The Most Destructive Weapon the US Can Sneak into Any Country

Ғылым және технология

The scenario was clear: as the Cold War turns hot, a field of warfare, eerily quiet yet tense, stretches before a small team of American soldiers.
Under a heavy sky, they hastily set up a newly developed weapon, their movements precise yet urgent. The recoilles rifle system, named the Davy Crockett, is aimed at a distant target: a Soviet tank.
Once the weapon is set, the team pulls the firing chord and runs at full speed.
As they sprint away, the air is thick with the unspoken truth: the Davy Crockett is more than just a rifle; it is the world's smallest nuclear weapon.
A powerful tool in their arsenal, with the Davy, nuclear abilities were now at the fingertips of even the smallest military units.
Today, the use of nuclear weapons is understood only as a last resort. Yet, back in the 1950s, amidst a frosty atmosphere of global tension, the rules were different, and the Davy Crockett epitomized a readiness to cross the boundaries of the unthinkable.

Пікірлер: 199

  • @sundragon7703
    @sundragon77034 ай бұрын

    Omitted the most symbolic bullet point of the life of Davy Crockett. He died at Battle of the Alamo. So, naming the weapon was poetic.

  • @skullyblue619

    @skullyblue619

    4 ай бұрын

    Absolutely and a bit suicidal but hey war is not for pussies.

  • @SalvadorSanchez-hq9hn

    @SalvadorSanchez-hq9hn

    4 ай бұрын

    You satanists have wierd heros

  • @sholoms

    @sholoms

    4 ай бұрын

    Also maybe well suited for a new Disney World ride, if maybe Mouse Co. & Ronny D put together some kind of Cartoon Golf in the Keys Treaty Organizaion...

  • @Aaron-zu3xn

    @Aaron-zu3xn

    4 ай бұрын

    yeah you're not meant to survive having to deploy this it's to stop tanks coming at you over open territory with nothing to stop them

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh4 ай бұрын

    I don't think the new troops would think crewing the weapon would be a wise career choice.

  • @johnwillis4706
    @johnwillis47064 ай бұрын

    The Davy Crockett had a fatal flaw, it lacked to range to get the nuke far enough away to avoid the fallout. So, it, like all nukes, are weapons of mutually assured destruction.

  • @user-FUCKYOU18

    @user-FUCKYOU18

    4 ай бұрын

    You can put some wings on it ,to glide it target

  • @rickcratty6335
    @rickcratty63354 ай бұрын

    Was called the SADM, special atomic demolition munition. Man portable, sorta. Hot, so don't spend a lot of time holding it.

  • @mr_brass_monkey

    @mr_brass_monkey

    4 ай бұрын

    it's the Davy Crockett no got time for all that

  • @proteusnz99

    @proteusnz99

    4 ай бұрын

    The SADM were more like nuclear land mines, designed to be emplaced on critical structures such as bridges or tunnels, to be detonated if overrun by enemy advances, to channel them into killing zones. Davy Crockett was to be lobbed towards the enemy. I think it was the same basic warhead as used in the USAF AIM-2 Genie (also test fired once) or the 155mm artillery round.

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh4 ай бұрын

    I had a high school buddy that jiuned the US Army and was deployed to Germany serving on a 155 self propell arty unit. I believe he was in the Fulda Gap area. He told me they were equipped with nuke shells to be fired if the Soviet armor overran the Gap. Each week one guy was picked to fire the shell while everyone retreated. The high probability of the powder charge, big enough to send the shell down range could result in zero survival. If survival was achieved the dumb-a$$ was tasked with destroying any ammo/equipment. Suffice to say that he had a boring deployment and no stories. There was the story about guys manning a listening post along the frontier that smoked to much Afghany hash one day and put a toilet seat wrapped in aluminum foil on the roof of their bunker. East German helicopters kept flying by taking photos.

  • @ssaraccoii

    @ssaraccoii

    4 ай бұрын

    But boy did they eat well! Nobody knew who had the shell, or whether it was self-propelled, or just a standard towed 155. It just bumped along the back trails with a security contingent.

  • @misterbig9025

    @misterbig9025

    4 ай бұрын

    Your buddy had too much hash

  • @tmseh

    @tmseh

    4 ай бұрын

    @@misterbig9025 Yes, he did.

  • @johnwingate4965
    @johnwingate49654 ай бұрын

    3:00 That looks remarkably like the Overdrive Unit used on some British cars in the 60’s and 70’s 8^)

  • @CatDad01

    @CatDad01

    4 ай бұрын

    I came here to say hold the fuck up i see planetary gearsets and friction bands lmao. Thats a damn automatic transmission.

