*Yi gets demoted* *Japanese win one battle at sea* *Yi gets promoted back*

@alexkim2337

4 жыл бұрын

Korean king back then was a retard, just like the president now

@zebimicio5204

4 жыл бұрын

@@alexkim2337 Maintaining an army was expensive. Relieving an officer from duty during peace is quite common even today. No one expect Japan to attack the second time.

@bkjeong4302

4 жыл бұрын

Aiman Imran The dumb part is that the king actually wanted to execute him. Aside from the fact killing off an officer of that caliber during times of international tension is stupid, can you imagine the outcry from civilians living in coastal areas?

@Kriegter

4 жыл бұрын

@@bkjeong4302 what do you expect when they are the ancestors of kpop

@seungmyounglee1241

4 жыл бұрын

@@bkjeong4302 fun fact is that the same king saved Yi from getting executed before the Im-jin war.

Awesome!

Awesome video! So much history

2:28 Joseon and Ming: "winner winner chicken dinner" 2:41 Joseon and Ming: "aw shit here we go again"

Amazingggg

Yi had to get a back surgery after carrying the entire Korean nation

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

not plastic surgery?

@rete5132

2 жыл бұрын

Li Rusong got back to Ming only to get killed in an ambush by mongols in duty

Excellent work! I've read about this invasion many times before, it's fascinating. Oh, and the music is very good too!

@TheDragonHistorian

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks! Here are the songs used in the video (in order): 1. MapleStory - Sengoku Promo: kzread.info/dash/bejne/eXykzpJugNDaf9Y.html 2. MapleStory - Momijigaoka: kzread.info/dash/bejne/q5io3LCwhJO6qdY.html

@galacticpenguintv6752

7 жыл бұрын

***** Thank you very much!

@hayek218

5 жыл бұрын

Yi Sun-sin: Even though Korean wants to include Yi Sun-sin (李舜臣) as one of the three Greatest Admirals of the world, Horatio Nelson of the Britain who prevailed in the Battle of Trafalgar, John Paul Jones of the America who defeated the British for its independence, and Heihachiro Togo of Japan who defeated the Russia’s Baltic Fleet, he was not even a supreme commander, nor did he prevail in the battle that Koreans claim to have won. To start with, throughout their history, Korea was the weakest in the region. Since the time of Yuan Dynasty, Korea had been a tribunary state of China for almost one thousand years. They always asked other countries to fight for Korea’s domestic issues like in the Korean War, and this is why they have no true national hero. Yi Sun-sin was merely a commander of a single fleet out of many Joseon fleets, certainly not the admiral or the commander of the Ming-Joseon combined fleet. Not only he failed to defeat the Japanese navy, he could not prevent them on the sea, allowing them to land on the Korean Peninsula. In fact, in the first dispatch, Japan conquered Seoul within one month, and Pyeongyang within two months capturing the princes of Joseon as a hostage while there was NO Japanese commander killed except for one who was assassinated during hawking. Japan at the time was the hay days of samurai and had the largest number of guns in the world with many experienced samurai in communications and modern battle tactics of the day. Korea on the other hand was merely a tribunary state of Ming with NO guns. There is no way Korean could beat Japan by itself. The only military exploit that Yi Sun-sin had against Japan was when he attacked “a supply fleet” and temporally cut off its supply route. But this is by no means “destroyed" or “defeated." His strategies were more like those of pirates or guerrillas, setting fire on ships at night or attacking from the back of Japanese fleets after agreeing on cease-fire. Coward and so typical of the weak. And in the end, Yi was killed in a revenge batte of attacking Japanese after the cease-fire. Later, since the military leader of Japan, Hideyoshi, who planned to conquer China through Korea, died of old age in Osaka, Japan agreed on cease-fire and retreated. It is a blatant lie for Koreans to say that Yi Sun-sin was a great admiral of the world, defeated the Japanese navy, or is the one from whom the world’s other admirals learn from. However, you could say that he had some brain, avoiding front-to-front battle with the Japanese on the sea.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@@hayek218 Nice speech. Here's why its wrong. The chinese were extremely hesitant to help out, because it seemed to them that it was a lost cause, a hopeless war. Yi requested numerous times to the Ming emperor for backup, but every single one was rejected, especially after the entire korean navy was destroyed because (I'll admit) the korean king and commanding admiral were complete idiots and sent Yi to prison. It was Yi that convinced the Ming emperor to help out on the seas. Because thought the japanese were completely dominating the war on land, because of Yi, they were not able to take complete control of Korea. The video makes it seem like the moment the Ming arrived, they started winning. Though this is true, it underestimates the amount of influence Yi had on the outcome of the war. Saying the Ming won the war for Korea is like saying Canada won D-Day for the US because they sent 1 000 troops to dday and then SUDDENLY the nazis started losing. And just for the record, Yi did not "light ships on fire" while the japanese regrouped. He actually had lots of internal issues, with korean defectors lighting his ships on fire, if anything.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

August Hayek what about it?

기다리고 있었습니다. 이제 영상뜨는것마다 꼭봐야겠네요. 그리고 브금선정이 너무놓은거같아요

great work but can you please do more narrated videos?

I had a difficult time reading your subtitles with that background.

Man, I wish you had put the music...

So many ignorant and boisterous commentators with shallow nationalistic rhetorics from both my home country China and neighboring Korea. When can we learn from history in a more constructive way? I admire Admiral Yi Sun-sin's outstanding tactics and Korean's patriotism in defending their nation. But don't forget Ming's help and sacrifice from generals like Deng Zilong who fought bravely against the Japanese as well. China and Korea have a long history of friendship and cultural exchange. However, hatred-driven comments from the younger generation of China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam have pushed us East Asians further away from constructing our own entity like the EU to compete with the rest of the world.

@sandk7969

5 жыл бұрын

Its the same in Japanese history but its a bit true.. the reason is, almost no one liked Hideyoshi,.. he was born as a commoner, a commoner leading an army not that admired by Japanese which we all knows,Japanese is too prideful and full of themselves.. They were just there because of the Old Oda Clan, and of course they were waiting for a reason to overthrow the Toyotomi Clan,which then in 1598 after they return to Japan, Hideyoshi then killed its a bit suspicious if you see it after they go back they kill their leader, well we can assume the reason for their supply for not arriving at all two time at that. Ahhh. . I like everyone talking about who lost but didnt look at the reasons of their losses..

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

Eu is torn.brexit. China and korea is on its knees,now.

@yucekaghan8437

5 жыл бұрын

Actually genetically wise Korean are a close Chinese cousin not long ago and not now either

@zhess4096

4 жыл бұрын

Any EU like federation with East Asian countries would naturally be dominated by China.

Idk why under “navil victories” you put joseon. You could’ve just put “Yi”

@Kriegter

4 жыл бұрын

LOL

@bkjeong4302

4 жыл бұрын

Seriously the guy was the key figure in the entire naval theatre of the war from start to finish.

@bkjeong4302

4 жыл бұрын

John Wick Ming China did make a huge contribution on land, that is definitely true and not something I was unaware of. But the naval theatre was all Yi’s doing.

@mysteriouswanderer9633

4 жыл бұрын

@@bkjeong4302 Yi was a fantastic general and deserves a lot of credit, but Ming did send Chen Lin and the Chinese navy to assist Yi.

@leexingha

4 жыл бұрын

@John Wick sadly the bottom part of Korea is under heavy influence of a drug called USA

Why there are only one type blue color in this video. Is the blue mean only korea or only china ?

There are only one allies, u can write 'Ming' actually.

@user-mp9nh6st7y

2 жыл бұрын

Just Liaodong

@waterdropsfall

2 жыл бұрын

It wasn't a ally. It was a overlord actually.

