Какое счастье, что Ютюб отключил рекламу в России. Теперь все ролики можно смотреть без рекламы и бесплатно, это так прекрасно. Привет Евросоюзу😀

@giuseppedp7055

Жыл бұрын

Se sei russo di a Putin di finire la guerra, che sta ammazzando molta gente innocente che non erano nemici della Russia, ma fratelli. Gli ucraini non vi hanno aggrediti. Basta guerra, divertitevi, non andate a morire per Putin. Ora divulgate questo messaggio. Noi europei vogliamo bene ai russi come agli ucraini.

@user-lb1ht3uk2v

Жыл бұрын

@@giuseppedp7055 Anche i russi amano i comuni abitanti d'Europa. Ma mi dispiace che la maggior parte di loro non abbia mai capito la causa del conflitto. Se i tuoi supervisori fossero più intelligenti e lungimiranti, allora non sarebbe successo.

I saved the video to my hard drive, I have an application on my computer that can turn such files into electricity.

Excelente video muy bien explicado..gracias

Masters of illusion. Very entertaining, but as real as time travel on the Orient Express. Without going into detail about all of the technical issues, the one that should stand out like a drum roll, is the lack of change in RPM of the motor, or change in sound, when the generator is placed under load when the grinder stops and starts.

Красава чувак, хоть бы для приличия подождал немного, пока газик попадет во впуск, а потом запускал. Я делал из нержи подобную хрень. Лично собирал, там рабочая площадь гораздо больше была, и жрет ток она как не в себя, при этом даже напрямую поджечь не мог то, что выделялось, не говоря о запуске на этом двигателя. Потому что КПД околонулевой, даже опустив тот момент, что источник питания будет неисчерпаемым. И рабочее напряжение было у меня было не 12В, а 30В. Хоть бы какую лабуду на 555 собрал для виду.

@ГнедойАлексёв

Жыл бұрын

Так это же классика - кто-то таким для развлечения (и для самообразования) занимается, и заодно лохов потроллить. Кто-то и заработать ухитряется - на тех же лохах. До сих пор есть люди, которые думают, что вот сейчас, еще немного поперекладываю магниты, да еще вместо "обычного" возьму супернеодимовый (как будто есть принципиальная разница), и всё заработает - вот же, в видосиках работает!

Usually, I don't comment on technical matters on KZread as I consider it to be a realm of entertainment, and not for scientific debate. However, the video begs for comments. I watched it and it was great, and I found it very entertaining. The craftsmanship of the video was also great. Some of the comments made by viewers ridiculed the author and others, although some did understand the difficulty involved. However, I seriously feel that many of these types of videos exist and are extremely misleading on various levels, such as science, engineering, and the message they convey regarding energy stakeholders. These videos often imply that “one day we will not need energy source owned by the rich people”, well I may understand the frustration, but that message is totally wrong. Although one aspect of the video worked, which was the electrolysis that produced hydrogen and oxygen; the motor did run and the electrical generator produced electricity, there is no doubt that the author should be thanked for that part. However, the whole system will not work as independent energy source, and I will explain why. The overall bottom line is negative; you cannot produce energy from this machine. The system produced hydrogen by water decomposition using the energy from the charged battery. Running the motor-generator will produce electricity to run the electric grinder and charge the battery. However, there is a loss at each part, and energy consumption occurs at each stage of the system. As time goes by, the recycled energy in the battery will not be sufficient, and at one point, the system will stop working. Integrated over time, at the start, the total energy (Etotal) is equal to the energy stored in the battery (Ebattery). While the system is working, we have Etotal = E (stored in the battery) + E (charging the battery) + W (work done = mechanical energy). However, because W is produced, the available energy is reduced over time. The bottom line is that the stored energy gets reduced (remember that only a small portion is recycled back into the battery). At the end, the battery will be totally discharged, and the system will stop. to guide the readers, I took some time to write this explanation, which is quite general and lacks details, I understand. You would need 2 pages to develop the energy balance over time. It is extremely misleading to claim that energy can be produced without the need for a primary energy source, such as hydrocarbons, hydropower, nuclear, renewable energy, humans or animals, other machine…. What is commonly referred to as "free energy" on the internet is entirely incorrect in both the designation and the concept. The scientific meaning of free energy is different from what is discussed on KZread. And to say that we can produce energy from a dead matter (such as water) is flatly wrong. It is unfortunate that so much misinformation is published on the internet, which distorts the knowledge and understanding of energy usage, energy sources,... Hope it will be useful for some.

@peterhandlovsky8479

Жыл бұрын

Your statement is good and logical, but I am not sure if you know that every power plant with a battery is technically built in such a way that the battery is constantly being recharged during the operation of the plant, i.e. it is still charged and therefore the energy pumped from the battery is automatically keeps adding.

@akaroui843

Жыл бұрын

@@peterhandlovsky8479 Question: from where "it keeps adding" ? There should be an energy source that is consumed to provide the utilized energy + all energy components lost (by frictions, heat, and other energy dissipation ways). The batteries you are talking about are always charged because the system is designed such that a portion of generated energy goes to these batteries. Keep in mind that THERE IS NO CREATION of energy from nothing / from vacuum. There must be always a primary source spent to cover all energy components used to run the system (mechanical, thermal, chemical, electrical,...).

genial! gracias por compartir tus conocimientos, saludos desde Argentina!

Buen trabajo, me gusto el triciculo que carga las piedras, es uste un jenio, lo feicito.

