The moral of the story is never underestimate children's inability to know when enough is enough.

@claycord333

Жыл бұрын

💀

@holl7w

Жыл бұрын

He never explained it. He stretched the video so he can be monetized.

@ottergauze

Жыл бұрын

@@holl7w money is good, yes

@webpombo7765

Жыл бұрын

@@holl7w Not really, nowadays optimal youtube time to monetize as much as possible is 8 minutes, it is no longer 10 minutes.

@BobRossCat

Жыл бұрын

@@holl7w no, if it was 8 minutes if would be that.

The quick "You don't want to know the answer" when showing the third tetrations definitely caught me off guard. Not sure if it was just me but that was hilarious.

@user-qh5jk1mn5i

Жыл бұрын

wait until you hear about pentation, repeated tetration

@firstnameiskowitz8493

Жыл бұрын

@@user-qh5jk1mn5i Hexation: hold my beer

@Cessated

Жыл бұрын

@@firstnameiskowitz8493 10{x}10:

@Cessated

Жыл бұрын

oh right gₓ too

@tylert528

Жыл бұрын

@@user-qh5jk1mn5i **endless stairwell has joined the chat**

I like it when full numbers are shown, I feel like it makes them more meaningful. It also makes it more legible for certain languages because of spaces, eg in Estonian you'd see "413 tuh vaatamist" instead of "413K views", which is kind of hard to see on first glance.

@markusTegelane

Жыл бұрын

Maybe they could do something like what they did with the like/dislike bar, where you could see the precise number of likes/dislikes if you hovered the mouse cursor over the ratio bar (at least they did that before removing public dislike count). Or they could make it a toggle in KZread settings for those who prefer it.

@namethathasntbeentakenyetm3682

Жыл бұрын

I prefer MLG Gaming to ML Gaming.

@tostitossssss

Жыл бұрын

@@namethathasntbeentakenyetm3682 ermmmmm... but that actually is repetitive sooooooooooo...

@tweer64

Жыл бұрын

@@namethathasntbeentakenyetm3682 Major League Gaming Gaming?

@CraftyMasterman

Жыл бұрын

elo rebane

I momentarily had a crisis when I tried coming to terms with how much watch time Baby Shark has. 7.57 centuries collectively. All spent watching Baby Shark.

@cinnamoncat8950

Жыл бұрын

Truly the worst timeline

@windowsxpmemesandstufflol

Жыл бұрын

Wait, you know the average view duration of Baby Shark?

@EZX280

Жыл бұрын

@@windowsxpmemesandstufflol It's probably assuming that every person watched until the end. Which most kids (target audience) do.

@windowsxpmemesandstufflol

Жыл бұрын

@@EZX280 most videos have a big drop right after the start, I'd think it will have a 80% avg, view duration at most rather than 9x%

@strtrm2406

Жыл бұрын

I don't think that figure is right, it's actually much *worse*. With 11bn views and 136 second runtime, assuming everyone watched it to the end, the actual total watch time is (11e9 * 136) / (86400 * 365.2425 * 100) = ~470 centuries.

*Bonus fact* : Tetration is such a mysterious operation that no one knows how we should properly extend it to decimal inputs. We know that 3 tetrated by 3 would be 7625597484987, 2 tetrated by 4 would be 65536, and 100 tetrated by 100 would be [ERROR], but we're not sure what 2 tetrated by 0.5 would be, or 5 tetrated by 1.2. There's just not enough properties we've found to define them.

@alexpotts6520

Жыл бұрын

Bonus bonus fact: although tetration cannot be extended to fractional inputs, it can (in a somewhat limited way) be extended to *infinite* inputs. For a certain range of numbers between about 0.06 and 1.44, you can tetrate those numbers to the power of infinity and get a sensible answer out.