@samc9725

2 жыл бұрын

@@waterdropsfall Qing was an overlord but Ming wasn't. Yeah it's true that Joseon tribute to Ming, but the meaning were close to friendship and allie, just like USA and korea. Ming could not interfere in internal affairs to Joseon. But Qing, they beat Joseon in war and make it's king to bow to him. And Joseon surrender to Qing. after this, Joseon couldn't remain fully independence.

@waterdropsfall

2 жыл бұрын

@@samc9725 A tributary state is a autonomous vassal. Korean kings were princes in Ming's political system.

What's the music in this?

Interesting facts. I don't know why, but it seems that Korean civilians were fighting Ming with Toyotomi Hideyoshi.

Many parallels between this event and the Korea War of the 1950s

@peiranzhang4283

5 жыл бұрын

no, not at all. The Chinese army in this war was the elite one, and won battles while outnumbered, where as in Korean war, Chinese army had to fight tooth and nail. Korea in this war was united, and actively supported the Chinese army. China pushed the enemy to the coast, twice, where as in the Korean war, the Chinese army only managed a stalemate.

@bkjeong4302

4 жыл бұрын

Also, the Korean War didn’t see gigantic naval engagements.

혹시 브금 뭔지 알려주실 수 있나요

Quote from nation invaded : "What are you going to do, invade me ?"

@gakidomo9561

3 жыл бұрын

Dio: I Dio will invade and weeblise you all! MUAHA- Jotaro: Oh, oh? You dare to challenge me??? This is just basically a conversation with Hideyoshi and Yi su-shin talkin lmao Yoshi.

#YiSunShin died in the last battle at #Noryang, marking the end of the #ImjinWar.

Taking the capital less than 2 weeks. Now thats what i call blitzkrieg. They did it before the germans lol.

@peiranzhang4283

5 жыл бұрын

Not really, the Korean army just ran away.

@capncake8837

4 жыл бұрын

Peiran Zhang True.

@leexingha

4 жыл бұрын

don't spread this but the japanese army during that time had a secret army that can use ninjutsu, genjutsu and taijutsu

The main reason of the Japanese pulling back from Korea during the second invasion was Hideyoshi's death. Japan was again torn apart in war and soldiers in Korea were called back to attend to their clan's needs.

@3freezeen

7 жыл бұрын

The main reason of the Mongolians pulling back from their invasion to Japan was due to Genghis Khan's death.

@frost587

7 жыл бұрын

Sam, Genghis Khan was dead long ago before Mongols tried to invade Japan

@Rui-03

5 жыл бұрын

@在日問題・背乗りの清算 you mean japan is the no.1 that time in the word ? So why did Mongolia have Asia and Europe, and Japan only has some little island?lol

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@frost587 pathetic khans couldn't invade japan because of forest, seas and mountains

@tigeriontigerion9112

4 жыл бұрын

@@Rui-03 The only people Mongolia could beat are Chinese and Horsemen. Indian, Vietnamese, Japanese, Egyptian, German and even Javanese could stop their invasion. Mongol is just overrated due to their vast territory. Chinese should realize China has been always weak, at least compared to its size lol.

I'm back! In this video, see how Toyotomi Hideyoshi's ambitions led to a disastrous war resulting in the loss of millions of lives. The war led the Joseon dynasty of Korea into a spiral of decline (I have a video on that too, by the way :P) and, coupled with other conflicts, put an enormous strain on the Ming dynasty's economy, leading to its eventual subjugation by the Manchus. As for Japan... well, Toyotomi ended up dying and his family fell from their position of power. By the way, the reason why the negotiations for a ceasefire lasted 4-5 years is because Toyotomi kept demanding such ridiculous things as: -Taking the Ming imperial princesses as his concubines -Receiving the southern 4 of Korea's 8 provinces -Taking captive all of Korea's princes

@major3569

7 жыл бұрын

So，you are a typical Korean.The Wanli Korean War was just one of Ming’s wars at that time.In the same period, 4 wars were related to the Ming Dynasty,the other 3 search for 宁夏之役Battle of the Ninxia（1592CE）, 播州之役Battle of the Bozhou（1598CE） ，明缅战争War in the Ming and the Myanmar（1584~1606CE). I tell you the truth, Myanmar was much stronger than Japan in the same period.Many Japanese and Korean think only “The Japanese Invasion of Korea” Leading to the Ming Dynasty weakened,this is very ignorant and funny.The world is much larger than the Koreans see.

@TheDragonHistorian

7 жыл бұрын

龘龖龍育月 Master "Ming China also sustained a heavy financial burden for its role in defending Korea while also fighting several other conflicts in the same decade. The war also indirectly weakened China's position in Manchuria, which gave the fledgling Manchu chieftain Nurhachi an opportunity to expand his influence and territory. Nurhachi's expansions would culminate in the eventual collapse of the Ming Dynasty and the rise of the Qing Dynasty in 1644." -Wikipedia, citing Prof Barry Strauss, an American historian I'll add that other wars also contributed to the collapse of the Ming in the original comment.

@savagecpt2847

7 жыл бұрын

Under the rule of the Wanli Emperor, Ming China quickly interpreted the Japanese invasions as a challenge and threat to its tributary system.[36] The Ming's interest was also to keep the war confined to the Korean peninsula and out of its own territory (to avoid territorial destruction);[37] they entered into the conflict by dispatching reinforcements to attack from the north. In the engagements that followed, the majority of the Joseon army was focused on defending the northern provinces from Japanese offensives, while also supporting Ming army campaigns to recapture territory occupied by the Japanese. These Ming-led land campaigns, combined with the naval warfare waged by Joseon navy, eventually forced the Japanese army to withdraw from Pyongyang to the south, where the Japanese continued to occupy Hanseong and the southern regions with the exception of the southwestern Jeolla Province.[21][22][23] The pursuing Ming and Joseon armies attempted to advance further into the south, but were halted by the Japanese army at the Battle of Byeokjegwan.[38][39] Subsequently, the Japanese armies launched a counterattack in an attempt to reoccupy the northern provinces but were repelled by the defending Joseon army at Haengju fortress. Additionally, Joseon's civilian-led Righteous Armies actively waged guerrilla warfare against the Japanese forces in the south, which weakened the Japanese hold in the cities they occupied.[40] Afterwards, with supply difficulties hampering both sides, neither the Japanese nor the combined Ming and Joseon forces were able to mount a successful offensive or gain any additional territory, resulting in a military stalemate in the areas between Hanseong and Kaesong. The war continued in this manner for five years, and was followed by a brief interlude between 1596 to 1597 during which Japan and the Ming engaged in ultimately unsuccessful peace talks.

@ihateyoutube2209

7 жыл бұрын

The Dragon Historian they say that this is probably the deadliest war in korean history... korean war death toll is 2.5 million... so how many people died in this war?

@MisterNi

6 жыл бұрын

The Dragon Historian Thanks for this video. I've already read the 2017 re-writing of the English Wikipedia article on the "Imjin Wars" and it's mostly written from the Japanese perspective but still fairly written I suppose. But seeing a map and timeline of the war makes it much more clear that even the first Japanese invasion was doomed to failure as soon as the invasion stalled near what looks like Pyongyang and then pushed back to Hansong. There was just no way the Japanese army could feed itself with such poor logistics which were also under constant disruption by Joseon's navy. I think I'll read "The Imjin War" by Samuel Hawley as it's one of the very few books written on the 16th century Japanese invasion of Korea that is written in English and with the Korean perspective in mind. In the US, what little literature available on the Imjin War is written from the Japanese or even the Chinese perspective but never from the Korean perspective. Most likely because the political outcome of the war was negotiated exclusively by Ming and Japan to the exclusion of Joseon.

