Thanks to Amazon for sponsoring this video. Use this link to download World of Tanks Blitz on the Amazon Appstore: smart.link/zxwewm1shihhw

@User-ot4qt

Жыл бұрын

Amazon massively exploits the working class, why do you accept them as your sponsor? I thought you had more integrity than this.

@lordkatze8942

Жыл бұрын

You also should cover the japanese heavy tanks from the normal game. I think they are more based on real designs.

@cuhyotepowered1201

Жыл бұрын

Pretty cool getting sponsored by Amazon on a channel that does little research.

@Cryo_Cake

Жыл бұрын

thanks but no thanks

@werteshboi8123

Жыл бұрын

The tank models all have the what looks like the AMX-50 hull

As an ex-blitz player, i can say with confidence that the devs like to straight up invent tanks for the game

@lordtachanka3543

Жыл бұрын

they adding Italian TDs on 9.4

@bombercbc9431

Жыл бұрын

wotb devs: the source is that i made it the fuck up

@einiboykebeb8101

Жыл бұрын

Well they did add semovente m41 and bassotto that are real

@Vorteks47

Жыл бұрын

Gotta add some fictional tanks to make it interesting lol

@bombercbc9431

Жыл бұрын

@@Vorteks47 straight from hirohito wet dream

A writeup from WoT Japanese tank enthusiast Leggasiini: Tier 5: Mitsu 108 - A fake fusion of Mitsu 104 and Ishi 108 heavy tanks (latter which is also likely a fake, and even the former is dubious).There's a chance both Mitsu and Ishi are fake tanks by themselves, so what we have here is potentially a fake tank that's a result of two fake tanks combined together. Still, assuming the Mitsu 104 is real (which is very close to this thing), the Mitsu 108 is basically like...1% historical. Tier 6: Ju-Nu - Completely fictional. Basically a what-if tank if Japan got the Tiger I tank and produced its own, native heavy tanks using features of the Tiger. The design is plausible, but its complete alternate-history fantasy. Tier 7: Ju-To - Completely fictional. Same story as the Ju-Nu, though the design is a lot less plausible. The hull design barely looks Japanese, and the side screens on the turret is something Japan really didn't do during WW2. Tier 8: Chi-Se - The only "real" vehicle in the branch, and even then it can be considered fictional, as the design is completely hypothetical. Chi-Se was a very obscure plan of "next generation medium tank", with 10.5 cm AT gun, rotating turret and "a new type of suspension". Nothing else was known - no drawings of it exist. It was presumably very late WW2 design and thus didn't get anywhere. It's commonly represented as basically a turreted Ho-Ri (sloped armor Ho-Ri hull, Chi-Ri turret and 10.5 cm gun), but there's no actual evidence the Chi-Se was exactly like that. Funnily enough, the design WG used for the Chi-Se is heavily based on the Chi-Se design made by the Japanese WoT PC community, which was done for their Japanese tech tree proposal. So basically, a community-made tank design has made it in. Pretty cool. Either way, some things about the Chi-Se are surely wrong - it was a MT, not HT (though functionally it was much closer to a HT than MT), and it has heavily overinflated armor. Tier 8 premium: Type 57 - Fake as fuck. Whereas the other heavies are at least somewhat believable designs, this one is total bullshit and is on par with shit like WZ-111 6 and new rocker booster derp gun heavies. It's like Object 252U fused with STA-1...what? There's nothing even remotely realistic about this tank. Tier 9 and tier 10: Type 68 and Type 71 - I list these together because their story and basis are identical. Basically, these are "what if" designs. Japan had weight restrictions due to bridges as stuff, as foreign MBTs would've been too heavy to cross them. This is why the Type 61 and STB-1/Type 74 were lighter than the comparable MBTs from other nations. The idea with these tanks is "what if Japan didn't have those weight restrictions and could design much heavier MBTs?". The designs are...actually not bad and quite believable. The Type 71 in particular is just a STB-1/Type 74 on steroids, a lot of steroids. Both of these tanks are bit too heavy to be feasible, though - if these were real, they most likely would've still capped to 50-55 tons, not almost 70 tons like the Type 71. However, while these are somewhat believable designs, they're still completely fictional. Basically, the HT line is mostly "what if" tech tree that is mostly based on theoretical possibilities. Its sort of "alternate history" line, but the designs (other than the tier 8 prem) are actually interesting and something Japan could've very well done if things went a bit differently. Like 95% fake if not more, but because the designs are fine and actually cool, I wouldn't mind if they were added.