@General12th

Жыл бұрын

Tetration also generally doesn't have a well-defined inverse operator. And, of course, they don't work very well on non-integer inputs. I've always wondered if tetration is mysterious because nobody's managed to define it yet or if it's because it's fundamentally _undefinable._ Maybe there's some proof from the 1930s proving that tetration can't be extended like exponentials can and that's the end of that.

@fantiscious

Жыл бұрын

@@General12th Well I have heard of something called "Kneser's Solution", and it's been shown to be the only extension to satisfy some criteria that we have. I think the real issue is that there are too many other suggested extensions, and ALL of them are too complicated to understand in layman's terms (this is just my guess though, i am not a math major yet)

@subscheme

Жыл бұрын

@@General12th I’ve herd about superlogarithms I think they’re the inverse of tetration

@asj3419

Жыл бұрын

so if log (x^y) = y*log(x) => log(a↑↑b) = a↑↑(b-1)*log(a) then 100↑↑100 would be a 1 followed by 100↑↑99 zeroes. Probably too big to fit in a youtube comment.

if there are ~2 billion parents with internet access (if my math is correct), then the average parent has watched baby shark 5 times

@reeeedst53

Жыл бұрын

it definitely makes sense

@diedie865

Жыл бұрын

in democratic countries

@purrplaysLE

Жыл бұрын

That assumes only parents watch that video.

@zerotwoisreal

Жыл бұрын

the average view bot you mean

@TeamSprocket

Жыл бұрын

@@diedie865 undemocratic countries also have internet

Even though this was a "shower thought" video, I've found it really interesting! So cool to see how the metrics are truncated.

@greggregoryst7126

Жыл бұрын

Not "even though", but "thanks to"

@RafaelFerreira-sg1ki

Жыл бұрын

Mano tu tá até aqui hahah. Parece q sempre encontro seus comentários em todos os vídeos q vejo

In KZread Germany view count numbers to outsiders seem to be showing accurately up to 999,999, after which there is x.y million for numbers above 10^6 and then xy million for numbers above 10^7 IIRC KZread used to just append ,000 here for thousands in Germany, probably because the "K" for thousand is not that established in the German language. But I think people might have gotten confused by that, so they changed it to exact numbers up to 999,999. note: I used a comma [,] in this comment for the thousands separator, but in German we actually use a dot [.]

@Polynom1995

Жыл бұрын

I have seen 'T' for thousand instead of 'K' in some places before, but it's still uncommon. They could have use 'Tsd.' though, wich is more common, can't be confused and would be in line with the 'Mio.' and 'Mrd.' for Million and Billion.

@alesonbrjk

Жыл бұрын

in brazil we see K as mil because well mil is what a thousand is and its just a 3 letter word

@asheep7797

Жыл бұрын

@@Polynom1995 mrd = milliard?

@Polynom1995

Жыл бұрын

@@asheep7797 Yes. 1 Milliarde (german) = 1 Billion (english); also 1 Billion (german) = 1 Trillion (english) which can be confusing

@kopie1158

Жыл бұрын

@@Polynom1995 that usually isn't for "thousand" but for a different word starting with T Tisíc, Tysiąc, Тисяча, Тысяча, Tisoč.....

5:22 In fact, if you switch your language to an East Asian language on KZread, the pattern of the number of significant figures changes, as digits are grouped by 萬/万/만 (10000) instead of K (1000): 1234 views stays as 1234, 12345 views is truncated to 1.2萬, 123456 views is truncated to 12萬, 1234567 views becomes 123萬, 12345678 views becomes 1234萬, and so on. Additionally, (at least) some Indian languages have another different digit grouping system so likely something different happens if you switch to one of those languages.

@MeesterTweester

Жыл бұрын

I recently learned some Indian languages don't count digits in groups of three, interesting

@universe1879

Жыл бұрын

in Chinese writing 萬 means 10K so it gets kinda complicated when we need to convey a few tens of thousands to foreigners and since 億 is the largest common unit and it means 100M (we do not have a character for million or billion it is also odd to convey to Chinese people

@padraicfanning7055

Жыл бұрын

​@@universe1879 In English, the word _myriad_ used to mean "ten thousand".

