May Allah SWT blesses you, Brother Paul, for your excellent and enjoyable contents

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you kindly

@proudsaracen6469

3 жыл бұрын

@Iyas kelu I thought God cannot be the author of confusion? What does the Quran say? And [for] their saying, "Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah." And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise. It answers it. Jesus did not die, he was raised to God. This is not a matter of issue to Muslims. It is however a matter of issue for Christians and not from the Quran but from your own books. You even admitted that many people have their own versions after reading your books. The Hadiths are recorded actions and sayings of the prophet. If the chain of narration is weak, meaning the people who passed down the narration are found to be untrustworthy, then it is rejected. If the Hadiths do not match the Quran, it is rejected. It’s pretty simple.

@abdulibnabdul1666

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

@CM-nb8rs

3 жыл бұрын

@@abdulibnabdul1666 You must be mad..total nonsense ……go read your Quran…Hadeeths..Tafsirs…Sun setting in murky waters🤣..goat eating forgotten Surahs..Ayesha hadeeth..38 different Qurans…

@ayubkhan5834

Жыл бұрын

@@BloggingTheology qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq

#FreePalestine 💔💔

@abdebnadam6237

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

Great effort editing the long interview. Thanks

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

Your contents are always informative, Thank you for sharing this

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you think so!

@martinkent333

3 жыл бұрын

Brainwashing is so COOL!

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinkent333 Stop "trolling" this channel. Trolling is brainwashing !!

@abdebnadam8241

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

May Allah bless you for your work brother Paul

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Appreciated

@abdebnadam6237

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

Ever read "How Jesus Became Christian" by Barrie Wilson? Great book.

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Yes. Good stuff.

Alhamdulillah Bro Paul Williams 🤲🏾👍🏽

Fascinating discussion! James gives his insight into this much revered historical event. Your own observation about 'others coming alive' at the same time needs a further analysis and discussion another day. Thanks Paul. Any idea of interviewing N T wright on new book on Paul?

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

I never thought of inviting him! Good idea.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Hey Sydney.... I agree with you.

@Chandransingham

3 жыл бұрын

@@BloggingTheology N T Wright and Tom Holland were the two main speakers at the Saturday 15th May 2021 - Unbelievable Conference attended by 2500 people world over by Zoom. It was good.

Hi, Paul. What a deep conversation. I love every single your video I've watched. So I wonder, if you make such as conversation about Muhammad political journey with an academic expert, it'd be interesting.

@martinkent333

3 жыл бұрын

Brainwashing is so cool. Sleazy and slimy, two godly things!

@najmighanihaider9323

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinkent333 Oh bother!

Hai.. you both are so funny.. thank you..

Amazing video good stuff

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed

Paul, wallahi I love you for Allah's sake.

Paul seriously needs to invite Dr. Sami Ameri to his channel. That would be some new next level theological conversation.

@martinkent333

3 жыл бұрын

Brainwashing is so cool, daddy!

@BenM61

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinkent333 Why don’t you lay down on that couch and tell us all about it.

@valerossi823

3 жыл бұрын

and Dr Jay Smith..

@martinkent333

3 жыл бұрын

When Jesus comes and kills the 6 billion non-Christians, can we fuck them first?

@valerossi823

3 жыл бұрын

@@martinkent333 what are yoi talking about

Blessing

Peace be with u brother paul. Eid mubarak. may allah give u health and long life inshallah. For us muslims u r a light that shines to give the sight for everyone who seek the truth about the true religion of god and the reality of who was the real jesus. Thank u so much from Algeria.

@lmn3668

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

*لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *لا إله إلا ﷲ* *محمد رسول ﷲ*

@lmn3668

3 жыл бұрын

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

By the way what's the probable interpretation of sura 4:157? Was Jesus Christ swooned or substituted?

Interesting 🧐

Great 👍

Thanks

Brother, please invite Dr. Ali Ataie from Zaytuna College.

This is probably your most interesting video. By its nature it is inconclusive and Tabor wisely leaves room for a variety of possibilities, rather than simply pushing a sceptic's agenda! It is thought provoking and plays on the assumptions of sceptics, yet there is also a seemingly honest quest going on there with Tabor, as to the nature of the resurrection. One fact that we cannot get past however, is that without the Crucifixion and the Resurrection, there would be no faith in Yeshua or 'christianity'. As contemporary theologians agree, the apostles experienced something tangibly which they understood to be the resurrected Jesus. Without this, there would be no Christianity in the first place. Another thing that is generally the case is that the crucifixion and utter humiliation of Jesus on the cross, is NOT something that any of his followers would in the wildest imaginations, ever have wanted to 'invent'! Peter according to the gospels was rebuked by Jesus when Jesus told him that he was going to be crucified in Jerusalem! For the disciples/apostles, crucifixion of Jesus was the very last thing they wanted for Jesus and they shrunk back in horror at the thought of it! They believed he was the Messiah, but they didn't want a 'crucified Messiah'! This is why no follower of Jesus would invent the crucifixion, nor make a point of even speaking about it....UNLESS, there was a positive outcome - in this case the defiance of death because of the resurrection which they all testified to! The crucifixion was otherwise a humiliating and shameful circumstance and had it all ended there, then even his followers would have deemed Jesus to be a 'failed messiah'! Tacitus in his Annals 15 record of Jesus's crucifixion, stated that the 'movement' was put down "for a while" but then 'rose up again' or 'reemerged', "shortly afterwards"....but WHY? In fact Tacitus's record, inadvertently synchronises with the Resurrection! it was only the Resurrection that convinced the followers, that their crucified master, was indeed the Messiah!

