“Someone proved Einstein wrong” *when the two smartest kids in the class have different answers*

@bloodlust_9890

4 жыл бұрын

Like me and my friend braulio Were in 4th grade and we solved 10!

@zakskingdomm

4 жыл бұрын

BloodBath YT1 cool we have got an r/youngpeopleyoutube say something funny plz

@rufodeer5421

4 жыл бұрын

@@zakskingdomm a*

@okejan3646

4 жыл бұрын

@@zakskingdomm like me do 100x100 and we diffrent answer we 10000000000000

@invizible8426

4 жыл бұрын

I’m like the smartest kid in my class

"What biases do you have?" I don't have any biases, at all. I am completely unbiased, and everyone who says otherwise must therefore be wrong.

@mantisshrimp9637

4 жыл бұрын

I love this man

@AyanKhan-if3mm

4 жыл бұрын

Really?

@sarah12232

4 жыл бұрын

Lol

@kuratse205

4 жыл бұрын

What? You are wrong! You have biases unlike me, a saintlike human! How DARE YOU SAY I AM WRONG. s/

@kunalkashelani585

4 жыл бұрын

@@kuratse205 saints are the biggest a-holes you will find!!

At least Einstein admitted his mistake. Like a true scientist would.

@eternaleffect2499

4 жыл бұрын

Yeah unlike *cough walter lewins cough* who is too arrogant

@juanjoseperez6282

4 жыл бұрын

@@eternaleffect2499 what did he do hmmm???

@phenomenalphysics3548

4 жыл бұрын

Yes!

@eternaleffect2499

4 жыл бұрын

@@juanjoseperez6282 there was a some controversy between walter lewis and ELECTROboom you can check it out yourself by seeing their videos. There was some disagreement over kirchoff voltage law and faraday's law. Where walter lewid was very arrogant and rude over it. In the end it was turned out that it's a matter of wording and modern definition.

@juanjoseperez6282

4 жыл бұрын

@@eternaleffect2499 thank you, I'll definitely check it out.

"even geniuses make mistakes" *Yes, yes I do.*

@sylv512

3 жыл бұрын

algebruh moment

@Kakashi___Hatake

3 жыл бұрын

Everytime

@MrOrangeonion

2 жыл бұрын

I know the feeling.

@-danR

2 жыл бұрын

been -their- there, done that

@eamonburns9597

Жыл бұрын

@@-danR *they're

I love your Einstein's stick figure with that hair

@maxnieves4641

4 жыл бұрын

Kinda looks like a bug with human body

@DoubleDom777

4 жыл бұрын

Max Nieves now I’m not going to be able to unsee that

@noahway13

4 жыл бұрын

He wasn't bald on top tho...

@burtosis

4 жыл бұрын

Wow that makes way more sense. I was wondering how bernie sanders could have possibly created stress energy tensor calculations. Maybe I should watch with the sound on.

@justpaulo

4 жыл бұрын

Friedmann's one is pretty cool too!

"If you don't want to make silly math mistakes like Einstein, try Brilliant"

@arsim612

4 жыл бұрын

I'm getting deja Vu

@thingsiplay

4 жыл бұрын

lol missed opportunity about the best advertising.

@ShafiqIslam

4 жыл бұрын

This is incorrect: Einstein realized the equations of General Relativity implied an expanding universe. He added the "cosmological constant" to the equations of GR to obtain the solution of a static universe, which is what everyone thought was the case, and at the time there was no reason to assume otherwise. The observations WERE NOT good enough to determine the universe was expanding -- those came in the 1920's, or about a decade later. Friedman simply obtained the solutions Einstein had obtained and did not make any extra assumptions. Einstein then considered adding the cosmological constant his "biggest blunder." You're misrepresenting the development of the ideas about cosmology that stemmed from GR.

@maczetamaczeta189

4 жыл бұрын

@@thingsiplay minutephysics actually used this very same line in his previous video about Einstein's constant, so no missed opportunites here. Just a repost by some youtube user.

@HarshKumar-sz8xk

4 жыл бұрын

@@ShafiqIslam Hey, if you want to copy somebody's else comment then atleast attach their name to it(Gildardo rivas) no matter if you do it for a good purpose.

My senior physics capstone project in undergrad was on quantum locality and contextuality, particularly looking at various proofs and disproofs of Bell's Theorem. Which was very confusing as an undergrad, trying not only to learn the proper math and physics behind what I was studying but carefully combing through the logic of the proofs and disproofs to figure out what was right or wrong. My advisor thought it would be an interesting project because there's a guy who is regarded by most in the field as a quack who is very adamant about his disproofs. Even navigating the academic politics of that was tricky. In some ways, I kinda wish I saved that for grad school instead but I digress. It gave me an interesting perspective on what is true and false in physics. And it was a major exercise in trying to distance myself from both the bias to agree with Einstein and the bias to disagree with the critic. Everyone wants to agree with Einstein because he came up with what is now a critical part of physics. But as you say, even he was human. He made mistakes. We all do. In that way, I think the best scientists among us are the level-headed ones with enough empathy to clearly separate correctness from popular biases. I just wish academia could be less political. And physics, especially, to be less egotistical. It is a plague.

