I do not support the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but I totally understand Russia. Nobody wants their number one threat on their doorsteps. Just like China will not allow the US to take control of Taiwan, and just like the US will not allow the USSR to take control of Cuba, Russia will not allow NATO to take control of Ukraine either.

@leon82li14

2 жыл бұрын

Good point, but just a little different. the full name of the government in Taiwan is Republic of China. Their constitution also says the mainland of China is also their territory. So it's just out civil war not over yet, we are not two countries.

@yewjo7410

2 жыл бұрын

​@@leon82li14 Understood. So, basically, the Taiwan government claims both the mainland and Taiwan, and the mainland China government claims both Taiwan and the mainland. Interesting. I hope the civil war to end ASAP. Peace.

@Legend-ck2gh

2 жыл бұрын

Biden himself said that Ukraine would not be admitted to NATO in the near future! But this was not enough for Putin and he decided to destroy Ukraine anyway

@GAMA830

2 жыл бұрын

This invasion is just drawing Ukraine closer to western Europe, and even if Putin wins this war. He's invading a non NATO country for fear it will join NATO, which after occupying it will bring his borders even closer to NATO. It was better off being left as a neutral buffer state

@sebastiandelgado6198

2 жыл бұрын

@@leon82li14 Lo mismo me dijo mi amigo chino cuando le pregunte si cree que su pais invadira Taiwan.

Just a correction: Only West Germany joined NATO in 1955. East Germany didn't join until 1990 when the 2 Germany's united. Belarus also withdrew from the partnership with NATO (I believe)

@yourstruly4817

2 жыл бұрын

Germany reunited in 1990, the wall fell in 1989

@yavuzsultanselim4581

2 жыл бұрын

Admin!

@yavuzsultanselim4581

2 жыл бұрын

Your game downed because of your trash administator.

@089roblox1

2 жыл бұрын

@@yourstruly4817 Corrected. Idk why I put 1989. I probably thought of the wall being removed.

@iamkokan

2 жыл бұрын

borders didn't update, if you look at 1950 you see serbia croatia there but it was all Yugoslavia, that's why

From 1949 to 1989 there were two Germanies, Western (FRG) and Eastern (GDR), the first was in NATO, the second in the Warsaw Pact. It is necessary to know such things.

Wish they showed that vid on national tv around the world

@dankovskimark4540

Жыл бұрын

They rather sacrafice their children to satan, before allowing this on the air.

@bentos117

Жыл бұрын

this video is misleading to say the least... until 2014 there were zero USA soldiers in the eastern countries of NATO, for example... NATO was actually slowly dying, being useless

@dankovskimark4540

Жыл бұрын

@@bentos117 yep, that is why they organised the coup in Ukraine and antogonized Russia into being new enemy and provoked the war.

@bentos117

Жыл бұрын

@@dankovskimark4540 yeah, Hitler found similar excuses for his aggressive war

@Tytyrytkataaa

Жыл бұрын

@@bentos117 so they decided to contact Ukraine and do something about it.

Imagine in a different universe, all the South America countries joined USSR then Cuba and Mexico gonna join too. I bet the US would perfectly fine with that :)

@kev492001

2 жыл бұрын

Ha not the same thing. The US didn’t create Nato, it was the UK and France. Fail

@CypherJj4457

2 жыл бұрын

They wanted to join of their own will. How Russia feels about that doesn't matter

@RExN6900

2 жыл бұрын

Doesn't matter who created it or whether the nations are joining of their free will or not, what matters is that USA will use that to place missiles closer to Russian border.

@joseph_krupa8155

2 жыл бұрын

@@RExN6900 yes USA wants to do that

@kev492001

2 жыл бұрын

@@RExN6900 I didn’t know nato was just the USA? Oh it’s not. It’s also not about nato being close to Russia’s borders, it’s about Putin rebuilding a new Russian empire, stated that in the summer of 2021

putin isn't lying after all. nato did expand eastward by a lot and ukraine is a rocks throw away from moscow. no one would be comfortable having a huge allience against themselves so close to their capital.

@CrazyBenlols13

2 жыл бұрын

If they don't want nato at their borders, they should stop invading and threatening their neighbours.

@tauno908

2 жыл бұрын

So Russia has attacked Ukraine and Georgia last 20 years.No shit little countries try to protect themselves.

@unknownfrenchman5371

2 жыл бұрын

Russias strategy since 500 years: -Have good borders -Take constantinople It doesent matter if russia is a kingdom or a replubic, it always will have these two objectives. And it will do anything to complete them. Even invading ukraine.

@CrazyBenlols13

2 жыл бұрын

@@senter9911 Good luck with your bloody wars and your war crimes.

@Nify24

2 жыл бұрын

@@senter9911 It's not like NATO wants these countries in to annoy Russia...The countries applied themselves in NATO because of the Rusia's aggresions. There are no nuclear missiles in Romania nor in Poland because Rusia would react to it, of course, but not even armed with missiles and Rusia still reacts saying that it could be armed...I mean what the fuck. This is just another excuse for politicians to start blaming each other..

Fun fact! When a member of NATO wants to leave- it does! When a member of the Warsaw pact wants to, it gets invaded! Russia isnt the Soviet Union, if they were, perhaps Nato would be worried.

@72badry

5 ай бұрын

Russia is the Soviet Union and Soviet Union was Russia. Putin made it clear in his speeches when he recalls the glory days of the Soviet empire plus Russia has been recognized as a successor of the USSR and it inherited the same chair, for instance, in the UN security council.

Considering how Nato treats Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, i can understand why Russia sees them as enemy, not ally.

@Blanka1100

9 ай бұрын

Considering how Talibs treat women of Afghanistan I am not even sorry. Nato is bs excuse for Russia. Russia simply loves annexing its neighbours just because it can and Eastern Europeans know it best. Putin wants Ukraine. It is about Putin's ego. it is not about Nato.

@debater452

9 ай бұрын

​@@Sergey___K00tI'm pretty sure that the populations weren't happy about being anaxed by their occupiers

@doraemon61377

7 ай бұрын

@@debater452 America is also an imperialist power. If not, why they are constantly expanding their presence around the world? For the sake of peace? Or economic, cultural and military dominance?

@mysticDchimp

7 ай бұрын

​@@doraemon61377 Open a history book and learn how Russia has treated every single neighbor bordering them. Maybe you'll stop simping then?

@sergeyt2947

7 ай бұрын

Considering how Ruzzia treats Ukraine i can understand why everybody in the world except ruzzian fascists see Ruzzia as enemy.

Russia was also part of the NATO's partnership for peace program, They established a great relationship but the NATO broke the agreement the reason why the former German Chancellor Angela Merkel was angry towards the US and Britain for not following the agreement.

@Lgstaev

2 жыл бұрын

It seems that Russia is still cooperating with NATO, and the war in Ukraine began due to the expansion of NATO, with which Russia did not agree .

@maxdiak5954

2 жыл бұрын

I mean they broke the agreement only after what happened in 2014 in Ukraine

@maxdiak5954

2 жыл бұрын

@@Tiagomottadmello maybe the reason that the west, not just the USA, sees Russia as hostile is because they are an authoritarian state with no political freedom to speak of

@davidpodnecky2482

2 жыл бұрын

@@maxdiak5954 that's true, east countries joined after being under SSSR for 40 years, it was without freedom, soo that's the reason they wanted defense

@davidpodnecky2482

2 жыл бұрын

And russia have parts too, soo it's like union like USA, but only in military

Saya bukan pendukung Rusia tapi lucu rasanya bagaimana media barat selalu menggambarkan Uni Soviet atau Rusia sebagai musuh kita bersama. NATO bertanggungjawab atas banyaknya korban jiwa dan jutaan pengungsi di dunia sekarang tapi media barat seperti menutup mata dari semua itu. Atau bahkan yang lebih parah, mereka yang membuka mata justru menjustifikasi semua itu.

@Lgstaev

2 жыл бұрын

In order for conflicts in eastern Europe to disappear, Russia must be included in NATO.

@zeissiez

2 жыл бұрын

Barat tutup mata bila Israel bom Palestine

@tummlo1

2 жыл бұрын

You are wrong in all. That's bullshit Learn the real history!!!!!!!! There was only one uncorrect war, the usa-war against Irak Diktator and war criminal Sadam H. But this war was not a NATO - war, Germany and France were not in Irak

@Lgstaev

2 жыл бұрын

@John Drog ну или от проблемы всего мира-Западной Европы и США... Извиняюсь

@Verroll

2 жыл бұрын

Like America Invading Iraq Afghanistan No one gon doubt that

Thanks!

Mistakes: Germany didn't reunified until 1990 Slovakia didn't broke away from Czechia until 1992 cause it was called "Czechoslovakia"

@MarosBrehovsky-ws1do

4 ай бұрын

My sme sa neodtrhli,bola to zrada bez súhlasu,Slovákov a Čechov,!!!!

