"But Testify, you can't just assume the New Testament is reliable. Muslims say it's corrupted!" A.) I didn't just assume anything. I gave solid reasons to trust that Jesus really predicted his death and resurrection accurately. B.) Guys, my channel is like one big, ongoing series. Every video builds on the last. I've got a ton of reasons why you can trust the text. Check out my playlists on undesigned coincidences and how history backs the Bible to get all the details.

@The_Autistic_Christian

3 күн бұрын

You can't "assume." What you can do is build an airtight case using solid evidence to show that it hasn't been. Which is what you've been doing in video after video. If they don't want to see the evidence that the text of the New Testament is 99.5% certain and corroborated by multiple evidences, both internal and external, that's on them. But they can't cry to you that there's no evidence when you've been laying it out week after week.

@maleknaser3267

3 күн бұрын

Saying that quran is false by giving verses that jesus predicte his death from scriptures that we do not even know exactly who wrote it except mensioning thier names is wild + wrote it after long time of jesus death. If you want to say the quran is false bring contradiction or somthing false in it not using unknown scriptures to say the quran is false !!

@arafatmarius331

3 күн бұрын

Ok my boy he is a funny dilemma if we take Danial as a profet he explained what dose Jesus mean by the temple getting Distoryed and reconstructed after 3 days The temple of Solomon was distroyed by Romans then Constantin after 2 centuries took power and guess what after another 4-5 centuries the Muslims Rebuild Al aksa Moske If we took 3 days as literal will contradict the message being at a sens of unknown.

@user-yu2sq2pv2o

3 күн бұрын

@maleknaser3267 the evidence points to the scriptures being written by who they say they were, atleast the Gospels. Also the Quran says that the Bible atleast used to be the infallible word of Allah, but it got corrupted. The problem is that we have really old copies of the Bible and they all match the Bible we have now.

@maleknaser3267

3 күн бұрын

@@user-yu2sq2pv2o there is no any proof for what you say. Give me evidance do not tell me we had old copes and that is it.

Islam is definitely the biggest "Trust me bro" in history when it comes to thism

@Nguyenzander

3 күн бұрын

bro just copied the top comment from last video

@TacoTuesday4

3 күн бұрын

@@Nguyenzander Doesn't change that it is still a true statement.

@harrywitney3501

3 күн бұрын

Not even just this, Muhammad came over 500 years after Jesus and then feels he is credible to talk about Jesus' life. I think i'll believe the apostles who were actually with Jesus and saw him die on the cross and rise again 3 days later, not some random guy (Muhammad) not even mentioned in the Bible who did some awful things. Islam's 'god' and the true living God of the Bible are not the same btw. Jesus is the only way to the Father, there is no other way. Do not reject Jesus, place your faith in Him.

@Nguyenzander

3 күн бұрын

@@TacoTuesday4 he still copied it. If you made, say a painting, and I copied it and got a lot of money from it, wouldn’t you be mad? Wouldn’t other people who didn’t know it was copied be mad because they paid to see stolen artwork? It’s still good art, but is nonetheless stolen. Likewise the comment is still truth, but stolen.

@LOTHBROKE12

3 күн бұрын

@@harrywitney3501 Amen bro, though I gotta say that Muslims have been real quiet since this video dropped.

Christians: Jesus died by crucification Jews: he died by crucification but wasn't God Romans: we crucified him under pontius pilate Muslims over 600 years later: some overly elaborate conspiracy theory that makes no sense

@LOTHBROKE12

3 күн бұрын

Truth

@lucasduran5400

3 күн бұрын

Jesus was not killed he lay HIS LIFE

@alfieingrouille1528

3 күн бұрын

Yep kinda?

@desmonides

3 күн бұрын

Revelations 2:9/3:9 Deuteronomy 28

@user-lk9zj8pp1e

3 күн бұрын

A way.

Without lies, islam DIES

@davepugh2519

3 күн бұрын

Same goes for all religion.

@axxel9626

3 күн бұрын

​@@davepugh2519 not for Jesus, the only true living God✝️

@annemurphy9339

3 күн бұрын

@@davepugh2519. Archaeological discoveries consistently support the biblical narrative of people, places, and events.

@thefogitself

3 күн бұрын

@@annemurphy9339 really?

@iodias

3 күн бұрын

@@thefogitself yes

The Quran is a fan fic that turned canon for 2 billion people

@Playing096

2 күн бұрын

Fan fic after the original Work 500 years after was written

@djender5839

2 күн бұрын

2 bilion

@inconsideratebox3000

2 күн бұрын

This is such a ridiculously accurate comparison. Islam is Christianity except Muhammad is the storyteller and self-inserted himself as God _(or Allah in his case)._ Since Muhammad was a very, very flawed and worldly man, the Quran ended up becoming a really shitty, highly contradictory retelling of the Bible that's everything nonbelievers claim the actual Bible itself is.

@autaum6536

2 күн бұрын

it's the dumbest thing ever written...

@LiberatedMind1

2 күн бұрын

And Christianity is the same 😆

The denial of the historical crucifixion is one of the main reasons why I reject Islam. It's indefensible.

@danielromani2964

3 күн бұрын

I 100% agree. Jesus is King. The only issue this video presents is Testify forgot to show why using the Bible is valid in those situations. Surah 3:3-4, Surah 7:157, and so on. Because I guarantee you some Muslims are going to claim that this video has no validity due to it using Bible references for the catch 22. Which is dismissed by the Quran claiming the Gospels as correct and in the present tense, but still there is bound to be some…

@abdoume1406

3 күн бұрын

​@@danielromani2964the thing is you weren't there. Allah (god ) was, so he testified, as he calls himself in the quran a sufficient witness

@abdoume1406

3 күн бұрын

​@@danielromani2964so to say that this is the reason why you reject islam is false You should read the message of allah the quran, if you believe in it and belive that its from god, then everything god said must be true

@danielromani2964

3 күн бұрын

@@abdoume1406 that is literally blind faith, buddy. You have no proof whatsoever that the Quran is in fact the word of Allah. You have no proof that it is telling the truth. You only have what is written in it, and it is written that the Gospels and Torah are previous revelations from Allah. Therefore, according to the Quran, what they claim is accurate, so that means Jesus claimed to be God and was crucified. Your point holds no logic, it’s like me saying Jesus is God just cause the Bible is the Word of God. That means it has to be true, no other thinking or historical evidence provided

@danielromani2964

3 күн бұрын

@@abdoume1406 also, I have looked into the Quran. I’ve found so many contradictions, immoral teachings, and self-reliant claims I have completely shelved it as mythology, NOT religion. Because unlike you, I choose not to be gullible and to analyze both moral teachings AND historical reliability. Muhammad and the Quran are not reliable in the subjects they talk about, and therefore make too many self-reliant historical claims with no historical or literary evidence to back them up. Believing something to be true doesn’t magically make it true

I remember the bible warning to beware of false prophets

@unclerukmer

Күн бұрын

Jesus is pretty clear about it.