@MonsieurMaskedMan

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah i guess he did not died and bring back to life as a spirit again, but idk because in luke and john they met with him again but have not admit to be a resurrected body aka spirit/ghost/spook so he may just met them in the flesh fulfilling his sign of jonah but then again not really sure about that, one thing for sure is he is not killed nor cruxified

@peaceinjesus5221

3 жыл бұрын

​@@MonsieurMaskedMan Well you can choose your own beliefs. I've chosen mine because I believe them to be true - Christ was crucified and he resurrected in Body which is why he left an Empty grave. If Christ didn't resurrect in his body, then his body would still be in the grave and there would have been NO Christianity....and no Islam! Tacitus a Roman lawyer and historian working in the Roman military under the Emperor, recorded in his history, Annals 15:44 that Christ was crucified by Pontius Pllate in the reign of Emperor Tiberias: *"Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilate,* and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their center and become popular." - Annals 15:44

@MonsieurMaskedMan

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah if i was a jew i will not believe in Yeshua, he is put to the test that he has promise and it didn't get fulfilled instead he is humiliated and treated as the enemy of the state i will treat him as an impostor a failure and not a messenger of god if i were a jew, but because he did not get killed nor cruxified and did not get resurrected as a spirit i belief him as the messiah the great messenger of god

@peaceinjesus5221

3 жыл бұрын

@@MonsieurMaskedMan That's entirely your choice! There are plenty of Jews who DO believe in Yeshua. There is a whole Messianic Jewish Movement of many thousands. Even in the 1st century there were many many thousands of Jews who were the first believers in Yeshua and today there are about 350,000 Messianic Jewish believers in Yeshua. Unfortunately Sir, if Jesus wasn't crucified then he is NOT the Messiah, according to scripture.

@dantejager9296

2 жыл бұрын

@@MonsieurMaskedMan There are some educated Muslims that admit Jesus was crucified and resurrected. The evidence that Jesus died are too strong.

May allah protect u and bless

@lmn3668

3 жыл бұрын

capitalize A in Allah!

Brother Paul can you make a video on History of Palastine, and Zionism!!! Many people think Palastinians are the ones to invade land! And I'm shocked at that how they say "Israel is the best state in middle east", please make a video about history of this land, people need to know the facts!

@khaireghani2770

3 жыл бұрын

Scofield bible map printed 1905 no where Israel was mentioned.But the map of Palestine was glaringly and boldly printed in all it's early publication.

@fs5297

3 жыл бұрын

@@khaireghani2770 Indeed! Israel just came into being in 1948 after Nakba occupation! Before it, forever Palastine was there.

I love you for the sake of Allah. I have become a fan of your channel. Maa Shaa Allah.

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks and welcome

In my opinion there is no issue on what Paul's view of the resurrection was. He was a Pharisaic Hellenistic Jew and in that context it is understandable that the vision he had was of a glorified incorporeal Jesus. I see it as a mini apotheosis as in that Jesus was exalted by God for his deeds and his sacrifice for the Kingdom of God (Paul later developing that sacrifice as an atonement for sins). My only issue is on if that is what the other disciples/apostles believed as well, specially the "Pillars" (James, Peter and John). As Dr. Tabor mentions, Paul is the first and only firsthand "eyewitness" account of the "resurrection" of Jesus and he says that he appeared to the Apostles, including his brother James. Did they had the same vision as Paul or was it some other type of revelation? It could be argued that the Jesus followers though they were not Pharisees, they did believe in the resurrection of the dead in the Final Day. Did they then realized as also Paul mentions in Colossians 1:18 that Jesus was the "firstborn from among the dead" but not the only one, thus my "mini apotheosis"? For me it's kind of weird that the Jesus followers would believe such a thing. They seem to me too conservative and removed from that Hellenistic world view to hold that belief. But certainly they believed something happened to Jesus after his crucifixion. What was it? We only depend on Paul's testimony and we all know the differences between him and the original movement.

Sir can u make a video bringing in light on early cristians groups which wrote that crucifixtion of jesus did not occur.!!

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Yes... I think that's a good idea too, especially since the crucifixion of Jesus is a core belief of Orthodox Christianity while Muslims disagree with it. Right?

@Asiyah2000

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 the reality and rationality disagrees too not only Muslims

Quite interesting because its very similar to Islamic beliefs on humans and the soul etc. Great content

When Paul rushed to Arabia,he discovered there two sets of scriptures,The Nazarene gospel of the prophet Isa who came to the Israelites,and the mythological Isa,the fertility god.Having no special use for the Nazarene Gospel,he simply ignored it,leaving it to be used after his death by Luke and John.What fascinated him was the rich and highly meaningful recorded lore concerning the Isa who was a god and also the son of god,capable of assuming human form to die as men do,yet rise from the dead.By a highly sophisticated use of this lore,he succeeded in transforming the primitive heresy of the Nazarene Way into a great faith whose central figure,Jesus Christ,was identified as Jeshu Bar Nagara......From the book of Kamal Salibi,Conspiracy in Jerusalem.

I can never believe that the Oneness of the Almighty Creator and the First Commandment to be of so much confusion in the form of Trinity, even to the highly intellectual... The Israelites all through the ages never had this dilemma... Paul (Saul of Tarsus) a non-disciple of Jesus managed to introduce the unthinkable and the unbelievable!!!

For anyone who might be interested. Gary Harbermas, historian/professor provides convincing evidence of the resurrection.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Have you read any of his books?

