflict in the world is another ww2. so dumb lol

2:53 no, I definitely slept well for the last three weeks…

China stands alone in this.

@iamaloafofbread8926

2 жыл бұрын

And the ccp will fall at some point

@sinoroman

2 жыл бұрын

gordon chang is a comedian

@MichelleSuiComedy

2 жыл бұрын

@@iamaloafofbread8926 sun will combust too. yeah and we will all be long gone then.

So the US doesn't have similar "MCU" plan? Boeing? NASA? Lockheed Martin? Google? Apple? etc. etc.?

@jascrandom9855

2 жыл бұрын

Isn't that what the Defense Production Act is?

@Sceptis

2 жыл бұрын

Fair point.

@utobesuckslol6687

2 жыл бұрын

@@jascrandom9855 Exactly, why is he acting like it is unique to the commie China?

@jascrandom9855

2 жыл бұрын

@@utobesuckslol6687 I guees the differences coul be in the details. Mainly that US's plan would be a partnership between Government and Private enterprises, while China's plan the goverment takes direct control over everything.

This, as usual doesn’t take a lot of factors into perspective. The Chinese live in a much more dangerous neighborhood and while I don’t think the US should underestimate them the only thing they really can do is become a regional power because they can never commit a significant force overseas which it would require to take on the US. The elephant in the room is that the world from the US perspective is still small and even if you could destroy the US control in the area which is highly unlikely they can still reach it and touch you in a very destructive way. They also have partnerships with S Korea, Japan and India just to make a few which are no slouches either. Even if China managed to form stable alliances with, say Pakistan and Russia which is very unlikely they have world class militaries on their doorstep and Japan has recently began to build up against both China and Russia and they are in a good situation being that they already have 3 aircraft carriers with F-35s and don’t forget about England, France and India who have recently brought their aircraft carriers to the region and I don’t think it’s just symbolic. They have a plan to confront the threat of China and while they make a good show of it they’re in a very desperate situation for sure and with the corruption in their government I would tend to say they are a paper dragon. They remind me so much of Iraq because on paper this all looks good but it is all built on a shaky foundation that’s full of corruption and while the US is in a state of relative division atm we will likely come together in the face of a large threat. Something like sinking an American aircraft carrier would have the opposite affect that is if they can be sunk so they have a lot to make up for whereas the US is really in a much better position to dictate terms

@umutkarzai9190

2 жыл бұрын

What he said!!

Basing military power on weaponry alone is not accurate. There are other factors more important like discipline of the soldiers

Wow very good analysis of the sistuation

He has finally returned!

the problem with a dictatorship give too much power to the military and they can end up overthrowing you

@elalcazar7374

2 жыл бұрын

Fun fact. Did you know. China does not have an army. The CCP has. Every soldier swears loyality to the CCP not China. So you can bet that both are linked in more ways than one. The likelyhood of an insurection is way lower than in any other country.

@ryanangel2361

2 жыл бұрын

Chairman from people and militer from people and this is People republic of china 😂😂🎉

@eduwino151

2 жыл бұрын

@@elalcazar7374 one day an officer somewhere may just decide and kill all the party political leadership and sieze power

@warrenking7965

2 жыл бұрын

@@elalcazar7374 what? No. They just have to remove Xi, not the party. There are other factions in the party. They’ve tried to remove him recently and they won’t stop.

@ED-vm5oy

2 жыл бұрын

There was no cou for the last 90 years in China.

It's not really wise to think that you can win a war just because you have a greater amount of weapons, the quality of equipment, training, history and experience are incomparably important.

@Rotheruler

2 жыл бұрын

Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghan, sigh.. same ideology same outcome, but hush. Let the ignorance continue...

@awesomedata8973

2 жыл бұрын

Gotta say, since China pretty much controls the U.S. infrastructure and its technology-focused weaponry (that is, its roadway logistics and computer-based operation of said 'quality' equipment and weapons), this point is even more important to consider. The Chinese will try to exploit this opening and crush other nations economically. Too bad the American *ego* is "Too big to fail" -- If losing to Afghanistan wasn't the eye-opener America needed to stop underestimating its opponents, _nothing_ is.

@huas5350

2 жыл бұрын

It doesn't take much skill to launch nuclear weapons. Both sides only need to ensure that there are enough satellite weapons, intercontinental missiles and nuclear warheads to cover each other's cities, and increase as many defense systems as possible to reduce nuclear explosions. Talking about equipment and combat experience is not the war thinking of several top dog countries.

@FrostbitexP

2 жыл бұрын

@@huas5350 Limited war is certainly possible. Naval battles could be fought over Taiwan with neither side obviously wanting to send on the nukes and destroy society...Over Taiwan.

@huas5350

2 жыл бұрын

@@FrostbitexP Don't be naive. China is not Iraq, they will not just stand there to defend. Like the United States, China also has a projection strike capability with global coverage. Even without nuclear warheads, intercontinental missiles launched in large quantities from China will cover American cities in 20 minutes. And vice versa. As long as one side officially declares war, it means that it will never be just a local war.

they are foresighted and well strategized...