@trafalgarq805

Күн бұрын

"But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!" - Galatians 1:8, Muslims believe the Angel Gabriel gave Muhammad the words of the Quran

@ardarctica

Күн бұрын

@@trafalgarq805 i'm not a christian but pretty sure that's just one of muhammad's many schizo sessions

@GolAcheron-fc4ug

Күн бұрын

@@trafalgarq805 pretty sure Muhammad described him as an angel of light, correct me if i’m wrong. Isn’t that exactly the description of satan when he tries to deceive humans from his true identity?

@mustafam.leathercoatv.2514

23 сағат бұрын

I remember the quran warning to not consider Allah as an entity that looks like humans , marry their women, and being a father and son turning an abrahamic religion into a polytheistic pagan one

Why should anyone believe Allah when the Quran calls him "the best of deceivers" multiple times?

@Orthosaur7532

3 күн бұрын

Because they want 72 virgins

@The_Prog_Rocker

3 күн бұрын

Note that the bible goes the opposite direction and calls Satan the Father of Lies. Coincidence?

@tarjan68

3 күн бұрын

It makes no sense.

@dayana4654

3 күн бұрын

But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! (Galatians 1 : 8) And what'd ya know, 600 years later suddenly an angel appears to a wild man in a cave, telling that you're the chosen one and that the actual witness accounts and a book that was made 100 years after Jesus (100 is closer to Jesus times than 600) is wrong... hmmm and its crazy how those people still claim their book that was written by a self-proclaimed by an angel wild cave human to conquest by sword, and blood other nations and saying that the gospels that talk about love, loving each other, helping each other, peace, and actual witness testimony to be false... yeah nothing "wrong" here. I thank God everytime for making my mind clear, and that He protected me from these lies, I had my doubts about God, at one point even dare think that He isn't real, but even when I had doubt He stayed and held my hand, and showed me the way to life, and moved my feet away from the path that leads to death. God is the loving Shepherd and He continues to protect and lead His people.

@axxel9626

3 күн бұрын

​@@dayana4654 the earliest gospel, that of Mark, was written around the 60s, and the other two synoptics before the 64 b.c. The earliest letters of Paul were written around the 50s.

John-Jesus was crucified, I was there to see it. Mohammed-Nah he wasn’t, trust me bro

@MitsukiHashiba

Күн бұрын

Allah: 🐍 ps... ps... ps.. pzzzzz....

@rishispewcack5745

Күн бұрын

The only evidence of John is from the buybull. NOT a reliable account.

@kashmirandal6282

Күн бұрын

Yeah, it's crazy that other people believe. How do you know the information you got directly came from God? I'd trust a man who actually saw it with his eyes.

@elzoz1O20

Күн бұрын

Give me the full biography of john , tell me his full name , his full story of how he met jesus , your evidence that he saw him . Me personally ? I can give you everything you want about Muhammad (pbuh), and he isn’t the one that said he wasn’t crucified anyways.

@elzoz1O20

Күн бұрын

@@kashmirandal6282”i’d believe a man but not god”

Notice how in the 10 commandments it says to not bear false witness? Which is an interesting way to say to not lie but the “Jesus was replaced on the cross” is the literal definition of false witnessing

“Through a hole in the roof” is such a typical kind of thing to say for Christianity spin-off religions.

@danmosby7980

2 күн бұрын

Was the hole real or just an appearance. who repaired the hole, tell me more about the hole.

@MrSquirrelboy

2 күн бұрын

The story in the Koran sounds like bad fan fiction. They can believe whatever they want.

@haytamhaytam7227

Күн бұрын

@@MrSquirrelboy kinda ironic how you believed what has been said in this video with 0 source. must be reliable.

@valinorean4816

20 сағат бұрын

Alright, let's say Jesus was on the cross but he was under an invincibility spell, so that it only looked like they killed him but they didn't (miraculous swoon theory), later he recovered, magically healed himself completely (Islam acknowledges he could do this) and came to the disciples, and they misunderstood this as him resurrecting from the head. Note how in the doubting Thomas episode he emphasizes that he was on the cross, but never says that he died. This is consistent with the Quran. (The story about a hole in the roof is not from Muhammad.)

@woodkey1

13 сағат бұрын

@@valinorean4816 that is the problem with islam. Believing in spells and magic. Jesus perform miracles. He was dead for 3 days. Joseph and Nicodemus carried his body after the crucifixion and brought myrrh and spices and bound his body with linen. Get yourself educated. The centurion even speared Jesus body to make sure he was dead. How daft can you be.

“If anyone preaches to another gospel, other than the one we’ve preached to you, let them be accursed!”

@valinorean4816

20 сағат бұрын

Alright, let's say Jesus was on the cross but he was under an invincibility spell, so that it only looked like they killed him but they didn't (miraculous swoon theory), later he recovered, magically healed himself completely (Islam acknowledges he could do this) and came to the disciples, and they misunderstood this as him resurrecting from the head. Note how in the doubting Thomas episode he emphasizes that he was on the cross, but never says that he died. This is consistent with the Quran. (The story about a hole in the roof is not from Muhammad.)

@BookerFakeToughGuy

10 сағат бұрын

​@@valinorean4816 😆

@eyuelzero

2 сағат бұрын

@@valinorean4816 why would the disciples bury a not-dead man? Even better: why would he be crucified only to not die?

Islam has gotta be the best combination of ancient Christian heresy and polytheistic animism

@Vincenzo-wn1or

3 сағат бұрын

Sprinkled with large doses of demonic oppression

If anyone thinks one of the disciples would have volunteered to be crucified before the resurrection they need to read the gospels again. Either that or they've never witnessed a crucifixion. We don't pretend the writers of our sacred texts were perfect.

@user-jy6hd9uw8h

3 күн бұрын

But... But... I thought the cross was a chocolate candy...

@KopperNeoman

3 күн бұрын

Not that it would have mattered. They weren't God, so their blood couldn't save us all.