@johnpatriki5722

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 no only lectures. But I will look into this. Thanks

@BenM61

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 He created a lot of hoopla about his new book and the new evidence he discovered. His minimal facts argument seems shallow and not convincing. He just rehashes old arguments and presents them as new. Watch PAULOGIA for videos discussing Habermas’s no evidence. PAULOGIA is the page of a former Christian where he discuses all Christian topics including Dale Allison’s new book.

@BenM61

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnpatriki5722 Here is PAULOGIA talking about Gary Habermas’ new book: kzread.info/dash/bejne/hqSJu7t_htnNmdo.html

@irshaadpangaker5085

Жыл бұрын

Gary harbermas talks hogwash

🤯

What on earth is Professor James D Tabor talking about?

@justarshad8354

3 жыл бұрын

Lol calm down buddy Am still trying to figure out myself 🧐

@thinkislamcheckmychannel

3 жыл бұрын

He rambles which makes it difficult to follow.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@thinkislamcheckmychannel I agree with you. The Gospel accounts of the resurrection of Jesus make more sense to me.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@You Say I like to read all 4 Gospels. Why do you ask?

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@You Say I do compare them and I try to understand that each author gives a somewhat different perspective from their own individual perception and eyewitness accounts. I have no problem with the differences. These early Gospels were first communicated orally to the people and then written down on papyrus.

The problem for Islam is that today's bible and gospels were around at the time when Islam began and when the text if the Quran was written. This text says Allah endorses the books that came before, so it endorses the gospel stories which include the resurrection story. So when Muslims criticise the gospel stories they criticise their religion, or agree there is a contradiction in Islam. To say the gospels were corrupted goes against the endorsement of gospels that were around then with no mention of the text being corrupted.

@ibrahimmonaf345

3 жыл бұрын

Can you tell me the verse reference. Not debating just wanting to know??

@Asiyah2000

3 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahimmonaf345 he really don't know what he is talking about just troll😪

@dythaka

5 ай бұрын

No Sir. Islam was there from the beginning. Islam is by definition "the total submission to the word of God". Therefore all if creation including Adam as are/is Muslim

Why are many people against the idea of GOD the Father, Christ and the Holy Spirit working together as One?

@fikarrusdiawan9562

3 жыл бұрын

Because it is the concept/doctrine of the Oneness of God which is neither good nor true. 🧐

@pewpew9020

3 жыл бұрын

1. Because it is not in the bible 2. Polytheism concept like in Hindus or other Pagan Religion 3. The concept of oneness of God is the hard of Abrahamic Faith, see Judaism and Islam. 4. Simply opposite of the origin teaching of Jesus. You can actually learn how trinity become how it is today by reading the history of the church. 5. This concept is the core of salvation in Abrahamic Faith, Islam and Judaism.

@celticwinter

3 жыл бұрын

I'd guess because they foolishly assume from the world they know, that God, a being outside time and space, must somehow conform to human cognition.

@fikarrusdiawan9562

3 жыл бұрын

@@celticwinter God is called God not without straight and clear reasons. How could God want Himself to obscuration something with childbearing/being human? Humans are one of the Supreme Creator's creations.

@celticwinter

3 жыл бұрын

@@fikarrusdiawan9562 see, you're unable to even conceive something which doesn't align with your human perception of what God should be like. You're asking if God can enter into creation (i.e. is an incarnation possible). This is already being discussed over and over using islamic scripture. Spoiler: the answer is yes. You can believe what you want, but it isn't necessarily closer to the truth. Even the incarnation, being an incarnation, is less of an antropomorphism than allah having two actual right hands and an actual shin. But do as you please

My argument in my essay on the crucifixion is that even if Jesus had resurrected on the third day after he was crucified (assuming he was, which isn't at odds with Islam despite what most people think - see Todd Lawson), it doesn't have to be to save us from our sins. It could have just been Allah vindicating Jesus' christhood against his enemies. Since Islam has evidence for being true, any historical evidence for Jesus' resurrection is moot and has no bearing on the veracity of Christianity.

@babylonking9896

3 жыл бұрын

Disciples of Christ witnessed the Crucifixion, end of the story. Were you or mohamad with them and witnessed something different? Christians are not going to take the testimony of someone from Arabia who came over 600 years later telling us contradicting story. Don't waste your breath, islam only offers speculations, but provide ZERO evidence.

@Khaled-kj1pq

3 жыл бұрын

@@babylonking9896 As I said, Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection isn't at odds with Islamic theology (people think Qur'an denies crucifixion but it doesn't - see Ali Ataie's lecture). I have a playlist showing tons of evidence Islam is true.

@BenM61

3 жыл бұрын

@@babylonking9896 There is no evidence the apostles of Jesus ever witnessed the crucifiction of Jesus. The gospels talk about some woman being present but no apostles. In fact the gospels tell us they ‘All of them deserted him and fled.’ So where is your evidence the apostles ever witnessed the crucifiction? Also the prophet Muhammad did not claim by his own knowledge that Jesus did not die by crucifixion. In the Quran the speaker and teacher is God himself. And God is the best historian there is. How else would Moses know about the creation of Adam and Eve? How did he know about Noah and Abraham? God told him in the same way we get the information about Jesus in the Quran: from God. Quean 4:162 But those of them well-grounded in knowledge, the faithful ˹who˺ believe in what has been revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ and what was revealed before you-˹especially˺ those who establish prayer-and those who pay alms-tax and believe in Allah and the Last Day, to these ˹people˺ We will grant a great reward. 4:163 Indeed, We have sent revelation to you ˹O Prophet˺ as We sent revelation to Noah and the prophets after him. We also sent revelation to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and his descendants, ˹as well as˺ Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, and Solomon. And to David We gave the Psalms. 4:164 There are messengers whose stories We have told you already and others We have not. And to Moses Allah spoke directly. 4:165 ˹All were˺ messengers delivering good news and warnings so humanity should have no excuse before Allah after ˹the coming of˺ the messengers. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise. 4:166 Yet ˹if you are denied, O Prophet,˺ Allah bears witness to what He has sent down to you-He has sent it with His knowledge. The angels too bear witness. And Allah ˹alone˺ is sufficient as a Witness.

