Something I noticed was that on the Dzo I found myself instantly looking at the subject and with the Tamron I looked at the out of focus area.

Sorry but the Tamron looks way better to me. I think you’re wanting the cine lens to win but the Tamron has character as well. Add a Pro Mist and the Tamron is better.

@Imaginelotus

Жыл бұрын

Thank you. Colors pop way more on the Tamron. The contrast is beautiful

Lens a/b Will be easier to write lens brand x lens brand. ?

Great comparison! This is probably the closest I've seen a photo lens get to the DZO. What version of the Tamron lens are you using?

@MaikHansen

Жыл бұрын

The first version. I think the biggest difference was in the second test with the portrait 🙏🏻

Excellent comparison and info!

@MaikHansen

Жыл бұрын

Glad it was helpful! 😊

So sick again man 👍🏽 best AC you had there!

@MaikHansen

Жыл бұрын

No doubt man!

Cool video, definitely different priorities for stills and videography where the Cine lens values accurate focus, brightness and DOF, compromising image perfection where the stills lens focuses on sharpness and contrast.

@MaikHansen

Жыл бұрын

Totally agree! happy you found it valuable 😊

I looked up for video like this because I felt like there is no really big of a difference between cinema and photo lens in image quality, and this video confirmed that for me. Ofc there are differences in using a lens like better manual focus, same size lenses in set...

Huge contrast and color difference between them. The most stark difference between the two. All down to the coatings.

A hint for your next video: your audio balance is off (right channel noticably louder than the left one) 😉

For me Tamron looks better xD

And its Leitz for the win.

I am not wealthy, so besides bokeh and 1/3 stop in more brightness (both greater on the cine), I see no benefit to spending 3x on glass, and will continue building my full-frame EF lens collection for my pocket 6k. I never rely on AF, and adapting still glass for follow focus in easy, so that is not a factor. I also rent a good number of lenses for special shots etc, and find FF glass so much more varied. Thanks for the comparison.

My right ear loved this

Maybe is good idea to ty with a face also to see the difference

Splitting hairs. Giving up autofocus is tough for most of us. I do agree that the DZO is more filmic but I'm not convince you can’t fake it in post.

@MaikHansen

9 ай бұрын

I get it! And it's been a time now that I have used the DZO and I personally never want to go back to photography glass. Probably I'm going to share another video as a long term review :)

Hey Maik! How about going Vintage way...? Like Mark Holtze suggest... in this video... kzread.info/dash/bejne/oaxrw9l7Zt20e9I.html As i remember, he has more videos about rehousing Vintage lenses difrent ways...

@MaikHansen

Жыл бұрын

Also a very good opportunity! But I would mainly use the vintage lens for my own personal projects instead of my client work. The dzo‘s are for me the perfect match with look and feel 👍🏼

big big difference

There are no strong differences that can be perceived with the eye... The differences that exist are not real, they only exist in your mind!

I’ve spent over 30k on lenses. For sone reason I love the tamron 28 - 75! You have reinforced my opinion and also shown me with a tiny bit of filtration it’s as good as the DZO at best at worst no one watching the images without comparison will give a monkeys or even think about it! You’ve made me realise I’ve wasted far too much money on lenses for no one to be able to see a noticeable difference anyway. On another note vintage lenses are now the way to go!

@Samskihero

7 ай бұрын

I've been in this industry for over 8 years now, I've never really cared much for spherical glass until somewhat recently and I think people viciously over-execrate the effects of the glass unless you are comparing £80 Nifty Fifties to £800 L lenses, yeah there's an importance to sharpness and contrast, but most high-end spherical optics all fall within the same overall look and character, I find it most strange when people boast about certain optics but never actually tell you why they like it so much definitively.

@SalRomney-yh8iz

7 ай бұрын

@@Samskihero100 % the differences are so minute between sensors and glass. The truth is you can create high end footage with a budget of less than 10k and get better quality than a Hollywood blockbuster of say 15 years ago and minute differences to most eyes from films of today.

actually disturbing man damn. the tamron looks so fine and pleasing. its the same with the sigma arts. still lenses look so sharp and contrasty, wtf is going on

@d_FLDE

7 ай бұрын

.. just buy good cine lenses :D