@ggpt9641

3 күн бұрын

Yes. And even if they were as selfless as Jesus was to decide to save Jesus's life, why was their name not mentioned? Even if Jesus didn't testify who that disciple was, why would none of the other 10-11 disciples say who died for Jesus? Mary is remembered for her offering of ointment unto Jesus, Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus are remembered for burying him in a tomb, but you're telling me that the disciple who offered to be crucified to save Jesus goes unnamed? Something critical missing there.

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@HeresyInquisitor

3 күн бұрын

@@ggpt9641there’s nothing “missing” there’s no historical evidence of a “unnamed” disciple volunteering to be crucified in christs stead, no Apostle teaches this, no church tradition implies this, it’s just a bunch of “trust me bro” mumbo jumbo that requires no proof since it proves itself in the eyes of Muslims.

The fact that they think the disciples were Muslim without that even existing yet for another at least 100 years, is insane. 😂

@victuss1413

3 күн бұрын

500 ish years. Muhammed was about 600 ad. It's even more cringe

@Christians_believe

3 күн бұрын

@@victuss1413 fr though lol

@user-hc8kv6gk3h

3 күн бұрын

They say Jesus i muslim, but Jesus drank wine...thats not very halal

@KingoftheJuice18

3 күн бұрын

Dear fellow theist, you should probably be a little more cautious in issuing this judgment. Christians see appearances of Jesus in Israelite Scripture over a 1000 years before Jesus lived.

@oldol12

3 күн бұрын

What's even more insane, is that women would follow a "religion", which states that most of the people in Hell are women because they are stupid and that they should veil themselves, so that men won't be tempted to r*pe them. Insanity!

It’s always fascinating that people believe a document 500 years later of the act before a contemporary eyewitness account

@jesusisunstoppable4438

3 күн бұрын

623 years later. Not 500. But yeah you're correct.

@oscaralegre3683

3 күн бұрын

thinking is forbidden in islam.

@davepugh2519

3 күн бұрын

The gospel writers were not eyewitnesses

@oscaralegre3683

3 күн бұрын

@@davepugh2519 yes. Matthew and John were...now, Muhamad the pedo, was definitely not an eyewhitness 😂😂😂.

@dylanbonilla3683

3 күн бұрын

They were in fact​@@davepugh2519

I heard one Sheik say it was clear that Jesus did die but that Allah resurrected Him and thats what the Quran meant. He got in a lot of trouble for saying that

@thegiantbeagle

3 күн бұрын

John 3:16-17 “For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten Son so who so ever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world but to save the world through him.” God bless you Jesus loves you.

@DaveGIS123

3 күн бұрын

Here's part of what the prophet Isaiah said about the Messiah: "Yet it was the Lord’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer, and though the Lord makes his life an offering for sin, he will see his offspring and prolong his days, and the will of the Lord will prosper in his hand. After he has suffered, he will see the light of life and be satisfied; by his knowledge my righteous servant will justify many, and he will bear their iniquities." (Isaiah 53: 10-11, NIV). In other words, Isaiah said G-d Himself would treat the Messiah's death as a sin offering (which is why Jesus' crucifixion is often called a 'sacrifice'). The same passage says the Messiah would be raised back to life and be highly rewarded --- He would see the light of life and be 'satisfied'. The Messiah's sin offering would be on behalf of His figurative offspring (i.e. believers) to pay the price for their sins (i.e. bear their iniqities). This was written by Isaiah about 600BCE, or 1200 years before the creation of the Quran.

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@thesaltedegg3786

3 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512taking things out of context without understanding

@dhkim3986

3 күн бұрын

🤣

This would mean Allah invented Christianity and didn’t fix his mistake until 600 years later

@kashmirandal6282

3 күн бұрын

This would also mean that around 500 years worth of people died being "misled". That is a fake god because he made mistakes. The real God is ✝✝

@scalycoronet5198

3 күн бұрын

Yeah he was pretty involved in making sure people did the right thing throughout the entirety of the Bible. The idea that the disciples got all of the teachings wrong, or even worse that God got it wrong, and then just didn’t change anything for 600 years is ridiculous. And the idea that God would “fix” his “mistake” by telling some random dude in a cave to go create a religion that is fundamentally the completel opposite of everything he taught before? That’s just so completely ridiculous.

@red.40

3 күн бұрын

@@scalycoronet5198 you know nothing about the Quran if you think it teaches the complete opposite of what was taught before. Not even your own scholars would agree with this claim

@Intuitoh

3 күн бұрын

@@red.40 The Quran doesn't think Jesus is the son of God, it talks about how the Bible is "corrupted" and Jesus was not crucified, and didn't rise up from the dead 3 days later. That goes against core Christian teachings, the only thing that doesn't make it so that Islam is teaching completely opposite stuff, is that it says Jesus is the Messiah. Other than that though, Islam is (almost) completely opposite of what Jesus taught.

@kashmirandal6282

3 күн бұрын

@@scalycoronet5198 Don't forget that in the 6 centuries that he refused to fix his mistake, so many people died and got cast down following the "wrong God". That's a ton of people.

The biggest "it's just a prank bro" from the Devil

@valinorean4816

20 сағат бұрын

Alright, let's say Jesus was on the cross but he was under an invincibility spell, so that it only looked like they killed him but they didn't (miraculous swoon theory), later he recovered, magically healed himself completely (Islam acknowledges he could do this) and came to the disciples, and they misunderstood this as him resurrecting from the head. Note how in the doubting Thomas episode he emphasizes that he was on the cross, but never says that he died. This is consistent with the Quran. (The story about a hole in the roof is not from Muhammad.)

@voxpopuli8132

4 сағат бұрын

@@valinorean4816 Jesus told the disciples many times: " The Son of Man will be KILLED, but he will rise on the third day".

@valinorean4816

3 сағат бұрын

@@voxpopuli8132 Muslims believe that part is retrofitting in hindsight by rumor/story development. The evidence that it happened like that is much flimsier than the evidence for the crucifixion and even "resurrection", wouldn't you agree?

@valinorean4816

3 сағат бұрын

@@voxpopuli8132 Muslims believe this is just rumors/story development afterwards. Tahrif - corruption of the scripture (not necessarily deliberate, like the telephone game).

@tomson3239

3 сағат бұрын

​@@valinorean4816 what a gymnastics making his story . You shall bear false witness. Muhammad is a liar

So glad you’re starting to make videos refuting islam! God bless always!

@user-jy6hd9uw8h

3 күн бұрын

A waste of his talents tbh 😂

@annemurphy9339

3 күн бұрын

@@user-jy6hd9uw8h. It seems a beautiful use of biblical/historical knowledge since the truth can lead many to salvation in Christ.

