Oh My Goalers, all of you make up OUR Golden Generation. The only difference? One of you wins our Comment of the Week game EVERY WEEK! Make sure to comment on all of our videos and community posts for your chance to be featured in one of our weekly videos!

@yaboisp0796

4 жыл бұрын

1

@thebluepython7400

4 жыл бұрын

Oh My Goal AT LEAST I AM THE FIRST COMMENT

@dihamantemakeup8074

4 жыл бұрын

2 do face reaveal

@s10f37

4 жыл бұрын

Oh My Goal ur the best

@thebluepython7400

4 жыл бұрын

Yaboisp 07 no it was me

When your team is 100 overall and have 0 chemistry

@Liam-jy7yi

4 жыл бұрын

Genius

@soccerstoriesohmygoal

4 жыл бұрын

True 👍

@f7g249

4 жыл бұрын

@@soccerstoriesohmygoal hi

@adityakshirsagar6059

4 жыл бұрын

And domestic rivelty overcome national love

@soyUsernameWasTaken

4 жыл бұрын

I call bullshit. England national team exist way before the golden generation. English club rivalries was even worse in the past. Even if there are problems, it never stopped them. They simply unlucky, ricardo was too good, and erikson was stupid for forcing gerrard and lampard together when he should've played carrick with just one of them. Also, their goalie shite. Seaman retired really early omgoal shouldn't bother putting his name, and put terry alongside ferdinand instead.

5 to 10 years later...there will be a video called 'Why Belgium's golden generation never won anything'

@rorybellows7621

2 жыл бұрын

Yup, just ask the Dutch.

@carlosdeschouwer8833

2 жыл бұрын

As a Belgian, i agree with that.

@jontheo6794

2 жыл бұрын

Atleast they reached a semifinal

@juanjuan7349

2 жыл бұрын

@@jontheo6794 and ended with a medal! Inglish players after losing the final were taking off theirs silver medals!! Do they know it's the first one they got since 66'?

@Monada79

2 жыл бұрын

@@juanjuan7349 they stole their only world Cup.

Easy, Brazil, Italy, France and Spain were also at their peak.

@DuriNani257

3 жыл бұрын

But england lost to portugal 🤷🏻‍♂️

@nikolaandonovski3735

3 жыл бұрын

@@DuriNani257 Portugal had the core of the Porto team that won the 2004 Champions League + Luis Figo + Rui Costa AND a blossoming Cristiano Ronaldo. Moreover, they packed the midfield in an attempt to control the possession and tempo. With all of that, they only won on penalties twice. So, it's not as if it's a huge England failure. That England team may be the best the country has had, but they were NOT internationally dominant.

@Rzn1048

2 жыл бұрын

But better than overrated England

@glazersout4272

2 жыл бұрын

@@DuriNani257 2004 v Portugal, no one could deal with Rooney. If he hadn't been injured, it's very unlikely they would've won. 2006 v Portugal, Sol Campbell scored a perfectly good goal that was disallowed. If it had stood, there would've been no penalties to lose 😄

@myduck9962

2 жыл бұрын

This is true but England should have at least got to the final in those 8 years

Kane and Sterling led England to Finals. At least they broke the 55 years old streak. They played well

@notlike706

2 жыл бұрын

Sadly they will probably get another chance again, They didn't have to face france/portugal/spain etc. and they were playing at Wembley, its a shame but they did so well to get to the final.

@sumansatan1669

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks to that dive by Sterling.

@LFCxYNWA

2 жыл бұрын

Don't worry . Sterling will win the diving competition in the upcoming Olympics.

@gauravmishra1428

2 жыл бұрын

@@LFCxYNWA 😁

@elvangaringgin

2 жыл бұрын

@@notlike706 well england won over germany, don’t forget that.

If that generation was overrated then what do you call this "It's coming home" generation 😂😂

@anirudhsai8483

4 жыл бұрын

Modric: HOLD MY BALON'DOR 😭😭🤣

@ns307

4 жыл бұрын

@Arson Raut Not as overrated as Messi's Argentina lmao

@anirudhsai8483

4 жыл бұрын

@@ns307 🔥🔥🔥🔥 Team Which Prefers Higuain Over Icardi😂😂

@soccerstoriesohmygoal

4 жыл бұрын

ahahahaha nice one 😂😂

@francescobuadu8912

4 жыл бұрын

@@anirudhsai8483 do you even know Icardi

Put some respect on Michael Carrick's name. He's a legend.

