Super interesting seeing the mica gameplay. I’ve been grinding and using the aim-120 on the F-16, F-15, and harrier. And the missile performs more like a spear that throws itself straight, fast, and long. The Mica seems to perform more like a boomerang. Short range, wobbly, but holy shit does it turn hard.

@zacharymarino8926

6 сағат бұрын

From my understanding, the MICA is most effective when you pretend it's an AIM-9X, but at longer ranges it's rather lackluster. With this in mind, I'll take an AMRAAM over a MICA any day of the week

why you fired a MICA-EM at 35/50km on the deck? AMRAAMs barely hit anything at 40km at 10,000m a MICA is not even going to reach the target at 35 or 50km considering it bleeds energy quickly and you aren't guiding the missile through TWS

@glitchhacker300

8 күн бұрын

Why does TWS have anything to do with it?

@acdfg3

8 күн бұрын

@@glitchhacker300 he didn't use TWS to guide the missile

@giovannijr.tortia7594

7 күн бұрын

I consistenly hit with amraams from like 50km at 10000m, and even when i don't hit i still force the opponent to go defensive

First two missiles literally fired outside the max range, they would literally never hit even if the target didn't maneuver

@Alextz_Gr

7 сағат бұрын

and he is holding the lock on many of the other targets like its a SARh missile instead of firing and quickly notching.

I reckon on the deck micas max range would be about 25km 40 to 50 is way too far

This is Brazil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

BRAZIL MENTIONED 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷

Russia has something similar. The r77

god straight up the worst thing theyve ever added to the game

@notmyrealaccount5245

8 күн бұрын

The same stale gameplay with new killing weapons which basically could make us kill from kilometers away.... they really should get new game mission designer

@arend463

8 күн бұрын

@@notmyrealaccount5245 changed from launching missiles from

@notmyrealaccount5245

8 күн бұрын

@@arend463 don't get me wrong... new addition is good to the game as warthunder centered around realistic military vehicles simulation and more modern vehicles added is crucial for the game continuation. The objectives is lackluster I mean gaijin basically using the same objectives and the same gameplay for ARB since 1.0. As one of warthunder veteran it's damn stale and now they're adding ARH which makes the player have no chance to complete their objectives especially when bombing bases, killing ai etc.... adding more objectives than 4 bases could potentially solve that. I mean now it's 16v16 and more bases could be a good QoL update and also with multipathing lowered, the stock grind gonna be hell for stock top tier. Seriously, what the hell gaijin game mission designer is cooking. The arb gameplay should be different for low, middle and top tier

@arend463

8 күн бұрын

@@notmyrealaccount5245 ahh yes realistic militaries send 16 aircraft to fight 16 enemy aircraft with so electronic warfare. They also send their tanks to dual other tanks from

@arend463

8 күн бұрын

@@notmyrealaccount5245 but yeah i do agree that the game designer needs to be fired.

Can someone buy me a pack 50% off?

Skill issue