La gran pregunta. Si desapareció el Pacto de Varsovia, por qué no lo hizo la OTAN si ya no había enemigos?

@ALEX-fq7hh

2 жыл бұрын

El pacto de Varsovia dejó de existir por sus paíse miembros ya habían hecho la trancisión del comunismo al capitalismo, lo que era un despropósito la alianza En cambio la OTAN se mantuvo como una alianza de protección mutua para los países ex-soviéticos, igual les convenía porque no querían otra primavera de Praga por parte de Rusia

@user-um1rl7zm2g

2 жыл бұрын

@@ALEX-fq7hh НАТО так усиленно "защищает" бывшие советские республики от России, что провоцирует военные конфликты с ней. На самом деле НАТО так оправдывает свое существование.

@elenthd4542

2 жыл бұрын

The existence of NATO that was still intact when the Warsaw Pact collapsed was a strange thing, most likely they were looking for faults in all weak countries. This was reinforced by the more countries that were destroyed the actions of the United States and its allies. And more and more countries are pressured by the United States in various ways (one of which is attacked) and more and more NATO members

@florianabalducci7120

2 жыл бұрын

Perchè l'imperialismo è SOLO americano.

@djalmabergamo5332

2 жыл бұрын

boa pergunta. mais ficará sem nenhuma resposta.

Interesting fact: the soviets wanted to join NATO but NATO refused because of some issues however if they accepted 70% of what happened in the cold war could have been avoided

@riaqliu

2 жыл бұрын

NATO was specifically formed to defend against communist and soviet expansion towards the west, hence why accepting the USSR would've been the complete opposite of what they would've wanted in the first place. You can view that in NATO's Wikipedia entry or on most historical records online. Another interesting fact would be the fact that the USSR directly applied membership into NATO just to confirm their suspicions that the organization was clearly anti-soviet.

@cakeyummy5285

2 жыл бұрын

Not really. The Cold War would have happened anyways. The Soviet Union wanted to join NATO for 2 reasons. If they were declined then it would show that America was making anti communist alliances and that the soviets could be aggressive towards the US and begin attacking US allies not in NATO yet such as South Korea and Taiwan. If the USSR was accepted in they could ruin the alliance as it would then never be anti Communist

@josealfredobarrientos1236

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t really know why NATO expanded in 1994 after USSR collapsed after all ideologically it had no purpose since the communist east fell and Russia was in tatters after that after all if you wanted to promote democracy and other things why not a military block like NATO instead of the EU

@seaman5705

2 жыл бұрын

@@josealfredobarrientos1236 NATO expanded in 1997 . And was right to continue since Russia has always been an aggressor state . And democracy does not work in countries like Russia and China .

@locosquad3588

2 жыл бұрын

Applying on NATO Russia was a double edged sword.accepting her was easy influence in the west and target anti NATO members and back up by west,not accepting meant he " proved" that nato is specifically targeting them

i loved the use of music 🎶🎼

Thank you.

To be clear, Russia is also within NATO's Partnership for Peace program.

@notyou2353

2 жыл бұрын

That's... hilarious.

@mihailrf7139

2 жыл бұрын

I heard nato broke the agreement. As always.

@anderlillemaa4392

2 жыл бұрын

​@@mihailrf7139 What agreement?

@mihailrf7139

2 жыл бұрын

@@anderlillemaa4392 Stoltenberg announced the breakup of cooperation

@mihailrf7139

2 жыл бұрын

@@anderlillemaa4392 part of a headline from the news some days ago

Strange choice of colouring the USSR red but have its allies in the Warsaw pact white. I know this is about nato but there was the clear nato-warsaw pact antagonism, two big blocks and not one big block against the ussr

@xano2921

2 жыл бұрын

he didn't put Warsaw pact countries at all

@vitez8800

2 жыл бұрын

Jos par dana i Ukrajina ce biti crvena

@Max-zo6rv

2 жыл бұрын

@@vitez8800 Путин не будет захватывать Украину а только проведёт операцию

@ZolotoiSouz

2 жыл бұрын

@@vitez8800 боже какие же вы империалисты странные...Вы понимаете что в России сейчас не коммунизм ( к сожалению)

@CR7GOATofFootball

2 жыл бұрын

@Info Mud Siberia is habitable, however it takes skills to live there.

What song is that? Epic😊

is there an updated one?

По факту: все работают в интересах США и на США, даже если это им не выгодно...

@namgiangvungcaotv9942

2 жыл бұрын

I love russia from Vietnam 🇻🇳🇻🇳🇻🇳

@user-ws4jn5nr9p

2 жыл бұрын

@@namgiangvungcaotv9942 👍

@moisesojeda1085

2 жыл бұрын

@@namgiangvungcaotv9942 🇺🇸 🇻🇳

@lefteriskasidiaris7922

2 жыл бұрын

Εμείς οι Έλληνες αγαπάμε την Σερβία κ την Ρωσία οι πολιτικοί δεν μας αντιπροσωπευουν

@myamdane6895

2 жыл бұрын

@Дмитро Саденков The US liberated the world from Nazis. Fuck Putin and his regime, and fuck you too

Look how close Russia put its country to our military bases, how dare they!

@user-lq1jc6wf5m

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah that's a really good excuse to invade another sovereign nation which isn't part of NATO

@bimbam73a

2 жыл бұрын

Yes. I agree. NATO is a very aggressive force. All murderers, dictators, and criminal nations can feel threatened

@ninaorekhova5421

2 жыл бұрын

@Chill you better watch out for what you are wishing for,

@ninaorekhova5421

2 жыл бұрын

@Chill can't believe, read your 1st statement. You are something.. , but I don't care, you got what are you wish for, you can fool many, but....

@patrickstar7279

2 жыл бұрын

Hahaha idiot. NATO is a bunch of losers. He also dares to fight small countries that are not from alliances, for example Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Sudan, Mali, Yugoslavia. Oil thieves are also in the Middle East, Iraq & Syria. What a thief hahaha NATO is an alliance of idiotic bandits of the world. NATO does more damage to small countries than Russia.

No country would want a huge military alliance near it's border especially an Alliance whom they once opposed. NATO love to portray them as the good guys but you aren't.

@Blanka1100

Жыл бұрын

Nato never invaded Russia while Russia has a long history of invading and annexing its smaller neighbours just because it could and wanted to. Nato is at Russia's borders for over 20 years and never invaded Russia. On the other hand Russia still occupies and invades its non Nato neighbours. Russia occupies 20% of Georgia just because this country has no Nato protection. Russia is not a special need baby to demans anything. Easter Europeans joined Nato to be secured because they hate Russia for a reason and lack of Nato memebrships is like an invitation for Putin to invade. Ukraine had no chance to join Nato in the nearest future. This is bs excuse. Putin knows If Ukraine had been in Nato, he would have never invaded it. He can not face article of Nato and he knows it. Joining Nato was a choice while being Warsaw pact member forced to live under Moscow's commands was not.

Otan es una alianza militar y si avanzó hacia Rusia en tiempos de paz, dejó de ser alianza de defensa. Conflicto totalmente provocado por la otan y sus intereses económicos. Lo peor es que lo integran más países y como hacen para mantener ese enorme gasto(fabricando conflictos, vendiendo armas, abusando de los países no miembros y muchas vidas perdidas).

@72badry

3 ай бұрын

And Russia being a member of Partnerhip for Peace PfP in 94 and NATO Russia Council NRC is then what? This video omits that you are ignoring it too. How about tgat those members are seeking some protection from Russia?

and then say Russia is the aggressive country... that's an alliance against Russia, how they wanted Russia not to say or do nothing?

@anneslot7013

2 жыл бұрын

@Дмитро Саденков да я также думаю об Азове и Правом секторе

@user-rg1gs4vz2v

2 жыл бұрын

@@anneslot7013 ага

@madapaca3084

2 жыл бұрын

Brain dead comment. Russia IS an aggressive country. Putin has no right whatsoever to tell Ukraine who they want to ally with.

@user-oo9em1uz5b

2 жыл бұрын

@Дмитро Саденков не считайте всех русских фашистами,по факту у нас один фашист это Путлер,ну есть конечно зомбированные россияне которые пытаются как то оправдать это и даже поддержать эту безумную войну,но они просто глупцы которые выйдут на улицы как нормальные здравомыслящие люди.только к сожалению эти зомбаки выйдут только когда у них еда закончится,короче не скоро.крепитесь адекватные россияне против войны и против Путина но нас не так много пока что

@travis07ful

2 жыл бұрын

So Russia took Crimeia in 2014 because of NATO?