@arifogunawan

4 жыл бұрын

Really great defensive midfielder tbh. I think this video is really absurd on that

@nabell2032

4 жыл бұрын

yeah

@slamm674

4 жыл бұрын

Mayank Thakur I’m a legend but they didn’t mention me

@everythingisamindgame9666

4 жыл бұрын

He's arguably the best technical footballer England had other then Scholes both of them plated together at manu obviously won the ucl in 2008 so yea really disrespectful indeed.

@manolotejeda8209

4 жыл бұрын

they were comparing him to Kante, Sweinsteiger, Khedira, and Busquets; in that conversation he's definitely outmatched

Carrick being dissed lol He's one of the most talented and versatile metronome in the heart of the midfield. Even the likes of Inesta, Xavi, Pirlo, Zidane etc. acknowledged his gameplay. Respect man

Michael Carrick was underrated because he was never the typical english/ premier league midfielder. He was calm composed solid in attack and defense. I don’t think England are ever gonna have a player like Carrick again he’s probably the only “Regista” England ever had. I mean you’ll find an attacking midfielder like Lampard, a box to box midfielder like Gerrard or Scholes in near future but never a deep lying playmaking defensive midfielder like Michael Carrick. If he was of some other nationality preferably Spanish or French..his story would’ve been very different. I still believe the reason why this “golden generation” underachieved was due to the fact that they always overlooked a player like Carrick who stabilises the entire midfield and defence( something which Busquets, Kanté, Casemiro, Fernandinho do for their teams).

@tcsl7764

Жыл бұрын

David Batty was that type of player and he was brilliant. The English media hated him.

Not gonna lie, but the 2000's were the golden generation of football

@mmehdi3437

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly !

@sponish0

4 жыл бұрын

M Mehdi that’s because you were a kid then, people tend to think of their childhood memories as the golden times because things seems more magical and exciting as a child, when you grow up you become more cynical and start to notice the bad sides.

@mmehdi3437

4 жыл бұрын

@@sponish0 i agree ! nobody can replace our childhood heroes, mine was oliver kahn :)

@dgxkeyboards4535

4 жыл бұрын

@@sponish0 No the 2000s had more legends than nowadays and that is a fact. Brazil had ronaldo, ronaldinho, cafu, rivaldo, roberto carlos, lucio, Kaka, Dida. Italy had Del Piero, Totti, Pirlo, Gattuso, Buffon, Cannavarro, Maldini, Nesta. Frace had Zidane, Henry, Trezeguet, Vieira, Makalele, Thuram. Spain had Villa, Casillas, Xavi, Xabi Alonso, Puyol, Raul, Torres, Iniesta, Guti. Netherlands had Van Nistelrooy, Bergkamp, Davids, Van Bronkhorst, Robben. England had Beckham, Gerrard, Rooney, Lampard, Scholes, Ferdinand. Portugal had Figo, deco, and young C.R7.

@OppaHan

4 жыл бұрын

@@dgxkeyboards4535 true dat

Simple, There was never balance in the line up. The line up was more of who's more famous instead of who's better.

@krittikdas4968

3 жыл бұрын

Truth has been spoken

@englishsurvivalguide7482

2 жыл бұрын

Truer words were never said.

Javier Hernández said playing alongside Carrick that he was one of the most underrated footballers ever and here you are disrespecting him. Smh 🤦‍♂️

@aye2you

3 жыл бұрын

So you're saying carrick was the same level as prime busquest? Lol

@juanbernalo5

2 жыл бұрын

Es increíble ver como le faltan el respeto a un jugador como carrick

@ritamchatterjee9379

2 жыл бұрын

@@aye2you No one should be saying that...but Carrick was a brilliant cdm who definitely could have done the job....its not about comparing two players but the video has literally shamed carrick without watching him play

@MrKAKARONALDOMESSI

2 жыл бұрын

@@aye2you Sergio Busquest haven't won an Oscar yet

Other teams were better than them. Brazil Italy Spain France All had more legends than them

@everythingisamindgame9666

4 жыл бұрын

Don't forget Germany

@24superisaac

4 жыл бұрын

And portugal

@nima665

4 жыл бұрын

yeah! it's just the English media hype!

@manolotejeda8209

4 жыл бұрын

fun fact: Ronaldo and Ronaldinho, Pirlo and Buffon, Xavi and Iniesta, Zidane and Henri all won World Cups

@jeandej5129

4 жыл бұрын

Dont forget the netherlands ;-)

Tottenham:We’ve never won anything. England:Hold my beer

@aimandhakim

4 жыл бұрын

world cup 1966*

@HG-ql2sz

4 жыл бұрын

@@aimandhakim it doesn't count cuz Germany got robbed.

