Hungarians do have a bit of proto uralic ancestry, hungarians have been known for (quite some time) to have mutations in the EDAR gene found almost exclusively to asians & uralic peoples, which change teeth shape & breast milk production

@arkle519

6 ай бұрын

Does it make it more or less?

@ThighErda

6 ай бұрын

More. EDAR is a gene which indicate Uralic, Native American & Asian Ancestry. @@arkle519

@noraheist

6 ай бұрын

Yes I notice traits in myself and my family of that gene so I wouldn't state there is 0% Uralic gene in us but maybe 1-5% max.

@StrangerSpace

3 ай бұрын

You must mean _some_ of today Hungarians have a bit of proto-Uralic ancestry.. Because, say, Magna Hungaria hungarians (Magyars) had and those made their way from there to modern Hungary have not less than 60% of Uralic ancestry..

@van-596

2 ай бұрын

Венгры и башкиры один народ

So we all come from the Nganasan, I knew it all along. Those people are our spiritual elders

@matrixdukenukem0000

Ай бұрын

Hungarians are Turks

@PoppopPoppipappaa-vo7in

14 күн бұрын

Sad That they are Almost Extint

The sami map is slightly wrong. There were and still are sami settlements/settlement on the norwegian coast all the way down to Trøndelag. My grandfather is from the forests of Trøndelag. Aside from that it was really depressing to see how quickly the the peoplegroups started vanishing in Russia after the turn of the 19th century. I've met some Sami's from the Kola peninsula and never have i heard them speak their own sub-language and 2 of the ones i've met just gave up on their sub-language in favour of North sami which has more speakers and more books for learning and courses.

Very interesting. Could you do about origins and spread of the first farmers in the world, please?

For what I know there are three disputed homeland locations for Uralic people. The more accepted is on the Kama river west of the Urals, the secondth in west syberia and the last in central asia between caspian and aral seas. I never heard about this one depicted here

@The_Geographer_Maps

11 ай бұрын

This map uses genetic data, not just linguistic and archaeological data. It all depends on which genetic source we choose. I preferred to choose an East Eurasian source called "Siberian". The Nganasans have a maximum of this component (96%), so we can assume that the Uralic homeland was located near the Nganasans. An alternative source could be the West Siberian hunter-gatherers (WSHG) who lived in western Siberia and Central Asia, but it is less significant than the Siberian component among the Uralic peoples. In addition, the Kets are linguistically probable descendants of WSHG, at least genetics shows the absence of other sources of this language. In the Kama river were originally present culture of Comb ceramics (Garino-Bor), a component of which is present only among the Sami and Balto-Finns, but not among any other Uralic peoples, and the peoples of Comb ceramics also spoke not in the Uralic languages, but in Dené-Caucasian languages as shown by hydronyms in Russia and the Paleo-Laplandic language, so the homeland of the Uralic peoples there is doubtful.

@Nullius_in_verba

11 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps You have been clear, thanks for explaination

@fanstargateiloveuniverse

10 ай бұрын

If you put the Uralic homeland to very north Asia, how can you explain loanwords from proto indo European before 2000 BC, and how can they use animal husbandry and small farming in the taiga/tundra where the climate is freezing. There should be words for animal and stuffs for that climate as an Eskimo has. Choosing a genetic ancestry which is reaching 90% in a tribe that is living far away from the proto European loanwords is very risky and wrong. It is true for the Ket/Yenisei people too. They have 90% Q haplogroup but they are connected to the Na-Dene people and/or to the Chinese people (C haplogroup and O haplogroup). Please consider population bottlenecks and founding fathers and changing languages, because they are the real answers for some problems. There isn’t any dene-Caucasian or any other macro groups, yet. MOST of the Uralic linguists locate the proto Uralic urheimat to the Kama river before 2000 BC. And there is almost no y-haplogroup N in that time in Europe. I know that the last source you used from Hungary they said that the Hungarian conquerers common people in the lowest level of the hierarchy has some N haplogroup and they said something about it, but please use the source of the linguists FIRST and the archaeologists and archegeneticists SECOND. There is no connection between Uralic and Turkic languages nor any other Asian languages.