A lot of people will want to trash this - ignore them - I've never seen so many pop-up ads - must be on to something. A great deal of work has been done here - and given away freely. You just have to do more to make it work for you. The two next steps are; - connecting to a free (solar) electric supply and - experimenting with a.c. instead of d.c. (there will be resonant frequencies that shake water apart for very little effort. Unfortunately, it might be in the GHz range.) Just don't listen to the freemasons - they're just trying to bring you down.

its run perfectly.. if you dont use water but gasoline :)... thats why the ''hydroelectrolysisgenator'' is not transpoarent

Es un buen comienzo, para que otros desde su lugar de origen se interesen en la ciencia. Siempre se empieza con algo. Felicidades.

The most powerful informed and trustworthy people on the planet: Such an engine is simply not possible and will not work. Some random guy on KZread: You mean like the one I just made in my garage?

Estupendo trabajo, ¿podrías decirme si la chapa de inox es de 3mm? gracias.

Нужен ток в пару сотен ампер, чтоб производить необходимое количество газа для работы этого двигателя. То есть никакой экономии не получится, если заменять часть бензина водородом. При этом еще на полезную работу ничего не останется, не говоря о том, чтоб бензогенератор сам себя обеспечивал хотя бы.

Que Interesante. Muchas gracias.

Vídeo muito bem elaborado um grande tutorial Parabéns!

12 volt feszültséggel, egy lemez párral , 42 Khz frekvenciaával készítettem víz bontó készüléket . Minimális mennyiségű gáz keletkezett .

There is no way that amount of hydrogen is producing the kw/h to be running that engine like that on generated hydrogen.

Parabéns. Projeto inteligente.

HOW GENIUS YOU ARE IN VIDEO MAKING. YOUR VIDEO-MAKING SKILLS ARE ON ANOTHER LEVEL.

20 years ago I made an hho gen slightly smaller than this and put it on a 3.8ltr park ave, buick. The battery energizes the plates splitting the water into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas. both very combustible. When the car is started the engine charges the battery. I used the HHO as a gas supplement and my average city/hiway miles went from 22mpg to 28mpg. My average hiway mpg went from 22mpg to 32mpg. I included a DC voltage pot to control voltage and a pulse width modulator to pulse the energy across the plates so the gas would release faster. It was smaller than the generator here. I used distilled water and baking soda as the electrolyte. I should have made a bigger one. I became ill and had to shelve it. It was great fun.

@solucioneselectricasprofes

Жыл бұрын

Yo también antes jugaba mucho con estos generadores. Hay tantas cosas que se pueden rescatar y cuidar el medio ambiente si contas con más tecnología e infraestructura

@cosmefulanito5933

Жыл бұрын

@@solucioneselectricasprofes También se pueden hacer cosas que realmente sirvan y no perder tiempo en otras que la física del secundario nos explicó el por qué todas estas estupideces no sirven.

After running it. Remove the battery and allow it to provide its own energy to produce the hydrogen and then show me that it runs.

@GaryCoker-pm9sz

Жыл бұрын

Why u made my friend u about to loose all the money the power is going back to the people 😂😅😂😂 don't worry we will find u a job to do while we play golf for a change😂😅😂

me gustan tus videos, excelente trabajo...........

soy un interesado en estos temas y les felicito por la informacion

Muy sospechoso que las rpm del generador no cambien con carga. Que sea posible no quiere decir que sea viable ya que la batería es la que crea la electrolisis. El rendimiento neto es inferior a la carga de la batería y la herramienta

@toro5338

Жыл бұрын

Este es un comentario serio e inteligente 👍 KZread se detendrá con sus videos falsos y todos los tontos que creen en ellos (18'557 tontos)😅😆😆😅😂🤣

@serge9811

Жыл бұрын

c'est de l'eau sans plomb 95 ou 98 ?

@rubenscorreamoreira8891

Жыл бұрын

Não acho que seja sincero esse projeto eu fiz um bem parecido faz tempo, mas fazer funcionar o motor não fez.

For me, it's not enough to have a set of seemingly scientific props. As long as there are cuts in the video, as long as it is not possible to know what happened to the whole thing before it started, as long as it is not possible to see what is actually driving the engine, and as long as there is no explanation as to why the transparent cover of one of the cells suddenly changed, I will live with my suspicion that I am being taken for a fool. Számomra nem elég, ha van egy sor tudományosnak tűnő kellék. Amíg vágások vannak a videóban, amíg nem lehet tudni, hogy mi történt az egésszel az indulás előtt, amíg nem lehet látni, hogy valójában mi hajtja a motort, és amíg nincs magyarázat arra, hogy miért változott meg hirtelen az egyik cella átlátszó burkolata, addig együtt fogok élni a gyanúmmal, hogy hülyének néznek.

@gregperez363

Жыл бұрын

It is a fool not enough bubbles for make run this Engin it's simple mathematics

Very proud of you. Great job

Questa si'che e'una vera e bella invenzione! Complimenti!👏👏👍🙋‍♂️

Récapitulons : 73,5 g d'H2 contiennent 2,4 kWh. Pour les obtenir, il aura fallu produire 0,8 Nm3 d'H2 gazeux par électrolyse avec 3,8 kWh d'électricité (rendement = 63%) . Soit au total 3,8 kWh pour obtenir 2,4 kWh : la batterie va donc se décharger progressivement ! Pour info, si on veut liquéfier cet hydrogène (et obtenir 1 littre), il faudra ajouter 1 kw : ce n'est donc pas rentable...

