Ive worked with marble & granite for over 25 years. There is absolutely no way that was done with primitive chisels. Even with todays technology and tools, this is incredibly hard to carve out. To get the inside corners so precise is almost impossible. Whatever it was that they used, it was definitely powered by something other than muscle, granite is way to tough to chisel like that. They must of had some power source which was at least equivalent to electricity, and used diamond tipped tools or something even tougher. Great vid, Glad i found this channel- been binging on your vids for a couple of days now. Thanks for the great vids that you produce, i feel as if im there on location. No other channel gives that experience.

@steve-o6413

3 жыл бұрын

It was probably all done with Electromagnetic Fields and pulsing Arcs with no ware and tear on any tools. Just that simple...

@Va4444

3 жыл бұрын

@@steve-o6413 yeah sounds simple, lol

@user-yz6xj5bt6q

3 жыл бұрын

Brien Foerster channel is awesome great too

@victoriaevelyn3953

3 жыл бұрын

you'd be surprised as what can be done if the mason knew what they were doing with the tools they are use to working with for their whole lives on a daily basis on the same material

@jbpowell95

3 жыл бұрын

Could it have been roughly cut with hand tools, then sanded to achieve precision?

As an ex- aerospace engineer and builder of several houses, I have worked in many materials and with many advanced machine tools. The box with the half round arcitrave got me subscribing to your channel. The unpolished sections made with multiple facets tells me everything. These were made by serious machine tools, not hand tools without any doubt. The big elephant in the room is what happened to them ? and why can't we have TV like this instead of the brain numbing crap they serve up ?

@stuartculshaw5342

Жыл бұрын

I stopped watching TV 3 years ago and I feel much better for it.

@C-Culper4874

Жыл бұрын

Agree. I can see moving big objects. Technics for that isn't hard to figure out and / or apply. Working the stone is different. I would expect them to find bits of diamonds if I had to guess.

@andyman8630

Жыл бұрын

our best technology (chemical grade stainless) can only last 15k years - as for the rest? we can't even match the Romans

@paulkerr782

Жыл бұрын

I honestly believe they had extra terrestrial help. The fact that we've never found a single nut/ bolt, scrap of physical evidence of machinery - I'd suggest that when they left , they took it all with them - or maybe went and dumped it in the deepest ocean. I'd suggest they had advanced laser type machines, relying some kind of concentrated energy - which they probably had. Just a thought.

@stuartculshaw5342

Жыл бұрын

@@paulkerr782 It's really not helpful to say aliens did it. These guys are doing a lot of work on this and are trying to be taken seriously by the mainstream archeological community and the leaders of antiquities and research institutions.

Mind boggling what technique has been used! But what boggles the mind even more why so many intelligent people fail to see whats in front of their eyes, and refuse to see how much there is to be learned from all these clues! Thank you for showing this to us all!

@SLRModShop

11 ай бұрын

Here's the thing that boggles my mind. Imagine ANY tool... That tool will be used to create something more valuable/complex than the tool itself. Here, the tools (talking about rocks here) are so well made that they are beyond our comprehension. Which leads me to believe that the pyramids probably have usefulness that we have yet to discover. If pyramids do not have a purpose, it's the modern equivalent of constructing millions of huge cranes and piling them up to make 'modern art' or something... I know that a ton of people believe that the pyramids have more to them than meets the eye, but when you see what it took to make them, it's impossible that the result would be more primitive than the entire process of making them. It would run contrary to ANYTHING you can think of... We're not using jet engines to make paper sheets, we're not using processors to make tables... The current narrative is that they had the means to do something like that and they made something that is smaller (in terms of usefulness) than the sum of its parts... This doesn't add up.

@piercezhang8153

10 ай бұрын

@@SLRModShop yes, which points to the energy theory, if you can create unlimited amount of clean energy and transfer them through the pyramid then it'd be worth all the efforts, or as a communication device to gather or send information like the space telescope we create today. I mean of that kinda significance.

@SLRModShop

10 ай бұрын

@@piercezhang8153 I still have no clue to this day. But most pyramids (and only the first ones are interesting as I think that the more recent ones are copycats and Egyptians didn't have a clue either) have many features that seem stupid at first glance leading me to believe that the purpose eludes us. Entrance always on the North side, why? Entrance always going down, then splitting and going up. Pointless stress reliefs in the so called king's chamber. Queen's chamber always perfectly aligned 90° from each side of the pyramid. Every entrance of any king's chamber is always in a corner... why?! Every temple they ever made has its door centered. But the room where they were putting a Pharaoh in has a door in the corner? So strange. Feels like blasphemy almost. My money is on sound/vibrations. The unfinished obelisk in Aswan looks like the rock was melted and scooped. As if they could make the matter vibrate to soften it up and then scoop it. Vibrations can also levitate things (we can do it with tiny things), maybe they knew how to levitate huge things. Which would answer MANY questions. So, let's say they discovered "vibrational levitation", and in combination with huge rocks, these were their tool. The fact that they've built the pyramid with that leads me to believe that pyramids could probably either harness or create even bigger amount of vibration. Why? I don't know, I told you, I'm still clueless :)

@Tony11442

7 ай бұрын

​@@SLRModShop😂😂😂

@Andreas-yj8sx

6 ай бұрын

@@SLRModShop Interesting thought. Unfortunately, imo this does not seem to be sufficient for many things concerning religious ideas.

Wonderful video, and outstanding job getting the information you are providing out in a way that is accessible to almost anyone. I will definitely be checking out more of your videos ( this was my first), and I look forward to supporting your continued work and outreach. Please keep up the great work, and good luck on your future endeavors.

I work in design and drafting for aerospace products. I've read about this box before and it blew my mind. If we were to make something like this today, with modern CNC machines, it would be quite difficult and VERY expensive, and I think we'd have to build some specialized tools to do it. Keeping the features you mentioned to such tight tolerances would not be resultant to the manufacturing process. Meaning, unless we intentionally wanted them to be that tight, they would not be. That means that those who made this were so far advanced of us that this was just easy for them (which is mind blowing for obvious reasons). OR, at the very least they were as good as we are now, in 2021, and intended for those features to be that perfect. If that's the case, we have to ask why? Just to show off? I call BS. Most people would not even notice how perfectly it is made unless you pointed it out, and even then, most would not find it impressive because they don't understand how hard it is to do. No, I think think these features had a functional purpose, an it certainly wasn't to house a dead body. So what was it for? It's crazy how much we don't know about our own past.

@DilbertMuc

3 жыл бұрын

Absolutely. Especially if one considers the the precision on the inside of the box is extremely higher than on the outside. Laser tools showed precision down to microns on inner walls.

@johnchappell9232

2 жыл бұрын

Excellent point!!! Modern tolerance in building is +/- 2.5km Engineering tolerances are within the micron range. There is no reason to take time to make these boxes within tolerances that would exceed modern engineering tolerances. Unless you have tools so accurate that that's just how it is. There are possible set ups with jigs that would enable such accuracy though. Even with hand tools.

@christerpedersen7818

2 жыл бұрын

Same precision in Serapeum

@Mortismors

2 жыл бұрын

It looks like a good place to hide during the younger dryas. Maybe because it won't spill any liquid in it during an earthquake it held water.

@terryeleeemail

2 жыл бұрын

Safe storage and handling of hazardous material.

Having worked in the granite industry for years I can tell you that even with a modern cnc machine it would be difficult to replicate this in particular the radius in corners are virtually impossible with all but the most specialized equipment, and even today it would usually be much larger radius as the tools need to be bigger so they don't break when cutting. water jet cutting will give a very straight cut but how that is hollowed out is just remarkable. a water jet cuts all the way through. a cnc uses different shaped end cutters to achieve different profiles but quite how this was achieved without modern equipment is beyond me it is very apparent that whoever made this had a level of skill equal if not surpassing our own.

@BradBrassman

2 жыл бұрын

They know full well how it was done, but the Romans siezed all the evidence and its in the Vatican Library; forget about getting it out.

@carlcox7332

2 жыл бұрын

@@organutansphinx9614 only the bottom edge. But everything else inside and out is all square, level, plumb, and true which actually makes the inside of the box even more difficult. It's like they already knew the exact slant of the chamber floor before building the box and moving it in

@zervzerv1214

2 жыл бұрын

@Johny 00 If you melt granit you'll get obsidian glass. You can't just pour it back expecting to get granit again LOL

@JustinMurray170fin

2 жыл бұрын

@@BradBrassman And why exactly are the Vatican withholding this information and what are you basing your assertion off/from?

@zervzerv1214

2 жыл бұрын

@@Surgeeon This is a natural process that takes thousands of years deep within the earth. Imagine thinking you can melt rock then mold it and get the same the rock back LOLOLOL WE WUZ KANGZ

Just discovered this video and I'm utterly amazed by the content. Great work sir.👍

The box was in place and they built the room around it...AMAZING!!!!

As a stone worker and all things stone fabricstor for the past 20 years, I can say that in my company, we put beveled edges or "eased" edges on stone to prevent them from chipping and damage. Natural stone is most fragile when it comes to accidental damage. With that being said, as a professional Mason, this box was not made with copper chizles and hammers. No. Way. By the way, granite is one of a kind. Melting it down is impossible, as you would not get the same crystal structure anymore, which would just turn it into crumbly lava like rock.

@Toppradd

3 жыл бұрын

Well said ... besides the material itself, the cooling speed and method would be critical - each stone...under any logical or reasoned criteria- Its utterly ridiculous that they were “poured” ...as some high financed, farce for documentary show ...

@diegocarranza587

3 жыл бұрын

Can we replicate this box with existing technology?

@Toppradd

3 жыл бұрын

@@diegocarranza587 nope ...i don’t believe so, certainly not in the space it’s resting ...

@DigitalDNA

3 жыл бұрын

@@diegocarranza587 we could replicate it, but it would not be out of one solid block. It would have to be several blocks fit to size glued together. Yes. I said glued. A lot of your daily stone countertop installation includes "seams" which are usually glued together by a resin or a 2 part epoxy compound. Because the stone slabs are smaller than some dimensions of the projects, "seams" is an artistic choke point in the countertop fabrication process. IT is imperative to make the two different pieces of stone as smooth as possible across the seam and as level as possible, because people pay money for that shit. Nobody likes imperfect stone! Some particular projects can involve sandwiching different slabs of stone to make more girthier granite or quartz monuments or tomb stones. The sandwich ingredients process involves gluing the stone like a sandwich, them shaping it. It all involves highly concentrated epoxy or some sort of plastic compound to bond. Thats the only way I see this box being made. We do not have the technology to carve that out of one giant rock and shape everything so precisely. Our most advanced hand held tools are crude and not as efficient to tackle particularly tight corners and leaving everything clean. Our diamond technology is based on a set of grit levels which is really annoying and time consuming. This technology seems to have utilized a "one size fits all" approach. So the answer to your question is no. We can't replicate this today. Especially out of Rose granite of all things for fucks sake! That material is an 7/10 on the stone density scale and its a freaking Granite! Thats insane shit to work with of all things!

