Making you hook up a TV to see its interface is like a '90s version of making you pair it with your phone and install an app.

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Ha! True.

@founderio

7 ай бұрын

But somehow needing a TV is still the better of the two options...

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

@@founderio Aye, it is at least future proof from the perspective of not relying on servers and credentials

@AmEv7fam

7 ай бұрын

Although trying to find a new TV with composite in is getting frustratingly difficult. I know, there's plenty of TVs with composite at thrift stores, but not always consistently.

@PhAyzoN

7 ай бұрын

@@AmEv7fam There's endless ways to convert composite video into HDMI though. Everything from simple $10 garbage on Amazon to the expensive converters and scalers popular among the retro gaming community.

I'm so happy that you don't do youtube shorts

@ChairmanMeow1

7 ай бұрын

Me too. Give me the long form LGR always!!

@seijiamasawa2320

7 ай бұрын

yes!

@jakematic

7 ай бұрын

Shorts are for those who just want entertainment, not knowledge

@SC_3

7 ай бұрын

@@jakematic I wouldn't say that, necessarily. Vsauce has done really well with short-form content, all neat and educational!

@jollygrapefruit786

7 ай бұрын

I think he should at least clip his videos and upload them as shorts. They're good for growing your channel and I want him to have as much success as possible.

Even for today's standards, I could see people enjoying those print photographs. I can't imagine enjoying that quality and immediacy back in the '90s!

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Thermal photo printers truly blew my mind as a youngin back then. I was utterly enamored with those Kodak Picture Kiosks which used very similar printers!

@matthewjbauer1990

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR As someone who used one of those Mavica when they were new, I think a 1.3 mp, printing 4x6 or 3x5 photos would hold up today.

@tschuuuls486

7 ай бұрын

You can buy battery powered dye sub printers. For example Kodak Mini 2 retro.

@jayd8743

7 ай бұрын

Same tech in some current printer systems... Quality had always been good. Think you can even get the paper for these still as the fuji and okympus systems used them and hospitals still use them as do baby scanning photos.

@Psythik

7 ай бұрын

Look into zInk printers. They're pretty much the same thing except portable and modern!

One of my first jobs in the game industry was to test games. This is what we used to take screenshots if you were lucky. Otherwise, it was a digicam on a tripod aimed at the TV

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

That's awesome.

@electron8262

6 ай бұрын

That must have been such a fun job!

@Lurch-Bot

6 ай бұрын

Aiptek Pwn Cam, lol.

@JohnFekoloid

3 ай бұрын

PC didn't have Prnt Screen?

Being able to get clean screenshots from consoles is to me the coolest part.

@nsf001-3

7 ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure this is how gaming magazines did it in the 90s/00s. Or at least one of the ways they did it

@himbourbanist

6 ай бұрын

I was thinking the exact same thing, they probably did this or had a pro grade device@@nsf001-3

@Lurch-Bot

6 ай бұрын

I have a Roxio video capture device from 2004 that will do the same thing.

@Lurch-Bot

6 ай бұрын

@@nsf001-3 The ones with a budget were probably using Sony Digital 8 Handyjobs. VGA stills would have looked pretty good printed in a '90s magazine.

[gentle floppy disk noises, gentler jazz music] I love your captions!

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Thanks 😁

Engineering Dept: "Stop showing the floppies going in backwards!" Marketing: "NEVER!"

@nsf001-3

7 ай бұрын

How else with they know it's a floppy? 😱

@richkawaiipikachu

7 ай бұрын

Don't forget, there's also upside-down CD'S.

@4Wilko

7 ай бұрын

I wonder if any customers inserted their diskettes wrong because of that.

@MicrophonicFool

7 ай бұрын

I was very disturbed by that image.

@0x0fffff

7 ай бұрын

@@4Wilko I know people inserted RAM expansions backwards in their computers because of that

I remember thinking 640*480 was a good enough resolution for digital cameras because pictures of that size looked decent on my 1024*768 monitor and appeared as roughly the size of a normal photograph.

@sandrinowitschM

7 ай бұрын

@@franky9928 I've recently learned that the design resolution for macOS ICONS is 1024*1024. I'm imagining my old Riva TNT struggling to display more than two freaking buttons.

@PhAyzoN

7 ай бұрын

I remember gaming magazines and demo discs back in the day boasting about "high resolution screenshots" of upcoming games. They were all 640x480!

