I'd love to see a clickable version of this image with links to the relevant videos.

@ekt2656

3 жыл бұрын

Kinda sounds like hyperphysics

@kevin_delaney

3 жыл бұрын

@@ekt2656 Nowhere NEAR as pretty and aesthetically pleasing. Humans take in far more data through our eyes than people realize. We are visual learners. It's faster and easier to be shown than to read it ourselves.

@0042090

3 жыл бұрын

Great idea

@Osalo

3 жыл бұрын

There's something like that, in a Spanish channel called Quantum Fracture, he has like a virtual poster with (Idk if qr but) codes to his videos and stuff

@MrofficialC

3 жыл бұрын

ThaT would be awesome

Ive been so interested in quantum physics, so i got a phd in it. Such am amazing statement not that many people can say, especially as casual as he did.

@3am585

3 жыл бұрын

lets chat

@linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10

3 жыл бұрын

I almost got it... I was so interested in how the world works, so I got 2 masters. One in physics and the other one in theoretical physics and I also completed the course work for the physics phd program. Unfortunately I wasn't interested enough/motivated enough to complete the dissertation... I kinda got stuck with the research. I was not interested in the things I could have done to get the phd. It is way to hard for me to do the research for money. So I am working as a software developer now, that's effing EASY after physics and pays much better. Once I have enough money and buy everything I need I might return into physics and research the things not someone else, but I AM interested about.

@halicusnguyen8864

3 жыл бұрын

@@linuxgaminginfullhd60fps10 :D nice! It's really inspiring to see people pursue what they desire in order to fuel their interests, instead of pursuing what other people desire for them to have an interest in.

@prakharchaurasia8359

3 жыл бұрын

bro how to get phd in multiple fields please answer

@gaiusbiju6067

2 жыл бұрын

@@prakharchaurasia8359 it's possible

I have a phd in math and I don't know much about quantum physics, but I recognized and 'understood' most of the tokens in the map. Surely, each expert will have their criticism about the map (maybe because it's too cursory about their own subdiscipline), but I found it very well done! Especially the fact that it's topology kind of actually makes sense, in terms of how the various "regions" touch each other.

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

The Learning never ends, so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general to them! Mind if i do?

@uzumakisasuke5026

2 жыл бұрын

@@nenmaster5218 there are many channels like crash course ,sci show ,its okay to be smart and veratsium explains some

@anonymooseuser2150

Жыл бұрын

What job opportunities have you undertaken with your PHD?

@redoyanarifin4661

Жыл бұрын

Can a mathematician become astrophysicist?

As biologist, i love It

@shilohrose2056

3 жыл бұрын

Ahhh that’s so exciting! We need more funding for stuff like this.

@halicusnguyen8864

3 жыл бұрын

@@shilohrose2056 :D and minds as well! I feel like exposing young children to concepts such as quantum mechanics, physics, chemistry, philosophy, and so on would broaden their perspective on the subject so much more! Talent is simply pursued interests, and giving kids a larger pool to be fascinated by and look into for themselves would be so much more instead of throwing it all at them when they're older and the time has come to make large decisions. And this is coming from a kid.

@floatytrouty

3 жыл бұрын

Me:Why did we study this School:Idk but here is your 5 pages of Homwork

@ThomasJr

2 жыл бұрын

*Quantum computing will turn men into gods, when it's fully achieved. I have no idea how complex it is, but they say at 1000Qubits, you have processing power that a conventional computer could not run in the lifetime of the Universe. And knowing how brute force is such a tremendous power, there are many theoretical problems that could be solved just by testing out all of the possible combinations. Lol*

@debadityasaha1684

2 жыл бұрын

@@ThomasJr i have to agree with you, quantum computing is so advanced it lierally seems like the next step for the evolution of civilization.

Thats the subject for which i was waiting forever.. Now its hereee!

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure. .. where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.

If only schools embraced Domain of Science, Kurzgesagt and Brilliant... (and others such as minute earth, tier zoo, ted ed, et.c.)

@aakarshan4644

3 жыл бұрын

Vsauce and Veritasium too

@hafsazarreen

3 жыл бұрын

@@Frosty-tr3ow actually🙂

@monster_in_the_dark

3 жыл бұрын

And Arwin Ash channel also

@peeyushsharma8408

3 жыл бұрын

And the most important one: Science Asylum.