Did these ships have cannons during battle?

@galecarp

5 жыл бұрын

No. Otherwise the Korea can not have won the sea battle.

@meisterproper8304

5 жыл бұрын

HistoryBuff75 yes they did. But Korea had better cannons and a more developed navy

@galecarp

5 жыл бұрын

@@coinstand4991 Yes. The general Yi is a hero of whole east asia.

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@Lynz Ally you mean koreans and chinese couldn't invade japan? Yes you're right

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@coinstand4991 false information The reason is why korean won was because all korean fleets were superior than japanese fleets during that period

Ugh - the music has got to go - or at least get toned down.

Josen: HAHA, Japan we got you! Japan: Just wait..., just wait. Josen: Wait for what? Haha *About 300+ years later* Korea: Well shit..., China help? China: Japan is kind of kicking our ass too..., so no.

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

lol,you are ignorance.At that time,Japan possessed overwhelmingly power over the Korea .But Hideyoshi Toyotomi died,Japan Withdrew from korea. sorry my bad english.

@TNTheihei

4 жыл бұрын

@@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre in my viewpoint,''Hideyoshi Toyotomi Japan possessed overwhelming power over the Korea .'' is ture.But at the same time,Hideyoshi Toyotomi is so difficult to conquer Joseon,because Wanli Emperor has protect Joseon.

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

4 жыл бұрын

@@TNTheihei because hideyoshi died,if Hideyoshi lived a long life,Korea was Japan,and Ming surrendered to the Hideyoshi.

@TNTheihei

4 жыл бұрын

@@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre lol,Don't delusion so much, even the Ming dynasty In decline,it still a Super power in East Asia,over 300000 man ming dynasty Elite soldiers placed in the north. We can see after The Japanese Invasion of Korea,Ming dynasty Have another Large military operation,that was a ''Yang Yinglong rebellion''.Ming dynasty Quickly mobilized 200,000 troops,Destroyed the lord of this separatist place.Also,in Wanli Emperor Middle reign,he still Concerned about political affairs,the government also has a large number of powerful generals and bureaucrats,finances are still sufficient. I agree that Hideyoshi is a Great monarch,he is a big challenge for Ming dynasty,But even he can Live longer,he still difficult to Beat the Ming army and Conquer North Korea.Other important thing is his regime is not stable internally.

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

4 жыл бұрын

@@TNTheihei 万暦の三征 is Bohai rebellion,Bozhou rebellion,Hideyoshi invantion. chinese history book said "This invasion(hideyoshi invantion) for seven years was a disaster which damaged both land and people of Korea heavily and became one of the reasons for the subvert of Min Dynasty by a burden of enormous costs and waste of" sorry my bad english

Your presentation is not accurate. Ive search in wikipedia about the casualties and losses: Korea: army : 185,000+ killed[11][12] 50,000~60,000 captives[11][12] Total military: 260,000+[13] Total army + civilian : ~1,000,000[14] 157 ships[15][16] China: 30,000+[17] Japan: 100,000 + soldiers killed.[18] 460+ ship

@user-cd2yq1gw1b

5 жыл бұрын

Wikipedia is inaccurate

@peiranzhang4283

5 жыл бұрын

@@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre Yeah I mean Japanese navy won any naval battles besides when Yi was gone? Did Japanese navy won a single battle against the Ming navy? Lol you guys attacked a country that didn't have a single war for a century, then got rolled over by the most powerful nation in Asia, nothing to be ashamed of

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@xuesonglu5314 conqueres

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@xuesonglu5314 i wonder if korea connected to japan

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre yes 460 ships is true fact

admiral yi hard carry moment

Admiral Yi was *THE MAN* .

@Engjuehan

2 жыл бұрын

yi just a little troop leader down below chenlin(CHIEF NAVY GENERAL LEADER), magui(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF GENERAL) and yanggao(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF COMMANDER)!

In this war died much more people than in Viet wars combined. And again, very few Westerners know about this war.

@user-pe1qz3rt3f

Жыл бұрын

It’s Japanese’s tradition to murder civilians in all their invasions.

Admiral Yi was the Korean equivalent of the British Admiral Nelson. Both achieved major naval victories, and both died in their last battle which was a big success

@Engjuehan

2 жыл бұрын

Noryang battle: Ming ships：269 Joseon ships：60± Japanese ships: 500± Yi Sunsin ain't that matters

@Engjuehan

2 жыл бұрын

yi sun sin WAS just a little troop leader down below chenlin(CHIEF NAVY GENERAL LEADER) magui(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF GENERAL) and yanggao(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF COMMANDER), KOREAN DIDNT TELL YOU THE TRUTH

@mk.115

11 ай бұрын

​@Engjuehan. I think u are just talking about the last naval battle of imjin war. There are far more battles in imjin war. Such an idiot

watching this because of kingdom Netflix

After war Joseon keep survived ming END....

@freethinker810

5 жыл бұрын

@アイヌは原住民ではない。 日本は中国の子孫です

@Keith626

5 жыл бұрын

@アイヌは原住民ではない。 ... Ming won Japan ...

@dragilxcom4176

5 жыл бұрын

@在日問題・背乗りの清算 Japan never won anything. They thought they were strong, ambitious to invade all over Asia, but in the end they never could hold anything. Only in the 20th century they finally realized that.

@Rui-03

5 жыл бұрын

@在日問題・背乗りの清算 but this video the great ming kicked little japan.lol

@Keith626

4 жыл бұрын

Ming:Korea and Japan are too weak

Gō

1-24 Id just go around and invade from Primorski

Hey are you korean because I am

@mappingchinese2078

7 жыл бұрын

yes

@mappingchinese2078

7 жыл бұрын

he is korean

@yisunshin39

7 жыл бұрын

+mapping chinese I love your alternate history videos! You should make more

Japanese Casualites about 50.000

안녕

@Kevin-km2zo

3 жыл бұрын

@@harlibedvii 한국인인데 왜? 문제있음 ?

@Kevin-km2zo

3 жыл бұрын

@@harlibedvii 韓国人だけど、問題ありますか？

@Kevin-km2zo

3 жыл бұрын

@@harlibedvii 일본에 살음 ㅇㅅㅇ

This war was the Afghan war of the Ming Dynasty

what allies? if there was only one xd It was Ming China

I think admiral 이순신’s contributions to the outcome of the war the way it was is 90%.He cutted the japanese suply line thus the japanese couldnt advance further on land.Of course Ming China helped and even one of the chinese generals deeply respected 이순신,but most people just dont realise what a battle it was.Just imagine 13 ships vs 133.In this situation everybody would pee his pants and run for his life.But 이순신 knew that this was life or death situation.And he saved the Korean nation.My respect general🙇🏻‍♂️!!!이순신 장군 만세!!!🇰🇷

@jsasa1861

4 жыл бұрын

He cut the supply line to North Korea and saved China. But he was unable to cut the main supply line through the strait between two countries.

@user-tt2vu6sk6c

4 жыл бұрын

He was the only Korean able to fight effectively against Japanese though

@Andy-sp2ke

4 жыл бұрын

南島民國超級大桶領 Yeah i agree on that.The goverment was pretty corrupt at the time since Korea was pretty much at peace for 200 years.So joining thr military wasnt seen as prestigue as compared to like being a confusian scholar.

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

STFU Ming Dynasty's contributions to the outcome of the war was 99%

@Andy-sp2ke

2 жыл бұрын

@@zedz4397 You mean the Ming general that got into a trap and 이 had to save him?Ahah learn history bud

The birth of DPRK ,

Well atleast they get what they want 300 years later😄and this time they did not miss anything, defeated both china ( qing dynasty) and the Joseon. Even greater that 50 years later on they captured China and most of Asia🥲

When Kato arrived in where is not 함경북도, there was a rebellion Joseon had to quell, done by a famous general called 정문부

You know that the northern border of korea was drawn by the japanese when they annexed korea, so the northern border isn't that accurate.