@BenM61

3 жыл бұрын

@@babylonking9896 The house of Christianity is built on sand. The Christians hang their beliefs on speculations and conjectures. There is no clear evidence Jesus was a god equal to God There is no evidence from the Bible the Holy Spirit is a god independent of God. There is no evidence from the Bible that god is a triune or trinity or multiplicity of divine beings and not one indivisible(pure monotheism). Trinity dogma is tritheism and polytheism hiding behind monotheism declaration. It is paganism pure and simple. The death of Jesus as a sacrifice to God for the forgiveness of sins is primitive and crude claimed by a liar and a fraud called Saul of Tarsus. Human sacrifice was a sick way to please the gods but the Christians somehow made it acceptable and desirable. That dogma should definitely be rejected out of hand. It claims God is incapable of forgiveness in contradiction to what Jesus taught. This the truth that God tell us about Jesus and the supposed execution: 4:152 As for those who believe in Allah and His messengers-accepting all; rejecting none-He will surely give them their rewards. And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful. 4:153 The People of the Book demand that you ˹O Prophet˺ bring down for them a revelation in writing from heaven. They demanded what is even greater than this from Moses, saying, “Make Allah visible to us!” So a thunderbolt struck them for their wrongdoing. Then they took the calf for worship after receiving clear signs. Still We forgave them for that ˹after their repentance˺ and gave Moses compelling proof. 4:154 We raised the Mount over them ˹as a warning˺ for ˹breaking˺ their covenant and said, “Enter the gate ˹of Jerusalem˺ with humility.” We also warned them, “Do not break the Sabbath,” and took from them a firm covenant. 4:155 ˹They were condemned˺ for breaking their covenant, rejecting Allah’s signs, killing the prophets unjustly, and for saying, “Our hearts are unreceptive!”-it is Allah Who has sealed their hearts for their disbelief, so they do not believe except for a few- 4:156 and for their denial and outrageous accusation against Mary, 4:157 and for boasting, “We killed the Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” But they neither killed nor crucified him-it was only made to appear so. Even those who argue for this ˹crucifixion˺ are in doubt. They have no knowledge whatsoever-only making assumptions. They certainly did not kill him. 4:158 Rather, Allah raised him up to Himself. And Allah is Almighty, All-Wise.

Again and always, the resurruction dilemma. Do you think they could ever comprehend it ?

@fikarrusdiawan9562

3 жыл бұрын

I think every Prophet and Apostle can prove themselves miraculously. But... 🤔

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Who do you mean by " Do you think they could ever comprehend it"? I think the resurrection of Jesus is a mystery and as limited, finite beings, we cannot comprehend it. Only God knows what really happened. John

@popcornagain7034

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 True. Allah only knows what really happened. Christian laymen are convinced that they know though the more they search and study, the more they question it . However, all refuse the Quranic story. That's why they will never comprehend (not figure out) what happened on the cross .

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@popcornagain7034 I accept your views but to be honest, I have a very difficult time trying to understand the Islamic viewpoint regarding Jesus and the cross and resurrection. Since Muslims believe Jesus never really died on the cross, do they believe in any kind of resurrection of Jesus?

@popcornagain7034

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 To reserrut ,one must die first. I think Jesus himself didn't mention that word or even " I rose from death " . So it's mere assumptions.

John 20:26-29 And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them: then came Jesus, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said, Peace be unto you. Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

Read 1 Ciruthians 15:1-12 The resurrection of Jesus is a historic event

@Asiyah2000

3 жыл бұрын

No it's not don't lie in our face 🤥😪

Paul and Jesus two opposite ideologies.

The response given by Dr. Tabor is rather philosophical and diverted from the main question raised by Paul... it’s simply unsatisfactory.

Hi Paul could you email me I have my work on crucifiction to send you for your opinion

Muslim and Christian claim that they both believe in Jesus. 🙏 *I CHALLENGE CHRISTIANS TO EXAMINE WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS).* 🙏

@erik_ery_erykind

3 жыл бұрын

*HOW TO KNOW WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS) ?* WE HAVE A GOOD WAY TO KNOW WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS)......AND THAT IS FROM “THE AUTHENTIC VERSES”……..THE VERSES THOSE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIMSELF OR FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES”. OFF COURSE, WE DON’T WANT UN-AUTHENTHIC VERSES !!! NOW LETS EXAMINE WHICH VERSES THOSE WERE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIMSELF OR AT LEAST FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES”. I DON'T SAY THAT ALL VERSES IN "NOWDAY NEW TESTAMENT" ARE 100% AUTHENTIC OR 100% FAKE. NOW, HOW TO KNOW WHICH VERSES THOSE WERE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIM SELF OR FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES” ? OFF COURSE, WE NEED TO VALIDATE WHICH VERSES WERE AUTHENTIC AND WHICH VERSES WERE NOT. THEN LETS VALIDATE EVERY SINGLE VERSE IF IT WAS AUTHENTIC OR NOT. TO VALIDATE EVERY SINGLE VERSE, WE NEED TO EXAMINE TWO THINGS : 1). THE SOURCES CHAIN 2). THE CONTENT LETS EXAMINE : 1). THE SOURCES CHAIN OF THE VERSE HAD TO BE CLEAR AND CREDIBLE. EVERY SINGLE MAN OF THE NARATORS MUST BE CLEAR AND CREDIBLE 2). THE CONTENT OF THE VERSE HAD TOBE VERIFICATIONABLE IF IT WAS GOOD, STRANGE, CONTRADICTIVE OR ANYTHING. NOW, LETS PICK ANY VERSE TO BE EXAMINED FIRST !!!