@papalouis9111

3 жыл бұрын

Er vi fucking enige?!

I just love this man and his channel, the way he is teaching. I need him to talk about GEB.

@augustuscaeser1358

3 жыл бұрын

Now that can get one crazy... Even the good ones

@bparlan

3 жыл бұрын

@@augustuscaeser1358 Isn't it? That would be his true step from science into philosophy, with one of the best resource of all times.

@CmdrShepard1001

3 жыл бұрын

Godel, Escher, Bach?

@bparlan

3 жыл бұрын

@@CmdrShepard1001 Yes!

@CmdrShepard1001

3 жыл бұрын

​@@bparlan Just finished it a few weeks ago. Damn that book is thick but great!

Fabulous Edit :- next map - astronomy and astrophysics

@-w-.

3 жыл бұрын

Astrology ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@2002rashdy

3 жыл бұрын

Muchi Doopalot NO

@valeska1632

3 жыл бұрын

YES

@themarvellouschannel3032

3 жыл бұрын

Yes

@themarvellouschannel3032

3 жыл бұрын

@@-w-. *N* *O*

Drinking game: take a shot for every time he says "quantum".

@domainofscience

3 жыл бұрын

Even just a shot of milk would be a challenge.

@timppaUT

3 жыл бұрын

According to this video, that activity is impossible to perform, as you either know where you beer bottle is, but not its momentum. Or you know your beer bottle momentum towards your mouth, but cant anyhow know where your mouth is! :P And that phenomenon have actually happened to me even before watching this video, as alcohol particles on a beer created space-time vortex around my head creating distorted local universe so it was really hard to figure out where my drinking organs were! :/

@BlakeTedKord

3 жыл бұрын

@@domainofscience how far are we from teleportation tech? Or conscious transference before death, or cloning?

@hippiesmokes

3 жыл бұрын

Take a drink every time he’s irrational. Careful, I tried it and I’m really drunk!

@fundamentalsofknowledge6902

3 жыл бұрын

@@BlakeTedKord I suppose around a century or two, given the pace of the advancements. However, NASA said we would reach Mars by 2000s and people said we would have flying cars by now and the whole world would go airborne so... I mean I am writing this while sitting on the sofa in a NOT flying apartment...

You're a legend, Dominic! Thank you so much for all these 'maps', they have been amazingly helpful in getting to know all these academic disciplines. And QM doubly so, it's really complicated.

This map doesn't include Quantum Physics used to fix game stories

@lightbringrr1232

3 жыл бұрын

Also the quantum physics in movies

@kugelblitzingularity304

3 жыл бұрын

Ah yes, and a moebius strip

@handhdhd6522

3 жыл бұрын

Kugelblitzingularity and eigenvector and eigenvalues

@bayleev7494

3 жыл бұрын

eh just draw a pencil in a piece of paper, that should cover it

@Ben-fy3dl

3 жыл бұрын

Also movies like Endgame

20 minutes ago I was sure that my master's and career would be dedicated to geophysics (paleomagnetism, specifically), now I feel I'm back to where I began: Particle Physics. Oh boy, I feel like I'm cheating and want to get back to a toxic relationship.

@prateekgupta2408

3 жыл бұрын

Do whatever you love

@Drachensslay

3 жыл бұрын

Why not both?

@prateekgupta2408

3 жыл бұрын

@@Drachensslay yeah he can

@lesley1831

3 жыл бұрын

@@Drachensslay Because of time. I've read that when it comes to research and real progress in a field, you should specialised in one branch. And both of them, are fields in which even the place of work are set in different type of areas or spaces. Luckily I've still have time to decide, but I've thought that up until this video I had already made up my mind. Has this ever happened to you? Any advice? Thank you for commenting!🎁 Kind regards Cameron!⚛

@lesley1831

3 жыл бұрын

@@prateekgupta2408 The same thing I was told by my parents! Wisest advice ever! Thank you Prateek and for your nice, encouraging comment!🎉 Hope you have a lovely weekend🌻

Excellent presentation! I am a neurologist with only Grade 12 level formal education in Physics. All the "popular science" videos that I had watched prior to yours tend to describe Quantum Mechanics in a sensational way and ultimately talk about how General Relativity fails at the quantum level. This was a great presentation because it covered so many practical applications of the various subfields of Quantum Mechanics and the stress appears to be on explaining the topics in an easy way rather than sensationalizing. Kudos to you!