@Swellington_

Жыл бұрын

Damn, you typed all that? That's more than I'll type all year😂😅

@CharcharoExplorer

Жыл бұрын

@@Swellington_ I didnt, the dude did and I shared it.

@Swellington_

Жыл бұрын

@@CharcharoExplorer oh,ok

@mrducky179

Жыл бұрын

the guy who wrote this has no idea about paragraph spacing

@CharcharoExplorer

Жыл бұрын

@@mrducky179 I apologize, he had paragraphs but when pasted here they were removed.

It is impressive how wargaming can craft these tanks quite realistically (most of the time) out of nothing more than references to real projects, proposals, influence of other nations and just trends in how nations design their tanks in their respective time periods.

@rattlesnake551

Жыл бұрын

yep, shame all the wot games are garbage

@yoshineitor

Жыл бұрын

Glorified Chi-Ris and similar tanks that look like Type 90 prototypes doe.

@trentkas

Жыл бұрын

@@rattlesnake551 mad cuz bad

@BenedictF79B

Жыл бұрын

​@@rattlesnake551 said by a man that don't know or don't want to enjoy the game

@civiltrack3583

Жыл бұрын

@@rattlesnake551 war thunder is shit too dude if not even worse

Man, using that original WoT garage music hit me right in the nostalgia.

@slothenthusiast5422

Жыл бұрын

back when the game was actually good

I do love how Wotb is embracing their Fictional Tanks than Wot PC does. and Damn sure is very fun to play Type 71 with those suspension thingy that make it go like a medium tank.

@tsuaririndoku

Жыл бұрын

It’s not fun to fight against hence its lowerplate is quite strong when angled.

@raymartcarreon6069

Жыл бұрын

It's fun to play Type 71, but not if you are the one going against type 71. I left the game because of it, it the only way my E100 can reliably pen the T-71 is on the rear, everywhere else it's either spam premium ammo or suffer.

@quisqueyanguy120

Жыл бұрын

@@raymartcarreon6069 Hah, I have the type 71 and while it is a fun and powerful tank, it is by no means OP. I can defeat it anytime with my IS-4.

@heshboi6025

Жыл бұрын

its such a boring tank to play

@whyyoumadbro2370

Жыл бұрын

@@raymartcarreon6069 Hit it with HE if you can’t pen with prammo, aim just under the gun for maximum splash damage, can reliably do 400+ damage easily

Also the annihilator with it's tripple rotating barrels each dispensing a round exists too, alongside anime tanks, Warhammer 40k tanks, and the sorts

@PanzertruppenLeopard_1

Жыл бұрын

those are straight made up and WG isn't saying that they are real like the japanese heavies.

@ironkaiser8227

Жыл бұрын

@@PanzertruppenLeopard_1 no shit sherlock Well except for the gup tanks that refers to actual tanks that actually existed

@neymarjr_.

Жыл бұрын

@@PanzertruppenLeopard_1 annihilator and those 40k tanks are actually complete real, those were American prototype tanks during the cold war, due to funding issue it never left beyond the drawing table.

@Bruhngus420

Жыл бұрын

@@neymarjr_. source?

@aceorcusham2870

Жыл бұрын

@@Bruhngus420 its a joke

If I might suggest another tank to take a look at, the Ha-Chi from Battlefield 5. It’s basically a Chi-Ha, but it has rocket pods on the side that allow it to fire barrages like a Sherman Calliope

@standard-carrier-wo-chan

Жыл бұрын

I'm interested in the thought process of BF5 developers in the making of that tank since Japan literally had an actual rocket-launcher Chi-Ha tank variant.

