The God Solution - Calling Atheists to Islam - Sheikh McCarthy & John Fontain | Young Smirks EP99

Ойын-сауық

Support today: / mrjohnfontain
www.gofundme.com/youngsmirks
Sign up for the mailing list for future courses : mailchi.mp/28920ef0eb56/famil...

Пікірлер: 55

  • @QuestionMark_119
    @QuestionMark_1192 жыл бұрын

    Alhamdulillah , thank you brothers

  • @7xez
    @7xez2 жыл бұрын

    jazakom Allahu khayra brothers , love you both and all Muslims for the sake of Allah

  • @aqraja123
    @aqraja1232 жыл бұрын

    AOA brothers, could anyone please advise the name of the Qari reciting Quran in the start of the video. JazakAllah khair!

  • @saidahmed7411

    @saidahmed7411

    2 жыл бұрын

    Sh. Okasha kamany

  • @aqraja123

    @aqraja123

    2 жыл бұрын

    JazakAllah khair - Thank you so much brother Said!!!

  • @theoskeptomai2535
    @theoskeptomai25352 жыл бұрын

    Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgement as to the existence of gods until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. My position is that *_I have no good reason to acknowledge the existence of any god._* And here is the evidence I must consider when evaluating the claim by theists, and as to why I currently hold to such a position. 1. I personally have never observed a god. 2. I have never encountered a person whom has claimed to have observed a god. 3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity. 4. I have never been presented a valid logical argument which also employed sound premises that lead deductively to a conclusion that a god(s) exists. 5. Of the nearly 50 logical syllogisms I have encountered arguing for the existence of a god(s), I have found all to contain multiple fallacies or unsubstantiated premises. 6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation as to the causation of that phenomenon. 7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered the _vice versa._ 8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event. 9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed appears to have *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity. 10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction, or do not present as falsifiable. ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the existence of a god. I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding any acknowledgement until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstatiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._* I welcome any cordial response. Peace.

  • @Al-Bruni

    @Al-Bruni

    2 жыл бұрын

    Peace. Have you ever read the Qur'an? If not, why? Look for the answers in the Qur'an, with an open mind.

  • @theoskeptomai2535

    @theoskeptomai2535

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@Al-Bruni Yes. I have read the Qu'ran but it was 35+ years ago.

  • @mohammedasmal2549

    @mohammedasmal2549

    2 жыл бұрын

    “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” ~ Arthur Conan Doyle ( ironically, a militant atheist, btw ) the logical proof of the existence of a Creator , is the absence of any other acceptable explanation Evolution theory fails to comply with all basic sciences: the math of probabilities makes life by accident impossible 1 in 20 to the power 300 for an average protein to form entirely by accident DNA is billions of molecules all arranged perfectly to code life - ?all accidentally it fails at the second law of thermodynamics - a physics law written in stone evolution by natural selection is impossible as it implies the the genotype for all species pre-exists in the genome and is selected out by natural factors = fails biology there are many other fatal flaws in the evolution theory - read Harun Yahya www.muslim-library.com/dl/books/English_THE_EVOLUTION_DECEIT.pdf many well researched christian authors also make the same argument the big bang is an ex nihilo event - everything comes from a singularity evolutionism does not explain how did the singularity come into being? ex nihilo

  • @Bbb82744

    @Bbb82744

    2 жыл бұрын

    The type of evidence u think you need, is not what u need.

  • @AliA-tt2lc

    @AliA-tt2lc

    2 жыл бұрын

    do u believe in the concept of soul? of respect? of consciousness? can u observe these? they arent observed by materialistic means and so it is with god. if there's no god how do u explain the creation of the universe and humans everything has a creator, nothing comes from null, and the universe and humans (the most complicated things) also must have a creator

Келесі