@universe1879

Жыл бұрын

@@padraicfanning7055 oh, but it's not that common y'know

@Firefly256

Жыл бұрын

@@universe1879 English uses a new word for every 3 numbers while Chinese does it for every 4 numbers For example, 1451826891 in English would be separated to 1, 451, 826, 891. So it would be pronounced as “1 trillion 451 billion 826 million and 891” 1451826891 in Chinese would be separated to 14, 5182, 6891. So it would be pronounced as “14億 5182萬 6891”

I wonder, if Baby Shark were allowed to run ads, and had been for the entire length of its existence on KZread, how much money in ad revenue would it have made?

@Jwellsuhhuh

Жыл бұрын

There are ads… or maybe it’s just KZread doing their dirty business putting ads on unmonitized videos

@nyancat.123

Жыл бұрын

H o l y s h i t

@hiimemily

Жыл бұрын

17 cents.

@GGsquared

Жыл бұрын

At least 10 million I’d bet, considering it’s a family friendly video and the whole “made for kids” thing was only put into effect 2 years ago

@Naleksuh

Жыл бұрын

@@Jwellsuhhuh Yeah idk what this guy is on about, it does have ads. Also, KZread doesn't put ads on videos chooses not to monetize, only ads on videos for creators who are not in YPP

tbh baby shark is stuck in an endless loop of views generating cause parents play this video to feed their kids or to entertain them cause it attracts kids and keeps them addicted. and they choose this video out of all the videos since this is the most popular one. this forms that loop

@copter2000

Жыл бұрын

It could've been the duck song.

@SurmenianSoldier

Жыл бұрын

@@copter2000 Do you have any grapes?

@Anonymous-df8it

Жыл бұрын

Yeah, I was wondering why it had so many views. Just memorise the lyrics, damn it!

9:17 "They're using 5 characters, to represent a 4-digit number" Yes, but 4 digit-numbers are also often written using 5 characters because of a thousand-separator (digit grouping)

@gdmomie2954

Жыл бұрын

yes but then they would give more information so that's why it's weird

"If we have that third number anyways, might as well make it useful" Lets hope youtube doesn't catch onto the fact that there is still something they can ruin left

This is probably the most important thing happening right now

I remember the good ol' days when Gangnam Style was the first video ever to reach 1 billion views and we were all impressed. It even had a cute little animation next to the view count to celebrate

The truncation process is really useful in idle games that grow their numbers into exponential growth after a decent amount of time. So yeah there's gaming applications to these numbers

@sHooIT

Жыл бұрын

Or for the incremental genre where your numbers grow exponentially as soon as you click one button

“that is as much precision as youtube could possibly give as there’s no such thing as a fractional view” *splits myself into thirds*

@th1v5

Жыл бұрын

@Dungeons & Dragons 🅥 get outta here bot

@drearyplane8259

Жыл бұрын

@@th1v5 God I hate those things

@user-fb7ln4dw6y

Жыл бұрын

@Dungeons & Dragons 🅥 Leave

@the4spaceconstantstetraqua886

Жыл бұрын

Well you're still on one device, one press of tthe play button at a time.

@miiwii

Жыл бұрын

if you split yourself into thirds that would just mean 3 views

That's an interesting topic. Nothing to do with AI or any project of your own, but it was still very fun to watch. I'm still baffled at baby shark being so popular though. Sure, it's only 1.x views per person averaging the world, but there's only 2.6 billion users on KZread ("only") so that's 3.8 views per person, and on such a large scale with most viewers only watching once or not at all, there must be kids watching literally hundreds or even thousands of times to make up for it.

@beatraad

Жыл бұрын

Once you have kids who grow up with internet access, you’ll understand!

@catmacopter8545

Жыл бұрын

And also the many many users with multiple people using them, and the non-users also watching!