@aimandhakim

4 жыл бұрын

@@HG-ql2sz robbed or not, they won that's it

@prahaladhvijay9731

4 жыл бұрын

@@aimandhakim 2002-2010 means ??

@Daamin31

4 жыл бұрын

World. Cup

Even Lampard says England should have played with Carrick - so much disrespect

@Forestgravy90

4 жыл бұрын

Once Hargreaves had his injuries then yes, much better all round footballer than Barry or Parker

@TeamMagicLifeOfficial

2 жыл бұрын

Wouldnt help

Because other teams had golden generations too.

@jagmaharesi2486

2 жыл бұрын

if england had their "golden" generation, then other teams had their "platinum" generation back then

@vaestkusten6041

2 жыл бұрын

@@jagmaharesi2486 Exactly, sure they were good players individually.. but maybe its just me, but they never mashed well during that entire "golden" era

@jagmaharesi2486

2 жыл бұрын

@@vaestkusten6041 they never mashed well is one of the main reason why they didn't get anywhere far.

When your team spirit is 0 in pes

@fulliconteam9373

3 жыл бұрын

Just like 0 chemistry in fifa

@mamtachatterjee9948

3 жыл бұрын

Play hard to increase familiarity lol xd

Commators voice tone sounded like Michael Carrick was trash when he was incredibly underrated Americans no nothing about this sport

@soccerstoriesohmygoal

4 жыл бұрын

He is a legend ❤

@rishis1536

4 жыл бұрын

@@soccerstoriesohmygoal 😂

@riteshdayal3337

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly the man’s won every trophy there is to win in the English top flight and you can’t say he wasn’t an important cog in those United teams

@mmehdi3437

4 жыл бұрын

Fergie made him look so good, otherwise he was not on the same level as the golden generation

@sudhanshuranjan6817

4 жыл бұрын

True

Show some respect to Carrick, he literally won everything at Club Level. .

@ismaeladen2582

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah with Ronaldo and Van Perdue carrying him lol

@jackdelacey7392

2 жыл бұрын

@@ismaeladen2582 watch clips of Carrick before you criticise

@juanbernalo5

2 жыл бұрын

Es indignante ver como le faltan el respeto a un jugador como Carrick. Creen que saben de fútbol por decir cualquier insensatez

@NinpoUK

2 жыл бұрын

Came here to say this and Sven was to blame, you could've made a great midfield 3 from three of Scholes/Lampard/Carrick/Gerrard and later Hargreaves.

@ghjklkop7868

2 жыл бұрын

@@jackdelacey7392 clips dont really show how good anyone is

Because they aren't in unity as they carried along with the feeling of their clubs' rivalry even in international matches.

Its funny how whenever the talked about media it went on beckham

Cause is an English team. If they aren’t good the media will still hype them.

@eavyeavy2864

4 жыл бұрын

You dont even watch the video asshat

@Mwestside010

4 жыл бұрын

@@eavyeavy2864 Lmao salty english gay ass fanboy😂

@karlconstantine8539

4 жыл бұрын

@@Mwestside010 Are you stupid?

@TToTToTT

4 жыл бұрын

ouch thats very true...

@kritav1111

4 жыл бұрын

@@eavyeavy2864 Why watch the video, when you can be a moron without wasting the 5 minutes on the video

What wrong with Carrick, he's a manutd legend he's a world class midfielder. He control the game from a deep lying midfield position he can see passes and create chances only few can emulate. Ur channel should properly check the stature and achievement of the man.

@salsadancer4965

4 жыл бұрын

The problem is England never respected Carrick because they could not appreciate his capabilities to their detriment. Gerrard and Lampard were good but not great

@salsadancer4965

4 жыл бұрын

@Faizan Manzoor Gerrard won 11 titles no premier league included lampard won 14 titles 3 epl Carrick won 18 titles 5 epl not too bad for a 4/10 holding midfielder. And neither lampard nor Gerard won anything for England best they gave Carrick a try.

@casterbuahbuahanhanyabisam6610

3 жыл бұрын

Lol watch again he compare with kante and basque (spain), carrick far far away to their prime level

@ugochukwumunachisoiwunze2597

3 жыл бұрын

Michael Carrick is not a Legend I think you youngsters these days use that word Legend so Loosely if you followed his career he ain't no Legend. However he played alongside Legends so he will naturally look better than he actually is.

@diwasthapa5904

3 жыл бұрын

@@ugochukwumunachisoiwunze2597 or those legends you called played alongside the legend so they looked like legends

Just look at spain, the spanish players are rivals for the total year, but when it come to national team, they play like Brothers

@JudgeHolden

2 жыл бұрын

exactly!