Edit: The poster sales one DFTBA are working again. There was something wrong but it is all fixed now. Thanks for your patience and thanks so much for all the amazing feedback, you are all so nice! I'm having a week off right now, but will be back into video making after that, got lots of exciting ideas I can't wait to get my teeth into!😄

@smitapandey5562

3 жыл бұрын

Hello sir Sir it's a humble request Could you make videos on trigonometry and also trigonometric parallax

@luisgeniole369

3 жыл бұрын

Mate, I think you forgot the flickr upload: www.flickr.com/photos/95869671@N08/ Love your videos btw

@victorvalencia6466

3 жыл бұрын

Please!!!! Can you answer me this? You know when a measurement happens on an entangled particle a collapse of the entire system occurs, instantly, even if the other entangled particle is on the other side of the universe. Supposedly violating relativity and the concept that nothing moves faster than light, not even information. But that is not what bothers me. The key word here is "Instantly". What does it mean? Because in relativity there is a concept of simultaneity, which literally states that the same exact thing will not happen at the same exact time depending on the speed of the observers. So if i had an entangled particle and my partner had the other one and i stayed still on earth and he went to space and moved at a speed and in a direction such that my future becomes now his present, (meanwhile my present is still his present) then i make a measurement. What is that happens at that moment? Did my particle in his past just affected his particle in his present? From his reference frame that could have not been instant, because my measurement happened in his past. What is that is happenning "instantly"at that moment when i made that measurement then? What is that happens at that moment in both our reference frames? If we cant agree that an event happened at the same time due to relativistic effects (the event being me doing the measurment) how can we agree that a collapse of the entangled system happened instantly? In what reference frame? The ether's reference frame? If we did the experiment the other way around, could the future particle affect the present one? Instantly? How could that be "instantly" thou? Maybe i dont understand these concepts of "instantly" and "simultaneity". Please i want to understand.

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter {\displaystyle m}m is Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.

@Zehn2222

3 жыл бұрын

@@josephlau13d77 +1

Tremendous video. I'm trying to self-study the realm of quantum theory(ies) as a hobby and couldn't see the forest for the trees. This map cleared up how the various topics are connected, giving me a mental organizer. Thank you!

Great video! You touched on a lot of concepts rarely talked about on KZread. The lack of knowledge around high Tc superconductors and the mention of topological phase transition were awesome to see included. Only one I was hoping to see but didn't was topological superconductivity and our ideas in applying it quantum computing. I personally think it's our best shot at getting around that pesky decoherence, but hey I might be a little biased. You're 100% correct though around condensed matter being freaking endless. Awesome video I look forward to the next!

Nice! The green-screen bit looks great! :)

@domainofscience

3 жыл бұрын

All thanks to you dude! Yeah it worked great 😄

@nahulseyon54

3 жыл бұрын

@@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology. By, Your top fan 😄😊😁😃☺🙂🤗😇😶🙄😏😀......

@b4byf4c3455451n

3 жыл бұрын

@@domainofscience hallo to you. I have the M-theory: The comprehension is the only wish about this powerfull reality. And this omnipotent reality use the free will to soddisfy the only desire he gets. Maybe the big bang is still happening in the Planck's length. Perhaps the big bang is really the greatest explosion there is but this only in the world of ideas. In the real world it is the smallest of the explosions

@jessevollmar2689

3 жыл бұрын

@@domainofscience narrative genius of Domain of Science 🧬🧫 🧪 your great learning for my fringy 🧠 brain 🧠 from my cabin fever I am very very much grateful to be a video viewer of Domain of Science

@muneebrajaraja1030

2 жыл бұрын

@@nahulseyon54 000 ,

Not many people realize how instructive and useful this video actually is 👏👏👌👌

THANK YOU FROM 2022! Very comprehensive and made me happy to recognize a lot more than I expected before watching lol I choose Quantum studies as a lifetime hobby, and this did NOT disappoint my fascination with the entire realm of studies!

Thank you so much for this initiative of yours, I hope all your videos get used more widely to show students the map of everything!

Nice breakdown of the subjects. I'm finishing up a PhD in magnetic resonance and early on it was challenging to keep all of these ideas straight. Looking forward to checking out more of your videos.

