The First Law of Thermodynamics: Internal Energy, Heat, and Work
Жүктеу.....
Пікірлер: 351
@myron_jd1272 Жыл бұрын
Sometimes hearing the same information from a different person helps very much!
@sadhanajoseph2320
23 күн бұрын
I agree with you.
@cherylbauman95103 жыл бұрын
Why couldn’t you have been my professor in college? You explain everything perfectly!
@thanos5466
3 жыл бұрын
U should do study My girl 😂😂
@fishplayztoh
3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jefrreyjeffery2192
2 жыл бұрын
You study this in college. We study this is in 10th grade in asia💀☠️☠️
@anuragchaudhary6307
2 жыл бұрын
@@jefrreyjeffery2192 We study this in college too, we do more than this, but I'm coming back to the basics, Also Asian here.
@Evangeline_Hansen
Жыл бұрын
@@anuragchaudhary6307maybe you two live in two different countries/regions ,after all Asia is a big place
@heliumteam1514 жыл бұрын
Me watching this 5 min shit after studying this for 13 hours straight in a complex way and dreaming about this video to be enough for my exam ....
@Rahul-hp5ie3 жыл бұрын
I swear to study thermodynamics eagerly if he's my professor.Deserves a lot of subscribers and likes.
@user-em6nf3cn4y4 жыл бұрын
يا رجُل ماهذا الشرح الجمييييل ، شرح مُبسط وجميل ♥️♥️♥️♥️👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@abdulrhman.3742
3 жыл бұрын
كملتي معه ولا ؟ عندي اختبار بكره.
@Sulfuricacid__1403 жыл бұрын
i want all Teachers as you. You explain a lot of things in few minutes.Thank you..
@nischalchhetri7445 Жыл бұрын
I don't know if I have gotten this all wrong, but isn't the sign convention explained here wrong? 1) Work done by the system- (-w) 2) Work done on the system (+w) This is what I have learned. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit- So this tutorial was for physics, not chemistry. Anyways, it's more interesting to discover that we use different sign conventions in physics.
@markvillacampa4314
2 ай бұрын
I am looking for a validation of my understanding of the work done on the system because I feel like what is in the video is wrong, and I found this comment hahahaha. I searched for the work done on the system in physics and, similarly in chemistry, they are positive. So the video is indeed wrong.
@tommysheehan21362 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave helping me cram for the physics GRE, what a hero
@vaishnavipatil29724 жыл бұрын
Best video for understanding the concept
@Vagdebrume7 жыл бұрын
You do an amazing job ♥ !
@OIFandOEF2 жыл бұрын
Awesome visual examples and simplified to absorb the information being released, making understanding and keeping it in so much easier. Thank you, Prof. Dave!
@minimidder20256 жыл бұрын
Why does this channel have so few subscribers???!! You're amaze man! Thanks! ❤
@maelscott7212 Жыл бұрын
Great video, one thing you missed that I think is important is if U = q - w or = q + w depending on which subject you're taking. I know that physicists and biomedical engineers use +w.
@shreya_0412
Жыл бұрын
This is my confusion too... When to use which one?
@wetworksyt4446
7 ай бұрын
@@shreya_0412if work is being done on the system, w will be will be positive and the equation will be U=q+w. If work is being done by the system, w will be negative and the equation will be U=q-w.
@aurickbiswas8233
4 ай бұрын
@@shreya_0412 in chemistry work done by the system is negative and in physics work don by system is positive. Think of it like physics is oriented with profit and loss while chemistry is more about caring about the system like a baby😅
@MattMattMatАй бұрын
Professor Dave is definitely still saving educational lives years later with these videos
@derrickdanso66316 ай бұрын
You're making me fall for thermodynamics. Thank you so much
@TomBrooklyn2 жыл бұрын
As always, clear, and most importantly, concise. No wasted words or time. Well done, Professor Dave
@khaledzainel-dein37665 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your brilliant explanation
@bjalle35692 жыл бұрын
Nice video Dave, really helped me and my buddy Johan learn thermodynamics :)
@VishnooSpotlights5 жыл бұрын
We need more professors like you in India ...
@skullmax3595
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@captainldd5 жыл бұрын
I loved this video. so much good information!
@amlansasmal4 жыл бұрын
you are awesome sir i was unable to understand this topic...again again.... but your way is very simple and very useful to me.... keep on sir...that has a positive effect on us...😀
@ritikashrestha999410 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing this 🙏...Such a clear concept.