@garethsutherland9649

3 күн бұрын

@@user-jy6hd9uw8h never a waste imo. Someone could be on the fence of which religion to look into and many these days look at Islam. These videos may help them see the truth. I understand what u meant though :D

@Loltroll8

3 күн бұрын

@@user-jy6hd9uw8hNyet, even being agnostic myself, Islam should be resisted and actively chased from the west

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

Also on top of this if they don't believe in historical facts then you can prove that the "god" of Islam is a liar and decieved people into thinking it was Jesus, which is what Satan does. A perfect being won't ever lie

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@SM_MEX

2 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512 I sort of skimmed through this whole comment(I'm not bouta actually read and respond) and I'm pretty sure you never actually refuted the argument. You just said "issues" that you thought you found in the bible. Thats like if I said that "bananas are bad" and you argued "no they're not, because apples are bad!" Which makes no sense at all because you never actually refuted the claim.

@v_cartographer

2 күн бұрын

Dude, he refuted the perfection of Jesus, because the apostles (if we presume they were authors of the gospels) contradict in some of their claims about him. And we know of him mostly due to the assumed apostles. Disclaimer: I am sceptic of both the Quran and the Bible, but I emphasize on the Bible because the Quran is obviously full with contradictions, so debating it is easy and boring. So, there are 3 logical options I see: 1) Jesus lied to the apostles, gave different info to each of the authors, so he isn't perfect. 2) Or it could have been their own decision to lie about Jesus, which hypothetically leads to the variant that he might be perfect and not a liar, but then at least one of the 4 apostles, assumed authors of the gospels, is a liar. 3) Think about this - the oldest manuscripts of the gospels are anonymous works, but theologians claim that they are copies of what the apostles wrote. But who says that this is the case, theologians lack actual evidence to back their statement. So, these manuscripts might not even be copies of apostles' work, but forgery. Which leads to the 3rd variant: apostles and Jesus might haven't lied, but apostles' written work (if such existed) is lost and what we have is the fantasy of anonymous authors.

@pavinivfx

2 күн бұрын

Christians also don't believe in facts, including when We say Yeshua never created the Christianity but came to reform Judaism. "If your justice does not exceed the justice Pharisees and Scribes, you will not enter in the Reign of Heaven". Christianity copied the Yovel (Jubilee), the immersion and called baptism, changed the times and feats like Dani'el prophesized, removed the fourth commandment and changed the second. Do you know the shabat is represented by the letter Dalet (ד) which means door? The Shabat is the door for the commandments and the messianic era is considered the Shabat of the world. But when I get people to speak these things, They reject the truth and keep with the same idea that Christians don't need to do anything, and will be saved and everyone will be condemned, which is for me such arrogance, considering Yeshua will only come for Israel and gentiles are just inserted into the Olive. Preaching against commandments saying they're abolished while making people pay "tithe", a thing that is also inside the 613 commandments is Satanic. But it is always easier to point to the other.

@sergeantmatthias8101

Күн бұрын

@@v_cartographer one of the proofs of the truth behind the confirmation of the Gospels' authors would be the fact that early Christians such as St Irenaeus and St Justin Martyr had undoubtedly believed that the Gospel of Mark is attributed to St Mark, the Gospel of Matthew is attributed to St Matthew, etc. These early Church Fathers didnt argue over the authors of the Gospels. And thus is only by the second century

Well, the disciples all pretty much died in terrible, horrible ways, after years of persecution. Why would they go through all of that if they knew Jesus didn’t die on the cross?

@valinorean4816

20 сағат бұрын

Alright, let's say Jesus was on the cross but he was under an invincibility spell, so that it only looked like they killed him but they didn't (miraculous swoon theory), later he recovered, magically healed himself completely (Islam acknowledges he could do this) and came to the disciples, and they misunderstood this as him resurrecting from the head. Note how in the doubting Thomas episode he emphasizes that he was on the cross, but never says that he died. This is consistent with the Quran. (The story about a hole in the roof is not from Muhammad.)

@akbeal

20 сағат бұрын

@@valinorean4816what a huge reach to try and get around this. I pray you lift up your eyes, open your heart and ask God to show you the truth. Seek it and you shall find him!

@RickyVis

18 сағат бұрын

@@valinorean4816 Technically you could still argue he died but didn't truly die as in once your dead you can never come back. It doesn't say he didn't die, it just says that they didn't kill him. If someone is killed and comes back from the dead than you didn't truly kill him did you? as a hypothetical, imagine you shoot someone and the person is clinically dead but the doctors manage to revive him than you haven't killed him even though he was dead.

@valinorean4816

17 сағат бұрын

@@RickyVis clinically dead is not dead lol, medical resuscitation is not resurrection

@Yamyatos

15 сағат бұрын

That's misinformation. For most of them we dont know how they died, and those we know of only few died for reasons related to persecution. Also, some of their death stories seem heavily copied form each other, ie likely made up in the first place.

To any Muslims in the comments, repent, believe in the Gospels, and be baptized

@edisonchin2463

3 күн бұрын

NGL, that sounds kinda arrogant.

@axxel9626

3 күн бұрын

Just repent and believe in the Gospel. That's it, water baptism does not save you. The baptism of the Holy Spirit does tho.❤✝️

@MSKofAlexandria

3 күн бұрын

@@axxel9626 Although I partially disagree, I still love you brother ☦❤‍🔥

@Tomakia8

3 күн бұрын

@@MSKofAlexandria and the man himself jesus disagrees with you

@desmonides

3 күн бұрын

@@Tomakia8big facts

Yea this is the best argument against Islam why would it be "made to look like he was crucified"? in doing this Allah purposely deceived everyone including the disciples creating Christianity a false religion and leading everyone astray then 600 years later going "lol gotcha, everything you guys have believed for 100s of years is wrong and I done it on purpose". Like what? I genuinely feel like this is an indefensible position to have.

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@ninaa_luciic

3 күн бұрын

​@@magaretprempeh5512Context matters.

@danielwilliams7161

3 күн бұрын

Same for Mormonism or any "corrupt gospel" based religion. They all imply that God sat on His hands and let billions of people be deceived for centuries before finally correcting the record via a vision delivered to a single guy with no corroborating evidence. Oh and that guy also gets to marry his underage cousins and gets 10% of your income because God told him so.