@cicciom9622

2 жыл бұрын

Also Italy

@donbor734

2 жыл бұрын

Pique n raMos

@72007www

2 жыл бұрын

Overrated players because of foreign players they won at club level. Recent true golden generation is of Spain: 2008-2012, Italy: 1990-2006(eventually won something at 2006, but played couple of finals before and were eliminated only at penalties) , Germany(2002-2016), France:(1998-2006 and then 2014-present), Brazil:(1994-2002), Argentina: emerging. Even Portugal Golden generation played finals and eventually won something. English media, marketing, PR teams created such hypes for average celebrity type players who look good only with the support of foreign players. Their main Stricker scored only 1 goal in 3 world cup says a lot, how good they are and how much media feed fake hypes to viewers. It's like selling fake product in original packaging. Same with Belgium at-least they play good, whereas England golden generation didn't even done that. The most unluckiest golden generations are of Holland and Uruguay. England footballing are not there yet and not part of elite group of players. England playing their first final in Euro says a lot about them. Given Euro is the most open tournament where teams like Greece, Denmark were also champions.

@72007www

2 жыл бұрын

@@capilah6285 they might be good or above average, but media hype says something else. I have never seen Gerrad, Lampard, Scholes Beckham(apart from freekick against Greece), Rooney etc did anything special or good for national team, they got exposed totally against good teams. and all of them played at-least 3 world cups and same number of euros.

Stop blaming 4-4-2. Simeone and Ranieri won league titles in the 2010s using 4-4-2. What you people don't seem to understand is that the decline of 4-4-2 since the mid-2000s is bad for football. In most cases, you don't get an attacking Barcelona-style 4-3-3 as a replacement, but a boring 4-2-3-1 leading to endless midfield battles and fewer goals.

@sokukenable

3 жыл бұрын

Its not the 442, its the players didn't fit a stereotype 442. 442 needs strong wingers on both sides, England only had 1 side, so they forced one of their strong CM on flank. Aside from Rooney, there aren't another English striker that can operate as lone striker in 4231 system, so the logical choice was either 433 or a 442 diamond to fully utilize their FBs. There were many problems to those England squad, but the biggest was lack of management whether tactically or characteristically.

Man, seeing this team underperform through the years was so heartbreaking due to the talent and charm that most of these guys had

@dzassault

4 жыл бұрын

I agree, seeing it fail the first time was okay since we would at least come out knowing it’s not realistic. But they kept on persisting with that notion for a decade. The result? A failure. Should have quickly broke the team down and build it from the bottom again after noticing it’s deficiency.

@martymart6143

3 жыл бұрын

Talent definitely not sure about the charm. Seeing Rooney consistently underperform and blane the fans wasn't great

@DarkForcesStudio

Жыл бұрын

Charm? They all looked like egotistical bellends to me. Small minded twats.

I’m sorry but you forgot to mention there was no keeper for that generation

@banger2998

4 жыл бұрын

Seaman was good I mean the problems didn't lay in the goalkeeper at all

@phillbozz853

4 жыл бұрын

The had keepers

@homersimpson6585

4 жыл бұрын

HenReviews seamen was good but he was old Later on they had Paul robinson who was good at one point I think he got injured

@supersbbrawl4ever

4 жыл бұрын

Seaman was already 39 in 2002.

@nongsiejaibor5572

4 жыл бұрын

What about the manager

When You SELECT a TEAM By Their POPULAR and CELEBRITY STATUS not by LOGIC.

How the hell could you say sth disrespectful on M.Carrick That's unbelievable and unacceptable

Growing up watching EPL’s heroes in one Team(England) and seeing them lose Quarter finals again and again was just painful to watch.

England: You know, we had the better team and the best players from the best league, a golden generation of superior players who were bound to win everything. The only reason why it failed is because the english players were individually soooooo good and soooooo much more talented that they couldn't get along and actually refused to play together as a football team, true story. All the while the mediocre players from the french and brazilians teams had no other choice than to play collectively, because that was the only way they could ever hope to beat the one and only true golden generation of football players. We were definitely the superior team despite not winning anything and being repeatedly beaten by the best teams of the era, there is no question about that. The World: Right.

@siam580

4 жыл бұрын

Brazil and France was filled with world class at that moment.

@RealMadridfansince

4 жыл бұрын

@@siam580 don't be serious bro he is a just joking

@notverybright9825

3 жыл бұрын

Honestly, Beckham, Gerrard, Lampard and Ferdinand are some of the most overated and overhyped pr marketing stunt I've ever seen. Golden generation my ass, the only world class player in England at that period were Scholes, Rooney and Terry.