@jacobthonkuotamol49272 жыл бұрын
I don't think there is someone like Professor Dave on the planet Earth. I am just waiting for your inventions or discoveries my Professor.
@Amityadav99.6 жыл бұрын
are in chemistry the concept of sign of W is reverse in physics
@muhamadabubakar76216 жыл бұрын
Sir your way of explaining topic in detail is the #best.....
@muftiaaishasuhail30504 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir! You made it easy
@EngineeringStudyMaterials5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video. Well Explained. It Helps me a lot.
@user-qj3rv2mo1b6 ай бұрын
Exhaust stroke & also intake stroke are adiabatic processes because no heat is added or removed in the processes and internal energy reduces in exhaust stroke and internal energy is added in the suction stroke. Accordingly work is done by the system reducing the internal energy in the exhaust process and accordingly work is done on the system to shoot up the internal energy in the suction process.
@ziadyasser88883 жыл бұрын
man... u r the best one explain this .........so thank u
@tkub776 ай бұрын
Great video! This helped me a lot!
@sajukgeorge33995 жыл бұрын
thankyou sir, it is very useful for me
@miniaturenature25074 жыл бұрын
Amazing sir 👌 Wish you have more successful in life
@Unknown_Ooh3 жыл бұрын
I think I'm dropping thermodynamics
@Traewing
Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@cephasdn6576
8 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@bhumikaulangwar9056
8 ай бұрын
Good one 😂
@LawsonHanson200
5 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@user-yw5sc4ml7k
2 ай бұрын
😩😩😅😅😅😅
@B-MAN954 жыл бұрын
I'm really impressed , the way of teaching, how u remember all those things, can u give me any tips to remember easily
@johnrayrivas13756 жыл бұрын
Great explanation... Thanks
@dimpisharma9859 Жыл бұрын
Marvellous video
@ashensaranguhewa5 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@ahmedelshazly41399 ай бұрын
awesome, great job professor . keep on
@ramb00776 жыл бұрын
thank you very much and wish you good future
@Ali-cc3zz3 жыл бұрын
بارك الله فيك... God bless you
@v2sisters1386 жыл бұрын
Amazing video! But please specify that this is from physics' point of view. according to chemistry the signs are different. This kind of induces confusion. THANK YOU!
@sychomadman
5 жыл бұрын
thank you so much. i thought i was going crazy.
@na-chan163
5 жыл бұрын
@Mohamed Sherif how is that so?
@fatimaisra9143
4 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 the surrounding energy is the atmosphere's energy and the system's energy is the internal energy
@na-chan163
4 жыл бұрын
Fatima Isra work done by system (expansion) is negative for chemistry but positive for physics. Can you pls explain this?
@fatimaisra9143
4 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 it's positive in phyics because we are describing the system's actions on it's surroundings, and it's negative in chemistry because the system is "throwing" out work (idk if im completely correct but im sure this is a good way to think of it)
@LarryWaterАй бұрын
Thank you so much!
@manishkanna5326 жыл бұрын
superb nd simple xplanation
@HarshaAbey4 жыл бұрын
thank you
@icelerez3 жыл бұрын
This is a great video! i just wish you wouldn't have used capital letters when referring to heat and work because they aren't state functions and should be lower case. Anyways thank you for helping a whole generation of students through college.
@N3thStudios4 жыл бұрын
Thankyou Professor
@satyamsurawase48726 жыл бұрын
Why the velocity increases from Sonic to super Sonic in diffuser (for steam ) ? It should decrease as the area is increasing
@crescencelee51123 жыл бұрын
short and easy to understand thanks
@hja91572 жыл бұрын
Love to hear more from you
@aicellealcala56535 жыл бұрын
In checking comprehension, why the operation is addition?
@TheMultipower477 жыл бұрын
I wish your channel was bigger
@ProfessorDaveExplains
7 жыл бұрын
me too, friend!
@BjornKobeee
3 жыл бұрын
It is now
@unknown-gy8jz
3 жыл бұрын
Now it's bigger than ever!!!
@eyerus-uw7gt
3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains that's amazing and could you explain why U become zero when temeperature is constant plz ?
@guledchemist82647 жыл бұрын
good explanation sir
@MohanySoliman4 жыл бұрын
Good
@eshaan25005 жыл бұрын
Mr. Dave, you are awesome
@BOLYANA Жыл бұрын
3:49 isn’t if the work done by the system then it is negative?