@Nullius_in_verba

10 ай бұрын

@@fanstargateiloveuniverse Agreed, for what I know about genetics, its almost sure that Uralians people are born in the EHG ancestry cluster in Eastern Europe, or West Siberia

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

@@fanstargateiloveuniverse My map shows, among other things, the time and the sequence of divergense in the languages of the Uralic peoples. Linguistics shows that the Somoyedic languages are the most ancient branch of the Uralic languages, and the Samoyedic languages are located in the most northeastern area of the Uralic languages in the most difficult climatic conditions. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uralic_languages#Honkola,_et_al._(2013) There are also suggestions that the Yukaghir language has some connection with Proto-Uralic. By the way, the Turks during the time of the Proto-Uralians lived at best only somewhere in Mongolia. Proto-Indo-European borrowings from Proto-Uralians may well come from the West Siberian hunter-gatherers (WSHG), of which even the Nganasans have an admixture as shown in your favorite chart in my community. Animal husbandry appeared among the northern Uralic peoples quite late, at the turn of the era, apparently from the Iranian or Turkic nomads or from the Tungus. Agriculture did come to them from the Russians. I prefer not to use Y-chromosomes due to their imprecision, but to use genetic PCA. www.researchgate.net/publication/329218949/figure/fig3/AS:958954779717633@1605644044375/PCA-and-ADMIXTURE-analysis-a-PCA-plot-of-113-Modern-Eurasian-populations-with.png And it is not enough to talk here about the small number of people that belonged to the source of the Uralic language, as I am ready to remind you who brought the Indo-European language to modern Indians. The same pastoralists of the Hungarian conquerors were an absolute minority in front of the agricultural local majority, and yet they now speak the Hungarian language.

More god tier videos that help me when I need them.

YAY! a new video!

Instead of monotonous, bloated Russia, there could be a bunch of equal Finno-Ugric republics in the huge Ural Union or Confederation, and also separate Caucasian and Turkic countries. There would be enormous diversity, some of which has already been lost forever. RIP 😢

You started the spread of proto-Uralians way too far north, in my opinion. Genetic and archeological studies seem to show that the ancestors of proto-Uralians came from the south, from around Manchuria. (And they seem to have come to Manchuria from Southeast Asia, but that is much further back.) Also, the proto-Uralics probably ranged significantly farther south when they spread west too, as more southern regions would have been much more habitable. Probably the proto-Uralics once ranged south all the way to the Eurasian Steppe, but stayed in the forest regions to the north of it (aside from proto-Hungarians who later joined the Turkic steppe nomads in their lifestyle). Thus, your placing of proto-Finnic people to the north of proto-Ugric people and showing them spreading west in the very north of Eurasia seems quite wrong. The Uralic people probably spread west by the southern route, and then the Ural mountain range and other peoples inhabiting the Eurasian Steppe to the south split the Uralians in two, producing the Finno-Permians in the west and the Ugrics in the east of the Urals.

@The_Geographer_Maps

9 ай бұрын

An older history of the Proto-Uralians than in the video is not exactly known, and it is quite likely that the people who came out of Manchuria were also the ancestors of both the Yukagirs and probably other language families. The descendants of the proto-Uralians are the Proto-Finno-Ugrians and the Proto-Samoyeds, and then the Proto-Finno-Ugrians are divided into Proto-Finno-Permians and Proto-Ugrians. So it is likely that the Proto-Uralians were located east of the Urals. You are using a theory that does not include PCA genetic data. According to genetics, Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) related West Siberian Hunter-Gatherers (WSHG) originally lived in western Siberia. However, their genome is present with the genome associated with the Nganasans and makes up 1/3, and is present in all Finno-Ugric peoples, so if they spread from western Siberia, then only with the newly arrived Nganasan related genome. Initially, to the west of the Urals except for the tundra, lived people genetically almost identical to the Corded Ware without any admixture from the Comb ceramics culture, and were the most related to the Mordvins of all Finno-Permians and were probably Indo-Europeans. Article: Genetic ancestry changes in Stone to Bronze Age transition in the East European plain The change in the genome occurred with the penetration of the Nganasan component with an admixture from WSHG. It was then that the Finno-Permic languages probably penetrated there. Genetics shows that both the Finno-Saami and the Finns of the Volga-Oka, unlike the rest of the Finno-Permians, had an admixture from Comb ceramics culture, apparently geneticaly identical to the Kola BA, unlike the rest of the Finno-Permians, which indicates the distribution of the Finno-Saami and the Finns of the Volgo-Oka from the tundra of Europe, and if they came from there, then their relatives, the rest of the Finno-Permians, also came from there. Article: Genetic admixture and language shift in the medieval Volga-Oka interfluve