@MrJoe6667

3 жыл бұрын

DarkBerserker Gaming they weren’t overrated. All 6 were top class players. It’s just they couldn’t perform well for their country.

@PierrotHG

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrJoe6667 It's not the national service, it's a football team. And other teams around the same time had better players and played better football, I don't know why it is so difficult to understand.

How can you disrespect carrick like that?

What's wrong with Carrick he's won everything with Man Utd..the guy made fun of him was a total bastard..

@erde9790

4 жыл бұрын

This bro was sarcasing.

@xaviardebbarma2430

3 жыл бұрын

What about international game...nothing won

@hari2300

3 жыл бұрын

@@xaviardebbarma2430 so what

@xaviardebbarma2430

2 жыл бұрын

@@hari2300 nothing...but again in the end he won nothing in international game

@AzizDoufikar2280

Жыл бұрын

@@hari2300 Nothing at international.That's the reason he was trashing Carrick.Tbh I'd say the same thing too

To many EGOS in one team

In 2002 I think was the best chance to England win a WC, but they played against Brazil with Cafu, R.Carlos, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho and Ronaldo, cmon man there's no win against that brazilian team in 2002.

More like the strawberry generation,..good looking, but doesn’t stand pressure ⚽️

@captain2ahab

2 жыл бұрын

brilliant !

They finally made the positioning normal. I can watch the video and read comments.😂😂😂

The whole decade from 2000 to 2010 was full of legendary players playing at a legendary level.

@supersbbrawl4ever

4 жыл бұрын

I don't care what anyone says, 2000-10 was when football peaked in terms of individual talent.

@fightingforce8498

4 жыл бұрын

0 wins... they were bollocks.... didn't even qualify for euro 2008...lol

@MrJondinham

4 жыл бұрын

@@supersbbrawl4ever You mean in English players? I disagree with that. The prem was not the best league in the world back then. So they looked better playing at a lesser standard than what these English players play in now. They were mainly overrated apart from Ashley Cole who was always superb at any level. Gerrard and Lampard could not string two passes together in that England side. Beckham was very good but was injured going into tournament and should not have even been there. England never had a great goalkeeper. David James? Robinson? Average. Rooney was just 18 going into those Euros and people thought he was the answer. He did have a great game against Croatia. Was a bit of a handful against France but you can't rely on an 18 year old to win tournaments. He was very raw. Owen was already a shadow of his former self. Scholes, the best technical midfielder we had at the time was played on the left wing when we were crying out for him in the middle. Owen Hargreaves a regular for Bayarn didn't get much of a look in because I guess he wasn't hyped. And throughout those years we had a top top midfielder in Carrick that barely got a game! Ridiculous.

@supersbbrawl4ever

4 жыл бұрын

@@MrJondinham In general, not in England.

@regiment589

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrJondinham Scholes played mainly as CM -1998, 2000, 2002. He constantly underperformed, couldnt master the midfield, the most overrated played of this so called golden generation. Owen was world class even in 2004- goal vs Portugal and couple of assists.

England has the complete squad as Milan from back on those days, the 4-4-2 should work for them the way Milan does: Midfield: Kaka-Pirlo-Gattuso-Seedorf Forward: Sheva-Crespo/Inzaghi The same does to England Midfield: Beckham-Gerrard-Lampard-Scholes Forward: Ronney-Owen The thing is the England football is never put a tactical programs into a whole different level and adjusted it to top level the way Italy do, just see how their clubs went into big stage for the last 20 years under non-england manager, Mourinho/Ancelotti/DiMatteo/Rafa/Etc come there and made a big difference. The another problem is yes they're kick and rush and they might explosive, but they're not as explosive as Brazil. And they didn't has someone like Zidane if they wanted to relay on one player. Chelsea on winning the 2012 CL considered a boring journey by many fans, but that's what tactics does for your team, you win titles. The same way how Liverpool play the 2019 final Vs Tottenham they weren't as explosive as their other matches they played but it was more about tactical and Klopp does the right thing to win that CL title. You just don't need a great defender to defending but you need a great defender who knows tactical and technical abilities to defend just like Maldini and Baresi. Cannavaro displayed this superiority of defending on the WC 2006.

I actually like the "too much rivalry between the clubs" 😅

back then in 2000s, Carrick for Man Utd is like Pirlo for AC Milan and Alonso for Liverpool. Man utd would never won that many trophy without Carrick as he was the one who stays in front of the back four and helps Scholes controlling the stability of the middle.

Forgot to mention that England didn’t made the euros in 2008

There’s never been much chemistry until now, players have now put clubs to the side during the international team and we got to the final

Who’s here after England lost to Italy in penalty’s in the euros ?