@Hyporama

2 жыл бұрын

Wow. Such unrestrained observation. Unusual. Troubling.

@frankdimeglio8216

2 жыл бұрын

@@Hyporama BALANCED attraction and repulsion is fundamental regarding what is physics/physical experience, or there wouldn't be SPACE OR TIME. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. What makes gravity, ON BALANCE, a constant force is that it cannot be shielded (or blocked). Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy (in and WITH TIME) consistent WITH what is invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. SO, a photon IS at the center of WHAT IS the Sun; as this would then CLEARLY be consistent with the requirement of time AND SPACE. (Consider what is invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium AND BALANCE.) Carefully consider what is THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE. Consider what is a TWO dimensional surface OR SPACE ON BALANCE !! Consider what is perpetual motion, AND consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. Notice what is the associated black “space” AND the dome AS WELL. NOW, carefully consider WHAT IS THE SUN (ON BALANCE); as TIME is NECESSARILY (AND CLEARLY) possible/potential AND actual (ON/IN BALANCE). CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites ON BALANCE; as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky (ON BALANCE). Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma. Indeed, the ultimate mathematical unification (AND UNDERSTANDING) of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY (AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); as this CLEARLY explains F=ma AND E=mc2. AGAIN, consider what is TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE !! Again, carefully consider WHAT IS THE MAN who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground ON BALANCE !! BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental (ON BALANCE). By Frank DiMeglio

@xtac6435

Жыл бұрын

ayo what this mean bruh

@MukhtarAbdulGhanee

Жыл бұрын

@@xtac6435 lolll

@Arrogan28

Жыл бұрын

Sadly it's not just a critic on Physics, but on society as a whole I'm afraid. The issue is that so much of our economic position in life is tied to perception, rather then reality. And when a guy who throws a ball with a nice spiral can make literally 100-1000x times the salary of even the most successful physicists, it's crazy what society deems as worthy of praise, and the heaping of riches, and fame, and vs some brilliant breakthrough in math, or physics that come often barely make the news. I remember it was said that people who have so little power, when they find themselves suddenly with power, find it very seductive, because they have never had that before in their lives. Same with money, people who have never had money before, have no idea of what to do when they get money, and sometimes can lose all their money because of it. Society is crazy, we train physicists to learn the math, but what about dealing with success, or failure. So now people are going to try to choose to work on things they feel like will open those doors for them, etc, rather then what the physics is telling them they should investigate. That's the thing about Einstein, he was basically completely outside the academic circles, so he investigated what interested him, not what his graduate advisor told him to do... he had to do it all on his own, and that in many ways I am sure is why he was so successful. If Einstein was trapped in the present day university publish or perish environment, I have no doubt it would have likely crippled his output...

We can say Einstein had an algebruh moment Aight imma head out

@dybiosol

4 жыл бұрын

bruh

@jojoposter

4 жыл бұрын

Oh fuck why did i laugh

@oliobgmoti-bulgaria8401

4 жыл бұрын

Hahaha, that was a good one ngl 😂😂🔥

@imasiontist653

4 жыл бұрын

:(

@razi_man

4 жыл бұрын

We gotta bruh moment here

"The Friedmann Solution" Einstein: ;_;

@52flyingbicycles

4 жыл бұрын

TheYeetiest YT the only acceptable correction from Friedman

@Finkelfunk

4 жыл бұрын

Also Einstein: *Is literally the most famous physicist ever to have existed next to Newton*

@additivent

4 жыл бұрын

*Is this a Post-Weimar Germany Reference?*

@axollyon

4 жыл бұрын

That physicist's name? Albert Einstein.

@kkyrusobad

4 жыл бұрын

"The Friedmann Solution" Einstein: T_T

Einstein made a mistake. Me (struggling with medium math): "Heh...what a loser."

@klobiforpresident2254

4 жыл бұрын

Wait, what's medium maths?

@fgremmelspacher8775

4 жыл бұрын

@@klobiforpresident2254 Maths, still slightly red in the center.

@klobiforpresident2254

4 жыл бұрын

@@fgremmelspacher8775 Figures. My maths must be English then, because it's dripping red liquid from the corrector's pen.

@NJ-wb1cz

4 жыл бұрын

@@klobiforpresident2254 maths with the dead

@appa609

4 жыл бұрын

F Gremmelspacher what’s medium math?