Russia has the right to defend it's borders

@Plopi

2 жыл бұрын

Defending their borders from kyiv killing civs sure

@tommybahamas7374

2 жыл бұрын

Relax I’m a western and I agree with Russian concerns 100%. Not all of us in the west are brainwashed

@h3w45

2 жыл бұрын

@@tommybahamas7374 you are a rare spiece well done

@aduiduiduidui4762

2 жыл бұрын

Hopefully next time Russia will deploy weapons in Cuba or Mexico. Then the US says that is understandable.🥰🥰

@h3w45

2 жыл бұрын

@@aduiduiduidui4762 nah if Russia wants it will just shove it up in the US a*s, no missing around

Could you modify future videos to show that Germany was divided before 1990? It's pretty important to show that the East part wasn't involved.

Why no Warsaw pact?? Definitely relevant.

Почему вы выделяете Россию как врага или соперника? Мы сотрудничали с вами в 90 ые и до сих пор не хотим войны, но вы все расширяетесь.

@user-in1ui7on9l

2 жыл бұрын

just remember the US has invaded so many countries,but the western world which the US's sons and dogs pretend to not see what their father the US's has done.

@axios3853

2 жыл бұрын

They just want you to disappear.

@statsguy1446

2 жыл бұрын

Sure say that to Ukraine. Ofc everyone trusts Russia when you invade countries and threaten with nuclear bombs. The NATO "expands" just because your neighbors are afraid of you.

@foudem2001

2 жыл бұрын

@@statsguy1446 The US has never invaded countries, has it? :)

@lupisvulgaris2430

2 жыл бұрын

@@statsguy1446è un fatto che la Russia non abbia mai invaso nessuno stato occidentale ed anzi abbia liberato le ex repubbliche mentre la nato e gli usa hanno aggredito chiunque nel mondo, causando 37 milioni di profughi complessivi. La propaganda nazista falla altrove!!

So well placed XD

@holaxd1512

2 жыл бұрын

A

Name of music ?

what it means by individual partnership?

NATO: *Influenced all of Europe* Cyprus: What Alliance?

@Team_Beside

2 жыл бұрын

Неправильно. США подчиняет через НАТО всю Европу - правильно

@augustin_c

2 жыл бұрын

In Cyprus, the north are occupied by Turkish army....so is a problem there

@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaghasvdghvsjh

2 жыл бұрын

cyprus is geographically not in europe

@tonygianni3803

2 жыл бұрын

@@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaghasvdghvsjh but cyprus is part of European Union country. 💀

@aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaghasvdghvsjh

2 жыл бұрын

@@tonygianni3803 1. its not a country and it will collapse faster than it will become one 2. that still doesnt makes it european

Remember the Cuban crisis? And Cuba doesn't have a border with the US, so please stop, NATO!

@naotmaa6103

2 жыл бұрын

The Soviets we're willing to sit at the table and negotiate. Today the West flat out refuses. They are to blame for this mess (specifically the U.S.)

@Greg_lab

2 жыл бұрын

So what? Soviet Union had bases on Cuba and was planting nuclear weapons and still USA DIDNT INVADE CUBA. Ukraine isnt even part of the nato and everyone said that it wouldnt have nuclear weapons. Baltics, Polonia, Romania joined nato almost 20 years ago and they havent nuclear weapons. Only UK FRANCE GERMANY AND ITALY. Today u dont even launch nuclears from silos, u launch nuclear weapons from submarines, bombers and vehicle. Pls find another way to justify the invasion

@yerri5567

2 жыл бұрын

​@@Greg_lab "Pls find another way to justify the invasion" The reason is already very simple? NATO, a military alliances whose sole purpose is to fight against Russia, broke the agreement to not expand eastwards. NATO expanded eastwards multiple times already. Russia didnt do anything. Now NATO is attempting to expand into Russias doorstep. Thats a direct threat and violation of the agreement. And Ukraine was an enabler for that "expansion". You go figure why Russia attacked Ukraine.

@Greg_lab

2 жыл бұрын

@@yerri5567 NATO is already at Russia doorstep, i think u know baltic states. Do u know Russia has Kalinigrad? with nukes on the Poland border? Should NATO invade it? Now tell me how NATO threathen Russia, before 2014 there were like 3k NATO troops between baltic states, Romania and Polonia. How's that a threath? Now the situation escalated because NATO woke up and is sending troops, aircrafts, tanks. Germany had around 1.3% gdp into military before the invasion and it's going to increase to more than 2%, like all countries of UE. What Russia is gaining from this? Explain to me pls. Oh also Finland is discussing if join or not ( before they were neutral ). Yesterday Belarus did a referendum to reform constitution, now they can get nuclear weapons from Russia, yeah the nato is the real threat here...

@yerri5567

2 жыл бұрын

@@Greg_lab "NATO is already at Russia doorstep" That doesnt mean NATO doesnt break the agreement. Breaking the agreement is breaking the peace. At that time of NATOs expansion into the baltics states, idk why Russia didnt respond...maybe because they were already fighting a war at that time idk Im not Russia. "Now tell me how NATO threathen Russia" NATOs very existence is to fight against Russia (USSR). Expanding NATO, a force against Russia, is a direct threat in itself. Breaking a peace agreement to expand to your doorstep is also a threat. "What Russia is gaining from this? Explain to me pls" Deterrence of Ukraine being part of NATO. That is, more US/NATO military base at Russias doorstep. "now they can get nuclear weapons from Russia, yeah the nato is the real threat here..." That is the answer to NATOs threat. Get it right. It didnt come out of no where. If NATO didnt break the agreement to expand eastwards, breaking the peace, there would be no need for such actions.

Nekada smo slušali “Glas Amerike” kao glas demokracije i slobode. Danas ćemo orati slušati “Glas Rusije i Kine” jer ova zapadna demokracija je postala glas totalnog robstva gdje čovjek kaočovjek više ne postoji.😢

@bvv1712

Жыл бұрын

золотые слова!!!

@slakee77

Жыл бұрын

И ведь правда...

@KLIPONSEX

11 ай бұрын

Můžete poslouchat i ticho, už jste si vybrali. Jste s nacisty.

@user-qk3in6di7i

10 ай бұрын

​@@KLIPONSEXи это говорят те кто сами воюют за нацистов

Correction France left nato because it felt stronger on its own

@etam8099

2 жыл бұрын

if they say so

@serdaravsar5181

2 жыл бұрын

İ think they left the military part of nato

@Game_over-wp3bs

2 жыл бұрын

ага,это они изматывали немецких солдат подкладывая своих жен и дочерей))

@amckittrick7951

2 жыл бұрын

They didn't leave nato just changed their policies within the alliance.

@thomasgrabkowski8283

2 жыл бұрын

No, France is a NATO member

You should've included the Warsaw Pact.

@GenerellesWissenDeutsch

2 жыл бұрын

For real, its important to not suggest a false reality

@shable1339

2 жыл бұрын

Exactly my thought

@vikkran401

2 жыл бұрын

Also show the correct borders for the right time period. It saying 1950 and map shows Germany united putted me off right away and its not the first time this channel did something like that. Its so missleading and fake news.

@imperialsweetaniamapping1628

2 жыл бұрын

@@vikkran401 Yeah, that too.

@AnImperialGod

2 жыл бұрын

This is a biased, fake, and non-historical map video. Dislike.

what is this theme

1943 3 Рейх - 2023 4 Рейх (НАТО)

@debater452

6 ай бұрын

Russia is more facist then any country in the west

@72badry

6 ай бұрын

What? How is that? You know that Russia NATO ally on the NRC platform?

@user-yz5xp1ji6u

6 ай бұрын

@@72badry что непонятного?! Сверь 3 Рейх 1943 с НАТО 2023, на картах двух эпох. Сильно не удивляйся.) и да, Россия убивает солдат НАТО на украине. Про союз россии с этими русофобами я только от вас узнал.)

@72badry

6 ай бұрын

@@user-yz5xp1ji6u It is not clear at all, because I cannot find any paralels. NATO is an aliance of democratic countries and one country can veto anything. 3rd reich on the other hand.. well... all decisions were made by Putin... oh sorry I meant Hitler. :)

When you break agreements and infringe on the rights of others, you don't see anything, but when others try to get their rights back, you say what a rudeness. No one is rude but you

@jeckjeck3119

2 жыл бұрын

Describes Ruskis nazis perfectly.

@JoaoCosta-ly1sw

2 жыл бұрын

Except countries join NATO by democratic consensus, while countries join Russia's sphere by being invaded and bombed.

@JoaoCosta-ly1sw

2 жыл бұрын

@Lelya ZV Go back to your country. No one wants you here.

@MrLan98

2 жыл бұрын

No one want to be occupated by poor nazi Russia its why everone want to be part of civilization. Nato dont need to attack other countries and do war crimes there cuz every country want join there without forcing.

@unchartedfrik342

2 жыл бұрын

This was a non formal agreement between the soviets and US - why do you guys keep bringing this up ? + why are all eastern countries choosing to side with the west? It is probably bc russia is treating their neighbours very kindly….. (irony off)

Saya nggak suka NATO dan UE. Tetapi saya suka Rusia sebagai sahabat Indonesia.