@ariyarathneachala62342 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@mohanraj-rw9du6 жыл бұрын
Good explanation
@ViaDenglas-xz4th3 ай бұрын
THANK YOU PROF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@RANJANKUMAR-oj4wm5 жыл бұрын
Nice work
@sadhanajoseph232023 күн бұрын
thank you sir.
@kripashankarshukla40736 жыл бұрын
You deserve to be a noble prize winner. Sir you are awesome you should get a noble prize!!!!!
@AB-rj7vh4 жыл бұрын
Hey quick question for those interested. How much do you need to cool a solar cell operating at, let's say, 23% efficiency? My thoughts are that a solar cell should not change its internal energt U, so in other words deltaU or dU/dt should be 0. So 23% of the solar energy becomes electrical work, while the rest of the sun's power (1-0.23=0.77) is transferred as heat that, without cooling, would accumulate in the solar cell. In order for dU/dt (delta U) of the solar cell to be 0 you need to fulfill Q=W, so in other words you need to cool the cell to such an extent that the only heat that isn't cooled off equals the electrical power of the solar cell, in this case 0.54 times the power of the sun? Is this way of thinking correct? I would very much appreciate any input.
@carultch
Жыл бұрын
Yes, indeed, that is correct. This is why the panels heat up, if you turn off the system and make them remain at open circuit. The lack of a destination for the power to go, means that they heat up to a temperature where they can radiate more energy to the background. This is counterintuitive, because most of the time, operating electrical equipment makes it heat up, rather than cool down.
@ayesha45993 жыл бұрын
Professor Dave is amazing, honestly!
@jerichoytprem4527 Жыл бұрын
Wow. Thank You
@mahiyarahman50993 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot🌼 Amazing!
@EnricoMicheli-jo6bg3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else got exam today GL Guys also Professor Dave u a life savour
@user-qj3rv2mo1b6 ай бұрын
Professor Dave: could u do YT thermodynamics videos with examples of processes from IC engine, jet engines, rockets, compressors, gas turbines, steam turbines, boilers, refrigeration cycle, heat pumps. Thermodynamics concepts would stick to comprehension and memory by using heat engines as examples. This video was fantastic and not easy to forget now because u used mechanical examples. Thank u so much
@charleshenryescuela64522 жыл бұрын
the difference between changes in enthalpy and internal energy for the explosion of trinitrotoluene, TNT, at 25°C producing carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide gas and water vapor will be in what Joules?
@niceguy48013 жыл бұрын
Thakyou professor dave!
@leunam1leunam1722 жыл бұрын
Very great video
@physics202463 жыл бұрын
Exordinary, congratulations, Sir
@manoharapproach7178 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video, but am confusing a bit . If work done by the system that mean system loss energy to surroundings which decreases the internal energy of the system , so it should be negative. Please need more explanation
@evelyntromp789
Жыл бұрын
I’m obviously not Prof Dave but I think it’s positive because the equation has a negative W, whereas most equations have a positive work (dU = Q + W)
@siddhantgupta35003 жыл бұрын
Thanks dave
@connorbekins89789 ай бұрын
is there joules of internal energy added to the kinetic energy when a hockey puck is sliding across ice? or is there no internal energy added to kinetic energy?
@dimitrideville75142 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@sanikasanu51846 жыл бұрын
thanks
@user-zv1nt8lf4f5 жыл бұрын
so helpful
@Juboury_202 жыл бұрын
I think there are mistake in work subject
@baslielalene47022 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@abdurrakib5512 жыл бұрын
very good expression sir!
@bsatyam2 жыл бұрын
Why Q - W and not Q + W, but change the sign convention of work done to match that of Q?
@baurzhanhydros99573 ай бұрын
expansion of the gas W 0. Because in the first case, the system does work on the surroundings so it loses work while in the second case, the surroundings does work on the system so the latter gains works which will be positive
@rachellicari59642 жыл бұрын
***My chemistry teacher has told me +w=work done on system, -w=work done by system
@carultch
Жыл бұрын
Different disciplines will prefer different sign conventions. I'm accustomed to the heat engine sign convention, where work done by the system is positive.
@hassaanbaiq33164 жыл бұрын
u do explain well include examples as u did in this video
@shahxad65332 жыл бұрын
why was (150J) taken positive ??? In the Last Example.?
@user-qj3rv2mo1b6 ай бұрын
Is bomb calorimeter similar to Explosometer that explodes a mixture inside a portable sealed box to detect possible hydrocarbon leaks in petrochemical plants. It’s replaced with sensors for detection. Thanks Isovolumetric process because heat transferred from the spark to just change the internal energy inside the box and the increase in temperature or no temperature increase is visible on the meter to the user.