  • @johnwingate4965

    @johnwingate4965

    4 ай бұрын

    @@CatDad01 yeah - the overdrive units used a diff set and band clutch

  • @user-je5do6jn2f
    @user-je5do6jn2f4 ай бұрын

    Sadly, this is the closest we came to the M42 Fatman from Fallout...

  • @shengyi1701

    @shengyi1701

    4 ай бұрын

    M42 fat man i believe

  • @user-je5do6jn2f

    @user-je5do6jn2f

    4 ай бұрын

    Thanks

  • @fl00fydragon

    @fl00fydragon

    3 ай бұрын

    Fortunately you mean You really missed the entire message and point of the fallout series.

  • @oneshotme
    @oneshotme4 ай бұрын

    I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

  • @tmseh
    @tmseh4 ай бұрын

    We do have the "Specials" suit case nukes that, while not as potent, are a ninja nuke to be escorted to the target and set and forget.

  • @almirria6753
    @almirria67534 ай бұрын

    Here is a very scary thought mount this system to an M50 "Ontos" [the Marine Corps just called it the Thing] For a 6 barreld firing platform

  • @freesk8
    @freesk84 ай бұрын

    Davy Crocket died at the Alamo. I wonder if this was to call to mind the idea that those who fired this weapon would die in the action.

  • @johndeesmith183
    @johndeesmith1834 ай бұрын

    ... I wonder how many of these toys made it into private collections ... ?

  • @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd
    @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd4 ай бұрын

    I'd read about it before but this is the first time I've seen films of it in action obviously they ought to have devoted more research and thought to the project before fielding it but having lived through it I know the pressures of the cold war were intense⚛😀

  • @The67wheelman
    @The67wheelman4 ай бұрын

    They Should have used it before the Soviets poisoned our bodily fluids……hopefully someone notices that reference 😂

  • @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd

    @FrankOdonnell-ej3hd

    4 ай бұрын

    my fav film of all time dr strange love⚛😀

  • @dennisyoung4631

    @dennisyoung4631

    4 ай бұрын

    Yes, *Lovely Fluorides!*

  • @mickkelly6389

    @mickkelly6389

    4 ай бұрын

    Or trump

  • @WesternUranus
    @WesternUranus4 ай бұрын

    I remember Colonel Volgin using it in Tselinoyarsk

  • @numatic1485
    @numatic14854 ай бұрын

    Columbus, Georgia USA has a "National Infantry Museum" that has one of these on display. Highly Recommended to visit.

  • @SalvadorSanchez-hq9hn

    @SalvadorSanchez-hq9hn

    4 ай бұрын

    The Americans are so brave and always afraid it's hilarious

  • @numatic1485

    @numatic1485

    4 ай бұрын

    @@SalvadorSanchez-hq9hn you're from where? El Salvadore? yeah you got not no wins in history, try again.

  • @petercunningham3469
    @petercunningham34694 ай бұрын

    It's all gravey when you've got Davey 😊

  • @lastofmygeneration
    @lastofmygeneration4 ай бұрын

    It was pretty damn awesome seeing this weapon used in metal gear solid 3.

  • @kenibnanak5554
    @kenibnanak55544 ай бұрын

    What some people who had Davy Crocketts told me they planned to do was hook up electronic firing solenoids from an M73 tank coax gun and attach a half mile of phone line so they could remote fire the Davy Crocketts..

  • @phild8095
    @phild80954 ай бұрын

    I had an uncle that served in West Germany in the early 60's. He crewed one of the M65 atomic cannon, Atomic Annie. He died young of cancer.

  • @aislemontecristo
    @aislemontecristo3 ай бұрын

    Wonder if the delivery system could be used for another type of munitions. Placing a hyperbaric payload in it might be useful in clearing the area ahead of the troops.

  • @richardmeo2503
    @richardmeo25034 ай бұрын

    To force an end to the Korean War, Ike let it be known that our new nuclear artillery shells and canon were in service and headed to Japan. He warned the Communists that peace would come by summer, one way or another. The REDS realized that there mass attacks and fortified hills would be obliterated one at a time. And there was nothing they could do. The ceasefire was signed in June 53.