Many people also forget that maintenance adds to the cost and is quite important.

They need to surpass Vietnamese military first.

@John-us9rm

2 жыл бұрын

What a joke? 🤣

@jaybee4577

2 жыл бұрын

Do you mean both USA and China? Because they both lost wars to Vietnam.

@John-us9rm

2 жыл бұрын

@@jaybee4577 how does chiba lost whrn they plan the withdrawal after their objective to punish the viet is met. They destroyed everything and left. Viet agreed to cede 2 hills to china as war bounty after the war. Is that lost?????

China is already a regional superpower and its influence on Asia has surpassed the U.S. in recent years. However, China's exponential growth do come with some major issues. Since the vid is looking at China external prospects I will not talk about its internal problem for the sake of argument. For starter, China's influence on the region and CCP's foreign policies are not very amicable to say the least. China has managed to force Japan to expand its national army which has been restrained by the Japanese Constitution and public opinion since WW2. The south east nations such as Vietnam and Philippines are also on the edge due to China recent territorial claims in their national waters. The irony of the situation is that Taiwan may benefit from the volatility and hostility within the Indo-Pacific region since the U.S. and surrounding countries may consider to help Taiwan becoming a thorn at China side to curb down the CCP's overbearing approach. After the Hong Kong incident in 2020, the international community has become more sympathetic to Taiwan struggle. And we may even see a massive event in the coming decade which Taiwan can be recognized as a genuine nation or the CCP just straight up invade them under the cause of "reunification". My point is, the CCP's foreign policies has made them the villain of the region and that can be dangerous. And if the coming U.S. administrations can get their heads out of their asses and play politics well, they can create a network of alliances that can hamper the growth of China.

@chinadollfmd

2 жыл бұрын

The first logical comment I read, I so agree with you.

@JWPanimation

2 жыл бұрын

Nice, I think they have with the QUAD + Taiwan

@user-mn5cv1be1f

2 жыл бұрын

Last weekend we caught up with friends of my husband. It’s my first time to meet them. Both of them tried to pick my brain about what happened between mainland China and Taiwan. It’s funny they both used “will China INVADE Taiwan?” Apparently they only got one side story from the media. They have no idea about the civil war happened between CCP and national party before 1949. National party failed and ran to Taiwan. Both parties have never signed ceasefire agreement. If there wasn’t a Korea war, mainland China might take Taiwan back already. The last president of Taiwan was Mr. Ma from National Party who signed 92 agreement with CCP on One China policy. His term became the best relations between two sides. Later the DPP won the election and the current president Ms. Cai broke the agreement and tried to separate Taiwan from China. Even worse DPP once said they consider to allow US to set military base in Taiwan. Most people out of China don’t know Taiwan is not the sovereignty independent country in UN and most countries have diplomatic relations with China agree One China policy. If you are political leader in China, will you allow that happen? The west MSM will never tell you the whole story or maybe they even don’t know the history at all

@seh1080

2 жыл бұрын

@@user-mn5cv1be1f it's true that most of the west do not know the complete story between China and Taiwan -- including myself. However, i know for a fact that the CCP wants to annex Taiwan because of the technological knowledge the West has imparted upon Taiwanese companies. The U.S. has been banning technological exports to Chinese companies and strong arm its allies to do the same. With its tradition of copying and then innovating western technologies, China has become dependent on the West to develop. The West has starting to realize the threats of letting China steal their technologies and taking countermeasures in recent years. This has made Taiwan become more enticing to the CCP with its technological manufactures and deposit of advance knowledge. Even the CCP realizes this dependency hence their efforts of creating a genuine high tech Chinese culture. However corruptions and the habit of poaching foreign talents rather culturing their own have made many of the projects failures. This is why recently Xi has vowed to unify Taiwan back into China.

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

@@seh1080 Even then, taking Táiwān wouldn't necessarily grant the PRC that high value-added human capital the Taiwanese possess in their brains and democratized governance. That durable prosperity comes through societal trust and exploratory dissent, which can't develop under Communism.

Good job 👍

To which band does the music you use in your videos belong?