@jrt67222 жыл бұрын
I have a confusion question, please. In checking comprehesion question, if the system absorb heat Q = 60 J for this to occur, how could the delta U be negative, since negative delta U would be temperature going down..... how could absorbing Q cause the temperature to go down?
@muhamadabubakar76216 жыл бұрын
Amazing sir
@kripashankarshukla40736 жыл бұрын
Sir in an isothermal process how the temperature is maintained constant if we add heat?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
6 жыл бұрын
usually very slow heat exchange
@user-ji5dl2we7t3 жыл бұрын
thank you now i understanding therom esay.
@ayushijain86716 жыл бұрын
Excellent for revision, short and crisp, covers all points quite well. Thanks a bunch. I also love your organic chemistry and dna-rna videos.
@INAYATULLAHSHEIKH6 жыл бұрын
Outstanding
@stanleys24496 жыл бұрын
thankyou sir...
@fatehazkhan Жыл бұрын
I have a question. In class we're taught about four processes of thermodynamics. Isobaric Isochronic Isothermal and Adiabatic. Isovolumatric and Isochronic are the same. But you didn't mention anything about the Isobaric process. And we're not taught about the Isolated system as well. Or maybe I didn't pay proper attention. Could you help me understand?
@devi.official23 Жыл бұрын
Tq very useful
@ARJUN_Tamulpur5 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir
@karthikswaminarayan42785 жыл бұрын
please make a video on carnot engine or carnot cycle
@ProfessorDaveExplains
5 жыл бұрын
that would be the second law, the one right after this!
@ryangil39374 жыл бұрын
Hello sir.Can you I suggest more lesson sir?
@yosishewangizaw64303 жыл бұрын
sir does work done on the system indicated negative sign? please tell me.
@llll-lk2mm
3 жыл бұрын
Depends on what subject. In chemistry work done on system is +ve and by the system is -ve. In physics, work done on system is -ve and by the system is +ve.
Пікірлер: 351
Sometimes hearing the same information from a different person helps very much!
@sadhanajoseph2320
23 күн бұрын
I agree with you.
Why couldn’t you have been my professor in college? You explain everything perfectly!
@thanos5466
3 жыл бұрын
U should do study My girl 😂😂
@fishplayztoh
3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jefrreyjeffery2192
2 жыл бұрын
You study this in college. We study this is in 10th grade in asia💀☠️☠️
@anuragchaudhary6307
2 жыл бұрын
@@jefrreyjeffery2192 We study this in college too, we do more than this, but I'm coming back to the basics, Also Asian here.
@Evangeline_Hansen
Жыл бұрын
@@anuragchaudhary6307maybe you two live in two different countries/regions ,after all Asia is a big place
Me watching this 5 min shit after studying this for 13 hours straight in a complex way and dreaming about this video to be enough for my exam ....
I swear to study thermodynamics eagerly if he's my professor.Deserves a lot of subscribers and likes.
يا رجُل ماهذا الشرح الجمييييل ، شرح مُبسط وجميل ♥️♥️♥️♥️👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@abdulrhman.3742
3 жыл бұрын
كملتي معه ولا ؟ عندي اختبار بكره.
i want all Teachers as you. You explain a lot of things in few minutes.Thank you..
I don't know if I have gotten this all wrong, but isn't the sign convention explained here wrong? 1) Work done by the system- (-w) 2) Work done on the system (+w) This is what I have learned. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit- So this tutorial was for physics, not chemistry. Anyways, it's more interesting to discover that we use different sign conventions in physics.
@markvillacampa4314
2 ай бұрын
I am looking for a validation of my understanding of the work done on the system because I feel like what is in the video is wrong, and I found this comment hahahaha. I searched for the work done on the system in physics and, similarly in chemistry, they are positive. So the video is indeed wrong.
Professor Dave helping me cram for the physics GRE, what a hero
Best video for understanding the concept
You do an amazing job ♥ !
Awesome visual examples and simplified to absorb the information being released, making understanding and keeping it in so much easier. Thank you, Prof. Dave!
Why does this channel have so few subscribers???!! You're amaze man! Thanks! ❤
Great video, one thing you missed that I think is important is if U = q - w or = q + w depending on which subject you're taking. I know that physicists and biomedical engineers use +w.
@shreya_0412
Жыл бұрын
This is my confusion too... When to use which one?