@malumy

Жыл бұрын

It is pretty horrifying to think that a lot of children grow up like this

@MayorVideo

Жыл бұрын

there's also probably some viewbotting

@jblen

Жыл бұрын

@@MayorVideo viewbotting doesn't get to this level. Not to mention because it's for children they probably make no money off it anyway. I mean we're talking millions daily, so consistently that it could reach 10,000 millions, which if it was 1 million a day would take 27 years but instead it's only been 3 or 4

0:57 “what about taking numbers to the third titration?” I've seen worse

@diegoadriandanielarce2211

5 ай бұрын

Like Graham's number

@LT_Productions1

12 күн бұрын

And pentations, hexations, and so on.

@kirbss1316

2 күн бұрын

also bfb background

how is this man the only guy who can get me interested in this stuff

@stanisdeadprobably

Жыл бұрын

@Dungeons & Dragons 🅥 imagine if it actually was here

@garfield2804

Жыл бұрын

hey vsauce

@kgratia4748

Жыл бұрын

@Томмуlnnit 🅥 DCDA, stupid bots.

@pr1mpy

Ай бұрын

because he made bfdi

I have my KZread interface set to German (Germany), and I don’t have this; my view counts up until 999,999 have ALL sigfigs anywhere on the site (this video popped up in my recommendations as having, well, 162,202 views). Starting with one million, it’s as shown in this video. Weird!

When looking at the inconsistency and superficial illogic of how KZread does it, it's important to consider that the primary concern for this kind of design is visual appearance (both legibility and aesthetics). Regarding the inconsistency between subscriber and view counts, it makes sense for them to be displayed differently because they appear in different parts of the page. The subscriber count isn't surrounded by much other information, so it can afford to be a little more verbose, and subscriptions are harder to achieve than views, so each one "means" more and it's worth displaying with a little more precision. The shortened view counts, on the other hand, tend to appear in lists which are fairly dense with information, which is why keeping them easily legible at a glance is a priority. The view count of the current video is displayed in a completely separate easily identifiable area, so it can afford to have full precision without making things too confusing. Regarding the apparent illogic of using an abbreviation that consists of more characters than the raw number, again I think the result makes sense from a design perspective. The objective isn't to minimize the bytes used, it's the minimize the screen space used while maximizing the legibility. The decimal separator may be an extra byte of HTML, but a video streaming site is hardly in the business of scrounging individual bytes of saved bandwidth here and there, and it takes a fraction of the space a digit would have (also consider that where raw numbers are displayed, they use thousand separators, so it may not even be a character saving at all). And I feel like the order of magnitude suffix (or whatever you call the trailing K/M/B) is readily visually separable, meaning it's primarily the number of digits the user is seeing that impact on information overload/legibility/however you want to put it. Anyway, fun video!

@ToriKo_

Жыл бұрын

Great comment. YTs way intuitively made sense to me, but it’s nice to be able to hear and articulate now that that reason was because of purposeful design choices by a company that spends a lot of time and money on design choices

@Anonymous-df8it

Жыл бұрын

No. 2.72K and 272X can both be written in the same amount of space, only one provides more precision. So, it might not *_save_* space, but it doesn't hurt to gain a little more precision

@TheJamesM

Жыл бұрын

@@Anonymous-df8it I have no hard science to back this up, but I feel like I naturally parse the magnitude suffix separately than the digits. The cognitive load (miniscule though it is) is smaller if there's fewer numerical digits. 2.72K feels like less to take in than 2728 to me, and I don't feel the added precision is of particular interest in that context. On the video page it's appropriate, but elsewhere I think it would seem pedantic.

@TurretBot

Жыл бұрын

KZread doesn't truncate sub counts for aesthetics, they do it to protect big KZread from mass unsubscription protests.

I've never thought about this before (besides thinking it's weird that the channel page doesn't show the full sub count), but this was still a very interesting and entertaining video. Great work as always, Cary!