  • @roberthurley8366
    @roberthurley83664 ай бұрын

    Something about sneaking into another country....yet doesn't mention anything about a stealth aircraft carrying nukes..... just a single nuke on a small rocket

  • @jmichna1

    @jmichna1

    4 ай бұрын

    At the time of the Davy Crockett's development, stealth aircraft were still a thing of the future.

  • @roberthurley8366

    @roberthurley8366

    4 ай бұрын

    @@jmichna1 coughs SR-71 was being developed and it's technically first generation stealth....plus the associated drones and A-10 precursor aircraft

  • @jmichna1

    @jmichna1

    4 ай бұрын

    @@roberthurley8366 Davy Crockett development started in '57 and was operational and deployed in '61. Lockheed's A10 never saw service; its descendant the A12 first flew in April '62 and wasn't even delivered to the USAF/CIA until starting in '63. SR71 came after the A12. Neither the A12 or the SR71 was equipped to carry munitions. "Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed" by Ben Rich covers all the Lockheed development work, including their work on stealth technology. Cough, cough.

  • @rapidthrash1964
    @rapidthrash19644 ай бұрын

    "My rifle shoots 50 mm rounds." "My rifle shoots nukes."

  • @warlord8954
    @warlord89544 ай бұрын

    The Davey Crockett system was retired.

  • @rickpilhorn
    @rickpilhorn4 ай бұрын

    There is one of these in the National Infantry Museum at Ft Moore GA (formally Ft Benning).

  • @numatic1485

    @numatic1485

    4 ай бұрын

    haha as I scrolled down I saw that you said the same thing I said, it's not on base though.

  • @rickpilhorn

    @rickpilhorn

    4 ай бұрын

    @@numatic1485 Not anymore. you are correct. But when I was a kid it was. In an old ass white building. Now it's in the same building as the IMAX theatre. Good on you for knowing.

  • @numatic1485

    @numatic1485

    4 ай бұрын

    @@rickpilhorn man I did so much work on Ft Benning.. we wired up the pop up targets for the tank ranges, went the the Burger King right outside the drop towers... hell I even went to "The Drop Zone" used to be a restaurant. we worked right underneath it near the armory. I got story's man.

  • @rickpilhorn

    @rickpilhorn

    4 ай бұрын

    @@numatic1485 I know that BK well. And those towers from Airborne school too. I remember the Drop Zone but never went.

  • @numatic1485

    @numatic1485

    4 ай бұрын

    @@rickpilhorn man you are a legend! stay safe brother!

  • @ynptrip
    @ynptrip4 ай бұрын

    "The Most Destructive Weapon the US Can Sneak into Any Country" - that would be a B-2 with a bellyfull of B83 bombs.

  • @LinusJohansson-yu7cy
    @LinusJohansson-yu7cy4 ай бұрын

    Imagine having a misfire with that thing, or have the round only travel a few feet before hitting the ground... 💀 Would be pretty bad! Shoulder-firing a nuke would be pretty badass however! 😁

  • @johnstreet797

    @johnstreet797

    4 ай бұрын

    since the blast radius was bigger than the throw distance of the launch charge, this was not a really popular weapon system with the troops

  • @BeyondtheRailz
    @BeyondtheRailz4 ай бұрын

    Well, it's not a secret if you're posting about it.

  • @nicktechnubyte1184
    @nicktechnubyte11844 ай бұрын

    What about the nuclear hand grenade?!

  • @berylrosenberg704

    @berylrosenberg704

    4 ай бұрын

    That is the Terminator's power pack. Cyberdyne does not allow that!

  • @mred8002

    @mred8002

    4 ай бұрын

    Starship Troopers? Don’t think they have the export license for that device yet.

  • @tmseh

    @tmseh

    4 ай бұрын

    Dear God. Extreme fragging of the A-hole LT.

  • @CattleCarDriver

    @CattleCarDriver

    4 ай бұрын

    Impossible to get good data on effectiveness... makes a hole 40 feet across and most testers can only throw it twenty feet...

  • @Myungbean

    @Myungbean

    4 ай бұрын

    Lol is this serious?

  • @Robertlynschultz
    @Robertlynschultz4 ай бұрын

    These were NOT the smallest deployed atomic weapons... the XM129 and XM159 SADM (Special Atomic Demolition Munition) and was carried by a Special Combat Engineer, MOS 12E. It was freak'n manportable and deployed by a man.

  • @AZAce1064
    @AZAce10644 ай бұрын

    I wouldn’t want to be the soldier using it in battle for the 1st time. Heroes are not always what we read about in the newspaper.

