Conventional war Russia doesn’t have a chance. Nuclear war none of us have a chance.

@user-ez3vf2wt6h

2 ай бұрын

Уверен

@user-ph8ti7fm9b

2 ай бұрын

and in an ordinary war there is no chance against Russia And no one has experience except Russia, so shut your mouth and go serve your country at least you will find out what it is

@paulbrownett3673

2 ай бұрын

You are laughable - If NATO attacks Russia (it already is as a US Proxy and losing) then what happens when China and North Korea come in on Russia's side - THEN redo your numbers. North Viets supported by China chased the Yanks out of Vietnam. They kicked botty in Korea.

@Hunter_t45

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-ph8ti7fm9bYes, of course, a lot has been demonstrated in Ukraine with its thousands of casualties from its inexperienced army and its obsolete weapons, close your mouth and go clean PUTIN's shoes.

@richardstewart6900

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ph8ti7fm9b Please provide evidence and examples of your "no one has experience except Russia." Seriously, isn't Russia's a mainly conscript army? And I think you'll find there's plenty of military experience across the NATO forces. They don't want to invade Russia - why would they? As long as Russia remembers where her own borders are! Now, if they HAD to ....

Surely those Russian numbers are out of date?

@oldtimer3180

2 ай бұрын

Current

@BlyatimirPootin

2 ай бұрын

​@@oldtimer3180unlikely

@madigorfkgoogle9349

2 ай бұрын

@@oldtimer3180 yes, currently out of date...

@HG-ic8ks

2 ай бұрын

Yeah they need to subtract a few AWACSki’s

@user-vu9xl2yz4s

2 ай бұрын

They may count rusty scrap métal soviet éra stuff and the scrap one that Ukraine take care of to.

And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy! 😮

@katarinab6728

2 ай бұрын

Si vis pacem, para bellum

@TroyQwert

2 ай бұрын

@@katarinab6728, errare humanum est.

@katarinab6728

2 ай бұрын

@@TroyQwert so where exactly am I mistaken?

@TroyQwert

2 ай бұрын

@@katarinab6728 , blame your school, maybe. Or is it parents? "And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy!" "Imagine" is a verb that means to form a mental image or concept of something that is not present or has not yet been experienced. It is often used to describe the act of visualizing or conceptualizing something in one's mind.

@katarinab6728

2 ай бұрын

@ert guess what - I know, what 'imagine' means. However how is this related to your statement 'errare humanum est'?

No one is winning..the world will lose😢

@markfeldhaus1

2 ай бұрын

If Ukraine loses the odds of every type of war rises including in Taiwan. No one wins in war but it is possible to have "peace" and lose. During soviet imposed famine under Stalin Ukraine was at "peace" but lost more people than many a war. This war was not a choice for Ukraine. It was imposed by Russia.

@alanrobertson9790

Ай бұрын

As people will always seek advantage when they can alliances are necessary. If everyone could live in their own box and not cast envious eyes on the neighbours then no wars. But humans, even animals aren't like that. Something to do with evolution.

@asavage31

Ай бұрын

Hope we never have to see this conflict because it would not end well for anyone. NATO is the stronger than Russia as a whole but, Russia is a nuclear power. If Putin faces an existential crisis I wouldn’t doubt that he would use a nuke to deter a NATO advance on Moscow. This would bring about a nuclear holocaust. We all lose!

@BlauImHerzen

Ай бұрын

The African Bushmen win, because they don't notice anything about the World War. If everyone else died out, they would still live in the jungle in their mud huts without a care in the world xO

@stuartehrlich4499

Ай бұрын

loose?? word is LOSE

The combined population of just France & Germany exceeds Russia. Both have a larger economy (so does the next 2: England & Italy). The idea that Russia would attack Nato is ludicrous. Nato is more than capable of handling Russia even without the US.

@dennisrichards7994

2 ай бұрын

You really think that Russia would be alone against NATO , most of the world will jump on Russia's side , you pricks are hated world wide !!!

@user-ib7fh2td4c

2 ай бұрын

1945

@suspiciousminds1750

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ib7fh2td4c ?

@charlyvanbuuren2947

2 ай бұрын

​@@user-ib7fh2td4c Did only happen with western support for the Sovjets in financial and material support. Plus the second front after D day. But that doesn't seem to fit in the Russian narrative does it ?

@RobbobRobbob

2 ай бұрын

2024

Oppenheimer tells Einstein that, "When I came to you with those calculations...we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world." Following a pregnant pause, Oppenheimer adds, "I believe we did."

@geraldbeddows9017

Ай бұрын

Think that tells you a lot about how governments feel about their people.

doesn't matter who is has more fire power, it is the will and courage, Russia had the fire power in Finland yet only 95 000 Finnish soldiers died and 1 million Russians died there in ww2

@zvonkovarda8682

2 ай бұрын

It is silly to compare USSR in WW2, and todays nuclear superpower RF

@EsaMyllyla

2 ай бұрын

wow did you read what i write wrote doesn't matter who has more fire power, need to spell it for you@@zvonkovarda8682

@MissiDamariss

2 ай бұрын

yeah same sh*t with USA. why 1st army in the world cant win the Afgan war

@nledaig

2 ай бұрын

The Huns lost. The West built Treblinka but the East liberated it. You are going to lose this time too.

@papatango5085

2 ай бұрын

​@@nledaigtreblinka was nazi camp not west

With geopolitics in the state they are, you need to add in China, the Middle East, India, Brazil, North Korea, African nations in to Russia’s figures, because that is how polarised the world is right now! And I bet the comparison wouldn’t favour us in NATO very much at all!