@clashslasher448

8 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Mapshey, next Time make Germanic peoples!!! 🔥🔥🔥 +1 like & sub

@VictorLdVS

11 күн бұрын

You are confusing/mixing haplogroup N with the Uralic ethno-linguistic group

@hyhhy

10 күн бұрын

@@VictorLdVS Are you saying the haplogroup N people, whose modern descendants are highly associated with Uralic speakers, did not bring proto-Uralic (or its unknown ancestor language) to Europe/ Western Eurasia?

Excited will be fun

Very nice next history of semetic peoples/percentage of proto-semetic ancestry every year

Could you release a video overlapping your Uralic, Turkic, and Indo-European videos? I'd love to see how the migrations interact.

I love this video. Incredible, informative graphic on the history of these beautiful cultures with music to match. It doesn't get much better than this 🤍

Please do austronesian and/or austroasiatic next if you could 🙏🙏

Can you do history of italic, celtic and germanic peoples?

Very nice video!

Great video, i have two small complaints 1) Hungarian‘s historical range included the entire carpathian basin after our migration to it in 895. The image you used shows modern distribution, which is significantly reduced from historical distribution, due to factors i will discuss in the next point 2) From very early on, you showed Hungarian as having 0% Uralic DNA, which also doesn’t track with reality. Studies have shown that up until the turkish invasion in the 1400-1500s, when the country became a constant battleground for hundreds of years, Hungarians had a plurality of Uralic DNA. The conscription by both sides, raiding and looting, and the consequent depopulation, followed by german/austrian colonialism and the bringing-in of foreign settlers (croatians in burgenland, czechs in the northern carpathians, serbs in vojvodina, etc. lead to the hungarian DNA becoming much more ‚european‘. If you ever make a future version, i hope you can fix these errors. Greetings from Hungary!

@nsk370

4 ай бұрын

Even Szekely Hungarians only have something like 5-10% Ugric ancestry, i severely doubt it was much different in Hungary.

@milantoth6246

4 ай бұрын

@@nsk370 a lot changed in the over the last 1000 years. It was indeed different back then.

4:10 the chud peoples💀

@xnjbthqgpzn4oc.xnp1aojspwb53

11 ай бұрын

IT’S SO FUCKING OVER

@theuniverse5173

11 ай бұрын

It's begun

@siyacer

2 ай бұрын

vs Chad chadians

The most recent studies say that proto uralic was spoken in southern and central siberia not north siberia

Very interesting video, because I call myself as a linguist for two reasons, 1. I know many languages (Finnish (Uralic language) is my native language), and 2. I study languages, especially their relations with other foreign languages.

What are the Sum, Yem and Chud peoples that can be seen in Finland at 4:24 ? Never heard of them and can't find anything on Google

@user-ce6iy2nw5o

3 ай бұрын

Sum is russian for suomi and yem for häme. Weird choice since there are english names for these

@jokemon9547

2 ай бұрын

Sum and Yem are Finnish tribes described in the Novgorod chronicles and their wars with them in the 11th/12th/13th centuries. Chud on the other hand is the term used by Slavic speakers to refer to Baltic Finnic groups, but it eventually went on to mean Finnic people in a specific area.

Not correctly though because Proto-Finnic already exists over 4000+ years

interesting

Many inaccuracies in the maps of supposed ancestry

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

Which for example?

Could you do a video on the European colonization of the Americas?

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

I will have to if I make maps of the history of the peoples of Western Europe

@ganglosaxon1488

10 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_MapsIMO, as an American instead of using terms like “German-American” I would use terms like “Midwestern White American”, or Appalachian White American, Black American, New England White American

@vivianeden9529

Ай бұрын

@@ganglosaxon1488 that makes zero sense in terms of genetics and ancestry, though

It seems the author forgot that Hungarians pretty long time lived just near and partly at the Caucasus..