  • @PHelsing
    @PHelsing4 ай бұрын

    I don't want to set the world on fire I just want to start A flame in your heart In my heart, I have but one desire And that one is you No other will do I've lost all ambition For worldly acclaim I just want to be the one you love And with your admission That you feel the same I'll have reached the goal I'm dreaming of Believe me i know you've read it in that voice 🤣

  • @kalleklp7291
    @kalleklp72913 ай бұрын

    The USSR knew very well they would get leveled if they dropped a nuclear bomb on the US or Allied countries (NATO). The US made the mistake of thinking the USSR had more weapons and manpower than they actually had. Fun fact: The US helped the USSR with safety systems to make their bombs more secure. Neither side was interested in an all-out nuclear war because of an accidental launch. After a near incident in the Cuba crisis of 1961a "hotline" was established so both parties could talk with each other BEFORE any incident or after an accidental launch. The David Crockett system was not a viable option as it didn't reach the safe distance where friendly groups were not exposed to fallout.

  • @cr-qo3ov
    @cr-qo3ov2 ай бұрын

    That would have been nothing but insanity and cruel

  • @cr-qo3ov
    @cr-qo3ov2 ай бұрын

    If you don't develop it your enemies will

  • @carsonafarino5999
    @carsonafarino59994 ай бұрын

    Davy Crockett love that thing

  • @baldieman64
    @baldieman644 ай бұрын

    8:10 That's either wrong or insane! Surely they weren't watching a nuke go off from 852m away wearing nothing more than goggles and a shirt!

  • @tpniefer

    @tpniefer

    4 ай бұрын

    They brushed up on their duck and cover lessons. Instead of squirming under a desk they squirmed under the bleachers they were sitting on.

  • @alanbravender347
    @alanbravender3474 ай бұрын

    What ever happened to those “missing” backpack nukes ?

  • @CerebralEnema
    @CerebralEnema4 ай бұрын

    Note that this was the smallest nuke back in the 1950s….

  • @dwayneklien5308
    @dwayneklien53084 ай бұрын

    What many current people didn't realize, back in the late 1950's to late 1970's, the Russian military outnumbered us 100 to 1 or more and could have steamed rolled over us serving in Europe at the time, since the Russians knew it would take 72 hours or more for reinforcements to arrive from stateside. Our unit was to destroy Fulda Gap bridge to slow them down until our reinforcements could arrive. Those were scary times.

  • @Neobert5240
    @Neobert52404 ай бұрын

    War is ugly

  • @deanfirnatine7814
    @deanfirnatine78144 ай бұрын

    Most advanced nuclear states had/have these mini nukes, the Soviets/Russians had/have so called suitcase nukes they could smuggle into an enemy country, the Russian military after the fall of the Soviet Union informed us several of these "suitcase" nukes had gone missing. The current Russian military developed what they call Club K's, four missiles on a launcher inside what looks like just a standard shipping container but lead lined so nuclear "sniffer" systems cannot detect them, these "shipping" containers can be smuggled into any enemy countries port then theoretically shipped all over right up to within easy striking distance of any enemy target and remotely launched.

  • @Joe_1sr9
    @Joe_1sr92 ай бұрын

    The voiceover on these videos is great. I think it’s a human 😊

  • @hobbyhermit66
    @hobbyhermit664 ай бұрын

    I guess being sneaked in makes it an unclear weapon.

  • @donnyboon2896
    @donnyboon28964 ай бұрын

    Yes

  • @mimetype
    @mimetype4 ай бұрын

    That's from the 50s.... What about the nuclear BB?

  • @mickgibson370

    @mickgibson370

    4 ай бұрын

    I would believe it would be antimatter with a contained magnetic field. I believe that would take out New York City and they could use on today!

  • @Haywire-Alguire
    @Haywire-Alguire4 ай бұрын

    If that thing malfunfunctioned, your fucked !

  • @ssaraccoii
    @ssaraccoii4 ай бұрын

    Actually, the Davy Crockett was disassembled decades ago.

  • @thebarkingmouse
    @thebarkingmouse4 ай бұрын

    Well given the B2 and B21, we can sneak quite a lot more destructive weapons into any country.

  • @0Turbox
    @0Turbox4 ай бұрын

    "Let's run from an atomic blast".

  • @poodlescone9700

    @poodlescone9700

    4 ай бұрын

    Worked for Indiana Jones.

  • @0Turbox

    @0Turbox

    4 ай бұрын

    @@poodlescone9700 Cameraman was close.