Can we all please take a moment to praise the animator for his astonishing work of syncing the mouth movements to the speech?! That must have taken ages!

i love these types of videos, thanks cary! now i know i'm not the only one who is fascinated by the way youtube trunctuates their numbers!

2:37 it's bfbs exit in the background :D

I thought you were going to dissect that song, why the song is mathematically addictive. I know that there's a mathematical formula to make an earworm song.

@MichaelDarrow-tr1mn

8 ай бұрын

standard music theory is not math

I thought the metric would've been "repeat viewers" or "people who only watch x type of content" and now I really want to know some of that.

@marceltelang7825

Жыл бұрын

the repeat viewers would be high for any music video and almost all of them are music (if you can count annoying kid songs as music).

Reminds me of idle games (Cookie Clicker, e.g.) where after you play long enough you start losing significant figures in all the costs and stats, which is fascinating because it doesn’t make the games any less playable when this happens - the less-significant figures _literally don’t matter_ at that point!

interestingly, under the east asian system (using 万 and 億 for 10,000 and 100,000,000) you can get up to four sig figs, so even if one day baby shark has 100 billion views, the view count to outside observers will still go up every 100 million views in east asia

Also, I just wanted to say, on the topic of measuring growth, I've been following you since about 4 years ago, and it's been amazing seeing you grow and get the recognition you deserve, from a relatively niche small channel to something than can regularly get videos in the algorithm. Good work man!

Children are the most powerful viewbots. I almost wish I could return to that, being able to rewatch the same thing 50 times and still finding it enthralling.

Cary shower thoughts are more interesting than my life

@CallMeThyme

Жыл бұрын

Same

I thought it was gonna be what was the click-rate between children compared to adults along with an overall clickrate, but the lesson on rounding numbers like this should be more visible to the word like bfdi

There are 3 billion bots watching Baby Shark.

@ChickenCluckGD

16 күн бұрын

I wonder how they feel

I thought this video would go into some sort of limitation regarding for example floating point number precision. Even though it makes no sense to save views as floating point numbers. 10B is bigger than 2^32 (about 4.3B) but if you use 32 Bit integers you either have an overflow, or the views stay at a maximum of 4.3B. Anyways nice video.

I love how Cary is someone who 100% knows how to inspect element and make the numbers in the view count change, and yet his style is to write over the view count in handwriting. Commitment.

really wish some of these platforms had an "i'm not afraid of big numbers" mode

@xdn22

Жыл бұрын

YES

how to explain logarithms without saying the word "logarithm":

@QuantumScratcher

Жыл бұрын

opposite of power so log_2(65536)=16

My personal theory is that teachers keep making kindergarteners watch baby shark😂

Because some of the comments also pointed out that localization also have some importance, I would like to know if there's any Indian here can explain this matter in relevance of their interesting digit groupings like lakh, crore, and beyond.

Thank you for telling me tetrations are a thing. I looked it up after this and learned about Hyperoperations which were a thing I had thought about many times but only now learned actually has a name and a mathematical formula to go with it! I am stupidly ecstatic about this in a way only a math nerd could be.

@mullafacation

Жыл бұрын

I like coming up with functions (hence "mullafacation") and I figured that it would be useless to have operations like tetrations because they would get too big. I am interested though in whether there's a name on a factorial-like operation that adds or subtracts rather than multiplies but maybe that is truly useless...

@Anonymous-df8it

Жыл бұрын

@@mullafacation Yes! The triangular numbers.

Ngl, the animated character made this video a listening experience

Finally, a video focusing on KZread view statistics. This is what I have been waiting for, thank you Carykh.