@erik_ery_erykind

3 жыл бұрын

@@ekkopoohbear9236 Muslim and Christian claim that they both believe in Jesus. 🙏 *I CHALLENGE CHRISTIANS TO EXAMINE WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS).* 🙏

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

@@erik_ery_erykind *WE CHALLENGE YOU TO EXAMINE WHAT JESUS REALLY TAUGHT YOU ABOUT MUHAMMED!*

@erik_ery_erykind

3 жыл бұрын

@@teachmetheway7081 Muslim and Christian claim that they both believe in Jesus. 🙏 *I CHALLENGE CHRISTIANS TO EXAMINE WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS).* 🙏 *HOW TO KNOW WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS) ?* WE HAVE A GOOD WAY TO KNOW WHAT JESUS ACTUALLY TAUGHT (THE AUTHENTIC TEACHINGS OF JESUS)......AND THAT IS FROM “THE AUTHENTIC VERSES”……..THE VERSES THOSE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIMSELF OR FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES”. OFF COURSE, WE DON’T WANT UN-AUTHENTHIC VERSES !!! NOW LETS EXAMINE WHICH VERSES THOSE WERE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIMSELF OR AT LEAST FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES”. I DON'T SAY THAT ALL VERSES IN "NOWDAY NEW TESTAMENT" ARE 100% AUTHENTIC OR 100% FAKE. NOW, HOW TO KNOW WHICH VERSES THOSE WERE AUTHENTIC FROM JESUS HIM SELF OR FROM “THE REAL DISCIPLES” ? OFF COURSE, WE NEED TO VALIDATE WHICH VERSES WERE AUTHENTIC AND WHICH VERSES WERE NOT. THEN LETS VALIDATE EVERY SINGLE VERSE IF IT WAS AUTHENTIC OR NOT. TO VALIDATE EVERY SINGLE VERSE, WE NEED TO EXAMINE TWO THINGS : 1). THE SOURCES CHAIN 2). THE CONTENT LETS EXAMINE : 1). THE SOURCES CHAIN OF THE VERSE HAD TO BE CLEAR AND CREDIBLE. EVERY SINGLE MAN OF THE NARATORS MUST BE CLEAR AND CREDIBLE 2). THE CONTENT OF THE VERSE HAD TOBE VERIFICATIONABLE IF IT WAS GOOD, STRANGE, CONTRADICTIVE OR ANYTHING. NOW, LETS PICK ANY VERSE TO BE EXAMINED FIRST !!!

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

@@erik_ery_erykind John 1:1 START

Prof. James seemingly offended by something somehow. what did you do, Paul?

@BloggingTheology

3 жыл бұрын

I didn't see that.

"During His ministry, Jesus had raised the dead to life. He had raised the son of the widow of Nain, and the ruler’s daughter and Lazarus. But these were not clothed with immortality. After they were raised, they were still subject to death. But those who came forth from the grave at Christ’s resurrection were raised to everlasting life. They ascended with Him as trophies of His victory over death and the grave. These, said Christ, are no longer the captives of Satan; I have redeemed them. I have brought them from the grave as the first fruits of My power, to be with Me where I am, nevermore to see death or experience sorrow. These went into the city, and appeared unto many, declaring, Christ has risen from the dead, and we be risen with Him. Thus was immortalized the sacred truth of the resurrection. The risen saints bore witness to the truth of the words, “Thy dead men shall live, together with My dead body shall they arise.” Their resurrection was an illustration of the fulfillment of the prophecy, “Awake and sing, ye that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast out the dead.” Isaiah 26:19. To the believer, Christ is the resurrection and the life. In our Saviour the life that was lost through sin is restored; for He has life in Himself to quicken whom He will. He is invested with the right to give immortality. The life that He laid down in humanity, He takes up again, and gives to humanity. “I am come,” He said, “that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.” “Whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.” “Whoso eateth My flesh, and drinketh My blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.” John 10:10; 4:14; John 6:54. { DA 786.4} To the believer, death is but a small matter. Christ speaks of it as if it were of little moment. “If a man keep My saying, he shall never see death,” “he shall never taste of death.” To the Christian, death is but a sleep, a moment of silence and darkness. The life is hid with Christ in God, and “when Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with Him in glory.” John 8:51, 52; Colossians 3:4."

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks for your thought-provoking statements.

@SundayBeastz

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 You are very welcome. Just spreading hope in a world lost in sin.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@SundayBeastz Yes... but many people don't see "hope" in Jesus. Are you familiar with Islam or Quran? I am not but what I hear on this channel is somewhat shocking. I mean, Islam and Christianity seem irreconcilable to me. Thanks again for your post. Have you studied the New Testament with any scholars?