@englenn806

2 жыл бұрын

Me

Carrick was world class on his day. If only we had Mourinho as manager.

@haaazzziiim

4 жыл бұрын

NPC #1734575 the sadest part is that u don’t even have an English manager that was good in that time lol

@jackjackyphantom8854

3 жыл бұрын

@@haaazzziiim Alex Ferguson?

@haaazzziiim

3 жыл бұрын

@@jackjackyphantom8854 he ain’t English he Scottish.

@jackjackyphantom8854

3 жыл бұрын

@@haaazzziiim For real?

@haaazzziiim

3 жыл бұрын

@@jackjackyphantom8854 yeah for real lol

Why everyone talks about Xavi and Iniestas Spain while Villa had the biggest impact in almost every single game

@midlands8819

4 жыл бұрын

A stricker cannot score without service received from his team

@NIKOS_GEROSIDERIS

4 жыл бұрын

@@midlands8819 He was a creator too.Go back and check videos of mundial 2010

@midlands8819

4 жыл бұрын

ΝΙΚΟΛΑΟΣ ΓΕΡΟΣΙΔΕΡΗΣ I didn’t say he wasn’t. Read my comment carefully

@cousinleigh1470

4 жыл бұрын

Midlands 88 same with Messi

@midlands8819

4 жыл бұрын

cousin leigh same what?

I was about to give a proper comment then I seen Joey. B in this clip and it reminded me and millions of others that England’s so called golden generation etc etc etc where not that good.

"Is it ever been home before?" Lol

Do a video on the amazing young goalkeeper with a bright future ahead of him. Gianluigi Buffon

@Usmosis

4 жыл бұрын

R/woosh

@ACMJ-kb5er

4 жыл бұрын

@Oscar Briceno The light

@walkitlikeitalkit.4692

4 жыл бұрын

Thats Donnarumma and Nubel

@9ranco

4 жыл бұрын

Gainlugi donnarumma and are you talking about when he was in the wc

@1984daydream

4 жыл бұрын

That was sarcasm. Jeez.

Excuse me Michael Carrick is an underrated genius

France, Brazil, Italy, Germany just smile watching this Video.... Greece even laughs out loud.

Another problem was that they were all playing in the premier league While players from the other countries were playing at different leagues. They end up bringing different tactics and mentality while in premier league they had a lot of rivalry against them selves like Terry and Ferdinand Gerard and Neville

Michael Carrick was a legend!!!

The reason is BECAUSE THE OTHER WERE DIAMOND GENERATION!!!!

@Graphhics

4 жыл бұрын

Definitely, if they were playing now it’d be different

@farhanfauzan8355

4 жыл бұрын

right.. Spain, France and Brazil sure did. & let's don't forget about Germany and Italy who simply rules the world at the time.

@rxchach

3 жыл бұрын

@@Graphhics but now they have limgardinhio 😂

@nigelnyoni8265

3 жыл бұрын

@@rxchach thou shalt not say the Lord Lingard's name in vain

@subasbhattarai541

3 жыл бұрын

Too many cooks spoil the broth

The left side of midfield was a massive problem for England during this time along with Scholes' retirement from international football.

I don't understand why OMG disrespected Carrick. He was the only good CDM and he was not given chance. Instead the used scholes as CDM.

carrick was a 'busquet' of england he is slow but his brain was class yet he was underated by england.. if england try to play 433 like today formation he would be incredible at cdm

Uh, because they ran into the golden generations of Spain and Germany! There, just saved you 6 minutes

@roadrage9191

4 жыл бұрын

And they were not that good anyways, some players were but majority was overhyped or just not great.

@LordFred69

4 жыл бұрын

@@roadrage9191 agreed. A big part of english media hype is always about selling jerseys and PL tickets

@e.l.b6435

4 жыл бұрын

That‘s the reason why our wc win 2014 was so important. We lost 2 times against Spain 2008 and 10.

@mactian9493

4 жыл бұрын

Clearly you forgot the golden generation of italy who had everyone from front to goal keeper.. that's why they won 2006 WC.. germany and spain at that time are rubbish compare to italy

@LordFred69

4 жыл бұрын

@@mactian9493 Germany came in 3rd that WC with a new young team...hardly rubbish. Lets not forget Italy's fall from grace after 2006.

Oooooooommmmmmmggggggggg What a team man . Only legends in this team

This video made me think about belgium

This is true, upon people say football originated from England,I always wonder why they have won the world cup once

Why didn’t they win? They weren’t good enough

@dantaylor7344

3 жыл бұрын

No they were good enough, they just had too many egos, not enough planning, terrible training regimes, appalling self belief, etc ............