@yomama629

3 күн бұрын

Brazil is an ally of the US and would remain neutral, India won't get involved because they hate China and are interested in doing business with the West, North Korea and African nations are a total non-factor. The most powerful country in the Middle East is Israel which is a US ally, the second most powerful is Saudi Arabia which is also a US ally. China is the only economy that can threaten the US, but they certainly wouldn't jump gung ho into a war with the West if it weren't for their own interests (like going for Taiwan) because their economy simply depends on Western trade to survive. The US is the richest country in the world and the EU is the largest economic bloc in the world after the US, and militarily NATO is simply unmatched. Russia loses just as hard even if you add all that

Putin : Make NATO Great Again 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@RonaldTolar-pg8uh

2 ай бұрын

idiot,Russia is the victim of US forced Aggression to Russia because 1 camp wants their massive resources and the other camp are the despises of Russia for Overcoming the atheist, Godless leaders of the Bolshevics and becoming Christian again. Don't you know who is controlling your foriegn policy in USA ???.. People like Bllimken, Nuland, Shermin, Richard Hass, Garland, Yellen, Kamala Harris and hubby, Levine, the ADL, the AIPAC, The MSM, etc, etc.

@TheRezro

2 ай бұрын

NATO was overpowering Russia even before the war. It is why Trump rambling make no sense.

@user-wh3zv3ey7g

Ай бұрын

он ведет НАТО к развалу

@marcopolo7337

Ай бұрын

@@user-wh3zv3ey7g En attendant combien de centaines de milliers de russes a t'il conduit nonchalamment à la mort et pour un caprice de dictateur fou.

@vicksys

Ай бұрын

ya tak ne dumayu.

1 Air craft carrier for Russia? Admiral Kunitzof probably? Didn't saw sea from 10 year at least!! And just a piece of junk.

@Chiginev

2 ай бұрын

Remind me, who a week ago dropped transcontinental missile in a meter from its launcher?)

@user-gk3hu8pg6x

2 ай бұрын

Admiral Kuznetsov, at least you wrote the names correctly of what you are talking about, he will at least go to sea, unlike your new shit, which cannot leave the dock) or drowning after the first voyage

@Platiaum

2 ай бұрын

Yes....and 42 Awacs rsrsrs impossible.

@aj_shooter4097

2 ай бұрын

Been upgrading it for last 15 years. Probably has 80s tech installed now

@mitchwhite1859

2 ай бұрын

Piece of junk. That's not nice. But since you said it, total and complete junk.

RU doesn't have as many tanks now. That 15K was the highest estimate before they invaded UA

@kirilld6206

2 ай бұрын

NATO doesn't have a single modern tank anyway. Old junk from 80s at best with 60-70 tonnes and eating fuel like crazy even while standing (abrams).

@MKUltra-ti8ts

2 ай бұрын

Да да , "у нас все закончилось!!! , Может принесешь литр водки , а то медведь мой куда-то потерялся !!))"

@neilgale2292

2 ай бұрын

And 2 years later they have not built 1 ?

@lorax8172

2 ай бұрын

@@neilgale2292 they are bringing 3 to 4 online each day. What that means is they are taking old tanks out of storage and getting them working again. They are barely making new tanks, just getting old ones working

@vicamu541

2 ай бұрын

probably around 10-11k now

Pretty outdated. For example, Russia now has 6 AWACs, not 42.

@zvonkovarda8682

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@alpearson9158

2 ай бұрын

most Russians have no clue about losses so sad

@DivannyLegion

Ай бұрын

Братан, большинство узких понятие на имеют что такое ДРЛО​@@alpearson9158

@drake000666

Ай бұрын

@@alpearson9158 Yes and you do, what you believe any number coming from Ukraine, they are as real as the Ghost of Kiev was.

@user-qu8kg5zu3b

Ай бұрын

​@@alpearson9158большинство европейцев и понятия не имеют что заводы в 3-4 раза больше сейчас выпускают все снаряды и технику

32 countries compare to one country. And lets not forget the most important thing. THER WOULD BE NO VICTORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BRICS vs NATO is the right comparison. 31 Nations vs 1 Nation is a funny comparison.

@Darth_Vader4.9

2 ай бұрын

So the BRICS is not a military alliance.

@orionlt1028

2 ай бұрын

@@Darth_Vader4.9 for now

@Njerimebanane

2 ай бұрын

Brics isnt a military alliance. China and india would never defend each other and brazil and south africa wouldnt be able to ship any troops to asia or europe because of the american navy.

@yomama629

2 күн бұрын

The G7 is the right comparison to BRICS, both are economic forums without any military or geopolitical power. Russia's equivalent to NATO is CSTO, which is a complete farce due to the fact that member states go to war with each other and Russia does nothing to guarantee the security of its CSTO partners

Great video, I wonder how strong the antimissile defence systems are for both countries.

Interestingly, there are many comments that these figures are no longer relevant due to the losses of the Russian army in the current war, but no one (or almost no one) says that NATO is also losing equipment, and sometimes officers, in the war in Ukraine

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

Ukraine losing, but basement dwellers "soldiers" here are in another reality 🙂...

No doubt who is the stronger. Q: are the russian numbers before ukraine invasuon or current?

@andrewaustin6369

2 ай бұрын

Clearly figures are from before the 7 day special military operation.

@paulbrownett3673

2 ай бұрын

That would be the Russians - NATO Countries are too full of snowflakes that will not fight. Mark Twain said - "It is not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog."

@madigorfkgoogle9349

2 ай бұрын

before, and even that was fake.

@lorax8172

2 ай бұрын

These numbers are the highest estimates before the war, and those numbers included all units, even those rusting in storage facilities.

@nonamenosurname8516

2 ай бұрын

Yes numbers are before therefor whole video has no point

Hello, nice video, a short comment about budget, in general costs, could be interesting to indicate the purchasing power parity

@BlyatimirPootin

2 ай бұрын

😂

@longjohn526

2 ай бұрын

The problem with purchasing power parity is it fails to take into account Quality of Life and quality of product availability...... Sure a Russian can purchase a washer - drier cheaper than a German but a piece of sh*t is a piece of sh*t no matter the cost savings ...... You put up a Russian manufactured device vs a German manufactured device the German device is in an entirely different league

@bramdeclercq6188

Ай бұрын

​@@longjohn526quality ! That is what russia lacks big time ... none of their shit is good .. from weapons to cars to everything ! I would rather live in congo than russia ... 3th world piece of shit .. that is what russia is ...

