Well done! Interestingly, small groups of them, such as Jurche and Manchu, dominated populous China.

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

I waited for this video for a long time. Thank you

Such a young language family, compared to indo-european (originated ~4000BC) or afroasiatic (~10000BC), and yet it is dying so fast. How sad.

Great video! Missed these map ones!

@atbing2425

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you

how far do we go back !

RIP

Even and Evenki got assimilated by Turkic Yakuts

This video is very accurate comepared to your other videos.(I think you half-copied the dragon historian's video... but it is still great!)I belive you will reuplode the unaccurate videos like the koreanic-japonic(this is base on the altaic theory which neary every linguists tell it wrong. I hope you can change it to modern theorys which make koreanic and japonic differant languages. Also, some ancient korean languages are not shown.), afroasiatic(this tells afroasiatic based on levant but actually most linguists agree afroasiatic languases are based near ethiopia. Also many languages aren-t shown.), and sino-tibetic(most linguists agree that sino tibetic started much more east than what came in the video. Also the dialects of Chinese isn-t shown well)Also, I hope you will make your mapping skills better. It looks a little dirty to much people. Still, this video is very great! I will belive that you will make videos better and more accurate.

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you

약 5000년 전에 만주, 연해주에는 부계 C2b 유전자 비율이 높은 민족이 있었던 것 같고, 약 5000년 전에 내몽골~요동 지방에는 부계 C2c 유전자 비율이 높은 민족이 있었던 것 같습니다. 부계 C2b F1756 유전자 비율이 높은 것으로 생각되는 선비족이 북위, 북조, 수나라, 당나라를 건국하는데 기여한 것 같고, 부계 C2b M401 유전자 비율이 높은 세력이 청나라를 건국하는데 기여한 것 같습니다. 부계 C2c Cts3385 유전자 비율이 높은 세력이 섬서성 석묘(Shimao) 유적을 만드는 데 기여한 것 같고, 부계 C2c F1319 유전자 비율이 높은 세력이 상나라(Shang dynasty)를 건국하는데 기여한 것 같으며, 부계 C2c Cts2657 유전자 비율이 높은 세력이 북부여, 고구려를 건국하는데 기여한 것 같습니다. 원나라를 건국한 것으로 생각되는 몽골족은 부계 C2b 유전자 비율과 C2c 유전자 비율이 모두 높은 것 같습니다.

👍👍👍👍

can you also do history of Turkic languages?

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

Yes I might in the future, for now this is a good video kzread.info/dash/bejne/foBrpLWQZKa6Xag.html

@Raidon8537

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 Yes, I've seen that video before. But everyone do ''history of Turkic languages'' differently. For example, in this video, he shows the distribution of Turkic languages differently and more incorrectly: kzread.info/dash/bejne/kYd3pcuJkc_FaKQ.html I personally believe that Turkic languages ​​come from Southern Manchuria.

@atbing2425

2 жыл бұрын

@@Raidon8537 I see

@Raidon8537

2 жыл бұрын

@@atbing2425 I definitely think that the "history of Turkic languages" video is more difficult than the history of other languages videos. If you can the video, I recommend you to have a look at these links: 1-en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkic_languages 2- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Turkic_language 3- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Turkic 4- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Uyghur 5- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Yugur_language