@Psythik

7 ай бұрын

​@@PhAyzoNTo be fair, very few games ran at 640x480 in the 90s. Most console games ran at much lower resolution - with very few games actually running at a native 480i - so 640x480 was enough to capture just about any game footage.

@Kumimono

7 ай бұрын

I've noticed that a 640x480 is still plenty enough for your Instagram feed and such. Have few Mavica shots on mine, can't really tell they're 20 plus years old. (Well, technically. New old stock?)

@nsf001-3

7 ай бұрын

I remember when I thought 3.5" floppies could hold 3 Megabytes because the ones I had said "3M" on them

I honestly can't get over the quality of those photos for 1999.

My mom was a professional photographer in the late 90s. She had something similar to this. She used an expensive medium format camera for the serious photos at weddings and for portraits. But she also carried an early digital camera and a portable printer that she could use at the reception to grab photos of guests and whatnot. She could then print photos right there on the spot for people to take home. Her printer was a lot smaller than this one. I am pretty sure it was ink jet and only printed wallets and 4x6 or 5x7s.

@MicrophonicFool

7 ай бұрын

The Polaroid Instant cameras used to fulfill that role, but your mom was ahead of the trend which is now wedding parties handing out a dozen Fuji Instax which every one passes around. All the material becoming people taking, leaving, trading or gifting some of the pics to the couple.

@MrDuncl

7 ай бұрын

We went to EuroDisney in 1996. On the Thunder Mountain Roller Coater they had cameras capturing each pair of seats at the top of the loop. When you got off the ride you could see all the pictures on screens and if you liked yours buy a decent sized dye sub printout. Very impressive stuff for the time.

"Stick em on your Angelfire page?" Damn, guilty as charged

In the late 1990s I was working as a computer magazine journalist. I undertook a group test review of lots of colour inkjet printers, and one test was photo print quality. The ideal of saving money and time on getting "professional photo prints" was very alluring for many. In my testing I learned that, to match 35mm photo print quality, you usually had to match the manufacturer's own brand of premium photo printer paper to their own printer, and then select to print at high quality (so, usually, very slow - it could take several minutes to output). And then your print had a limited life span because, ultimately, it was just ink on paper. They were very prone to UV light damage meaning that, if you pinned one to a refrigerator (for example), light coming in from the window would slowly bleach out all the colour over the space of a year or two. Only cyan would stick around, if I recall correctly. I'm actually not sure if things are better right now. Back then, we all considered dye sublimation printing technology to be the best for photos - but it was many times the cost of the cheap inkjets that were flooding the market.

@IgnatSolovey

7 ай бұрын

Dye sublimation technology (it's Mitsubishi ALPS originally, everyone else licensed it, including Sony and Canon) is still really good, it's the only printing technology that allows to reproduce full sRGB range in print - and considering that some, if not all, implementations include the “fifth dye”, which is an anti-UV protection layer, they are probably the longest lasting form of color photographs, apart from plasticized prints that are sandwiched between a sheet of Alubond and a sheet of UV-stable acrylic (and that costs... no... T.H.A.T. C.O.S.T.S.). That puts properly processed Kodachromes that are stored in national archives like the LOC or BNA to a third place, because plastic sheets with UV protection layer are much more stable medium than a celluloid film or even an offset paper and ink (those discolored 1960s...2000s magazines, aha). There are two problems with dye-sub prints. First, the largest format of DSPs ever available was and is 21×30 cm (only Mitsubishi and Sony did that, not Canon). Second, they are quite sensitive to dust before and during printing, Canon in particular.

@hey_imriver

7 ай бұрын

As someone who enjoys papercrafting and tried printing a model using photo paper a few months back, they are not... I spent quite a while building the damn thing and the result looked awesome, until I noticed how the browns became greens and reds became oranges some weeks later. Tossed all of the models built with photo paper in the trash

@NinjaSushi2

7 ай бұрын

Cool.

@ericpullen524

7 ай бұрын

@@IgnatSolovey The largest DSP for consumer use was 21x30cm, but there were commercial ones that printed 120cm wide. They were massive, company I worked for had 2 of them at one point.

@straightpipediesel

7 ай бұрын

@@IgnatSoloveyTektronix, which sold their printer operation to Xerox, did 12 x 18 inch (366x457 mm) dye-sub. See the Phaser 480X.

The mini arcades on that vintage camera legit looked like an early 90s arcade lineup on a high end Polaroid. Very cool xD

I'm so happy you make proper videos and not shorts. Theyre a true blight.