Парни, мне нравится такое отношение к нам по конвенциональному расчету. Древняя техника, Онли конспритс и призонерс. Блен, пусть так и думают. Мы ждем всех великих вояк из могучих экономик, котрые шерли энд обвиос справятся даже без сша!

@sanygoyou8125

25 күн бұрын

НАТО думали розсипатися, але все ж ворог дурний ще є

@driver01german

24 күн бұрын

Anyone travelling to the Ukraine with a T-54 and T-55 already has powerful potential! And the Armata is already pausing at the parade in Moscow 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

@@driver01german So why Ukrs are losing? Did the've "learned" from you, Germans, how to lose big time 🙂?

@driver01german

4 күн бұрын

@@timur3505 Just a quick question... What nationality are you? This would make my answer to your question much easier.

@jhonwik7849

3 күн бұрын

🤔

looks lie a "get back in your box Russia" moment

One good news for NATO: "Hungary’s Parliament Approves Sweden’s NATO Bid After Stalling Budapest had been the final obstacle to the Nordic country’s joining the alliance, which has been trying to isolate Russia over its war in Ukraine." (New York Times, 02-26, 2024)

@noasailing27feet

2 ай бұрын

And you think you will get from Sweden ?? 😂😂😂

@aj_shooter4097

2 ай бұрын

They asked us to join what are you expecting from them?

@zvonkovarda8682

2 ай бұрын

Veey bad news for Swedes

@MissiDamariss

2 ай бұрын

so neutral

@noasailing27feet

2 ай бұрын

And how is the future for Sweden ?.🤣🤣

Many orthograph errors in the initial disclaimer = I'm off...

Если бы все эти деньги были отданы людям то каждый житель этой планеты жил бы в достатках и ни в чем не нуждался.

@taand4725

Ай бұрын

If more people in Russia stood up to Putin, we wouldn't be in this mess

@user-xt3sd5kf5c

Ай бұрын

That is not how the world works buddy, not at all.

Humanity needs to stop all this! WAR IS ALWAYS SHIT!!!

What if we exclude Turkey who's a NATO member but a Russian ally? The results would be slightly different...

@turk6882

2 ай бұрын

For some reason, other states in NATO do not treat us as if we were allies at all. In fact, they have been financing terrorist groups on Turkey's eastern borders for 40 years. When we carry out operations against terrorist organizations, they impose an embargo on us. These terrorist organizations threaten our nation and state, and the ammunition they have is donated by NATO countries. The amount of money Turkey has spent in 40 years to fight against terrorism is more than 4 trillion dollars. In Russia's war with Europe, Turkey will form its own pole, independent of NATO, and we will act with whoever is useful to us. Europe's problems do not concern Turkey much. Just like the Europeans did to us.

@Countimounti

Ай бұрын

Turkey would go belly up immediatly. Economy is already on the brink of collapse.

@jonmce1

Ай бұрын

hardly, Turkey would never fight for Russia.

@user-wh3zv3ey7g

Ай бұрын

Еще при войне с НАТО за Россию будет Китай, Иран, Сирия, Индия, ОАЭ, Саудовская аравия, Беларусь, вся африка. Расклад будет совершенно иным))

@user-qu8kg5zu3b

Ай бұрын

Не много ,а намного больше ,Америка за океаном не сможет с Канадой все быстро поставлять ,но лучше без войны

Thanks for this interesting video! It would a bit more informative, to look at the comparison of the east and western blocks. May be that a miilitary conflict between NATO an Russia will expand to a global conflict.

Co to jest: Pali 20 litrów ropy na godzinę i przekraja jabłko na 3 części? - radziecka maszyna do krojenia jabłek na 4 części...

@user-zo7zr2vz9h

10 күн бұрын

На Поклонной горе , в Москве, результат действия этой машины)) целая выставка!!

Where are the counts for the different missiles ? ( this would include air-launched hypersonic missiles )

@alpearson9158

2 ай бұрын

APPARENTLY ALL EXPENDED AS NO WESTERN GPS PARTS AVAILABLE

@SewTubular

2 ай бұрын

@@alpearson9158 Russia completely blocks GPS anywhere it has military, and uses Russian Glonass technology that transmits simultaneously on 14 different frequencies.

@victorhopper6774

Ай бұрын

@@SewTubular very outdated

@SewTubular

Ай бұрын

@@victorhopper6774 It works. Glonass 3rd generation was released a couple of months ago. HIMARS aren't working because they're based on GPS, but Russian missiles and glide-bombs are hitting their targets because they use Glonass Gen 3.

@Countimounti

Ай бұрын

@@SewTubular Himars aren't working? Video evidence says differently.

Except 1500 operational russian tanks is a more realistic number. Rest is junk, used for spare parts or to refurbish them to useful tanks. But yes: they build 100+ a month now, to cope with losses in the war - keeping the total around 1500 as well.

@miguelpericas6154

2 ай бұрын

Well they make +1700 tanks per year, not including ifvs and apcs there

@bakimc4722

2 ай бұрын

You're a number, so you know it, stupid one 😆

@audonfred7487

2 ай бұрын

@@miguelpericas6154 Russia loses 5 tanks/days 1500/years 😬 3000 since the beginin of the War!

@miguelpericas6154

2 ай бұрын

@@audonfred7487 nato Lost 300.000mill equal to 3000 su57 , they want to give another 100.000mill so would be equal to 4000 su57 o 100.000 tanks Lost 3000 tanks for make nato Lost the equal to 100.000 in money is great 😙

@audonfred7487

2 ай бұрын

@@miguelpericas6154 It's not a problem for Putin because he will be president of Russia for long Time. 😬

Half of them Russian figures would be pushing daisies by now

NATO does not have any nuclear weapons as an organization. However, some members have. Still a huge difference.