@wetworksyt4446
7 ай бұрын
@@shreya_0412if work is being done on the system, w will be will be positive and the equation will be U=q+w. If work is being done by the system, w will be negative and the equation will be U=q-w.
@aurickbiswas8233
4 ай бұрын
@@shreya_0412 in chemistry work done by the system is negative and in physics work don by system is positive. Think of it like physics is oriented with profit and loss while chemistry is more about caring about the system like a baby😅
Professor Dave is definitely still saving educational lives years later with these videos
You're making me fall for thermodynamics. Thank you so much
As always, clear, and most importantly, concise. No wasted words or time. Well done, Professor Dave
Thanks for your brilliant explanation
Nice video Dave, really helped me and my buddy Johan learn thermodynamics :)
We need more professors like you in India ...
@skullmax3595
2 жыл бұрын
Exactly
I loved this video. so much good information!
you are awesome sir i was unable to understand this topic...again again.... but your way is very simple and very useful to me.... keep on sir...that has a positive effect on us...😀
Thank you so much for sharing this 🙏...Such a clear concept.
I don't think there is someone like Professor Dave on the planet Earth. I am just waiting for your inventions or discoveries my Professor.
are in chemistry the concept of sign of W is reverse in physics
Sir your way of explaining topic in detail is the #best.....
Thanks a lot sir! You made it easy
Thank you for making this video. Well Explained. It Helps me a lot.
Exhaust stroke & also intake stroke are adiabatic processes because no heat is added or removed in the processes and internal energy reduces in exhaust stroke and internal energy is added in the suction stroke. Accordingly work is done by the system reducing the internal energy in the exhaust process and accordingly work is done on the system to shoot up the internal energy in the suction process.
man... u r the best one explain this .........so thank u
Great video! This helped me a lot!
thankyou sir, it is very useful for me
Amazing sir 👌 Wish you have more successful in life
I think I'm dropping thermodynamics
@Traewing
Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@cephasdn6576
8 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@bhumikaulangwar9056
8 ай бұрын
Good one 😂
@LawsonHanson200
5 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@user-yw5sc4ml7k
2 ай бұрын
😩😩😅😅😅😅
I'm really impressed , the way of teaching, how u remember all those things, can u give me any tips to remember easily
Great explanation... Thanks
Marvellous video
Thank you!
awesome, great job professor . keep on
thank you very much and wish you good future
بارك الله فيك... God bless you
Amazing video! But please specify that this is from physics' point of view. according to chemistry the signs are different. This kind of induces confusion. THANK YOU!
@sychomadman
5 жыл бұрын
thank you so much. i thought i was going crazy.
@na-chan163
5 жыл бұрын
@Mohamed Sherif how is that so?
@fatimaisra9143
4 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 the surrounding energy is the atmosphere's energy and the system's energy is the internal energy
@na-chan163
4 жыл бұрын
Fatima Isra work done by system (expansion) is negative for chemistry but positive for physics. Can you pls explain this?
@fatimaisra9143
4 жыл бұрын
@@na-chan163 it's positive in phyics because we are describing the system's actions on it's surroundings, and it's negative in chemistry because the system is "throwing" out work (idk if im completely correct but im sure this is a good way to think of it)
Thank you so much!
superb nd simple xplanation
thank you
This is a great video! i just wish you wouldn't have used capital letters when referring to heat and work because they aren't state functions and should be lower case. Anyways thank you for helping a whole generation of students through college.
Thankyou Professor
Why the velocity increases from Sonic to super Sonic in diffuser (for steam ) ? It should decrease as the area is increasing
short and easy to understand thanks
Love to hear more from you
In checking comprehension, why the operation is addition?
I wish your channel was bigger
@ProfessorDaveExplains
7 жыл бұрын
me too, friend!
@BjornKobeee
3 жыл бұрын
It is now
@unknown-gy8jz
3 жыл бұрын
Now it's bigger than ever!!!
@eyerus-uw7gt
3 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorDaveExplains that's amazing and could you explain why U become zero when temeperature is constant plz ?
good explanation sir
Good
Mr. Dave, you are awesome
3:49 isn’t if the work done by the system then it is negative?
Thank you
Good explanation
THANK YOU PROF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nice work
thank you sir.
You deserve to be a noble prize winner. Sir you are awesome you should get a noble prize!!!!!