@user-sg8dp8ql9v

6 жыл бұрын

King Sejong the Great, 4th Army 6th Confirmed North Border

@69MadnezZ

6 жыл бұрын

TheKhanate yes. true.

@kimjeongyeon5640

5 жыл бұрын

No

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

Treaty of Shimonoseki 1: China recognizes definitively the full and complete independence and autonomy of Korea, and, in consequence, the payment of tribute and the performance of ceremonies and formalities by Korea to China, that are in derogation of such independence and autonomy, shall wholly cease for the future. Articles 2 & 3: China cedes to Japan in perpetuity and full sovereignty of the Pescadores group, Formosa (Taiwan) and the eastern portion of the bay of Liaodong Peninsula together with all fortifications, arsenals and public property. Article 4: China agrees to pay to Japan as a war indemnity the sum of 200,000,000 Kuping taels ( 7,500,000 kilograms/16,534,500 pounds of silver ). Article 5: China opens Shashih, Chungking, Soochow and Hangchow to Japan. Moreover, China is to grant Japan most favoured nation status for foreign trade. (which is equal to, not above, the trade relations granted to UK, US and France in 1843-44 and Russia in 1858) The treaty ended the First Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895 as a clear victory for Japan. In this treaty, China recognized the independence of Korea and renounced any claims to that country. It also ceded the Liaodong Peninsula (then known to the Western press as Liaotung, now southern part of modern Liaoning province), and the islands of Formosa (Taiwan) and Penghu (also known as the Pescadores) to Japan. China also paid Japan a war indemnity of 200 million Kuping taels, payable over seven years, and the signing of a commercial treaty similar to ones previously signed by China with various western powers in the aftermath of the First and Second Opium Wars. This commercial treaty confirmed the opening of various ports and rivers to Japanese trade. As a result of the Treaty of Shimonoseki (1895), China recognized the "full and complete independence and autonomy" of Joseon. In the next year Yeongeunmun was demolished leaving its two stone pillars.

What is "History" about? Is it for political or ethnical conflicts? or human itself? I believe I'm not wise enough to answer this question, but just hope the undergoing and following researches will help people form health ethnicity and empathy. People nowdays tend to only focus on "statics" and figure out accurate territories and ethnicities. Of course, those works are important to solve morden issues though, not the all of its role. It has no use as a subject, if unable to represent the vision to understand human and only aggravates the conflicts. we need to think of that people at that period also had their own lives and that you're also a part of the history which will be recorded in the future. In addition to arguing with truth of the history, we need to live more independently and try to make wise political division, with the lessons from the past, as an individual.

Good job 👏 korea🇰🇷

전라도 쪽이 지배당하지 않았다는건 처음알았다

@KBKim-jt6uj

6 жыл бұрын

이순신 장군님 해군기지

@user-kl4xg6up4c

5 жыл бұрын

리순신장군께서 계셨지

@KBKim-jt6uj

2 жыл бұрын

@에러 2차 진주성 전투에서 진주성 함락이후에 권율이 이치 전투에서 또한번 막았죠

I like the poster materials in general but whatever it takes past Korea history it always exaggerate to as if the Avengers are Koreans. It is ok to admit you were a small power before and don’t feel inferior to it. You are much stronger now and no one looks down on you. Just be peace with your self past.

皇明神武

@user-wg4es5fl1y

4 жыл бұрын

@Davis Speak Chinese！

@user-wg4es5fl1y

4 жыл бұрын

@Davis 只有廣西人吃狗肉，蝙蝠也是很少人吃。你這個可恥的種族主義者，racism

@yiheming8911

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis you mean Palau, Nauru, Vietnam, Laos, south Korea? oh, American and Japanese also eat bat, deer, dog, bear, badger, beaver, wolf, fox, whale, you fucking racism.

When Japan invaded Korea in 1592, Korea was defeated on all fronts. The Ming Dynasty of China, which was supporting Korea at this time, fell into a financial crisis due to this war. I'm sure you're only learning history that is convenient for you, so I'll tell you this: Of the three great conquests of Banreki, this war was the one in which the most silver was spent. His other two wars combined did not reach the funds used for this war. More than 7.4 million taels of silver were used in this war, while in other wars he used 800,000 taels and 2.4 million taels of silver. Approximately 80,000 Japanese soldiers died during the two dispatches to Korea, but half of them died from infectious diseases and the remaining 40,000 died in battle. To kill these 40,000 people, the Joseon Dynasty lost 260,000 soldiers and the Ming Dynasty lost 38,000 soldiers. Where is the victory? Including civilian deaths, the total number of deaths in the Sino-South Korean coalition is likely to exceed 1 million. This war was not a big deal for Japan, but the Ming Dynasty and its vassal states suffered irreparable damage (lol) The number of troops dispatched to Korea at that time was 150,000, 25% of Japan's total military force. was. was. Do you know of any small country that could not protect itself from this 25% total military force and asked China for help? (Laughs) Then Japan made peace with the Ming Dynasty and withdrew without paying any reparations. By the way, the Joseon Dynasty was refused participation in negotiations by China. It seems that there was also a sailor who was considered a Korean hero who made a surprise attack on the retreating Shimazu and was killed by Shimazu's casual soldiers. Did you know that during the heyday of the Edo period, Japan was an economic power that surpassed Britain and Spain, and even just before the Meiji Restoration, Japan's GDP was slightly higher than that of the Ottoman Empire? Did you know that even just before the Meiji Restoration, Japan's per capita GDP was half that of the United States? Korea has always been a small country, but Japan has always been a large country.

Allies😂.There is only one country was helping Korea,and they are not turks

@EgemenSahin

6 жыл бұрын

why do you hate the Turks?

@user-vm3sg4ye1b

6 жыл бұрын

Egemen Şahin He is being sarcastic as Koreans kept associating themselves with Manchus mongols and Turks and look down to chinese, however in this war, the ally reinforcements that Korea received was from China l.

@BuRsTiNxMLB

5 жыл бұрын

厲害了你的國 I’m a history major and China has historically bullied the hell out of their smaller Korean neighbor. Not to mention this war was started because Korea wouldn’t let Japanese troops free passage to attack China.

@dyu8831

5 жыл бұрын

SanFranGiants14 well obviously Japan needed to conquer Korea first to achieve anything meaningful, that Korea “refused their request” was just a pretext. You really believe that 157000 Japanese soldier would just peacefully pass through the country if Korea let them? And who with a right mind would let that huge army into their country without any resistance? Not to mention that at this time contact between the imperial governments of Japan and Korea&China were extremely limited, and in the latter‘s eye the former were not much more than a bunch of barbarians and pirates. I don’t disagree that Korea was subjected to bullying in the past, but I mean if you’re in history major, what would you expect? That big country would never bully small countries back then? During the Ming dynasty relations between two sides were generally very good.

@BuRsTiNxMLB

5 жыл бұрын

D Yu Never did I once say it was unexpected. You clearly lack cognitive skills because you took most of what I said out of context and assumed many other things.

Admiral Yi is legend

serious, why Korean never made and game online about their own culture and history? I really tired have to play game online which based on Europe culture already.

@dongf2618

7 жыл бұрын

really trash? The Korean peninsula was almost all lost to the Japanese in little more than a month. It is a common knowledge in East Asia that Korea always held their allies back, both the Chinese and the Americans.

@thehunteroflight1637

6 жыл бұрын

yevon sama nevermind with these unrelated comments. Anyways if they made a game out of this like *Far cry: Imjin war* I'd buy it XD better than call of duty nowadays

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

korean history was not Interesting

The navy of Korea was very strong.