The thing that I think gives America the edge is innovation and immigration. China is still playing catch up and most of its weapons are partial or complete copies of existing aircraft, ships, weapons, and vehicles. The US innovates new technology that hasn’t been tried yet which is why you see a lot of failed projects and a lot of military concepts never put into production. This means while China is gearing up to match the American forces of today, America is constructing the military forces of tomorrow. As long as America can keep its best ideas out of Chinese ears, it will always have something that can give America the edge in an otherwise equally matched fight and equalize an otherwise lopsided fight. With immigration, the US has two advantages it can leverage against China: manpower and achievement. China has the largest amount of people in the world with a population of 1.4 billion people, which drastically outclasses America’s 332 million by a factor of four. However, America could simply offer American citizenship to anyone who joins the American military along with cashing in their alliances and the US can match the manpower of China. Secondly America can cash in on the gifted individuals from around the world by giving them a path to a better life like it has been doing for decades. Since America has been a melting pot for a long time now and China is very homogeneous, a prospective immigrant would feel much more at home in a culture that already has people from their own country and, in some cases, even their own architecture and food. The most notable example is Elon Musk. He was originally born in South Africa with ambitions to become a business owner and he became the richest man on earth and has made contributions to the American society that is already immeasurable, including to the military sector as reflected by the fact that Starlink was used to successfully connect military platforms to make military communication more difficult to disrupt, that the government commissioned SpaceX to use a rocket like Starship to deliver supplies to anywhere in the world within 1 hour, and that numerous American military satellites have been launched by SpaceX. Because of these reasons, I believe America will have the edge over China for the foreseeable future. The video was right in that the era of the US easily defeating China is coming to close if not already done. However, with the right will and military prowess, the US should win all things equal.

@mrlove7097

2 жыл бұрын

That's never going to happen white American men too busy being racist against all of The nowhite Americans just saying 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️😂😂

@samthesuspect

2 жыл бұрын

@@mrlove7097 that's why all the county's surrounding china (Japan, Vietnam, India, South Korea) prefer the US to China lol, and if you think the US is racist just look Chinese detergent commercial. China is much more racist than the US lol.

@uk6728

2 жыл бұрын

us is always ahead

@slslbbn4096

2 жыл бұрын

Any amateur can already tell the US has an inability to handle biological weapons attack. These are cheap and easily spreadable between American cities. I wonder if insurgents and islamists are already making purchases of these weapons for release in America. Cause that would be the most cost effective and easy thing to do.

@Rex-ww4cw

2 жыл бұрын

@@samthesuspect you can say the same to US. Most of the South America country doesn't like the US either. Same for India, Japan, South Korea ext. Pakistan, Blangadesh, China, Sri Lanka doesn't like India Japan, China, North Korea doesn't like South Korea. South Korea, China, North Korea doesn't like Japan.

China includes fishing boats with a machine gun as naval vessels. The US Navy is the greatest most powerful naval force on the planet

@oguun_garvey6531

2 жыл бұрын

If some of their adversaries are in Southeast Asia that aren't the US. Those could still be of use to them

@papabear90

2 жыл бұрын

They also said that about the US army. And it hasn't won a war for decades, in fact it regularly gets its ass handed to it.

@jeffreyexposito3803

2 жыл бұрын

@@papabear90 in a purely conventional war the US military would annihilate any country including Russia and China. No country matches the US militarys ability to bring as much firepower on the battlefield in as little time as possible and just as importantly the logistical capacity to move troops and material anywhere in the world.

@nadirkhan7353

2 жыл бұрын

@@jeffreyexposito3803 boring bullshit...no one fights conventional wars anymore....harping on and on about the USA is this and that like a dumb parrot...get with the times....things evolve ...power changes hands

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

North Korea has the most powerful naval force on the planet and they are allies ... You have to beat them too....

Military budget while a useful metric isn’t fully indicative of how that manifests in capability

You guys just made a vid saying it couldn’t

@3Chandresh3

2 жыл бұрын

Lol true 😂

@thevaxvangaurd9197

2 жыл бұрын

I like this guy

Can you break that down by money spent on salary/benefits/pensions vs. money spent on weapons systems? USA vs. China.

You have to break down the defense budget of both nations. China- $200 billion USA- $700 billion -China military salaries are way lower than the US. Probably by about 80-90% difference. - constructions and maintenance are far cheaper too. So if you truly break down both defense budget at the moment. They’ll probably be fairly close. If in the future china’s defense budget is the same as the US. It would mean that China would have a bigger budget compared to the US. Probably about 2-3x more spending because of lower wages and getting the same materials at a lower price.

@terryharris1291

2 жыл бұрын

China spends more on its internal security, than its defense budget.That is a very telling story.

@jarheadmstr

2 жыл бұрын

You forget many important factors, 1, there is many more soldiers in the Chinese military, 2 China spends somewhere around half of their military budget on internal affairs, whereas the US doesn’t, so actually that is no true

@terryharris1291

2 жыл бұрын

@@jarheadmstr The internal security budget is 20% more than the defense spending. China’s defense spending, announced on 5 March at a National People’s Congress (NPC) session where the Ministry of Finance unveiled its national budget, amounts to RMB1.107 trillion (USD175 billion). This would put the internal security budget at about USD210 billion.This was from 2018 and it has increased since.

@PumpkinEater-dm1xx

2 жыл бұрын

CHina spend a lot of money on internal affairs. Military salaries won't affect budget that much

@pedromiguelalmeida4446

2 жыл бұрын

So banana, no one here yet saw how china is getting broke (real estate, banks, industry, commercial bans on inports...) and how they're dealing with power shortage, mostly due to lack of coal? no? you all just blind or pretending to be? Not saying the US is a role model to follow, just putting my head out of the window to the real world

where's the section about command and control? also, alliances?

