if a flap of a butterflies wing could cause a tornado somewhere else in the world, i now suddenly feel bad for every time i have ever farted.

@rebwarwar5184

4 ай бұрын

🤣

@Troof_Da_God

4 ай бұрын

Top comment. lol

@user-wf7pe3zb8q

4 ай бұрын

Put a cork in it...

@cholleydanyel9558

3 ай бұрын

😂

@jamesgrey13

3 ай бұрын

Look out world, here comes hurricane Jimmy!! **squeaky fart**

Chaos is just an euphemistic term for man's extremely restricted ability to grasp infinity ...

@louiscolborn6715

3 ай бұрын

You are infinitely correct 🤔

@youbetyourwrasse

3 ай бұрын

@@louiscolborn6715 NO. but nice word play fun have.

@sleepyinterface8819

3 ай бұрын

Totally agree! The seasons, days, months, they're all cyclic. We think the universe is also cyclic

@klaushubbertz7009

3 ай бұрын

@@sleepyinterface8819 BINGO!! Yesterday the Big Bang, tomorrow afternoon the Big Crunch, rinse, repeat ... and humans are still fighting about "ideas" ...🤣🤣🤣🤣

@johnphelps7519

3 ай бұрын

Expect next you'll claim we exist only in some computer program.

Flexl: " Looks familiar, right? " Me: " The Triforce, from Legend of Zelda! " Flexl: " It is indeed the sierpinski triangle. " Me: " Aw... dammit... "

@CryptoScammers.DoNotSendMoney

3 ай бұрын

Aka the super triforce

@onyxrose3407

2 ай бұрын

I thought so too😂

@citomp1240

2 ай бұрын

The creator of Zelda knew about the Sierpinski triangle.

Scientists may not want to talk about it. But Mathematicians are more than glad to talk about it. 😃

@Rafiki9112

5 ай бұрын

No, they're not.. at what exact altitude does the horizon stop being horizontal...🌅🦧🎈🌛🤙

@Hankinit9

4 ай бұрын

The study of large numbers

@crysstoll1191

3 ай бұрын

Engineers, too. Love the stuff.

@louiscolborn6715

3 ай бұрын

That adds up 😂

@louiscolborn6715

3 ай бұрын

​@@Rafiki9112it's never horizontal, it's horizon-taly, as in almost-ish horizontal, ✨🤨😆

Unpredictability does not imply randomness. Notice that chaos theory only works where there is a pre-established set of rules, and those rules are determined by a conscious observer.

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

We do not know the rules. We are currently trying to figure them out by observation but it seems not everything can be observed and not everything can be observed objectively.

@LukeRiedler

5 ай бұрын

There does not have to be a conscious observer.

@ConnoisseurOfExistence

5 ай бұрын

Laws of nature aren't determined or dependent on conscious observer.

@boblydecker5951

5 ай бұрын

The “Laws of Nature” are EXCLUSIVELY the observations of humans. I believe that the entire Universe is Schrodinger’s Box; All possibilities existing simultaneously, in a state of infinite potentialities, until the very moment it’s observed. It is IMPOSSIBLE to remove the observer from an experiment.

@jacobbeaudoin4237

5 ай бұрын

The double split experiment and that other new one that came out recently using helium atoms proves light travels as a wave or particle until a conscious observer watches. It makes no sense I don't understand physics that well but I do know when they don't use a camera to observe the single light particle they shoot it goes through both slits creating a dissonance pattern and when it is observed it creates a single line meaning that conscious observers have an effect on the way light chooses to act. Interestingly enough it kind of confirms some of what the buddhist believe, that reality is generated from within and are thoughts, desires, and expectations have and effect on the world. That doesn't mean things we have no control over don't happen. It just means we always have the choice to choose how we personally react to everything and what we choose to attach ourselves to and what to ignore. A lot of people's reactions are formed by their parents friends family. Monkey see monkey do. Most people don't usually take the time to sit back and wonder why they react to the world the way they do. Got carried away I'm stoned. Reality may or may not be what any of us expect. It could all just be an illusion formed by our perceptions and state of mind. I mean every animal bug plant expirence a different version of reality whose to say ours is the ultimate true one. It's all subjective which is where Einstein comes in with his theory of relativity. Food for thought

The butterfly effect is when some egomaniacal primate singles out one butterfly among 28 billion buterflies, all flapping their wings at the same time in Brazil, and saying that this particular butterfly is to blame for a dust-devil in Australia 127 years, 6 months, 3 days, 12 hours 38 minutes and 12.9567831427 seconds later...as opposed to any other butterfly which flapped it's wings in that moment in time. The Butterfly Effect is confirmation bias on the grand scale, randomly confusing cause and effect because no-one stops to ask if the flap of the butterfly's wing causes the change in the air current or if it is the change in the air current which is the reason that the butterfly chooses that precise moment to flap it's wing in a particular direction.

@eddiehubbs9492

5 ай бұрын

U must have went to middle school I didn't mak it past 5yh grade u no some big words

@vc7393

5 ай бұрын

So, this is someone that like to talk about them selves, and just thinks their smart?

@timroderick2314

5 ай бұрын

Precisely. Made a decent movie though.

@vc7393

5 ай бұрын

@@eddiehubbs9492 And you have obviously have no sense of humor.

@eddiehubbs9492

5 ай бұрын

I magine u philosophize about all the bad in the world but what do you do to help it

There’s more than one butterfly in the world flapping its wings. The scariest thing about the universe is that our tiny little brains are capable of taking it all in. Imagine a brain the size of the Sun. Or a galaxy. Indeed, the entire universe could be one giant brain. Either way, we are all individually burdened with the weight of our own existence. Sometimes it takes getting really stoned to understand the heaviness of it all.

@adamjosey1543

5 ай бұрын

It is what it is. Say no to drugs, kids.