@DigitalDNA

3 жыл бұрын

@@Toppradd youre right to point out the space its resting. As that would be an indicator that it would have to be carved on sight. So questions: 1. Where is the removed rubble from the giant square hole in the box? 2. It would be impossible to get the box down here through the shafts that were already constructed, it would have to be carved in place or be carved and placed there in the middle of the construction phase. 3. If carved after construction phase, what tools did they use? CNC machine? Doesn't look like it. It would have to be hand tools.

Such a great video! You're a very rational skeptic. I'm a geologist so I know a granite and a limestone when I see one and it's no doubt those are what I see. Here's my 2 cents. A bit long winded but there is a lot to cover and I might as well give it some effort seeing as you've given a lot of that yourself in making this content. The granite stone you show looks like an alkali-feldspar rich plutonic felsic igneous rock. The dominant mineral by far is the reddish orange alkali feldspar and the minor components are the white (quartz & plagioclase) and dark (biotite & amphibole) minerals. Quartz is transparent and plagioclase is more opaque. If you saw more quartz relative to plagioclase then this would be an alkali-feldspar granite. If you found more plagioclase relative to quartz then this would be an alkali-feldspar syenite. It has a porphyritic texture meaning the feldspar crystals are larger than the crystals of the other minerals. Every magma chamber has a different chemical composition because the specific part of the crust that is being heated and melted has its own rock composition and formational history. Therefore it is possible to do a chemical element analysis of the carved stone and match it to the host quarry stone. This is what geochemists would do. Veining appears minor, at least from the footage you showed. Veins are 3D fracture planes created during deformation events after the rock has been formed. The voids are then filled by superheated mineral fluids (generally silica/quartz). These veins represent geotechnical planes of failure for mining engineers. So for this precise engineering work the block was clearly chosen very carefully by skilled labour who knew a thing or two about rock mechanics. To the point of geopolymers: Granite/syenite is the solidified (crystallised) form of magma chambers deep below the surface, made of continental crust melts in this case. The large crystals are created because the minerals have lots of time to grow due to the slow cooling inside the magma chamber. So the minerals have time to crystallise into distinct, large crystals of feldspar, quartz, plagioclase etc. Under a microscope you would be able to see the sequence of crystallisation (the order in which the minerals crystallised). This cooling takes many many years, thousands of years even. The extrusive forms of granite and syenite are called rhyolite and trachyte respectively. These rocks are the same chemical composition as the magma chamber but physically they appear different. They form by the rapid cooling of the magma as it hits the fridge-like temperatures of the atmosphere, going from its liquid phase above 700°C down to 25°C in an instant. It's like a process of flash freezing. The minerals inside the extruding magma have hardly any time to grow before they are cooled below their individual solidus temperatures, where they turn solid. The cooled rock is therefore very fine grained so can be very difficult to distinguish from another fine grained rock and would require a microscope to see the crystals. Felsic rocks like granite and syenite hold more volatile gases like CO2 and are also very brittle when cooled so rapidly so they tend to erupt more explosively than the slushy soft basaltic lavas of mafic magma chambers like in Hawaii. What I'm trying to say is that melting the granite and pouring it in a mold would be very hard. Moreover, the rapid cooling time (even if you waited years at a time) would only produce very fine-grained stones. I also don't see any cemented kind of stones in your footage. Those stones are quite clearly crystalline igneous rocks. As for the limestone, the carbonate sedimentary rock itself is essentially a fossil conglomerate made up of compressed and crushed up shells of dead marine organisms. You'll find large fossils preserved in a cement of smaller fossil fragments which are themselves surrounded by even smaller fossils. The more you zoom in the more fossils you'll find. Again, if you somehow managed to melt limestone and pour it into molds the stone would have zero resemblance to the natural version.

@sofa-lofa4241

3 жыл бұрын

Great to see someone here who really knows his facts, great info, cheers

@TheMIKEUL

3 жыл бұрын

Thank You for explaining this in such a great detail! geopolymers: as I remember, Davidovits used grinded minerals (with pounding stones) and not melted. I saw a video of him recreating poured limestone. (not sure about granite) The proof of his theory, that every stone that solidifies has a magnetic orientation - so if they were poured in situ - every block should be oriented the same, whilst if they are quarried then put into place those orientations would be random. He made the measurements and states the blocks have the same orientation.

@marchismo8514

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah heating limestone might not melt it, but rather burn it and you'll lose a lot of it's weight as CO2 gas. Limestone is just calcium carbonate, CaCO3, so heating would break that up and create CO2 gas and calcium oxide (good old industrial lime). Limestone doesn't have iron, or the magnetic ions of iron so is not magnetic. When Mg is chemically added in nature it becomes hard dolomite. Fe can substitute for the Mg but it's still hard dolomite, not limestone anymore. The Fe dolomite might be weakly magnetic but it takes a lot of specifically magnetic Fe ions to become noticeable. Usually, if dolomite is magnetic it means the rock sequence has separate, fine layers within it specifically composed of high Fe concentrations, generally chemical sedimentary marine deposits called ironstones. The solidification of rocks doesn't mean they get magnetised automatically. Magnetic iron needs to be part of the melt rock composition in order to freeze their magnetic alignment when they turn solid (called the Currie Temperature). And the iron needs to be concentrated to create noticeable magnetic fields that can be measured. A limestone isn't usually magnetic unless it is interlayered with ironstone. Granite can only be magnetic if the Fe mafic minerals are high in concentration, and in the right ion ratio, to form magnetic minerals like magnetite or pyrrhotite. Iron rocks need to have the magnetic Fe ions to be magnetic. I'm not a specialist in geochemistry or geophysics to speak deeply about the process of measuring poorly magnetic rocks for their magnetic orientations. Magnetic rocks have a magnetic field called a remanent magnetic field. It's the field that is frozen in when the rock was formed. However, a weak remanent field may not be strong enough to show up above the background magnetism of the Earth's current magnetic field. You'd need to be able to measure the 2 fields so a non-magnetic rock like limestone would be very difficult to measure separately. If the Earth's magnetic field is measured instead of the remanent field in the blocks then of course they will all seem to have the same orientation. So you can use powdered limestone to make new blocks I suppose. But the fossils will be truly microscopic because those are the only sizes that survived the crushing and milling machines that made the powder. The process doesn't create new fossils, it just destroys fossils that are too large and preserves fossils that are small enough to survive the process. To preserve larger chunks you'd probably need a fine-grained cement material to cement the chunks of limestone together. If you find visible fossils and no signs or contacts with cement material it's probably not man-made.

@Ness2Alyza

3 жыл бұрын

Best comment! Thanks for the detailed info!

@gregclark5344

3 жыл бұрын

You obviously know your stuff, Can you tell me what temperature would be required to melt granite?

Great video Ben! Thanks a lot for your work. You still can show things I haven't seen yet and hang out with Jimmy B Insight, it can only get better! Thanks again ☺️

Mate, I want to say a big thanks: your way of presenting is calm and likeable; I appreciate it that you just "open doors" to let us see through for ourselves.

I have NEVER seen the arched room like this ever in the million Egyptian videos I have watched...then the box...best new video on the entire internet Ben. 🌟. Also the video walk through was like I was there. Much respect 🙏. Thanks

@RebeccaLee2424

3 жыл бұрын

Came to say the same thing. This is so important and should be well studied and explored. Sadly, it takes so much time and effort to explore these ancient sites and that requires so much money nowadays. I only hope they explore this site and most importantly the box more in my lifetime?

@funitoo

3 жыл бұрын

Ben is not the only one nor is he the first one, there is a Russian alternative history group called LAI they do proper research and use high end equipment and they get to newly opened locations before anyone else. But they speak russian, so no one knows about them. Stuff they notice and talk about is incredible.

@nickboyle5545

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed this is insane

@kailiebejung

3 жыл бұрын

My words.

@bobolovski

3 жыл бұрын

@@funitoo link?

I have a Masters Degree in geology. There is NO way that box is made of powder or molten rock - the crystallinity of the rock is clearly genuine granite; it stems from slow cooling (thousands of years) happening far under ground at some pressure. If you melt granite and pour and let it cool under ambient pressure and temperature, you would get either glass (obsidian) or a very finegrained "volcanic" rock, rhyolite. Forget about powder and molten rock. Super interesting video, just like the other ones. 👍👍👍

@lancehobbs8012

11 ай бұрын

Thank you. We dont need to speculate, a whole field of science already exists: geology. Geologists such as yourself can conclusively tell a natural rock from a poured block just like a Zoologist can tell a lion from a tiger. There is no debate and its not even that hard. Now try telling that to the " alien technology" crowd😅

@EvinsWardlaw

11 ай бұрын

​@@lancehobbs8012 I would love for there to be concerted effort to index these materials... as they do with metals. The chemical composition of metals allows for them to be aged and regionally located. I think there would be tremendous value in creating that index because it appears that many of these sites a meshed together from different projects... the video touched on that towards the end of the video. The index would provide morr evidence of that reality. I'd also like to see a review on why some of the stones appear to be geopolymers after corr samples were taken... it found the 20ton upper layer stones contained microbubbles, human hair, and other irregularities that wouldnt exist in naturally created stone. However, that same structure had 80ton foundation stones where the extracted core samples proved to be naturally created stone.

@Engineering_Science

10 ай бұрын

Was made using Whitworth Three Plates Method

@Simp_Zone

9 ай бұрын

It's 100% impossible for them to have "cast" that granite. It's already been proven via crystaline analysis. This channel just wants to push bs theories.

@Simp_Zone

9 ай бұрын

Because they make shit loads of money doing so is the answer to your next question.

I'm absolutely hooked. There's no doubt the level of sophistication was much, MUCH higher than the main stream narrative previously thought. The precision of these granite structures is mind blowing.

Great video, thanks! Here after being in Egypt with Jahanna, very excited for lots more content of yours to explore :)

As someone who has worked with manufacturing granite and marble countertops/vanities, in a fairly decent sized fabrication shop, the uniform precision of the beveled edge on the outer lip is extremely difficult to perfect even by modern standards. Never mind the more intricate precision details of a 90° angle on the Y-axis. Truly outstanding…

@cortedemico

Жыл бұрын

you tell'em...

@aesoundforge

Жыл бұрын

I think the scientist and archeologist need to get more guys like you who actually do the work on the team...