@alexboehm3919

Жыл бұрын

@@standard-carrier-wo-chan really? What’s the name of that variant? I’m intrigued

@standard-carrier-wo-chan

Жыл бұрын

@@alexboehm3919 Chi-Ha Rocket Minesweeper GS. Not exactly a true "rocket launcher tank", but BF5 dev team could've taken liberties based on this design instead. It has perhaps a 13.2mm or 25mm machine gun on the turret.

@ddm_gamer

Жыл бұрын

​@@standard-carrier-wo-chan Its mostly just time saving. BfVs british lineup literaly consists of 2 valentine variants and 2 churchill variants

Ah I remember the debut of world of tanks 10 years ago. I played this when I saw an ad over on History Channel about a tank game. Me, being a loco for tanks when I was a kid immediately played the game. I ran down the German Heavies because just everybody else, I want to get my hands on the Legendary Tiger, but enough said after months of playing WoT the game gradually expands the tech trees and it was this time I could see some tanks which only exists in blueprints and of course some of fictional tanks. As time passed by I could see an entire tech tree that didn't exist especially the introduction of the Waffentrager Tank Destroyer line. I finally concluded that, Wargaming no longer focuses on real tanks but more of the fantasy tanks of the devs. I quit WoT after that. Just sharing, no hate. I like WoT but I'm just disappointed on the number of fictional tanks present, not to mention most fictional tanks are OP.

@Juhnaaa

Жыл бұрын

War Thunder is the way to go for realism

@grumogus

Жыл бұрын

​@@Juhnaaa ye ghost shells are very realistic

@virtualtrucker26

Жыл бұрын

@@grumogus experienced that using the 268. With 303 pen I have no trouble shooting E-75s in point blank range. I shot 3 times no ricks or pens no nothing.

@grumogus

Жыл бұрын

@@virtualtrucker26 this along with the bs rng and match making made me quit wot i dont know if they fixed ghost shells in wt yet because i quit it 1year ago

@Tattle-by-Tale

Жыл бұрын

@@Juhnaaa I switched over to War Thunder for awhile, but that game has some serious issues. It's just a frustration simulator.

I played this tech tree line when they were first released. I had the impression that they look like and play like some of the German heavy tanks. They are all good tanks if you play them well.

@neymarjr_.

Жыл бұрын

they are broken, especially type 71. cant even penetrate the tank with the is7

@ilikeswedishmeatballs

Жыл бұрын

@@neymarjr_. that's because the is7 sucks

Type 71 might have been a reference to the STB-1 or Type 74 (if using the legendary Sankai Camo) which is what I generally believe since they are very similar in design

Both the Ju-Nu and Ju-To suspension is based on the real Japanese design that was proposed for the Type 5 Chi-Ri project. *''During the development of the Type 5 Chi-Ri several different experimental wheel and suspension designs where proposed. In the end it was decided to use the same suspension used on previous designs to cut down on development time. The one seen here was designed by the Technical Research Institute, known as the Chidori suspension it used eight interwoven road wheels supported by torsion bars in a similar manner to German Panther and Tiger tanks.''*

I didn't expect a video on this, but it is highly appreciated. Something felt off from the moment they were first shown

I'd love it if you did this for more Blitz lines! I'd love to hear about the 183 line or the Yoh line in more detail

Would be possible a video about the 60TP Lewandowskiego?

@ougioshino6940

Жыл бұрын

I would like that since WG says polish heavy tanks were based on student proyects of a military academy but the only sources I could find are the ones made from WG

Someone on discord once told me that the number "71" on Type-71 means the year where the tank being developed, 1971

@tinylegofiend8605

Жыл бұрын

The Japanese did use a similiar system, however they used a different calendar system. I can't remember well but in the 1940s it was the 2000s in the Japanese reckoning.

@thenumbah1birdman

Жыл бұрын

@@tinylegofiend8605 1940s was 2600 numbering. Type 97 for the Chi-Ha means "Type 2597"-1937.