@HOTROD864

6 күн бұрын

NATO does have nukes your wrong

@anordman9659

6 күн бұрын

@@HOTROD864 Read my answer again. Some members of NATO have nuclear weapons but they are under national control. NATO as an organization only have one (1) military unit. The E3 Sentry (AWACS) in Geilenkirchen. Stop being an idiot and do some research.

@SteakDiane

2 күн бұрын

Uk, France have got nukes in Europe, America have given Germany and Italy nukes to store, America have got nuclear weapons in Europe at the many army bases they have.

@anordman9659

2 күн бұрын

@@SteakDiane again, all nukes belong to the nations. They are under national control. NATO has nothing to do with nukes. Learn some basic facts.

@anordman9659

2 күн бұрын

@@HOTROD864 nope, do some basic research before you write stupid stuff.

Canada’s contribution 2 jets when not in repair

@johnnolang3734

2 ай бұрын

Canada currently has 98 F/A-18 Hornets in service and 88 F-35s on order.

@craigharrison5406

2 ай бұрын

And some of the best snipers on the planet.

@dale5497

2 ай бұрын

Apparently, their contribution to the effort is night vision goggles. It's important to see your retreat clearly, even in the dark.

@craigharrison5406

Ай бұрын

Att he current rate it will take Russia 50 years to get to Kyiv. Russia would have you believe their economy is indestructible even after it collapsed only 30 years ago. History repeats itself.@@dale5497

@MrNohab

Ай бұрын

Canadian force is just farce!

You forgot to compare economic and financial potential of each.

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Знаете вы не поверите, но война ведëтся не деньгами, а оружием и жизнями граждан, а электричество получают не из розетки.

@sadeeshagunathilaka7199

Ай бұрын

@@user-sy5tr2zk4i yeah we saw it in ukrain war .uu guys sttil couldnt to catch it lol

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

​@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199?

It's all dependant on each sides dice roll.

States have to seat on a table and make serious conversations to stop this non sense wars in the world.

Sorry but that information about nuclear weapons is wrong.

ohhhh my, where are the russian trolls

@nledaig

2 ай бұрын

Laughing at your coping.

@john-toregundersen2655

2 ай бұрын

laughing at your non-coping@@nledaig

@nledaig

2 ай бұрын

Do your best Scandi. Keep up your support for grandaddies volunteering for the Eastern front. @@john-toregundersen2655

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Я здесь, о светлый эльф из Европейского Сада.

What's the name of the outro song?

I think these figures are out of date. Russia have less destroyers now and more submarines

Same komentarze "love rusia" "support ukaine" ani jednego "love earth love all people support each other" mam nadzieje ze kiedys ludzkosc sie zjednoczy i zamiast wydawac pieniądze na broń nowej generacji czołgi samoloty bedziemy dążyć do samodoskonalenia się by rozwijac nauke medycyne byśmy mogli kiedys opuscic nasza planete i znaleźć nową bo jak tak dalej pujdzie to ziemia stanie sie naszym grobem...

@qba4104

2 ай бұрын

Dopóki będziemy istotami biologicznymi to będziemy się zabijać bo rywalizacja leży w naszej naturze.

@mateo0608

2 ай бұрын

@@qba4104 rozumiem cie masz rację ale jesteśmy też istotami inteligentnymi nasze życie nie skupią się tylko na przetrwaniu jeść pić spać srać jak inne zwierzęta. Ludzie rywalizują ze sobą we wszystkim i dobrze dzięki temu nie "stoimy" w miejscu tylko się rozwijamy szkoda tylko że narody swiata głównie rywalizują wojskowo każdy się chwali zobaczcie mój czołg :P szkoda ze nie chwalą się np zobaczcie opracowaliśmy skuteczny lek na raka albo opracowalismy bardzo wydajne odnawialne i tanie źródło energii. Wiem fajnie się pisze takie moje małe marzenia;) trzymaj się kolego powodzenia

@SiArtTomaszBaranski

2 ай бұрын

@@mateo0608 Sprzeczne interesy pomiędzy państwami były zawsze i czasami doprowadzały do wojen. Przetrwanie i rozwój z założenia zależy od ekspansji, więc konflikty są nieuniknione. Nawet w teorii nie ma takiego scenariusza, w którym na całej Ziemi zapanuje pokój.

@user-qu8kg5zu3b

Ай бұрын

Лайков так мало и это плохо ,вы правы

@marcopolo7337

Ай бұрын

Il faut le dre à ce monstre de Poutine qui envoie par centaine de milliers des russes et autant d' ukrainiens dans la tombe . Ce type est un lâche sans une once d'humanité il faut se rappeler le Koursk .

My God, didn't know NATO had so much, where are they keeping it all?

@alpearson9158

2 ай бұрын

in the 32 countries although some are deployed in European countries seen as threatened by Putin creep

@papatango5085

2 ай бұрын

Usa

@mfc4987

2 ай бұрын

80% USA

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

This is "defensive" alliance - did you know that 🙂?

How to close comments on this?

iam not from Russia. but most of my good friends that i met was Russians and Ukrainian they are really good people to me. very nice. beautiful eyes and smile and happy to socialize with... from Philippines

@Vladimir.568

Ай бұрын

Thanks a lot

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Миру мир. Большой Привет из России!!!

The greatly detailed analysis of the nuclear situation is largely irrelevant because both sides know that a nuclear war would cause horrific destruction mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, but also affecting the Southern Hemisphere. This is a lose lose situation known as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD for short). As regards the Ukraine war NATO is only indirectly involved. Vladimir Putin knows your statistics, possibly better than you do, and apart from some threats has made no attempt to attack a NATO Nation. In fact Putin has woken NATO up. They had been slumbering and wondering if NATO was still needed or relevant. Now NATO has acquired two new members - Finland and Sweden.