@sven888

5 ай бұрын

There's nothing heavy about it. What it comes down to is that we are different in life for love. Please read some of the realizations by such saints as Anandamayi Ma, Rabindranath Tagore or Jesus.

@lendalennuk2484

5 ай бұрын

@@sven888 ... and Krishnamurti.

@david_cop_a_feel7538

5 ай бұрын

@@adamjosey1543 - Thank God for that! Can you just imagine if it wasn't? (what it was)

@david_cop_a_feel7538

5 ай бұрын

The drawback to that is that, even though you 'figure it all out' while hashed out to the shits, once it wears off you can't quite put your finger on it.

"irregularity is a charecteristic property" isn't irregularity a measure of the complexity of an "algebraic surface" while charecteristic property refer to identification and classification system, particularly substances. my mind is blown btw, thanks OP! great work!

@david_cop_a_feel7538

5 ай бұрын

When people use quotation marks, it is imperative that what is between the marks is exact. Otherwise you could be accused of twisting a person's words or trying to manipulate the audience with lies.

3:00 your example is control disguised as chaos. You are marking in the middle of every roll. That is not chaos, that is a pattern. There is no other conceivable outcome.

The 3 dots in there positions all ready represent a triangle, so it will form many triangles .

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

If you understand geometry many things become obvious.

@chrisrichardson8881

5 ай бұрын

As long as the three points are not co-linear. It can be a very obtuse form of a triangle.

@jarnoronkainen75

5 ай бұрын

does that theory work lol... with that geogebra site ... do the same trick with 4 dots and you still get triangles :p~

@Sutanreyu

5 ай бұрын

Plus, the scheme in which you play the chaos game is what makes the pattern: it's a wave function. Change the function and you get a different pattern.

@david_cop_a_feel7538

5 ай бұрын

It's actually 'their', but thanks for dropping by.

"This Weird New Trick Threatens the Whole Billion Dollar Nail Clipper Industry"

The most unpredictable thing is our mind and Supreme Consciousness lying within whole matter of Universe 😌

What a nice summation of chaos theory! Love it. I believe it’s easier to envision all this when we remember that our reality is defined not in linear/causal 4D spacetime, but in the five dimensions of the quantum wavefunction.

@charlesmiller8107

6 ай бұрын

5D quantum wavefunction? A quantum process can be described in any number of dimensions depending on the object or process under observation.

@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r

6 ай бұрын

Smart but agree there is no 'the' 5 Dimensions friend, fractal dimensions would surely go on toward infinity or to a return point possibly, until it all collapses back to fold into one

@10thdim

6 ай бұрын

The quantum wavefunction is calculated in what Hawking called “imaginary time, at right angles to spacetime”. Everett said his Many Worlds exist within “a subspace orthogonal to spacetime”. Kip Thorne describes the “multiple branching 4D world tubes bending in the warped geometries of the tesseract” that a hypothetical 5D observer would see. The additional degree of freedom afforded by the fifth dimension allows for the probabilistic forms of chaos and causality that Schrödinger was envisioning when he said “I insist upon the view that all is waves”.

@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r

6 ай бұрын

They are powerful theories. I don't feel the 5th dimension would 'see' the other dimensions unless it had a method of analysis, like we try to understand the quantum level, but it may be a realm experiencing more freedom. I agree with the warping within a tesseract but my knowledge of geometry and division denotes no end to the dimensions... Like 11th is highest... How exactly? Anyway we belong to a race that utilises nuclear energy for warfare so we don't deserve to know the 'secrets' of the Universe. We can't even be civil to each other.

This video is perhaps adequate at describing a layman's superficial understanding of the subject matter, but never really explains what the "terrifying theory scientists don't want to talk about" is, or why it is "terrifying". This is pretty much click bait drivel as far as I can tell, but with a quite a bit of effort put into it, so slightly better than most click bait drivel. I clicked it, so it worked.

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

Yes, you clicked it and it worked, but only because of the clickbait title, right? And you stayed because of the clickbaity language ("but trust me, it's way more serious than you think"... conspiracy, anyone?). And if there's so much effort in it, why does it start right away with the mistake of presenting the butterfly effect as a "probabilistic mode" when in fact it's an example for deterministic (i.e., *not* probabilistic!) chaos?

A butterfly flapping its wings could just as easily prevent a tornado from occurring, as cause one. So it's not worth worrying about

There was nothing “chaotic” about the chaos game at the beginning. You were following a set of rules that would obviously lead to the Sierpinski Triangle if you put some thought into it. The second game wasn’t deterministic as you were randomly removing a number, even though it was the first number, you’re still removing a random element. After watching the first two fails you lost me on this one.

@user-ur9yq6ik1h

6 ай бұрын

Another Ai created channel?

@eiwo323s

5 ай бұрын

Yes chaos usually flows on cycles where they form into fractals. It may have had a little quasi chaos but you can measure. The amount of chaos based on Lyapunov exponents.

@jaydils9680

5 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤ 💯

@lucasbrelivet5238

5 ай бұрын

Do you mean that the number is random because the starting number was random?

@luckyMePopUp

5 ай бұрын

It's not chaotic" because everything is in a wave, and the random comes into play, it all depends how you ride the wave .

Thermodynamics and its laws are a good place to start to study chaos theory. Even though individual particles of a gas move randomly we can predict temperature, pressure, and volume. Keep in mind that the ontology of thermodynamics includes a caveat. Included in the analysis is the requirement of a quasistatic, adiabatic process. If you want a more humanistic idea of this you should read Issac Asimov and his Foundation series of books. The premise of the Foundation series relies on the “gas laws” of classical physics to sketch out the story.