@i_nameless_i-jgsdf

Жыл бұрын

That is the case for all post-war tanks accepted by the JGSDF. Type 61 is in service in 1961, Type 74 in 1974, Type 90 in 1990, Type 10 in 2010, Type 16 in 2016 etc...

Great video! I am currently grinding for the Tier VIII Chi-Se on the Japanese Heavy line

Can you make a video also talking about the fake Italian TDs?

@LeeMadik

Жыл бұрын

Yes please, i also think Italians aren't real!

@russianwarsupporterz1499

Жыл бұрын

Bruh only the Tier V starter TD is the real one, go look it up before you make these Untruthful comments

@taquito_de_agua

Жыл бұрын

@@russianwarsupporterz1499 I never said that the tier V was fake lol

@HarverTheSlayer

Жыл бұрын

For what little information I have, tiers VIII and above seem to be based on OTO-Melara's participation on the MBT-70 project, as they were responsible for developing its autoloading system and, if you compare the designs in the game with that real project, they share a lot of similarities. So I'd say WG just took that and ran with it, turning it into "OTO-Melara then designed their own stuff" and stretching it into 3 different vehicles (4 or 5 if that also applies to the tier VII and the premium).

Was it just me or did anybody else noticed how much the Chi-Se's hull looks like the ones from AMX 50 line? 5:22 -Yes I am a French main in WoTB , WoT and also War Thunder, how did you know?

@deedeeramone34

Жыл бұрын

Ah, a man of culture

Hey, companies needs something new to spark their customers' interest. I used to make scale models primarily with WW2 Japanese war machines but after a while I yearn something more than another Zero or Chi-Ha. I even dug up an old, unfinished Tiger tank model and painted it with Japanese armor camo. One of my earliest kit bash was slapping three Russian tank models together in an attempt to make the T-35 land battleship. I rarely make any models these day but I have noticed that there is a rise of experimental or "What If" and even alternate history fantasy WW2 vehicles being released in the scale model market. Their rel life origins might be dubious but they do add some interesting diversity to your model collection.

I'd love to see this sort of thing again but maybe with a different line (Such as the new italian TD's or the British AT series)

Technically speaking you dont have to disprove them. Its nearly impossible to prove a negative as nobody ever wrote "We made this only in blueprints and it was never actually made." The people saying it is histroical need to provide evidence of the existence of the tank with actual certified documentation.

@johnsatan117

Жыл бұрын

Yep, Wargaming has the Burden of Proof

Weird how they did this line completely differently to original WoT when the other lines seem to be fairly similar. The Japanese heavy line in WoT starts at tier 6 with the real on paper and maybe one prototype built O-I. The tier 7-8 O-Ni and O-Ho are almost certainly WG original developments of the O-I. For tier 9-10 are the Type 4 Heavy and Type 5 Heavy, which are more distinct as their own design. I've seen some allegations that the turret of a prototype Type 4 was used in a fortification in Manchuria, but I'm not aware of any concrete evidence either this turret or the rest of either of these tanks existed either as prototypes or even on paper.

@somedude8504

Жыл бұрын

there are some other unique lines in Blitz, such as the Ho-Ri line, as well as a change to some tier 10s with the tier 10 if the french td line being the foch 155 but with a 2 shot autoloader instead

@warpey5632

Жыл бұрын

As far as I know, a prototype of the O-I was constructed and tested. It failed due to its inability to drive through mud and the suspension breaking under the immense weight of the vehicle. After that, the Japanese concluded that vehicles of such weight would be impractical which puts an end to the O-I project and any future heavy tank projects. The O-Ni, O-Ho, Type 4 and Type 5 are War Gaming's interpretation of what Japan would have potentially evolved into if they decided to continue developing such vehicles.

@Catani99

Жыл бұрын

The O-Ni and O-Ho are not actually made by WG, they are based on the O-I 100t and O-I 120t designs floating around from different books and articles; it was only found out they were incorrect interpretations of the actual O-I after the tree was added. As for the Type 4 and Type 5, it’s highly likely that their story and sketch was made up by WG. There was no need for the Japanese to develop the O-I past the prototype, as it was a complete failure in all trials.