This is incorrect: Einstein realized the equations of General Relativity *implied* an expanding universe. He added the "cosmological constant" to the equations of GR to obtain the solution of a static universe, which is what everyone thought was the case, and *at the time* there was no reason to assume otherwise. The observations WERE NOT good enough to determine the universe was expanding -- those came in the 1920's, or about a decade later. Friedman simply obtained the solutions Einstein had obtained and did not make any extra assumptions. Einstein then considered adding the cosmological constant his "biggest blunder." You're misrepresenting the development of the ideas about cosmology that stemmed from GR.

@pabloagustin8775

4 жыл бұрын

You are right Sir. This video is very basic and misleading about the cosmological constant

@rysus

4 жыл бұрын

True.

@Altobrun

4 жыл бұрын

don't forget that there is a cosmological constant or a 'vacuum energy' to the universe as was observed in the 90's when we learned that the universe wasn't just expanding it was accelerating. Even Einstein's bad ideas are good if you give them enough time.

@gildardorivasvalles6368

4 жыл бұрын

@@Altobrun: well, Einstein couldn't foresee what would happen later -- he was brilliant, not clairvoyant, and it was he who called it a blunder-- not me. But the notion of a cosmological "constant" started to appear before any observation of accelerated expansion. It was brought back even before, as quantum field theory was developed and slowly matured from the 50's and onward. The observation required very meticulous and precise measurements that had to wait for the appropriate technology to come about

@appa609

4 жыл бұрын

Mora well there was no data. Einstein was basically worldbuilding

Friedmann was "relatively" correct compared to Einstein.

@basqye9

3 жыл бұрын

"Generally" speaking, yes

@ligmaenigma6498

3 жыл бұрын

You could say both had a “special” thought process

@emc9029

2 жыл бұрын

"Theoretically"friedman was right

Great video! It is good to (try) and be aware of our biases. Anyone else notice that our biases seem to get more entrenched the older we get? Sometimes I tell an older person something different to what they believe, and it is like they have not even heard me.

@Akknights

3 жыл бұрын

Woah u had only 4 likes whyyy? Big fan

@FeigerNazi

3 жыл бұрын

so you assume that every person ("older"?older than you??) who is older (than what?) is the same? Nice demo of a biased youngster; I guess every young person believes older persons are biased?! You start to see your stupidity here....?!

@doctaflo

3 жыл бұрын

Most brains start shrinking almost as soon as they’re done growing-around age 25. it’s subtle at first, and if you live right or have good genes, the process is slower, but it accelerates over time. younger people just have more pliant minds on average. interesting side note: on autopsy, it was shown that Einstein’s brain, even aged over 70 years, showed many of the characteristics of a younger brain. but there’s a reason his most outlandishly creative contributions to science came in his early 20s. ditto Newton. (and Hawking... and most radical, paradigm-shattering scientific renegades :0)

@FeigerNazi

3 жыл бұрын

@@doctaflo everyone should know that. But I guess that`s also the reason why you cannot take someone younger than 25 serious if it`s about questions concerning life at all. "Always" when someone does not get the point of irony or sarcasm I know they`re not yet 25.... ;)

@yasyasmarangoz3577

3 жыл бұрын

@@FeigerNazi nice name

Even geniuses make mistake...learn, don’t be arrogant

@jasondelong83

4 жыл бұрын

"A true master is an eternal student" - Master Yi

@user-og9nl5mt1b

4 жыл бұрын

it's good to say that , but everyone is arrogant these days , do u even follow that urself .

@kuratse205

4 жыл бұрын

When writing a quote do check your english first :4head: mistakes* Not "...learn" use 'accept them,' and change "don't be arrogant" into "doubt yourself." So now go fuck off with your quote making, its not inspirational, helpful nor the truth.

@kucingtepijalan3459

4 жыл бұрын

@@kuratse205 rude

@Pimp482

4 жыл бұрын

k no

Einsteins equation was so complicated that the first man to actually be able to use it correctly got an entire concept named after him.

@2010sourabh

4 жыл бұрын

May i knw who that man was?

@General12th

3 жыл бұрын

@@2010sourabh Did you watch the video?

@teddy_miljard

2 жыл бұрын

Maybe he was wrong?

@pablocanovas2779

8 ай бұрын

Hmm, that title does go to someone else, Karl Schwarzschild, who anyone into black hole stuff will recognize that name

@priyank5161

7 ай бұрын

​@@2010sourabhbruh friedmann

0:48 'He plugged in empty space' Ah yes, as you do.

You mean the man who corrected Einstein *but was actually right*

@ViratKohli-jj3wj

4 жыл бұрын

@*GOD DOESN'T EXIST* roflmao

@Joe--

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly, Friedmann got it right.

@JorgetePanete

4 жыл бұрын

@*GOD DOESN'T EXIST* WOOO

@ettobaka9151

4 жыл бұрын

666 likes

@courtney-ray

4 жыл бұрын

That’s usually what “correct” means so...yeah

This is one of the best minutephysics videos I've watched in a while

@rbl4112

4 жыл бұрын

I just like that I can mostly understand it!