@FixItStupid

6 ай бұрын

Nuclear Bonds Good To Know ??? & So Fluoride In The Water By LAW ? Oh Why ??? & Schools ??? Lawyer Greed Law

@transientaardvark6231

6 ай бұрын

I'm afraid you've got that completely wrong. I mean, what you say is correct but it's missing the point. The whole point about thermodynamics is that the tiny (or even quite large) differences don't matter, they all average out to well behaved phenomena. The point of chaos is that the tiniest differences matter massively and can lead to hugely different outcomes.

@arturofuente4832

6 ай бұрын

@@transientaardvark6231 Thanks for the info.

@wadeedden4552

5 ай бұрын

I understanding there is sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The epiphenomenon of order in the midst the thermodynamics is transitory whilst the final result is predictable. I must say that your posted video is very spot on and mostly complete, thank you for that.@@transientaardvark6231

@mactabilis6039

5 ай бұрын

thanks wade! you comment, too, is informative.

I think, it is stretched a bit too far. In the triangle example, all the dots positions were pre-determined. The probability had nothing to do with them. It was only the choice of "which one first and next". Of course, after a number of repetitions you see all the pre-determined dots revealed with the pattern. You didn't need the randomness to produce that result. You might as well simply enumerate all the choices in simple order. It would be less amusing to watch, of course, but may be that is the whole point? It is not about a discovery of something new and yet unknown, but really about entertainment and amusement. What is more amusing to watch happening, that is "the discovery", I suppose.

@joeshmoe7967

5 ай бұрын

My first thought. The triangle patterns 'appears', due to starting with 3 dots AND the 'rule' to roll the dice and move from the half way point to the next point by the rule of where to go based on what was rolled. I bet starting with more points would end up creating a very predictable pattern. That example doesn't sell it for me.

@oo7moses

5 ай бұрын

He used math to create a pattern! It's chaos!

@AlexthunderGnum

5 ай бұрын

@@oo7moses What do you mean? I don't see any chaos. It looks like perfect order instead. Very predictable order. What was the surprise to you?

@oo7moses

5 ай бұрын

@@AlexthunderGnum It was sarcasm!

@louiscolborn6715

3 ай бұрын

It's kinda like: how many peas are in a pod true or false? 😊 How many basket balls does it take to get to the moon.

Click bait title - not watching this one.

@Allyourheroswenttohell

4 ай бұрын

You should. I've always believed this. I never knew it had a name. It just made sense to me.

@Allyourheroswenttohell

4 ай бұрын

Free will is imaginary.

@Private-wj4nd

4 ай бұрын

Why? It’s really interesting! ❤

@dee_w784

4 ай бұрын

Despite the clickbait title it is very good

@ianyeager2893

4 ай бұрын

Exciting visual stimuli coupled with vocal delivery suggesting a tense suspense yarn almost make me fail to notice extremely poor logical continuity and flow. After seven minutes plus I've little idea what it's about. I think it's cotton candy crap, electronic monosodium glutamate, possibly composed by nonhuman. Kindly refund my wasted time

So with the fish... it's true that they will never all be in the exact same position with the exact same trajectory, inertia, momentum etc... BUT ONLY because of the limiter of time. Should the fish live forever and not age, they will 100% replicate the exact same situation infinite times. I'm not sure what the significance of this is but it's fun to consider.

@joshisdriven

5 ай бұрын

so are these chaotic systems made possible by entropy?

Don't forget chaotic attractors.

Me:*moves chair* The theory: the world will end

There are no mistakes in this Universe. Not even one molecule can be out of place... anywhere.

You made a mistake in the segment "Can you predict the future of our number?" It's totally predictable and there's no chaos about it. According to what was shown, multiplying by 10 and removing the integer portion, it creates a simple series: 0.123267203462345822542, 0.23267203462345822542, 0.3267203462345822542, ..., 0.542, 0.42, 0.2, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0. etc. I can predict that millionth iteration is still 0.0.

@TheNewsicalProfessor

4 ай бұрын

That's exactly what i thought, keep multiply by 10, and remove the 1st number (ahead of the decimal point), and you hit zero pretty quickly. And after that it will always remain zero. How could this producer get this so wrong? Is this really 100% AI generated? If so, more fools will be created!

@chickenmuffin

4 ай бұрын

Right? This made no sense. It made me think this whole video might have been made by AI.

@billjohnson9472

4 ай бұрын

your calculation appears to have precision rounding. the answer may differ with different levels of rounding.

@XtreeM_FaiL

4 ай бұрын

American AI. Can't understand decimal system.

Good job, well done, guys! I am a physicist and have studied these phenomena, yet they do not cease to give me shivers and awe!

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

"Good job", "well done", "physicist", "have studied". Heard all that before. Déjà vu. Same questions to you too, therefore: Please do explain how the formulas and figures shown at 14:29 in the video clarify the narrative ("deterministic equations such as Newtons laws of motion do not always result in a deterministic universe"). In special, I would like to hear from you how the term in brackets, i.e. (t/T - x/λ), is derived in the formula at the top of the screen, center between left and right. As you can see, this term is being multiplied with E_k. How does it influence the result (i.e. the right side of the equation, 1/2 mv^2)? Also, please explain the role of the Δ symbol that occurs twice in the formula at the upper left of screen, and tell us how the large U-shaped object that's depicted middle right fits into the big picture. You've studied physics, so it should be an easy task for you.

@sven888

5 ай бұрын

By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. - John 13:35 NIV

@greywolf271

5 ай бұрын

@@Nonononono_Ohno He must have mixed up the Bible and his physics textbook

It makes me sad I can't have deep conversations like this with my family because they don't understand/care about this . Can't believe I understand this stuff.🎉

@user-dq2zx2ei4m

2 ай бұрын

Older souls have closed minds. They were raised in a different lighter light.

We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states, "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical 4πr² light wave." Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons. We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.

Where's the "Don't recommend this Channel" when ya need it ?