Very fascinating 😳 I never thought numbers would be this interesting

I miss when it was gangnam style

The full view count is sometimes covered by the like count because of the new "download" and "clip" options making that info bar wider, as well as the word "dislike" instead of the dislike count. I literally need to zoom out to view this video's full view count

Such simple concept from a average video seeming got so popular with is simple but mesmerised pattern that lures people giving it so much power

5:35 triggered my regex ptsd

@Maazin5

Жыл бұрын

\d{3}[KMB]

1:49 did anyone see the bfdi 1a over there

@PotatoBeatboxer

7 ай бұрын

Yea me

i watched this without even realizing it was for SoME2, nice work

baby shark needs 1/8 of despacito's full viewcount to register a single change. I feel like this view of it really highlights the power of this sort of breakpoint in formulas.

You literally are amazing- like imagine another KZreadr that explains math are basically so boring to watch, but you make it interesting and entertaining ! You are doing animation, entertaining math and more! You are really awesome! Plus you created the first ever object show in the world! You were doing animation (with your brother) when you were a kid! That is awesome! I don’t know if you realize how you are amazing- Continue like that! Bye !

Update from about a day after this video was posted: Baby Shark officially has over 11B views now! Also, haven't seen anyone mention the thumbnail art, but I like the hand-drawn style.

@EverythingTheorist

Жыл бұрын

Update from about 6 months after this video was posted: Baby Shark is at about 12.2 billion views now. Dear gosh.

This is how you turn something seemingly uninteresting and invisible into very interesting, noticeable and entertaining.

This is why I am subscribed to the CaryKH KZread channel, I get to watch epic spreadsheet content about funny shark song. 👍

Added nuance: for the first views after passing each power, there seems to be only one sig fig. For instance, 1000-1099 views is always just 1K instead of 1.0K views

@Pystro

Жыл бұрын

Also seems to happen to 7.0k displaying as "7k". I think the ".0" is just always dropped. At least it was for the viewer count of a stream. That was the first entry in the recommendation list with singles as the most significant digit that should have a ".0". And I only took 1 sample because I had to scroll through pages and pages of thumbnails to find it.

Very nice observation on how 2.72k literally takes more characters than 2725, just a baffling choice by youtube

Nice! A month before this video was launched, I actually studied this youtube's view truncating system and implemented it in my Python project. Basically my project was about getting youtube search results. It's really interesting to see a video on it!

So glad you're allowed to post these random data vids! And please do more, as you can tell by the mysterious lack of decimal point, we do watch these videos! So keep them coming, because (in my opinion) posting regular low-quality vids is much better than posting very irregularily! (also I just realised no decimal point could mean you have anything less than 1,100 views, I'm sorry)

9:27 Actually, they would provide more information with the exact same character count, because they actually use commas in numbers.

This was so interesting!! I'd absolutely watch more shower-thought-y videos of yours

Love this video! Ty for sharing :)

I thought the title said "the man behind baby shark's viewcount" and I was expecting the story of some guy watching it on repeat religiously

After 3 days it’s now 11B :0

1:18 hearing carykh say this felt surreal

Whenever I watch these videos and I don’t understand *anything* , but he explains stuff so we’ll that I actually get what he’s talking about! Props to you, Cary.

I have always wanted to know what a power tower is called and now I know it’s called a tetration!

Now is 11 billion

The video you showed with 8 views is gonna become the most viewed video after this lol

I like how he uses bfdi and bfb backgrounds behind his animated send when he has nothing to show on screen

Surprisingly interesting! Long time viewer would love more :)

There are videos which are much more deserving of 10B views than baby shark

I have watched baby shark 0 times and plan to keep it that way

@TunaBear64

Жыл бұрын

Same, but I love to see big numbers and that almost 11 Billion is really tempting to see.

@gringusgaming

8 ай бұрын

​@@TunaBear64hmmm... true

The Keaton ellis subtle twitch plug caught me very off guard

Cary's channel is slowly becoming Film Theory but educational

3:29 Cary: *tries to make an Australian slang-like word* Cary: sIgFiGs

@mous3kteer

Жыл бұрын

?? but "sigfigs" is a super common shortening of "significant figures"? I'm not when the last time was that I _didn't_ shorten it to sigfigs when talking.