@SundayBeastz

3 жыл бұрын

​@@johnbrzykcy3076 Yes, I am familiar with many of the doctrines of Islam. Islam is opposed and even very hostile to Christian doctrine at every level. According to Muslims the Holy Bible is flat out corrupt, They deny the resurrection of Christ, They deny that Jesus died on the cross. They claim it was Judas or some other person that was crucified. They claim that they Holy Spirit is Gabriel. They claim that Mohammad was the most perfect person that ever lived . . . this anti-Christian stuff goes on and on to the point of ad nauseum. No, I do not study with scholars. I just study the Holy Bible and do my own research. In fact I reject most scholars. The opinions of scholars often contradict each other. Only the Holy Bible is the Truth. I study and accept only the Textus Receptus as the Word of God.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@Malcolm X Hey Malcolm.... I'm a Christian and always "learning." Hahahaa I don't think there is any "expert" except Jesus Himself... if I can state it in such a way. Hmmm... you had to ask such a difficult question huh? What Jesus said about his body and blood is debated in many ways. I see it as a metaphor that points to a spiritual truth. Maybe Jesus "body" and "blood" can be taken literally but in a spiritual way? Oooops... that don't make any sense, does it? I mean we have to "ingest" Jesus "body" and "blood" in a spiritual ( faith or trusting ) way whereby His spirit becomes part of us. I think God always wanted His Spirit to live in us, His creation. But sin drives God's spirit away from us. Do I make any sense? I'm no scholar. Only God can open our eyes to see.....

Stealing the graveyard is also possible .

These yoytube channels are really good if you want to learn about islam: "CIRA International" and "pfanderfilms". :) I can recommend "The resurrection of Jesus: A new historiographical approach" by Mike Licona and "Evidence demands a verdict" by Josh McDowell. :)

What is the proof that Paul didn't lie? Circular reasoning? So much of Christianity is conjecture. Compare with the evidence for hadiths which gives you certainty about what actually happened to a high degree. Supposition versus certainty

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

I kind of disagree with you although I know nothing about the Quran or the "hadiths." Why are the hadiths more certain than the New Testament? I'm just curious as to your presupposition regarding hadiths. I respect Islam. Yes a lot of Christianity seems to be "conjecture", but I think the core or cornerstone of Christian beliefs are supported by Ancient Near East oral culture, manuscripts and reasoning. John

@thinkislamcheckmychannel

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 Hi John. I say that from a position of honesty not faith because it's so easy for faith to cloud judgement. The method of the hadith and quran transmission is jaw dropping and unique. It provides a form of transmission and preservation that easily surpasses that of manuscripts. If you contrast with Christianity for a minute you will find the following 1. No known authors 2. No original manuscripts (known as the autographs) 3. No early manuscripts. The earliest may have been from around 125 and is a credit card sized scrap of a manuscript. Etc etc. So why are the hadiths different? surely oral transmission is far inferior to a written record right? We all know what happens in the game of Chinese whispers or Telephone. The message degrades and may be totally changed by the end of the chain. And hadiths were compiled over 200 years later so surely they are totally unreliable by then especially with very few manuscripts? This may be counterintuitive but that is wrong. There are some very important aspects of hadiths besides the message. There in what is known as the isnad ie a list of every person in the chains. Chains can be complete or incomplete. Then there has to be a biography of every person in the chain with knowledge about whether they were honest, moral, of good memory etc. Hadiths are also classified according to how many there are that say the same and the strengths of the chains etc. If a hadith has perfect chains with trustworthy transmitters and it has multiple independent chains with the ends being identical or virtually identical then the level of evidence is high and it is called mutawatir ie generally accepted. Imagine you have a game of Chinese whispers over 200 years with chains spanning many generations and communities spread from medina all the way to Egypt, Spain, and India. If the last person has the same message at the end of each chain, the only logical possibility is some form of miracle whereby any errors along the way miraculously developed errors so that they reverted to the original by the end of each chain, or that the preservation was perfect. Now with the transmission of the quran this transmission was perfect for various reasons : the quran is memorised perfectly by many and continuously revised. It is read in entirety in almost every mosque in Ramadan by the imam and other memorisers in the congregation will be listening closely ready to correct the slightest error. Hadiths are more varied. Some are extremely well preserved. Some are very well preserved and called Saheeh (which means good) eg the famous collections of Saheeh Bukhari ad Saheeh Muslim which are the source for most of the reliable hadith. Then you have various categories including daeef (which means weak, where there may be a few narrations only, or incomplete chains, or someone thought to be unreliable in the chain etc) and then there are fake hadiths. The entire process is preserved perfectly such that the evidence is there for anyone to see the evidence for themselves. There is no supposition or indirect evidence. For example in Christianity, a lot of the evidence comes from hearsay eg the writings of others like Justin Martyr or others, ie just the opinion of one person who wrote an account of history. (the manuscript evidence for these early writings is again another major problem) and as you are intelligent you will know that we are all biased in everything we write. The difference with hadiths is that it is the preservation of raw data. It doesn't whitewash the facts. It preserved favourable and unfavourable information which is why cryptically have such a lot of ammo. Hadiths are preserved even when they were thought to be fake or propaganda as some collectors of their hadiths saw their role as archivist not as students or experts of the hadiths. I look forward to your comments/questions. Regards

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@thinkislamcheckmychannel Wow... thanks for the information and I appreciate your time. I like your statement "it is so easy for faith to cloud judgement". Do you mean cloud our reasoning about things? That is interesting and actually I think you are correct. However.. .the way I look at it, faith should not cloud judgement but built it up. I mean faith should be able to make reasoning easier. I agree with your points 1, 2 and 3. However we must remember that unlike Quran ( I'm assuming), the New Testament was first written on papyrus which usually only last a few decades. However we do have other manuscripts from early Christians who wrote about the New Testament. Can you explain more about "isnad"? I don't quite understand what you mean by it and "chains"? Peace from Florida