It still astounds me when we look at pictures my Grandma took in the 90s (When I was a wee baby) that you can make out fine details on the film like the covers of books or the shape of flower petals in the background.

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

35mm film in particular is awesome. The effective resolution equivalent is larger than 4K: 5,600 x 3,620 pixels!

@FuzzballRenakitty

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR The reason "digital remasters" are garbage on non- film media :P

@blunderingfool

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR Oh? That explains a lot, thanks!

You know, you hear "floppy disk photo printer from the 90s" and you think it's going to be cute and antiquated, but damn if that thing doesn't put out some seriously good looking prints, and the ability to screenshot composite video sources like that is amazing. I would have used that to an irresponsible level if I had had that as a kid.

@sjogosPT

7 ай бұрын

if i had something tike that, i would used to an irresponsible level too for sure. I would print alots of screenshots of ps1 games and dragon ball prints from tv, thats for sure.

@orthodox_gentleman

6 ай бұрын

What making a secret Jack stash from your dad’s vhs p*rn? Lol

My middle school teacher had that printer for science fair projects, I used to borrow the Mavica camera for photos of growing vegetables, insert the floppy disk and printed the photo for progress reports! That saved so many students time and effort for school projects!

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

That's a great use case!

@Markimark151

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR saved lot of students time and from buying more film!

"stick em on your Angelfire". LOL Dude, you unlocked a core memory.

I love the style. Tech aesthetics peaked in the late 90s/early 00s, IMO

I took a selfie with this same camera in 2002. I used that very same selfie to meet my now current wife 3 years later. and to prove the Internet never forgets. That image is still online some 20+ years later.

Man I love the look of older Sony gear. Just looks so clean and advanced. If they still made stuff that looked this cool, I'd be more tempted to go with Sony.

@eggbreakerdotexe

7 ай бұрын

I'd actually really like the look of the PS5 if it weren't so annoyingly huge.

@JackBandicootsBunker

7 ай бұрын

@@eggbreakerdotexeI guess now with the Slim on the horizon, that appreciation might be attainable.

@ferretyluv

7 ай бұрын

Sony cameras still look small, sleek, and cool.

@K12machinima

2 ай бұрын

Chunky, angled, and gunmetal-grey. Classic, 90’s, Sony tech was rad, man, and it felt satisfying to use. :)

I love everything about this. The aesthetic of the unit, the controls. The ASMR. 3.5 inch Floppies will never not be satisfying to use. Clunk!

@Mrshoujo

7 ай бұрын

*style *3.5 inch

I have a Sony Mavica MVC-CD1000 camera that I bought circa 2000. It uses 8cm cd discs to store the images. When you take photos with it, you can hear the CD spinning up and the read/write head activating. The photo quality was exceptional for the time and still looks impressive. Paired with a good inkjet printer, it rivals film camera prints of the day. I have dozens of the 8cm discs with my photos. They are still readable to this day. Truly a nostalgic electronic device to have.

Hearing the old Sony shutter sound bought back a core memory

8:53 Sony really likes their loud beeps, I thought it was my PlayStation booting up.

Hey Clint, you inspired me to grab myself a FD-90 and shoot some stuff at a recent blink-182 concert - so much fun to use. Thanks, as always, for your great content!

Those pictures look super good. It's rare to see physical pictures of such things and of that quality. Its like a real good magazine article picture.

Ooo, being able to capture arbitrary input video frames is SUCH a fun feature to add on there! Neat use of the technology already prepped to print video stills!

Love the tuctuctuctuctuc of the later Mavicas steaming past the tracks compared to the speed of a regular floppy drive.

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Yes, those 4X drives in particular are quite impressive!

I love how direct video capture has literally never become an obsolete selling point. I remember an ad for a Samsung phone a couple years back that touted the video quality being so good that you could capture photography quality screengrabs with a button in its video player.

Back in '99 or '00 I had a gig using that exact Mavica ( the first one you showed) with a couple of nightclubs taking photos of peeps for their very 90s website. I recall the hassle of going around with a bunch of floppy disks. Add alcohol to the mix and you could say that was not my best body of work. LoL

I got to use a Sony Floppy camera in 2000 while in 8th grade to build the school's website. The computer teacher got me in an independent study class for the website and later hooked me up with the summer tech maintenance guys for my first "real" job. I recently got most of my old ZIP disks copied off with the photos I took, and they were not good, haha.