@robertofontiglia4148

4 жыл бұрын

This is one of the minutephysics videos there has been in a while

@futurestoryteller

4 жыл бұрын

You should watch the one on teleportation again, it'll make you never want to watch this channel.

@peterjongsma2754

4 жыл бұрын

Spider Man Except it's incorrect. See Comments .

@irokosalei5133

3 жыл бұрын

​ Except it's incorrect, like many of their videos...

after seeing a few of your videos, I really liked how you explain things @minutephysics good job

One of your best videos yet! This was incredibly interesting.

How I think everyone should think, "How can I disprove myself, then how can I disprove that?"

@lonestarr1490

4 жыл бұрын

That doesn't suffice. A counterexample being wrong does not imply that your statement holds. Even all counterexamples anyone could come up with being wrong won't prove your statement. Because the only thing that proves - once and for all - that there cannot be a counterexample to your statement is a rigorous proof of it.

@viliml2763

4 жыл бұрын

​@@lonestarr1490 It's hard to check if some complicated proof is actually perfectly sound.

@anuragbundela1483

4 жыл бұрын

@@viliml2763 Not really. A logical rigorous proof would be easy enough to follow for someone with enough knowledge in the field.

@thefourshowflip

4 жыл бұрын

Lone Starr I think you missed the argument entirely; the original comment never made any claims that this gives any confirmation/proof/etc for a given claim. It merely asserts a normative approach to (what I would call) skepticism...it’s essentially the mechanism of falsificationism (that we can only ever have certainty about falsities, not of truth...we can rule out erroneous solutions with certainty, but there is no way to confirm any a posteriori knowledge claims) Further, I think you’re conflating those two categories of knowledge...a posteriori and a priori. Never mind the finer points that still trouble some philosophers (as to whether math/logic is a priori or not); there is no proof of any a posteriori knowledge that can be offered in the way you’re seeming to demand...there is no formal proof for the earth being the third planet from our sun; it just so happens to be the case, but there is no proof one could put forth that would necessitate it (after all, that is what a proof is; if the premises are true, then it necessitates the truth of the conclusion as well, but there’s absolutely no reason why this planet had to be where it is...the earth could well have been where Pluto is, and while life would likely be non existent were that the case, it’s still possible... ) Similarly, how does one make a proof for gravity? It is an empirical fact that we live in a universe in which the effects of gravitational interactions are observed (I hesitate to say gravity “exists” to refrain from opening a giant can of metaphysical worms), but a proof of gravity’s existence would either need to rely on observation (in which case, one needs to argue that something other than purely deductive reasoning CAN lead to necessarily true conclusions) or else would need to demonstrate that gravity is a necessary component of reality (that it is an impossibility for gravity to not “exist”).

@thefourshowflip

4 жыл бұрын

Vilim Lendvaj Arguably impossible; there have been several attempts (of varying success) to extend Gödel’s incompleteness theorems to all systems of axiomatic logic, and it seems reasonable to suspect this to be a valid application of Gödel’s reasoning in his argument against arithmetic-based axiomatic systems...essentially, this (generalization of Gödel’s argument) would argue that there can never be an axiomatic system which is both consistent and complete, simultaneously. A quick argument is as follows: Assume you can map every single statement to a single truth value (one to one); also assume that you have a complete and consistent system of statements and axioms. You have a dilemma when you encounter the following statement: “This statement is not provable in this system” If the statement is false, then that means it IS provable, but a provable statement must be true in any consistent system, because a proof demonstrates the necessity of a conclusion. (You might be inclined to think that you can prove things don’t exist, but you’re not proving a falsehood, you’re proving the negation of a falsehood as being true...it sounds like a trivial distinction, but remember, we are currently in the domain of philosophy and in philosophy this is NOT a trivial distinction. The important point to note is that FOR ANY proof, the conclusion is always true if the premises are true, EVEN IF the conclusion is a “negative” claim, like “therefore the square root of two cannot be a rational number”). So because any provable statement must have a true conclusion, then we know it cannot be false...but that means it must be true...that this statement cannot be proven by the axioms, but if the statement cannot be proven by the axioms, then we cannot have a complete system, for there exists some statement which exists outside the space spanned by the axioms. Thus we cannot have a complete and consistent system; that is, there is no minimum set of axioms which can be sufficient to account for all possible knowledge (there are some truths which can only be derived if we expand our set of axioms). Gödel proved this for mathematics last century...it may well apply to all formal logic, and if it does, then to say it’s hard to validate the soundness of an argument is an ENORMOUS understatement (and may be impossible depending on how we chose to define things like knowledge and justification...if we are required to be justified in accepting every entailment of all our beliefs, it’s simply impossible for us to know whether an argument is sound at all)

"People find it far easier to forgive others for being wrong than being right." -Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore

@ilyamosin3090

4 жыл бұрын

"I'm gay" -Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore

@Ebani

4 жыл бұрын

@@ilyamosin3090 Lmao, that was j.k rowling tho, Dumbledore died without ever saying that, luckily.