@darnoc0010

2 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512 Nothing was refuted? You claim they contradict but at know time did they. Several of those accounts were at different times. Also neither account was first hand. Those writing were not there at the birth. They are recounting based on public records of the time and what others had told them. Ok some break downs: Both Mary and Joseph were of the line of David. Why Matthew went through Joseph instead of Mary I don't know. You are missing the earlier career of Quirinius. He was in command of the armies as the Legional Legate for the region of Syria from 12BC - 4BC. He governed along with Titius, Saturninus and Varus as Imperial Legates. He had all the same authority (including governing) as the other three. As the wars moved from the region so did he. To end his career he became the Resident Imperial Legates of Syria from 6AD - 12AD. This means he was governing during the end of Harod's life in 4BC. Jesus was born in Bethlehem and an angel came to them and warned of Herod's anger so they fled to Egypt. Harod then ordered the mass slaughter of all young males below the age of three. Then after Harod's death the angel came again and told them to return. The rest you just need to look at context in the story of why its stated.

"if any man come preaching a different Jesus and gospel than that ye received let him be cursed"

At this point the only way for Muslims to reliably prove their claims that the disciples teaching were corrupted, would be to present historical evidence of a different gospel at the time of the early church. But what do you know? No such evidence exists. The shady one is the religion that starts up 600 years later claiming contradictory stuff.

@kashmirandal6282

3 күн бұрын

Very true. Five hundred (and then some) years worth of people DYING believing in the "wrong faith". Jesus is God.

@ignatiusjackson235

3 күн бұрын

Muhammad was friggin' Joseph Smith in a turban! 😂

@osmanli-li

2 күн бұрын

Firstly, why do you trust the Bible to tell you the story of Adam and Eve, who lived thousands of years before it's writing? Secondly, as you'd agree, God can choose to reveal information whenever he pleases, and information from God will always be more accurate, rather than eye-witnesses.

@kashmirandal6282

2 күн бұрын

@@osmanli-li Reply to my first comment.

@kashmirandal6282

2 күн бұрын

@@osmanli-li And how do you know that it is from God?

So in isaiah it says that the messiah will die for the sins of humanity ( Isaiah 53: 4-6) but if Jesus never died on the cross for our sins, then he isn't the messiah which in favor also disproves Islam which claims him as such.

@danmosby7980

2 күн бұрын

The Quran also instructs mohamed to refer to the reader of the scripture if you are not sure of revelations. It affirms the validity of the Bible and the Torah by deferring to them. The quran claims it is guardian over previous scripture there by further validating their truth. V48.

@joaoornelaslobo3633

2 күн бұрын

@@danmosby7980 Thank you for the follow up brother, together we've just constructed a full-proof argument!

@Faithexplorer4376

2 күн бұрын

no its different bro the meaning of messiah for here

Without lies, islam dies

@user-mz7cn9hq8v

Күн бұрын

@@greenbird679 good, i didn't see the same comment at the top

The fact that Islamic sources debunks islam is hilarious to me. The contradictions and inconsistencies is wild. Well, as usual. WITHOUT LIES, ISLAM DIES!

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Them sources were DEBUNKED by answering Christianity search it up Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@PreachTh3Truth

3 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512 Joseph’s father explained. One is legally, the other is biologically.

@PreachTh3Truth

3 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512who ruled easily explained: both ruled at the same time

@innominate343

Күн бұрын

Could you please tell me about those sources?

@raphaelfeneje486

Күн бұрын

@@innominate343 Sources for what?? How your Qu'ran lies about the crucifixion?? How it confirms the Injeel but according to Muslims we don't know what the Injeel is?? How it falsifies itself by saying if there's no contradiction then it's not from God? How Muhammad preached a different message from ALL the Prophets?? How your Qu'ran condones child marriage? Your hadiths says verses are missing from the Qu'ran, etc.

Isaiah 53 He was pierced for our transgressions he was crushed for our iniquity the punishment that brought us peace was upon him and through his wounds we are healed"

That story about how Jesus wanted a disciple to volunteer for taking his place on the cross is proof of how utilitarian islamic thought is. It doesn't inspire faith like at all

@N.I.A23

3 күн бұрын

I hate religious stories where the moral is "just trust religio blindly bro". Even as a kid the idea of loving some prophets more than my own family sounded so fucked up. Give a lesson and meaning behind it atleast lol.

@joea.9969

3 күн бұрын

Jesus also said He is the good shepherd who lays down His life, not “Im the great deceived who asks by buddy to die instead of me”

@osmanli-li

2 күн бұрын

This video is a perfect example of Christian deception. He Cherry picked Ibn Abbas (who is in no way divinely inspired) and his interpretation of the verse to prove a sloppy point (which I have responded to in the pinned message). Secondly, you can't claim "Islam doesn't inspire faith" from an interpretation of a scholar. Look to our noble Qur'an, see how it inspires faith.

@LuisUrena-sd6lk

2 күн бұрын

@@osmanli-li If I was an atheist and read some of the stuff in the Quran to acquire faith I would believe even less 😂 Not to mention "prophet" Muhammad was not the best exemplary man or even person to live your life by considering the stuff that he did like, you know; own slaves, tell men they could marry more than one woman, tell his believers to conquer and subjugate non believers (by force), and he married an underage girl....😬Yeah man... You can keep Muhammad, My example to live by is and will always be Jesus Christ.

@thomasgarza9304

2 күн бұрын

Very true, Islam is a religion where you have to send your son to die for "the Lord". Whereas reality is in fact the loving God sent his Son to die for me.

I'm a Christian, but I have heard Baha'is, who are similar to Muslims in many ways, in that they accept the Quran as divinely revealed and Muhammad as a prophet, as well as some Muslims, state that the Quran is not being literal when it says that Christ was not crucified; they argue that it is essentially saying that Jesus was literally killed, but that He is nonetheless alive, and they cite this passage from the Quran to back it up: "Think not of those, who are slain in the way of Allah, as dead. Nay, they are living. With their Lord they have provision." (Quran 3:169) So, they argue, when the Quran says that Jesus was not killed, it is not being literal, but rather speaking figuratively as that other verse is. Thoughts?

@gamerx3071

2 сағат бұрын

then what is this "figurative" death?

@ZeroNumerous

22 минут бұрын

Then, simple point: How does it account for Christ being dead according to the Romans, then returning to preach again three days later?

Islam is absolutely confusing...

@danestyn7167

2 күн бұрын

Just cause you don’t get it doesn’t mean it’s false this dude keeps lying about Islam

@Woopor

2 күн бұрын

To be fair, so is Christianity. God is supposedly all loving, all knowing, and all powerful, yet he ordered genocide multiple times, made a rigged game for Adam and Eve to play even though he knew they’d loose, and limited his power in the name of maintaining human free will (which he punishes humans for using)

@darnoc0010

2 күн бұрын

@@Woopor That was a shallow miss understanding of God and free will. I do get your point though.