It's such as a beautiful map. Thank you for your contribution to science

Thank you! I've been looking for this kind of informational video for so long!

Finally a new one! I love these types of videos!

This is an absolutely fantastic video. Thanks for doing what you do! :)

Brilliant! Teachers keep teaching from lessons to lessons but never explain how they are related together. This is exactly what every student needs. Do you have a map like this for other fields of physics??

@lugyd1xdone195

Жыл бұрын

He made one of Particle Physics.

Your explanations are definitely among the best, clearest and most concise. Thanks for creating this content :)

great job! this kind of overview is fundamental for understanding some specif concepts trough the logical conections betwen them! thanks for that!

YESSSS I LOVE THIS CHANNEL SO MUCH THANK YOUUU, love from México 💓💓

the music starting at 15:11 is crazy cool !!!

Thank you so much for your youtube playlist! That's very helpful!

WOOOW Thank you so much for compiling this, very helpful keep it up!

Videos like this make me want to go back for a PhD 3 years after I've finished my Master's...

@vishnurahul3378

3 жыл бұрын

Why dont you go for your PhD then

@Zen_Power

3 жыл бұрын

What subject did you study your masters?

@and_I_am_Life_the_fixer_of_all

3 жыл бұрын

Be sure to go into it with a emotionally strong as it a PhD is much harder than a Masters, but you can do it! Go for it!

Actually, @3:00, the reason why every particle exhibits wave-like behavior is because as you said much later in the video (almost at the end), there aren't any particles in our description of reality, only fields, described by quantum field theory. Particles aren't actually particles, with particle properties like position or momentum, but quantas, with quantum properties like countablility or spin. In fact, the wave-function is a terrible name for the state of a quantum system as it suggests it is some kind of wave, or disturbance in some field. But the wave function is not a genuine wave nor is it a field! Indeed, in non relativistic quantum particle mechanics, this wave function would depend on N*D position-like parameters (in the position basis), N being the number of particles one is describing and D being the spatial dimension (usually 3) of the system of interest. However, a true field (and wave) would only depend on D position-like parameters. Also @4:18, the Dirac equation, although introduced historically as the relativistic version of the Schrödinger equation, is actually not the relativistic equivalent of the Schrödinger equation. In fact, from a pure conceptual point of view, the two equations have nothing to do with one an other. The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. It's just that the hamiltionian H is not p^2/(2*m)+V but rather some functional of relativistic fields such as {integral over all space of e0*E^2/2+B^2/(2*m0)} for the free electromagnetic field. On the other end, the Dirac equation is actually the simplest equation that a relativistic spin 1/2 genuine field could be described by, making the Dirac field, an actual classical field as any other classical fields. It just so happens that taking the non relativistic limit of the genuine field equation that is the Dirac equation, one gets an equation that very much ressembles the Schrödinger equation. It is only by quantizing this Dirac field (which is not actually a second quantization but the only, hence first and last, quantization) that one gets quantum properties for this Dirac field in the end.

@anncf6405

3 жыл бұрын

Wow!!!! You sure know a lot about Quantum Mechanics

@ankitminz5872

3 жыл бұрын

@@anncf6405 Me trying to understand: Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

@anncf6405

3 жыл бұрын

Ankit Minz saaaammmee

@anncf6405

3 жыл бұрын

Athena Jennings I understand most of it and the general idea of most concepts. Truth is is that we still know almost nothing about the really small. It truly is “spooky action at a distance.”- Einstein

@MultiCoolman125

3 жыл бұрын

"The Schrödinger equation is all about quantum mechanics and is actually still valid in special relativistic quantum mechanics. " This is false. If you act the Lorentz transform on the both sides, you will find it's not Lorentz invariant, hence clearly not relativistic.

Very cool explanation, I love all your maps. Thank you dude!!

Thank you so much bro. I've been wanting to understand a little bit about Quantum Physics for a while now, but never knew where to start! So seriously, this video is so helpful.

Thumps up professor fantastic. I'm going to try to add Kurdish caption for it. 👏👏👏👏

Me: Oh boy, let's watch this! Also me when he says Northwest: Wait, where's that?

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is.. Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. . The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure.