  • @auro1986
    @auro19864 ай бұрын

    it's a bloody mortar that shoots little atom bombs

  • @dachunde
    @dachunde4 ай бұрын

    The United States military will never need to sneak in to deploy a nuclear weapon. 😊

  • @JamesKonzek-xr5zy
    @JamesKonzek-xr5zy4 ай бұрын

    What could possibly go wrong?

  • @proteusnz99
    @proteusnz994 ай бұрын

    Well, yes, the Davy Crockett, very much the nuclear hand grenade. The scenario, a Jeep with a recoilless rifle, 3 or 4 warheads, a sergeant and a driver careening around Europe, positive control on weapon release? I don’t think so. Just because you can doesn’t mean you should.

  • @SB-ie8jn
    @SB-ie8jn4 ай бұрын

    I believe I saw this in the fallout game.

  • @CatDad01
    @CatDad014 ай бұрын

    .... I'm sorry was that a schematic for a automatic transmission lol

  • @tlmoller
    @tlmoller4 ай бұрын

    I think the 155mm nuclear artillery granat is more interesting. I am not sure it still exist but did in three 1980.

  • @JamesKonzek-xr5zy

    @JamesKonzek-xr5zy

    4 ай бұрын

    I think they may have used one in the final scene in Return of the Living Dead.

  • @GPski
    @GPski4 ай бұрын

    Wow the nuclear hand grenade -- lethality range 5000kilometers throwing range 35 meters...

  • @mikeneill6813

    @mikeneill6813

    4 ай бұрын

    Back to the drawing board.

  • @politicsuncensored5617
    @politicsuncensored56174 ай бұрын

    I think any soldier assigned to use this cannon would have loved for the creators of the gun have to be with them if/when they ever had to use it. I'm glad the weapon never had to be used. Shalom

  • @mikeneill6813

    @mikeneill6813

    4 ай бұрын

    Did those guys have any "special" insurance policies set up by the Army?.

  • @albinoviper2876
    @albinoviper28764 ай бұрын

    YEAH know how thinking changed? Pres Regan and Gorbachev watched the ABC Monday Night Movie "The Day After" in 1983 i watched it as a 11 yr old 4yrs into getting into politics as a interest. IT SCARED EVERYONE not like "War of the Worlds" back in the day but it shook up everyone.

  • @johnyaniuk1254
    @johnyaniuk12544 ай бұрын

    West Germany wanted some a few short years after WW II. I mean, what could possibly go wrong?

  • @user-FUCKYOU18
    @user-FUCKYOU184 ай бұрын

    Like a nuclear "hell canon" syria Civil war

  • @michaelpipkin9942
    @michaelpipkin99424 ай бұрын

    That doesn't look safe.......

  • @michaelbarfield528
    @michaelbarfield5284 ай бұрын

    How could you reach minimum safe distance once it was fired?

  • @phaztheaussiebastard

    @phaztheaussiebastard

    4 ай бұрын

    flying was the preferred method, but seeing as they didn't have planes they probably just ran

  • @CH-bn7qb

    @CH-bn7qb

    4 ай бұрын

    You don’t 😂

  • @BassieKuiper
    @BassieKuiper4 ай бұрын

    Davy crokett

  • @soulife8383
    @soulife83834 ай бұрын

    We learn nothing from our past

  • @mikeneill6813

    @mikeneill6813

    4 ай бұрын

    And always lofty plans for the future.

  • @Paulftate
    @Paulftate4 ай бұрын

  • @radeksparowski7174
    @radeksparowski71744 ай бұрын

    versus backpack nukes or poseidon nuclear torpedo that can create a mega tsunami.......

  • @vegarhl
    @vegarhl4 ай бұрын

    Now we're talking "home defense" 😄 get off my lawn

  • @goatman3828
    @goatman38284 ай бұрын

    Riddle me just HOW the US can sneak this into any battlefield? It is a footnote in history, yet somehow they are ready to be snuck into battle 6 decades later? Sure if this was on the Soviet's side. They can mount them to their T-55 tanks they are now having to use, but the USA isn't relying on 60 year old technology like Pooty-poot has to.

  • @dennisyoung4631
    @dennisyoung46314 ай бұрын

    Yes, *the Holy Fallout.* (one of the “planet of the apes” movies)

  • @michaelturner5050
    @michaelturner50504 ай бұрын

    I own one of these

  • @shanequeen5003
    @shanequeen50034 ай бұрын

    That's implying they could still use it

  • @tmseh

    @tmseh

    4 ай бұрын

    True.