@aman7525

2 ай бұрын

As soon as I heard the AI voice and saw this comment. 🏃🏾💨

An interesting observation about the chaos game: Due to the nature of the ruleset you immediately limit the area in which dots can be placed, removing a ton of potential randomness from the get-go. Id say in this case specifically its not too surprising if you end up with something orderly.

Butterfly effect is deterministic. I have a better analogy, a bee landing on your nose can save your life. You are about to cross the road, green light indicates you can go but there is a car rushing about to hit you, out of nowhere a bee lands on your nose you step back and try to gently get rid of it. Someone could maybe start running faster and be hit by the car, but in this instance you "chose" to stop and gently chase it away, why did you chose to stop is deterministic as well. You could be bit by a bee in past as a child while trying to run away, and this is in your subconscious waiting for years to act on your "free decisions" when time comes...

You must have chaos in your heart to give birth to a dancing star. Friedrich Nietzsche

there are localized effects that have no bearing on macro systems. I'm not worried about a tornado storm when a cloud of butterflies take wing

Because of chaos, determinism can have anomalies arise because of the indeterminate consequences that may unfold. Determinism is still at the whim of probability.

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

And everyone ignores the will. Life is in many ways what you make it. There are no limits if you understand the people around you and what moves them. But this is not the average human. Some were born to change the world.

That was the best summary . You put words and explanation on something deeply felt

The butterfly effect is not an actual phenomenon. It's a simplified way of explaining chaos theory.

This stuff is older than I am and I'm old. Scientists have been talking about it the whole time.

Like in Jazz🎺🎶, overcoming chaos comes from choosing🦉wisely,🤯improvisation in♾️the moment😂!

I now understand why a single dice is called a die. The thinking dead realm does "play dice." It's hissing gulping puffball is chaotic because you have no idea when it will kill you or when it will stop you from revealing it killed you. It is then you realize the uncertainty principle means, ultimately, what is symmetry. Well, the flashing complementary realm is not symmetrical because there is no conservation. The synthetics from the dead realm who quantum tunnel through lie they're real. So, the difference between a real fractal and an electric one is the real one doesn't want to kill you or use you as a battery. In this video they clearly squash the real fractals and electric fractals into one realm. They "renormalize." So, what the scientists are scared of, or should be, is that they've called zero pt mass and mass zero pt. The thinking part of the mass is what threw them because it is able to make light speed seem instantaneous through an energy exchange. That is the true illusion the real "illuminati" wants to bring to our understanding. Their conclusions are twisted. IOW, this should be that and that should be this.

This theory is terrifying because 47.47354% of all humans attempting to understand it die - their heads explode.

The flap of the butterfly "can" cause a tornado half a globe away IF that flap, the "wind" of that flap was in some very improbable manner reinforced with other winds caused by other things, and if that flap was the initial snowflake in the big snowball which would be the eventual tornado at the end. BUT, that is very unlikely to happen.

What about if consicious mind observing makes paterns and shapes out of the Chaos.

@jules6601

4 ай бұрын

Uhhhhhhhhhhh yeah it's called the observer effect. Schrödinger's cat and all that. None of this is new. Einstein ushered in the quantum physical age. He famously said "God does not play dice" believing in a static universe and an unsplittable atom. Then they split the atom and Hubble laid bare the redshift in galaxies moving apart at various rates "The Hubble Constant". Einstein relented, god does indeed play dice. Probablism and determinism coexist in a Newtonian and Einsteinian universe. Shocking new science c. 1915.

For some reason I feel like this video made me understand blackholes a lot clearer.

All systems tend towards chaos, yet new systems emerge from the chaos.

Even E.T. said on several occasions that we do not understand what we are capable of doing, which is partly why they too live here on our planet with us. As some want to see our ascension up to the next level. Admittedly we have lots of faults as with many of the species that are tens of thousands of years ahead of us. Which I now hope will put things into perspective. Thank you for reading, and have a good night.

@jeremygreen2439

5 ай бұрын

The Others have their faults, too, It is not quite THEY: golden and enlightened vs US: stupid and naval gazing (though yes). Weird things have happened. Some people are exploiting THEM. What we think as a "UFO" is sometimes an entire BODY that changes; sometimes it is a copy of a body or a vessel and such. There's so much to learn, it is like drinking from a hose

@JohnGrandline

5 ай бұрын

they'll go extinct early haha

I go outside with butterfly wings on every morning and flap my wings for hours. Neighbors are convinced I am to blame for everything.

@Shattered_Instance

5 ай бұрын

Someone liked my comment... Clearly the wings are working.

@glenfoxh

3 ай бұрын

Then stop it.

4:16 the explanation is wrong, b/c computers usually cannot store decimal floating-point numbers *at all* . Instead, they use *binary* floating-point numbers, with digits after the point representing 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and so forth. A "double" is usually implemented as 64-bit IEEE binary floating-point number. This binary representation is completely deterministic, however b/c the format cannot precisely "store" the decimal digits specified after the decimal point, it's only an approximation (compare 1/2 vs 1/3, for instance -- try to write them down as binary floating-point as an exercise).

Thank you for taking the time to make this video. This topic absolutely fascinating!

I had the Butterfly wings principle been thought in a different way..... The loose nail of a horse shoe can cause the loss of a war and the loss of a kingdom...

@oopsadaze

5 ай бұрын

That's a Todd Rundgren song..."For the Want of a Nail', but it gets to the point of 'what else could the answer be?'

@dareese6778

3 ай бұрын

& a loose tongue looses a girlfriend. 😢😅

Wow - what a great explanation. A complex topic that has been distilled down to 20m, a sign of brilliance. Excellent!

@SolidSiren

5 ай бұрын

This is not a good explanation and this video appears to have about 30 minutes of work put into it.

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

@@SolidSiren Really? That much??