@ryangeo8409

2 күн бұрын

@@Woopor God is all loving. He gave us a choice. Willingly walk to satan or willingly walk to God. Satan offers many worldly pleasures, or temptations. We can choose to give in to such temptations are we can choose not to go astray and to go to God. Many people chose satan. Even if some people choose satan, he lets us come back, because he loves us. He sent his own son to die a painful death on the cross in exchange for our sins. When we say Jesus died on the cross, it's not like "he was the son of God so it was easy for him". He felt every bit of pain you or me would have felt ourselves being crucified. And yet he forgave us in his last breath.

@ryangeo8409

2 күн бұрын

@@danestyn7167 Alright, but it would be helpful if you show us where he lies so that we can understand your point too.

You could literally say any historical event didn't happen using Islamic logic, lol. You see, Abraham Lincoln didn't actually die. He was just made to appear so by god because he was a very devout Muslim. Man, I love stupid logic

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) no prof yeetus existed

@kashmirandal6282

3 күн бұрын

@@magaretprempeh5512 At least respond to comments!

@jasonpark1556

3 күн бұрын

​@@magaretprempeh5512 so you believe a guy that was born centuries after the events and in his own "holy" book preaches death against non believers and had multiple sex slaves? Ok bud

I believe Islam... IS FALSE! Jesus is the way, the truth and the life.❤

@danestyn7167

2 күн бұрын

The amount of lying is crazy in this video

@noobymooby-ty8gh

Күн бұрын

​@@danestyn7167 Not really lies, just baseless accusation, really. Because even though there are 'plot holes' in islam, there are those too in christianity, and all other religion. I honestly find it baffling that people are trying to 'disprove' and discredit other religions when theirs are filled with many plot holes as any other religion.

@noobymooby-ty8gh

Күн бұрын

Just let people believe what they believe in. Don't try to force your own beliefs onto others.

@joe31226

Күн бұрын

if islam is a lie then why did the universe start with an explosion? checkmate christians

@Cross_Guard

Күн бұрын

​@noobymooby-ty8gh very true no one should force their religion on others. But we can educate and leave the choice to those we teach. Can you please tell me a plot hole with Christianity that I may help with?

And they would say that the bible is corrupted yet in the quran it affirms the bible 😂

@allelss-oh8sj

2 күн бұрын

@@jaredgomora6506 which verse is that one again?

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

Common Christian lies. The Quran doesn’t mention the Bible once. It mentions the Injil, which God gave directly to Christ (Quran 5:46). How could this be the Bible, when the Bible was written 40-60 years after Jesus ascended to Heaven?

@danestyn7167

2 күн бұрын

Stop lying pleade

@BitMan1010

Күн бұрын

@@avaizadil1095 because maybe the quran keeps talking about the injil as something held by christians, even mo-mad was told by allah to ask some christians in his time if he was a true prophet lol. It commands christians to follow their bible that they already have, because allah protects it 😂the jokes are on you for not reading your book.

@V4W

Күн бұрын

@@allelss-oh8sj 3. It is He Who has sent down the Book (the Qur'ân) to you (Muhammad SAW) with truth, confirming what came before it. And he sent down the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel). 4. Aforetime, as a guidance to mankind, And He sent down the criterion [of judgement between right and wrong (this Qur'ân)]. Truly, those who disbelieve in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh, for them there is a severe torment; and Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Able of Retribution. so basically, the torah is the 5 first book of old testament and the gospel is new testament. they say its true and that it is the word of god and the word of god cannot be corrupted. in the bible, the ruler of this world is evil. in islam, the ruler of this world is allah.

Sad that Muslims don't believe in the prophets who wrote about the Messiah dying for our sins in the OT.

I always thought the crucifixion disagreement was rather odd for Islam, considering that they share so much beliefs, ideology, etc. with the other two Abtahamic religions. (Then again, Jehovah's Witnesses believe that Jesus was nailed to a mere vertical stake, so...)

@sliglusamelius8578

3 күн бұрын

It's not even in the same ballpark.

@CatholicaVeritas777

3 күн бұрын

Isn’t it odd that the MOST IMPORTANT EVENT in Christianity they ignore and leave out? Isn’t it also odd that muhammad and joseph smith got their teachings from angels? (Galatians 1:8)

@christiancrusader9374

3 күн бұрын

​@@CatholicaVeritas777Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

@jesusisunstoppable4438

3 күн бұрын

​@@CatholicaVeritas777 Catholicism is Satanic

@jkb2819

3 күн бұрын

It's a pretty fundamental difference actually, in the Quran most of the notable figures in the Bible are recast as prophets in a long line culminating in Muhammad. God looks after his prophets, and they obey him (as you should), therefore God would never have allowed Jesus to be killed. It's really a way of justifying Muhammad himself by projecting him onto previous figures, then taking out the various inconsistencies that happens when you do that (Jesus is not the only person to get a rewrite).

this also leads to a genuine question that also arises, why were the jews so keen on arresting Jesus and later crucifying him if he didn’t break any laws? Why did they arrest him on the count of blasphemy (claiming to be God)? Islam says Jesus never claimed to be God, so then why did the Jews arrest him?

"Time to shine the light, preach the Gospel, defend the Christianity and refure the Islam" - Testify (probably)

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

That's why Zakir Naik never teach the substitution theory.

@j.bernardsaipoh8111

5 сағат бұрын

what is that

@apel.ogetika

5 сағат бұрын

@@j.bernardsaipoh8111 sorry?

I also find it a bit tickling that the Quran had to specifically mention that Jesus was not crucified. And why is it that Islam was written 600 years after Jesus was crucified? And why does the Quran have parallels with the Gospels? I ama by no means trying to diss Islam, but in my opinion, I believe that it was because Muhamed wanted to create his own religion because he was feeling left out. I believe that the Gospels are a real account of the life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ

The funniest thing in Islam for me is how it is based on just ONE random criminals testimony, which could be so easily a lie.

@danmosby7980

2 күн бұрын

Nothing is verified by any witness for mohamed the illiterate. So he could not read what was put in Quran and easily verses were stolen and entered in Aramaic from christian masses..