What did you exactly answer. You just kept asking the questions we all have

Simply divert supply chains out of China.

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

Once the missiles launch the supplies will dry up anyway. Anti-ship missiles aren't terribly smart on their own -- especially when the long range sensor assets are under attack -- and it only takes one container ship being mistaken for a juicy aircraft carrier or amphibious assault ship to really scare away the civilian traffic who were sailing to China.

@victorye7150

2 жыл бұрын

China controls global industrial supply chain. Nice try!

Worried about the CCP’s cyber and potential AI capabilities. However, their hardwares are crap.

@ueks69

2 жыл бұрын

I bet most of them allready are tagetted by NSA virusses

@changtang428

2 жыл бұрын

我们的基础设施硬件是现在地球上最好的。因为你的国家没有

little birdy told me they need to cull the population :P my ride on lawnmower needs more grass to eat LOL

The presenters appearance has evolved drastically since he started doing the series. Strikingly so

@faisalovi9309

2 жыл бұрын

His teeth have been going down the drain though...

@aalok9799

2 жыл бұрын

@@faisalovi9309 Why whiten it when you can make it golden bro😉

@faisalovi9309

2 жыл бұрын

@@aalok9799 Now that was funny.. :D :D

@K1ddkanuck

2 жыл бұрын

I want his tee shirt. It's hilarious.

They need to get reliable electricity lol

@ttemp2631

2 жыл бұрын

Europe, India, middle East do not need to get reliable energy lmao

@papabear90

2 жыл бұрын

Yeha because the US pipeline didn't get shut down and hacked for weeks did it 😂

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

No such thing as reliable....

@FrostbitexP

2 жыл бұрын

@@willrobinson9767 Well, being able to put fuel into your powerplants would be a good start to getting there, dont you think. Imagine if the 60% of the US was having regular blackouts, and scheduled to expect black outs until spring. Yet China the "superpower" is having just that.

@willrobinson9767

2 жыл бұрын

@@FrostbitexP Every country's power grid is going down including the US...

Americans talk about their enormous military spending yet don’t realize that a large chunk of that spending goes to 1. Military upkeep and 2. Bases abroad.

@pirateonthetrack1049

2 жыл бұрын

Corruption is widespread in our military

@rahadiwibowo

2 жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

The PLA isn't short on wasteful spending either. They spend way more time on grand parades and patriotic indoctrination when they could be out training in the field and figuring out how their equipment will hold up away from the luxury of garrison maintenance.

@gallaugal9099

2 жыл бұрын

Price to pay to keep the enormous military

@davout5775

2 жыл бұрын

Considering the US military is training and researching more than the Chinese it is safe to say that the US is still good

i found a way to beat the adds on youtube. click on another random youtube clip on the right, then quickly go to the back up arrow up top left corner and the same youtube clip quickly comes back without having to watch an annoying ad

How y'all doing ?

The metal that goes into building a weapon, ship or bullet cost roughly the same for China than for the USA...actually, most commodities have international markets that pretty much sets global prices, stuff like food, gasoline, technology, etc, will have a similar cost thru many countries with minimal variations. So the US budget being several times the Chinese budget actually does matter...a lot. The cost of labor or "mouths to feed", and their salaries might be marginally smaller for China... but inefficiency, larger baseline troops force levels, and the expensive catch-up costs of coming behind the curve in a technological arms race makes those labor savings a complete crapshoot. Truth be told the most expensive "currency" to acquire when it comes to war is EXPERIENCE...the US has plenty of institutional experience fighting many types of wars, with many different countries all over the globe...China in contrast has extremely limited experience actually fighting, and even less experience winning a large modern war. China has way more catch-up to do than their paper strength would suggest.

The thing is though that you did not mention other military powers in this such as Japan, Vietnam and India…. Who are also worried about China’s dominance and who the US only have to help.

@enachioken

2 жыл бұрын

Absolutely great point. All of whom are US allies.

@cliffa2901

2 жыл бұрын

I'm very sure Vietnam dosnt need your help. They know what happened the last time You helped.

@iHaveGrudgeAgainstUT

2 жыл бұрын

The US does not help, the US capitalise. I wouldn't be suprised that the US would actually work WITH the Chinese to capitalise on Japan, Vietnam and India, because this way it profits the US a lot more.

@crazyjohnhoward

2 жыл бұрын

@@enachioken hahahaha.. Vietnam is a US ally?🤣

@enachioken

2 жыл бұрын

@@crazyjohnhoward they are all but allies especially against Chinese expansion. They not officially military allies but economically they have a 21 year old bilateral economic agreement.

9:23 This is tedros adhanom, Director-General of the World Health Organization, when the tplf was on the throne in ethiopia

Good luck we're a ocean away.

No offend, in my opinion US only won the world war 2, and they failed almost all the wars after that.