@noasailing27feet

2 ай бұрын

Deagel forecast says minus 200 miljon people in the USA ? Big losses in Canada and here in Europe as well GB minus 70 % of it population ,vGermany minus 80 % of its population. Safest place from now is South America , Asia. Take care folks , i guessed all is planned long ago !!Time will show

@stever2583

2 ай бұрын

Only Germany is asleep... and apparently has yet to wake up!

@fluffyusa

2 ай бұрын

@@stever2583 they, the Germans are still drunk and will never wake up. NATO is a worthless organization though. NATO bombed Serbia, bombed Libya, bombed Afghanistan and what?

@GRUN_LEE

2 ай бұрын

Putin has been telling Nato for 24 years to stop expanding to the East. As a result, Nato reached Ukraine, and Russia started the war. NATO: You see, we said that Russia wants war.

@user-cn5ql7vt7q

Ай бұрын

нато раковая опухоль на земле,а англосаксы паразиты

Don't compare 1 nation with combined 31 nations such a funny comparison.

@WWRTheJudge

2 ай бұрын

True.

@jb-pn5oo

2 ай бұрын

​@WWRTheJudge the 31 nations combine as one nation called nato

@WWRTheJudge

2 ай бұрын

@@jb-pn5oo 🤦🏼 i know that

@alanrobertson9790

Ай бұрын

Isn't that the whole point of NATO?

@tommyhaynes9157

Ай бұрын

That's like walking unto Walmart and wondering why you aren't in Sears . If you want a different video then seek one out . This is about Russia vs NATO...if there's a war it will be between Russia and NATO . That's why it's appropriate to compare the military strengths of these two entities

I think we all know the only number that matters these days is budget

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Ну вообще то на цифры бюджета было бы не плохо смотреть через призму покупательной способности. А так же осознавать что воюют не деньгами, а оружием и жизнями граждан, и что электроэнергия не добывается из розетки.

Its not a question of power , nato’s problem is coordination between their nations

The kintetic power comparison is pointless in this age where man has mastered the power of the atom.

@jeffrood2626

2 ай бұрын

True. Very scary times…

@abrahamdozer6273

2 ай бұрын

Do you see any atom bombs being used nine years into this invasion?

@nicolasi1844

2 ай бұрын

How many atomic wars since WW2 vs how many conventional wars ? Conventional wars are prevalent.

@abrahamdozer6273

2 ай бұрын

@@nicolasi1844 Yes they are. You have to seriously wonder what the point of nuclear weapons is if they are essentailly unuseable.

@rlionheart8657

2 ай бұрын

There is a third time for everything. If it keeps going the way it has been we might see the third time very soon.@@nicolasi1844

I take it this is without the deductions made by Ukraine? The Russian boogyman has been shown to have paper body armour. Even the vaunted navy is being decimated by a country with no navy.

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Ну во первых надо осознать что Россия континентальная, а не морская держава. А во вторых вы правда верите что британские и американские морские дроны управляются украинцами, а потом прилетает ответка от России по расположению иностранных наёмников на Украине просто так.

Do most of these numbers need to be over 10 to be a huge problem?

Thanks!

50 countries formation to watch one country. That’s an embarrassment.

@korelly

2 ай бұрын

NATO is not formed of 50 countries

@yomama629

2 күн бұрын

The only embarrassment is that Russia's neighbors would rather be in NATO than to have anything to do with Russia

Thank you Mr putin for making N.A.T.O. Stronger 💪💪💪

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

What's to you from that? Like to your "taxes in action", or you love rising prices? What else that you've want to thank anyone? Extra spending on heating?

This is just an analysis! Actual war could be totally different at this era! Don't forget the atomic weapons

Esta comparacion no es real,porque quien dice que Rusia se enfrentaria sola a la OTAN?

У НАТО конечно красивые цифры всего, но когда в последний раз она воевала с достойным соперником? Может так оказаться, что все эти военные бюджеты раздуты, половина танков и самолетов настолько устарели, что не могут воевать. Ну и главное - солдаты. Люди изменились за последние 100 лет. Если для защиты своей родины они и готовы воевать ( и то не все), то отправляться за тысячу километров умирать за неизвестную страну вряд ли) а если еще и Трамп выведет США из НАТО, то организация станет бумажным тигром, которого никто не боится)

@Darth_Vader4.9

2 ай бұрын

А может оказаться что у НАТО все отлично с военной техникой и она у них новейшая. НАТО чисто в априори не может повоевать с достойным противником ведь такого не существует. А что касательно Трапма, то на твоём бы месте я не надеялся что Трамп выведет США из НАТО

@SergeyUstinenkov

2 ай бұрын

@@Darth_Vader4.9вот скоро и проверим, бумажный тигр НАТО или нет. пока что больше всех прибалтийские вымираты и гиена Европы воевать хотят)

@yomama629

2 күн бұрын

the only part of your comment that is remotely realistic is that Trump, being an agent of Russia, might try to pull the US out of NATO, although hopefully that would get him removed from office (and even more hopefully he will go to prison for his crimes before the election). NATO doctrine, warfighting capabilities, equipment, technology, etc. is simply unmatched on this planet and would godstomp Russia in biblical fashion

Can you please make NATO vs csto I subscribed

@user-ey5bb4ou9p

2 ай бұрын

CSTO is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Russia and other small nations. Indeed, Russia was not care about the territorial dispute in Armenia.

@abrahamdozer6273

2 ай бұрын

Six out of the ten largest economies on Earth are NATO countries. They mostly have voulnteer militarikes composed of professionals who have signed on for and trained for years using the most up-to-date military technlogy. CSTO is a motley collection of poor and weak Third World countries. They would have no chance unless they fight like the Taliban.

@tomasseman6388

2 ай бұрын

Central Asia countries are backyard of China now.

@MissiDamariss

2 ай бұрын

And what about 'Russia+China vs Nato' Comparison ?

@MissiDamariss

2 ай бұрын

@@user-ey5bb4ou9p But Nato is also is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Usa and other small nations. Indeed, Usa was not care about the territorial dispute between Greece and Turkey

Comparing the Combined Arms and resources of 32 Countries versus 1 .