@lolencopopo1418

9 ай бұрын

alors, fait toi même une autre qui ça soit rentable...

oh je, ein 200W Akku erzeugt 50W Wasserstoff und Sauerstoff (Knallgas) und Treibt einen Gernerator an, der dann 20W Strom erzeugt.

great video I like the inventions on this channel very creative I really liked the video of the power generator I'm going to try to make one like it someday I hope I get it I wish myself luck and thanks again for motivating my mind I want the channel to grow more and more

Ну наконец-то по казали простую схему монтажа двигателя на водороде.Спасибо.

фсе дело в красивенькой УФ подсветке, как только вы ее отключите, капризные молекулы Н2О перестанут разлагаться на водород и кислород и шлифмашина сразу же остановится)) 7 амперного аккума, не хватит даже горелочку на газе брауна зажечь из иглы от шприца, не то что двигатель завести, скорость детонации гремучей смеси, в десяток раз выше, чем у бензино-воздушной, что является огромной проблемой при запуске обычных двс на водородно-кислородной смеси, даже если вы сможете накормить двигатель достаточным количеством этой смеси, чего точно не скажешь о гидролизере из 10 пар пластин мега скромного размера, сейчас какой-то недоучка посмотрит, и побежит к себе в гараж запускать болгарку на запрещенном водяном двигателе, закончится это скорее всего взрывом ,пожаром и чьей-то смертью, или разрушением двигателя новенького генератора на три киловата в лучшем случае. Обманывать людей - плохо! Мама с папой не говорили об этом в детстве???

Даже шим не удосужился воткнуть!)))Выделяемого газа будет хватать чтоб в сутки один воздушный шарик надуть😂😂😂

Muy Excelente!

engine run smooth even low bubble generated.... amazing bro

How many times does it work ? It can't produce in off energy to fully reload the battery. The efficiency of electrolysis is too low to allow it to operate indefinitely.

Buenas, excelente trabajo, pero, falta explicar que las platinas van intercaladas, van con huecos de 1/4 y 3/8, viendo otros videos me di cuenta que le colocan aislante en el hueco de 3/8, gracias.

Hace más o menos mi padre HIZO UNO aquí en Cuba, él falleció hace 8 años y nunca pudo llevarlo a cabo. Qué feliz estaría!!!! Cuando eso no existía el internet yo lo hubiera publicado

@ketybatule5462

Жыл бұрын

40 años hace mas o menos SI SE PUEDE LO VÍ

tous ces discours et prototypes trichent sur l'origine première de l'énergie qu'on emploie! merci à la batterie; c'est comme faire de la farine à partir du pain.

@ernstlessau8208

Жыл бұрын

. . . oder aus *_Wasser_* wird 〓 *Ɠ O L D* gemacht

Very clean setup! But we both know it would take many times more of a hydrogen generator to power that displacement of an engine!!!

¡Gracias!

Genial pero como determina uno la cantidad de idrogeno que consume el motor o lo regula el carburador e hay el detalle

Ez mind szép és jó, de ha te valóban segíteni akarsz az embereknek lényeges információkat nem kéne elhallgatnod, Magam is hidrogén generátorral kísérletezem és tudom, hogy nem olyan egyszerű. Sorolom miket hiányoltam. 1. Miért nincsenek mérőműszerek? Hány Volt és hány Amper működteti a hidrogén fejlesztést? 2. Ha az indító akkumulátor több Ampert ad le, mit amivel töltődik, hamar lemerül. Tudom, hogy egy ilyen mértékű gázfejlődéshez akár 20A is szükséges. Ekkora áram mellett minden iszonyatosan felforrósodik. Amit a videón látunk akkumulátor milyen paraméterekkel rendelkezik? 3. Egy benzines robbanómotor hidrogén üzeműre alakítása nem olyan egyszerű, hogy a benzincsőre rádugjuk a hidrogéncsövet. Mit állítasz a karburátoron, amikor az folyadékra van tervezve? A hidrogén robbanó ereje sokszorosa a benzinének, hogyan szabályozod, hogy ne tegye tönkre a motort? 4. Ez a konstrukció hány percig képes működni folyamatosan? Képes arra, hogy 0-24-ben ellásson egy házat energiával? Kétlem. Az ilyen készülékeknek az lenne az értelme, hogy az emberek függetleníteni tudják magukat a rendszertől, de ilyen módon, ahogy ezt te bemutatod, csak azt éred el, hogy van 3 milliós nézettséged, és van egy rakás ember, aki rengeteg időt, energiát és pénzt fektet egy olyan dologba, amiből nem lesz semmi eredmény.

El experimento es muy bueno, excelente, resulta muy económico con agua a comparación con la gasolina, a las expendedoras de gasolina no les conviene esto ni al estado, pues viven de los impuestos que generan la venta de combustibles.

@sergiocordoba1336

Жыл бұрын

Cuál es el electrolito? Gracias

@FabianRomano1

Жыл бұрын

@@sergiocordoba1336 esto es un engaño

@EugenioRamos-om8pu

Жыл бұрын

Exactamente los gobiernos tienen una ganancia del 40 por ciento . Lo mejor de todo es que no se necesita quitar nada del acelerador pues el sistema de hidrógeno se instala a la entrada del aire y solo necesita construir un equipo que habrá y cierre el hidrógeno ,por lo regular el hidrógeno que se produce lo va consumiendo el el motor,si los gramos hacer que el mundo entero tenga su propio combustible será una gran ayer da económico ca para todos ,porque ya se está pensando en colocar bombas de hidrógeno para su venta al público o sea nos quedaríamos en las mismas. Los Hondas eléctricos le adaptaron un sistema compuesto con gasolina na y electricidad que creo un gran problema mecánico y eléctrico a los s Hondas y si se hacen esos injertos todo será un fracaso , eléctricos o de gasolina...

does last only as long as battery? how long will it run

Самый распространённый способ получения водорода из воды - электролиз, то есть разложение воды под действием электрического тока: 2H 2 O = 2H 2 + O 2. Побочный продукт электролиза - только кислород, однако этот процесс исключительно энергоёмкий. Для получения 1 кг водорода (напоминаем, теплотворная способность такого количества газа при 100%-ном КПД составит около 40 кВт•ч) нужно затратить 40-50 кВт•ч электроэнергии.