@feynstein1004

4 жыл бұрын

Nitwit, blubber, oddment, tweak

@popocraft4677

4 жыл бұрын

That doesn't even make sense

@NJ-wb1cz

4 жыл бұрын

@@Ebani what's wrong with saying that you're gay?

Your intro alone is pretty much one of the best presentations of GR I've ever seen.

My bias is that tensor calculus is too tedious and thus it's okay to avoid learning it. You have just confirmed it.

Usually love your stuff, but this is a really rough interpretation of the history here. In Historian Walter Issacson's Einstein: His Life and Universe (a very well sourced academic biography written with Einstein's own notebooks) The generation of the Cosmological constant came about because Einstein knew the equations he generated caused expansion/contraction and the current experimental picture said that wasn't the case. (Chapter 11 pg254 of the kindle version) His blunder was not sticking to his original mathematical guns and predicting a non-static universe, because he literally had it. Not salt about a bad derivative or whatever

@Andromedon777

4 жыл бұрын

I am basing my knowledge off of Brian Greene's book, but didn't Einstein had the cosmological constant at 0, but it is really an extremely small but significant number?

@danielsteel5251

4 жыл бұрын

@yoda7104 Exactly. But the fact that Einstein's having _doubted himself_ was in fact the true "blunder" doesn't jive with the ethos being pushed here (i.e., an attempted illustration of the necessity of humility before and cooperation with a broader community). Hence some gentle reframing was employed.

@hammadsheikh6032

4 жыл бұрын

Daniel Steel on the other hand, the historian may have missed this one exchange of article, response, and retraction. This is pretty substantive, but we cannot expect one historian scholar to know all and everything. This is coming from a humble scholar...

@artdonovandesign

4 жыл бұрын

Correct. BTW: that is a Wonderful book!

@danieljensen2626

4 жыл бұрын

That isn't necessarily at odds with the explanation here. This video says that the equations only gave a static universe if it was empty (which it obviously isn't), and the cosmological constant was added so it could be flat and still contain mass. And it's worth noting it isn't exactly a straight up mistake, but he only found one solution to an equation with multiple solutions, and didn't look any further because it was the solution he was expecting.

I love the end note! It’s something I’ve embraced for ages, and you motivated it so well! Thank you :)

Einstein was focused on the universe (many lines of effort all at once). Fridman was focused on one piece of one part of Einstein's work. Glad someone picked up a pen to help him. Fridman is not greater than Einstein. And Einstein is a true gentleman for admitting his mistake and giving Fridman credit.

@charlesbaoumar6087

Жыл бұрын

The beauty of physics! Many great stories like this

@bumblingbiped5966

Жыл бұрын

Ok. But you're arguing against a claim that no one was making.

@akademesanctuary1361

5 ай бұрын

Einstein didn't make a mistake though. Friedman gave three solutions. The one in question is just one of those selected to fit popular cosmology. That selection ignores the mechanism of light, Huygens-Fresnel, and what Hubble's law actually did (used depth of the field to recover focus to measure distance). Redshift happens with distribution to the field, not just motion. If you read the reports close you see a pattern of confirmation bias, where they literally contract the numbers to confirm their expectations. The Deep Fields should be your big clue the modern cosmology is BS. Big bangs work, but only by their original design on a galactic level.

I'm impressed by Einstein that he admitted he was wrong and retracted his criticisms

@jasperjahnke

3 жыл бұрын

should be normal

@teddy_miljard

2 жыл бұрын

Oh yeah!

I'm too early. I will return later when the comment section will be full of memes

@abhilasha7344

4 жыл бұрын

Or rather just *"Nobody: Absolutely no one:"* or *"about to end this man''s career"* or *"Who all breath hit like!"* or *"Am i joke to you"* format garbage

@PopeGoliath

4 жыл бұрын

@@abhilasha7344 don't forget about all the people who want to know your location.

@avikdas4055

4 жыл бұрын

You forgot who's watching in 2019? And who love ""insert channel"" or minutephysics?

@Beck8669

4 жыл бұрын

Too early? it's already happening.

@namethathasntbeentakenyetm3682

4 жыл бұрын

Come back now.

"nails to hit" "T" I dig visual puns

@aasyjepale5210

4 жыл бұрын

that blue my mind

@Some.username.idk.0

4 жыл бұрын

I sea what you did there

@sorryididntknowwhattochoos2678

4 жыл бұрын

@@danielrunyon8534 The "T" is probably supposed to be a nail

@Some.username.idk.0

4 жыл бұрын

@@danielrunyon8534 blue and sea are puns

@tonydai782

4 жыл бұрын

@@danielrunyon8534 The "T" in Einstein's equation looks like a nail

I am glad you mentioned the biases we have. Its important to have people we trust around us to challenge our notions. Often I wish I had such a person in my life.

@teddy_miljard

2 жыл бұрын

True!

