Thanks for the opportunity man, I really appreciate💪🏾

@minhhieu7658

Ай бұрын

I really appreciate your thought process, too!

@creatingonthemargins1089

Ай бұрын

I am impressed by the sportsmanship in this series

@jonatan01i

Ай бұрын

Too bad the internet issue with wasting time on your part after you made your move happened multiple times.

@NJDJ1986

Ай бұрын

What happened man, why you lost on time?

@user-rh6dw9dg4s

Ай бұрын

@@NJDJ1986Do you have a mental deficiency?

REMATCH, REMATCH, REMATCH

20:41 Proudest moment😂😂😂

@QDWhite

Ай бұрын

I personally admired 44:53 the most. Fearless.

@RandomGuyOnYoutube601

Ай бұрын

Qb3 was a good move, otherwise the position would be pretty gruesome, but is there something wrong with black responding Rb8 Qc3 or Qd3, Bxf3 Nxf3, Nxf3 Qxf3, Bxc1 Rxc1 and Rxb2 winning a pawn?

@justinjja2

Ай бұрын

It was at that moment I realized you were far better than me. Starlink?

@absolutesonic4266

Ай бұрын

​@@RandomGuyOnKZread601not as far as I can see, well spotted. It might be better to play Nxf3 instead because if Bxf3 the sequence could go: Rb8 Qc3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nxf3 gxf3 and if Bxc1 there's Rxc1 piling pressure on the c-file's weak pawns. However, if Nxf3 first Black keeps the bishop pair after gxf3 and can play Bd7 defending c6 and having opened the king. Wait no, I just realized after Rb8 Qc3 Bxf3 Nxf3 Nxf3 Qxf3 Bxc1 Rxc1 Rxb2 there's Rxc6 I think☠️☠️

@RandomGuyOnYoutube601

Ай бұрын

@@absolutesonic4266 Oh, yeah... Might be as I remember it. I am not going back to the video.

He is somehow underrated because of his internet connection.

The difference between 2000 and 2200: The 2200 can buy better internet connection

@Idiot_Indians

Ай бұрын

Difference between USA and Nigeria.

@tianlecheng2656

Ай бұрын

The 2200 can get an extra N and an extra M in their name

@milaanvigraham8664

Ай бұрын

​@@Idiot_IndiansThey have smart people though it seems. Bad governance really ruins these countries :(

I loved this video. I will try to express why: One - its not clickbaity, its not about Magnus or other chess personality. Two - it gives us insight on how you both calculate, how you decide between different moves which all seem good to me. Three- the fact that both players recorded and you edited and show both sides is great. Its like watching a game with comentary, but not from outsiders but the players themselves. So im just liking and subscribing

I play a lot on mobile data and that “I made my move whys my time going down” is so painful and relatable 😣

@yomanyomandx5609

Ай бұрын

Fax 💩

@boity-fromthemilkygalaxy2504

Ай бұрын

Bro 😭😭😭

I would like to see a rematch Was a interesting video for sure

The common opinion here is a rematch!

This one deserves a rematch for sure 👏

I’m calling for a rematch or another match against a 1750+ player. On the recaps if we can display the bar that shows who is winning too. Great game by both. Nelson I thought you were for sure finished down so much time and the fight you showed pivoting to quicker plays was incredible.

We need more of this, very instructive!

I enjoy this kind of videos a lot, keep going !!

love this videos, keep them going!

Nooo F in the chat for the internet connection, rematch?

It felt like he was terrified since the start, had he played with confidence the game could have been much more challenging. It was still interesting though...being a 1700 myself i could see the flaws in my thought process. Thanks for such amazing content Nelson. ❤❤

@DanielSong39

Ай бұрын

Nah the game was far from over I think there will be a rematch

I really enjoyed hearing him think out cojunter attacks to your attacks. Really helpful to watch. IMHO do more of these with Goodnight chess.

Really enjoyed the commentary on both sides

we need more videos like this ❤❤

Cool video seeing both peoples thought process during a game

Love your videos

200 points.

@GoodKnightChess

Ай бұрын

😂😂

@tianlecheng2656

Ай бұрын

275

I love your this type of videos to watch😅

I hope you both come back to this when you can. Would really like to see you 2 analyze this one.

Awesome move by move thought process!!!

Meet again and play out the last position before the disconnection. It was a really nice game and the game could have went either way

@zzzaphod8507

Ай бұрын

In theory, but Nelson already gave away some things he was planning to do next, and either player could've looked at an engine to see the best moves to continue.

such a good game, thank you both for good chess content! ... despite the surprise ending

Good game. Would have liked to see it play out. But more than that, I would love to see a game where an opponent actually attacks rather than defends the entire game.

So unfortunate with the connection and (partially resulting) time problems. Would be awesome to see a rematch one day if you both are up for it! :)

At 16:10 I was thinking knight h4 then queen d7, sac the bishop to h3, when pawn takes take back the pawn with the queen, threatening mate with the next move being queen to d2. Makes it very hard for white to deal with and coordinate a response, they would have to see the attack right at the bishop sac or it would be too late. All of his pieces are on the other side of the board undeveloped. Wonder what you think about this idea

Play unranked and set that position up with similar time when good knight has a better connection, very entertaining game

I was rooting for both of you so the outcome works for me. I almost jumped up when he went ahead with the queen sacrifice. The whole time I was like, "do it, do it, do it "

OK this is a really tough opponent Nelson loses ~15-20% of the time against this rating range

i've already made my move ... famous last words

Such an anticlimax 😢

Good game, i wish the internet didn't fail to see the outcome. I would've taken the exchange with the queen as well.