@Jonathan_Doe_

Жыл бұрын

Grindstones/Silica sand + water + time + slaves

@independentpatriot1775

Жыл бұрын

@@Jonathan_Doe_ not even in a million years

@paulollerhead

Жыл бұрын

Right, we need to rustle up some slaves and test this. I can’t imagine slave work is this accurate though 🤣

Brilliant, that’s the first footage I’ve ever seen of this amazing stone box. The precision’s astonishing.

Geopolymer therory always had this flaw - never really able to expain how the granite blocks could have shaped. As in many megalithic structures we see, it retained ita original striations and layering, a feat impossible when all are proposedly melted to become one consistent mixture. Thanks Ben for continuing doing this great work!

I don't know about anyone else, but the geopolymer theorists are driving me nuts. I've been saying that the geological properties of granite just don't work like that for quite a while, not to mention all the obvious evidence from quarry to finished product virtually littering Egypt. Other places, perhaps there's a case, but in Egypt? Not a chance. Melt down some granite and see what it looks like, you won't end up with granite when you're done.

@julianboyd4921

3 жыл бұрын

Maybe somebody should show Adrian Nash this video 🤷‍♂️😉

@shanecreamer6889

3 жыл бұрын

As a geopolymer camp person I don't think anybody credible is disputing the incredible granite carving work. But the common building stones have been conclusively shown at both Egypt and at locations like Puma Puncu that under electron spectrography have straw in the samples of the middle of the blocks, and the spectrographic analysis shows the constituents of concrete cannot be denied. I think this makes a lot of practical sense. Save your skilled stone masons for the Granite work, and the common blocks nobody cares about go ahead and pour via geopolymer techniques. I think a balanced position can be taken. kzread.info/dash/bejne/pJpt061ygbfSoZM.html - start at 35 minutes to see the Scanning Electron Microscope results of the rock samples.

@Skinflaps_Meatslapper

3 жыл бұрын

@@shanecreamer6889 Hence the reason why I said perhaps in other places. Geopolymer just doesn't make sense when you're talking about granite works.

@Skinflaps_Meatslapper

3 жыл бұрын

@@KittyBoom360 Oh, granite can be replicated, it's just not feasible to do so. Those separate minerals have to be at just the perfect temperature for one to crystallize and form while the rest are still molten, then slowly cooled until the next mineral crystallizes and/or solidifies. It would take centuries or more for all that to happen consistently enough to make a granite conglomeration that would be recognizable as a granite. Heat them all up together and then let them cool within a timeframe that would be usable to a human and all you're going to get is volcanic glass. It's not magic or fairy dust, it's just geology...we know the processes involved and unfortunately it requires some level of understanding in the subject before it becomes obvious.

@MrAndreatex

3 жыл бұрын

@@Skinflaps_Meatslapper well said. Even for blocks from sedimentary rock the evidence for a geopolimer origin in my opinion are weak.

This is the kind of stuff that should be on the news and front page of every newspaper.

@teppo9585

3 жыл бұрын

If news were about informing populace it would.

@jimmyzhao9748

3 жыл бұрын

Instead we get stories about the Kardashians.

@tinutube3858

3 жыл бұрын

Very true. Atleast more and more people become interested in stuff like this.

@blameusa7082

3 жыл бұрын

no air time.. they must push the false fear... and hide things like this!

@davepowell7168

2 жыл бұрын

@@jimmyzhao9748 Atlantean wisdom seekers?

Great stuff Ben, thank you for all your hard work!

This is seriously what I am curious about. Thank you for sharing those footages and insights. This precision box is (one more? ) indeniable proof of some long forgotten highly technical society.

I’m a machinist, and it’s a dream of mine to go in there with a set of calipers, micrometers and all my measuring tools. I would measure everything I could!!

@feger481

2 жыл бұрын

I would have been happy just to give the interior of that box a good vacuuming and cleaning. Then you could take your measurements.

@CleaveMountaineering

2 жыл бұрын

Bring a surface plate or cast iron straight edge for scraping, and some high spot blue. Maybe your best big square too. I just haven't figured out how they got the inside corners square.

@avenpace

2 жыл бұрын

@@feger481 LMAO :)

@IDGAF56852

2 жыл бұрын

You will find the tolerances are so precise you will have difficulty measuring the differences.

@SymzQC

2 жыл бұрын

I’m a stone maçon and I can tell you getting these result in granite by hand without carbide chisel and diamond blade is virtually impossible. Line stone on the other hand would be doable.

Everyone who has some experience with precision machining instantly knows this is 100% impossible with hand held tools, including modern tools. You don't just get lucky on this kind of surface precision and paralell precision.

@shrikedecil

3 жыл бұрын

I'd personally like a model of this box, just to hand out: "Could you give me a price quote on making me one of these, please?" The "Oldest vases" with the millimeter wall single-piece stone construction are also "ok, you can't make me one for a million." ROBRENZ fighting to get this sort of precision on a surface place, etc ... not easy at all.

@vikitheviki

3 жыл бұрын

Tell that to Hawass 😁😁

@therinchilnsford777

3 жыл бұрын

How long have you been working with granite?

@carrythetorch33

3 жыл бұрын

I was an aerospace machinist for 11 years. I ran very, very precise machines. You can maintain a couple thou tolerances fairly easily, even 5 ten thousandths of an inch. However, the longer the dimension, the more difficult these tolerances are to keep. Slight changes in temp even can change you dimensions. These boxes are unbelievable. I cannot wrap my head around it. Peace my friends

@pjeffries301

3 жыл бұрын

Well said. With experience in both machining and stonework, I can say with confidence this box and room are impossible to re-create in our modern time regardless of the budget. Whoever made these used technology that has never existed, not now, not ever. ?.

Its mindblowing. The outside of the box is one thing. The arches. How that box is cored out with such precision with no marking is just mindblowing.

Whoever made this, I see two possibilities. Either it was easy for them to make objects like this (they already had the tech and the precision was a byproduct of using that tech) or they really needed to make it so precisely (they were willing to invest the time and the effort because the box had a function other than just being a storage space).

@scottanderson3751

3 ай бұрын

Comment above is from someone with a masters degree in geology-says it’s naturally formed granite 😉

The box is impressive, however I literally shouted HOLY SHIT at the precision arched ceiling and it's beveled! Yikes!😳

@phrtao

3 жыл бұрын

Reminds me of the Sudama cave at Barabar in India (except that is carved from rock and this is made from panelling). Maybe for the same purpose ?

@ALT3REDB3AST

3 жыл бұрын

@@eclipse369. Rise from your grave! Altered Beast. SEGA. Yep.👍🏾

@AceCrickey

3 жыл бұрын

Welcome to your doom!

@perderabo

3 жыл бұрын

Power UP!

@lennonwilson7373

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, that ceiling deserves it's own video!

I’m 53 years old and have worked with wood, metal, concrete and rock for years. There’s no way they did this with copper or bronze tools.

@tyc6268

Жыл бұрын

The same thing is said about Greek structures yet we know those were made with bronze tools because they documented it. Maybe they just knew a lot more about polymers and stonemasonry back then because rich pharaohs incentivized it.

@smoothmove7566

Жыл бұрын

I'm still stuck on the moving of 800 ton statues.

Ben is so engaging when explaining the details and varied aspects involved when these areas were built. He is easy to understand and genuinely happy to share his discoveries. Thank you for increasing my knowledge of these ancient sites.

@jaysautoandmore1771

5 ай бұрын

He answers every theory😮

Very interesting, the precision is amazing on this box of granite. As for how they oriented it I guess they could easily have found out of to make a compass back then since they seemed to have high technologies already. That way they could have oriented the box without having to look at the sky.

Even if it was created by geopolymer, the mould would still have to meet the high precision levels, so it does not explain the enigma.

@zm5668

3 жыл бұрын

???? You can make a mould out of ... Sand or dirt or clay - or any soft material - we do this today. The difficulty of precision comes from being precise in an incredibly hard material.

@ProsonicStudiosLLC

3 жыл бұрын

@@zm5668 ??? The weight of the cast material would flex the soft mold, there's no way you're going to get tolerances like this with a soft mold.

@zm5668

3 жыл бұрын

@@ProsonicStudiosLLC ??????????????? Nice try I was answering his question in relation to precision of the moulds. I was just making the point you can make moulds out of a soft material to be very precise. So you know sand or clay won't compress? I dont think you do. At any rate the whole idea of geopolymer is ridiculous. I think it's dumb - Like I said I was only responding to his point about the moulds being precise. That is the whole point of moulds after all is to obtain a shortcut to precision. But you are trying to get me on a different point that I never made. And you have no basis to make the claim you did anyway. Sand and clay and other such things used for metal moulds don't "flex" for obvious reasons.

@GuinessOriginal

3 жыл бұрын

@@zm5668 in order to execute precision you need to be able to measure precision, no matter what medium you work on. This is extremely difficult and has only been achieved in the modern era in the last 60 or 70 years at the earliest

@zm5668

3 жыл бұрын

@@GuinessOriginal That is only partially true But when it comes to square angles and blocks. The dynastic Egyptians had that technology and would be able to make a mould. It is far more difficult to replicate that out of hard granite that a soft sand

When ever I see some intricately carved rock my mind blows . As a tradesman I understand the amount of labor that goes into making things perfect. The planning stage is critical. “Perfect” doesn’t happen by accident . You must be a skilled and trained craftsman to produce Any kind of consistency. Let alone thousands of craftsman working together to create GIANT architecture. In FRICKEN ROCK ! Rock is incredibly hard to work precisely in. And somehow “they” whoever the hell they were, have produced precision before precision was a thing . And it’s still standing thousands of years later . Whitworth discovered thou my ass !

@theknave4415

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. The internal corners of that box blow me away. ;) I've worked as a craftsman and technician, including stone and precision machined components. You simply cannot - *cannot* - get that level of precision with hand tools. It is impossible.

@mrspikiespike4807

3 жыл бұрын

In the case of the obelisk (same at Easter Island on the statues), it's 2 part process. 1. First rough cut is in the form of the 'scoop' marks by way of melting either melting or altering the molecular structure somehow to be able to carve or scoop it with ease. I would suggest a hi-tech tool that could change the molecular structure of any type of rock at various depths from fine 1-2mm up to a foot (I say roughly a foot as that is the width of the 'scoop' marks) that it would be in such a state of flux that it would be free to be shaped or removed. This is just to get the basic shape required. (a lot like cutting down a tree and running the log through the sawmill to cut the size you want, you then take that piece of wood and give it to a carpenter to lave into whatever you want to create) 2. Once the rough cut was achieved, then the second part of the process was to finish, either by cutting or laser type devices to give the final smooth finish to the object in question. (no I have no idea what tech on this part, maybe even the same device set on a different mode or setting for all I know) 3. Transportation. They would have to use some sort of levitation/anti-gravity type tool to transport (as crane type devices just wouldn't cut the mustard). And if they have devices that are capable of molecular state altering, then they are pretty much smart enough to have a levitational technology as well.