The battery is the power of the system. You need the same amount the energy to separate hidrógen form the water molecule, to use in the the engine and make it function. So you can use only the battery and a converter of 12 v to 220 or 110 v and do have the same result. you can use directly your battery to powered your machines! Good luck!

@vitogarraffa4575

Жыл бұрын

Esatto!😂😂😂

@JordanValnet

Жыл бұрын

No, without the water part, it'd be much more efficient! It's a terrible loss to convert electricity into hydrogen and reconvert hydrogen into electricity...

@xanyppuk

Жыл бұрын

Точно !

To produce hydrogen you need electricity! Electrolysis has an efficiency of 60 to 70 percent. The efficiency of a petrol engine is only a good 20 percent. More than three quarters of the energy contained in the fuel is not used for driving at all. They are largely lost as waste heat. That is why electrical energy is used to drive electric motors and not for electrolysis to produce hydrogen!

@2299jsimon

Жыл бұрын

Good info, but I think you missed the whole point of the demonstration. The point of having a generator is to provide electricity where there is none or in case of a power failure.

@centavo7714

Жыл бұрын

@@2299jsimon To produce hydrogen you need electricity. Where does this electricity come from? From a battery? A large part of the energy used is lost during electrolysis. This is why an inverter is used to convert the current from a battery.

@ernstlessau8208

Жыл бұрын

​@@centavo7714 Das Video ist völliger Sch

@crenaud590

Жыл бұрын

@@centavo7714 There looks to be a small, um, 12V battery? To start it.

@jonahwhale9047

Жыл бұрын

These kind of systems don't use traditional electrolysis, so that's a fail. Seriously, people seem to think technology hasn't moved on since the C19th. Until you can get it into your head that it's not electrolysis, like your school books taught you, it's not worth commenting. In order to learn something, you've first got to accept that you know nothing. I don't know this particular system but, in general, these kind of systems are based on Brown's/Meyer's work and use resonance to excite the water into a gaseous state. It's a very different approach from electrolysis producing (wasting) no heat & not producing separate monatomic gases.

Para A Karoui. Lo expuesto demuestra un conocimiento sobre el tema , es respetuoso y didáctico. Ese es el camino. De la misma forma que nos permitimos opinar sobre cualquier tema con o sin conocimiento, hagámoslo así. El beneficio a la larga será para todos. Gracias.

El motor funciona poco tiempo porque no puede generar la misma cantidad de electricidad que consume; al agotarse la batería deja de producir hidrógeno. Esto lo sabe cualquier maestro de física.

@achernarscardozo69

Жыл бұрын

No funciona,,,,NADA!

Il y a eu de nombreuses revendications au fil des ans selon lesquelles il est possible de créer un moteur qui fonctionne à l'eau, mais ces affirmations ont généralement été considérées comme fausses ou trompeuses. Les principes fondamentaux de la thermodynamique impliquent que l'énergie nécessaire pour casser les molécules d'eau en hydrogène et en oxygène est plus grande que l'énergie que l'on pourrait extraire en les faisant réagir à nouveau, ce qui rend impossible la création d'un moteur à eau "perpétuel" ou à "rendement supérieur à 100%". De plus, dans le cas de la vidéo que vous mentionnez, il est important de garder à l'esprit que de nombreuses personnes ont créé des vidéos similaires dans le passé, affirmant avoir découvert un moteur à eau révolutionnaire, mais sans jamais fournir de preuves ou d'explications claires quant à la manière dont le moteur fonctionne. Il est donc possible que cette vidéo soit un mensonge ou une arnaque, mais sans plus d'informations, il est difficile de le dire avec certitude.

@TheMarilith

Жыл бұрын

Utilité pratique de l'hydrogène : Alternative "verte" aux batteries pour le stockage de l'énergie car une bombonne suffisamment solide suffit dans le cas présent car contrairement aux batteries, pas besoin de matériaux "rares", super couteux mais aussi et surtout très polluant à extraire et raffiner. L'idée avec l'hydrogène n'est pas de consommer l'hydrogène au moment ou il est produit mais d'utiliser des installation photovoltaïques pour extraire ce gaz et le stocker en journée quand la demande en électricité est "faible" pour l'utiliser ensuite durant la nuit lorsque les panneaux ne produisent plus rien. On pourrait certes charger directement des batteries avec ces mêmes panneaux solaires, mais les batteries coûtent chère à produire, à recycler, et le cycle de charge/décharge n'est pas non plus éternel, elles sont qui plus est relativement lourdes à transporter dès que leur capacité augmente ce qui rend la permutation difficile voir impossible. Avec l'Hydrogène c'est un peu comme remplacer la bombonne de gaz vide de sa cuisinière par une autre qui est pleine, ça prends quelque minutes et c'est repartit pour un tour, pour ce qui est des batterie, charger des batteries interne ça prends beaucoup plus de temps, quant à l'idée de permuter une batterie vide par une batterie chargée, vu le poids (dans une voiture par exemple) c'est actuellement infaisable... Voila mon idée sur la chose...

In Indonesia, there has also been someone who created a similar device called 'Nikuba', but it was opposed by the local research authorities.