@user-df4zf2hq6h

Жыл бұрын

Ну так приезжай в Россию и попробуй пожить на 250 $ в месяц.

@jamesbond3245

Жыл бұрын

Country - terrorist - Russia constantly attacks neighboring countries under the pretext of protecting Russian speakers, killing civilians and bombing their cities. Therefore, the states bordering the Russian Federation are striving to join NATO to protect themselves from Russian terrorists.

@MoskusMoskiferus1611

Жыл бұрын

NATO nggak ada hubungannya dengan Indonesia sejak awal

@goporou_ToBapuLLl

Жыл бұрын

​@@user-df4zf2hq6h миллионы гастарбайтеров каким-то образом нахрдят себе работу и получают, видимо, побольше, чем 250$. Может тебе стоит устроиться на работу, а не жить на мамкину пенсию?

@goporou_ToBapuLLl

Жыл бұрын

​@@MoskusMoskiferus1611 ​, only because Indоnesia does not have rich oil deposits. 😂

So here it is completely clear. No words needed.

@72badry

3 ай бұрын

Yes, as it was to all humans living on earth when they saw the sun going around the earth. If you are not curious enough you cannot come to correct conclusion.

@ellenrandoglu7615

3 ай бұрын

@@72badry Yes, he who asks lives.

@Blanka1100

3 ай бұрын

It is clear that you have to join Nato in order to be secured because Putin invades non Nato neighbours only. Nato is bs excuse for him. He wants Ukraine.

for information the small country at the extreme west is Portugal and the country located between Italy and Turkey is Greece.

@user-tf2mh3vf6v

Жыл бұрын

the turkish greek conflict over cyprus is interesting. If both are nato members. :-) An alliance with an ancient antagonism, topped with modern-day oil interests.

Considering that Moscow is located near the western border of Russia, not the center or the east...

@bobroberts2217

2 жыл бұрын

And St. Petersburg too. Name one major city outside of Europe’s influence? Vladivostok YAWN.

@mrobocop1666

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobroberts2217 Novosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk, those are megacities of Siberia unlike Vladivostok

@zondor8123

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah russia is quite overextended to the east where it should be buryat or Mongols owned lands

@rahulsubramanian6545

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobroberts2217 About that, US air bases in Japan put Vladivostok within the range of US Airstrikes.

@cvk4488

Жыл бұрын

@@rahulsubramanian6545 what about middle

Viendolo asi entiendo la preocupacion de Rusia

@juarezortizdiego8522

2 жыл бұрын

en serio hasta ahi llega tu analisis? no te preguntas tan siquiera que casualidad que lituania, estonia y letonia llevan mas de 15 años siendo miembros de la OTAN, pero ucrania amaga hace unos meses con unirse y magicamente a Rusia ya le preocupan sus fronteras y hasta realiza una invasion militar sin precedentes en los ultimos 30 años en europa?

@javier300xd

2 жыл бұрын

@@juarezortizdiego8522 Ucrania es mas grande y cuanta con mas recursos historicamente la OTAN fue creada por si la URSS atacaba como ya no existe la URSS solo queda Rusia y uno que otro pais enemigo de USA, una cosa es que uno o 2 vecinos menores se unieran a la OTAN pero el numero como ves ha estado creciendo habian acordado que la OTAN ya no se iba a seguir moviendo hacia el este pero Ucrania se intento unir, claro que hay otros motivos geopoliticos como lo dije es un vecino de Rusia con muchos recursos pero mira el mapa esa alianza es cada vez mas grande y si llegara a atacar lo mejor seria evitar que se siguiera expandiendo viendolo desde el punto de vista de Rusia y de paso aprovechar y tomar unos territorios y recursos como lo hacen los yanquis en oriente medio pero esta vez en europa

@javier300xd

2 жыл бұрын

@@juarezortizdiego8522 no apoyo lo que hace la Rusia en Europa pero tambien se me hacen estupidos esos que creen que USA es bueno y todo eso no hay buenos ni malos en la guerra solo hay pendejos que toman bando

@javier300xd

2 жыл бұрын

@@juarezortizdiego8522 solo dije que viendo el video entiendo un poco mas la preocupacion de Rusia por la expansion de la OTAN querias un argumwnto mas largo podria seguir toda la noche pero hoy si tengo sueño si quieres te contesto en la mañana y te armo un debate o mesa redonda o yo que se buenas noches :v

@juarezortizdiego8522

2 жыл бұрын

@@javier300xd claro que no es ninguna preocupación para Rusia la OTAN, si fuera preocupación simplemente no hubieran tomado acción militar y ya cómo lo dijiste, Ucrania cuenta con más recursos y es lo que Rusia se quiere robar y ya, no tiene nada que ver estados unidos, todo lo provocó Rusia por querer controlar los gasoductos que cruzan Ucrania y que abastecen a Europa para poder someterlos a su control y en cualquier momento cortar el suministro de gas natural a Europa. además también quieren toda Ucrania por las grandes reservas de gas shale que hay en el territorio y así poder ser todavía más dominadores de la producción y suministro de petróleo y gas en Europa para nada Rusia es el niño bueno, al igual que estados unidos, quieren controlar y dominar al resto de países

"not one inch eastward" is little bit understatement here lol... yeah let's expand little bit eastward but not too much ^_^

You should add georgia also when it was invited by obama to join nato along with Ukraine and they accepted without thinking about russia but later what they got is really unforgettable..... .

@thegreatneess

7 ай бұрын

Look what happens to Cuba when they were with Soviet... What do you think will happen to Mexico if Russia or China ask Mexico to join a military alliance, and Mexico accepted?

@nobbynobbs8182

7 ай бұрын

​@@thegreatneessCuba didn't got bombed to oblivion

@nashbridges-cu6dy

7 ай бұрын

​@@nobbynobbs8182just got straight invasion by US in Bay of Pigs

@Blanka1100

7 ай бұрын

Stop your whataboutism. It does not make your pont valid. Why would Mexico join Russia? What for? USA is a good neighbour of Mexico and USA does not invade to annex its neighbours unlike Russia so Mexico has nothing to worry about. Ukraine has no nukes, Nato never invaded Russia and Putin did invade Ukraine because he wants to annex Ukraine. Nato is bs excuse for Putn's greed. Ukraine has no nukes and had no chance to join Nato. USA is a super power. Russia is not. Russia is poor state and cheap gas station which can not stand it has nothing to say in Eastern Europe anymore. Ukraine s not soviet backyard and Russia is not Ukrane's master. Deal wth it. Eastern Euroeans are not Russia's buffer or slaves. They decide on their own and their agenda matters. Russia has never been a friendly neighbour. @@thegreatneess

@wolkrieth2394

5 ай бұрын

@@thegreatneess Mexico would never agree to such a deal, they'd have nothing to gain. There's also a significant difference between setting Nuclear missiles in Cuba and a nation not wanting to be partitioned.

