I do not know whether I can go to Delhi or not in my life time. But this man in grey is a fading gem. He should be preserved. Like the way he explains the things It's beyond any remark. This is from West Begnal. Sir take love 🎉 and Anand Prakash sir is also another gem. If I could deal of their stagnancy in exchange of anything.#mephistopheles
@literatureandhistory12193 жыл бұрын
A lecture worth remembering the whole. Attractive presentation.
@affindagrettylapasam36123 жыл бұрын
Thank you for providing these lectures... God bless.
@user-uy4jc3zz5p3 жыл бұрын
I Really enjoyed these Sessions!
@Draxtor2 жыл бұрын
thank you this is just absolute gold! THANK YOU from Germany :)))
@romangul7105 жыл бұрын
A lecture fantastically arranged is really worth-listening. Abundance thanks to you sir! from Pakistan
@mehmoodsafi7894
3 жыл бұрын
Inka B.A Hamari PHD
@aminaaleem23323 жыл бұрын
Bundle of thanks and respect for you sir
@bluebells12393 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤ Simple & Innocent manner
@sanjaysahu72644 жыл бұрын
Very significant lecture.
@talatperween57375 жыл бұрын
Literature is beautifully designed with history
@debashismitra28394 жыл бұрын
Wish to have lectures on Masculinity Studies
@manabmedhi342 жыл бұрын
Excellent speech Sir🙏🙏
@mpsharma8412 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for modernist movement
@garimasingh46592 жыл бұрын
Nice literature. 👌👌
@sikhakumari63532 жыл бұрын
You are the best
@IftikharAhmed-uf1dl6 жыл бұрын
How can I get his new history of english literature. I am from Pakistan.
@literatureandhistory12193 жыл бұрын
Greetings from Sindh
@rajashreesail54003 жыл бұрын
Good👍
@rasooljabbar68773 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@mohdilyas74736 жыл бұрын
Series is very useful
@rominarashid93793 жыл бұрын
Prof Dahiya is an institution in himself.
@arifhussainigps7543 жыл бұрын
good
@devp33434 жыл бұрын
i no longer unstand to modern philosophic thinking?
@jayasrijayapal22143 жыл бұрын
What Is that name of the woman author who remarked on the 1st world war
@parvathypbaiju7067
2 жыл бұрын
Willa Cather
@shantanusingh37114 жыл бұрын
In abroad nhi hota hai ma'am
@binukj7970
3 жыл бұрын
You noticed that!
@shantanusingh3711
3 жыл бұрын
@@binukj7970 yes Where are you from ?
@ihsanurrehman81123 жыл бұрын
Can be listend at the speed of 2
@taniapetrova24538 жыл бұрын
This lecture is misguiding and very subjective... The lecturer gives statements and opinions without any facts. Whilst it is true that the Modernist movement is controversial, in its core lies the concept of a look into our inner world, rather than the outer one - a world which until then was masked by unquestionable dogmas and rules. What one felt, what one did, was seen through the lens of religion, of good and evil. Human behavior, therefore, was rigidly classified as either good or evil, without a grey area of any kind. The man-governed world, which was firstly created through mythology and then indoctrinated by religions, was now collapsing. Freud's psychoanalysis turned the attention from the external world which is conceptually governed by god, to the internal world which in fact governs our lives - our consciousness, our choices and values, our thoughts and emotions. I completely disagree with Barthes' 'Death of the Author', but I do acknowledge that attention must be paid to texts, their structure, form, figurative and narrative techniques, but of course, the author cannot be simply disregarded. In addition, stating that Nietzsche's 'the death of God' concept simply meant that 'god has abandoned us' is way too vague and misleading. I am not his supporter, but I believe he posed some fundamental issues that until then society turned a blind eye to.
@narayanamarather5393
5 жыл бұрын
IT IS NOT WISE TO SAY THAT HE IS MISLEADING. BUT I AGREE WITH YOUR OBSERVATIONS MENTIONED IN LATER PART
@tinkuverma1846
3 жыл бұрын
The first sentence of your comment seems to be affected by prejudice of self-praising. It means you are trying to grab the attention of viewers that is why you wrote a comment against the lecturer. One more thing that i would like to attend your attention i.e, you started your comment from criticizing him that shows your ignorance and incapibility to comprehend the thing. You like to learn not analyze the thing. That shows your level of understanding.
@ziahameed2065
2 жыл бұрын
@@tinkuverma1846 but is she (tania) right? Or not?