@Slimdaddywills

2 жыл бұрын

They didn’t win ww2, The Soviets were the ones that took Berlin, not the Americans

@jw715

2 жыл бұрын

@@Slimdaddywills they sold all kinds of war materials to Japan at the first couple years. all those materials help the Japan invade China and the other Asian countries, millions of people got killed

And tell me what is the hourly rates of labour in both the countries…and now tell me how stupid it is to get the nominal dollar value for budget comparisons 😂

Like the shirt. I see the duck and platypus. What is the last animal?

China does not need a big navy to get it into trouble all over the world. That's a US franchise to keep. China just needs to keep adding missile inventory, range, speed, unpredictability, and power a la HGV. Improve targetting. A navy is a necessary cost. It's the factories, trading, and IT business which gives China it's real power.

@chinadollfmd

2 жыл бұрын

The factories that are now laying off? The trade that is now moving out of China due to high cost? The IT leaders that just lost billions due to the tech clampdown? You have to look at China's GDP, it consist heavily on housing and see where that is going after Evergrande. The debt crisis in China is now going to expand, China is spending billions on arms and people are starving.

@heinrichhimmler3781

2 жыл бұрын

@@chinadollfmd Thats One Reason Why Xi Jiniping Introduce 2025 Plan.They Gonna Reform China Export Base Economy to Domestic Market Base Economy With In 2025

@joem0088

2 жыл бұрын

@@chinadollfmd US ports have long queues achored outside waiting unload Chinese containers. China FDI in 2020 was world #1. Property is not great but US had their 2008 property problem, Europe and Japan had theirs too. Doesn't look like an end-of-China story. As to defense, China spends much less as % GDP than the US. In fact China spent about the same on defense as US 2020Y interest payment on Fed debt. On debt, Chinese public debts are low, corporate and household debts are over 90% local currency which makes it manageable. You won't see another Argentina dollar crisis in China. Don't worry for China. Looks pretty good from here.

@theylaughatmynickname4860

2 жыл бұрын

@@chinadollfmd you’ve been religiously swallowing propaganda instead of looking at facts and statistics.

@ueks69

2 жыл бұрын

Yes if you have a market, eating yourself, does nothing

They all coordinate at the tanning bed for sure

"Gifting loans to developing nations" - please explain.

@TenOrbital

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah more like concealing a debt trap.

@angryatheist

2 жыл бұрын

A loan with no interest that can be repaid or remain owed with thought towards a later , you owe me mate , the US does a similar thing with its so called foreign aid only the opposite direction American loans are in the form of extremely high interest rates that are impossible to repay thereby keeping the poor poor

@j.j7380

2 жыл бұрын

@@angryatheist chinas lows have high interest rates and countries are defaulting and China has even taken back some of the projects like a port for example.

@MukimukiRunner

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah he said they have no military impact at all then a minute later he goes on to say how private assets can be used for military purposes and shoes the “string of pearls” and how those development ports could be used for military purposes…

@TenOrbital

2 жыл бұрын

@@MukimukiRunner - The main problem is the USN and the Indian navy and RAN have more bases and ships and planes along the 'string of pearls' than the PLAN ever will.

GRANT'S BACK!!!

Quantity has a certain appeal over Quality!

That why Malaysia defence minister needs big bro point of view in anything. He is a big fan of prc.

@cikgutinghuaeechannel4782

2 жыл бұрын

@Pangpi Dawang sorry bro, that not mean we gonna give our sea to big bloody bro communist. Big bully of asean. But cry like baby when lost to Taiwan in badminton double in Olympic.

@changtang428

2 жыл бұрын

区域霸主这个词更适合世界对中国的称呼，作为一个中国人很乐意见到来自邻居的惧怕

I fear for a future where a civilization that has been ALWAYS authoritarian and even totalitarian for the past 2000-4000 years is the leading power of the world.

@khan-cricket

2 жыл бұрын

Sad but it is human nature to look for strong leader and it is also human nature to be temped by that power

@kongwee1978

2 жыл бұрын

@@khan-cricket Yes, even US citizen want a strong leader but in contradiction do not want the government to control personal activities. That why US is in a mess now.

@khan-cricket

2 жыл бұрын

@@kongwee1978 Yeah. It is like " it is not a problem until it is your problem" People just didn't see far enough for the consequences of the current decision

@Minchya

2 жыл бұрын

@@khan-cricket Except when that strong leader expects everyone to kowtow and pay tribute.

@khan-cricket

2 жыл бұрын

@@Minchya Yep and whole society think that it is normal thing to do and still act as if high and all mighty. That is how ridiculous African dictator looks like. Almighty in a mediocre territory

Whats the name for the music being used.

It's when!

Well, in a cage match on China's home turf your points have some relevance, but it completely misses a key point....which is that the US isn't alone in that region, while, especially from a military perspective, China is (with the one possible caveat being Russia, which is doubtful). So, it's not just the US regionally deployed military against the Chinese behemoth, it's the US regionally deployed military (backed up by the US's ability to transfer substantial forces from outside the region) AND the US regional allies, many of whom are equally alarmed by China's actions in the region. Then you have sort of quasi-alliances/nations that have narrowly aligned issues with China and align on this with the US and our formal allies, such as India. It's a much more complex equation than your video goes into, and I think your video is drawing conclusions that aren't really valid when you look a bit deeper.