@The_Geographer_Maps

2 ай бұрын

Where do you get this data from?

@koppanygyorgy2085

2 ай бұрын

Savard Hungary had literal remnants of Hungarians in that region. Not to mention the many mentions of Levédia.@@The_Geographer_Maps

@StrangerSpace

2 ай бұрын

I use common historical sources as well as just logic. Mentions of Levedia as a place and of the Hungarian migration are at least in "De Administrando Imperio" by Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus, X century.. I really didn't study well the archeological sources on this subject, but if there are lack of them, I believe it is because of a little interest in them.. And it also comes from the fact that Alans(hun. Jasz) were tribe that migrated with Hungarians. And Alans are inhabitants of areas near and in Caucasus. So, they could make a stable union with them only interacting closely.. The same could be said about Avars. I also forgot to mention that this migration to Balkans is also described in Kievan Rus' "letopis", so it's really good documented..

But according to Professor Mario Alinei and Michelangelo Naddeo, they originated in Europe and spread eastwards across the steppe, from where they influenced the small peoples of the north. However, the Yamnaya culture population does indeed have a North Asian gene (ANE).

Interestingly, the Russians with partial Uralic ancestry shown here could've been called Pomors, who were the sailers and other merchants who settled the north.

Any idea why Proto-Uralic and Proto-Dravidian number four is identical? Can it be mere coincidence?

@eestimarksist

8 ай бұрын

It is a coincidence lol and even if it were to be real we wouldnt know since the common denominator would have to be over 10 thousand years ago meaning we have no actual way of testing its validity regardless.

I wish they had gone somewhere warmer.

The Hungarians still have Uralic ancestry tho…

@Akurvafiad

2 ай бұрын

​@@AttilaRozsahegyi Azok a Hunok, de mi Magyarok egy külön nép vagyunk. De annyiban igazad van hogy a Magyaroknak több török genetikai maradványa van mint a Finn-Ugor, de csak azért mert a Hunok későbbi nemzedékei már a Kárpát medencében voltak amikor megérkeztek a Ugor Magyarok és utána az ottani népek öszekeveredtek az Onogur többségel, vagyis az azért van. De te mit gondolsz?

I think the Sami language spread from the south-east as a lingua franca for trade, but I don't think it was a migration of people. Rather the ancestors of the Sami were halfway south into Sweden already when the ice started melting inland, not in the 17th century as the map shows.

@Enleuk

11 ай бұрын

Although, I suppose the "proto-uralic genes" could have reached that indigenous population like how your map shows.

@The_Geographer_Maps

11 ай бұрын

In Scandinavia, the ice melted in 7000 BC, then the race for Scandinavia began between EHG from the east and WHG from the south of Scandinavia. This gave rise to SHG standing between EHG and WHG. Later, Comb ceramics people settled in northern Scandinavia. Apparently they brought the Paleo-Laplandic language. in the Bronze Age, people of East Eurasian origin who spoke Uralic languages reached Scandinavia. This created a population of Bolshoy Oleni Ostrov who stood between the Comb ceramics people and the East Eurasians, although they still spoke Paleo-Laplandic. The Uralic people also reached southern Finland and created the Proto-Saami language. They were genetically identical to modern Eastern Finns. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pre-Finno-Ugric.png In 400 CE, the proto-Sámi began to move north, assimilating the Paleo-Laplanders. This created a Saami of northern scandinavia, with a peak of Paleo-Laplandic ancestry in the Saami of northern Finland. www.researchgate.net/publication/329218949/figure/fig3/AS:958954779717633@1605644044375/PCA-and-ADMIXTURE-analysis-a-PCA-plot-of-113-Modern-Eurasian-populations-with.png Since apparently the Swedes and Norwegians are genetically related to the Eastern Finns than to the modern Sami, it can be assumed that initially the Sami of Sweden and Norway were geneticaly identical to the modern Eastern Finns. i.imgur.com/bYBQ9cy.png Presumably in the 16th century, the Finnish Sami began to settle mainland Sweden and Norway, spreading an increased Paleo-Laplandic ancestry.