@Anita-sw9hu
Жыл бұрын
He sgares his education and experience with regard to modern movement ,he has documented fact in his history books with due references,yes ,blind religiosity too is anti science and reason ,we should respond to criticism clearly and reasonably and avoid indulging in mutual recrimination,at this age he makes efforts to accord first hand knowledge about a turbulent,less discussed age , notorious for wars 🙏🙏.
@diguification4 ай бұрын
Slow, repetitive, mechanical, uninspiring, juvenile, parochial, disconnected. Can't understand all the praise. This guy didn't do ANY justice to this awesome topic. Get someone with knowledge and real scholarship.
Пікірлер: 38
Great summary of history of English literature
I do not know whether I can go to Delhi or not in my life time. But this man in grey is a fading gem. He should be preserved. Like the way he explains the things It's beyond any remark. This is from West Begnal. Sir take love 🎉 and Anand Prakash sir is also another gem. If I could deal of their stagnancy in exchange of anything.#mephistopheles
A lecture worth remembering the whole. Attractive presentation.
Thank you for providing these lectures... God bless.
I Really enjoyed these Sessions!
thank you this is just absolute gold! THANK YOU from Germany :)))
A lecture fantastically arranged is really worth-listening. Abundance thanks to you sir! from Pakistan
@mehmoodsafi7894
3 жыл бұрын
Inka B.A Hamari PHD
Bundle of thanks and respect for you sir
❤❤❤ Simple & Innocent manner
Very significant lecture.
Literature is beautifully designed with history
Wish to have lectures on Masculinity Studies
Excellent speech Sir🙏🙏
Thanks for modernist movement
Nice literature. 👌👌
You are the best
How can I get his new history of english literature. I am from Pakistan.
Greetings from Sindh
Good👍
Thanks
Series is very useful
Prof Dahiya is an institution in himself.
good
i no longer unstand to modern philosophic thinking?
What Is that name of the woman author who remarked on the 1st world war
@parvathypbaiju7067
2 жыл бұрын
Willa Cather
In abroad nhi hota hai ma'am
@binukj7970
3 жыл бұрын
You noticed that!
@shantanusingh3711
3 жыл бұрын
@@binukj7970 yes Where are you from ?
Can be listend at the speed of 2
This lecture is misguiding and very subjective... The lecturer gives statements and opinions without any facts. Whilst it is true that the Modernist movement is controversial, in its core lies the concept of a look into our inner world, rather than the outer one - a world which until then was masked by unquestionable dogmas and rules. What one felt, what one did, was seen through the lens of religion, of good and evil. Human behavior, therefore, was rigidly classified as either good or evil, without a grey area of any kind. The man-governed world, which was firstly created through mythology and then indoctrinated by religions, was now collapsing. Freud's psychoanalysis turned the attention from the external world which is conceptually governed by god, to the internal world which in fact governs our lives - our consciousness, our choices and values, our thoughts and emotions. I completely disagree with Barthes' 'Death of the Author', but I do acknowledge that attention must be paid to texts, their structure, form, figurative and narrative techniques, but of course, the author cannot be simply disregarded. In addition, stating that Nietzsche's 'the death of God' concept simply meant that 'god has abandoned us' is way too vague and misleading. I am not his supporter, but I believe he posed some fundamental issues that until then society turned a blind eye to.
@narayanamarather5393
5 жыл бұрын
IT IS NOT WISE TO SAY THAT HE IS MISLEADING. BUT I AGREE WITH YOUR OBSERVATIONS MENTIONED IN LATER PART
@tinkuverma1846
3 жыл бұрын
The first sentence of your comment seems to be affected by prejudice of self-praising. It means you are trying to grab the attention of viewers that is why you wrote a comment against the lecturer. One more thing that i would like to attend your attention i.e, you started your comment from criticizing him that shows your ignorance and incapibility to comprehend the thing. You like to learn not analyze the thing. That shows your level of understanding.
@ziahameed2065
2 жыл бұрын
@@tinkuverma1846 but is she (tania) right? Or not?
@Anita-sw9hu
Жыл бұрын
He sgares his education and experience with regard to modern movement ,he has documented fact in his history books with due references,yes ,blind religiosity too is anti science and reason ,we should respond to criticism clearly and reasonably and avoid indulging in mutual recrimination,at this age he makes efforts to accord first hand knowledge about a turbulent,less discussed age , notorious for wars 🙏🙏.
Slow, repetitive, mechanical, uninspiring, juvenile, parochial, disconnected. Can't understand all the praise. This guy didn't do ANY justice to this awesome topic. Get someone with knowledge and real scholarship.