Trabajo muy bien realiizado. Y cuando se acabe la energía de la batería, ¿que hacemos?

Hydrolysis to separate water into its component parts has been around for a while and yes when you do that the H can be used to power engines. The problem is that the energy needed to separate H from O is greater than the energy available from the hydrolysis for useful work.

@usa65023

Жыл бұрын

Hook an alternator up to the battery.

@leifpersson9192

Жыл бұрын

you forgot to say that the ammount of H beeing produced in the video is not even close that what is needed to run that engine

@mavamQ

Жыл бұрын

There's little chance of convincing ignorant people that!

@scotte2815

Жыл бұрын

@@usa65023 please explain your comment As I understand it Alternators ARE hooked up to batteries in ALL automotive applications

Show me the total watt-hours of energy were consumed from the battery, and how many watt-hours the generator produced. Rube Goldberg would be impressed. It would be much simpler and more efficient to just run an inverter from the battery. But you still have to explain how the battery gets charged.

Genial.😊

That's amazing

Энергия потребляемая для разделения молекулы воды больше, чем энергия выделямая при сжигании этого же объёма!!!

Despite appearances, this is nothing more than a Rube Goldberg heating element, which will stop as soon as the battery is depleted. It would be a lot more efficient to simply attach an electric heater directly to the battery and toss the rest of the nonsense. Let me say it clearly so everyone can understand: water is not combustible. If you want to turn 2 H20 -> 2 H2 + O2 you can do that, but only by expending energy. And the energy you get back when you recombine 2 H2 + O2 -> 2 H20 will always be less than the energy it took to separate the gasses in the first place. The battery provides this additional energy, right up until it completely drains, at which point the entire system will stop. This is not a water engine. It is a battery powered heater.

i made a hydrogen cell similar once years ago i was working with it in my shop and it back fed some how and it made the loudest explosion ive ever herd and shook my shop dam near took out my ear drums im just glad i wasent next to it when it exploded its nothing to be playing with very dangerous be carful if you decide to do this

an endurance test of this system would be good

the main issue is following: the energy used for producing the hydrogen is bigger than you get

@PIIHD

Жыл бұрын

is it? ive experimented and it will be close but depending on the efficiency you make it it could possibly happen. Then you just have to upkeep the water loss and heat and electrolyte mixture and then stainless-steel plates from erosion overtime. yes, seems like a lot and a jug of gas is less upkeep. but then again further fine tuning and more people experimenting will help. it's possible and is a good source. only mainstream issue for cars and everything else is carrying gallons of hydrogen isn't ideal for safety to say the least. If it gets perfected in the future the main goal would be basically energy from water. Never that simple though.

@dertomm1

Жыл бұрын

@@PIIHD No, it's not close. Not even remotely. It's just impossible. The only thing that happens is that you store the energy from the battery chemically in form of hydrogen. And then release it again during combustion in the engine. The more energy conversion steps in your process, the more loss you have. And unnecessary complexity. The energy needed to keep the battery charged will always be bigger than the energy produced by the engine. End of story.

1980 PERU. Saliò en las noticias del diario que se habìa inventando aquì en LIMA un motor que funcionaba con agua. El mencionado invento jamàs fue comercializado. Yo pude ver las fotos del inventor publicadas junto a su aparato. No se volviò a saber màs.

@algundia8015

Жыл бұрын

porque los periodicos son sensacionalistas. mañana dices que inventas motor que funciona con frejoles y vas a ser primera plana. ese invento no tiene ni patente. osea hablamos de un estafador.

@djgdark2848

Жыл бұрын

eso es porque no funciona

@juliotorres6081

Жыл бұрын

Igual paso e Colombia, México Argentina...

@achernarscardozo69

Жыл бұрын

Creo que lo mandaron matar unos que habían inventado un motor que funcionaba con humo de cigarrillos!

@mauroorg5658

Ай бұрын

Lo Mataron

Да, это работает. Ребята даже строят генераторы водорода, который подают в карбюратор автомобиля. Расход топлива снижается.

¡¡¡ FLIPÁNNTE !! Esto está hecho de una forma artesanal. Imagínate de una forma con gran financiación privada y publica. Seria magnifico

Evidemment aucune possibilité d'électrolyser l'eau pour décomposer la molécule H2O en H2 et O2 sans apport d'énergie (E), et l'énergie obtenue en recomposition les deux gaz en eau, sera toujours inférieure à (E)

@oliviermunier

Жыл бұрын

Oui mais il semble que les lois de conservation d'énergie soient ignorées (ou inconnues) par les youtubeurs tentant de faire un buzz (et par les badaud qui like)😑

@loranpoupou

Жыл бұрын

Je me demande pourquoi Einstein a dit : « Une théorie est d'autant plus impressionnante que ses fondements sont simples, qu'elle se rapporte à des domaines variés et que son champ d'application est vaste. C'est pourquoi la thermodynamique classique me fait une si forte impression. C'est la seule théorie physique de portée universelle dont je suis persuadé que, dans le cadre où ses concepts de base s'appliquent, elle ne sera jamais mise en défaut. » sauf par des youtubeurs qui racontent n'importe quoi. Ce système puise son énergie dans la batterie du groupe électrogène. L'électrolyseur n'est qu'un intermédiaire qui transporte l'énergie de la batterie vers l'alternateur avec un rendement évidemment inférieur à un.