@JWPanimation

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it's a fairly shallow analysis of the situation looking a just one data point of military capability between the US and China.

@HDsharp

2 жыл бұрын

Except no one is believing the lies of the US. One by one are opting to not be part of the anti chinese agenda.

@androidx99

2 жыл бұрын

@@JWPanimation who are these one by one's that are joining china's side?

@JWPanimation

2 жыл бұрын

@@androidx99 I'm not sure what he's talking about. As far as I know China has Pakistan, North Korea and a hesitant Russia.

@jerrysong9957

2 жыл бұрын

US and its allies always fight together，but it doesn't stop their lost.

You didn't include the cost of manufacturing the arms. China is a lot cheaper. As the largest industrial power, it can replace equipment faster.

@chinadollfmd

2 жыл бұрын

China doesn't have enough raw materials, they import. If they are in war, that supply chain is cut off since all of the neighbouring countries hate China. China needs Australia for iron ore and coal, but they made that country a nuclear target. I don't think any country that has the battlefront at their doorstep has an advantage. The moment those modern tier 1 cities get hit with bombs, people will turn on the CCP.

@pauljosephsoh1732

2 жыл бұрын

@@chinadollfmd in this war China will not need to build cities only weapons.

@kalbs89

2 жыл бұрын

I’ve been in some of that Chinese hardware and it’s junk

@pauljosephsoh1732

2 жыл бұрын

@@lobbyskids2Chinese products are exported throughout the world. With its superior equipment, USA lost Vietnam and Afghanistan.

@Meinan4370

2 жыл бұрын

Nobody knows about the quality tho

In manpower yes.. but they to overcome about diffeciency in innovation and creativity in technology..

Few things to take into consideration. Military spending means different things in each country. Some countries like the USA include pensions, this therefore inflates the budget. Other support for arms countries or health care can also be found in budgets all of which obscures the real spending. Also China doesn't need a budget like the USA's because they don't have an international reach. China at present are a regional military power and therefore don't need 10+ aircraft carriers or dozens of military bases abroad therefore saving tens of billions per-year.

Is that his natural teeth colour or he doesn't brush twice a day.... I can't help but keep thinking as a dental student

@9mully

2 жыл бұрын

Just a regular dude , keeping it all natural

@ritemolawbks8012

2 жыл бұрын

That was distracting. I couldn't finish.

@Shottii978

2 жыл бұрын

Lol... he got them fix tho.. Since ur a dental student, take a look of some videos from 6 to 8 months back.. And u can't tell me if I'm wrong or not...

@Shottii978

2 жыл бұрын

@@9mully yea a regular British dude...

@FukUrToS

2 жыл бұрын

He's from Europe they all have non pefect teeth

I don't think China is thinking of the return of the central empire or thinking of overtaking US militarily, their defense budget is only 1.7% of their GDP while US is spending 3.7%. Chinese GDP is also smaller. They're only thinking about defense of their borders and the improvement of the livelihood of the people. You are worrying too much. Take a deep breathe and go to sleep.

@andrewmckenzie292

2 жыл бұрын

US deficit is also at 125% of GDP and this is without a major war to fight. China is quite a lot lower and most likely would be fighting in her own backyard. The US would need to balance the Pacific War vs China to making sure her eastern coast still has adequate defences. The US dollar status does give US huge ability to have a large debt, but this is already been utilised to fund Biden's stimulus cheques. US deficit would probably need to return to at least pre-2008 levels to fight a major war (ideally about late 90s levels). US does have strong allies in the Pacific Japan, Australia, Taiwan, and to a lesser extent South Korea (they need to keep an eye on NK though) and India too but they are limited by geography (Himalayas) and having to keep an eye on Pakistan. Maybe Chinese delicate political situation will turn against them, but Chinese living standards are approaching levels of poorer European countries so this may not be easy as it seems, if Chinese government is smart enough to at least make a bit of effort to keep their people on side. I'd say China could easily defeat SK, Japan, Taiwan, even throw in Philippines and Vietnam as well (not vs Vietnam in Vietnam though, they have a good history of defending themselves). So despite how some of the rhetoric from the USA and the west (including my own country Australia unfortunately) sounds, at the very most west and allies might be able to make China fight really hard with heavy losses despite fighting so close to their own country and this might be enough to cripple internal political support but its by no means a given for the west/allies. China's lack of recent military experience also works against them, but if China fully mobilised their economy for a war of defence (even if they were actually still offensive but were close to defensive eg. Taiwan) the production would be truly enormous, possibly exceeding USA in WW2 in equivalent time scale..bearing in mind USA then too had similar issues with lack of recent experience. Also USA's recent experience is mostly against non-peer enemies so this counts against them also. Think if the battle is near China, China wins but maybe with very heavy losses so then the political situation would be critical. eg. China invades Taiwan and loses a few hundred thousand personnel or more for a island with strategic significance but probably not economy/natural resources for the cost of so many lives, many in China who were allowed to think it might be questioning whether it was worth it which might hurt the political stability.