@user-ni1fh8fr9h

4 жыл бұрын

Lol?if not Ming korea already finish stupid

@user-ni1fh8fr9h

4 жыл бұрын

Blue is the colour lmao so u mean Ming doesn’t help u when Japanese invade u little Korea?

@user-ni1fh8fr9h

4 жыл бұрын

Blue is the colour keep fucking dreaming

@user-ni1fh8fr9h

4 жыл бұрын

Blue is the colour don’t u know u Korea is vassal of Ming?😂😂

@user-ni1fh8fr9h

4 жыл бұрын

Blue is the colour stupid shit

Japan says it should be grateful for the unwarranted invasion of Korea because Japan built all of Korea's economic infrastructure. However, South Korea lost all of its economic facilities in the Korean War caused by the North's invasion. Korea started again from zero. Japan's absurd claim is that Japan should be grateful for the Korean War for the massive rise in Japan's economy as it procured large amounts of military supplies. Japan is a mean country. They do not educate their youth about this history.

@A_a_A_a_A_a_A

2 жыл бұрын

Japan doesn’t say so lmao You just want to make Japan look bad, and you're seeing illusions

@Kunfucious577

2 жыл бұрын

@@A_a_A_a_A_a_A do you believe that or just trolling? It’s well known that Japan was equal to or worse then Germany in their treatment of their conquered countries. They had work camps, comfort women and human experiment sites that last for 30-40 years japans goal was to illuminate the cultures of their lands and turn everyone Japanese. Saying that Koreans are just butt hurt about this is equivalent to saying the nazis weren’t that bad and slavery in the us was made up. We all know you would never say something like that because that would be racist.

@user-sb6xs8ge6y

2 жыл бұрын

일본은 아직도 우리에게 사과를 하지 않아요.. 우리 할머니는 일본군 때문에 고아가 되셔 학교도 못나왔고 몸에도 상처가 많았어요 우리 할머니는 아직 그때에서 벗어나지 못하고 있어요 일본은 나쁜나라이며 뻔뻔한 나라입니다 제발 알아주세요

@HungPhan-hn7ug

2 жыл бұрын

Excuse me but you guys were the same in the Vietnam war, and the Japanese didn’t rise at that time since they were being occupied until 1953, both Japan and S.Korea rose during the Vietnam war which is around 10 years ahead of the Korean War. Thus your government “borrowed” Japanese books to make your own book, literally copied the Japanese in almost everything. Continue with the Vietnam war, you SK troops massacred our people, burned our villages like monsters, the American had some mercies, while your “pitiful” troops killed our children, our women. Hell they even had to kill their babies(because they cry) so that you guys won’t know where we were hiding! We lived in hell hole for 30 years,all we need now is just an apology and just move on. But judging from your behavior recently like how you nagged us in 2020 because you guys claim “UpPeR cLaSs”, even when japan and Korea apologized us in 2016. You guys aren’t any different from your northern neighbor. That does make sense why it took japan 70 years to apologize,you guys deserves those treatments than anyone else. Some Japanese soldiers from WW2 fought with us during the Vietnam war, they even helped us after the US lift the embargo like giving us some of their old technologies. We were grateful because of those because of how the embargo annihilated us, maybe the famine in 1945 caused by the Japanese was insane and unforgettable, we still forgive them because how they treated us right after. But we will never forgive you guys for you genocides, please stop being butthurt towards the Japanese. You dirty rats will never get a proper apology when you guys just keep acting like “we were the only victim of the Japanese” while looking down, treat us southeast asian even worse than those “lower-classes” in your damn society,deny everything you did to us. Don’t get me wrong, what the Japanese did was unforgettable and unforgivable, but you guys weren’t any different and y’all totally deserved it.

@user-hn4qr8ty6f

2 жыл бұрын

@@Kunfucious577 South Korea was the first to attack Japan. If South Korea had not invaded Japan with the Mongol Empire, the Japanese would not have a grudge. Most of the Japanese who lived in Tsushima and Iki were slaughtered in this battle. I think this war is a revenge at that time. Koreans have not apologized or compensated yet.

Damn. Admiral Yi is a BAD ASS!

조선 왕조 역사의 전반부와 후반부를 나누는 사건

大明威武！

That is why Japan tried again in 1895 with a better navy

@tigeriontigerion9112

4 жыл бұрын

Nope, lol. Korea was nothing at this war, that's why no Korean was invited to the ceasefire meeting. It was just Japan vs Ming war.

@antaeheyn

3 жыл бұрын

@@tigeriontigerion9112 lol. It was korea vs japan. Most japanese army died frim korean army. In the tHis war, Ming is always defeated...ㅋㅋ korean army kill 100k japanese army alone.ㅋㅋㅋ

@nimishibalnyon8143

3 жыл бұрын

@@tigeriontigerion9112 wakojin desu ka? wwwwwwww

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@antaeheyn Your history book tells you this? LOL

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@antaeheyn Without Ming's help you weakass would've surrendered to Japan in a week

Japan Gangsta until Yi gets promoted back

Japan must have had a TERRIBLE navy...

@jacksank98

6 жыл бұрын

It's mainly because of OP turtle ships that Korea had and Admiral Yi-Sun-Shin was a master at using them. Japan's navy was decent for a country in East Asia in that time period.

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

Battle of Chilcheollyang that was current capability of korean navy. thankyou In the meantime, the Japanese Navy ultimately destroyed the Russian Baltic Fleet in the Battle of Tsushima.

@marlarki5280

5 жыл бұрын

Nope Japanese navy is fucking terriible before modernisation. It has nothing to do with turtle ship been op.

@ToyotomiHideyoshiGre

5 жыл бұрын

China and korea their navy is more weaker than japan navy.

@jacksank98

5 жыл бұрын

@Lynz Ally Yeah Chinese help was a big factor too

Chinese and korean have argue in this comment section lol

@yucekaghan8437

5 жыл бұрын

Just like a small trouble about kids rice and who stole it 🤣🤣🤣

>Japan took Seoul and Pyongyang less than a month after the invasion >China took Pyongyang back less than a month after they came to rescue Korean nationalists: This war was won by the Koreans! The Chinese contribution is exaggerated!

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@Cyprusball >Argentina: supplies the UK with supplies such as ammo and food >Allies: wins war >S.P.Requiem: so about that war Argentina won...

@oaaisjdujsi

5 жыл бұрын

@Cyprusball ussr 10000 died in the pacific war and killed 21000 Japanese Usa 100000 and killed 1.5million Japanese in the pacific war Ussr-> we won Japanese

@hwasiaqhan8923

4 жыл бұрын

1701 MatteoYoon China didn’t send a few thousand, they sent 80000 in the first war. China’s contribution in the war was comparable to USA in world war 2 not Canada, your examples are so bad and invalid.

@jackjackyphantom8854

2 жыл бұрын

@@hwasiaqhan8923 I mean u are an Chinese, so how credible ur statement can be? I don't believe there isn't any biasness from ur perspective.

@hwasiaqhan8923

2 жыл бұрын

@@jackjackyphantom8854 Go away vietnamese, I remember you and stop stalking me weirdo

한편 우리 한국 친구 들이 어떤 선전 배원은 역사 때문에 혼란스러웠다

It's more of Ming China & Japan rather than Korea... As the suzerain of Korea, Ming China forces fought the major battles on the ground, and the court of China is the one who negotiates with Toyotomi Hideyoshi. This video just downplayed the role of Ming Dynasty... Shame

@jaypeedesuyo662

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis Quit blabbling, Face it , Without the chinese aid, Korea would have fallen.