@Catani99

Жыл бұрын

Here’s a good article going far more into detail about where the basis for all these tanks came from: sensha-manual.blogspot.com/2020/05/fake-japanese-super-heavies.html?m=1

@bobdickens3674

Жыл бұрын

I believe they did this to stay true to the fact that they’d never add the WOT PC heavies to blitz

There's also the Italian tank destroyer but I got suspicious when I reach tier 6-10

I'm happy to see that world of tanks blitz is getting some love on the channel

There are a number of tanks that could fit this series in blitz including the Minataro Italian tank destroyer line hitting wot blitz in a few days or so

@moisesezequielgutierrez

Жыл бұрын

The Yoh line too

@calculusantienjoyer254

10 ай бұрын

@@moisesezequielgutierrezthe Yoh line did actually exist but only in concept and drawinfs

I’m glad you covered this topic, cause I play this game quite a lot and was really skeptical as if these tanks were real or not

Wow thanks for showcasing this game, I genuinely didn't expect that. Perhaps you could showcase the Japanese Tank Destroyers next?

@shouhanyun8203

Жыл бұрын

Pretty sure he already did the Ho-Ri

@hexagonstudios5601

Жыл бұрын

@@shouhanyun8203 the Wotb Ho Ri

@carized8852

Жыл бұрын

@@hexagonstudios5601 it would just be the same thing though

I'm waiting for the video on the tank from Trax, the Gameboy game. It was apparently based on blueprints of a football, but I cannot find anything online to verify this. Also, kudos on the Amazon sponsorship!

I’m really glad you made a video involving WoTB since it is the game I have been playing for 4 years. Also I liked the music you used in your promotion, can you give the name of it?

One of the tanks in the middle of the line up reminds me a lot of the TAS-44M, the Hungarian 'Panther'...

Generally large rounded designs (ie Cold war Russian Turrets) are cast pieces, whereas more angular designs are welded from smaller pieces. I don't know if Japan even could make designs like the last three with the factories they had in that time period. The smooth lines of the earlier proposed designs may run into the same issue, or just be a result of the way the images are rendered.

He used the Old World of Tanks Theme So much nostalgia

Would like to see a video on the Italian tank destroyers like the minotauro etc

Could you do a video on the tier 9 Soviet light tank Object 84?

Just you were mentioning "Che-Go" ,i've seen it rolling on the screen near my tank 8))))

You should do the PC World of Tanks Japanese heavy tank line.

@teetasse4012

Жыл бұрын

didnt he already do that?

@avgjoeavglife

Жыл бұрын

@@teetasse4012 If he did then i missed it.

Finally you talked about this!

the type68 when mounting the stock turret, shows an early leopard's turret...

Is WoT B enjoyable, I need a break from the pain that is WarThunder.

@big_meaty_thighs2519

Жыл бұрын

Easy to grind You can get a tier 10 in about a week

@alanm1121

Жыл бұрын

yup

@Poltard

Жыл бұрын

Jesus christ, and its fun too right, I’m not gonna get like, buttsecks by a waffenträger 50mi away right?

@Poltard

Жыл бұрын

Oh also how much MB is it, don’t have that much since I use a laptop.

@big_meaty_thighs2519

Жыл бұрын

@@Poltard hell no lmao maps are smaller so spotting is a lot less complicated It’s watered down wot pc dude

Everyone seem to forgot that World of Tanks design are mostly relied on references from real life tank design The game has its own game lore explaining all these weird tank designs Especially this Japanese collaboration with German Engineers

I always enjoy these videos, See you next time when you cover the Chinese Rocket Propelled tanks that are gonna be added into the PC version in a few months lmao.

Is the Designation Ju right i think you said in another video that the designations Chi and Ho means Medium tank and SPG. So is the Ju designation right for a Heavy tank?