I would have loved to have that in the 90s! Even without using the printer part it's still cool just to take screenshots from the TV. That it can print such great images is a bonus.

Devices like this must have been a treat for folks who had to get screen captures for whatever publications they worked for. Hell, I could see myself using something like this still.

late 90's early 00's I worked at as a Walmart 1hr photo developer. We had got the new frontier digital photo printing system that took the digital content and created photos through the same system as our 35mm. It was and still is the best digital printing you could get. It took high res photos from your digital camera and projected it onto real photo paper that was chemically processed. In high school I was very involved in the technology teams and we had several of the sony mavica cameras because of the easy and cheap floppies that we used to take photos for newsletters, our first school website (that I built), and even to use for our yearbook. If you take my school yearbooks from 99-01 99% of the photos were all taken by that Sony Camera. I carried at least a pack of 50 in my camera bag for every event.

Ahh, the circus statue picture, how it warms the cockles of my heart

This brings some nice memories from the nineties. I would loved to have this printer so I could work with my digital cameras. Nice.

Hearing Clint's distinct yet accurate duke voice -- I am pretty sure it was him doing the duke voice on duke nukem forever online a while back.

“Briefly flip through every decade or so” - brutal and true assessment of what family photos are really worth

@nickwallette6201

7 ай бұрын

Photo albums are a time capsule. Best opened 30 years or more later. Practically worthless more than 1 week after they're taken, they start to rise in value exponentially every few decades.

4:12 That looks like it would be the best vintage window Air-conditioning unit ever!

This video made my floppy disc turn into a hard drive. Maximum nerdification achieved, loved this.

i own a mavica fd91 and fd95 and I even have the boxes and manuals for both and even some of the cables too!. I was genuinely surprised by how good the photo quality is on them. theyre such cool little cameras!

@krissyboo6148

7 ай бұрын

also anyone else notice the sound when clint presses the print button sounds like the ps3's sound when you try to eject a disk but theres no disk in there? or was it the ps4? anyway, you know what i mean.

Old sony stuff is such a joy. Such cool designs.

Even as a 35mm film camera enthusiast, who will regularly spend $16 for a roll of film and then $25 developing and scanning it at a lab, for a cost of $1.15 per photo, it's still crazy to me to think that just taking a picture wasn't free for so many decades. When I'm taking film pictures, I'm trying to compose art, it's not like just grabbing my phone and getting a picture for posterity. The idea that it was costly to recall images through photographs for just, the general everyday life we experience, it's crazy. Taking a photo being a free thing now makes it a shortcut for so much. Want to remember what this restaurant has on its menu? Picture. Forgot to take notes on the slide and the presenter is about to switch slides? photo. Want to record the odometer reading at the oil change you just did? photo. Your odometer hit a palendrome? photo to show your friends. If each of those cost $2 we wouldn't use them for everything like we do now.

@nsf001-3

7 ай бұрын

I kinda miss the "1 hour photo" days. The winding, the beep. It just felt really comfy. The modern practice of tapping a screen doesn't come close to the aesthetic of those old disposable cameras But anytime snapping is pretty convenient. I bet if a functional consumer-equivalent of QR codes existed in the 90s you'd have to take a picture of the pattern, develop it, mail it to the company, and wait for a response. Even less than 10 years after I worked at Walmart they've switched from scan guns to smart phones for reading the shelf labels Tangentially related: I remember when I was really into cinematography and video editing stuff I wanted to get one of those home camera negative scanners. I'd usually just resort to a flatbed scanner though

@ferretyluv

7 ай бұрын

Rolls of film and getting them developed were much cheaper back in the day.

I had a Fuji thermal printer around 2005. No floppy but had USB and SD. Printed to 4x6 sheets in a feeder tray. Used it a few times but it’s sat in a cupboard since.

my 1st professional job in IT was back in 99 and we had the FD mavica. I thought it was amazing back then. We used that camera for site surveys. Never had the printer, but it looks awesome and I would have been blown away.

I found a boxed complete Mavica in the redundant kit box at work in 2014.. I still have it. Still works.