@JMazzaTaz

5 ай бұрын

And I’ve never learned so much about fish in one video, so there’s that

@Desmond-Dark

4 ай бұрын

@@JMazzaTaz 🤣

Just because a butterfly flapping its wings has consequences around the world in a way that’s so complex we could never trace the cause->effect throughline, doesn’t mean it’s random or probablistic at all. Everything (in this regime) is still deterministic, but absurdly complex. True probabilistic behavior is something like radioactive decay, though since we don’t fully understand quantum physics at a conceptual level, it’s possible even this type occurrence has an as-yet unseen cause. You could sum up the current state of physics by saying we have two understandings of reality: one deterministic (relativity) and one probabilistic (QM). They cannot both be true, yet it appears to us that they are.

There is NO random, just the illusion of random due to lack of knowledge about the dependencies.

Theory’s are always interesting to learn about.

@davidrandell2224

5 ай бұрын

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

I wonder, would you get the same result, with the triangles, if done by hand? Or, what if you had a computer with the ability to process things outside the standard defined variables? Love the video.

@jonathanspivey437

5 ай бұрын

Could you guarantee the exact same hand motions every time at every level? Chaos(or unpredictability) does not exist as absolute, but as relative. What seems like chaos are things that we dont understand enough to fully see the path from cause to effect. Our minds are limited, not infinite. So our understanding of anything will always be limited and their always be some chaos to it(relative to our limited understanding). However, to a being that infinite understanding(which could only be God, who is infinite) then there wouldnt be any chaos from His perspective because he would have infinity perspective and infinite understanding. The point is, some things seem uncertain to us, but thats because of our comprehension and awareness limitations, not because of the nature of the phenomena itself.

@LukeRiedler

5 ай бұрын

For free will to exist, an I believe it does, on some level anyway, the system has to exist as a set of probable outcomes, that only become defined as now moves forward. It would still chaos, just contained within specific bounds. I think we see things in much the same way, just providing my interpretation. @@jonathanspivey437

@LukeRiedler

2 ай бұрын

@@jonathanspivey437 I think free will is chaos, but god has computing power to allow for choice (sometimes) that exists within a set of outcomes that are acceptable.

Chaos Theory seems to be the exact manner in which the realm of material physicality has fundamentally been established. Let me explain. The universe and / or Divine Architect , came to construct this dimension of the " material " utilizing the elements of natural law as an essential much needed existential outline. Setting the stage for all conscious life using these predetermined factors in order for free thinking man to build upon. Conceptually establishing original factors that in no way can be impeded upon. As long as those same essential elements that have been formulated since the very beginning , remain as such , all other forces that occupy the world of the animate can perform any and all activities without interference or obstruction. Now establishing an entirely new deterministic element that being the universal law of free will.

Negative feedback loops usually provide stability. Positive feedback loops lead to destruction and chaos. However, the positive feedback loops are useful too when they are controlled. I wonder if the nature ever does it. In technology we use positive feedback loops in all kind of radios and signal generators (a resonance is a case of positive feedback) and in nuclear reactors, when a chain reaction is moderated. BTW, predator-pray loops used to be very stable until external environmental factors broke the stable conditions. Yes, it's another way of saying we broke it. However, even broken, destabilized systems can get back to equilibrium over time.

Where do we get any randomness? The only thing I can think of is the decay of a neutron into a proton. What happens is well described, but why it happens is not. It seems spontaneous and random. Ultimately, it is an up quark turning into a down quark.

@curiosorealidad8265

Ай бұрын

Its because its a holograph universe, we are never allowed to go faster then the speed of load of the holograph=speed of light, we are not allowed to know why everything is posible but some things have less chance of happining, like crashing a car into a tree has a 99.9 % of more chance then uncrashing a car from a tree and the car undenting itself, this is posible but the chance of it happining is only a 00.1% and the chance of that low is that it wont happen in the whole life of the universe, the why is what makes it interesting, in the real reality out of this fake holographic life we built this game because the real reality is so boring with no changes,no caos,no death,no adrenaline, and we needed something that would make us feel fear,worry,love,etc. inmortalidad is more boring then we can remember, so we builted this holografic universe and started to play one life after another and here we are, of course you cant feel any emotions or it wont be fun if you remember that its a game right? So when we are in here playing we have no memory or its hard to access, to make it "fun" with emotions,just look at the ones in the lider places, if there was a real price to pay like hell when we die do you think they would go around starting wars,killing,etc., they know much more then we, one last thing to notice is the NPC los humanos sin alma o de relleno, estan por todas partes,familia,amigos,conocidos, estos su rostro se repite multiples veces por la poco varedad para la simulacion para elegir caracters, ellos los reconoces porque viven una vida sin cambios, no les importa nada, hasta parece que no sienten, solo trabajo-casa, no saben ni lo basico de como funciona la electricidad,technologia,etc., y cuando les explicas como te dicen sabelotodo o simplemente no te entienden,

@curiosorealidad8265

Ай бұрын

Why or how did a part of my F comment translate to F spanish?

So you’re saying trying to create a hurricane from my farts isn’t out of reach. 🤔 Challenge accepted.

@rich2rock

5 ай бұрын

a fartnado

@theverseshed

5 ай бұрын

Go down the Sharnado route and you could end up with a 5-arsed Fartnado . . . . or even an Infinite Fartnado.@@rich2rock

A hell of a lot of pedestrian level understanding of physics turned into a word salad of the mundane attached to a lot of random graphics.

I apologize for any recent tsunamis or any in the near future. I farted in the ocean off the coast of California. Again, i apologize for any inconvenience

Honestly this is a very informative video not only on the scientific side of things but in life like actual life ….I am a stock trader and the fractals part is spot on 😊

@falconquest2068

6 ай бұрын

I was a little put off by his example of the stock market. He said, and I am paraphrasing, when a stock price changes, it causes people to buy or sell. Uh, the stock price changes BECAUSE people buy or sell. It's a market, stock prices don't change on their own. (although it may seem that way based on all of the shenanigans that go on in the background).