Тут разговор за Кубу идёт. Многие из вас плохо знают историю. СССР разместил ракеты на Кубе в ОТВЕТ размещения США ракет у границ СССР - в Турции. Этапы кризиса: 1. 1959 год. На Кубе совершается социалистическая революция под предводительством Фиделя Кастро. Обостряются отношения с США, т.к. кубинцы национализируют предприятия, принадлежавшие американцам. Параллельно налаживаются отношения с СССР, который начинает закупать на Кубе сахар и присылает своих специалистов в помощь построения социалистического общества. 2. США располагает свои баллистические ракеты в Турции. Таким образом, в зоне досягаемости находилась вся европейская часть России и Москва в частности. СССР воспринимает этот шаг как угрозу. 3. Никита Хрущев в 1962 г. решает в ответ на отказ США убрать турецкие ракеты расположить свои баллистические ракеты уже на Кубе - в непосредственной близости от США. Тем более, Фидель Кастро давно просил усилить советское присутствие для защиты от возможных посягательств США. 4. Операция «Анадырь» - август-сентябрь 1962. Собственно, размещение советских баллистических ракет на Кубе. Проходила под прикрытием отправки груза на Чукотку. 5. Сентябрь 1962. Американские самолеты разведчики сфотографировали строительство зенитных установок на Кубе. Президент США Кеннеди с конгрессом обсуждают ответную реакцию США. Предлагалось военное вторжение на Кубу, но Кеннеди высказался против. В итоге сошлись на морской блокаде (что, согласно международному праву, считается актом войны). 6. 24 октября 1962 г. Начало военно-морской блокады Кубы. В это же время туда шли 30 советских кораблей с ядерными боеголовками. Проблема состояла в том, что в самом факте присутствия советских ракет на Кубе не было ничего противозаконного. Точно такие же ракеты НАТО устанавливал по всей Европе и в Турции в частности. Президиум ЦК КПСС объявляет повышенную боевую готовность. 7. 25 октября 1962 г. Повышение боевой готовности вооруженных сил США до рекордного за историю уровня. 8. 26 октября 1962 г. Хрущев пишет Кеннеди письмо, где предлагает демонтировать ракеты с условием гарантий безопасности режима на Кубе. 9. 27 октября 1962 г., «Черная суббота». Современники назвали ее «днем, когда мог кончиться календарь». Над Кубой был сбит американский самолет-разведчик U-2. В тот же день произошло столкновение советской подводной лодки Б-59 с американскими ВМС. Подводная лодка под командованием капитана Савитского и его помощника Архипова вышла в сторону Кубы еще 1 октября, связи с Москвой не имела и экипаж не знал о политической ситуации. Американцы не знали, что на подводной лодке находятся ядерные ракеты и начали обкладывать подлодку бомбами, вынуждая всплыть. Экипаж подводной лодки и командир решили, что война уже началась и начали голосование за удар по американским силам - «Все умрем, но их потопим». Из офицерского состава отказался от удара Василий Архипов. Согласно инструкции, атаку можно было начать только в случае согласия всех офицеров, поэтому вместо ядерного удара был подан сигнал американским ВМС о прекращении провокации и лодка всплыла. Если бы Василий Архипов проголосовал «за», то началась бы ядерная война. 10. Ночь с 27 на 28 октября 1962 г. Роберт Кеннеди, министр юстиции США, встречается с послом СССР Анатолием Добрыниным. Они обсуждают условия перемирия и снятия конфликта. 11. 28 октября 1962 г. Кеннеди отправляет в Кремль сообщения, в котором дает гарантии ненападения на Кубу и обещает снять военно-морскую блокаду с условием, что СССР выводит свои баллистические ракеты с Кубы. Кризис начал разрешаться. Итоги и последствия Карибского кризиса: 1. СССР выводит баллистические ракеты с Кубы 2. США выводит баллистические ракеты из Турции. 3. США дает гарантии невмешательства в политический режим на Кубе. 4. Создание прямой телефонной связи между Москвой и Вашингтоном 5. Осознание серьезности ядерной угрозы заставило запад изменить способ ведения Холодной войны, которую СССР в конце концов проиграли! Если вы хотите обладать точной информацией, начните с хронологии событий. Я вас уверяю, самое важное в истории даты и хронология.

@cccp7670

2 жыл бұрын

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺   🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺  🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

@denissartisskis1625

2 жыл бұрын

Абсолютно верно. Причём я недавно смотрел интервью с бывшим послом США в СССР Jack Matlock. Интересный дядька, так вот он признался что одним из условий договора было не придание широкой огласке факта того что США убрали свои ракеты из Турции.

@denissartisskis1625

2 жыл бұрын

Кстати, Jack Matlock рассказывал про НАТО и то что после объединения Германии СССР/России было действительно дано устное обещание о не расширении на восток и когда после этого встал вопрос о принятии новых членов в альянс Мэтлок выступал в Конгрессе США и объяснил почему это не желательно. Кто знает Англиискии советую посмотреть. Он ещё живой -ему 92 года

@user-wp8yx

2 жыл бұрын

Very nicely written. Do you think only a nuclear threat can convince the west to back down? Is there another way? Would it be different with a different culture?

@ethiop_frum

2 жыл бұрын

Дико плюсую!

I had no idea that the whole European continent (besides Russia) is either in NATO, has an individual partnership with NATO, or has a partnership for peace relationship with NATO.

@artur5165

2 жыл бұрын

@_Филип Јовановић_ little poor russia. They did it on the same extent if not more

@eggrollsoup

2 жыл бұрын

@@garzar7651 what does being a nazi have to do with anything?

@anfrex3342

2 жыл бұрын

@@eggrollsoup If you don't know why, I suggest you inform yourself... of your own free will, even if that means reading information you don't like.

@craciun2781

2 жыл бұрын

@@garzar7651 If that means that I'm a NATO supporter then yes, I'm very N@ZI

@PeterNjeim

2 жыл бұрын

Russia also is part of the partnership for peace program. In fact, all former-Soviet countries are part of this program. This video doesn't do this topic justice.

STRONGEST ALLIANCE IN THE WORLD

if you're going to make a historical mapping, you need to get your maps right. That means the correct borders for the correct year. You can always overlay current borders though. And mark the Warsaw Pact as well, make it very clear that Eastern Europe was under the Russian jackboot

曾经美国也想在中国门口建立起反华武装，接着朝鲜变成了两半。 Once the United States also wanted to establish an anti-China armed force at the gate of China, and then Korea became two halves.

@jaipur7541

2 жыл бұрын

Because of usa today india china relationship are bad unlike are ancient times

@VictorSpeed9

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you US, the Troublemaker😅

@catanana

2 жыл бұрын

@@jaipur7541 does it have like nothing to do with Dalai Lama getting asylum in Himachal??😵

@pmv2015

2 жыл бұрын

@@catanana We will always give asylum to enlightened people like Dalai Lama. You Chinese should be ashamed of yourselves. He is your fellow Buddhist and yet he is shunned by his own religion folk and is accepted by Hindus.

@sketchupstudio8449

2 жыл бұрын

@@pmv2015 Unlucky. China >>>>> India 💩

我还是想说这是一场防御性进攻，而不是入侵，想象一下俄罗斯把加拿大纳入加盟国，并部署核弹发射基地，美国会怎么做，

@pptskills

2 жыл бұрын

直接原因是当前几天俄国撤军后，乌克兰紧接着报复杀害乌东的俄罗斯人。俄罗斯有点被激怒，被迫返回宣战

@islmhhh4987

2 жыл бұрын

中俄友谊万岁，从俄罗斯问你好 ✊🏻

@kevinnguyen0014

2 жыл бұрын

🇻🇳❤️🇷🇺

@lurker7779

2 жыл бұрын

Xue hua piao piao bei feng xiao xiao tiandi

@Hayabusa-lo6bc

2 жыл бұрын

Defensive? It is not about the seizure of a sovereign state and the displacement of the million refugees we have in Poland.

What about the Warsaw Pact?

This Video needs an update Sweden and Finland Joined NATO

I really appreciate you putting this video on pretty much tells the whole story I first found it on rumble but will send people your way on KZread now

@jackduane5555

8 ай бұрын

What 'whole story'?

@Salty-TX-Assholy-io

8 ай бұрын

@@jackduane5555 whole story of why Russia is doing what they're doing because of NATO aggression who lets their enemy completely surround them before they do something about

I guess we can almost rename Europe as NATO 😅...

@Bully7930

2 жыл бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣, exactly

@GorinDima

2 жыл бұрын

👍👏

@Buto.7103

2 жыл бұрын

LIKE

@rayratchford8338

2 жыл бұрын

I would say the u s a

@BurntheKremlin966

2 жыл бұрын

Democracies and Autocracies don't speak the same language so...

You need to update it now with Finland joining

And now they still saying that Russia is the "agressor"

@72badry

5 ай бұрын

Can you explain how NATO is an aggressor in this case?

@Blanka1100

5 ай бұрын

Who did invade Ukraine, once again? When was the last time Nato invaded a nuclear power? Oh wait...

@102cm6

5 ай бұрын

@@Blanka1100 Doesn't it bother you that NATO countries would literally be on the entire border if Russia allowed Ukraine to join there? Does it bother you that numerous Ukrainian bases built long before the war were discovered at the front, i.e. they were preparing to answer for their provocations and non-compliance with agreements. Doesn't it bother you that they shelled the Lugansk and Donetsk peoples when they wanted freedom? Is this the "freedom" that you like?

@72badry

4 ай бұрын

@@102cm6 Doesn't it bother you that Finland that joined NATO recently actually has longer border with Russia? Doesn't it bother you that Putin says nothing about Finland? How far is it to Petrograd from Finland? Putin knows that NATO is not a threat but he needs Ukraine for his big Russia and without Ukraine (small Rus) it doesn't work. As he stated in his historical essay that big Russia included Belorussia and smallRussia (Ukraine) and he derives its historical rights from Kievian rus. It is nothing but a sic ambision to be like Peter the great or Katarina. Nothing but imperialistic ambission . This is the real reason behind all this madness. And when that shelling happened? Oh yes, after Russia stolen Krymea and Girkin started the separatist movement in Slavjansk. What was the thought there? Ukraine built bases on its own territiry and you consider that as a provocation? Well that is funny, because when Putin built an army of 300ths man at the border before the invassion we did hear from people like you, that he can do whatever he wants behind his borders. And I leave aside that a day before the attac, Putin was assuring everybody that he is not planning to ivide Ukraine.