This makes me miss our physics teacher Dr Udy.....he always went off curriculum & talked to us bout things like black holes & quarks......most interesting fun teacher ever.....RIP

Thank you for sharing! I'm looking for all I can to wrap my mind around this! So many PhD College professors can't share what they know because they don't know how to share knowledge. You are doing a great job! I'm a retired Mechanical Engineer and am just trying to use all this time I have now to exercise my mind. Thank You!

This was an amazing video!

People talk about how weird the double slit experiment is or Bell's theorem, but for my money the weirdest aspect is the discrete form energy quantization takes. Emergent discreteness, as it appears in reality is way weirder than people give credit. 'discrete energy states results from their wave functions only vibrating in specific ways' is abstracting a whole lot of complexity in reality that goes well beyond the simple mathematics we use to describe and model the result we refer to as energy quantization.

@nrrgrdn

3 жыл бұрын

Discrete energy levels just come from periodic boundary conditions for atomic orbitals.

@georganatoly6646

3 жыл бұрын

@@nrrgrdn Right, my point is - that explanation encapsulates and abstracts away an enormous amount of 'weirdness' and complexity that must exist embedded within reality for that emergent discreteness to be observed. Instead of using that high-level explanation start peeling back the layers of abstraction and you'll quickly find our well tested mathematical and scientifically based models give way to nothing more than unscientific and unfalsifiable 'interpretations'. It's similar to how people take for granted, or at least express a level of comfort, with the idea that anti-matter and matter annihilate when they come in contact. That word, annihilate, or 'cancels out' encapsulates incredible complexity that requires doodles in the way of Feynman diagrams just so we can begin to describe it mathematically, let alone describe with scientific certainty any deeper understanding.

@nrrgrdn

3 жыл бұрын

@@georganatoly6646 periodic boundary conditions can actually be explained and visualized without math. See for example kzread.info/dash/bejne/oYCYj5iOqdfRebg.html from 3:30

I love Quantum physics and didn't know what all it contains. With this map, I can go through everything clearly! Thank you.

Awesome video , this helps bring so much context to everything thrown at us in a classroom, love it

Quantum physics has fascinated me for years, I have been learning about it casually for a couple years and am seriously considering dedicating the better part of my life (I'm 27 now) just immersing myself completely and really tunneling in on something very specific, the driving motivation for watching this video beyond just general curiosity of quantum physics. I am a tech geek so my focus in quantum physics has largely been on most of your quantum technology examples other than squids and atomic clocks, such as new computer storage devices, understanding read and write errors in computer memory which could be crippling data loss due to the corruption of vital data, solid state electronics and lasers, even briefly investigating quantum computing (however, it's very clear that area is quite very young), et cetera, et cetera. There is a potential scientific advancement that I'm seriously considering dedicating my life and all my available current and future resources (or at least most of them) towards solving and perfecting and democratizing to advance the human species in a way only few (in my personal experience) can imagine, let alone willing to put legitimate time and effort into further investigation, God forbid the thought of investing money is mentioned. 😂 I am sure you get this all the time, do you have a discord channel or a way to just talk? I'd love to get your opinion on a couple things that potentially work harmoniously inside a larger system, which, if true, would just be a game changer. I've struggled finding an intellectual to discuss this with, that can allow themselves to turn off the part of the brain that says "No, that's impossible. Don't waste your time." And I know from past conversations how open-minded quantum physics really kind of requires one to think. So I'm curious to see what you'd have to say, privately, on the subject. I'm not particularly interested in commercializing it, I'm more interested in the applied technology which would be akin to a step change in human evolution. Just curious to pick your brain a bit if you'd be willing to. Ima buy this poster, I wonder if I could have it printed on metal like Displate 🤔

Love the music in the background

Your videos are amazing! I can't stop watching them! Really enjoyable. Thanks a loooot!

The lad's done it once again.

I barely survived 2 semesters during undergrad and he gets a Phd on it. Thanks! Lol

Thanks for making these videos. You deserve a lot more recognition and subscribers!

I just really want to thank you for making these videos. Your work I believe is brilliant.

I would love to meet with a wise person like you who knows and tells physics that well! I want to be quantum physicist one day

Great new map! I had the impression you completely forgot magnetism. Especially so since magnets are better known by non-physicists/chemists than some of the other applied technologies you mentioned.