@ItzzAlooOfficial

6 ай бұрын

Hey another Pakistani

something about the fact that the most viewed video on youtube is one of these popular baby videos that babies watch a kajillion times every day so they get inflated view counts. just kind of makes me upset

@kirtil5177

Жыл бұрын

i wonder how different all these stats would be if views were unique per account, like likes are, so once you view you cant view twice or more

@the4spaceconstantstetraqua886

Жыл бұрын

@@kirtil5177 There is an actual statistic only accessible to the content creator which is the number of unique veiws.

@the4spaceconstantstetraqua886

Жыл бұрын

Same, just that I don't like insanely high stats of any type on kids videos/channels. Views, you know why, but subscribers? WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN!?

Decent analysis video! Thanks for uploading!

2:51 a view is a view, you cant say its only a half

baby Shark hit 11B views already.

It's kinda sad that none of the 10 most popular videos are real, user created videos.

@Anonymous-df8it

Жыл бұрын

wdym?

7 minutes! Glad you uploaded!

I couldn't stop watching baby shark.

this video is rich in random cool info lol

finally someone did the math

Well made video Cary!

"There's no such thing as a fractional view" Also Cary, 3 minutes earlier: "The average human out of all of them has watched Baby Shark 1.38 times" (I know this is an average number, not actual statistical data towards KZread or the point of the video)

0:57 That is some excellent comedic timing.

As of yet, it's somehow now 13Billion+.

Another carykh video! Can’t wait to see the next one ;)

Many thanks, information was certainly important.

How this can happen: repeat watchings and probably watching the video on half speed. the video is also highly linked throughout the net and collects automated views by surf-bys

@miguelangelmartinezcasado8935

Жыл бұрын

Half speed only affects retention time, not amount of views. I know it cause you can test it in small videos. It only counts as 1

@prunabluepepper

Жыл бұрын

@@miguelangelmartinezcasado8935 I believe the Spiffing Brit found out otherwise. I think it's that watch through time gives you one count of view for each time you watch the video until the threshold is met for the count. This threshold is actually met already before 100% watchtime is reached. This is why skipping forward in a video still counts as having seen it fully. Same goes for starting to watch it, then pausing it, leaving the side on, while the time measured by the cookie keeps ticking. View-time, or watch-through-time is calculated 1 per whole video ( resp. threshold met). If you watch on half speed while the video content is accelerated you feel like you watch it on 1x speed, however, the AI calculates 2 seconds of watch time for every 1 second that passed in reality. The threshold is thus met twice within the span of the same video. Thus it get's two views.

in Spanish YT the numbers are usually more precise, there is no K for thousand, and we use long numbers, i.e. 1 billion is 1000 million, 1 thousand is 1000, etc. so if you search for Despacito it gives you 7918 million instead of 7.9 B. also we use points for thousands and commas for decimals

I love the way that you animate your avatar, for it is very engaging.

I’m kind of confused though how can baby shark get 10B views if not that people exist in the world

@Mobin92

Жыл бұрын

You can watch things multiple times?

0:27 “69 69” had me dying

@lauluis1mii124

Жыл бұрын

?

@trihgtwo.Se2

10 ай бұрын

?

@TheWorldsLargestOven

7 ай бұрын

?

I love how you drew the baby shark and mother shark

this is why I'm subscribed to you

0:38 Wait till he hears about arrow notation

@fantiscious

Жыл бұрын

And G64

@WTIF2024

Жыл бұрын

@@fantiscious And TREE(3)

@SuperWindows78

Жыл бұрын

@@WTIF2024 And Rayo(10^100)

@WTIF2024

Жыл бұрын

@@SuperWindows78 no you fish

@SuperWindows78

Жыл бұрын

@@WTIF2024 And FOOT^10(10^100)