@Kalashnikov413

Жыл бұрын

No

honestly, i love this line. if i look at these tanks, i think to myself: hmm, i can beliveve japan making such vehicles in an alternate history unlike italian and polish vehicles, i think these tanks are fine. for poland, they didnt have nearly enough tanks to have a general ,,feeling" of a polish tank, which is why i dont like the idea of the polish tech tree (altho the 60tp does look nice). for italy, they had enough tanks to make something, but not a big tech tree, so wg just made up a heavy and td line to go alongsides with the half-fake medium line. but for these japanese tanks, they genuinely have that japanese ,,feeling" and i really do think, that these fake tanks are actually completely fine

As a world of tanks blitz player i am honoured that you mad a video about these thanks

Hey, ConeOfArc, your intro with the bogus, multi-turreted Soviet tank falling over like a billboard had me laughing all day. Thanks!

I think a tank needs to actually exist to be ingame. I will accept some unbuilt tanks but they need atleast one finished hull with a turret which could fit it.

The O-I tank existed and was built and tested and should be added to war thunder as part of the tech tree.

4:08 Wait why does the chassis of the JU-TO look like that of the chassis of the American T-14?

The Japanese heavy tanks in World Of Tanks Blitz is just Wargaming not wanting to add the Type 5 heavy line in World Of Tanks,so they made this fake line

The tier 9,10 is really fun to play with in a platoon because both of those tanks type 68 and 71 have insanely troll armour in the game but wg. have to nerf those 2 tanks and its still can do some troll bounces . Fun in a game mode

I never thought he would do a video on world of tanks little brother world of tanks blitz. I do have the type 71 on blitz it's a dynamic tank to say the least.

Nice work...I figured that these tanks were mostly as fake as the day is long...though if they showed up on WoT PC I'd certainly play them, since the existing heavy line in that game has been power-creeped to hell!

Talking about world of tanks, can you make a video on the sturmtiger line from the console version of wot?

This is the first time I've seen Amazon sponsor someone

Any chance of doing a video on the core game's Japanese Heavy Tank line (Type 91 to Type 5)?

Finally , coneofarc make a video about wotb japan heavy tech tree

WoTB is also on the Nintendo Switch, my son plays blitz with me, he plays on our switch, I play on my laptop, or sometimes my phone.

Hi Cone. Speaking of WOT Blitz... Is there any reality behind the premium vehicle so called "59-Patton" (which the bio in the game explains something like "A Type-59 hull with a 48-Patton turret")?

I found the heavy line to be a mixed bag. I hated the tier 5 and 7. Actually had fun with the 6, 8 and 9. I haven't played the tier 10 since tier 10 tanks aren't cheap and I bought other tier 10's already researched instead.

I have already been playing WotB since the begining

Finally a video on Blitz

i quit wotb and switched to war thunder a year ago and i have never felt happier already have 1200+ kills with the IS2(1944) and now have purchased and crewed the IS3 but 6.3 is still the main BR i play in WT since i have a great line up consisting of the IS2(1944),T34-85,IS2(1943),2S3M and yak 3, still dont have a line up for 7.0 however.

With the amount of blueprint only/outright fictional tanks in WoT (and to a lesser extent War Thunder), I'm a little surprised we haven't got a similar style of tank game that's just all fictional tanks from fictional countries.

Perhaps do a review on the Type 5 line on WOT?

I’m gonna give personal thought on the mitsu the design is kind of also a combination from the T-28 they have few similarities unless I’m worng

Any chance of a follow-up video on the PC line with the O-Ni, O-Ho, Type 4 and Type 5?

@glamrockchica909

7 ай бұрын

Yeah because I’m interested in if these ever existed

@hyperdimensionbliss

7 ай бұрын

@@glamrockchica909 TL:DR only the O-I existed but we have no concrete knowledge of what the prototype looked like before it was dismantled and the documents destroyed to prevent the States from finding out about it. We literally only had a single track link survive as physical proof it was built in any capacity. The O-Ni, O-Ho, Type 4 and Type 5 are pure fiction.

And to think that a decade ago, this game made changes to the upper front plate of the Tiger II, nerfing it as a heavy, for "reasons of historical accuracy."