  • @shanequeen5003

    @shanequeen5003

    4 ай бұрын

    @@tmseh false flag Ukraine

  • @Fraser-369
    @Fraser-3694 ай бұрын

    Still a concern? They WANT it to happen

  • @mikeneill6813

    @mikeneill6813

    4 ай бұрын

    Kim Wrong Un is just itchin' to "try" one out.

  • @arthurdent1097
    @arthurdent10974 ай бұрын

    yay, misleading click bait title 🤨

  • @dieselboy610
    @dieselboy6104 ай бұрын

    Davy Rocket

  • @oljimeagle6779
    @oljimeagle677922 күн бұрын

    Nuke mines!?

  • @WmDuck-gj9mx
    @WmDuck-gj9mx25 күн бұрын

    Yet another waste of resources .

  • @KHANAGE1311
    @KHANAGE13114 ай бұрын

    Mental... 🤦‍♂️

  • @kuzinit2374
    @kuzinit23743 ай бұрын

    This is what Hillary was selling at Bengazzi, one was used in Beruit port bombing

  • @CreatureOTNight
    @CreatureOTNight4 ай бұрын

    I'm surprised Ukaine hasn't been given these concidering the use of first world war trenchs.

  • @MaxKrumholz
    @MaxKrumholz4 ай бұрын

    not Good enough

  • @Stopovergarding
    @Stopovergarding4 ай бұрын

    You Probably are Just to Young To Remember these didn't Work due to the wind can Change Direction an Wipe out your Whole Forse ... Eh Americans 😂

  • @nighttow8780
    @nighttow87804 ай бұрын

    All nuclear weapons are portable. If they were not, how would you use them against your enemies?

  • @thornie123

    @thornie123

    4 ай бұрын

    I guess he means able to be moved by men or a vehicle and not a plane

  • @killerbern666
    @killerbern6664 ай бұрын

    what a stupid idea 🤣

  • @richardtibbetts574
    @richardtibbetts5744 ай бұрын

    Whatever happened to the slogan “Loose Lips Sink Ships”? Thanks for pointing this out to our potential enemies.

  • @worldwanderer91
    @worldwanderer914 ай бұрын

    5th place comment

  • @MultiGangus
    @MultiGangus4 ай бұрын

    What about my x wife?

  • @mikeneill6813

    @mikeneill6813

    4 ай бұрын

    You wouldn't wudja. Your'e EVIL. 😊

  • @Votexforxme
    @Votexforxme3 ай бұрын

    the most destructive weapon is wokeness.

  • @anthonyburke5656
    @anthonyburke56564 ай бұрын

    Hopefully this “weapon” has been consigned to the scrap heap. But, in cynical appreciation of the military mind, you just know the military have them stashed in an Armoury somewhere. Additionally, the CIA will have a few stashed offshore as well.

  • @curbyourshi1056
    @curbyourshi10564 ай бұрын

    As soon as any adversary uses any nuclear weapon, however small, the use of them becomes "allowed" or even obligatory. Cool weapon, developed by people who have an uncanny ability to never think things through to a logical conclusion. Probably the manufacturers of said weapon, who undoubtedly suffered from billions in cost overruns etc.

  • @axeman999
    @axeman9994 ай бұрын

    Don't waste your time. "Nuclear Artillery".....

  • @liyumarketshopping
    @liyumarketshopping4 ай бұрын

    Guys with engineering or physics know how ... just high school level can tell this thing doesn't make sense ... 🤪🤪🤪

  • @FeldwebelWolfenstool
    @FeldwebelWolfenstool4 ай бұрын

    11:50 ...Is that photo faked? If so, why? Misrepresentation is disgusting. Stick to the fact, Jack... or I seek entertainment elsewhere...

  • @johndeesmith183

    @johndeesmith183

    4 ай бұрын

    Yeah , I have never seen this anywhere else , I believe it's faked by someone with a agenda

  • @johndeesmith183

    @johndeesmith183

    4 ай бұрын

    ... give him a thumbs down for this one

  • @nmclaren1980
    @nmclaren19804 ай бұрын

    More lies

  • @maxrobespierre9176
    @maxrobespierre91764 ай бұрын

    So in short, the USA fits not believe in the sovereignty of other nations. Well, that completely undermines our reason for being in Ukraine.

  • @7071t6
    @7071t64 ай бұрын

    I have seen seals with portable underwater nuclear mines, so they could use them out of the water as well?🦘🦘👌👌✌✌👍👍

Келесі