Rematch Nelson

I wonder why Nelson didn’t consider …Bb4 instead of …Bg5. It’s a better version of the same idea, in that it not only attacks the knight on d2 but pins it to the rook on e1. Thus, for instance, White’s response in the game (Qb3) is unavailable because Black takes on f3 (probably with the bishop) and the d2 knight can’t recapture due to the pin. Weird blind spot? Edit: just saw that Nelson covered this in the postgame review.

Yo guys what do you think would happen if when queen qb3 -> f6 ?

Whats the difference between a 2100 and a 2200? 🤔 I have heard that from 2000 and 2200 is a major gap. However, I do not hear much about 2100 to 2200 in chess. Anyways, this video is great and I learned a lot; this will help with my OTB games too!

@danielward7008

Ай бұрын

There's very little difference between a 2100 and a 2200 truth be told, and this guy is probably underrated because of his connection issues. The only major difference is between the top elite level and the rest. I believe that anyone can reach Nelson's level with diligent study.

@xDeathxBirdx

Ай бұрын

@@danielward7008 fax

Great, level game. Too bad about the bad connection.

ruy lopez against lopez xD

Aww that was unfortunate, Goodknight Chess lost on time, the game would have kept going if he didnt run out of time!

@DanielSong39

Ай бұрын

In an E-sport, equipment failure is absolutely part of the sport but a tough way to go out

hell yeah

Next time no time limit so you can finish the game and take the time to explain the moves from both perspectives

@maximos905

Ай бұрын

That would be like a 2 hr video

At 41 minutes, white has knight takes d5

My goat!!!

Nice game, both sides.

Love to see 2100 Vs 2200 because I'm 2100 and it would be very cool or maybe 2400 vs 2200

@DanielSong39

Ай бұрын

You get to see the 2400 vs 2200 in Titled Tuesday, Nelson got killed

@yomanyomandx5609

Ай бұрын

​@@DanielSong39where I can watch

@DanielSong39

Ай бұрын

@@yomanyomandx5609Once in a while Nelson does a KZread livestream for Titled Tuesday

46:25 Third world problem? (several times?)

@FuturePast2019

Ай бұрын

The Difference Between ....

Im 1900, and I want to challenge you. But only if I am in my mental equilibrium since I am careless when im not in my mental equilibrium

@absolutesonic4266

Ай бұрын

I'm 1700 and I'd like to play a rapid game against you sometime so I can improve. Would you mind adding me so we could play a game? (AbsoluteChess72)

@BABYDORAMIGD

Ай бұрын

@@absolutesonic4266 ey bro. I dropped from 2040 to 1850 so we are in the same level. And heres some advice. Act like you are Magnus Carlsen. Commentate by yourself, yeah literally. Like you are a streamer. To improve. If you lose 2 games. DONT RAGE AND KEEP CALM. THOUGH EASIER SAID THAN DONE. Analyze them. If you blundered or if you missed a win. That does not mean you are terrible. That means you are not *Focused* My username Is Mellocrackowed fyi

rematch

Can you play a game with Gotham chess?

More of this yes yes

I wanna play you bro I'm 840 elo

@TheSpider2674

Ай бұрын

Me to I'm 9points higher tho

@tianlecheng2656

Ай бұрын

I’m 550 points higher.

@TheSpider2674

Ай бұрын

@@tianlecheng2656 I'm now 49 point higher

🎉🎉🎉

I like cold milk.

@Howtohim

Ай бұрын

I like warm milk

notification gang

First 🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🥇🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆😅😅

I'm puzzled how persistent is the goal for settling pawns in the center of the board. Literally every game revolves around such aim, as if pawns were to deliver checkmate. Tired of this pointless approach, so discouraging at fueling some interest for the game.

@GoodKnightChess

Ай бұрын

Having a strong center means more space, more space means more piece mobility, more piece mobility means chances for an attack and a chance to seize the initiative and call the shots i.e your opponent would have to respond to your moves as opposed to making their having time for their own plans and trying to execute them. Of course the opponent isn't just going to sit back and let you get all that hence the struggle which sometimes clouds the benefits of having a strong center. But if you were to see a game between a strong opponent and a much lower rated one who has no idea why they should fight for the center or how to go about it, most of the things I mentioned above would be demonstrated clearly.

@lingtao969

Ай бұрын

try playing a game against a strong opponent without trying to control the center with pawns or pieces at some point; you will get crushed.

@enderyu

Ай бұрын

Your argument is like saying that players should be less materialistic and stop caring about the "arbitrary" point system (3 points for bishops, knights, etc.), since chess is about checkmate and not points. But the argument often falls flat since sacrificing a queen for 2 minor pieces will most often give you more limited options and less chances to win the game. Even if chess principles are not written in the rules, they arise naturally and have to be understood to master the game

@jaideepshekhar4621

Ай бұрын

Try it. :)

@Thatoneguy-12

Ай бұрын

It does kinda suck and take away from some of the creativity of the game, but if you don’t do it your opponent will forcing the game to always go a certain way. There still is a lot of room for interesting and fun middle games with a lot of tactics and free thinking strategy. “Opening studies” has partially ruined the game though

@chessvlogger