It's broken down and simplified giving the viewer gather basic understanding of TOC, it's a vast subject with countless other elements and would take time to master, thanks for sharing.

concepts worth learning and executing.

very well explained

I'm currently reading the book. It seems that Al and all of the managers/heads don't really know what they're producing and why. It reminds me of the movie Back To School with Rodney Dangerfield where he schools the business professor on how business works in the real world. Rodney's character asks the professor what product the fictional plant is manufacturing and the professor says tape recorders. Rodney's character says, "Tape recorders? The Japs will kill us!" Any organization has to start with the fundamental question of what good or service it's providing then ask why it's providing that good or service. Al's company doesn't seem to know why it's in business in the first place.

Where can i see the whole movie??? All i have found is one with Spanish dub in 144p quality.... and i wont be paying 100$ USD to only been able to see the movie once... Even the DVD costs 999$ its crazy!!!!!!!!!!

I wish they would release the full movie for free for us it watch. The movie is over 30 years old now.

PRS sir supremacy 😉

What is the title of the movie ?

Wonderful 😂

slow the pace, but keep it consistent

@LearningTOC

2 жыл бұрын

Another concept shown in the movie: balance flow, not capacity. The rate at which the system performs is the rate at which the constraint is maximized.

The entire system slows to match the slowest person or machine

@LearningTOC

2 жыл бұрын

The entire system is subordinated (one of the "five focusing steps" shown in the movie) to the "entity" that determines the systems output. Maximizing the output of any other "entity" (contrary to subordination) yields to jeopardizing the output of the entire system.

They have to walk 5 miles. After 2 miles and 100 yards they decide to have Herbie in front. Then they walk some before they take lighten his backpack. And they the last 4 miles went quicker.. I believe that the problem is that Mr. Rogo is bad at math 🤣 Also if three machine produce 10 items per hour on a conveyor belt, the last machine will be idle for 12 minutes before the first produced item of the first machine reaches it. This concept has an issue with basic math.

@doctormoobbc

Жыл бұрын

It would only be idle for 12 minutes once. Not 12 minutes every hour, so the idle time in this situation isn't an issue because if you keep the flow consistent from that point forward then you will be producing reliably every hour.

@alexlindbjerg8283

Жыл бұрын

​@@doctormoobbc The production cycle will begin with 1 unit of idle time for the second machine and 2 units for the third machine. The first machine ends the production cycle with 2 units of idle time, the second machine with 1 unit of time. The production cycle will have constant of 6 units of idle time. Identififying the constants is what underpins the reliablity. The idle time of starting and stopping the production will be a constant. And to think that the production will move forward unhindered in perpetuity is a recipe for disaster.

@LearningTOC

Жыл бұрын

Thank you for sharing your thinking on the matter. Well, you are ignoring reality where variability exists (uneven path, Herbies, etc). Henry Ford resolved (kind of) the variability problem by putting severe limitations: inventing the conveyor belt AND stating that the customer can have any color he wishes as long as it is black.... The Goal Movie gives you a comprehensive understanding of what is needed to maximize throughput where dependency and variability coexist.

@alexlindbjerg8283

Жыл бұрын

@@LearningTOC I never read the section in The Princpiles of Sceintific Management where Frederick Taylor explained how 4+2=5. But hey, please point to the section where he disproves basic math and I will carry the torch for you and him..

@camil2007

11 ай бұрын

Las matemáticas son ciencias exactas. Pero no son las matemáticas qué trabajan con personas ni con máquinas, por eso 2 personas + 2 personas haciendo algo puede ser 3 o 4 o 5 en entrega de resultados o quien sabe.....

ok so Israeli accents are German now... (i mean its true if your Yiddish but thats some of the times)