As an old time WoT player, who started in 2010(in December, still counts) I have to say... wtf?! What is this and where does it come from? And maybe I haven't played WoT for some time, but I'm pretty sure it isn't in the game.

@AmadarianArkwing

Жыл бұрын

Mobile platform World of Tanks Blitz.

As a blitz VIII TD, these are pain to deal with

Speaking of fake japanese tanks, Men of War, Assault Squad 2 has not only alternative takes on Ho-Ri SPGs(since the game has infantry, the versions with 37mm guns are more useful to devs then sloped ones in Warthunder), but also a Chi Ri with 88mm gun, a copy of Flak 36 IJA captured in China in 1937-1940. This gun was produced by Japan unlike many other types of captured equipment. Remember lackluster japanese 25mm gun based on Hotchkiss? Remember how they also tried to copy Bofors 40mm in 1945 out of desperation? What if I told you that IJA captured several dozen german 3,7cm autocannons in China back in 1937 _and never told IJN, who needed such gun?_

Can you also do a video of the Japanese Heavy tank line in the PC version.

Finaly the mobile version of wot has apeared in your vids

"My source is that I made it the fuck up!" -WarGaming, probably

Ju-Nu appears to have several features of vaguely planned Chi-Ri II. The autoloader and hull 37mm gun from original Chi-Ri were to be discarded. 88mm gun, overlapping suspension with wide tracks and sloped armour were also supposedly considered. A gentle slope just like in Chi-To production version would have made sense, though a welded turret would have fit better to that idea.

i mean I understand why people would complain about Wargaming and them making fake tanks, but at least they actually do make the tanks look like something their respective country would make, although they're fake they look realistic enough

@neymarjr_.

Жыл бұрын

yes exactly

What about the WoT PC Japanese heavy tank line? Are they more historically accurate? ((Yes, I want you to finally make a video about the O-I))

You should do the Japanese 100 ton Heavy Tank the O-i Experimental there's a original artist depiction of the tank and maybe blueprints.

Do the Yoh series tanks next of the United States tech tree.

my fav tank game thanks cone of ark

how much is a ConeofArc TV? how much are you selling?

Please do a video about Italian tank destroyers next

The Ju-To turret looks like the Class 3 (P) Turret

Speaking of WOTB, any chance you review the Polish Heavies and British Heavy lines?

@yi_hou3092

Жыл бұрын

Most of the heavies in the British Line are real only the 215b isn't, the 215b (183) is supposed to be the next tank after the Conqueror

Wow, a sponsor from Amazon itself. Nic3

Could you say about the T25/2 and the T25 At series of american tank destroyers?

I decided to watch this despite the amazon sponsorship. You should be honored.

What about the OG japanese heavy tanks from the PC version?

As a player of the World of Tanks PC (not the PC port of Blitz btw), I am curious. Is this a second Japanese heavy line because on the PC version there is only one line of Japanese heavy tanks? I have never seen these tanks before in the PC version.

@carized8852

Жыл бұрын

This line is only in blitz so far

YOOO YOU ACTUALLY KNOW THIS GAME

Do the PC super-heavies next

When they started making up tanks is when I stopped playing but that was years ago

Now ya just gonna look at the annihilator in blitz and look at its design

And WoT sponsored this video! I was considering this game until I watched one of their release videos. The dialogue was "buff this... nerf that.... blah blah nerf nerf buff buff." I thought that can't be good. This is not going to be historically accurate. I was right. It turned out to be go-karts on tracks with an RNG aiming system. I play their competitor and I don't regret that decision.

The irony of the sponsorship

Hey con arc can u please make a video about the yoh tank line of world of tanks blitz

They're big and cool and I love them

Ju-nu is Japanese Tiger by WG hence its overall asthetic Ju-To is King Tiger

Highly doubt that the M 104 that is shown right at the end is Japanese, considering all the specs are written in Swedish. Had a big double take there.

I kinda like the fake tanks. Typically WG does a pretty fair job with their “what if” tanks. Most are how I imagine they’d look if they tried that.