Hmmm.... (Guestimates ...) 50cc engine, 50 cycles per second = 2.5L of gas per second. Not many bubbles for 2.5L per second. The engine is not running on hydrogen/oxygen. If it were true, then the engine is running on the power stored in the battery, multiplied by the efficiency coefficient, say 0.4 (40%). It will take 60% (at best) more power from the battery than it is delivering. I love this sort of video. So well made and so much effort put into the construction of the cell. Pity it is a total waste of time and resources, unless you are asking for investors? It is so well made that it should fool a lot of people having no basic knowledge.

@SpiderF27

Жыл бұрын

Who told you that 500cc engine at 50 cycles per second needed 2.5L of gas per second? Maybe you wanna say per hour. Sort your shit out before you disagree.....

@PaulaXism

Жыл бұрын

@@SpiderF27 50cc.. simple adding up

If i want to do this from My motorcicle... Can i do it?

Quede satisfecho con la comprobación del funcionamiento del motor de agua, demostración, que a otros, les llevo a la muerte de manera misteriosa, o a la desaparición de los proyectos sin explicación. Las implicaciones de esta demostración, deberían ser revolucionarias en el mundo de las energías limpias y renovables. ¿Y ustedes? ¿A qué riesgos deberán atenerse por esta demostración? Han transcurrido 10 meses desde que este video saliera a luz. ¿Han tenido algún tipo de problemas? Y lo más importante:_¿se han aplicado estos conocimientos en otros tipos de motores, o fuentes, que precisan energía? Autos, fabricas, etcétera. Mis más sinceros saludos y respetos por llevar a buen puerto y honrar la memoria de los pioneros en estos avances.

@woltbeck2538

Жыл бұрын

Lo bueno es que usan material convencionales que se pueden encontrar con mayor facilidad y al tener un taller con taladro vertical y tonillo mecánico más otras herramientas se puede elaborar el proyecto. La demostración de que funciona el motor es aceptable pero de lo que no se da a conocer es la eficiencia en que debería ser mayor a la energía que se necesita para cargar la batería la cual es la que proporciona la energía CD para que el proceso de electrolisis pueda ser realidad. Ademas, debería haber una cantidad suficiente de energía eléctrica AC para el funcionamiento de algún artefacto. Mientras no se demuestre una mayor cantidad de energía eléctrica producida versus la energía necesaria para realizar la electrolisis, por ahora, el valor de dicho proyecto es tan solo de demostrar la separación del hidrógeno del oxigeno y ningún punto que tenga una implicancia comercial, por lo tanto se podrá publicar en KZread en infinidad de formas ya que no significa ningún riesgo para la industria eléctrica o automovilística y si lo hubiese sido no habría ninguno de estos proyectos en los diversos sitios web, los cuales se encuentran por cientos tan solo en KZread..

@jaimetarrasa657

Жыл бұрын

a- Pones electricidad- >Mueves el motor eléctrico. b- Pones electricidad-> por hidrólisis descompones el agua en hidrógeno -> quemas el hidrógeno -> generas calor-> mueves el motor de explosión. No les han callado la boca porque con b) necesitas 2 ó 3 veces más electricidad. Los motores de agua son una estupidez. La industria que fabrica hidrógeno no usa la hidrólisis del agua porque es carísimo en energía, usa reacciones químicas.

And what happens if you disconect the battery ? If you can get the motor to run with just a alternator after starting the motor.....then i truly would belive this work. But not with the battery still conected. It`s just the power from the battery you use inn this case.

Muy bonito pero la batería se agota muy rápido y deja de funcionar, tiene un consumo muy alto. Para los coches ya se hacen hace mucho tiempo y la verdad es que se ahorra algo, yo construí uno hace más de 10 años y lo tuve puesto en un Toyota diésel, es una ayuda al gasoil, baja un poquito el consumo. Te sale caro en baterías,

@achernarscardozo69

Жыл бұрын

En algunas religiones mentir es un pecado.

Yasak su motoro mevcutur nedemek anlayamadım vidyo için teşekürler güzel bilgi

how long does a fuel tank last?

Videos like this ruin the credibility of real researchers in this field. I think that's probably the point of them. I have been able to run a very small engine on HHO, (the gas that is being produced here by the electrolysis of water), but only if I filled a large balloon with it, (which is very dangerous if there is a flashback). In my case, I ran a long hose from a large balloon located just outside my barn so that there was both a barrier and distance between the balloon and me, in case there was a flashback. The setup here in this video doesn't output enough volume to run the engine. The electrolysers I built had a much higher output than the one in this video, but still couldn't produce enough gas to directly run my tiny test engine, which was much smaller than the one here in this video, unless I used my electrolyser to fill the huge balloon I used to temporarily hold the gas, then ran the engine from the gas temporarily stored there. It's unfortunate, because good craftsmanship is shown in this video, and the design is sound on a very basic level, but it doesn't output even nearly enough volume to run any engine I know of, which means that it's more likely that some level of deception is being used here.

@truth-Hurts375

Жыл бұрын

Everything you said is true...I also played around with this and you have to be extremely carfull ... that is the reason why you dont get hydrogen cars...how do you store hydrogen safely to drive your car for 600 or 700km before filling up again??? But...they are working on it.....

@MyVisualRomance

Жыл бұрын

@@truth-Hurts375 Stanley Meyers didn’t store it onboard. He invented a fuel injector that split the water atoms just prior to entering the cylinders. On demand hydrogen and oxygen.

@jaybrox1652

Жыл бұрын

​@@truth-Hurts375 Cmpression what else???? Some people were missing out on their Physics lessons at primary? Hahaha

@bogdanitto

Жыл бұрын

​@@jaybrox1652 splitting water atoms seems easy Little Tiny and quite sharp knife inside of the injector 😆 😅

@jaybrox1652

Жыл бұрын

@Frank Walter plenty of research a Japan car manufacture is already making the engine...the end of stupid EVs is comming fast.