@jaypeedesuyo662

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis Lol! Ignorant sinophobic yankee troll. Keep bitching about it for the rest of your miserable life. The world would be nothing without the influence and innovations of Chinese civilization. You will still be stuck on the dark ages until today. 😂 5000 years of history and counting, China will continue to exist until the end of times. It already outlived many civilizations and countries. So suck it up yankee. 😂

@jaypeedesuyo662

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis Keep deluding yourself. Your delusions won't change reality. 😂🤣

@jaypeedesuyo662

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis Thanks for proving my point yankee troll. Keep deluding yourself. You don't have anything else to argue back other than throw stupid remarks. Lol! Ignorance is a bliss. 😂

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

Finally someone who brings up the truth

At that time, Japanese naval sucks a lot.....

Joseon and allies🤣 It's more like "Joseon and its owner"😂

@in00n

Ай бұрын

Joseon was never owned by Ming or Qing.

🇰🇷🇨🇳❤

@user-tt2vu6sk6c

4 жыл бұрын

Modern nations are not equal to ancient Kingdom and Empires. Regarding international relations, it became totally different.

@schwarzerhaufen1727

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-tt2vu6sk6c yea by that time you koreans called us fathers QwQ now we are equal

400 years from now, South Korean would claim the Korean War was fought by South Koreans themselves and the US Army's involvement is negligible. (North Korean is already saying the same thing about Chinese Army in that war)

@jaypeedesuyo662

3 жыл бұрын

@Davis Lol! What a stupid idea. And it would most likely to backfire. One of the examples of Yankee retardation right there. Add to the fact the Soviets already have the atom bomb by this time. Things would not change. 😂

This is bullshit,you try to erase Ming Dynasty from the war,but in fact this is not a war between Korea and Japan instead it was mostly fought between China and Japan, Korea was useless and almost conquered by Japan, that was why Korea begged Ming Dynasty for help.Most of the open field battles were fought between China Ming Dynasty and Japan in korea lands, Korea only had some minor naval victories over Japan.

@TheDragonHistorian

7 жыл бұрын

How did I try to erase the Ming from the war when I made sure to include that all the war negotiations took place between China and Japan, and that Korea was not allowed to be involved? Did I, anywhere in the video, suggest that the Ming dynasty's role in the war was insignificant? Or are you just delusional? And provide me with a source to prove the claim that most of the land battles were fought between China and Japan.

@ValianTiger

7 жыл бұрын

You tried to erase Ming from the event by using the title" Joseon and allies" by right you should put "Ming and Joseon" instead,you should know the fact that before Ming China entered the battle Korea was almost gone case,the entire Korean peninsula was almost conquered by Japan, if without Ming China's help nowadays there would be no more korean race. You tried to emphasize the sea battles that korea won over Japan but you ignored all the more important land battles,if without the land battles fought earlier korea would be gone, Korea was weak in field battles and lost rapidly during the earlier stage of the war,most of the land victories against Japan were won by Ming instead of Joseon,Korea relied heavily on China to fight the field battles,that was why Jeseon called Ming troops as "天军" - soldiers from the heaven, this shows how much Koreans admired Ming China's armies during that time.*****

@TheDragonHistorian

7 жыл бұрын

***** The only reason I put up a separate naval battle counter is because naval battles cannot be easily shown on the map (similar to what EmperorTigerStar did with his Anglo-Dutch Wars video). And I'm pretty sure viewers can decide for themselves the Korean army's performance in the early stages of the war. You know, from the fact that Korea lost two provinces and their capital to Japan in two weeks. And while the Ming army was indeed instrumental in repelling the Japanese forces, the Korean civilian-led Righteous Armies played a major role as well - they were at the least more active than the Korean government's forces. "Joseon and Allies" is more fit than "Ming and Joseon" because, first of all, it started as a conflict between Joseon and Japan and it essentially ended the same way, and thus putting "Ming" in front of "Joseon" seems like a strange idea. (Besides, anybody who's able to read the notes by the side would know that Joseon and "allies" basically means the Ming dynasty and her vassals.) The war was *entirely* fought within Korean territory, more Korean troops were killed than Japanese and Chinese casualties combined, and the war's most long-lasting effects were indeed on Korea. It's not like the First Sino-Japanese War where the war was fought in Korea but Korea was not an active participant. And about the Koreans calling the Ming army "soldiers from Heaven" - that was not because of the Ming intervention in this war. Joseon had called the Ming dynasty things related to "Heaven" since the beginning. Sending envoys to Beijing was called "Visiting Heaven" by the Joseon government. This attitude would change during the Qing dynasty, when sending envoys to Beijing became "Visiting Yan" rather than Heaven. The practice of calling the Ming "Heaven" was not a practice deriving from, or limited, to this war.

@clementyang5260

7 жыл бұрын

So true lol

@Wandrative

7 жыл бұрын

The Chinese alliance did minimal help. It would have been better if you people did not come and 'help' the Koreans to begin with.

I WONDER IF THEY CONNECTED LANDS RIP CHINESE AND KOREANS

@faceface2039

4 жыл бұрын

Mongols: ??????

@saitamayourdaddy7008

4 жыл бұрын

@@faceface2039 Japan should not be mess

@zedz4397

4 жыл бұрын

If Japan is connected to the asian continent, then the country would have been destroyed immediately.

@jackjackyphantom8854

2 жыл бұрын

@@zedz4397 Japanese would had already been invaded by the Chinese.

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@jackjackyphantom8854 Japan would simply be another Korea.

Jeoson and allies? the main battals during this war were btw Ming and Japan, the army of Jeoson was almost demolished...

@Antitititi316

2 жыл бұрын

That is not true. Army of Joseon protected 'Jeollado' province from the Japanese, Also, after 2month from the start of the war, Joseon's army slowly pushed the Japanese from the land. Well, this was because Admiral Yi had successfully removed the supplies going to the Japanese.

@reddhong6665

2 жыл бұрын

@@Antitititi316 no, you cannot modify the history...

@Antitititi316

2 жыл бұрын

@@reddhong6665 I'm sorry, but after June 1592, Japnese army slowly pushed back by Joseon. In June, there were 17 land battles. 4 battles are launched by Japan, 13 battles are launched by Joseon. Japan won 6 battles, Joseon won 8 battles. 4 battles: draw. Also, the famous 'Secon battle of Jinju-fortress' that Japan had won, and gave the Japanese the opportunity to conquer all of Jeolla-province, was a Pyrrhus' victory. As you can see, 2months after the start of the war, Japan had to change their strategy into 'attack&conquer' to 'defend&attack'.

The Chinese in the comments: > china sends troops to korea, and wins. So the war must be a Chinese victory against Japan! Me: Canada sends 1,000 troops to D-Day. SUDDENLY, the nazis start to lose. So, plot twist: Canada won world war two.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@Cyprusball well, ObViOuSlYyYyY

@galecarp

5 жыл бұрын

It were 140,000 trained professional troops. Round 30.000 death of soldiers and 140,000 horses. The number shows that Ming dynasty not only participated this war but also were a major force throughout the whole war affair. To summarize: The alliance between China and Korea had won the war against Japan.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@@galecarp hey, I'm not saying China did not have any part. I'm just pointing out that China only joined the war effort after seeing Yi Sun Shin destroy the Japanese fleet at Myeongnyang. I think a lot of the division comes from not knowing how crap the foot soldiers were on BOTH the Chinese and Korean sides, and also how amazing Yi Sun Shin was. Without Yi, even with the Chinese, the Imjin War would have been lost to the Japanese.