@mky3039

10 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps your assumption about the Saami are wrong, the levänluhta samples make this clear, being practically identical to modern Saami people.

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

@@mky3039 It's hard to explain without a PCA lineup, but Levanluhta, unlike the Saami, has less hunter-gatherer ancestry, and stand in a wedge from Bolshoy Oleni Ostrov not to the Eastern Finns like the Saami, but to the Eastern Slavs. In other respects, geneticaly, a similar wedge went from the Eastern Finns to the Eastern Slavs in Ingria and Estonia of the same time. i.imgur.com/juVS3BN.png compvar-workshop.readthedocs.io/en/latest/_images/pcaAllEurasia.png

@mky3039

10 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps If you have an instagram or something where we could send each other pictures it would be much easier to discuss this.

Hungaryans 👁️👄👁️

@papazataklaattiranimam

10 ай бұрын

@@hplusplus9850 sen kimlerdensin

@papazataklaattiranimam

10 ай бұрын

@@hplusplus9850 şintok ırkı🐸

@papazataklaattiranimam

10 ай бұрын

@@hplusplus9850 tokatlı canavar mıydı neydi o musun

@dorkinsful

3 ай бұрын

@Jaswolfy you're replying to turks tho

Nice video as always Do video about semitic people

@ghoucheKalar

7 ай бұрын

Allahu Akbar

In any case, none of these languages developed in Mainland Europe. Despite the fact that the Finns and Saami have always bordered Europe and Asia both. Which is why they're considered European, but their language does not develop in European mainland.

Can you make a video about germanic spread and their ancestrality

Very good video would be cool with Germans

Haven't northern Swedes and Norwegians Sami admixture?

@The_Geographer_Maps

11 ай бұрын

Yes, they have an Saami admixture, but they have less than 5% of Proto-Uralic ancestry, and the map does not show non-Uralic peoples with have less than 5% of Proto-Uralic ancestry. This is also why central and southern Russians are not shown.

l am nenets

@The_Geographer_Maps

5 ай бұрын

Ого, а я Русский. А ты оленевод?

Lmao Hungary got whitewashed ToT

You should use a different editing program, the frames are almost always blurred.

arent the proto uralians placed too far in the north?

Do semitic people

Russians since 1215 CE? Any doc proof? Certainly not in use such a word as russians in that area at that time ..

@vulc1

3 ай бұрын

Yeah it is strange that he kept the "Aesti" for Estonians for such a long time on the map but then put "Russians" right away as if that word was used at the time (it was not).

@Echinacea_purpurea

2 ай бұрын

Rusʼ = Ukraine

@Echinacea_purpurea

2 ай бұрын

Русь (Росия) всегда была связана с Украиной и украинцами, а не с финно-уграми. Лишь в 18 веке название Россия стало употребляться и для Московии, где коренное население было финно-угорским. Так появилось название "великоросы", а в 20 веке его заменило "русские". "Россияне" - термин, придуманный Ельциным с образованием Рф.

Hungarian map is wrong. Territory of it has been made smaller just during last century.

That's a very unusual location for a culture to spawn.

@gamesyeti4292

8 ай бұрын

Then go back like 5000 years and tell them

@ipoop4timesaday

8 ай бұрын

​@@gamesyeti4292no

@user-ce6iy2nw5o

3 ай бұрын

Its not even close to the actual location

А чья ДНК преобладает у Финнов?

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

У меня на канале в сообществе показываются народы ассимилированные Прауральцами. Можете посмотреть. Доминирующей ДНК у Финнов является происходящей от Индоевропейской культуры Текстильной керамики раскинутой с раннего бронзового века по всему восточному берегу Балтийского моря. Её генетическими потомками являются Прибалты и Балто-Финны. Именно они имеют самый высокий процент происхождения от европейских мезолитических охотников-собирателей. Если мы копнём глубже, то западных Финнов можно смоделировать состоящими на 38% от Праиндоевропейцев Ямной культуры, 1% от Древних Северных Евразийцев, 20% Восточно-Европейских охотников-собирателей, 18% Западно-Европейских охотников-собирателей, 16% Раннеевропейских земледельцев, 2% Кавказских охотников-собирателей и на 5% от Прауральцев.