@kamaleliyev127

3 жыл бұрын

No they did not gave proper coach

@halfvolley11

3 жыл бұрын

​@Chooey Sooares Champions League might be won by English football clubs, but not necessarily performed by English players, idiot. Premier League's greatest players like Ronaldo, Henry, Nistelroy, Viera, Van Persie, Torres were non-English. Just because Rooney, Lampard, Gerrar and Bekham were famous dont mean they won UCLs for their teams single-handedly. French and Dutch players had contribution in EPL than English.

@prateeksahoo10

3 жыл бұрын

Sometimes you lose even if you're good enough. Look at Real Madrid from 2010-13. They DEFINITELY deserved the CL in 2012. They were the best in Europe. But they got unlucky on penalties against Bayern. That being said, the golden generation was overrated.

@cddb5408

3 жыл бұрын

@United is Best I wanted Chelsea to face RealMadrid that year. If that happened Chelsea would definitely have not won it. Barca were much better than RealMadrid from 2008/09 to 2011 though. Real Madrid were given a lot of help in 2013 but still couldn't make the final that was certainly a failure. Also they were underachieving even more so before the period you said as they got knocked out in 6 consecutive last 16 matches 2004/05 to 2009/10.

An average team with 1 or 2 great players has the capability of winning... Too many great players are also a burden and no great players means no capabilities.

@bangrojai4868

Жыл бұрын

Too many idiots fans in England. They are mostly support their club and not their nation. It lead to a team that far from solid even the team full of superstars. I found it is stupid an Arsenal fans mocked Harry Kane in livestream comment England vs USA, England vs France. WTF . And fans that are doing that are on massive numbers. Idiots.

@BIadelores

Жыл бұрын

Chemistry and strategy is all that's important. Spain was a team filled with great players in every position, Xavi Iniesta Pique Villa Casillas Puyol etc etc and they won everything in their wake during their day. Argentina 1986 was a team with no names except Maradona and that was enough because they all trusted each other and played together.

Those legends🙆‍♂️😍 Beckham,Gerrard,Lampard,Evra,Rooney,Cole brothers,Terry ohh god 😔Soo sad they couldn't even win a euro

@MW-kw9xc

Жыл бұрын

Insanely overrated

0:40 got me on the floor😂😂😂

England’s current team has a lot of talent but simply not as much as the Netherlands or Belgium

@jeffybalpier7334

4 жыл бұрын

they had talents .its liverpool and .manchester united fault

@everythingisamindgame9666

4 жыл бұрын

Nah England is good nowadays thy r realising the depth of talent thy have reaching the semis when Kane the golden ball.

@jeffybalpier7334

4 жыл бұрын

@@everythingisamindgame9666 you think so .when they had owen scholes beckham neville brothers carragher sheringham cole.that team was better.

@saacidomar8752

4 жыл бұрын

@@jeffybalpier7334 they haven't great team now they have Lingard Handerson and Dele Ali in their Midfield 😝 plus Milner to substitute Phil Jones and Maguire on their defensive they are Lucky enough if they will not get humilation like Brazil Only their attacking line are pretty good SANCHO is something else

@saacidomar8752

4 жыл бұрын

@Swaglicious I'm talking your 2018 squad my friend but if your Coach will not ignore young talents that you have nowadays like Arnold Grealish Saka Sancho and so on it will be great for u wish you the best

England : make Beckham scapegoat. Beckham: am I joke to you.

@gontrandjojo9747

3 жыл бұрын

@@axelvincent4046 PSG wanted him to sell shirts.

Golden Generation i'm gli Azzuri fans...but 2006-2010 England team is very2 nice team Respect for England,special Beckham,Gerrard,Lampard your all the best 😘😘😘

Same in cricket too

Some of my favourite teams areManchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea, liverpool etc,, Neville, Rooney, Ferdinand etc, are on the squad, Man United used to be some of the best teams that there were.

England team has never been the consistent More the team is consistent more they can win the game Even today Both England team and England's club are inconsistent Thats the reason BPL is too much competitive

@ajaykhadka7094

4 жыл бұрын

@A M Today Liverpool is more consistent because look at their team We can rarely find the english players. The more you have english players in the team more inconsistent it becomes.

@harrykane1748

4 жыл бұрын

A M Exactly but England is still *”inconsistent”* to some people just because they haven’t won anything.

They were more indulge in their clubs rather than their Country....as simple as that

It was more about Raul,Morientes and Guti's Spain back then.