@nenmaster5218

2 жыл бұрын

The Learning never ends, so call it silly, but i do have the hobby of asking people if i an recommend them Science-chanenl or just Education-channel in general to them! Mind if i do?

THAT WAS SOMETHING I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR ALL MY LIFE! really, I found your channel because of quantum physics, and THIS video is just what I need in my life now.

I just happened upon this video. While I've seen and read about just about everything presented, I'd never seen it all put together in as accessible a way as has been done here. Thanks. I look forward to viewing your other videos.

i like the representation of the standard model

@wirsindhelden0

3 жыл бұрын

I thought the same thing! This one visually made more sense to me than most I've seen. It does a really good job of taking the asymmetry in the current known model and configuring it in a visually symmetric pattern.

@fuseteam

3 жыл бұрын

@@wirsindhelden0 yes that makes it nice to look at and remember too

Next map: The Map of Geometry

@theguythatmakesyoumad3834

3 жыл бұрын

*I would suggest Geography or Economics actually*

@fgvcosmic6752

3 жыл бұрын

@@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 a map of geography is just earth

@stepback7143

3 жыл бұрын

@@theguythatmakesyoumad3834 Economics would be interesting!

@jorgepeterbarton

3 жыл бұрын

@@fgvcosmic6752 map of cartology

This video is so useful for a recap even to people who already know all this! Helps to remember where everything fits in the grand scheme of things.

I love your videos. I watched a satisfying video which increases my knowledge after a great interval of months. I have studied or say brushed through a lot of these concepts during my school, engineering or other youtube videos but the connection that you have established is simply awesome. I more thing, I think the humble motor we use in our daily life to run a lot of things has a lot to do with quantum mechanics than we think, I guess we have simply not researched enough.

Cool map, would be even better without the quantum biology bit 😂😂

SWEET! Was waiting for this!! Personal request: Please make a video on the history of Medicine and Surgery

Everything about Quantum Physics fascinates me because it answers or it may answer all the question I have(in future) about working of everything.

I've read a few books about quantum theory, and I've watched several documentaries about it over the past 25 years. This is an excellent summary of the topic. Thanks.

When watching your video, I noticed that some of the background music is a bit too loud, so it becomes hard to distinguish your speak from the background music. The synth music works ok with playback at 2x. Otherwise awesome.

@domainofscience

3 жыл бұрын

Hey thanks for the feedback, I'll tone it down a bit in the future. I find audio mixing quite challenging to be honest. Cheers!

@nahulseyon54

3 жыл бұрын

@@domainofscience plz upload more videos about nanites and nanotechnology. By, Your top fan 😁😄😀😃😊☺🙂🤗😇😶😏🙄......

why the f this guy doesn't have subs in millions

@williampatrickfurey

13 сағат бұрын

How many did he have?

A-MA-ZING Congratulations, this is the most intuitive and comprehensive lesson I've seen on QF. It helped so much to get an idea of many different things and theories I read about QF and didnt understand their meaning or the connection between them

I recently found your channel and liked the way you present the maps of these subjects the with such clarity and information.please continue. I love your animation they are awesome. Just one suggestion you can also discuss thr timeline of any specific area in chronological order.

After listening to all this ... "Why still I am a normal human?"

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

Gravitational waves in linearized gravity can be described as manifestly observable Riemann curvature tensors from Einstein's field equations. The Ricci tensor will vanish while the Riemann tensor can be nonzero as well. The components of the affine connection (Christoffel coefficients) can be given by partial differentiation. The usual notion of 'gravitational force' disappears in general relativity, replaced instead by the idea that freely falling bodies follow geodesics in spacetime. Given a spacetime metric gab and a set of spacetime coordinates xa, geodesic trajectories are given by the equation as where τ is a proper time as measured by an observer travelling along the geodesic. Dirac equation is relativistic and proves the existence of antimatter. The Klein-Gordon equation with mass parameter is... Perturbation theories and quantum fluctuations. Solutions of the equation are complex-valued functions; the Laplacian acts on the space variables only. The equation is often abbreviated as where μ = mc/ħ, and □ is the d'Alembert operator. The Dirac equation relativistic spectrum is, however, easily recovered if the orbital-momentum quantum number l is replaced by total angular-momentum quantum number j. In January 1926, Schrödinger submitted for publication instead his equation, a non-relativistic approximation that predicts the Bohr energy levels of hydrogen without fine structure. .. where gαβ is the inverse of the metric tensor that is the gravitational potential field, g is the determinant of the metric tensor, ∇μ is the covariant derivative, and Γσμν is the Christoffel symbol that is the gravitational force field.