Hey quick question for those interested. How much do you need to cool a solar cell operating at, let's say, 23% efficiency? My thoughts are that a solar cell should not change its internal energt U, so in other words deltaU or dU/dt should be 0. So 23% of the solar energy becomes electrical work, while the rest of the sun's power (1-0.23=0.77) is transferred as heat that, without cooling, would accumulate in the solar cell. In order for dU/dt (delta U) of the solar cell to be 0 you need to fulfill Q=W, so in other words you need to cool the cell to such an extent that the only heat that isn't cooled off equals the electrical power of the solar cell, in this case 0.54 times the power of the sun? Is this way of thinking correct? I would very much appreciate any input.
@carultch
Жыл бұрын
Yes, indeed, that is correct. This is why the panels heat up, if you turn off the system and make them remain at open circuit. The lack of a destination for the power to go, means that they heat up to a temperature where they can radiate more energy to the background. This is counterintuitive, because most of the time, operating electrical equipment makes it heat up, rather than cool down.
Professor Dave is amazing, honestly!
Wow. Thank You
Thanks a lot🌼 Amazing!
Anyone else got exam today GL Guys also Professor Dave u a life savour
Professor Dave: could u do YT thermodynamics videos with examples of processes from IC engine, jet engines, rockets, compressors, gas turbines, steam turbines, boilers, refrigeration cycle, heat pumps. Thermodynamics concepts would stick to comprehension and memory by using heat engines as examples. This video was fantastic and not easy to forget now because u used mechanical examples. Thank u so much
the difference between changes in enthalpy and internal energy for the explosion of trinitrotoluene, TNT, at 25°C producing carbon dioxide, nitrogen dioxide gas and water vapor will be in what Joules?
Thakyou professor dave!
Very great video
Exordinary, congratulations, Sir
Thanks for the video, but am confusing a bit . If work done by the system that mean system loss energy to surroundings which decreases the internal energy of the system , so it should be negative. Please need more explanation
@evelyntromp789
Жыл бұрын
I’m obviously not Prof Dave but I think it’s positive because the equation has a negative W, whereas most equations have a positive work (dU = Q + W)
Thanks dave
is there joules of internal energy added to the kinetic energy when a hockey puck is sliding across ice? or is there no internal energy added to kinetic energy?
Thanks a lot!
thanks
so helpful
I think there are mistake in work subject
Thanks.
very good expression sir!
Why Q - W and not Q + W, but change the sign convention of work done to match that of Q?
expansion of the gas W 0. Because in the first case, the system does work on the surroundings so it loses work while in the second case, the surroundings does work on the system so the latter gains works which will be positive
***My chemistry teacher has told me +w=work done on system, -w=work done by system
@carultch
Жыл бұрын
Different disciplines will prefer different sign conventions. I'm accustomed to the heat engine sign convention, where work done by the system is positive.
u do explain well include examples as u did in this video
why was (150J) taken positive ??? In the Last Example.?
Is bomb calorimeter similar to Explosometer that explodes a mixture inside a portable sealed box to detect possible hydrocarbon leaks in petrochemical plants. It’s replaced with sensors for detection. Thanks Isovolumetric process because heat transferred from the spark to just change the internal energy inside the box and the increase in temperature or no temperature increase is visible on the meter to the user.
I have a confusion question, please. In checking comprehesion question, if the system absorb heat Q = 60 J for this to occur, how could the delta U be negative, since negative delta U would be temperature going down..... how could absorbing Q cause the temperature to go down?
Amazing sir
Sir in an isothermal process how the temperature is maintained constant if we add heat?
@ProfessorDaveExplains
6 жыл бұрын
usually very slow heat exchange
thank you now i understanding therom esay.
Excellent for revision, short and crisp, covers all points quite well. Thanks a bunch. I also love your organic chemistry and dna-rna videos.
Outstanding
thankyou sir...
I have a question. In class we're taught about four processes of thermodynamics. Isobaric Isochronic Isothermal and Adiabatic. Isovolumatric and Isochronic are the same. But you didn't mention anything about the Isobaric process. And we're not taught about the Isolated system as well. Or maybe I didn't pay proper attention. Could you help me understand?
Tq very useful
Thanks sir
please make a video on carnot engine or carnot cycle
@ProfessorDaveExplains
5 жыл бұрын
that would be the second law, the one right after this!
Hello sir.Can you I suggest more lesson sir?
sir does work done on the system indicated negative sign? please tell me.
@llll-lk2mm
3 жыл бұрын
Depends on what subject. In chemistry work done on system is +ve and by the system is -ve. In physics, work done on system is -ve and by the system is +ve.
Thankyou!