@DilbertMuc

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrspikiespike4807 Did you ever see a laser on stone? It doesn't work. The laser heats up individual crystals in stone which vaporize and explode instantly. When cutting stone by laser the surface is very rough due to this microexplosions. In a homogenous crystalline structure like metal that does not occur and thus metal can be cut precisely by laser. That's why stone is cut by high-pressure water jets or by saws. The unfinished obelisk shows regular scooping marks from some kind of rotating grinding abrasion tools. Like an excavator machine. And they are all the same width, so definitely a machine tool. Forget Zahi Hawass with his slaves pounding diorite balls against the hard granite... :D)))

@mrspikiespike4807

3 жыл бұрын

@@DilbertMuc I think you took that way to litraley in what I was attempting to get at. Neither you or I can point to their technology or the machines utilized, hence why I said "(no I have no idea what tech on this part, maybe even the same device set on a different mode or setting for all I know)". I used the term "Laser type device" more so as a definement in a technological device that is capable of pinpoint accuracy and uniformity in terms of cutting...hang on can't use that, you will take that literally as a blade of some type...slicing...dissecting ability. Another similar example would be the hyroglifics found on many obelisks, they have the 'Laser like appearance' or better still, an 'engraved type appearance'. More to the point was some sore of tech that finished it off perfectly smooth and straight. And yes, there is clear evidence that saws of some description was used on various assorted objects, there is no question on that. Many even leave telltale striation marks of such cuts and drills. As to your rotating grinding abrasion tools...not so sure, they are smooth as a baby's bum with no finite striation marks anywhere to be seen, unlike other objects. And please, don't forget, you are basing all this on your current level of knowledge of building techniques of the 21st century in which we as a society are unable to comprehend how they where built by todays standards...so you have to think outside the box a little. Like it or not, they were more advanced than us today, heck, we still don't even know what their purpose was for.

@DilbertMuc

3 жыл бұрын

@@mrspikiespike4807 Actually, as we do not know how they cut the stones and more curiously how the hell they transported those huge monsters and moved them around in narrow tunnels (without using some anti-gravity machines... ;) we need to exclude possibilites to find out the real truth. So far we know that they certainly didn't use Zahi Hawass' Diorite pounding balls and some copper chisels. Same with the thousands of vases with 1mm thick stone walls. There can be made cuts with copper, but it leads to nowhere. Same with wooden cranes for 1400t blocks in Baalbeck or the unfinished Obelisk, which is impossible. Later, the Romans had a way to transport big blocks, but not 1400t monsters. How could the granite box be carved then? Not by laser, not by hand tools. That's what we know. I am not suggesting a computer controlled CNC machine, which would be the logical answer, but obviously impossible... or is it?

Ben, as an amateur researcher, deciphering images, etc, I have noticed another thing you may be aware of, that of the stones at Stonehenge and at Sacsayhuaman, that portraits cut in relief were once decorating the outside of the exposed stone blocks. At some point, the portraitures were erased, or destroyed. What really interests me, is that some of the stones show an acid-bath exposure, I assume to help in removing the portraiture. That is story #1. Story #2, I am finding humanoid portraiture in NASA, ESA, and Roscosmos postings of Mars, and even some Moons of the planets, visible in the sourced displays, with no Photoshop necessary. Story 3, by sheer accident, I stumbled across humanoid portraiture on the walls of the Puerto Rican Trench, starting at the shelf level of the Atlantic floor, -19,000 feet, and descending all the way to the floor, at -27,000+ feet now underwater, of course. (Average I am guessing at -22,000 feet). You are looking for clues to previous exceptional technology, I think these are sheer proof examples. Good luck, great work.

Amazing it is still intact after thousands of years of earthquakes. The amount or dirt and rock taken out to create that is impressive and how deep it is. Also, it may be a ritual bath tub. Cleanliness was close to being holy back then and if you look at the video closely you see a water line inside just about half way up inside where it goes from darker to lighter.

@K0RP53

5 ай бұрын

You might be right. Maybe the boxes are bath tubs. Or maybe ancient storage units with storage boxes? An ancient banking lock-box? Lol Did they have such things?

@petermartin9494

4 ай бұрын

That ain't no bathtub, I can assure you of that.

@MD-zm6sn

4 ай бұрын

Imagine it being as simple as these being receptacles for the holy water that the pharaoh had to drink haha. Or like imagine some ritual including water that had never been touched by the sun or something.

@t-technews

3 ай бұрын

Well we build bunkers for a variety of reasons and I think they did the same with tunnels and their own self defense, but they had to have a place to hold water for drinking and bathing, but also just for the boss. So who has the money can get a nice bathtub made out of granite, while the others get sponge baths. Who knows, but it just makes sense to me having that so far underground and it is not in a palace.

I was reading Petrie's work " the pyramids and temples of Gizeh" today in the morning and I thought to myself " I wonder if uncharted X will post a new video today" and here it is, thanks! XD

I'd give my life to go back and see how all this stuff was built, just imagine watching how this civilization lived for a week in spectator mode

@krazykillar4794

2 жыл бұрын

Me too !

@scottyboy7462

2 жыл бұрын

it hurts my brain trying to figure this out. truly mind bending. the answer is probably more obvious than we think.

@dougwedel9484

2 жыл бұрын

Chances are, you won't need to give your life to find this stuff out. The biggest problem we've had was feeling superior to all civilizations who came before us, with the notion we keep adding knowledge and very little was lost. We think knowledge just piles on each successive culture, til one day we live like Star Trek. Including the idea vast amounts of knowledge can be swept away can give us the humility to at least ask the questions we need to ask. That's a big shift in our thinking, moving to another paradigm.

@dunno6442

2 жыл бұрын

@@dougwedel9484 yeah, Ive always thought civilizations that long a ago wouldve had time to evolve further than we know, all that time they didn't event the wheel?.. who knows what they were using back then and where it ended up

@takingbacktheradio7382

2 жыл бұрын

@@dunno6442 I believe Egypt had chariots. A lot of the architecture we have today, was built off of their discoveries. I think a lot of history got lost, or erased, or changed, as civilizations fell

Thank you for your videos. I love em. You do such a good job of just laying out the facts. Love it!

It would be interesting to see this surface at a microscopic level and see if there are any striations or scratches

@CarsCatAliens

8 ай бұрын

There was french documentary done titled "BAM" which I believe was an acronym for "Before or Beyond Ancient Materials or megalith" I forget. However they take measurements of angles, of the flatness, hardness, and polish. They bring up some great thoughts and point out things one may not think of. Check it out, it's very informative,as well as mind blowing of the precision involved.

@se7en910

8 ай бұрын

​@@CarsCatAliensbuilders of ancient mysteries

@CarsCatAliens

8 ай бұрын

@@se7en910 Thank you for clarifying that. Yeah, I don't know why I didn't take 15 seconds and look up the acronym.

@georgekraus9357

5 ай бұрын

Microscopic photos should be taken for each measured segment along the length of the surface to determine of there is any changes in the surface. It would be incredible if they find little or lack of changes on the surface (due to wear of tools, inconsistent pressure of tools, etc., all possible reasons). With the accurate tools we have today, we have enough work to keep scientists busy for years to come.

@CarsCatAliens

5 ай бұрын

@@georgekraus9357 Watch the documentary by a french team. Search B.A.M building ancient monuments... The do a lot of precision measuring, surface smoothness...

Ant walks through an old car engine, enters manifold, explores a cylinder... wonders "Is this the king's tomb"?

@jfdomega7938

3 жыл бұрын

Lol, very good analogy!

@kertyoussmith6152

3 жыл бұрын

Looking at layout, I’d say he’s in the turbo, but why the 4inch taper on the gasket?

@3SIXTYPROD

3 жыл бұрын

Wow beautiful analogy I never thought of it like that

@EliteRock

3 жыл бұрын

_"We live within the ruins of an ancient structure whose vast size has hitherto rendered it invisible."_

There’s a civilization before the Egyptians that we know nothing about. This work is insane. And any Egyptologist who says this was made from copper tools deserves to be slapped on the spot. 😂🥷🏽

@nobytes2

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I think all that was created before Egyptians were even a thing and they appropriated everything to make themselves look more powerful than what they were. To me is hard to think it was built without pulley systems and cranes or elevators. I guess we'll never know the truth.

@dellingson4833

2 жыл бұрын

the DNA of the tested mummies is only a 1-2% match with the current residents. You can lookup where the majority of the DNA is from. And the fact the mummies have tobacco and cocaine in their systems. There was a world wide transfer of trade and technology. The Piri Reis map from 1513 and the story behind it is amazing.

@sedwillful

2 жыл бұрын

@@nobytes2 Africans

@mrfreeze2446

2 жыл бұрын

@@sedwillful funny joke, nice trolling 😂

@lukaslambs5780

2 жыл бұрын

Yes because you know more about Egypt than an Egyptologist

What I don't understand is why no electron microscope scanning has not ever been done on these boxes to try and find some trace of the tools used to make them. Even after couple thousand years there would surely be some detectable metal embedded in those boxes especially if made of a copper alloy!

@Bart-Did-it

2 жыл бұрын

Well fantasy sells more truth makes people lose interest

@danquaylesitsspeltpotatoe8307

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bart-Did-it They used granite to cut and smooth granite! Its pretty simple after thye used much harder what to cut them out of the bedrock? Do you know the answer? NON OF YOU BIG MOUTHED IGNORNAT FOOLS DO! its dolerite1

@fladoodel

2 жыл бұрын

I believe Christopher Dunn did examine an artifact with a microscope. I want to say it was the schist disk or core drill #7

@oldogre5999

2 жыл бұрын

@@Bart-Did-it True but I really believe that many of these artifacts are truly much older than we are being told. Especially the stone ones, they can't carbon date stone and from what I understand the other methods do not work either. Then there is the just massive size of the stones themselves and the accuracy in how they were cut.. Things just don't add up.

@Bart-Did-it

2 жыл бұрын

@@oldogre5999 trust me it was easy as PI or should I say cake it was all so very easy it just all took TIME and lots of hands and obviously supreme knowledge for the time . Most world experts believe that if the treasure of the knights Templar is found it’s will not just be gold diamonds and artefacts. The treasure will be a large library or! Just one big book with all the accumulative knowledge of mankind from about 5000 years ago till when the vault was sealed where ever it is . Knowledge is mankind’s greatest achievement the collection of knowledge for the future generations we are nothing without it just monkeys squatting in the mud .