After the seizure of the nuclear warhead storage facility, Prigozhin changed his mind about capturing Moscow. It turned out that Muscovy no longer has nuclear weapons .

@user-wv6eh7mh5u

2 ай бұрын

Нет такого государства Московия

None of this matters while the contents of a test tube could wipe out humanity as selected (including total).

Wären die Zahlen umgekehrt hätte das eine völlige resignation zur folge

apareceu nosso Tucano da Embraer, como " aeronave de treinamento "

The advantage is overwhelming

@zvonkovarda8682

2 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂

@u-1s2e3r4

2 ай бұрын

brutish brainwashed still believes Russian are losing in ukraine

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

So 🙂?

Nukes: I do not fear economy... economy fears me

Any comparison of NATO and Russian military "power" that does not include will to fight is incomplete and irrelevant.

Please make a similar study compared to China

Resumindo 😢 Já era Otan 😢😢 Melhor recuar

Respect NATO from Philippines

@LAV777.

Ай бұрын

Нужно пидором быть, чтобы нато уважать

Spain in 2024 pleise

@gilgameshomar

2 ай бұрын

its a midget not need to mention lol

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

"Pleise"? What's this?

What's the reason of military comparison,tanks, ships,planes etc as long as you talk about nuclear weapons? Everybody talks about them and ranting for the coalitions as they are normal weapons and whoever has the most will be the winner. Better stop imagine glory in a war like this. Everyone or almost everyone will die in this case. In a conventional war there is a clear NATO advantage.

Luuka evangeelium 17:Inimese Poja päevast 20 Aga kui variserid Jeesuselt küsisid, millal tuleb Jumala riik, siis vastas ta neile: „Jumala riik ei tule ettearvatavalt 21 ega öelda: „Ennäe, siin!” või „Seal!”, sest ennäe, Jumala riik on teie seas!” 22 Aga oma jüngritele ütles ta: „Päevad tulevad, mil te ihaldate näha üht Inimese Poja päevist, ja ei saa näha. 23 Siis öeldakse teile: „Ennäe, siin!” või „Ennäe, seal!” Ärge minge välja ja ärge jookske selle järele, 24 sest otsekui välk, mis taeva all välgatades sähvib ühest kohast teise, nõnda on Inimese Poeg oma päeval. 25 Kuid enne peab ta palju kannatama ja see sugupõlv tunnistab ta kõlbmatuks. 26 Ja just nõnda nagu sündis Noa päevil, nii on ka Inimese Poja päevil: 27 nad sõid, jõid, võtsid naisi ja läksid mehele selle päevani, mil Noa läks laeva ja tuli veeuputus ning hävitas nad kõik. 28 Nõndasamuti ka, nagu oli Loti päevil: nad sõid, jõid, ostsid, müüsid, istutasid, ehitasid hooneid, 29 aga sel päeval, mil Lott lahkus Soodomast, sadas taevast tuld ja väävlit ning hävitas nad kõik. 30 Otse niisamuti on sel päeval, mil Inimese Poeg ilmub. 31 Kes sel päeval on katusel ja ta asjad on majas, ärgu tulgu alla neid võtma, ja nõndasamuti see, kes on väljal, ärgu pöördugu tagasi! 32 Tuletage meelde Loti naist! 33 Kes iganes oma elu püüab hoida, kaotab selle, ja kes iganes selle kaotab, hoiab selle alles. 34 Ma ütlen teile, sel ööl on kaks ühes voodis - üks võetakse vastu ja teine jäetakse maha, 35 kaks naist jahvatavad üheskoos - üks võetakse vastu, teine jäetakse maha. 36 [Kaks (meest) on väljal - üks võetakse vastu ja teine jäetakse maha.]” 37 Ja nad kostsid: „Kus, Issand?” Aga tema ütles neile: „Kus korjus on, sinna kogunevad ka raisakotkad.”

This discrepancy is precisely why a war between the two powers is out of question. It would end in Armageddon and no one wins. Russia is not stupid, it won't surrender just for ecological or humanist reasons. That being said, those numbers are theoretical to say the least. There is strength on paper and strength on the field. And most importantly, there is military industrial production. NATO may seems mighty on paper, but seems to have difficulties to provide Ukraine with simple artillery shells and basic ammunitions. NATO has a great military budget, but has to pay three time the price for each tank, planes, missiles because it has to buy them to private capitalist companies. Russia military complex is state owned, it won't have to pay profit margins. Reality is that no European power has prepared itself for a long term war. The logistic and the industrial bases are not there. Europe lacks basic commodities while Russia has them all, the USA would be too far from the frontline to compensate, while Global South would revolt and cease deliver the commodities needed for Europe to sustain a war. And if by any luck, nukes are not used and Russia is really close to defeat, I bet China would intervene, annihilating the only the true advantages still has, that is the NAVY and Airforce. That some of our leaders are envisioning this possibility is beyond me. my 5 cents

@johnshaw8327

2 ай бұрын

Thanks for one of the few sensible comments.

@nledaig

2 ай бұрын

You are being real. The wee boys who are impressed by these vids are living in a fantasy world.

@papatango5085

2 ай бұрын

But you forget that the West have richest People in the world. Rotschild, rockefeller etc... If they want they can buy everything they want.

@johnnykruton1221

2 ай бұрын

So just let Putin and Xi do whatever they want? And the fat little dude in N. Korea. What do you propose? Please enlighten us with your wisdom.

@greenman8

2 ай бұрын

I'm not trying to saber rattle for the use of Nuclear weapons, or to diminish the gravity of Nukes, but Nukes do come in different sizes with different ways to detonate. It would still be scary to contemplate, but this is why different styles of Nuclear Weapons were shown. They are not all Hiroshima leveling style- big boys. The tactical nukes would be, well tactical. (still not a pleasant thought)

Russian firepower looked like it was 2021. Pre-war figures. Tank numbers for example.