@Blanka1100

4 ай бұрын

Poland borders Russia and joined Nato 25 years ago. Putin did not care. Baltic States joined 5 years later. Putin did not care. Finland has the biggest land border with Russa and joined recendly. Did Putin invade Fnland? No. He invaded Ukraine which is not even Nato member and had no chance to join? Why? Because he wants to annex Ukraine and he says Ukraine is not even a real country. He wants Ukraine. Nato is an excuse. If Ukraine had been in Nato, he would have never invaded Ukraine. He does not want Ukraine to be an independent state. Nato has nothing to do with russian greed. Nato would never invade a country with nukes. Nato does not annex. Russia does. @@102cm6

Я бы согласился с тем что Украина, как и другие государства, могут самостоятельно выбирать в какой военный альянс им вступать как и распоряжаться своим будущим, если бы не карибский кризис. Когда суверенная Куба и суверенный СССР приняли решение размещать войска на территории Кубы, у дядюшки Сэма так полыхнула жопа, что он чуть не развязал ядерную войну. Россия не нарушает никаких норм "международных правил", не создала прецедент, эти правила никогда не работали.

@Adapting.

Жыл бұрын

Когда Украина выходила из СССР она обязалась не вступать ни в какие военные альянсы. Это было одно из условий. Так что нет, Украина не имеет право вступать в НАТО. Не имеет на это право ни по договоренностям, ни для безопасности России.

@neilkigers8047

Жыл бұрын

Куба была ответом на ракеты США в Турции. И Украина не сама выбрала, "вступать" ей в НАТО или не "вступать", так как она не является суверенным государством после того, как США провели переворот в 2014 году

@blackwood8977

Жыл бұрын

@@Adapting. обязалась в обмен на гарантию безопасности которую россия сама и нарушила в 2014

@blackwood8977

Жыл бұрын

@@neilkigers8047 янукович нарушил предвыборное обещание о движении в сторону ЕС, после этого начался митинг где по приказу януковича в людей стреляли, там уже речь не про европу была, а про то что убийцу надо было свергнуть

@neilkigers8047

Жыл бұрын

@@blackwood8977 эти байки в других местах рассказывай, у Украины на такие случаи есть конституция и импичмент. Зеленский тоже не стал следовать своей предвыборной программе, но никто его не свергает за то, что он об неё ноги вытер, даже митингов нет. Если бы это был не государственный переворот, то Штаты бы не хвастались, какие огромные суммы они передали Украине и её нацбатальонам до 2014 года, которые, впоследствии, его и совершили.

Serbia was Yugoslavia, the country which was attacked by ‘peaceful’ NATO

@user-sp9gy6ry4b

2 жыл бұрын

Renat ,everything you write is correct !!! I'm with you ,brother !!!

@user-sp9gy6ry4b

2 жыл бұрын

@@xdush @•25 years ago . Where you from CLOWN ??? WEST CLOWN -DON'T WRITE BULLSHIT !!! ALL WEST WORLD WITH NATO -TRUE AGRESSORS !!! Vietnam,Japan , Syria ,Libya,Afghanistan ,Serbia !!! DO ME A FAVOR -SHUT UP ALWAYS WEST F•••CKING AGRESSOR !!!

@speisewagenschnitzelklopfer

2 жыл бұрын

Just let it sink in who is reacting aggressive here and make up your own opinion everyone...

@gezimtivari

2 жыл бұрын

Like "Peaceful" Serbia (The Ballcan covid 19)that killed innocent people in Bosnia and Kosova..!

@desinfected

2 жыл бұрын

I'm croatian. After seeing Vukovar, Srebrenica and other horrors the serbs did, you damn well deserved it. Shame on the serbian government and those who supported yugoslavia in the 90s for causing 140,000 deaths.

2023: Finland

And then they are saying Russia is the aggressor.

@user-gongaesa

2 жыл бұрын

Because Russia is aggressor 🇷🇺👉🗑

No not true, France left the NATO in the 70's and rejoined in the early 2000's

@Philippineball1062

2 жыл бұрын

Bruh 1 mistake and your calling it not true...

@barackosama6808

2 жыл бұрын

@@Philippineball1062 well if its a mistake its not true lol but yea

@Shockload

2 жыл бұрын

@@barackosama6808 Who tf cares about france anyway

@dontbelieveinluck

2 жыл бұрын

@@Shockload facts

@samuelefesoa7317

2 жыл бұрын

They didn't leave NATO. They left its command structure.

you forgot major non nato allies, can use as fact that AZ, JP, Au, Israel and Georgia and Phillipines also part of anglo-saxon block

I don't understand this "Partnership for Peace" thing. Is it like they agree for cooperation with NATO but not fully or something?

I can imagine the response if Mexico joined Russia and had Russian bases....

@Somenite

2 жыл бұрын

Not sure of the response if Russian bases were installed but the idea of sphere of influence is an antiquated concept. The US Secretary of State of state declared the Monroe Doctrine dead in 2013. The US was less than thrilled when Socialist AMLO was elected a Mexico's president in 2018 because there was a fear he would take the route of Hugo Chavez and move the country towards a communist dictatorship and seize foreign assets but there was no interference and the US has continued to work well with him. That is a far cry from what happened with Ukraine where the Russians immediately responded to their puppet regime losing power in Ukraine with the annexation of Crimea. If you look at NATO expansion as a whole you will see that not a single country joined NATO after the cold war until after Russia went to war with Chechnya after it failed to install a puppet government there. After the start of the second Chechen war in 1999, three countries immediately joined NATO. That was followed by several others in 2004 after the second Chechen war spread beyond it's borders and even more countries in 2009 after Russia annexed parts of Georgia in 2008.

@DP-eo5xd

2 жыл бұрын

Dude the Soviet Union tried very hard to spread communism to the Western Hemisphere they meddled in Central America for a long time. Countries choose american democracy because it brings wealth and prosperity to many countries.

@linc0292

2 жыл бұрын

@@DP-eo5xd dude stop wheres the wealth?? 😂😂They just became another state of puppets of the US no matter how you try to sound good we know who the real bad guys

@DP-eo5xd

2 жыл бұрын

@@Georgeed every smaller country must choose to align with a super power. Most choose the US. Facts. Forced? Soviet Union forces and brought nothing but economic despair.

@DP-eo5xd

2 жыл бұрын

@@linc0292 where’s the wealth? Which countries in the world have the biggest GDPs? And China only gained wealth after they started trading with western countries. American capitalism and security in the world brought you your phone and your internet connection and the clothes on your back for affordable prices. Open your f’ing eyes

I am from Russia and we have begged and begged many times to move the borders of NATO from the east. But no one heard us, they didn't want to talk to us. I consider the accession of NATO countries bordering Russia to be a direct threat to our safety. This is not a war with the Ukrainian people and not against Ukraine. This is Russia's war against the USA on the territory of Ukraine.

@skvlsky

2 жыл бұрын

What's wrong with NATO?

@Gravitasfree

2 жыл бұрын

It has already failed... coz you've pretty much convinced Sweden and Finland to join. If you wanted to convince your neighbours to not join NATO, you probably shouldn't have invaded one of them.

@jonsonrocket8549

2 жыл бұрын

How dare you say that this war is not against Ukraine and Ukrainian people. You kill ukrainian people, destroy our cities, your president does not consider ukrainians as a separate nation. He says that our nation was built by Lenin and that initially we are russian people which means that we must be a part of Russia. He does not want Ukraine to exist and your propaganda and all politicians close to putin talk the same way. So, don't say that this war is not against Ukraine.

@cakeyummy6608

2 жыл бұрын

They are little tiny nations. For example, Estonia is a small country of 1 million people. Russia had over 100 million, they invaded Estonia, stole all their wealth and resources, and then enslaved most of their people. Estonians couldn't vote in their own government as it was controlled by the Russians, most of the money made by Estonians was sent to Russia, and many of their people were executed whenever they tried to rebel. After the Soviet Union began declining, they declared their independent and went free. They joined the West and later NATO, they after the soviet occupation had a massive economic boom. Their life expectancy rose over 10 years, their economy grew, their GDP per capita became massive, and now they are one of the most developed nations on earth as their GDP per capita is 2 times larger than russia. They don't want imperialist russia invading them and stealing all their resources again.

@TheFrenchscot

2 жыл бұрын

I am from France and a lot of people here understand it. The official stance is to blame Russia and represent Putin as a dictator, but most people i spoke with understand Russia. We, the French, are generally not fond of NATO, because we don't like to be puppets of the USA. I hope that the war will end soon. No more european brothers wars... even more when it's in the interests of the Usa.

Why this map is not showing that East Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and Albania were occupied by russia just like the rest of eastern Europe?

@Pidalin

7 ай бұрын

Because this video is just anti NATO propaganda and it's sad that so meny people from different parts of the world here in comments have no clue about 20th century history in Europe, about USSR occupying us after WWII etc....they are like "that's why Putin is doing what he is doing" yeah and that's why we all entered NATO as soon as posibble after our revolutions around 1990, we didn't want to wait until some other SomethingIN tooks power in Russia again and Putin took power just 1 year after we entered NATO. Ofcourse he was still acting pretty normal in that time, but you can find some interviews with him from 90s and you can see that he planned this everything since always, it's pretty scary that he was pretending to be just a president for 20 years while he was planning renew USSR and become a dictator.