Some years ago, I went with a friend who took me for a tour around the plant where he worked. One thing I never forgot, was the big black granite "flat" in the labs. It was about a foot thick and four by six feet in area. They used it to calibrate some of the machines and tools. This company wound paper. What really got me though, was that the big slab was finished and final calibrated by hand! For ancient Egypt (and everyone else) the great fire that destroyed the Library of Alexandria set modern technology back several centuries...

@northlondonmasons107

9 ай бұрын

Blame the Vatican for that and the Italians and Romans slippery bastards

Every so many months I have to come back and watch this episode, it blows me away. Thank you for your research brother.

I remember a time when every subject could be hypothesized, speculated about, with ideas, opinions, and facts freely discussed in an academic search for the truth, and no fear of being censored because it wasn't "the official story". So far, you've picked a topic that's still OK to think about and speak about. Good luck, I hope it lasts, because it's a highly compelling mystery.

@Glamisemt24

3 жыл бұрын

Very true. This limits our ability to learn and teaches us to accept what we our told as opposed to open it to debate and discussion

@DarranKern

3 жыл бұрын

There is no subject, academic or otherwise, free of censorship in 2021

@avlisk

3 жыл бұрын

@@DarranKern True. And it just got worse over the weekend as Parler was purged.

@kurtisdavis2004

3 жыл бұрын

It seems quite likely the ancient people described construction methods in terms of their gods---what we see relating to their gods (statues, murals, etc.) may well be telling us how they made things.

@BradBrassman

2 жыл бұрын

Because it undermines their whole knowledge base.

As a mechanical engineer we use large granite slabs as precision flat reference surface plates. I believe there is a very relevant point to think about, that is the method of how these plates are made. The precision flat surface is created (or at least finished).......by hand. No machines, but just a second flat plate to wear in the work piece. Critically, the more you use the tool plate the flatter the tool becomes. In other words by rubbing two roughly flat objects together they both become flatter and flatter. I believe that is how the surface is finished with the sarcophagus. These precision flat surfaces are used today for creating other flat and straight components. Granite is the perfect material for this purpose as it is both stiff and very stable mechanically and thermally. I have a granite straightedge in my workshop used to setup other precision machine tools. - I would love to explain this more to you and perhaps show you the stone working techniques.

@gringott12

Жыл бұрын

No, Alien Technology is the only answer.

@rockjockchick

Жыл бұрын

@@gringott12 lol. Why?

@BungieStudios

Жыл бұрын

Thank you.

@billrugg-easey4764

Жыл бұрын

I also thought of a granite lapping plate made by hand. It's not difficult if you know what you're doing and have time on your hands. In this machine age people seem to forget how well things can be made by hand. I've seen lapping plates ground by hand that are so flat that when one is placed on the other they stick.

@martinirons89

11 ай бұрын

Why explain how to do something simple when you could just as easily replicate it.

They won't allow too much technical analyzing of Egyptology because we'll find out that Egypt only adopted it, they did not build it.

thanks so much for making this brilliant doco, your experience is overwhelming. Its such a mystery how they did all this way back.? very best wishes to you for your great effort to show us .cheers from NZ

The biggest mystery to me is why modern Archaeologists want to completely ignore these kinds of discoveries!

@PaulBrown-uj5le

2 жыл бұрын

Ignore?, why do you think they're ignoring it?.

@LeicaM11

2 жыл бұрын

…because their is no other explanation, than „made by extraterrestrials 👽 „🤫

@Bronco541

2 жыл бұрын

Ive never seen these things mentioned on mainstream documentaries at all

@JasonUmbrellabird

2 жыл бұрын

@@LeicaM11 Of course there is. Humanity is older than we think. The whole point of Brien's posts are evidence of a global cataclysm.

@rodschmidt8952

2 жыл бұрын

It's all about organizational politics. Pioneers get arrows in their backs. Nobody wants to be the fly in the ointment who says that their peers have been wrong all this time. Their status, and ultimately funding, would dry up.

Gotta love the grave robber explanation for the empty King's Chamber, etc. They stole everything including the stars and hieroglyphs covering the walls and ceiling. Damned thorough.

@davemorris6644

2 жыл бұрын

It’s such a joke

@robokill387

Жыл бұрын

Yes, people looking to make money are going to steal everything they can get their hands on.

@sonofeyeabovealleffoff5462

Жыл бұрын

@Paul Taylor they forgot to steal the pyramid too, wouldn't fit in their purses.

Terrific, rock-solid video (pun intended!). As an engineer myself, I super appreciate the discipline, logic and rigor that goes in to this work - it's not easy! And it requires a deep personal restraint to focus on the right way to go through this. Bravo! Excellent work.

I think the most viable explanation is that the fine work was not just Egyptian but from an outer assistance. ie from alien life forms It is nice to here an Australian accent and approach too!

I fully agree with you: not a "geopolymer"! Taking a simple 10X jewelers loop magnifying glass and looking closely at granite shows the quartz, feldspar, mica and other mineral grains actually to be individual crystals that have all grown together, interlocking each face into and tightly up against all adjacent mineral faces. This is consistent both with (for example) quartz to quartz grains and quartz to feldspar, mica, and what other mineral crystals present in the specimen. Looking closely at this tight interlocking where (again for example) a quartz grain lies up against, say, a feldspar grain, very clearly shown the two minerals meeting and pushing against each other as their respective crystals WERE GROWING. This very tight kind of meeting between two different substances CAN NOT be accomplished by geopolymer. Whether ground to a powder or some more corse aggregate, when the slurry dries or cures solid (as in modern concrete), 10X magnification will show the individual components relatively tightly up against each other, but there will be no trace of the type of meeting between the grains that only occurs when such grains are crystalizing, and, as they do so begin pushing against neighbor grains...actually inter-locking. At higher magnification this is thoroughly proven as these mate-ing surfaces will exhibit the tiny give-and-take of growing crystals pushing up against each other with much much more pressure than simply liquidized particles can achieve.

@Skinflaps_Meatslapper

3 жыл бұрын

Ah, there's some hope in the comment section after all

@jn7428

3 жыл бұрын

I was just gonna say this

@Ness2Alyza

3 жыл бұрын

Excellent!

@isee7668

3 жыл бұрын

Quite right. On a related topic which illustrates much the same point...Is glass a mineral?....www.e-education.psu.edu/earth520/node/1689

@Skinflaps_Meatslapper

3 жыл бұрын

@@isee7668 Amorphous is the key word there, and also the key difference between a brown lump of volcanic glass and granite.

I appreciate you making a valid point without condemning all other opinions, because who really knows anyhow.

@charlesbartlow8046

3 жыл бұрын

I do, I watched a guy use resonance to cut granite with a piece of copper tube and with a copper angle iron. It took a few hours to go an 2 inches but his setup was pretty basic. The copper tube created a cylinder hole with a perfect granite plug and granite wedge.

@MichaelReed609

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlesbartlow8046 link or source? I’m not finding it in a search.

@jimcarso7541

3 жыл бұрын

@@charlesbartlow8046 in

@Otmjv

3 жыл бұрын

@@penguinista a mechanism that creates resonance would also absolutely be doable with quite primative technology too.

I have been a machinist and precision welder. I have made and repaired many parts using many types of equipment. One used is EDM with a copper electrode they letirealy melt and shape the different material until complete. My experience in design and development of creating shapes has been in mold making. My thought is that many of these big granite rocks were done with sound vibration. Application of high frequency sound can duplicate similar results. Definitely a high frequency tool either hand held and mounted stable onto the outside flat square corners then able to apply the technology I CLAIM is what they used. Also it could have been instead been molecularily had it's molecules changed to become solidified to be molded into those shapes. I have years been studying this phenomenon and have come to my estimated beliefs. I have 50 years in the machine and metal trades. This topic is a spectacular study that keeps me studying and pondering.

I think sound frequency and or magnetic forces were used in all of these complex builds. You still need a block to manipulate and then do your crafting closer to the site. Closer to the beginning, people knew more that has been hid from us. Tesla was on the path.

I work in construction and I’m always fascinated by this subject. What I don’t understand is why some people refuse to believe that there was an ancient civilisation that existed on this planet that were far more technologically advanced than what we are today? It happened, they got wiped out by a global cataclysmic event, Yes we are in awe and clueless about how they did it and who these amazing people were. Thankfully they left amazing structures all over the world for people like us to gaze upon and respect their legacy. These builders were truly awesome. Fantastic work Ben

@AkarZaephyr

3 жыл бұрын

It's the same reason why mainstream science is so slow at accepting new facts contradicting decade-long beliefs - some of them are not interested in pursuing truth, they would rather sit on their asses and reap in benefits that come with scientific titles, rather than do some legwork. Let me give you an example, you'll laugh your ass off. In his "Magicians of the Gods" book, Graham Hancock paints a story of professor J Harlen Bretz, geologist in the 1920s. He many times visited Channeled Scablands in US, a feature that Bretz saw and based on his findings during his escapades there, he formed a theory of a massive flood that run through the area after continental glacier melted very abruptly and suddenly. He saw no other explanation for the destruction of basalt deposits in that area, cause it had no marks of eons of wind or water erosion. To put this into perspective, 1920s was a time when the most popular view of world was gradualism - the idea that all geological changes are slow and boring in nature, and they occur throughout millions of years. So for Bretz to come out and say some geological features of Channeled Scablands were formed literally in a matter of days made him a laughing stock of the academic world, and the word "catastrophist" thrown at him had a really demeaning sound to it. It wasn't until 1960's (!!!) that someone I cannot remember the name of right now, created a foundation and literally dragged the most vehement opponents of Bretz's theory (even bought them flight tickets!) to Channeled Scablands for a few days of field work, and showed them what Bretz saw nearly half a century earlier. They were all quiet and visibly perplexed, how can one not be if the evidence was a few hours of flight away for 40 years and they didn't even bother looking? "We are all catastrophists now", one of his opponents said. Geologist J. T. Pardee helped Bretz as he found evidence of an ancient glacial lake in North America, so Bretz and Pardee continued their work for over 30 years, gathering evidence meticulously. Wiki quote: "Bretz defended his theories, kicking off an acrimonious 40 year debate over the origin of the Scablands. As he wrote in 1928, "Ideas without precedent are generally looked upon with disfavor and men are shocked if their conceptions of an orderly world are challenged." I'll close this story with last Wiki quote: "National Geographic observes: "As philosopher Thomas Kuhn observed, new scientific truths often win the day not so much because opponents change their minds, but because they die off. By the time the Geological Society of America finally recognized Bretz’s work with the Penrose Medal, the field’s highest honor, it was 1979 and Bretz was 96 years old. He joked to his son, “All my enemies are dead, so I have no one to gloat over.”" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Harlen_Bretz This, my friend, is why some academic figures are not interested in truth - because to be an expert in a certain field, and to admit you were wrong your entire expert life, makes your credibility dive to the Mariana Trench, so they're more interested in keeping status quo rather than advancing our knowledge. Luckily, not all of them. Just enough of them to make people really interested in pursuing knowledge bounce off a wall from time to time. Which is sad. So when this very academia paints a theory as "fringe science", I need no further recommendations to at the very least read what it's about. Cause it sure ruffles their feathers. PS: Another reason is that most of academic world expects theory to be ready and proven, with all the facts brought to their beds together with breakfast, but in Bretz's case, even that didn't help so I skipped over that factor.