@dallas1266

2 ай бұрын

Before war they had 10K tanks. Now they have 15K. It is their war econom. They did not lost a single tank and made 2,5K tanks per year. Trust me bro, Russian told me this :-)

@_.YouTubeBad_.

Ай бұрын

@@dallas1266 source: putins toilet paper

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

@@_.KZreadBad_. You read from his toilet paper? I'm almost sorry for ya... 😂

Hipersonic misil, avangarde, etc

@yomama629

2 күн бұрын

All vaporware which Russia claims to have yet failed to demonstrate capabilities of despite being locked in a total war with Ukraine

This should never become a scenario !!!!!! No one will win !!!!!!

All of which totally ignores the fact that the vast bulk of NATO's firepower exists in the USA and is not likely to be deployed in Europe as much of it will need to be held in reserve against the high probability of opportunistic conflict with China in the event of war in Europe. This completely changes the complexion of the whole scenario and NATO's chances of outmatching Russia in the field would be greatly reduced.

@pupinpupin9307

2 ай бұрын

This is one of the rare smart comments...spot on!

@lattekahvi1298

11 күн бұрын

on otherhand if there were a conflict between Russia and NATO, Russia would not have all of their troops in Europe either, otherwise China would totally go for cheeky landgrab

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

@@lattekahvi1298 If there will be conflict between Russia and NATO China will not "landgrab" Russia, but instead will join against NATO - that's it.

Yes, and it's still smaller than each of the top 4 european nato economies.

menuda fiesta y con suerte estaremos invitados en primera fila

А ТЕПЕРЬ ВОПРОС_ КТО НА КОГО НАПАДАЕТ?!"

17 aircraft carriers vs. 1 :D

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

Ну строго говоря у России нет авианосцев, а есть Авианесущий Крейсер. В чëм отличие Гугл в помощь.

@Stereozentrum

Ай бұрын

@@user-sy5tr2zk4i ENGLISH, do you speak it?

@user-sy5tr2zk4i

Ай бұрын

@@Stereozentrum Купи новый смартфон чтобы была возможность перевода, я английский не знаю.

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

@@Stereozentrum Dude tell's you to buy new phone with translation capabilty. MONEY, do you have it 🙂? He doesn't speak English, so? Are we all obliged to speak it, massa? Wait till you need to speak Chinese, you arrogant "ubermench"...

And what's the point of counting if atomic bombs arrive?)

il faut mettre les Alliés de la Russie la chine la corée du nord iran algérie inde le Brésil afrique du sud

Jespere que ca sera un beau combat dans tous les cas que le meilleur gagne. On approche de la fin des temps, autant que ca se finisse sur une guerre honorable, mais je pense que dans tous le cas ca se finira sur un match nul guerre nucleaire car la russie ne peut pas gagner sans nucleaire

What about hypersonic weapons?

@dennisbradley5620

2 ай бұрын

Not profitable for russia since what they are hitting with them is worth less than the missile. Kinda like how russia uses tanks to intercept drones worth a fraction of the tank

@AmskepticalTravelers-se8cr

2 ай бұрын

Russian Hypersonic weapons are not real, say its best buddy, CHINA. THEY SHOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE CGI WEAPONS SUCH AS THE SU-57. 10 SU-57 in 3 years. wow.

@papatango5085

2 ай бұрын

Never use and i think usa have secret weapons

And hypersonic missiles MHD ?

the biggest difference is that NATO is afraid and due to required political consensus - slow to react. That will cost us big time.

Mankind looses and the Earth wins. Thousend years after mankind, the human species was just a bad joke.

You do not have any idea about the power of India now. কিসের আন্তর্জাতিক কমিউনিটি ? ভারত আর চীনের জনসংখ্যা বাদ দিয়ে আন্তর্জাতিক মত হয় নাকি ?

@turk6882

2 ай бұрын

I don't know about China but India is a pile of garbage

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

West still think's in their arrogance that only they've are counts 🙂.

오 하느님, 제발 전쟁을 멈추게 인간을 회개하게 하소서🛐

@user-xt3sd5kf5c

Ай бұрын

Get out of here asian boy

I heard they have an excellent icebreaker.

Looks about even. Could go either way.

That's why Russia is all Talk .. they know the odds !!

@dennisrichards7994

2 ай бұрын

Crap on clown It is NATO that are all mouth !!!

@jonatikoisuva2695

2 ай бұрын

You can never compare Russia to a group of Nations. That is the dumbest and stupid thing to do. If Russia forms a military alliance with China,Iran and North Korea, NATO doesn't stand a chance 🫣

@ejnarbrochmann

2 ай бұрын

China will not just Look at NATO destroy Russia , so try to count in China .

@victorhopper6774

Ай бұрын

the ones that knew already fell out high windows

@dennisrichards7994

Ай бұрын

Actually the odds are in Russia's favour , do you really think that if these gutless countries that are in NATO decided to attack Russia that the rest of the world wouldn't side with Russia and come to their aid after all the appression, killing and theft that these European countries have done to them for the last well over 300 years , the sheer arrogance of the white man !!!

Many people support NATO, but for a country like Russia, even if it is the greatest, for us this is a lot compared to the whole of Europe and America gathered together

Nato vs China would be more interesting (and more relevant in case of Nato - Russia conflict)...