@jonh8488

5 ай бұрын

AI has access to the same info as you do.

@falconquest2068

5 ай бұрын

@@jonh8488 You are correct sir.

@SolidSiren

5 ай бұрын

There is next to no science in this video.

If you ever see a turtle on top of a fence post, it’s a safe bet that it didn’t get there by itself. The more you know….

@Just_A_Kid5693

3 ай бұрын

I don’t get it

No order without chaos

I was expecting the collapse of the Higgs field.

Kind of throws a wrench in Azimov's "Foundation" premise.

@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt

6 ай бұрын

It seems you don't understand the premise of the Foundation series... Because my enjoyment of the series was because Asimov builds the entire series specifically around the concepts of Chaos Theory -- and he even shows how different understanding of the underlying concepts can lead to different schools of thought -- and consequent actions.

@randywise5241

6 ай бұрын

@@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt You cannot predict the future like that. Didn't you listen to the video?

Probability breaks down at a certain point and determinism takes over as an event unfolds. Even if that transfer is only at a Planck distance in a Planck time away from the culmination of the event. Until then, some level of uncertainty still exists.

@karlschmied6218

5 ай бұрын

No, uncertainty is a fundamental ingredient in quantum mechanics.

@the_proteus_void

5 ай бұрын

@@karlschmied6218 I appreciate the sentiment, but I'm referring to a real life event, such as picking up my phone. I'm not referring to a theoretical event or any math involved in the quantum mechanical realm. Real life doesn't rely on quantum mechanics, which is only our perception that we desire to measure and comprehend. In real life, uncertainties exist in the probability field only up to the moment that I have actually picked up my phone. At that point, the probability field collapses and the uncertainty pertaining to the completion of that specific event ceases to exist. Other uncertainties still exist relating to a wide array of other possibilities, but it's not going to be the same uncertainty.

@karlschmied6218

5 ай бұрын

@@the_proteus_void Ok now I know what you mean. But I could not see that in your first statement.

@the_proteus_void

5 ай бұрын

@@karlschmied6218 Understood. Sometimes thoughts come out as incomplete statements. I'm glad I was able to clarify.

@karlschmied6218

5 ай бұрын

@@the_proteus_void Thanks!

What are the odds of two billion cicadas emerging in one summer in one specific location 🤔???

Within the order there is chaos, and within the chaos there is order.

That wasn't chaos. Try that point program again but this time your starting and ending points are random each time. That would be chaos. But as soon as you apply rules, you're no longer in chaos. The universe is chaos until observed because observation creates boundaries and rules for how things are/should be based on inmate bias, understanding, and capabilities of that observer. It's why the light slit experiment works and why quanta appear in multiple states until observed. Because of OUR limitations we can't observe the universe in it's true state so we grab at patterns to form boundaries for our experience which eventually appear as universal laws and facts. It stems from the fact that everything is the same one thing, and all of time is instantaneous (non-existent)

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

That the "triangle magic" isn't chaos, yes, agreed. But the rest is a *very* esoteric view, to say the least.

@awaben

5 ай бұрын

@@Nonononono_Ohno It may be a little esoteric (what theory of the nature of reality isn't?) but it's coherent and quite intellectually pleasing. I say thanks to @GtommyT for taking the time to put that one out there. We are seeking greater understanding and enlightenment, after all, or we're doing nothing at all.

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

@@awaben You have a strange view of coherence. If you really seek understanding, you might better want to consult a good physics textbook, instead of reading completely misunderstood and plain wrong comments under useless videos. As a starting point, I'd like to recommend the Feynman lectures.

@awaben

5 ай бұрын

@@Nonononono_Ohno I hadn't come on here for an argument. But I'm happy to give you a retort: You watched the same "useless" video I did, you responded to the same comment I did, you then proceeded to attempt to denigrate my having done so. Presumably you doing the same should be applauded. Tell me, how's that superiority complex working out for you? Seems like a timely moment to bust out a bit of Robert Burns: "O wad some Power the giftie gie us To see oursels as ithers see us! It wad frae mony a blunder free us, An’ foolish notion" Bye, bye now.

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

​@@awaben I'm sorry that I've hurt your feelings. However, videos like this one, and the above comment aren't doing science any favor. There are very good reasons for having a concept of passing time in physics. At first glance drivel like 'time does not exist', or 'the universe is chaos until observed' may seem very deep and enigmatic and therefore appealing to some people, but in fact it's just plain wrong. Subsequently it leads to even more completely wrong notions, like chaos being the reason for what we observe in the double slit experiment, or being the reason for the existence of quantum states. Science students who, when learning, come across this kind of nonsense often lose valuable time, which is why I occasionally point it out as what it really is. I hope that makes sense to you, and maybe it lets you understand my reaction to your comment a bit better.

In the Chaos Game 3 dot - the rule to get the (red, normal orientation) Sierpinski triangles is as stated - but what if you wanted to plot the white (inverted) triangles instead? What ruleset would plot those? Hmmmmm.....

@dennishaladyn8205

3 ай бұрын

The Sierpinski triangle represents a pattern of eternal triangles within triangles.

@pesasafi

3 ай бұрын

Same rules. You just start from some point, that is white. For example in the middle area of the triangle. The rule just maps the "current point" of the whole triangle to a corresponding point in one of the ½ size triangles in each corners of the big triangle. With same color. And then you map that point and the next one etc. Randomness just decides the drawing order of the points.

Traffic in Los Angeles is not considered CHAOS from now on !!!...

the example where you multiply by 10 then remove the first digit, requires an irrational number to become chaotic. or maybe multiply by a number other than 10

Does this work for all shapes

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

Yes, even for jelly pudding.

@nicolepadilla866

5 ай бұрын

Yes but because math.