This video shows perfectly who "invades" whom.

@debater452

7 ай бұрын

Countries willingly join Nato

@Blanka1100

7 ай бұрын

Joining Nato is not made by force unlike being Warsaw pact member. Nobody invaded Russia. Russia did ivade Ukraine to feed Putin's ego.

@72badry

7 ай бұрын

You have no clue, do you?

@user-xe7rk3te8i

7 ай бұрын

Are we in 1863 when Ukraine,Poland and Belarus are part of Russian Empire???

@EcoZen24

5 ай бұрын

Так же было в 1939 году но метод был другой

Note: when Ussr split up, Nato promised to not expand even one inch eastwards. (They expanded a thousand miles)

@debater452

8 ай бұрын

Nato never promised anything to Russia

@anabe3785

8 ай бұрын

@@debater452 when? Specifically this one or in general?

@debater452

8 ай бұрын

@@anabe3785 They promised to not bring Nato equitment or bases into east Germany not to expand into eastern Europe that was never in the deal. Also Nato didn't break the deal, since there is no Nato bases or weapons in east Germany

@Blanka1100

8 ай бұрын

Is there any paer signed not to expand that you can show me? No. So stop spreading russian fakes. Eastern Europe is not Russia's backyard. Russia has nothing to say. Russia is not a special need baby to demand anything. Who do you think you are? Nato is bs excuse for Putin. Russia loves annexing everytime it can in the name of Putin's ego.

@72badry

7 ай бұрын

Where are you getting all this from? Gorbatchev until his death was saying otherwise. What was discussed was about NATO forces moving into the eastern part of Germany. When Germany merged? When the Soviets collapsed? The problem here was with Soviets military and arsenal dislocated in the eastern part of Germany and a risk of military collision. Nothing about otehr countries joining NATO. Baker and the USA could not give such guarantees, because NATO is an alliance and such statement would have to come from ALL members. This is bullshit argument and was refuted so many times it is pathetic to still use it!

Интересно, что будет делать США, если Мексика или Канада захотят в ОДКБ?

@Kay-lc4ku

2 жыл бұрын

They would lose their s*it 😂 The US foreign policy is the most hypocritical, murderous & cynical one in the world, they are in no position to lecture anyone on the legitimacy of a military intervention, democracy, freedom, transparency etc..we all know Biden has been conducting all sorts of shady business in Ukraine for the last 8 years. It is slowly coming to light & they are losing face so more aggressive propaganda, more twisting of the facts & manipulation. These sanctions are going to bite us all in the 🍑, wait for it. Cheers, mate !

@danno5805

2 жыл бұрын

Well America probably already did... Politicians just haven't let them know yet lol

@moscowgonzo4721

2 жыл бұрын

в этом-то и проблема, что не хотят. Как только захотят - там и поговорим.

@mykolarashevskyi747

2 жыл бұрын

Вряд ли. Мексика и Канада - нормальньіе... Разве что Гондурас и Зимбабве...

@DICYI_JAN

2 жыл бұрын

@@mykolarashevskyi747 то есть ЛГБТ для вас нормально? 🤣

Otan e EUA sempre trazendo guerras ao mundo 🙏

@Gatao_2020

2 жыл бұрын

Se a Europa Ocidental e EUA sumissem, nos certamente viveríamos uma época de paz tao grande que o Paraíso seria aqui

@lolo-yi9pz

2 жыл бұрын

@@Gatao_2020 Viviriamos numa ditadura INGSOC

@Gatao_2020

2 жыл бұрын

@@lolo-yi9pz Já vivemos em uma ditadura cultural, econômica e ideológica imposta pelos EUA e Britânicos. Com seu sumisso, finalmente estaríamos livres

@anakdesa8031

2 жыл бұрын

@@Gatao_2020 yes bro

@2n974

2 жыл бұрын

Espero que aconteça algo mil vezes pior do que a operação barbarosa pra russia

A good and strong NATO run! A good map showing Crimea as NATO. Nice! I like that! :D :D

Ми нисмо нато нити ћемо бити живела Србија и Русија и сви слободарски народи слава Богу.

@bolivia_ihatethisyoutubeupdate

2 жыл бұрын

Спасибо, братья сербы!

@goranjankovic8112

2 жыл бұрын

@@bolivia_ihatethisyoutubeupdate увек

@Flash-0000

Жыл бұрын

❤❤❤

@jackduane5555

8 ай бұрын

Freedom? You live under the heel of a psychopathic despot who is in the process of running your country into the ground. Enjoy your 'freedom', fool

@mr_koko2070

7 ай бұрын

So freedom loving that they keep annexing or invading other countries, riiiight...

This is a peaceful alliance, they said.

@MarischkaPolonskaya

2 жыл бұрын

🤣

Like many such videos, this shows entities as they were when it was made, not as the dates shown. The most glaring of course being Germany, but also Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia, which were not divided as shown, and probably others.

Update 2023: Finland is in NATO

@72badry

5 ай бұрын

Eternal glory to Simo Häyhä!

This would have been better if it also had the evolution and dissolution of the warsaw pact at the same time

@oril22

2 жыл бұрын

exactly my thought

@maciejinho

2 жыл бұрын

Without Warsaw Pact shown it's just Russian manipulation infographics

@macmcleod1188

2 жыл бұрын

Would also be better if it was more accurate. But it is okay in its broad details. Definitely slanted though.

@Somenite

2 жыл бұрын

Should also include the key events that led countries to join NATO such as the first and second Chechen wars along with the annexation of parts of Georgia. Not a single country joined NATO after the end of the cold war until 1999 which was after the first Chechen war which Russia initiated after a failed attempt to install a puppet government there which was then followed in 1998 by the start of the second Chechen war are which point three Eastern European countries joined NATO.

@elvisstergjiu2089

2 жыл бұрын

Eastern europe would be russian now

"If you want the present to be different from the past, study the past."

@ElenaMertz

2 жыл бұрын

That's why Putin learnt the past and now he makes right decisions.

@MOo8996cz

2 жыл бұрын

@@ElenaMertz Yeah, really. The new tzar makes the right decisions to start a nuclear war

@WakeUpNowUSA

2 жыл бұрын

That's completely untrue. You can study the past all you want. You can't change anything. ANYTHING. Everything occuring is on order of a small group of powerful rich people. And even the few times there happens to be a wild card in their plan, it has little to do with us. Also, one can know the truth. It only serves to piss them off because they don't know how to change it. Knowing isn't enough. One must act on their knowledge and inform others.

@Sewakanund

2 жыл бұрын

@@WakeUpNowUSA Well, What is the truth then.? The cold warfare/proxy warfare changed to the hybrid warfare as we have seen now.The processes maybe a bit changed but the target is aways the same. Most of us want to see the world of real peace.and no war. But the real world is impossible. At the moment human being in mind is as same as thousands years ago.The superpower state leaders still want to be the leader of all leaders.What the difference between the human and herds of animals called the term herds.? In the future, humans and animals nearly all of the world will be destroyed, when.? Nobody knows.

@WakeUpNowUSA

2 жыл бұрын

@@Sewakanund truth is the direct opposite of what media and politicians/ government agencies tell us. We are a herd. Farmed for our labors, money, and even our children. The truth is that without the media, 90% of all the wars in the world would not have occurred.

Did NATO force anyone to join? What Russia has done to make its neighbours turn to NATO for help, and why Russia has right to deprive any country’s right to join an organisation at its free will?

@Blanka1100

7 ай бұрын

The sad thing is there are still many people in the West who can not stop looking at Eastern Europe through Russia's eyes or stop treating Russia like a special need baby. Eastern Europeans are free people. It is high time everybody understood this fact.

@JamesSmith-ix5jd

7 ай бұрын

The USSR was not forcing anyone to join the Warsaw pact, and it also just happened to be that all members were socialist, just like today all NATO is neo-liberal globalist colony of the US.

@72badry

7 ай бұрын

@@JamesSmith-ix5jd Just happened? Are you for real? You really think we had a choice of not joining? What exactly is wrong with that neo-liberal thing? The neo-libral is not much different from the classical liberalism - still the crucial thing is liberty, freedom, equality etc. Hence putting liberalism together with colony is oxymoron.

@JamesSmith-ix5jd

7 ай бұрын

@@72badry It looks like today even putting liberal and dictatorship together is no longer an oxymoron. We live in a very strange times.

@72badry

7 ай бұрын

@@JamesSmith-ix5jdit is an oxymoron

NATO does not move forward, it is the countries that apply for it that make it move forward

@FrankCarlson.

Жыл бұрын

you re not able to distinguish truth from lies

@stephBoost

Жыл бұрын

@@FrankCarlson. Impossible to quit the NATO?

When the USSR tried to get so close to the United States, it almost came to a nuclear war. The USA was ready to turn Kudu into ashes and the USSR retreated. (The Caribbean crisis). Then many countries supported the United States, supported their right to security. Today, Russia has been denied their right to security.