I still have a cd based mavca cd1000 and i just took it on vacation this summer and shot nearly 200 photos with it and it still works perfectly and the photos it takes are good enough that u cant tell that they were taken on a over 20 years old camera as long as u dont try to zoom in

I never get bored of this channel. And that's quite a nice achievement, I would say 😂 LGR is the GOAT

As always. Us being men of similar age and homeschooled in the US, I always feel that nostalgia of a time I’ve known, but my family never was in a place to get this stuff. You get it and I support you. Thank you, Clint. I genuinely love the heck out of you and you make my day always. Keep it up!

The device itself has such a fantastic aesthetic. Would look right at home on the set of some kind of retro-futurist movie.

Thank you for including the floppy writing sound as the pictures saved. Nostalgia and all.

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Of course, it's a key part of the Mavica experience :)

Your glee is contagious.

The boss of the place where I worked back then (R.I.P. R.H.) loved the Mavica cameras, because he could just store the floppy discs and buy new ones withou needing to save the images on a hard drive. When he later upgraded to a camera with a memory card, he continued on to buying a new memory card after every vacation trip and stored the old one. Bless his heart :)

Not going to lie, I love that 80s/90s vibe the pictures give.

That's literally spectacular. Really nice print quality, and I remember using my school library's Mavica back in the day. It was very cool.

That's much better quality than i expected. Would've loved to have that back in the day.

I bet your bro really loves these types of videos from you! Early digital photography is very cool.

I bought a lot of 9 mavica cameras off a guy a month or two ago, he still had some of the paperwork intact including a booklet advertising accessories for the later models that could use memory stick. It had lenses, tripods, even an add on that would turn the screen into a viewfinder. And this printer! I had assumed none of this actually came out, but it’s fun that it did!

"Why? Why not it's awesome!" I miss this style of technology.

This is the coolest thing i have seen on LGR yet!!!

The colors! Fantastic saturation and contrast. It actually looks better than current budget inkjet printers do; even when using photo paper. I'm not for sure if it says more about the Mavica printer, or the printer racket in general (which is an absolute racket).

@MrDuncl

7 ай бұрын

Dye-sub prints are usually good. They are what the instant print kiosks in places like chemists use. I found that out when one ran out of paper when I was printing about 100 photos on it and a store assistant had to load more in. The only major difference to home printers was that the paper was on a roll

Watching from the middle of the San Francisco Bay. LGR is still great at sea!

the quality of the pics look like something you'd find in a magazine back in the 90s

That color quality is impressive can you imagine doing that in 1999 people would be shocked to see you printing glossy images like that at home.

@himbourbanist

6 ай бұрын

the depth is incredible, I remember printing shit out on printer paper and it looked like shit

16:51 - I genuinely thought that was LGR's impression for a brief moment; he does it so good!

Like you said, it would make a great KZread short. And yet, definitely deserving of 20+ mins of coverage. The video capture was a "killer feature."

Well this was a blast from the past. Used that Sony digital cam a bunch in Grade 7, ~2003. Sports day photography comes to mind in-particular. I don't remember any prints being made (Although it's possible). We did make a slideshow that was then presented at an assembly iirc

Interesting to hear the PS 'Beeps' with something before they were used for the PS; and they've stuck with them all these years later!🎵

had one of those old floppy sony cameras at my job years ago. you including the little writing to disk sound when you were taking pictures made me smile :)

Amazing, thoroughly done video, of a beautiful product hitting all the right buttons as you said, printing, floppies, graphics, 90's, Mavica... Just very special overall!!

A simple printing alternative! Just needs a TV lol.

4:26 - it is the same device they have in The Ring when Rachel visits the video editing place to print out stills from the tape! Look up the scene, it's on YT, "the ring fly scene". This is an awesome little device, pretty expensive but if I had one I'd have printed everything I had back then! I used to love taking pictures of everything with my little compact camera. 13:47 - the beeping is the same or very similar to what a PS3 does when you press the eject button but there's no disk inside :) 15:14 - this is an amazing way to take screenshots of video games, I wonder how many magazines used this (if any) for their screenshots! My mind is blown!

I wish i was born during this era of tech cause it would've been really cool to grow up with! And to think this kinda stuff even existed back then is amazing!

It would be cool to take screenshots of games back then with this.

I’m glad to have another addition to Sony Mavica content on this channel!

I'm so glad you've uploaded and printed a high resolution modern image as well, to check the absolute best quality the printer can manage! Top-notch work, thank you!