This Einstein guy seems pretty smart. He should’ve been a physicist or something.

@dentatusdentatus1592

3 жыл бұрын

Or a patent clerk.

@sheesmustafa9522

3 жыл бұрын

😄😄😄😄

@sonetagu1337

3 жыл бұрын

Or at least, an musician.

@pruthvirajshinde9991

3 жыл бұрын

Ok millennial

@sonetagu1337

3 жыл бұрын

@@pruthvirajshinde9991 thx boomer

Is Einstein human? Or is he dancer

@dawidmarcisz9831

4 жыл бұрын

His sing is Λ (lambda) His universe is cold And he's in Bern looking for the answers

@feynstein1004

4 жыл бұрын

Is he human? Or his he dancer? Paid his respects to grace and Friedmann Sent his condolences to Newton

@SweBeach2023

4 жыл бұрын

Friendmann was the son of a dancer though.

@rishavbro6931

4 жыл бұрын

@@SweBeach2023 yeah I know he was one of the fantastic four.

@youknowwho8925

4 жыл бұрын

Are you implying that dancers aren't human? 🤔😆

Just with maths and imagination ... This man predicted the things, we are proving right with our technical advancements after a century...

Nicely presented. Thanks

Wow this is interseting!

@HTJFilms

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah right ?

I love your videos but can you continue on the special relativity videos please

Here we go something I wont understand but makes me feel CLEVER

Fabulous! Great work!

3:00 When you tell a joke and noone hears it but your friend says it louder and takes all the credit

@zayanauntora9561

3 жыл бұрын

;_;

A good measure of one's intelligence is an ability to recognize and admit one's mistakes and correct for them in the future.

@yathishbl3757

4 жыл бұрын

Well we had a kid in our class who would recognize his mistakes and correct them which was a lot.....he'd score 30 to 40 in maths test ...so he's intelligent then 😂😂

When I first started learning Flutter, I had mindset that coding and designing should be in different areas while making apps and don’t like flutter in beginning, but as I learnt more and more then I came to know that I was wrong at all, now I love flutter and advice people to shift from java/android studio to flutter. So that was my bias in beginning 🙂

Hi Henry, can you please make a video about gravitoelectromagnetism? When I found out that there is a magnetic-gravitational force I was excited for the rest of that day... Relativity is amazing! You can even make it a continuation of the video "our ignorance about gravity".

When I'm wrong, I want to find out I'm wrong, then I learn something! :) Its great to be a skeptic.

I like how this changed from physic explaining video to some philosophical video about bias.

@rikwisselink-bijker

4 жыл бұрын

His track record is not perfect: his Simpson's Paradox videos have such a heavy bias that he shut down the comment section on part 2 (which then moved to the comment section of part 1).

Well done. This is a good example of telling a technical story that has a much deeper human truth at the core. Thanks!

This was really cool. Thanks for the great vid

Wow! I didn’t know this was even a thing!

I have a bias to the left. As I'm walking down the street I slowly deviate towards the left, so I use counter weights to balance this bias and I can walk a straight line.

@narfwhals7843

4 жыл бұрын

are you sure you don't just live near a black hole?

@InsaneDeck

4 жыл бұрын

@@narfwhals7843 Never really thought about that... But it might explain why people say I look older than I actually am.

@Andromedon777

4 жыл бұрын

@@InsaneDeck Actually, the opposite would be the effect. You would look younger (and to you, be younger, but to them, be older in their own years.)

@bakedutah8411

4 жыл бұрын

You don’t need weights. Just turn slightly to the right. I do that all the time with UK supermarket trolleys that have a duff wheel. Worst case I’ve found myself pushing the trolley with it turned a full 45 degrees from the direction of travel. Looks daft but it works.

@johnwythe1409

3 жыл бұрын

Do the cops know you can’t walk a straight line. Lol!

That's why conversations are important And listening to the entire story

excellent vid! thank you!!

I love when I'm wrong, it's the only time I truly learn.

Yes! A physics video!

Very nice video :) I really enjoyed that

Hi Henry, whenever we talk about Einstein, we talk about GR. But Einstein was instrumental in the development of QM as well. particularly in the early years. How about those? I think Einsteins work on early QM, Bose-Einstein Condensate, his work on Quantum Thermodynamics deserves some video. May b a series, may b just one video.

Tl;dr: Einstein got lost in the sauce and choked an equation. Friedmann found out and roasted him.

@zyugyzarc

3 жыл бұрын

do you use the operating system of the godly penguin?

"Understanding when we're wrong and graciously admit it" Hahahaha, tell that to flat earthers and anti-vaxxers hahahah, as if!

@thecryingsoul

4 жыл бұрын

They are also not scientists... or rational

@st3435

4 жыл бұрын

I want to thumbs-up this so many times.