@MrTrooper74

3 жыл бұрын

@@AkarZaephyr thank you for your fantastic and informative response my friend. I have learned something new today and i am truly grateful. 💯🙏🏻

@jamesmcdonnell4583

3 жыл бұрын

K2019

@quentinstore1464

3 жыл бұрын

I agree, I’ve seen enough evidence of other ancient civilizations to convince me that we only have scratched the surface of what we know about the history of this planet.

@shakdidagalimal

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrTrooper74 Great. Now ask yourself where the tools used are and why none have been found. THIS is why so many do not believe it and could care less. Frankly, this FACT (if they aren't hiding ancient tech in the 3 letter agencies - which is doubtful due to 1800's texts/discoveries) leads one to another famous hypothesis: Aliens made these then took off with their high science.

Im a drywaller, i can do arch ways, but this is some far beyond advanced skill, the craftmanship makes me excited to be human. Its a big reminder of what we can do if we put our heart, soul and mind to creativity. I wish they documented thier work. I wonder if they use some sort of blue print

@ioma6

3 жыл бұрын

....some sort of blue print ??? Seriously ??? To realize such complicated structure, 3D or multi dimensional image. THEY did not just quory stone and cut in site withour a extremely acurate knoledge of architecture,math,material rezistance,astronomy and who knows many sciencies.

@PacificNorthwest360

3 жыл бұрын

I’m sure it was all documented, the Vatican has 50+ miles of book shelves that closed to the public.

@2msvalkyrie529

3 жыл бұрын

@ Wendell Check out the Broch at Carloway Isle of Lewis , Scotland. A drystone tower - double layer on the outside with several floors joined together with lintels . All dry stone.! Dates from Iron Age .( 100 BC - 100 A D )

Your videos exemplify the best use for the internet and KZread- exchanging culturally significant information to any and all. Thank you. At time stamp 21:07, discussing similarities with tomb below Menkaure and the tomb of Illahun...one thing not mentioned in the video is the slant/angle of the floor in Menkaure. Although in the floor, the angle seems to match the angle of the box found in Illahun, which sits on a level floor. Obvious questions arise; why is there a slant, whether in the floor or in the granite box, why was it done with the floor in one location and the box in another and is the box once located below Menkaure in a place where it can be examined? These construction efforts are significant- materials, human effort, finances, time, and indicate a specific necessity/purpose for the chambers and tunnels. The absence of decorative features and hieroglyphics, indicative of burial locations identifying the dead and their accomplishments, and nothing to suggest that this space was used for communal gatherings or living spaces...there must have been a utilitarian purpose. To me, the angles, slants and vast tunnel systems suggest a purpose related to fluid dynamics.

Every type of matter has it's own unique harmonic frequency signature. If you direct sound waves at an object at a certain frequency, you can disrupt the atomic bonds of that material. I find this extremely interesting. To provide some context as an example; Remember the bridge that was built in America? The one that started wobbling in the wind, so much so that it ended up destroying itself and falling into the river? The wind blowing against the bridge managed to resonate at the harmonic frequency of the bridge's material composition itself, and this started the bridge to vibrate, then oscillate and eventually collapse. It's likely that several sources of sound waves are directed at a convergence point, so as to intensify, amplify the resonance. I also believe that directing the converging waves from different directions can triangulate a "sweet spot" whereby resonance can be pinpointed, much like how lasers can 'cut' or 'burn' a specific location WITHIN a piece of resin, or glass. I think there is a technology, lost to us, that can do the same thing with stone, or in fact any material, since everything has a resonance frequency signature. I must point out here, that if the sound waves are precise enough, they can 'cut' away parts of material, like a saw can. Perhaps the actual cutting edge blades of these tools were actually made from sound waves themselves. Frequency, Sound, Vibration. Overlooked by modern science, suppressed by modern industry... (possibly because it threatens too much of our capitalist top-down system of wealth and class, by liberating us from manual labour, and therefore putting an end to a Human workforce, the working class). But that is a story for another day.

The inside of these boxes are incredible. The fact that they made the outer so square and flat are incredible. But the inside angles where the walls meet or the bottom corners are nuts to try and think about how it was done.

@LightningJackFlash

Жыл бұрын

Right, it amazes me so much too, how that can possibly be done...? The inner bottom corners, they are perfectly perpendicular, this is simply mind blowing how they could achieve that, I have no idea... Saws? The curiosity on that sucks me in, I need to take a breath :P

@gyros69420

Жыл бұрын

It’s amazing to think about. If an asteroid impact or pole shift shook the planet, sending tsunamis miles High, that circled the planet several times today, nothing would be left. Satellites would be the evidence of our past. If it happened 5,000 or 12,000 years ago perhaps, the only thing left would be the megalithic structures that were strong enough. Working with huge stone blocks isn’t really a thing anymore due to our lost methods and capitalism doesn’t really allow it, as it’s not cost effective; there’s no profit to me made. But back then they were heavily into it, and were damn good at it too. What id do to have a glimpse into our past.

@jeffreymcneal1507

Жыл бұрын

It is incredible. But are inability to conceive of the unremitting labor and devastating ability of ancient artisans does not mean it was done by some since vanished laser technology. Please, I beg Ben to show us one stinking shred of advanced technology beyond the wood, copper, and leather the Egyptians had on hand. And no, leave out the dolemite river stones (aka "possible ball bearings). Those round stones have been demonstrated, in the lab, to be able to whack out a "lost obelisk" with a two year time frame, leaving behind similar marks. Please. Just give us one alleged high tech ancient tool. In all those passageways, surely, not one fragment of a some advanced tooling? Not even a chip or a splinter???

@blacklotus5364

Жыл бұрын

​@@jeffreymcneal1507 The Egyptians didn't build the pyramids. The entire Giza site was already ancient and forgotten to the world when the Egyptians discovered it when they settled the region. So yeah, the Egyptians had nothing, as you say. But that's like me saying "I can't believe my cat is hungry today, because I went for a jog yesterday." It doesn't make any sense. Those two things are completely separate from each other, and one does not have any bearing on the other statement's truth.

@lagtastic7511

Жыл бұрын

@@blacklotus5364 Exactly With all the advances in tech we have made. And the ability too see how its more and more likely our ancestors were almost completely wiped out. Why is it so hard to believe that we were fairly advanced, and the fall meant we had to start back over. There is no shame in admitting we might be on a different technology path, or maybe even less advanced in some ways to our ancestors. It sure as hell looks to me, on the timeline, that the ancient Egyptians were trying to reverse engineer what they could, because they understood this. The truly evil part about the almost cult like push to stop us from understanding the past. Is that its preventing people from understanding we could be in the same position very easily. And working toward preventing that should be all our goal. Instead its just easier to pretend we are the be all and the end all.

Why in’s t any of these findings pointed out in school this is beyond mind blowing what they achieved and yet there called primitive

@jamesseeker1538

3 жыл бұрын

Look up why public schools were invented...hint: it's not to educate people

@trustme7660

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesseeker1538 I loved history when I was in high school it’s fascinating to learn about our past which is still a mystery. My views you can’t move forward unless you know where you’ve been

@steve-o6413

3 жыл бұрын

@@trustme7660 sure you can we are a Species of inventors, you know monkey see Monkey do. Even the animal kingdom uses tools and they don't have any written History...

@CarpeDiem23

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamesseeker1538 Yep, just to program them how to follow rules in system and believe in all served lies, also to weaken ability to criticize authorities..when someone is brainwashed from early age it's very hard to wake him up to truth

@616CC

3 жыл бұрын

Just ask them You won’t be surprised to hear from them - that they had no clue these pieces even existed. That’s why

These great pieces of masterful workmanship is a lot older than mainstream academics say they are by thousands of years

Thanks for a very stimulating and well-presented video. This granite box is indeed a masterful achievement. I worked in granite sculpture workshops in South India from 1997 to 2008. The tools and the techniques for carving idols have not changed much in hundreds of years, and they differ from those of Ancient Egypt principally through the use of tools made of iron/steel rather than copper. The workshop which I set up alongside the traditional workshops produced my own sculpture designs, and we also produced interior design items in stone: - baths, basins, shower trays, tables etc. These 'modern' items required dead-flat surfaces, irregular curves, and internal rectilinear conjunctions of planes. The hardest part is to polish the internal corners. I admire Egyptian sculpture, and I examine it close-up whenever I encounter a piece. Truly it is a wonder - and the granite box described in this video is exceptionally wonderful. However, we would not need power tools, diamond bits, carborundum polishing pads, or alien technology to produce it. There is nothing I have seen that could not be achieved with the tools and methods which the Ancient Egyptians actually possessed. The secret ingredient is not magical technology: it is time and patience. You cannot produce a shiny gloss finish on granite by hand polishing, but you can achieve an extremely smooth 'marled' or 'honed' finish, just like the finish on the top surfaces of the red granite box. I know, because I have instructed my craftsmen to do it and have watched it being done.

@filboe

11 ай бұрын

So you're insisting that the Egyptian relics were made with copper tools ?

@michaelkhalsa

5 ай бұрын

Was this in Mahabs (mahaballipuram)?

Great job Ben.

@DEV3N87

3 жыл бұрын

ayyye brien! love both of you guys channels. Plz keep it comin!

@brienfoerster

3 жыл бұрын

@@DEV3N87 Doing my best!

@DEV3N87

3 жыл бұрын

@@brienfoerster brien, do you think that granite box was built before or after the tunnel system leading up to it?

@brienfoerster

3 жыл бұрын

@@DEV3N87 Still watching it.

@bodystomp5302

3 жыл бұрын

You are the man, Brien.

As an Egyptian, Ive always been fascinated by the pyramid. The mystery surrounding them is almost magical due to the sheer awe that faces you when you contemplate the challenge that is solving some of those enigmas... How did they carved these rock? What purpose served the pyramids? How advanced were they ? Id give everything to go back in time and silently witness a day of the construction of one of those pyramids... The story of human civilization is formidable, Im afraid there are some questions that will be left without answers.

@michaelmeier9085

Жыл бұрын

Hi - what are egyptians thinking in general about all these things? Do they believe the official archaology?