@divyamshukla

3 жыл бұрын

@@josephlau13d77 ??..

@_yawol_

3 жыл бұрын

That is alright

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

@@zeapic8500 I suggest purchasing certain textbooks on general relativity and linear algebra with touches on matrix mechanics. A PhD level book would suffice, or even graduate-level ones. A rigorous course on QM and GR is important to be proficient in theoretical physics. EFEs are especially important as they provide lots of insight into physics. And, sure, talk Chinese, I know the language as well proficiently. Fire away.

"Quantum physics research": quantum biology and quantum chemistry... Yup, looks like a superposition to me.

Yesss! Been waiting for this since you previewed it on twitter a while ago.

i really love the many worlds interpretation and its implications. I after i finish school I want to study something in quantum physics, especially in the direction of nuclear and particle physics. This really gave me a great overview of what there is in quantum physics

did it take long to make? cause quantum physics is pretty complex

Can you make classical physics map please please 🙏🙏🙏🙏

@stepback7143

3 жыл бұрын

there is one

Excellent video sir! Absolutely loved it! Nicely done.

Fantastic video! I feel like kid in candy shop. Most of the concepts are superficially familiar but this is the first time for a complete navigational map! Wonderful. My TOP3 favourites: 1) Double-slit experiment with electrons shot one at a time, 2) Quantum Entanglement and spooky effect at a distance, and 3) Casimir Effect and learnings in the old french navy.

Man, I havent been this confused since my sophomore algebra 2 class

13:28 - Wasn't the quantum thing about photosynthesis controversial? (Or maybe it's not anymore in 2020? IDK...)

Loved this. First rate graphics, too. Well done.

Amazing job! Really appreciate such hard work!

He is so good looking and I love his accent. 😍

Am I the only 14 year old who is learning quantum physics?

@hoogikimaru4026

2 ай бұрын

No you are not

@shivangkashyapbaruah1735

2 ай бұрын

14 yr olds together. Strong

@hoogikimaru4026

2 ай бұрын

@@shivangkashyapbaruah1735 yes

@Shauryakumar844

2 ай бұрын

Me too

@nitroglycerin6633

2 ай бұрын

Nah

You are great, man🙌🏼 thanks for this

Great work! I love your maps.

I appreciate your efforts for making this video possible, thanks for making 😍

Definitely, i subscribed you i am seeing you for first time. Your explanation is awesome.

Wow, I had known about quantum mechanics and was interested in it, but this information definitely spiked my interest enough to turn it into more of a long term desire to understand it. Thank you for the video!

This my 7month learning about vortex math 🔸 it's so complex with universe's law math is always infitiny it easy and difficult at times but the more I study the more I learn how to read math it's part of the ecosystem also

i am so thankful for this videos. i would take me a lot of times to discover all of these domain of quantum physics by myself

Amazing video as usual! You videos are the best!

Your maps are so very good, thank you!

Great presentation on quantum physics explained beautifully

I love your vidoes about your maps. Well done.

Thank you is the only things I could say right now. Definitely love the way of you simplify this

@josephlau13d77

3 жыл бұрын

A maximally symmetric Lorentzian manifold is a spacetime in which no point in space and time can be distinguished in any way from another, and (being Lorentzian) the only way in which a direction (or tangent to a path at a spacetime point) can be distinguished is whether it is spacelike, lightlike or timelike. The space of special relativity (Minkowski space) is an example. A constant scalar curvature means a general relativity gravity-like bending of spacetime that has a curvature described by a single number that is the same everywhere in spacetime in the absence of matter or energy. Negative curvature means curved hyperbolically, like a saddle surface or the Gabriel's Horn surface, similar to that of a trumpet bell. It might be described as being the "opposite" of the surface of a sphere, which has a positive curvature.

Really cool and satisfying explanation.Thank you

Love your work man... thank you!

Excellent presentation. One of the best, I have listened too.

Wow, this is astoundingly good. I did study physics but am learning new things from this chart.

I've been waiting for this video for a long time ✨

Superb overview thank you.

I love this map guys. Subscribed!