What the hell happened to Roberto Di Matteo: first Chelsea coach to win Champions League

@hayzar4054

4 жыл бұрын

ajay shaji oh my goal need to this

@LazerIsHere

4 жыл бұрын

This was my idea

@soccer2431

4 жыл бұрын

@@LazerIsHere what

@soccer2431

4 жыл бұрын

@@hayzar4054 I had been requesting it for many times. No reply yet

@milito537

3 жыл бұрын

Thomas Tuchel now 🏆 2021

"That's even worse than Arsenal"

Timing and tactical.

England lost....make me come here....to see the history and hope to change it for future achievements

1998-2006 Netherlands France Brazil Italy Protugal had great teams too..

We tried too much to revolve around all the players instead of building around certain key players. That was the strategy that flourished mostly during the golden generation era for club AND country. We needed underdogs in the team that surprised us with bangers but instead we got a 11-man-league-superstar team that tried too hard neglecting the basic problem. It won’t work. I acc blame the management, how did they keep that simplistic type of thinking for nearly a decade knowing that it just won’t work. They tried to make a dream team into something that would be possible to work with. In our dreams, it would. But it’s a dream for a reason. Too many variables around the golden generation being squashed into a team together alone makes it unlikely for it to work unless they could play and train with that type of team for a prolonged period.

To be fair, I think the golden generation did pretty well. Yes ,they underachieved according to their standards but seeing Gerrard and lampard in the same midfield made my day. They were unreal!

rivalry got in the way too much but the talent back then was incredible still just too much hatred and rivalry no coming together

They did pretty good regardless! I had been cheering for England's National Football team since about 1984 when I was just 8 years old and in all that time I believe the 2002 England Team was the best one they had. The only weak link perhaps being the goalkeeper. That team was in my opinion second best team to Brazil in 2002 - better than Germany and the rest of Europe. I am very delighted over the new team with Harry Kane being one of my favorite strikers right there with Gary Lineker.

I think one reason was the manager... Southgate is excellent

Broooo Carrick is a legend

Can you guys make a video about the possibilities of England in Euro 2020 ???

3:08 is that oh my goal's face?

@elias12___66

4 жыл бұрын

Hehe

My opinion: 1. Most of them were from rival teams which would be hard for them to team up 2. The media keeps on focusing on the youth 3. Other countries were just as good as them or better

@Onmysheet

3 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the WAGS making a distraction for the team. And they complained about the humid weather making it difficult. Please! The other top nations had no problems, especially Italy & France.

Certainly talent was unquestionable. It really was a dream team. Although great individually as a team they never blended for some reason. Obviously at the moment we have nobody as good as Beckham, but we have a team that blended and after all DID REACH A FINAL.

And yet still in July 2021, nothing changed.

That's one reason why you shouldn't fight on the pitch with other players because you never know a player from a different team can play on the same international team as you.

The problem was management, the manager should be blamed. If they played in a 4-3-3 or in a 4-3-1-2 daimond formation they would have achieved more

This talk of golden generation peaked in the lead-up to World Cup 2006 (and became quite simply unbearable). The thinking was that with the emergence of Rooney, Terry, Lampard and Joe Cole, England could finally complete a team that already had Campbell, Ferdinand, A. Cole, Gerrard, Beckham and Owen. That logic ignored 3 vital aspects: -There was little chemistry between those players, they were just names being scribbled on the team sheet. -No coach was able to find a formation that best suited all these players. -Most important of all, other nations (Brazil, France, Portugal, Italy, Argentina) had squads that were better than England's, with greater team spirit as well. Germany's midfield of Schneider-Ballack-Frings-Schweinsteiger wouldn't have been afraid of facing England either.

The fact this channel is called "Soccer" stories tells us how much value we should put on your opinion.

0:34 Gerrard on the left

When this video disrespect Carrick, i think whoever made this video doesnt know football.

'Too many cooks spoil the broth.' :)

All players were so good but .......... feeling very sad

England had Owen Hargreaves and he was our best DM. He could tackle, recover the ball, intercept, press, pass forward etc. A three man midfield of Hargreaves (DM), Scholes (CM) and Lampard/Gerrard (CM) would have solved our midfield issue.

@jagmaharesi2486

2 жыл бұрын

and your gaffer would get a lot of stick for dropping one of stevie/lamps by the media. Especially if it results in losing the game.

@patrickmccutcheon9361

2 жыл бұрын

Often thought the mistake was playing both Lampard and Gerrard.

They didn't win anything because the other teams playing at the time were simply better. That was the golden generation of football overall. That level of competition is returning now and the euros feels like a genuinely unpredictable tournament

@muthuchelvam6751

3 жыл бұрын

Yep

Indignante la forma en como se le falta el respeto a una leyenda como carrick