@galecarp

5 жыл бұрын

@@MatteoYoon I must correct some mistakes of your previous comments. 1. You have written "I'm just pointing out that China only joined the war effort after seeing Yi Sun Shin destroy the Japanese fleet at Myeongnyang." : Myeongnyang battle happened on 1597-09-16 during the second invasion. China participated the first invasion on 1592-06 with 50,000 troops, which ended in year 1593. The second invasion began on 1597-02 and China sent its troop on 1597-02 and arrived in Korea with 30,000 troops in 1597-03. So you see, China participated the war far more earlier than the Myeongnyang battle with a large troops. Your comment is wrong. (Data from wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasions_of_Korea_(1592%E2%80%931598)) 2. 李舜臣Yi Sun Shin's main contribute is to limit the supplies of the Japanese troops, which is great and legend. But he is just a part of the whole war. The people, no matter Chinese or Korean, spent their lives to fight face to face with 140,000 Japanese troops and attacked the good defended cities which Japanese occupied, contributed more than Yi Sun Shin. Without them, Japanese could easily dominate all the ports in Korea and the fleet of Yi Sun Shin has no where to go. You have not only insulted the chinese soldiers which died in this war, but also the 18,000 Korean dead troops and millions of korean dead civilians which have fought for the mother land in this war. 3. I think without Yi, the war will last a little longer. But the Japanese have also their limit of war potential. Japan at that time war not comparable with the war potential of Korea and China combined. But the victory of Yi has saved a lot of civilian in Korea and raise the confidence, which is deserved the name of hero. But giving the the victory of this war to Yi is totally wrong. The victory is because of the contributes from all Korean people and the helps from China.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@@galecarp ok. I made it sound like I'm a terrible Korean nationalist. Let me rephrase, sorry! Yes, Ming China had a HUGE impact on the outcome of the war. But they were reluctant to join because of how CRAP the Korean foot soldiers were. However, Yi Sun Shin's navy was the exception. He lost exactly 0 naval battles, and devastated the Japanese navy and supply routes. He is the sole reason why Korea didnt instantly lose to Japan. He cut the supply lines from Korea to Japan using his navy, and thus, it didn't matter how terrible the Korean foot soldiers were doing, because the Japanese soldiers were trapped inside Korea now. Seeing this, as well as a 12 vs 200 victory for the koreans in the battle of Myeongnyang in 1597, the Ming joined the war effort. And then, yes, the foot soldiers of the Ming were able to push back the Japanese. But not without Yi Sun Shin. I'm not exaggerating, literally, without him, China would have lost. Here's why I say this: In one of the final naval battles of the Imjin War (I forgot the name), the Ming and Korean navy's were fighting alongside each other. Yi was actually shot and and killed, but his plan to surround the Japanese fleet and flank them was carried out by his son. When the battle ended, and the Ming general saw that Yi had died, he weeped, saying "even in death, Yi has saved us." Even the Chinese general back then admitted that without Yi, the war was hopeless.

The superiority of Japanese firearms is overrated.

@jsasa1861

4 жыл бұрын

Navy of Korea as well.

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@jsasa1861 true

so funny to see Joseon and Allies, hahahhahhahaha, shouldnt it be Joseon and Father instead?

@user-lv4rb9si5n

3 жыл бұрын

Sadly no one responds to this little girl.

@liran547

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-lv4rb9si5n truth always hurts, my man, LOL

@liran547

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-lv4rb9si5n so you really have no counter to say, besides attack personally....is that typical in Korea when you run into a argument?

@liran547

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-lv4rb9si5n reply on the topic or walk away, dont waste yours and my time, your reply is meaningless and doest counter my point of view at all, all you saying is really like a tennage kid.....stop reply

@user-lv4rb9si5n

3 жыл бұрын

@@liran547 Is it typical in your country to be damn rude to someone who conversate with you? It must be a shitty country you are living. There's no one replying for you cuz your comment is not even worthy to spend time. Maybe that's why there's nobody around you. Fine, I'm leaving. Don't reply anymore; a little girl from poor country. Chao!

You guys are ungrateful to not mention China.

@SuperPunchout3

6 жыл бұрын

Why is it that Chinese get so butthurt that they're not mentioned?

@easterner819

6 жыл бұрын

库兹涅佐夫尼古拉·格拉西莫维奇· *allies*

@langcheng4480

5 жыл бұрын

@@SuperPunchout3 Because this war was basically won by Chinese, Korean king fled to China and lost control of 7 provinces out of 8 before Ming forces arrived

@KBKim-jt6uj

5 жыл бұрын

Hey chinese. stop bragging. we koreans also helped Ming dynasty against Manchurians in battle of Sarhu. we are kinda relationship to help eachother.

@jackjackyphantom8854

2 жыл бұрын

@@KBKim-jt6uj Chinese sees Korean as inferior, not equal. That's why Chinese always downplays Korean history.

근데 왜 요동이 조선땅이라고 되있죠?

ALL FROM CHURCH MEMORY CARE IN :ESTER...WHILE SHEPHERS WHATCHES THEIR FLOCKS...FRANCINE ZAMOR COU D'ETAT..ON JEROME LOUIS

乱中日記 was diary of Yi Sun-sin.this diary said “賊船三十隻撞破”Yi attacked ３０Toyotomi ship.not 460 ship.only 30 ship and only attacked,not sank. sorrymybad english. but ilovehistory^^

All Korean should appreciate China (Ming) if not Ming u Korean already conquered by japan

侍の力

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

Koreans crying rn

Japan's damage was minor. Most have returned home.

@junhyoung6237

4 жыл бұрын

Also Toyutomi over and start Aedo cuz many of them are dead

@Antitititi316

2 жыл бұрын

You liar. That is not true.

어디든지 중국인이 역사 관련 영상에 달라붙으면 시끄러운 아수라장이 된다. 😅 그들의 유아스러운 습성은 언제나 변하지 않을듯

hahha

@yucekaghan8437

5 жыл бұрын

Koreaboo lol

The SOLE reason Korea was able to win against Japan is that Ming sent troops to help Korea.

@KBKim-jt6uj

2 жыл бұрын

The SOLE reason Qing China was able to win against Russia is that Joseon sent troops to help China.

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@KBKim-jt6uj Joseon sent troops? You weakass Joseonjin cannot even fight against Japan, and now you think you can help Qing?

@KBKim-jt6uj

2 жыл бұрын

@@zedz4397 Lol. Qing outnumbered Russia but still wrecked by them. Qing asked help to Joseon. Joseon just sent 260 elite musketiers and they just wiped them out. Chinese donno how to fight...

@zedz4397

2 жыл бұрын

@@KBKim-jt6uj Your Koreans' dream are absurd. You can keep making those pathetic things up to cure Your wound from knowing what a loser Your ancestors were, but it doesn't help.

@KBKim-jt6uj

2 жыл бұрын

@@zedz4397 While Weak Han Chinese Ming dynasty fallen by Babarian Qing Manchus, Joseon still independent. youre typical mind winning method.

첫 장면에서 지도에 문제가 있네요. 조선시대까지 대마도는 조선의 영토였습니다. 그래서 해방 후 미군정에 대마도도 우리 땅이라고 했지만 맥아더는 일본 사람이 산다며 이를 거부했죠. 일본은 영토 분쟁이이 될까 봐 쉬쉬하고 있습니다. 그래서 일본 고교생의 70% 가량은 대마도가 한국 땅인 걸로 압니다. 그리고 대마도 자체 주민들도 일본으로부터 소외되고 국가의 지원도 별로 없어 여차하면 한국에 귀속되길 원하는 사람도 꽤 있습니다. 그래서 대마도 사람들 스스로도 '국경의 섬'이라고 부릅니다. 실제로 가서 겪어보니 그 섬 사람들 성격은 일본인보다는 경상도 사람에 가깝더라고요.