@thinkislamcheckmychannel

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 Thanks John The manuscript evidence for early Christianity is very sparse from what I gather. The oldest bit of a manuscript is P52 which has a few verses of John and is about the size of a credit card. It used to be dated to between 100 to 150 but new studies suggest it may be closer to 200. Yes the earlier church fathers made quotes from the NT but do we have any early manuscript evidence for their writings? Isnad just means a chain. So if you consider the game of Chinese whispers, the people in the chain are the isnad. And the chains can be intact if you the identity of everyone in it is recorded or broken if not.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@thinkislamcheckmychannel The idea of "chains" is interesting. I think a Christian scholar has written about a chain for Christianity with the early followers of Christ but I'm not sure how accurate it is. I think many early New Testament manuscripts were destroyed in the fire at the "library" in Alexandria, Egypt. Have you heard about that library and fire?

First question should have beed was Jesus was crucified... Blogging theology Paul.... Is intelligent to ask only selected question

Reincarnation is real and taught from Egypt and other societies. Jesus said that he was a man like you and me. He also warned us about the Scribes and Pharisees deceiving the sheep and removing information from the Bible.

Alot of maybe and probablies

Did Jesus claim to be God? Did his mother call him God? Did James call him God? Did the disciples call him God? Did the apostles call him God? Well who made him God? Not even Paul called him God!! It's the false gospel John that last gospel exalted him to God yet John 17:3 contradicts itself

Jesus created Heaven?.. So Jesus had to remove a stone that man boxed him into to go to the Heaven he created?

Most likely the original narrative is the physical reappearance because the spiritual reappearance is wrong as it is derived from Paul's imagination. The physical reappearance in the gospel having jesus ate fish is consistent with the report that the true Jesus was not crucifiey, only the false Jesus was crucified whose body was stolen by curious disciples.

Do you understand the real historical Jesus, begin with the Shroud of Turin.

Very meandering and confusing. These things need outlines that participants follow. Even the opening question by the moderator is long winded and confused.

crucifiction attempt on Jesus to remove laws will make his ppl lose blessings in mathew 21 :43 & jeremia 31 :36. pauls in acts 9 : 3 saw devil of luke 10 :18 went to Arabia, is lawless false prophet in mathew 24 :11 thought he's who will correct him - comforter in John 1 :21 & 16 :8, Prophet law giver like Musa is Muhammad peace and blessings on him! Jesus is only sent to his tribe, after mark 16 : 8 Jesus's 2nd appearance saying he's sent for the world is an admitted fabrication. isaiah 49 says Jesus will leave his tribe and return following the light of nations of isaiah 42, a new covenent, from the Arab Prophet from mt selah Medina, this is clearly Islam. Abraham wasn't from juda, juda came like 2 centuries later, Ibrahim and Ismael were Muslims who built the Kaba, even Jacob imitates the hajj in genesis 28!

*'IN HIS (JESUS)MOST CRITICAL MOMENT OF HIS LIFETIME,'ALL HIS DISCIPLES FORSOOK AND FLED'* *NO EYE WITNESS ACCOUNT,ONLY HEARSAY* IN SHORT CHRISTIANS HAVE NOTHING TO RELY THEIR FAITH ON.. JESUS NEVER PREACHED TRINITY NEITHER CLAIM TO BE GOD NOR SAYS HIS A CHRISTIAN. CHRISTIANITY:- BASE ON BLIND & FICTION BELIEFS. MAN MADE PAGANISM CULTURE!

@SundayBeastz

3 жыл бұрын

Dream on loverboy arshad . . . That's a very nice opinion but we all know what opinions are worth.

@fikarrusdiawan9562

3 жыл бұрын

@@SundayBeastz nope, not opinions...

@justarshad8354

3 жыл бұрын

@@SundayBeastz true words are known as facts! 🔫

@SundayBeastz

3 жыл бұрын

​@@justarshad8354 Me dear loverboy arshad, You live in the Twilight Zone if you think ANYONE will read all that copy and paste NONSENSE and actually believe it.

@SundayBeastz

3 жыл бұрын

@Lilia murah Me dear Lilia mrah, You live in the Twilight Zone if you think ANYONE will read all that copy and paste NONSENSE and actually believe it.

Paul the apostate Jew the hater of the Law who killed Christians and was a self proclaimed thief and said he was beaten by Satan and Jesus chose him for a vision? Wow.

"What really happened" is a mystery, although the resurrection of Jesus is the cornerstone of Christian belief supported by manuscripts, the Ancient Near Eastern oral culture. and reasoning.

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

@@tonydimera282 Really? I wonder why this scholar said that? I think I agree with you because the concepts of Jesus death and resurrection COME from the Bible. So if the Bible is accepted as "corrupt", how can anyone hold the beliefs regarding Jesus?