@robertocarlosdasilva3470

2 жыл бұрын

Na verdade houve um acordo, mas a máquina das informações não deixou claro as coisas.

@spacegerrit9499

2 жыл бұрын

It's very, very convenient in the whole "NaTO BroKE THeiR PromISEs BOoHOo" debate to leave out the fact Russia started to invade neigbhouring countries. Somehow NATO was supposed to just sit down like a good boy. Context matters. I'm glad NATO decided that the world had changed and it needed to contain an agressive Russia - and I hope Finland and Sweden join too (If they're smart they do it in unison so Russia has no chance to pressure the one that hasnt yet). Appartently Russia is the only country in the world that is allowed to be scared and be misunderstood. F that. Russia is an agressive backwater that needs to be contained for our own defence. I'm done with it's petty excuses and lies. It's pure agressive imperialism, that's all it is. There's a difference between a sovereign people choosing it's partners versus sending in an army to create feudal vassals. The 'NATO BROKE ITS PROMISE' argument is the most easy argument to whipe off the table. Russia changed the rules - therefore NATO had to respond - something Russia did not expect. Russian puppets also tend to forget the signatures Russia set in the NATO-Russia Founding Act. Somehow that's conveniently unmentioned. Something about respecting other peoples borders? Ring a bell? The Soviet Union still existed and the countries of Eastern Europe were still part of the Soviet structures - like the Warsaw Pact - which was not officially dissolved until July 1991, we cannot speak of betrayal, because a chain of events that would rearrange the security configuration in Europe was about to take place. The entire system dissapeared! The argument about NATO lying is simply invalid, and todays events prove it even more so. It is however a convenient argument to sprinkle dust in the eyes of people who don't understand the context in which the expansion of NATO took place - and somehow create an atmosphere in the West about a 'misunderstood and betrayed Russia' - while in reality Russia is simply playing the old imperialistic game, and a defensive alliance is in the way of it's agression. Russia is doing what it's been accusing the West of doing, in tenfold, and somehow this is ok with it's bootlicking traitorious weak western puppets who can do nothing but reach for the magic 'whataboutism' wand. Empire of Lies? Sure, but we're not the ones lying to the mothers of Russia, are we?

@robertocarlosdasilva3470

2 жыл бұрын

@@spacegerrit9499 achas que a OTAN não expandiu de forma a deixar a Rússia encurralada? Se fosse os russos colocando sistemas de ataque nos países da América? Não haveria revide?

@user-gh3wy5tr3x

2 жыл бұрын

@@spacegerrit9499 Before the expansion of NATO, Russia did not invade anywhere.

@user-ez6yo2pm5x

2 жыл бұрын

Чего плетешь, дурень?!! Окстись... Ну или проспись!!! Америка спала и видила, как размочалите Европу, во всех смыслах... Россия это сейчас сделала по щелчку, как говорится!!! Так что штаты нам ещё должны поляну накрыть, за помощь☝️☝️☝️🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺👊🤛🤜

Perluasan wilayah itu, Nato Dan Amerika memang Sengaja Menantang Rusia untuk perang. Nato memperluas wilayah berarti memang kalah kalau perang dengan Rusia

@svemir14

2 жыл бұрын

?

@bviktorovich

2 жыл бұрын

Тогда по вашей логике расширение территории самой России(Приднестровье, Чечня, Абхазия, Украина) означает её поражение))? нонсенс! А расширение НАТО вызвано гонкой вооружений в прошлом.. Доктрина СССР всегда была направлена против Запада и малые страны Европы искали защиту в объединении в военный союз. Европа ещё помнит 2 мировую войну.

It's rediculus to demonstrate a historical expansion through a map, and the map itself to be wrong.... East Germany is missing, where was no Czechia, but Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia is missing... what a mess.

You forgot about Finland joining

They are a coalition of nations that never stop expanding.

@GameplayTubeYT

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah they are defensive pact this clear just spit Reason of Russia Security just to JUSTIFY his action to Invade Country and Revive the Soviet Union! Russia will invade more country after Ukraine for Sure

@yzy8638

2 жыл бұрын

@@GameplayTubeYT Defense pact against USSR, lol they are to defend against something that has long gone. Has the allies treat Russia like how they treat German after 2nd world war instead of 1st world war, things would be dramatically different. also its funny that whenever democracy, such as india, commit horrible act, like in kasmir, or israel in palestine, people suddenly lost their brain. BUT if it happen to be enemy of USA, they implant back their well washed brain and start yelling, splendid.

@janettymojilin9018

2 жыл бұрын

@@yzy8638 Very agreeable indeed.

@tm-pj4eb

2 жыл бұрын

Expansion that is perceived as agreession is not really peace keeping

@alessandrodelbianco6161

2 жыл бұрын

@@GameplayTubeYT if they try to invade Poland, Hungary, Romania or Lithuania is basically world War 3

I hate to say it but who can blame Russia for feeling threatened by NATO? There’s no more Warsaw Pact.

@wolkrieth2394

5 ай бұрын

The pact isn't for waging wars of aggression, NATO wouldn't invade Russia. Feeling "Threatened" isn't justification for starting wars.

Прям как плесень разростается.

This video should have colored the Warsaw Pact Countries...It would have given this map a little more context.

I think NATO took "Keep ur friends close and ur enemies closer" seriously...

Looks like Rusha has no choice but stop them to furthermore expension

@robertsiwek7503

5 ай бұрын

well, map doesnt show details, there was no NATO forces on eastern flank that could threaten NATO so it is ridiculus assumption.

確かにロシアからしたらこれは驚異だわ

That’s quite threatening

@debater452

Жыл бұрын

How

Thanks,perfect to share this one. Love and blessings from Belgium.

1 minute video that clarifies everything :-) And that last huge NATO spread happened when Gorbachev decided to believe the word of western partners not to spread NATO even an inch to the East and allowed to destroy Berlin Wall that led Warsaw Pact to collapse and so USSR

@BobuxGuy

2 жыл бұрын

What happened to Ukraine is the reason why most of the countries want to join nato lol

@ShadabKhan-jv3px

2 жыл бұрын

@@BobuxGuy this happened because countries wanted to join nato. Not the other way around. Russia doesn’t want us nukes to be on his border for his security. what’s wrong with that?usa invaded Iraq even when they hundreds of miles apart for the reason that their country might be at threat. Hypocrisy?

@Mr_Thunderbird

2 жыл бұрын

@@ShadabKhan-jv3px russia can't decide shit. Every country can decide wtf they want. If they WANT to join Nato it's not russia business 🙄. Those countries wanna join because they've always been scared of russia, they don't wanna be part of Urss again. Is that hard to understand?

@pacianooo3250

2 жыл бұрын

@@Mr_Thunderbird You talk as if the Bay of Pigs Invasion didn't happen.

@wkcs007

2 жыл бұрын

@@pacianooo3250 as usual... Hypocrites...

Только когда тебе переваливает за 40, ты начинаешь понимать, что майдан на Украине, революция роз в Грузии, сиреневая революция в Молдове, это всё звенья одной цепи.

@wolkrieth2394

5 ай бұрын

The links leading to Russia's demise.

@Habik87_29

5 ай бұрын

Нет никакого замысла и стратегии по окружению России. Восточноевропейские страны десятилетиями обивают пороги НАТО, чтобы их приняли туда. Украина например с 1992 года туда стучалась. Если бы у НАТО была стратегия и умысел, то приняли бы ее еще в 90-е.

@user-nx5id7bx7r

5 ай бұрын

Может всё намного проще?Россия отсталая и непривлекательная страна.Все смотрят на уровень жизни демократических развитых стран Запада и просто сами стремятся туда, а чудакам кажется что весь мир против них ополчился.При этом эти чудаки не в состоянии понять простую вещь, что нужно развивать свою страну, создавать такие условия жизни для людей и зарплаты, чтобы другие страны ровнялись на это и стремились уже наоборот ближе к России.Но это очень сложно для чудаков, проще выдумать каких-то нацистов и англосаксов, пилить бюджеты, детей отправлять на Запад и жить припеваючи разводя лохов по зомбоТВ.

@russian_ussr

5 ай бұрын

​@@Habik87_29 Ты серьёзно думаешь что будущие члены НАТО надавили на нее чтобы вступить туда ?

@Habik87_29

5 ай бұрын

@@russian_ussr я такого близко не писал, где ты это увидел. Украина сама туда ломится изо всех сил в нато

Wow, I wonder why that red guy does not feel threatened by this....

@debater452

7 ай бұрын

How because Nato is a defensive alliance

NATO: Reason behind all problems!

@GorinDima

2 жыл бұрын

Yes👏

@mrsoda6359

2 жыл бұрын

What about cancer and Ligma? I understand you are dumb but it seems like a bold statement

Italy outside NATO, we don't want to be a USA colony 🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹

@alexfrank4054

8 ай бұрын

Не ври