@mwheezee

Жыл бұрын

​@@michaelmeier9085 most of us if not all were taught and indoctrinated in schools to believe the mainstream narrative, that is the pyramids were built as tombs for the Pharaohs during their reign to be housed in when dead. However, with the ease of access of information on the internet, some of us got exposed to alternative theories and hypotheses like the ones presented here on this channel and the likes of Graham Hancock, and are more willing to explore these narratives. Granted, most Egyptians are not fluent or even competent in English, and such ideas are not available on Arabic speaking channels, so alot of Egyptians may have never heard of them. I also have to add that with Freedom of expression and opinion being cracked on by the government, you can't expect any Egyptians to post videos in Arabic exploring these narratives.

@MutuaNdunda

Жыл бұрын

I must visit this ancient sites and see for myself. Documentaries are making me more curious. I'm from Kenya.

@gyros69420

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I agree I think it’s a tragedy we might never know. It’s sad most people are so fast to dismiss the unbelievable evidence for lost advanced civilisations, Simply because we don’t find plastic bags and semiconductors in the dirt

@jeffreymcneal1507

Жыл бұрын

As a schmo, who cannot draw a crooked line, it all looks pretty darned amazing to me. But Ben needs to give more air time to Russian archeologists, in the particular, who have repeatedly replicated many of the things Ben swears cannot be done with copper and wood. Um, excuse me, I'm not that clever, but some people are doing what Ben says cannot be done.

I have a theory about the layout of the room. It’s hard to believe that they made the tunnel go around the room with the tilted box just willy-nilly. There had to be a purpose. Considering that the tunnel goes nowhere but around the box, it may have been constructed for crowd control. Imagine a group of people going down to view whatever was in the box, where would they stand while waiting for the people in front of them to finish looking? And if there was no tunnel around for people to stand, then there would be a problem for people leaving because of people standing in the way. Also, because the box is tilted, viewing what was in it would be more accessible to short people, too, like children. Perhaps this was a viewing room for the bodies of the Royal family when they died for the masses to pay their last respects. That is, the box wasn’t made for just one person, but many famous people of the era when they died. Just a thought. I thoroughly enjoy your videos.

Allignment with the help of stars can be done at the moment of builing the tomb/ piramide while stars were still visable and the room did not have a ceiling yet

For some reason, just seeing those perfect arched pieces of granite and of course the box gives me goosebumps. And the tunnel looping around for some reason. Whatever technology the maker had is unimaginable.

@bigmichael6156

Жыл бұрын

that technology was called slavery and religion. fear is the best motivator

@jeffreymcneal1507

Жыл бұрын

Mr. Wicked, we need to imagine. We need Ben to give more air time to those who have replicated some of the very things he says cannot be done with copper. Ben is dismissive, but he is not thorough.

@prototypeo1404

Жыл бұрын

@@jeffreymcneal1507 Well, wouldn't that hurt the "unreplicatable" claims?

To get the north / south alignment, all I can think of is if the roof was once open before the pyramid was build over top. Also the arched ceiling looks like a perfect radius which in itself is more complex than the box, imagine the difficulty in creating multiple ton radius blocks perfectly joined together. Just incredible!

@iandalziel7405

3 жыл бұрын

Also a curved ceiling would take a vertical load of rubble and fill better...

I think it's a machine built for function. One guess is that it could have been a healing, meditation, or even a life extension chamber where the occupant would float in the salt water and somehow because of the layout and construction, the surrounding energies were directed in such a way to have been imparted into the tub.

@TRICK-OR-TREAT236

5 ай бұрын

WOW ! I WAS THINKING EXACTLY THE SAME THING DUDE. 😂 🤣 😂🙃😂🤣😂

I am an aerospace engineer I work with these measuring tools that’s these gentleman used to measure the vase and this is mind boggling I wish I could show you the look of my face as these numbers were revealed. I am struggling to wrap my head around how this is even remotely possible for a vase over 5000 years old. If you’re a skeptic of ancient lost technology that’s fine but I am a numbers guy-I go off hard evidence and numbers don’t lie..The math doesn’t lie..This is truly amazing. I wish I knew how this was done, and honestly how any human could do this by hand without some sort of lost technology that we haven’t figured out yet. I just don’t understand how this work was done back then and we have not discovered ANY evidence of the tools used to do this work! This opens up another rabbit hole in my head that I cannot sink further into because it is to mind boggling haha! Great work gentleman! Discovered the channel and subscribed.

When looking at modern constructions, small alcoves (like the one halfway down the stairs where you came in at the start of the video) are usually added for utilities like air-conditioning controls and/or electric circuitry boxes/panels. Corridors surrounding a chamber are probably also utility corridors for adding whatever the builders needed that corridor for. See extra corridors in metro systems or utility tunnels underneath modern-day cities for access to electricity and gas services. When you have a chamber that contains a major utility that could need repairing or adding things, it's best you have corridors and pathways that give access to that chamber. Planning is what it's all about.

@hawaiisidecar

3 жыл бұрын

Good thoughts.

@steve-o6413

3 жыл бұрын

If those service shafts supply both Energy and delivery Systems they wouldn't need to be much bigger than the box itself...

@alwayscurious413

3 жыл бұрын

That's some great thought. The London underground seems to be riddled with what we call 'cubby holes' that were built for a purpose just where they needed it. Whatever explanation that anyone comes up with for that loop section - it sure seems like a waste of time to go to all that effort without any purpose that we know of.

@EliteRock

3 жыл бұрын

Exactly. People's imaginations tend to fail when contemplating the enormous period of time that's elapsed since these structures and objects were made. Only stonework has survived thousands of years of the elements and human scavenging, there is almost no trace of any other materials that were used (not least metals). What we're looking at are the 'bare bones' of _machines._ How anyone can look at, for example, the inside of the GP or the pyramid complex at Teotihuacan and not recognise them as such is beyond me

@EliteRock

3 жыл бұрын

BTW, if you've ever watched the movie _Forbidden Planet,_ the great machine complexes left by the long-dead _'Krell'_ always reminded me of the cylopean ruins here on Earth, I sometimes wonder if the writers were, consciously or not, inspired by them. That aspect of the film gave me the same sense of pathos I often feel when I see these fantastical ancient ruins and objects.

I'm continually amazed by the sofistication of the artifacts found around the world that are obviously highly engineered

@80milekyle70

3 жыл бұрын

I love that this channel exists. The more people that know, the more people that might get interested, and that's great.

@chrissibersky4617

2 жыл бұрын

It's made by knocking a round rock against the stone they wanted to shape to obelisks, statues, pyramids, sarcophags etc.

@dogwklr

2 жыл бұрын

Yea, all with copper chisels. Let's go throw up a pyramid in a few weekends. Few beers and some work, easy peasy 👀

@PaulBrown-uj5le

2 жыл бұрын

@@80milekyle70 but he's batshit crazy half the time.

@petero9732

2 жыл бұрын

ź

I've learnt so much daily the last cpl of yrs about ancient civilisations and learning new things thanks to your channel..only difference is that your actually there videoing it..Cool stuff thanks mate...Ironically I live in Petrie North Brisbane!

The way you film, and your camera or something, the editing combined with the commentary, I've never seen such great work, and the feeling of being there. Like others have said, I've never seen anything like this on KZread or TV before, it's really cool. I'm glad I found this channel!

We will never know what the granite boxes were used for, I could imagine a different use . I am not convinced boxes like this were used as coffins for the dead..

@asdf3568

3 жыл бұрын

They were most likely used to guide their spirits to the afterlife. They were then taken out and buried somewhere else.

@charlesvanderhoog7056

3 жыл бұрын

You are right. I see a lot of baloney in the comments that does not come above the most primitive superstition level, not different from "lightning is what you see when Thor throws his hammer from the sky". The remarkable thing is that int he old days, e.g. of Herodot and others, people were rather practical about all this. Apparently, not any more.

@charleychansays1723

3 жыл бұрын

MAYBE A BATH TUB FOR THE QUEEN IN THE AFTER LIFE, REALLY ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. 👍👁👁👽👽👽

@jamesnolan6450

3 жыл бұрын

Probably a chest that's been ransacked

@liquidstar9

3 жыл бұрын

i don't see any religious reason being enough to warrant cutting a 20 ton airtight lid off the main block to seal the enclosure. they weren't idiots; techniques that looked impressive but saved on labor were used where it was warranted. i only see functional reasons for having such things on the giant stone boxes. and since a fair number of the large stone boxes have been found submerged, it makes me wonder if that wasn't part of the original design, a box that would remain sealed under its own weight underwater. whatever originally went inside, it seems laughable to me that they could construct the great pyramid and the valley of the kings, and still feel it necessary to put 20 ton lids over bull or human carcasses. to me that says they were repurposed during dynastic times, but originally constructed for something else.

One aspect of archaeology that I particularly love is its mission to understand findings rather than using them to prove an ad hoc theory. This approach ensures that we remain objective in our interpretations and avoid imposing our own biases on the evidence. In this regard, I would like to draw attention to the similarities between the granite chamber and the Barabar Caves in India. Both structures share similar materials and ratios, suggesting a possible connection in their original purpose. By focusing on understanding these findings, we can explore various possibilities regarding their purpose. Were they used for religious rituals, as tombs, perhaps as storage chambers or industrial applications? Without preconceived notions or theories guiding our interpretations, we can approach these questions with an open mind. I truly appreciate this approach of archaeology that prioritizes understanding over proving ad hoc theories. The similarities between the granite chambers all over the world highlight how similar materials may indicate shared purposes across different ancient structures. By embracing this mindset, archaeologists can continue unraveling the mysteries of our past with objectivity and intellectual curiosity.

2 Questions: (just throwing it out there) 1) How is it possible to cut granite like that? With tools from ANY era. Waterjet? Metal blade rotation? Highly abrasive thread that acts like a blade? (Like fishing line through wet clay) A high powered plasma beam of some kind? What are the options that we humans today can come up with to explain that precision? 2) Is there ANY record of any of these tools that were used. Example some hieroglyph that refers to a tool that made cuts to rock. These objects are there. What is not, are the tools used. And not even corollaries, proxy indications or side effects of the tools, like say metallurgy, or equipment that could have been used to make these cuts.

Why is no one questioning the slight tilt of the allegedly "sarcophagi"? Everything is constructed with an ultra high level of precision and these "boxes" aren't level? It must have had a purpose.

@harvardarchaeologydept3799

2 жыл бұрын

Gonna have to ask the blacks back then when it was constructed. That 140 degree sunlight only one race can live in. Ethiopian blacks like the greeks said did it.

@kyledrake7313

2 жыл бұрын

@@harvardarchaeologydept3799 are you really that insane?