This is a Brown's gas generator. It is not separating the hydrogen from oxygen, it is just generating Brown's gas. If constructed as a hydrogen generator, the gases need to be captured from the cathode and anode separately and they will come off at a ratio of 2:1. Yes, the power stored in water is very potent but requires a lot of energy to release it into it's constituent gases. "There is no such thing as a free lunch".

@user-dm9wt1hk3n

Жыл бұрын

Совершенно "да". Согласен.

@PhilippeVerdy

11 ай бұрын

Nope, this is an electrolyse of water, it works because plates are in Iron whch get's oxydated and produces ions and the energy boost that allows electrolyse. There's no other gas, but you get oxydated iron residues dispersed in water and precipitation into mold filling the bottle. Rapidly the generator becomes unusable, and white batteries are discharged. This won't run for more than 2 minutes.

Exelente

What is under the floor? 220 volt or 110?

Well, it's obviously runs on battery, while electrolysis is just another conversion, that only adds up to the total energy loss. For this to really work, you need to add more energy to the system, than it losses by heating up our universe :) It's not about efficiency of your electolysis bucket, it's about physics. And if you want efficiency, you should throw your combustion engine away :) But i am sure you know about all that 😏

@1953Wes

Жыл бұрын

Anyone who wants to prove to themselves that this doesn't work can do it very cheaply by just bubbling approximately that quantity of hydrogen through water and trying to start a decent sized motor on it. Way less work than reproducing all this and then finding out it doesn't work. I presume his "H++" is either just a salt or (if he is actually trying to make this work) possibly a polymer sulfonic acid. They've always got to throw that "unknown" bit in there to say "but you don't know everything I'm doing, ha ha ha".

@loweel2897

Жыл бұрын

You don't need battery if you use HH+ electrolyzer. Meaning, you put energy into chemical form. Of course, this is like having a battery, but , you know , people don't realize chemical energy may exist.

@unosanus6974

Жыл бұрын

???

@loweel2897

Жыл бұрын

@@1953Wes does not need to test. burning hydrogen you produce ~70 kJ per gram, electrolysis consumes at least 140 kJ per gram of hydrogen (9 g of water) , efficiency will be at best 50%. No way it works, unless this HH+ is worth ~70 more kJ per gram of hydrogen.

@user-km3qs6um1g

Жыл бұрын

Когда я создам двигателей и генераторов типа БТГ надеюсь всех вас физиков лишить дипломов, на полном серёзе.

Делал как в старом советском журнале, моделист конструктор. 1) там пластины больше раза в четыре, 2) HH+ это что? каустическая сода? Короче пробовал всякие, питал от сварочного инвертора Ресанта 250, (около 70в!), ампер 20 может чуть больше. Результат: выхлоп меньше чем затраты, так и валяется. Жаль убитого времени...

@user-uz8ch6lv6q

Жыл бұрын

Это как электричество на халяву.

@gerardmarjozijdel1028

Жыл бұрын

Castriksoda

@user-cv4eo3ue2x

Жыл бұрын

В 2005 году видел своими глазами газель работающую на такой приблуде, мощи было маловато но по городу развозкой свободно работала. потом один олух каратнул банки разнесло весь моторный отсек. как-то так.

buenos señor muy bueno cuanto cuesta una plata electrónica así cuenteme y en donde la tiene yo estoy en Bogotá Colombia

Carissimi lettori capisco i dubbi , lo sapevate che Beppe grillo ha' publicizzato la macchina ha idrogeno gia ' piu' di 30 anni fa'? E che anche italiani hanno agganciato idrogeno a macchine diesel? Se anche questo video non fosse completamente vero , non tutta l' idea e' da buttare via , in effetti ci sono poteri forti che non vogliono queste idee seppure anche con motori ibridi , come dice jerlok holmes: eliminando l' impossibile cio' che rimane per quanto possa sembrare strano e' la soluzione del problema o dell' enigma, il video 50% si o 50% no , in ogni caso ha degli spunti interessanti , mai pensare di sapere tutto e' la base del bravo investigatore , vi auguro di stare bene e una buona evoluzione👋😄👍🌠🤗😁🌈🌌

Excelente placas y electrodos toca descubrir la formula del HH+.

Remove the battery and it stops

Of course it will run on H202 gas from disassociated water. This has been done for over 100 years. The problem is it takes more energy to split up the water than you get out of burning it in an IC engine to generate electricity so it's not free energy, you're just running an engine off of H2 and O2 created using some other electrical source. Saying this is somehow what Stan Meyer was trying to do isn't correct either. His buggy seemed to work on a totally different principle that his twin brother has kept under wraps because they killed Stan and threatened the rest of his family into silence. I think he stumbled on a hack that would use high frequency microwaves to disassociate the water molecules with far less energy than just DC current electrolysis, which would make it "over unity" and therefore a self sustaining process as long as there was water available. They made sure he took it to his grave with him. Any time this has been stumbled upon I'm sure it gets a national security act "secret" patent thrown on it and its never seen again after scaring the bejeezus out of the inventor. If it's ever "really" discovered again, I would hope someone would just selflessly plaster it all over the internet for the good of humanity but I'm not too hopeful that'll ever happen.

@gotronic8084

Жыл бұрын

Este o excrocherie dupa parerea mea. Stan Meyer a obtinut fonduri guvernamentale pentru cerecetare foarte mari ( politic sau cu relatii din punctul meu de vedere), si nu a demonstarta stiintfic nimic. Banii probabil au fost impartiti, iar cand a vrut sa mai continue, nu l-au mai sustinut. Daca s-a sinucis sau daca a fost " sinucis" (ucis), nu se v-a sti niciodata.