Couple a major factors here overlooked in favour of Russia as follows: 1. War in Europe Russias back yard, A) so navel minimal in war scenarios as seen in current Ukraine excepting subs. B) Supply is less of a challenge C) Russia self sufficient D) boarders China for supply 2. Russians are NOT weakened by woke, cancel culture, rights etc like we are (this is big factor the will to fight under terrible conditions) A) UK down. 30% of strength can man certain units, B) US, UK, Australia alleged former soldiers that have been part of Ukraine foreign legion died, half left as war was nothing like Afghan, Iraq etc due to shelling etc. 3. Russians have no challenges fielding soldiers that have a will to fight, see west threat as real (currently still getting volunteers) 4. Western - NATO struggle to unite cohesive force seen already in infighting in NATO Leadership- try putting that in real war footing when Russia is firing missiles and attacking 5. Putin has 87% of population behind - NO western leader has that - a lot of western countries are not behind their leaders, lm in Australia Albo will be voted out. Lot worse in EU and USA people don’t support this war we see the lies and propaganda- this is about money / corruption military industrial complex - Victoria Nulands lies and putting in pro USA Ukraine Govt (secret tapes) 6. Russia economy is doing well in war mode will nil deficit unlike US $134 trillion and EU not good either 7. China borders Russia 8. Geo politics- Israel and Gaza USA could not commit with China threat 9. USA and EU would not do well against China and Russia alliance that most probably would happen if NATO attacks Russia 10. EU has spent their arsenal and ammunition already, - Russian missiles better than west supersonic would take out attempt to build factories etc. 11. Western countries have a lot of domestic challenges- USA Border security, Germany Deindustrialisation, France - internal strife. Etc As an Australian taking the emotion out and looking at a snap shot of the world conflicts and geo political landscape- NATO is in no position to take on Russia today. So in short my money is on Russia as EU forces are in not condition nor are its societies that are culturally divided lacking in places culture identity. Sooner the west wakes up the better.

@x1d2

2 ай бұрын

Very interesting the way you have drafted as per the R&D you have done. Just a question from my end, do you think an Asian military alliance similar to that of NATO happening in the near future. When I say an Asian military alliance, you can exclude Japan & South Korea or maybe few more members. Does it balance ⚖️ to NATO.

@RareSense

2 ай бұрын

@@x1d2 great question, l would say there is a high probability that BRICS will expand to include more Asian countries. This is more so given US aggression and posturing towards China and then the poor history of USA actions across world changing regime to suit US agenda ie:Ukraine but also examples specifically in Asia. I think given BRICS and their different approach especially by superpowers Russia and China given voice and genuine respect to smaller members to prosper to drive success of BRICS that unlike US and NATO that funnels to elites ie: Ukraine and forever wars are a life support to USA economy to prolong the inevitable crash and decline as an example. BRICS Example of respectful approach can be seen by Putin with African leaders without bullying them is a very different approach that appears too be working. I think it is telling when you hear from people on the ground from USA to Russian experiences it’s quite different to current Propaganda in West. Further US and CIA can no longer control media narrative due to current nature of social media where Victoria Nuland and USA skulduggery is exposed. So short answer is yes, l believe it will not only counter but surpass NATO [NOTING - that seriously NATO needs to be disbanded as it is terribly tainted, and has no real high value proposition given original creation / remit against communism of USSR that ceased to exist some time ago now! Further getting rid of NATO is only real way for forward restore and preserve peace going forward. Also given that Russia, India and China resources and communities with strong cultural identity with out the woke and cancel culture I believe will be infinitely stronger than West (as much as it pains me). The great mistake l think history will judge USA is on disastrous decisions around Ukraine especially the actions that firmly pushed Russia and China together, instead the USA should have aligned with Russia not fight her. NATO IS BAD NEWS.

@helenaczekanska3513

2 ай бұрын

👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

@RareSense

2 ай бұрын

@@x1d2 No l don’t think that will happen however, it may default into BRICS as collectively transitions to monetary system and l foresee a strong uptake as Putin and Xi approach is totally different where they do not dictate or bully but respect their members as it underpins group success. I was impressed with how clever Putin dealt with the African Leaders a class act not telling but proposing and negotiating not through sanction or bulking like USA. So can realistically see power shift.

@papatango5085

2 ай бұрын

China need more european and american market. They don t want world war. And you think Russia is rich but they are like spain in réality

Respect NATO from South Korea 🇰🇷🤝🇪🇺🇺🇸

@mrtmrthje

2 ай бұрын

NATOOOOO ❤️❤️❤️💪💪💪💪

@Basalt533

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@selimmolla1670

2 ай бұрын

Hate NATO. Love The Great RUSSIA♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

@ibrahim.ky_159

2 ай бұрын

🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵

@HeavenAngel1526

2 ай бұрын

​@@ibrahim.ky_159🟩🌞🟩🏳️‍🌈

One drawback is NATO has many leaders and to moblise would be a bureaucratic nightmare. I can only imagine the red tape to actually get anything done.

Counting total numbers is misleading. This does not take into account the difficulty of the logistics. For instance if Putin (or his successor) decided to annexe one or more of the Baltic states how long would it take for NATO to transport several armoured brigades into the region ? Russian forces could probably take the country in 48 hours. NATO needs a rapid reaction force at constant readiness comprised of airmobile armour, antitank units and attack helicopters that can be quickly put into each or any of the NATO countries bordering Russia.

cuando son mas de 20 paises vs 1, y aun asi Rusia los iguala y supera en algunos rubros.

@mfc4987

2 ай бұрын

La Russie à la taille de 100 pays , dans l'otan le luxé comme par exemple,la Belgique,les Pays-Bas,les petits pays des balkan, et des pays baltes donc normal

@timur3505

11 күн бұрын

@@mfc4987 So, it's territory that matters, in your opinion 🙂? The population of Russia is at least 6 times smaller.

Эти сопоставления обычных вооружений НАТО и России показывают, что НАТО превосходит по многим позициям. Но характер современной войны сделает эти преимущества ничтожными. Тк при агрессии против России, Россия будет сметать с лица Земли целые страны.

@sergiubargan2970

2 ай бұрын

Такой исход равно конца света , если начнут ядерной оружии стрелять то пиздец всем и всего мира будет а не только некоторым странам ( даже если только тактических пустят) исход можно будет приравнять Апокалипсиса и для России в том числе, по мне это не произойдет (период Ковид) и обязанности ходить в масках всему миру и была самая большая вероятность ядерной угрозы, моя личное субъективное мнение что стороны договорились воевать в классику кто лучше тому и лавры ...

@markusweber893

2 ай бұрын

We have to keep peace. Otherwise human mankind will be destroyed. No winners!