@davout5775

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe you are just blind

@ernestkhalimov1007

2 жыл бұрын

China's GDP already surpassed the USA 2 years ago and this year China became the world's richest country

@davout5775

2 жыл бұрын

@@ernestkhalimov1007 China never became the world's richest country and no China is second on GDP

@jkschang

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, but that is to improve the livelihood of the people. USA spent on defense more than the sum total of the next 11 countries put together, including China. USA put more priority on defense; China is putting more priorities on livelihood of the people.

Can you discuss the last incident of us submarine in south china sea last week?

The host's movement made me check if my playback speed was higher than 1.0

China has a macro issues that can easily switch the balance of power if trade routes are blocked off. It has very little natural resources relative to it's huge population and army. Hitler didnt lose because of a lack of technology and military spending - hitler lost the war of attrition because Germany relied very heavily on imported raw materials. China will be in a similar situation in an actual war - with more mouths to feed, and a demographic timebomb / ageing population. I suspect this is why they are so insistent on the SeaChode (nine dash line) territorial claim.... and why they are so pissed Australia is going to be a hub for nuclear subs - in an actual war, all raw materials that feed china will effectively be cut off. They cannot win.

@easonhuang7117

2 жыл бұрын

And if any country tries to block China, China will retaliate with ballistic missiles directly to its homeland.

@easonhuang7117

2 жыл бұрын

@@benaye1 Cutting off China’s power supply effectively threaten the existence of China, so China will retaliate without giving a F about if you are a NATO country. It can’t be worse than mutual destruction. Think about why a country have to be mutually destroyed with China for Taiwan. Try it. 🥴🥴

@easonhuang7117

2 жыл бұрын

@@benaye1 And if the US wants to arm Taiwan and Japan with nukes, China will arm any country in the world with nukes and let’s have a party of nuclear weapons. 🥴🥴

@norbertcheung

2 жыл бұрын

China never wants a war. China's main focus is on building the economy. The US people never wants a war. Only the corrupted politicians and the military industrial complex thing differently

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

Right, Maritime SE Asia has been heading anti-China despite their "non-aligned" policy because of all the hostile acts with Chinese fishing hordes emptying the local seas. Indonesia alone could make it really hurt for China by stopping ships going through their waters -- they're already readily suspicious of Chinese, Communists, and acts of anti-Islam -- and along with Vietnam and the Philippines would easily empty the PRC's treasury by forcing them to use more expensive overland routes for basic food and fuel. I wouldn't be surprised if undeployed PLA forces were even left largely unmolested, just so they can eat through the Mainland's dwindling supplies and fuel unrest among China's civilians to cause even more division in operational efforts.

VisualPolitik has a recent love affair with China it's ridiculous 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@Gilgamesh12382

2 жыл бұрын

its more of a hate affair

@papabear90

2 жыл бұрын

The fact of the matter is, the US armed forces primary objective is to generate profit for the military industrial complex. They haven't won a war for literally decades.

Would you like to borrow my toothpaste??

His teeth so yellow he made the sun jealous

Doesn’t have to surpass it, just has to know it can send it back to the stone age and visa versa. Anything extra is just waste

@AeneasGemini

2 жыл бұрын

They can't though, the biggest military weakness of China is their total lack of allies. The US has made deals with many countries around the world but China has alienated almost everyone, all the regional powers are against it. In the event that China tries to coerce a country in it's own region it will find itself surrounded by enemies with the US riding in to take advantage. Chinese military is royally screwed in an offensive war.

@vliu293

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini There are only 3 countries in the world that can gain super hegemony, the United States, China, and Russia. Without China and Russia, the rest of the world together cannot defeat the United States. Likewise, without the US and Russia, the rest of the world together cannot defeat China. Do you think the P5 seats in the Security Council were gained by reasoning?

@unserkatzenland8884

2 жыл бұрын

@@vliu293 France, Britain, (KMT) China: Well, yes.

@unserkatzenland8884

2 жыл бұрын

@@vliu293 I would argue Brazil, India, and Indonesia can also gain super hegemony, they have large natural reserves, young workforce, and geopolitical advantages. If these three finally solve their political problems, and build their infrastructures (which they are), they are bound to be as influential if not more than China right now.

@aino10shi

2 жыл бұрын

@@AeneasGemini China has Best Korea! Our glorious leader will protect us from the imperialist Amerikkkans

China might spend less than the USA on military but they get more equipment for their buck. They also don't leave it in Afganistan.

@doujinflip

2 жыл бұрын

But does their equipment work as advertised? They're already getting complaints of low quality and high amounts of downtime in peace, imagine those things in the degraded maintenance environment of war.