@Astrochronic

2 жыл бұрын

@@kyledrake7313 what did he say that is insane?

@stretchnuts4661

2 жыл бұрын

@@harvardarchaeologydept3799 hey Mr "Harvard" when this was made this area wasn't a desert it was a massive rain forest so that theory doesn't match, maybe you should check out the water erosion theories on the sphinx

@nobytes2

2 жыл бұрын

@@harvardarchaeologydept3799 wtf are you smoking? 🚬😂

to me the "gods" of Egypt were the ones who came before, stories of them passed down eventually became religion. These are the people with the skills to make these things

@scottyfox6376

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I can go along with your assessment. How does a civilization appear with incredible mechanical skills only to degrade in abilities over time ?

@jacquelineloveselvis

3 жыл бұрын

Yes I agree. Every culture around the world has stories about the time before. I bet there is much hidden beneath the sands which we are still unaware of.

@Corfield81

3 жыл бұрын

@@scottyfox6376 I believe they got wiped out by some cataclysm, few remained to pass down stories and maybe be the gods who called themselves Ra etc . Didn't degrade just restarted. If we got hit by a cataclysm now and only a small amount of us remained , I for one wouldn't know how to make a computer chip we'd need to reinvent if those people with the knowledge died

@kevin8poison142

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, knowledge would be lost in one lifetime.New children would have no conception of such devices as they have never experienced them.Knowledge and accounts of such times would have to be written in stone to last for future reference. Proper analyses and open mind towards these structures is way to go.

@terrabyte911

3 жыл бұрын

You're right. Every culture has stories, legends of these 'Gods'. Atlantis, Lemura, Mu, Og, The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Mahabharata are just a few examples of 'Gods' that had not only the power of flight but a masterful understanding of the solar system and the universe. All dismissed by mainstream academia as stories or fables. 40 years ago the solar system was thought to be the only place that had planets, now we are finding them orbiting almost every star. Academia has a very arrogant and closed attitude and anyone who does not follow the narrative is dismissed and labelled a crackpot. Evidence of ancient high technology is all over Egypt and the rest of the world and historians just ignore it. Shame on you!

As a tile setter of 30 years, and have worked with so much stone over the years, that work is absolutely insane. Even with today’s equipment you will have a job to do that and not even show a blade mark.

Ben is awesome. Some of the best if not the best content about ancient Egypt available on the internet. I saw him on Joe Rogan and more recently on the Andrew Schulz KZread podcast. Absolutely mind blowing. Informative and fun to watch. His theorys hold up and make sense. Keep up the great work mate.

The overcuts in hard stone should be enough evidence for any sane person to rethink what they know.. if the stone was shaped by meticulously cutting the stone over months by master craftsmen then why would they spend days worth of work overcutting into the stone

@Diesel-gp2zz

3 жыл бұрын

Very good thinking mate!!! did not thougth about that!

@thesundog8833

3 жыл бұрын

Keep going...!!

@joeweatherstone4770

3 жыл бұрын

It's much easier if you think of building a precision form and then filling it with "liquid granite". The main problem is the "liquid granite" that we are only now developing with geopolymer science,

@redwoodcoast

3 жыл бұрын

​@@joeweatherstone4770 The granite used to create such absolultely perfect objects was not liquid. It was softened, molecularly using advanced technology involving hyper-intense vibration at the resonant frequency of the granite. That altered it in a manner that rendered it plasticine in nature, and in that state it could be pressed into a mold as one can press clay into a mold. It would not have been heated so prohibitive heat would not have been present.

It’s amazing that over 100 years ago he could accurately measure that box with just lit fire torches in that room! The work that some of these people did 100 years back is absolutely amazing!

@jjano2320

3 жыл бұрын

That's what i was thinking but who the hell knows what they had.

@jaswats9645

3 жыл бұрын

They may have had gas or blubber lamps. Lo quality for sure.

@-C.S.R

3 жыл бұрын

@@jaswats9645 Oh yeah duh! Good call!

@antonioperezsimal4065

3 жыл бұрын

@@jaswats9645 High tech to build but low tech to illuminate? Sounds weird bro!

@jaswats9645

3 жыл бұрын

@@antonioperezsimal4065 Not sure what you meant. Gas and other fat fueled lamps are pretty simple.

Thank you for this wonderful video. In terms of machines there are already machine marks discovert in rocks in Egypt. The question is how came this box at it's place? The answer is the bricked walls show that there are still uncovert cavities behind them and from there the box came.

you say it is aligned to the points of the compass - i would like to have seen a compass laying on top of the box. thanks for this great video.

Great stuff. As a Chemist (though not a geochemist), I certainly agree about the nature of the granite. The crystal sizes within the rock are very much dependent on cooling extremely slowly underground. It could not be fabricated by humans at the surface in any reasonable time frame.

@StarShippCaptain

3 жыл бұрын

Great comment. Thanks!

@johnpinckney7269

2 жыл бұрын

Granite is an igneous rock. The crystal size is an indication of cooling rates. Smaller the crystals faster the cooling. The crystals and relatively small.

@albertmagician8613

2 жыл бұрын

Even if it were a composite material that does nothing to explain the precision.

@davepowell7168

2 жыл бұрын

Depth defining pressure, which compresses most mica, quartz or feldspar?

That curved ceiling of quarter circle-cut granite blocks is more impressive than the box.

Just wanted to thank you directly for allowing those of us who really want to tour the real stuff and see what it’s like and try to fathom the true goings on but can’t make it to the sites. Thank you. It’s some of the best material anywhere to actually see what it’s like to be there.

@Particleman50

7 ай бұрын

Get off your wallet and get to those sites, man!

There’s an ostrich egg that was found with the three pyramids carved on it. It came out of a tomb that was over 7000 years old. There’s a good possibility that these artifacts were not made by Egyptians but a civilization that was far older and more advanced than the Egyptians. If this box was made by hand sanding multiple people spent their entire adult life’s making it.

@johngoodrich1282

2 жыл бұрын

civilization*

@richardcoram1562

2 жыл бұрын

Craig Scott I was just looking around on the tube and read about a prehistoric site on a Island. The technology, calendar, architecture hieroglyphics, etv; looked very much like Aztec artifacts. Anyway its interesting, because many kinds of "dating" of the soils and artifacts have been done since the 1950s up to late '80s. Out of these- ,three groups of scientist published the report that this place dates to as far back as 350,000 years. It appears that even the archeologist community and experts fought to stop the publications of those findings because it throws a huge wrench in human/modern man theory. I think the pyramids are of alien construction., and possibly a service station to refuel their craft. A Ship Stop Oasis - Gas- N - Eat and far more advanced than the 350k dated find or Aztek.The find was under volcanic materials.

@craigthescott5074

2 жыл бұрын

@@richardcoram1562 yes Richard very interesting. I think even modern archeologists now are doubting the dates that have been used by scientists since the 1800’s. The pyramids for me date back to before the end of the last ice age. 12000 years ago. Personally I don’t believe the Egyptians built them they don’t match up to structures with hieroglyphs from 3000 years ago. In fact none of the pyramids have any hieroglyphs in them. Some engineers now believe they were some kind of machines. Possibly power plants or hydrogen plants or even microwave plants? I think even the Egyptians now are doubting they built them.

@craigthescott5074

2 жыл бұрын

@@doniamer2009 yea Doni you probably should learn some history before talking out your ass.

@garrettjennings8197

2 жыл бұрын

@@doniamer2009 Not very bright are you?

I just watched an you tube video of an inside corner being cut out in granite cut out square by a crafts person with stone on stone impacting and hand polishing with sand. They stopped short of finish polishing mirror smooth by hand. The point was.... it was square on all planes. The fact that it takes skilled crafts people many hours to work is something we can't grasp. The fact that lower level apprentices take a piece to a certain state before the masters step in to bring it to the last stage before hand polishing occurs where apprentices finish the polished look. It is amazing how level and flush you can get a surface when it is set in a large pool of water and the water level is raised and lowered to the surfaces you are working on. Even the inside corners of a box. Put it on its side. You can create smaller, lighter granite referance standards. Just like rulers,flat edges and squares. They knew those principles. Yes heavy, yes time consuming, yes some work got damage and was discarded or used elsewhere. We simply can't grasp the incredible man hours it takes to achieve that level of mastery and of human endeavor. Why hand craft when a machine, that is designed to do the same hand work mechanically and very fast is way easier. That machine design, material, metallurgy, engineering, manufacturing processes took 1000 years of human collective, documenting trial and error to master. Writing, documenting was the key. These techniques were lost. The pictures on the walls that survived did not do them justice, could not covey the applied knowledge of Master to apprentice that was build of direct intergenerational transfer. The meaning of the Mayan writing system was lost in 2 generations because it wasn't directly transfered from a master to an apprentice in their single lifetimes. The same applies here. Use it or we lose it.

It would be interesting to get a laser mapping of the interior of the overcut you show near timestamp 27:14 to get a view of the interior base of the cut and see if there are arced depressions hinting at a circular saw type blade going a bit deeper at any point and get an idea of the precision of the depth angle as its withdrawn.

Makes me happy when I see people like you in the world. Logical, open minded and not only about money. It gives me hope! Great work and keep it up! 😀❤️

I have not been to Egypt since the 1970's and I found this fantastically interesting and thought provoking. Thank you for posting.

Either they used some high frequency heating methods that made the material softer and moldable or some dedicated craftsman/men spent a lot of time and care to make it.

Melted granite being exposed to the air would look like muddy glass and be very brittle. We should give these ancient crafts men more credit for being the truest of stone masons.

Younger Egyptian engineers are now taking a lively interest in doing their own measurements of these artifacts.

@rockjockchick

Жыл бұрын

That is wonderful!

@Dragon-Slay3r

Жыл бұрын

Is this because he banned tablighis? What about the light C and the dark rectangle at the bottom. Didn't the swimmer get to swim to the Hq? It was the cover for st magerets road didn't that help ? 😭

@Dragon-Slay3r

Жыл бұрын

Oh was this the pike swimming out with the salmon cover from that day? 😭

Isn't it odd that the principle of the arch seen here, wasn't used (or else no examples survived) in any above ground structures ? Mystery upon mystery upon mysteries abound everywhere. I've only discovered you in the last 6 months or so Uncharted X. Thank you for the gift of all this renewed awe. It's done an almost jaded soul great good.

10:00... That loop would be a good way for the architect to prove how skilled they were with determining directions while underground. Which might have been pretty important if the placement of the coffin was vital. To me that seemed more impressive than the coffin itself. I mean, those tunnels are lined up with the poles, etc. AND it looks like if you were to put a perfect square over the tunnels all the sides would line up with the top tunnel perfectly splitting the top half and ending in the exact center of the square. That is quite a signature for the architect.