@impasse0124

2 күн бұрын

Well that’s the thing that always interests me too. Judaism and Christianity don’t rely on a single person but rather many followers of God over many centuries. False cults don’t usually happen that way. They usually begin by a single individual claiming to have the truth that nobody else has which is precisely how Islam began. The fact that the writings of Moses don’t contradict King David or the prophets or the Apostles seems much more convincing to me. It’s a living faith that isn’t embodied in a single “prophet” whose claims you have to trust without question.

@danmosby7980

2 күн бұрын

There are no witnesses either to any of mohamed's revelations, apostles revelation and miracles are all verified eg Paul. Also mohamed says there are no miracles in Quran cause no one believed the donkey miracle??? so allah got the poos and stopped hahaha. lame

@marcosgonzalez4207

2 күн бұрын

​@@impasse0124 religions usually come from superstitions and stories for children

You know this reminds me of the "my source is that i made it the **** up" meme

If Jesus ascended to heaven, why should we need someone to resemble him to be crucified in his place?!! Any logical reason?! I just don’t get it?!

The Quran version of the story also doesn't fit the martyrdom of ten of the twelve disciples, the two exceptions being Judas and John. It would have been reasonable to expect those disciples to ask themselves, "Why should I die for a lie when Jesus Himself took the coward's way out?" If only for that reason, the Quran is suggesting is an absurdity.

Islam is just more successful Mormonism

@notbry1812

2 күн бұрын

Facts lol

@TestifyApologetics

2 күн бұрын

I'm glad Joseph Smith wasn't more popular and didn't have a doctrine of Jihad.

@Faithexplorer4376

2 күн бұрын

@@TestifyApologetics look at the true meaning of jihad before claiming its all terrorist stuff

Either Christhianity is true,or Christianity is true

@Cartoonfan83

2 күн бұрын

@@Alyson-amarante or the third option, Christianity is True.

@user-rz2bi7ff5q

Күн бұрын

Guys I can’t believe you forgot the 4th option Christianity is true

@getplayed7272

Күн бұрын

@@Alyson-amarante or neither! Just because one has false facts doesn't mean the other is true either. And that doesn't mean a religion is not useful either, religions have many different uses and purposes for people

@Alyson-amarante

23 сағат бұрын

@@getplayed7272 you cant forget about the 5th option Christhianity is true

@Yamyatos

15 сағат бұрын

As an atheist, im pretty sure muslims use the very same logic about their religion.

Even as an atheist i knew jesus died but thought maybe he had a twin that buried his body and took his place, and thats still more reliable and makes more sense than a stunt double💀

@k.umquat8604

2 күн бұрын

We only know for certain that he was crucified,we can't know anything else from non religious sources. The New Testament after all was compiled at least decades after his death

@Christisthetruce

Күн бұрын

​@k.umquat8604 the first new testament book/letter was written 40-50ad and the latest was in 90ad what are you talking about😭

@jasonpark1556

Күн бұрын

@@k.umquat8604 the eyewitnesses would still be alive decades after. Not 500 years after

@k.umquat8604

Күн бұрын

@@Christisthetruce Can you share evidence for this? I have seen different dates, most of which place the writing of the earliest gospel at least 20 years after his death

@marcj3682

19 сағат бұрын

@@k.umquat8604 "we can't know anything else from non religious sources." King Agbar wrote a letter to Tiberus Caesar "Abgar, king of Armenia, to my Lord Tiberius, emperor of the Romans, greeting:- I know that nothing is unknown to your Majesty, but, as your friend, I would make you better acquainted with the facts by writing. The Jews who dwell in the cantons of Palestine have crucified Jesus: Jesus without sin, Jesus after so many acts of kindness, so many wonders and miracles wrought for their good, even to the raising of the dead. Be assured that these are not the effects of the power of a simple mortal, but of God. During the time that they were crucifying Him, the sun was darkened, the earth was moved, shaken; Jesus Himself, three days afterwards, rose from the dead and appeared to many. " Tiberus' reply included this, "Though we had already heard several persons relate these facts, Pilate has officially informed us of the miracles of Jesus. He has certified to us that after His resurrection from the dead He was acknowledged by many to be God."

I pray this video softens the hearts of Muslims to begin seeing the truth and coming to God’s Kingdom on Earth: the Church.

Christ Died For Us

@moosa86

3 күн бұрын

Please elaborate on your understanding of this phrase and explain the significance for his willingness to be crucified 🙏

@robertbennion3166

3 күн бұрын

@@moosa86 significance of His willingness was to bring Eternal Life to those who believe. Through His crucifixion and burial, and resurrection. John 14:6 I Am the Way the Truth and the Life, no man comes to the Father but through Me. He is the door to the Father. John 10:9 [9]I am the door. If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture. The one mediator. We ask forgiveness, forgiven by Him, washed in His blood that makes us righteous to go before The Father. God is too Holy for our sins, we are as filthy rags, but Christ's crucifixion on the Cross made the path for us to be with God. Through His shed blood. It purifies, sanctifies us. John 11:25-26 [25]Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. [26]And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?”

@sladedraken479

3 күн бұрын

@moosa86 There are multiple reasons 1. The Problem of Sin: According to the Bible, all humans have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). Sin separates humanity from God, and the consequence of sin is death (Romans 6:23). 2. The Need for Atonement: In the Old Testament, atonement for sin was made through animal sacrifices. These sacrifices symbolized the seriousness of sin and the need for a substitute to bear the penalty of death (Leviticus 17:11). However, these sacrifices were temporary and had to be repeated. 3. Jesus as the Perfect Sacrifice: The New Testament presents Jesus as the ultimate and perfect sacrifice for sin. Unlike the animal sacrifices, Jesus' sacrifice was once for all time. Jesus is described as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His death on the cross was a substitutionary atonement, meaning He died in our place, bearing the punishment for our sins (1 Peter 2:24). 4. Fulfillment of Prophecy: Jesus' death was also a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, such as those found in Isaiah 53, which speaks of a suffering servant who would be pierced for our transgressions and crushed for our iniquities (Isaiah 53:5). 5. God's Love and Justice: The death of Jesus is seen as a demonstration of both God's love and justice. God's justice requires that sin be punished, but His love provided a way for that punishment to be borne by another. Romans 5:8 says, "But God demonstrates His love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." 6. Reconciliation with God: Through Jesus' death, believers are reconciled to God. Jesus' sacrifice removes the barrier of sin, allowing for a restored relationship with God. This reconciliation is described in 2 Corinthians 5:18-19, which states that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting people's sins against them. 7. Victory Over Death: Finally, Jesus' death and subsequent resurrection are seen as a victory over sin and death. By rising from the dead, Jesus defeated the power of sin and death, offering eternal life to all who believe in Him (1 Corinthians 15:55-57). In summary, Jesus died for our sins to provide a perfect and final atonement, to fulfill prophecy, to demonstrate God's love and justice, to reconcile humanity with God, and to achieve victory over sin and death.