@lvl5969

2 жыл бұрын

They just increased the Taliban defence budget by 85 billion dollars..😄

@johntheaccountant5594

2 жыл бұрын

@@doujinflip They should sell them to the Italians. The Italians never fire them, as soon as they see the enemy. they just drop them and surrender.....LOL

Watching this reminded me to brush my teeth.

Numbers don't equate to trained soldiers

Oh Gosh, The Yellow-stained teeth guy! AGAIN! Where's the other guy?

@silveriver9

2 жыл бұрын

Lol

@jspec-vz3mc

2 жыл бұрын

That had to hurt. Go easy on him, he's British after all.

@shryggur

2 жыл бұрын

I've been missing his Scottish accent :D

What makes the Central East Asian region the most important? Its geography? The only trade that passes through the region is trade either originating or terminating in the region, unlike Central America or the Eastern Mediterranean. As for China’s immediate geography, that tends to be a detriment. While the island chains may allow protection they inhibit force projection making the Seas around the the Central East Asian region a global backwater. Its natural resources and mineral wealth? If that were true China wouldn’t need to control the Straits of Malacca or spend billions on its Belt and Road to Africa. The Central East Asian Region is resource poor and so not nearly as important as the Arabian Peninsula or the Amazon region of South America. The only factor the the region may claim is population density, I suppose, but history has shown that just being a dense biological mass does not indicate importance.

Xi is pronounced like the letter C or "see"

@user-gf4yv8oe6w

2 жыл бұрын

like "she"

I wonder if Chinese missile's come with 12months warranty 🙃

China is just a paper warrior , they were hiding their soldiers death when they suffered casualties with India 😂they can just bark , definitely can't fight

@ED-vm5oy

2 жыл бұрын

What about 🇺🇸 who give up for Taliban.

@theoneemperor5396

2 жыл бұрын

@@ED-vm5oy fool, the us didnt give up squat, they whacked the talibans till all of them ran to the mountain and hid, once us left afghan to its govt, these rats came crawling out and the afghan army gave up like a loser

@miaorenfeng1

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, PLA can't fight. kzread.info/dash/bejne/eayEtLOmis-fm6w.html&ab_channel=InsiderPaper

no way.... russia has the most anti air defences of any country, there is huge equipement left over from USSR

Minute details such as providing proper MREs is not easy. I don't think the pla have such capabilities among others

That hanshake hurted to watch, im reporting video for content that can demage u lol

The moment a PLA soldier thinks he's going to get his big bowl of lunchtime rice, meat and veg a minute later than noon sharp, he'll down his weapon and weep for his mama.

@kyawmintpho5696

2 жыл бұрын

Don't mock the PLA with stereotypes on India army, not funny.

@franciscoresendiz4295

2 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂

im not siding either the US or China. But i like the fact that there are China + US in this world to keep each other in check. If u think the US is the true heroic justice of this world, u need to study more. China isnt a saint neither. Therefore, its good to have them both to compete. Competition is beneficial to the world

@nanxingluo4902

2 жыл бұрын

a very sensible take

@vinnidavinci3932

2 жыл бұрын

China is an evil country though.

@anonymous.youtuber

2 жыл бұрын

@@vinnidavinci3932 Maybe countries become evil when they realize they are more powerful than others ?

@alexjgilpin

2 жыл бұрын

@@bluebottlecoffeeaddict6529 Well, they do put them in concentration camps. Also the whole trying to invade Taiwan is dickish.

@benchan6488

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexjgilpin Well, the whole concentration camp thing is full of holes. I mean, just take a walk around Xinjiang/Uighur, or open any random video of people doing that - but I digress. China is not the country at war non-stop for 3 decades...

We can only hope

Two versions of a stealth bomber?. . .

Can we take a minute to apreciate Grant's platypus t-shirt?

@Ayushmishra-gz4pg

2 жыл бұрын

no

@user-us4hl3zr2b

2 жыл бұрын

I appreciate his teeth

How does the balance shift, if taken into consideration both countries allies? I think that the US, for the most part, has a friendlier relation with other countries. Especially in Asia. But I could be wrong.

@Ayushmishra-gz4pg

2 жыл бұрын

No, US has a record of betrayal in Asia. Particularly Indians have deep seeded suspicion of US due to its support to Pakistan while their proxies bombed us. US had proved its betrayal capabilities in Afghanistan as well very recently.

@overlordborn6131

2 жыл бұрын

@@Ayushmishra-gz4pg Hey wumao ,you might loose 50 cent 😂

@heinrichhimmler3781

2 жыл бұрын

Not At All Lots Of Asian Countries With China Only Few Countries Play Role Against China ( ex: India,Japan,philippines) China Win In This Time We Have To Agree .

@overlordborn6131

2 жыл бұрын

@@heinrichhimmler3781 India superpower 2050😎

@JWPanimation

2 жыл бұрын

You are not wrong.

Lol

Putin ride bear, Chairman Poo ride Panda

@Gamingdan867

2 жыл бұрын

Panda and bear are both cool Animals :)