@jamielee9350

Жыл бұрын

Yours is the best answer on here,,,,, but,,,,,,, What are those rockets sent to space with ? Ah,, Hydrogen fuel . Also... Is anyone making hydrogen cars? As of 2021, there are two hydrogen cars publicly available in select markets: the Toyota Mirai and the Hyundai Nexo. The Honda Clarity was produced from 2016 to 2021.

@jrm4408

Жыл бұрын

@@jamielee9350 I have no issues with hydrogen being used to power anything, it has a very high energy density (why it's a good fit for launch vehicles) and definitely has good future uses possibly, but not as a fossil fuel replacement in IC engine vehicles in an effort to make them more "green," at least not right now. Unless the hydrogen is created by something like nuclear or geothermal (not solar or wind which are anything but "green" and also wreck the natural landscape) it's going to be creating more pollution to produce than it would be to just use the fossil fuels directly to operate vehicles.

😮bravo merci superbe

Muito bem. Agora, por quanto tempo durará essa quantidade de água sem que seja preciso substituí-la?

This machine will initially produce hydrogen until (within an hour) the steel electrodes become foiled and hydrogen generation becomes less efficient until the reaction slows to a trickle . Delivering more power to the electrodes will only accelerate the foiling. As the (sacrificial anode) electrode become foiled the water becomes blacker as ferrous iron is precipitated at the bottom of the electo- cell. You can simply empty the solution as it becomes darkened, but the electrodes have to be bright and shiny If you want a continuous stream of (high output) hydrogen.

@christurnblom4825

Жыл бұрын

What they didn't use stainless steal? Stan Meyer used either 304 or 316 stainless as an economical alternative to platinum. I've used stainless to play around a bit & it seems to hold up.

@michaelfabrizio6225

Жыл бұрын

@@christurnblom4825 The reason stainless steel does not work well or very long (as an electrode) is because it's "passivfiezed" to prevent rust. But it's actually the released iron (FE+2) in solution is what drives this reaction. Passivation is the process of treating or coating a metal in order to reduce the chemical reactivity of its surface. In stainless steel, passivation means removing the free iron from the surface of the metal using an Nitric acid solution. When the surface iron is removed, the other components of the alloy (primarily chromium, and nickel as well) are left behind as a surface layer over the underlying steel. This layer does not allow iron to migrate into solution.

@michaelfabrizio6225

Жыл бұрын

There are electrode(s) made specially for electro-chemistry which are used in the plating industry to plate various metals. One cleaning technique toggles the plating current between the anode and cathode very quickly at a much higher current to "scrub" the electrode surface every 15-30 minutes depending on the amount of electrode degradation - which is measured by monitoring the current passing through the cell. As the (anode) electrode surface becomes more degraded - the current will drop - and (in this case) the amount of H+ production.

@christurnblom4825

Жыл бұрын

@@michaelfabrizio6225 OK but I played around with it & seemed to have much better result than you are implying. Maybe it was the specific alloy. Maybe it was the electrolyte. Maybe it was the pulsed DC frequency that matched the over-all resonant frequency of the cell. etc. It's been years since I played around with this stuff but the only time I remember getting a significant build-up of dark muck on my plates was when I used rubber washers somewhere in there. ...wait. now that I think of it I did have the iron issue but it was more like 4 to 5 hours before I started getting current drop. It would be fun to play around with this again but this guy didn't have anything but a standard electrolysis set-up so one would expect it would take a hell of a lot of energy to make enough gas to run the motor with. I was also skeptical. I figured maybe he ran his battery down fast or something.

Тесла перевернулся в гробу.Ньютон сел под грушу.Пизанская башня стала перпендикулярно....

Tengo duda , el acero inoxidable que utilizo 304 , este es el menos puro que 316 , sería mejor el funcionamiento?

forse funzionerà fino a quando la batteria sarà carica?

Ahora hay que verlo funcionar en un auto sin una gota de gasolina.

so how long till the battery runs out or you need to change the elecrolitic fluid? this is funny!

Muito bom, por favor me diga quantos litros produz esse kit de hho ? informa sff muito grato

wonderfull but whats the catch because we are starting with a fully charged battery then for how many hrs can it run

Es solo una curiosidad de la fisica y quimica , antiguo experimento no aplicable como solucion energetica , pues la convercion consume mas energia de la que produce ... 😊

@cfsotto

Жыл бұрын

​@Daniel Totalmente de acuerdo

@osvaldolanfranchi8329

Жыл бұрын

Alcanza con conocimientos básicos de física para saber que esto es un grandioso engaño.

@bryanpiriz8942

Жыл бұрын

pero anda... sopla nuca! bufarron!

Je ne sais pas ce qui est le plus déprimant, la bêtise de cette vidéo ou les 78% de commentaires "élogieux" ?

Funcionar, no creo que funcione pero te pasas una mañana entretenida de la ostia.

What is the system output pressure?

so, the starter battery is actually creating the energy that could generate hydrogen which has more energy to run the engine, drive the angle grinder and charging the the battery itself？It works only when the battery has power and not for long.

@krzysztofzawierucha8718

Жыл бұрын

It will be more effective and with higher efficiency to use a frequency inverter. Ad it will be silent. Now you have an unusually complicated frequency inverter. With a very low-efficiency class.

@simengfu7352

Жыл бұрын

@@krzysztofzawierucha8718 This has nothing to do with the types of inverter any more. this thing is already more than 100% efficient!