@TheViolaBuddy

4 жыл бұрын

Part of the point of the statement, though, is to recognize that even if you do understand the fact that the earth is round and vaccines are overwhelmingly safe, your biases work in the same way that flat earthers' and anti-vaxxers' biases work. There are likely other false things that you believe just as strongly to be true and would be unwilling to admit that you're wrong about, even if they're not things that are so blatant. As the video says, all of us are human, after all.

@yorumcuu3113

4 жыл бұрын

@@TheViolaBuddy but if you are in the correct side there is no problem

@gouraveshsharma9547

4 жыл бұрын

The difference here between physicist and anti vaxxers is physicists have a ground in which they can agree and correct themselves however antivaxxers will make ubsurd assumptions to prove them right no matter what

What makes biases hard to overcome is the amount of your actions you have to reconsider when you question them. If you lived 30 years with some bias that now seems wrong, you need to rethink and live though all the situations where you've been using this bias once again like feel the guilt for proving a wrong thing to your friend, terrifying your colleagues with stupid requirements etc. That takes a long time usually comparable to the amount of time this bias was with you.

Excellent video. Many thanks for the many links to the relevant papers. Very interesting and worthwhile video.

this perfectly sums up my research paper ive written for school

minutephysics: its very hard to tell you have biases minutephysics editor: what biases do you have? me: lol idk you just said its hard to tell how am i supposed to know

Great lesson Have to subscribe and share.

I’m not sure what you said because I was too busy listening to the sound of your voice. I could listen to it 24/7. Only kidding - I totally understood what you said....and your delivery was fantastic xx

How cool would it be If minutephysics had the contract to teach science in schools.... Keep up the great work and thank you :)

@Ciph3rzer0

4 жыл бұрын

Will never happen because of the corrupt organizations in charge of curriculums and standardized tests. Plus, free doesn't make money, and as capitalists we are always slave to that.

Its kinda clickbait, but it has no lie in it. Schrödinger's clickbait

@Guimaster127

4 жыл бұрын

Nah, it definitely is clickbait, but it's not misleading, which is what I think you're referring to.

@finewinedaily4997

4 жыл бұрын

Clickbait doesn't really have a formal definition, but it usually implies that the title is misleading or exaggerating the actual content of the video. Otherwise any interesting or creative title could be called clickbait.

@Guimaster127

4 жыл бұрын

@@finewinedaily4997 That's because many creative titles _do_ use clickbait. But clickbait isn't actually bad, you know. In fact, a good title must be at least a bit "clickbaity" to catch everyone's attention. What's totally wrong to do is creating _misleading_ titles: those that don't represent the content of the video. Here's an example: Let's imagine that someone creates a video called "(game title) - STORY MODE CONFIRMED" , and the video is about an interview in which the developers of the game confirmed there would be a story mode. The title is clickbait, but it does represent the content of the video, so it's not misleading. Thus, that would be a good title for the video.

@kikones34

4 жыл бұрын

I think clickbait has a bad connotation associated with it, as such I personally only use it for videos which do not fulfill the expectations form the clickbait title. I understand that some people might want to use the word in a more neutral way, though, but the stigma associated with it is there.

@JorgetePanete

4 жыл бұрын

It's*

Ur graphic skills are as great as the knowledge that you share🤓

Very nice. Many thanks.

I’ve always assumed Einstein regretted the mistake because without it, he could have predicted one more thing that was unknown (expanding universe) and then when it was found to be true a few years later it would have felt great.

"This nebular is quiet af" - Albert Einstein

Cuando Einstein vino a la a la Republica Argentina estuvo entre otros con el doctor Colo, el cual fue profesor de la Escuela Naval Militar. Dicen las historias que ambos mantuvieron un intercambio de opiniones, cosa curiosa, ya que pocos entendian en ese momento las propuestas de Einstein. Tuve el honor de conocer personalmente al doctor Colo cuando ya era muy viejito.

I think it's equally tough to face the possibly being wrong+realizing+admitting being wrong, and knowing you're right+actually go after the titan in the field telling him he's wrong. Kudos, both Friedmann and Einstein!

"Something a little more in depth", shows one of their most basic courses when they have vector calculus, differential equations, special relativity and machine learning.

@Tondadrd

4 жыл бұрын

@@vesui2130 People can communicate in other languages. When you see somebody's bad English it might be their second language. Following this implication, then they probably mastered another language already.

@nafrost2787

4 жыл бұрын

@Vesui Well if you ask me, most of the daily challenges are more challenging and in depth than the math fundamental course. And besides that was a joke. If I had wanted to criticize, I would have phrased the comment differently.

@omegaRST

4 жыл бұрын

@@vesui2130 spend a little more time learning not to be a dick instead of criticising others, communicating is useless if what you say is stupid

3:48 "Einstein, like all of us, was human" *sad alien noises*

@vendybirdsvadl7472

4 жыл бұрын

*sad AI noises*

Plz make a video on pair production

You forgot Lamaitre, the equations are called the Friedmann lemaitre equations. He was from my university and my faculty as well, KU leuven:)

It.s sooo beautiful when i see scientists having feelings 😂😂😂

A true Scientist is always happy to be proven wrong, because he learned something new. I don't think Einstein was egoistic, he was probably happy that his Equations did in-fact predict the expansion of the universe. I think he was probably mad at himself for failing to realize it earlier.