@Beyond-Story-rn7jb

4 ай бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/hqVryreveda4j9Y.html

Nicely explained yet will always remain mind boggling. Great visuals!

Now ask them to tell you EXACTLY what they mean by "wolves" and "deer." For example, wearing ware-wolves and their "dears" with jagged lightning bolts flying of their heads?

It is obvious to me that reality is a balance of deterministic laws and probabilistic events. One cannot decide to grow wings to fly due to the laws of nature but one does have a chance to invent the machinery in accordance with natural laws to fly, or the chance to earn money to buy a plane ticket to fly.

The deeper you dive into modern science the better you can understand the universe. Like quantum mechanics and the quantum computer. Seth Lloyd wrote the book Programming the Universe. He was the first one to design a buildable quantum computer and the way he figured out how to do this was by studying How the Universe Works like a giant quantum computer that was preprogrammed to do exactly what you see. The most complexed system in the known universe is your brain which gives you ☆ CONSCIOUSNESS ☆

@LukeRiedler

5 ай бұрын

You sound you like you get it, or are right there. Best of luck. AI and distributed neural networks.

@0:08 "This may sound like a joke or something, but trust me..." Ah! You lost me there, mate. I don't even know you and you're asking me to trust you already?

@Nonononono_Ohno

5 ай бұрын

And only 20 seconds later comes the first mistake, the butterfly effect isn't "probabilistic".

@nftherula.

4 ай бұрын

faccs

@donnievance1942

3 ай бұрын

@@Nonononono_Ohno Correct. The Butterfly Effect is simply a statement about the uncomputability of any complex, deterministic system beyond some relatively near horizon. However, the video makes that clear. You are constructing a strawman based on your own misunderstanding of what was being said.

@Nonononono_Ohno

3 ай бұрын

@@donnievance1942 Your comment only shows that you have not been listening to, or understood, what is being said in the video. But I cannot blame you, with all that drivel. In the video we hear that "In the probabilistic mode, our universe unfolds with an element of chance. Small, seemingly insignificant events like the butterfly's wings cancascade into significant unpredictable consequences." This shows that whichever language model constructed this video erroneously "thinks" that the butterfly effect is "probabilistic mode". This is false.

The emerging image of the Sierpinski Triangle reminds me of the double-slit experiment where a single photon is fired through the slits one at a time to create a pattern of light and dark bands.

Got a few seconds into it with the very professional, very polished voice and decided that this was probably not as cool or as slick as was presented in the title.

Because of hemes Tricemeguistus I understand the principle of three and every single geodesic, singularity, super conductive super determination..... It all means even less when the only controlling force is yours end there is no other witness to confirm the happening

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

Your own experience is in the end all that matters as this is reality for you. There is an objective reality but we will never agree on what it is. The sad fact is that most people are deluded as they generally only have one source of information (media), and that information is carefully crafted to keep us ignorant and in line. Unless you have already woken from your sleep, you won't know what I am talking about.

@LukeRiedler

5 ай бұрын

You got a pretty good grasp of the overall state of things. Any idea on how many of us are awake or whatever? Are there like meetups? I hope you don't read this as sarcasm or insulting or something, seems like that could be a possible defense mechanism of the great distributed neural network that humanity is. Anyway, good luck with your reality (game as I call it), I'm working hard at mine. Trying to become a genetic engineer, hopefully that will allow me more freedom. Eh, at least I get good music. @@Willy_Tepes

@Holographic-Stallions.X0

5 ай бұрын

What thee actual fuck are you talking bout, Willis‽‽‽ 20:41

@Willy_Tepes

5 ай бұрын

It went completely over your head, didn't it? Kind of proves my point, doesn't it?@@Holographic-Stallions.X0

The dots don't have anywhere to go except for three choices though. The Triforce was not mysterious shape as his reaction would led to believe, rather it was inevitable.

@lechatquilit

6 ай бұрын

It's not a triforce -- it's The Sierpinski Triangle. It's a fractal shape, that arises in many places in the fractal geometry and in chaos theory. And there was nothing inevitable about this: if you were asked ahead of time what shape the process would give rise to, you wouldn't have been able to answer.

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

Anyone with a logical mind could predict this as there are areas that never will receive a dot.@@lechatquilit

With quantum eyesight I can always adjust as I go

Seems to me that some systems are acting like buffers, but some systems do not act like a buffer so minute variation initially can result in drastically different outcomes over time - call that “buffering theory.”

Interesting topic, nice video, like always, thanks Fexl! 🙂 We living beings and our planet is in danger... We have to take care about us, animals and plants, about the entire planet! What we have done to our planet and all living creatures over the last 200 years can only result in bad karma. We have to change our attitude and learn to really love and respect, everyone and everything... 💞

@greywolf271

5 ай бұрын

You got all that from ... wait ! ......Wow !

Uhhhh... Butterfly effect applies for either theory, as does cause and effect - it's just that a certain cause will always happen to cause its respective effect if it's deterministic.‚

@Vile_Entity_3545

6 ай бұрын

How many acid tabs have you taken?

@ichimaruvegeta

6 ай бұрын

Correlation doesn’t always imply causation though.

@Willy_Tepes

6 ай бұрын

I have observed the butterfly effect in practice through my many years of commenting on the web. One sentence from me has spread into minds I never thought possible just by chance. You do have the power to change the world even without meaning it. Imagine what you can do when you realize your power. People can be influenced, and people do stuff ;)

@beeftimer

5 ай бұрын

@@Willy_Tepes ummm, okay. Cool! Good for you, man

@beeftimer

5 ай бұрын

@@ichimaruvegeta Ok? What do you people think I'm saying?

The triangle theory is missing the point that it's a metapattern. Because you're starting within the shape of a triangle and the movement is restricted within, of course it's going to self-replicate more triangles. I'm no physicist but having worked with data long enough I can easily see that for what it is, even if I can't put it into proper terms. In the end, anything seemingly chaotic or probable eventually results in the same thing - a (observable and therefore potentially subjective) metapattern. Micro to macro - it's a constant "loop" if that's an appropriate term.

