3:45 “Would anybody claim this horizon is formed by earth curve?” Yes. This particular one is formed by the curve of the hill the tracks are going over.

@slappingthebass2271

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂👆🏼

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@slappingthebass2271IKR! Brian thought the railway disappeared because of perspective 😂

Poor Falzoid. So delicate that he can't handle a few facts.

3:00--I am calling this moment the "compression" and "foreshortening" of the distant vanishing point which it doesn't seem globeflakes take into consideration. Before you comment on my post, all you GSWs, I have numerous episodes on my playlists where this is discussed. I also show, in my own footage with my own drone, the h rising with the drone's eye.

@poopytowncat

Ай бұрын

What's the name of the video?

They manufacture curve instrumentation. Classic.

Keep up the good work man gotta get the truth out there

0:45 “I’m making a series on how the horizon works in reality or on flat earth” Nice admission that flat earth isn’t reality.

Well done on being less specific than Flatzoid about what “relative to eye level” means. The horizon will always be somewhere relative to your eye level. The question is how that relative gap changes with altitude. And the answer is that it will appear lower relative to eye level as you increase altitude. Exactly as expected on a globe.

@indio007

Ай бұрын

"Exactly as expected on a globe" Nonsense. The horizon does not do that. He even showed you an example. Felix Baumgartner. The horizon is the same at 10 ft as 128000 ft. Here's anther example Mr Beast "space" trip. There's fisheye nonsense is exactly the same at altitude (93 miles) as it is on the ground.

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@indio007So what is your explanation for all those photos with the horizon *measured* to be lower _relative to eye level_ at elevation than at sea level? The Baumgartner and Beast photos don’t have measurements.

@indio007

Ай бұрын

@@andrewjohnston6631 the horizon is not a physical geometric location. Only globers claim it is. You don't need exact measurements for those observations because the dip should be 8 degrees and 12 degrees respectively. Which is EASILLY visually discernable when compared to images taken from the identical camera showing identical horizon placement.

Why is there no formula to show the horizon distance on a flat earth?

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

I spent about 5 weeks in the comments of a Brian’s Logic video trying to get SiMan/Kiwibuzz to give the flat earth derivation for dip correction - which of course is based on horizon distance. Between all the insults and dodging, the best he could come up with is that it’s something to do with two or three parallel planes or parallel lines. I’ve had the same discussion with TB. He was certain that you reduce the sighted *angle* by the observer’s *height*

@brianleake7762

Ай бұрын

Coming in part 3

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@brianleake7762 🍿

@slappingthebass2271

Ай бұрын

Cause it’s not a physical place dumb dumb

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@slappingthebass2271Awesome! So you can see forever across the surface of the earth.

2:15 Fog causes the horizon to appear lower??

@brianleake7762

Ай бұрын

I will demonstrate that in part 2

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@brianleake7762 🍿

@slappingthebass2271

Ай бұрын

😂👆🏼Bro is spiraling he has left 10 comments already

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@slappingthebass22714. You suck at maths, but that’s typical for a flerf.

You realise that this is not a measure of anything right?

No, it still doesn't. #GottaLieToFlerf

You guys just fucking take a Nikon and spend couple of minutes on a shore, there is no cutvature and will never be.

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

Can you explain how spherical excess can be observed if the earth is flat?

@poopytowncat

Ай бұрын

The shore is the wrong place to look. Can you explain how a horizon is formed on a globe earth? Can you explain how a horizon is formed on a flat earth? Why would a horizon look flat on a flat earth?

@indio007

Ай бұрын

@@andrewjohnston6631 it's not observed. it's created. Do you think lines of sight are curved? LMAO

@andrewjohnston6631

Ай бұрын

@@indio007Let me rephrase it for you: How do you explain that the sum of the azimuth angles between three locations on the surface of the earth exceeds 180°?

@indio007

Ай бұрын

@@andrewjohnston6631 you don't have measured azimuth angles. You have reduction of the vertical direction done by calculation using a reference ellipsoid. Why do you even think a reference ellipsoid exists in the first place? As well as a geoid. Stop listening to the dunning kruger MCTOON.