What a coincidence you showed this! I was just looking over the maual in my mavica (the FD-83 shown at 5:23) and out falls a paper with a list of all the accessories you could get for it and I saw this printer and thought "wow that's so cool, but how many were actually sold?" Well, heres a video on this exact device

[gentle floppy disk noises, gentler jazz music]

Hello Mr LGR. I have been enjoying your videos for a few years now and I decided that today was a good day to tell you to keep up this fascinating niche of older computing machines. Best of luck to you!

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Thank you, I appreciate that and hope you continue to enjoy the show!

The beeps it makes sound very similar to the playstation 3 sounds when you power it on. That is awesome.

Getting John St John in as a guest, amazing!

Those Mavicas were amazingly good cameras for the time, and that printer does them justice. I would have gladly owned (and used) both of those back in the day.

16:45 Oh man, sticking stuff to CRTs using static. I don't know why I forgot about that.

"Sony Mavicas accounted for up to 40% of the entire US digital camera market at their peak"? Holy crap! I had no idea they were that popular, I thought they were fairly niche devices

Very impressed by the quality of those prints!

My Dad actually gifted me one of those mavica digital cameras when I was a kid. He received it either from someone he knew at Sony, or a distributor (I'm not really sure which. The only caveat was that I was asked to write a short review of the features and UI. The quality of course wasn't up to the same standards as the 35mm SLRs I owned at the time (Or even some of the point and shoots for that matter) but it was a fun toy, and the ability to instantly view the photo you had taken was mind blowing for someone who grew up having to wait for a roll of film to be developed and pray that the one shot I had really wanted turned out well.

My local mall in 2000 had one of these set up at a kiosk so anyone could just print out floppy disk pictures for a few cents, as a way to generate foot traffic. I only used it a few times for school work, but I appreciated that back then as it wasn't yet the era of cheap thumb drives for students. It was fun, but limited in use and time, but it was neat.

Wonderful! That dye sublimation process always gives pleasing results. The Sony UP-5000 you briefly showed is an absolute beast, if you get a chance to pick one up, go for it! (I used to repair them)

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Yeah that's a monster that I'd find it hard to say no to! 8 1/4" x 5 3/4" prints is awesome.

I like how u don’t beg for patreon followers, solid channel

I remember using those floppy disk Mavicas in high school. Later I bought a CD Mavica digital camera. It would burn to CD-Rs or RWs. Pretty wild tech. Had pretty good image quality for the 2002-2003 timeframe as well.

I love that you have used that Sony camera in a few of your vids. That was one of my favorite things to take with me on family road trips. My dad won it at work for a Xmas raffle. My mom probably threw it away by now

The Screenshot feature is weirdly cool when you remember that gaming magazines at the time this released (or maybe just a couple years before) were still taking fuzzy photos of CRT's with a camera for screenshots. Even in advertisments.

Never seen one of these, but back in the late 90's i used to run my PS through my VCR and record what i was playing 😀. Fun memories indeed.

@maroon9273

6 ай бұрын

90s and 00s were a great tech product decades.

We *still* use Sony thermal printers for medical purposes (usually Ultrasound images.) Printing straight from the printer is actually totally still possible, so it works largely the same (freezing the live image to immediately print it) And it still uses thermal paper! Thanks for another wonderful video!

The quality of this printer is actually amazing. Wouldn't expect something as good from the timeframe/technology

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Especially not with using old stock thermal cartridges that are twenty-ish years old!

Seeing you talk about photo printers makes me hope you consider covering different types of Zink printers. I have an old Polaroid Pogo that still works and it's still a ton of fun to use even today. Even if it needs to be plugged into a wall due to the proprietary battery being bad

@LGR

7 ай бұрын

Something I'd actually love to cover is the Polaroid i-Zone, which functioned as sort of a predecessor to Zink cameras. Unfortunately can't source _any_ of the film anymore and all of the old stock stuff is long expired!

@FluffySakii

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR I had one of those and they were so much to use. My parents showed me photos I took of my family dog surrounded in the bright colored tabs a year or two ago

@MrDuncl

7 ай бұрын

@@LGR That is the great thing about Dye-Sub. The Canon "Ink" and Paper I am currently using without any problems was originally bought in a shop that went bust 11 years ago so must be older than that.

I didn't have the printer but in 2000 I had a Sony Mavica Camera ;) Oh the memories...

It's like the perfect teleshopping video we've never had. I know it's old but I want to buy it.

the "looks like it's time to kill" at 16:51 sounded so much like Clint's voice that I didn't realize it wasn't 😂 Clint has played too much Duke Nukem