@MTA1593

5 жыл бұрын

@재희현 애초에 정벌을 했는데 우리땅이지 누구땅이냐.

@scv54031

5 жыл бұрын

정벌을했지 점령은하지 않았는데? 그리고 대마도정벌은 고려후기인가 조선초기아님? 임진왜란당시 일본군 대마도에서 모여서 침공했는데 먼조선땅이야ㅋㅋ

@scv54031

5 жыл бұрын

@@MTA1593 님 논리면 일본이 조선땅 점령했었으니 일본땅이내?

@MTA1593

5 жыл бұрын

@@scv54031 ㅋㅋㅋ 실록에 우리땅으로 표기되어있는데 어쩌라고.

@MTA1593

5 жыл бұрын

@@scv54031 니말대로 라면 4군6진은 우리땅 아니네?

难道朝鲜人没有丝毫感激之情？

@papercat2599

4 жыл бұрын

中国是最冤枉的国家。现代黄种人对亚洲大国的中国严重歧视。我们以前是真的辉煌不仅历史长而且除了个部分时间段一直都是骑在这些国家头上的。他们真的是有种羡慕嫉妒恨。

@nyanmypico3423

4 жыл бұрын

@@papercat2599 韩国已经够仁至义尽了，有感激之情的已经被杀完了懂吗？

@papercat2599

4 жыл бұрын

Nyan MyPico 韩国就是个西方殖民制度。怎么可能被允许喜欢中国

@zedz4397

4 жыл бұрын

韩国人自卑的很，所以特别扭曲

Noryang battle: Ming ships：269 Joseon ships：60± Japanese ships: 500±

Around this time, China was weak. China later requested Japan for reinforcements. Japan was the world's largest army(700,000) at the time.

@Rui-03

5 жыл бұрын

but that time japan's army more weak than ming army. one ming army=five japan army.this is the reason the great ming defeated little japan

@rete5132

2 жыл бұрын

china never requested japan anything except for it to becomes china vassal. you prolly wont recognize it caus your views are absurd i can see

@user-hn4qr8ty6f

2 жыл бұрын

@@Rui-03 This is the war between Ming and Japan. The King of Korea has fled to Ming from the beginning and abandoned Pyongyang Castle. Akira, who lost in the Battle of Byeokjang, is proposing peace to Japan, so it is a victory for the Japanese side. I think China was strong in the Tang dynasty.

@popnancy-ji1zd

5 ай бұрын

Are you kidding? China was at war with Japan at that time. Do you think China asked Japan for support?😂

yi sun sin WAS just a little troop leader down below chenlin(CHIEF NAVY GENERAL LEADER) magui(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF GENERAL) and yanggao(INJIM WAR'S CHIEF COMMANDER), KOREAN DIDNT TELL YOU THE TRUTH

The only reason both China and Korea stand now is because of one man, Yi Soon Shin. The Chinese were not cooperating with Korea or taking the war seriously or even participating. The Chinese were on a picnic frankly speaking. Korean government was full of disloyal minsters and a brainwashed king who accuses true loyal subjects for disloyalty and treason. It’s a miracle that Joseon (Korea now) survived this war. Yi Soon Shin was a blessing to both China and Korea.

@augusthayek4957

5 жыл бұрын

Yi Sun-sin: Even though Korean wants to include Yi Sun-sin (李舜臣) as one of the three Greatest Admirals of the world, Horatio Nelson of the Britain who prevailed in the Battle of Trafalgar, John Paul Jones of the America who defeated the British for its independence, and Heihachiro Togo of Japan who defeated the Russia’s Baltic Fleet, he was not even a supreme commander, nor did he prevail in the battle that Koreans claim to have won. To start with, throughout their history, Korea was the weakest in the region. Since the time of Yuan Dynasty, Korea had been a tribunary state of China for almost one thousand years. They always asked other countries to fight for Korea’s domestic issues like in the Korean War, and this is why they have no true national hero. Yi Sun-sin was merely a commander of a single fleet out of many Joseon fleets, certainly not the admiral or the commander of the Ming-Joseon combined fleet. Not only he failed to defeat the Japanese navy, he could not prevent them on the sea, allowing them to land on the Korean Peninsula. In fact, in the first dispatch, Japan conquered Seoul within one month, and Pyeongyang within two months capturing the princes of Joseon as a hostage while there was NO Japanese commander killed except for one who was assassinated during hawking. Japan at the time was the hay days of samurai and had the largest number of guns in the world with many experienced samurai in communications and modern battle tactics of the day. Korea on the other hand was merely a tribunary state of Ming with NO guns. There is no way Korean could beat Japan by itself. The only military exploit that Yi Sun-sin had against Japan was when he attacked “a supply fleet” and temporally cut off its supply route. But this is by no means “destroyed" or “defeated." His strategies were more like those of pirates or guerrillas, setting fire on ships at night or attacking from the back of Japanese fleets after agreeing on cease-fire. Coward and so typical of the weak. And in the end, Yi was killed in a revenge batte of attacking Japanese after the cease-fire. Later, since the military leader of Japan, Hideyoshi, who planned to conquer China through Korea, died of old age in Osaka, Japan agreed on cease-fire and retreated. It is a blatant lie for Koreans to say that Yi Sun-sin was a great admiral of the world, defeated the Japanese navy, or is the one from whom the world’s other admirals learn from. However, you could say that he had some brain, avoiding front-to-front battle with the Japanese on the sea.

@SultanS5

5 жыл бұрын

August Hayek you have no idea what you are talking about. Go read real history and I will consider arguing with you.

@hayek218

5 жыл бұрын

I did. It is YOU who cannot read your own true history as they are all written in Chinese characters. It is YOU who cannot even CHECK who is telling the truth. All you can do is to regurgitate the fabrications that your stupid government keeps on fabricating in order to hide the fact that they are so ashamed about: Jumong, Gojoseon and Goguryeo were not Korean but only conquered a part of Korea; the kings of Silla were Japanese from Japan; since the time of Yuan Dynasty, the Korean Peninsula was a dependency of China for almost one thousand years; Korea was so poor and hopeless that their ancestors asked Japan to annex and modernize; the independence of South Korea was not fought for, but it was given by the US.

@dyu8831

5 жыл бұрын

While it's true that Yi did a lot of the work and that Ming did not really tons of effort into this war, the main forces on land were still Ming soldiers, without whom the war could not have been won. I don't know where you got the impression that "The Chinese were not cooperating with Korea or taking the war seriously or even participating". Almost every major land battle after 1593 were mostly fought by Ming soldiers. Pyongyang, Byeokjegwan, Jiksan, Ulsan, Sacheon. They also provided substantial naval support in the final battle of Noryang.

@freethinker810

5 жыл бұрын

sorry but Ming Dynasty can crush Japan easily, and without China's protection Korea will not exist now. stop over deify Yi Soon Shin and neglect China's protection for Korea

Korea invaded Japan first

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

Korea, both North and South, has never invaded nor attacked another country in its 5000 year history. They have fought amoungst themselves, but never have they taken over nor attacked another country. I am not sure where you got that fact, but I would like to know.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

actually, I just looked through your "liked" videos. I don't need to know where you got that fact.

@user-rg1lu7tn6s

5 жыл бұрын

1701 MatteoYoon 5000 years? Since when did Korea become so old? Even older than China’s history of 4000 years?

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-rg1lu7tn6s well, ok. *Technically* Korean history is only about 2000 years and Chinese is 4000 years, but that's only recorded history. People have lived on the Korean peninsula for 5000 years, and in China for 6000 years.

@MatteoYoon

5 жыл бұрын

@@user-rg1lu7tn6s actually, no. The first korean country, I guess you could call it, was the Gojoseon Samguk Yusa, which dates back to 2333 BCE.