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 Via personal experience with Jesus in the way of vision etc.,

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 .05% impurity in water makes the water impure. Yet we drink it. How do we rationalize that? One should have no fear in my opinion of the biblical text being "corrupt" as long as such an one has greater than the text in their life- the Holy Spirit. It puts a spin on the contended verse in Mark "these signs shall follow them that believe....and if they drink any poisonous thing it shall not hurt them"

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

​@@johnbrzykcy3076 But we are called not to lie, not even about the Scriptures. If there are "issues" then let us not say otherwise. By creed we accept scripture as infallible and inerrant. And I believe this whole heartedly. If we stay true to the scriptural prescription- holy men of old spoke by the will of God AND all scripture is given by inspiration of God. However, this doesn't speak necessarily to transmission throughout those years. We trust that these honest scribes would have done their best and we have sufficient proof in the dead sea scrolls for this. Or what about the unfortunate incident of the commandment being "THOU SHALT COMMIT ADULTERY!" which occurred in the early centuries of the printing press. These Bibles for the most part were destroyed but some remained. never could it be said that the intention of the original author was to permit adultery since every other scripture spoke the opposite. Holy men of old spoke as led by God; and scripture by inspiration of God was thereof written. Muslims need to learn from us. Their mantras of perfect preservation are lies. Their mantra of that book of theirs being from God Almighty is a lie. No God needs to plagiarize other extant texts to write such a simple book. And no God writes as is said ""To sum up, more than one hundred Qor'anic aberrations from the normal rules and structure of Arabic have been noted. Needless to say, the commentators strove to find explanations and justifications of these irregularities..." And yet another "The Qor'an contains sentences which are incomplete and not fully intelligible without the aid of commentaries; foreign words, unfamiliar Arabic words, and words used with other than the normal meaning; adjectives and verbs inflected without observance of the concords of gender and number; illogically and ungrammatically applied pronouns which sometimes have no referent; and predicates which in rhymed passages are often remote from the subjects. These and other such aberrations in the language have given scope to critics who deny the Qor'an's eloquence. The problem also occupied the minds of devout Moslems. It forced the commentators to search for explanations and was probably one of the causes of disagreement over readings." and yet another "A wearisome confused jumble, crude, incondite, endless iterations, longwindedness, entanglement; most crude incondite-insupportable STUPIDITY, in short! Nothing but a sense of duty could carry any European through the Koran." (Carlyle, Sartor Resartus: On Heroes and Hero Worship [London, 1973], p. 299) "His Koran has become a STUPID piece of prolix absurdity; we do not believe, like him, that God wrote that!" I rest my case!

@teachmetheway7081

3 жыл бұрын

@@qasimmirrani1746 Rude? How so? not clear

I have tried to follow your arguments but it's just more of the same. This is a bloody waste of time. I give up.

Is he doing the coffin dance..

@fikarrusdiawan9562

3 жыл бұрын

😅

72. Surely, they have disbelieved who say: ''Allah is the Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)], son of Maryam (Mary).'' But the Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)] said: ''O Children of Israel! Worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.'' Verily, whosoever sets up partners in worship with Allah, then Allah has forbidden Paradise for him, and the Fire will be his abode. And for the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers) there are no helpers. 73. Surely, disbelievers are those who said: ''Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity).'' But there is no ilah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them. 74. Will they not repent to Allah and ask His Forgiveness? For Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. 75. The Messiah ['Iesa (Jesus)], son of Maryam (Mary), was no more than a Messenger; many were the Messengers that passed away before him. His mother [Maryam (Mary)] was a Siddiqah [i.e. she believed in the words of Allah and His Books (see Verse 66:12)]. They both used to eat food (as any other human being, while Allah does not eat). Look how We make the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to them, yet look how they are deluded away (from the truth). 76. Say (O Muhammad SAW to mankind): ''How do you worship besides Allah something which has no power either to harm or to benefit you? But it is Allah Who is the All-Hearer, All-Knower.'' 77. Say (O Muhammad SAW): ''O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Exceed not the limits in your religion (by believing in something) other than the truth, and do not follow the vain desires of people who went astray in times gone by, and who misled many, and strayed (themselves) from the Right Path.'' Al-Maidah | Qur'ān Chapter 5 verses 72-77 Interpretation of the meanings of the noble quran By - Muhsin Khan & Taqi-'ud-Din in English

@jeanclaudepierrot2971

2 жыл бұрын

What else did Jesus teach? " For God so loved the world that he gave his Only Begotten Son so whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal Life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn it but that the world might be saved through him'. John 3:16-17. Jesus said," I am the Way the Truth and the life, No one comes to the Father but through me". John 14:6. Jesus said," He that honoreth not the Son honoreth not the Father who sent him" John 5:23. Jesus said," I and the Father are One". John 10:30. Jesus told Philip, " If you see me you see the Father. For I am in the Father and the Father is in me". John 14:9. Jesus said," Truly, truly, I tell you, Before Abraham was born I am". John 8:58 Praise be Jesus Christ the Only Son of Almighty God!

SAUL LIED ABOUT SEEING JESUS!

@koppite9600

3 жыл бұрын

But Paul of Tarsus is a good man even in the Quran 😂 You can investigate the bible all day but nowhere does it hint that Mohamed will come.

@jeanclaudepierrot2971

2 жыл бұрын

Really? And he spread Christianity throughout the Ancient world and later was beheaded in Rome , and he was a liar?

Can't stop posting about Christianity but is terrified to actually speak to Christians in Hyde park 🤣

@johnbrzykcy3076

3 жыл бұрын

Who are you referring to?

@marlo8456

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbrzykcy3076 who's post am I commenting on?

@Asiyah2000

3 жыл бұрын

@@marlo8456 terrified??? You dumb your head 🥴😅😅

@marlo8456

3 жыл бұрын

@@Asiyah2000 you must be blind as well as illiterate

Peace be with u brother paul. Eid mubarak. may allah give u health and long life inshallah. For us muslims u r a light that shines to give the sight for everyone who seek the truth about the true religion of god and the reality of who was the real jesus. Thank u so much from Algeria.

It is interesting how very central to Christianity Paul is. Very.