@StrangerSpace

3 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps А сколько финнов взяли для исследования, 10 и все из Санкт-Петербурга? Всё равно результат будет N. ))) У финнов преобладающая гаплогруппа N, индоевропейцы здесь ни при чём, или они что, сразу со всех направлений мигрировали, с севера, юга, востока? ))

yeniseians and sakhas can also be included

Chud was a name used only by Russians and for all Finnic peoples. The Aesti were Baltic, not Finnic/Uralic.

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

The first exact name of the Estonians was the Russian name "Chud" to which the ancestors of the Votians also belonged, but only they were called by that name. The names of the peoples Sum, Yem and Ves also come from the Russian chronicles and they are not called Chud. There was also the Chud Zavolochskaya people, but in the annals where the name Chud comes from, Chud and Chud Zavolochskaya are called as different peoples. It is likely that Votians and Estonians were still one people in those days. No other names of Estonians of those times are known, therefore the name "Chud" is used. "Aesti" was also an egzonym known from the Romans and apparently belonged to the Balts, but the Germans who came to the Baltics during the Crusades redirected this name to the Estonians.

@StrangerSpace

3 ай бұрын

True, but they also called the Finno-Ugrians as "Chud beloglazaya" (white-eyed Chud) because of the light eyes of most Finno-Ugrians (espeially Finno group). It is true notice about eyes color till today!.. Most Finno-Ugrians of Volga-Urals have gray or alike color or green eyes.

why estonians and finns so little uralic ancestry? that cant be true. wouldnt that mean that we finnics then arent actually descended from proto uralics at all

@dasarath5779

8 ай бұрын

@TheLuthum finnic are uralic. you mean samoyedic and finno ugric. and yeah i would expect that whole thing with scandinavians intermixing, but finns maintained alot of dna

@user-ce6iy2nw5o

3 ай бұрын

Because the reference population is ngasans who are siperian and nobody close to actual proto-uralics

@yaafromFinland

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-ce6iy2nw5owhat population should be used?

complete bullshit

Shit, propaganda. All those goes west much earlier.

Turkic C dna haploupgroup please. Liaoning

@The_Geographer_Maps

10 ай бұрын

I am not making a map about the distribution of haplogroup C, but I am making a map about the distribution of the Proto-Turkic genome in percentage of ancestry.

@papazataklaattiranimam

10 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps Do you include Mongolian, Buryat, Tajik, Oirat, Adyghe, Kabardin, Abkhaz etc., who have around 20-60% medieval Turkic blood , although they are not Turkic.

@papazataklaattiranimam

10 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps Also, the Proto-Turks formed in the Altai Mountains and Mongolia around 3000 BC. What culture or population did you use for the Proto-Turkic?

@The_Geographer_Maps

9 ай бұрын

@@papazataklaattiranimam Of course, already did! Although I’m not sure about the Abkhaz and Adyghe

@papazataklaattiranimam

9 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps They have like 15% Turkic blood due to settlements of Turkic tribes in Caucasus like Cumans and Kipchaks

I have seen sources putting the uralic homeland near the sayan mountains in the russian mongolia border region. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayan_Mountains

@The_Geographer_Maps

11 ай бұрын

The Uralic peoples, and especially the Nganasans, have a unique Siberian East Eurasian origin. The ancient and modern peoples of the Sayans and Baikal, and even the American Indians, have an additional East Asian ancestry to the Siberian, unlike the Uralic peoples i.imgur.com/l9HRGm5.jpeg www.researchgate.net/publication/329218949/figure/fig3/AS:958954779717633@1605644044375/PCA-and-ADMIXTURE-analysis-a-PCA-plot-of-113-Modern-Eurasian-populations-with.png This suggests that the Proto-Uralians are the descendants of the first Eastern Eurasians who settled Siberia after the last glacial maximum.

@aiuvozu

7 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps Are they related to the Ancient Paleo-Siberian, or the Neo-Siberians?

@dorkinsful

3 ай бұрын

@@The_Geographer_Maps why would it suggest that, moron? Indo-europeans having BMAC admixture suggests that the indeo-european homeland was neolithic Iran?