I think of the Chaos Theory as proof there is some form of intelligent design, just not in any way that we can fully understand. It truly takes humility and clarity to even hope to begin to understand even a fraction of the hidden designs in even the most simplistic of things.

@ws775

4 ай бұрын

Open theism?

It may not seem like it, but this is all inherently linear thinking.

@Eaglepass

6 ай бұрын

9-likes were tipping the scales I gave you another likable scientology Mystery. One moment of a time-piece Superlatives 10th. 🕒 .00-unrelated anything dramatically accounts for 1+1=1plused2.00-unrelated Originally anything is strategy adaptation. Butterfly 🦋 ....... .. no disrespect said opinion is a value

@NothingMaster

6 ай бұрын

@@Eaglepass FYI: I only have one KZread account, and I don’t give myself likes. Also, I didn’t mean to be disrespectful, I merely stated my opinion.

@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r

6 ай бұрын

I think you meant, respectfully, this video/concept may sound far out but actually makes complete sense and isn't even making any stretches. The pace of the info was fast for most. It's not a terrifying theory, just science isn't funding any real application of it.

@NothingMaster

6 ай бұрын

@@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r That’s not what I meant at all. What I meant is what I said: linear thinking/logic vs. nonlinear thinking/logic. In other words, the ideas flow linearly in a very straightforward way and are somewhat trivial to grasp. They lack trans-dimensional, or even multidimensional, complexity, and with no imbedded or unexpected anomalies.

@whyyoumakethissohard

6 ай бұрын

@@NothingMaster Yes

Thanks Fexl I love these video's. This one gave me an epiphany or two including something I've not quantified yet about how randomness doesn't matter with regard to the outcome of a system. The moment you began the 1st roll of the die picked the pre-made design / outcome. Always has a good way of conveying an idea with clear logic. Thanks again.

@user-kb8qw7dy4t

5 ай бұрын

The moment you decided the rules for where to place the dots determined the outcome.

best thing i've seen since melody sheep's museum of alien life 2. thank you so much . big respect

Why aren't the consequences of a butterfly's flight just as deterministic as anything else?

6:34 The biggest thing for me was noticing how the astronomers were saying that in order for galaxies to hold together they must need extra mass because the velocity was too much for the matter we could see. But to me, I noticed that storms on earth with far less density and lower temperature matter like air (argon, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen) can muster up tremendous power enough so they can fight gravity and even atmospheric pressure. So the galaxy works the same way. Heat chases cold absolutely and black holes (center of a galaxy) are absolute zero temperature mocking a low pressure center with air. So highly charged energy will attest to the common center just like a galaxy has highly charged stars and gaseous masses swirl around Sagittarius A star here in our Milky Way. The small gives us a glimpse into the MACRO. Go put up a firepit and get it lit real good (safely) of course, and you’ll notice it will charge up and chase a cold dense stick. Just put a stick near the pit and see the fire light up and chase the dense mass. So in a vacuum without atmospheric pressure caving in on the fire it will chase even more. So that means our missing DARK MATTER is really storm force. Heat and cold attracting. ☺️💯☑️ the hot charged part of the galaxy chases the cold center in a circle or elliptical pattern. Cycles. 💡💥💯

@Eaglepass

6 ай бұрын

Manifold

@JKDVIPER

6 ай бұрын

@@Eaglepass yup. Pretty much. A more inspired way of looking at it.

@LukeRiedler

5 ай бұрын

wait, why is this making me think of this girl I met? hmmmmmm, interesting. Anyway, well written, seems to be speaking to a number of people.

Click bait.

@stevenmoore3480

2 ай бұрын

it's basically all we've got now

@mrx1278

2 ай бұрын

How so Stev?

@stevenmoore3480

2 ай бұрын

@@mrx1278 you cannot sell anything now without lying about what it is you are actually going to get for your time or money...

@mrx1278

2 ай бұрын

@@stevenmoore3480 oh....

@Steven-ff4wl

2 ай бұрын

@@mrx1278 It's nonsense.

⚠️ The AI voice is from Eleven labs. Terrible. Many channels are using this same voice. The content here is also wrong in several points. 😮😮

My first time taking shrooms was in a local state park. We took them early and watched the sun rise while we laid on some picnic benches underneath a pavilion. I looked down and noticed that there were small piles of confetti sprinkled all around, probably from a kids birthday party the day before. Then I began to notice something strange. My mind began to assemble the confetti into groups that resembled Mandlebrot sets. I can’t explain it, but to this day I believe that the throwing and settling of confetti is not random, but organized by nature because everything is in perfect order, whether hidden or visible.

@Allyourheroswenttohell

4 ай бұрын

Every act is not random

@dareese6778

3 ай бұрын

How do u define perfect? According to whom or what?

Kind of crazy to think one may have formed a black hole half way across the universe over a spilled coffee. My bad.

this channel is legit underrated with only 76k subs because it puts out content of substance and not just the same 'float through the planets' with narrator voice on top typical space related channels.

@origenjerome8031

6 ай бұрын

We are just watching some random stitched videos of stock footages though.

@johnr2391

6 ай бұрын

This channel is legit shit you mean

Where's the *terrifying* part? 🙄🤡

@KaterinaZharaya

3 ай бұрын

The butterfly

@earthtraderssaga

3 ай бұрын

Er, the clickbait title? F'ing chatbots.

@CeoAhmedOsman

3 ай бұрын

The terrifying part is what stopped us scrolling, froze us in space and nicked our time

chatGPT did not cook on this one

I'm still trying to determine when I throw garbage around the house and mice show up later if that's probabilistic or deterministic. I know the answers are SOMEWHERE in this video.