@NJ-wb1cz

4 жыл бұрын

That's a total lie. Anyone who says that simply wants you to believe in scientific method, and it is indeed designed to fight against that exact human flaw. But scientists themselves can be as petty and butt hurt as any other people. In fact, pettiness and butt hurt are what often drives scientists to spend decades trying to prove that they are right and everyone else is wrong. And they sometimes succeed, sometimes posthumously. But oftentimes they do not, and the time they spend trying to prove themselves right is completely wasted.

@ElectroNeutrino

4 жыл бұрын

@@NJ-wb1cz I think the best way to put it would be an "ideal scientist". But we are still human, and don't always live up to the ideal.

@coolguy284_2

4 жыл бұрын

@@ElectroNeutrino Really it's not hard to approach the ideal if you try hard enough. waitbutwhy.com/2014/10/religion-for-the-nonreligious.html

Beautiful video

The INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind.

"...then he plugged in the universe..."

When your ego causes you to speculate that Einstein’s ego caused him to regret his blunder.

@alaididnalid7660

3 жыл бұрын

Lol!

Love this video!

This video is amazing, thank you. Can someone explain why d(sqrt(g) rho)/dt=0 means an expanding universe

What I like in a story is when they put real science making it look really good and that's why I want to be a novelist to put real science in it

*The Universe has entered the chat* *Calculus Student has entered the chat* *Einstein has entered the chat* *The Universe is now the admin of the chat* Friedmann: ...

Great video

A bit sad that the article about friedmann in wiki is a little more than a footnote. Wish someone would expand on it.

“If you are the smartest person in the world, doesnt mean you dont make mistakes” *- me*

Amazing video

i love how you draw sad einstein as having his hair drooping

The first person to should have corrected him was his teacher lol

I remember when I took a vector analysis seminar my senior year of college a decade ago and it was terribly technical. It’s hard morphing objects from Algebra 2 and Analysis into spaces that don’t translate them well because of the conditions of the spaces themselves. It’s no wonder that we have a litany of names for particular spaces that are bounded by certain conditions and their particular diffeo-operators. Banach spaces, Hilbert spaces, Minkowski spaces. The list continues

My bias: *WATER IS WET*

@HeilmwaterStudios

4 жыл бұрын

LOL

@RADZIO895

4 жыл бұрын

*WRONG* being wet means being covered in water and water can't be covered in water because it will just fuse into 1 blob of water

@sungoddessamaterasu5439

4 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/gqamxqiviNiXXdI.html

@snowman7514

4 жыл бұрын

water stick to water i agree with u

@farazshaikh1250

4 жыл бұрын

@@sungoddessamaterasu5439 Damn dude... I admit it, water is *NOT* wet 😂

I am always intrigued by presenting Einstein field equations with "down" indices. Indices should be "up" because only then the state equation is satisfied.

You start with facts then you end with opinions

2:24 "And Einstein eventually saw that Friedmann was right, so he admitted it and published a retraction of his previous criticism." Science, where changing your mind's a good thing.

@johnsmith1474

4 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't have mattered, the math is not dependent on Einstein accepting it.

@jmcsquared18

4 жыл бұрын

​@@johnsmith1474 Doesn't change the fact that changing your mind in the face of evidence is a good thing. At the very least, it's good for the person changing their mind. And when each individual's at their best, society's at its best.

@johnsmith1474

4 жыл бұрын

@@jmcsquared18 - You said, "science where changing your mind is a good thing." But changing your mind can be good in any field whatsoever. So your point is just kumbaya. The salient fact is that the correct equation was calculated not that some one person decided to accept it or not. Your extension to society at large (each at their best blah blah) is cliche piffle and a silly fantasy. Yes I am disallowing you your joy at your comment, because I want you to see it was trite.

@jmcsquared18

4 жыл бұрын

​@@johnsmith1474 "But changing your mind can be good in any field whatsoever." False. Counterexample: religion. My original comment was going to be, "said no bible verse ever," but I opted for a more positive remark. Does that tickle your fancy any better? My joy remains.

@johnsmith1474

4 жыл бұрын

@@jmcsquared18 "CAN" be good ... is always true. Read for content, avoid logical fallacies, stay honest with yourself you will have joy.

When you correct the smart kid in class

2:12 OMG man, he drew friedmann so accurately there. I can't take my eyes off it!

Make a video about Alcubierre’s warp drive

Einstein was totally aware of the Cosmological Constant he added. in your video you are talking like he wasn't aware of it. Funny 100 years later scientist are using his Cosmological Constant again to explain dark energy