@sladedraken479

3 күн бұрын

@@moosa86 There are multiple reasons 1. The Problem of Sin: According to the Bible, all humans have sinned and fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). Sin separates humanity from God, and the consequence of sin is death (Romans 6:23). 2. The Need for Atonement: In the Old Testament, atonement for sin was made through animal sacrifices. These sacrifices symbolized the seriousness of sin and the need for a substitute to bear the penalty of death (Leviticus 17:11). However, these sacrifices were temporary and had to be repeated. 3. Jesus as the Perfect Sacrifice: The New Testament presents Jesus as the ultimate and perfect sacrifice for sin. Unlike the animal sacrifices, Jesus' sacrifice was once for all time. Jesus is described as the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world (John 1:29). His death on the cross was a substitutionary atonement, meaning He died in our place, bearing the punishment for our sins (1 Peter 2:24). 4. Fulfillment of Prophecy: Jesus' death was also a fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, such as those found in Isaiah 53, which speaks of a suffering servant who would be pierced for our transgressions and crushed for our iniquities (Isaiah 53:5). 5. God's Love and Justice: The death of Jesus is seen as a demonstration of both God's love and justice. God's justice requires that sin be punished, but His love provided a way for that punishment to be borne by another. Romans 5:8 says, "But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." 6. Reconciliation with God: Through Jesus' death, believers are reconciled to God. Jesus' sacrifice removes the barrier of sin, allowing for a restored relationship with God. This reconciliation is described in 2 Corinthians 5:18-19, which states that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting people's sins against them. 7. Victory Over Death: Finally, Jesus' death and subsequent resurrection are seen as a victory over sin and death. By rising from the dead, Jesus defeated the power of sin and death, offering eternal life to all who believe in Him (1 Corinthians 15:55-57). In summary, Jesus died for our sins to provide a perfect and final atonement, to fulfill prophecy, to demonstrate God's love and justice, to reconcile humanity with God, and to achieve victory over sin and death.

@craiglewis2865

3 күн бұрын

@@moosa86Jesus was willing to be crucified out of love for us, because his death on the cross opened the door for humans to achieve eternal life. He did not have to die in the cross if he didn’t want to, but chose to out of love for us, and out of a desire to save us. Read John 3:16

Wow, the Gospel Reliability arguments are super effective when applied to a worldview which already accepts much of scripture as being genuine.

@The_Prog_Rocker

3 күн бұрын

Agreed.

@infernovoltage3378

3 күн бұрын

edit: nvmd lol... I stand corrected abt the 1st part. (Its not a Gospel Reliability argument. This is a video about the unreliability of the Q'ran.)

@TestifyApologetics

3 күн бұрын

​​@@infernovoltage3378it's a little of both actually, but more of Islam being false

@telephonebear21

3 күн бұрын

@@TestifyApologetics Those two very specific applications of examples of undesigned coincidences and embarassment criterion for this argument is very succinct and compelling.

@abdoume1406

3 күн бұрын

​@@TestifyApologeticsto critisise quran you went for ibn abass, which never recivred revelation, he spoke of him self. On the contrary allah said he made it appear as if they crucified him, so even to the deciples it would appear so... you proved nothing

Ok, lets assume Jesus didnt need to die for any purpose to be fullfilled and God could just take him up into heaven and everything would be fine. Then why on earth would God need to make someone else look like Jesus and get brutally yortured to death? If the crucifiction doesnt serve a purpose, why would anyone need to be crucified at all?

@marcosgonzalez4207

2 күн бұрын

Well, i'm not muslim, but put a christian man to pay for the sins of humanity makes a LOOOOOT more sense than create a pure man that actually wants to die in that place since his birth

@taps8781

Күн бұрын

@@marcosgonzalez4207 what does that even mean?

@jacobhargiss3839

Күн бұрын

@@marcosgonzalez4207 the reason it had to be jesus was for a few reasons. 1) no normal man can pay the burden of any other mans sins with his life because he already must pay the burden of his own. So, the one to die must be perfect and with no sins to pay for. 2) God must punish someone for our sins but does not want to punish us, and punishing any other innocent man instead would be unjust. So, God had to take our punishment on himself. Hence, God dwelled among us in the person of Jesus Christ.

@cygnusprime6728

19 сағат бұрын

​@@jacobhargiss3839do you hear yourself? God "punished himself" to forgive us? How that even remotely logical?

@willyboinka1070

3 сағат бұрын

The people who wanted to kill Jesus deserve to be misguided he was to be their messiah who was to rule all of the earth but they rejected him so God took him and will bring back in the end times so that he can kill the Anti Christ the false Jewish messiah

No one would willingly be tortured and killed for a lie yet all of the apostles except John did testify with their own lives that Jesus died on the cross and rose 3 days later. I can think of nothing more evil than calling Jesus a liar and having someone else take His place. That lie is from the pit of hell.

@davidmathews9633

2 күн бұрын

Can you show me in the Bible where all the disciples besides john were tortured and killed? If you can show verses on how Paul and these guys were tortured and killed, that would be really helpful. Andrew Bartholomew or Nathanael James, the Lesser or Younger Judas Jude or Thaddeus Matthew or Levi Philip Simon the Zealot Thomas

@debbiesmith8785

Күн бұрын

@@davidmathews9633 I will not do your homework for you but I can direct you the 469 page dissertation by Sean McDowell a well respected associate professor of the Christian apologetics program at Talbot School of Theology University. There is also a wide variety of sources including secular historians, letters between church fathers, the Bible itself (you can start with John 21:18-19) etc.

I do believe that the meme depiction of Muhammad officially puts Testify in the same league as David wood, AP, vocab and, South Park Congrats dude!

As far as conspiracy theories go, Mo's is pretty crappy, even if compared to risible Atheist conspiracies. I liked the part where Jesus ascends to Heaven through a tiny hole in the roof. Nice detail, but it does skip over a heck of a lot other tricky details. Also, if Jesus could change appearances, why not change his own and escape? Mo's trouble was he was an illiterate and remarkably ignorant man who learned a little about the Tanakh but had a bad memory. Mo didn't even get Yeshua's (AKA Jesus) real name right, Mo said his name was Esau. Correct me if I am wrong, but Esau was the only human God said He hated by name, so the error is very on-brand for Mo. When I first started looking into Is-lame back in '01-'02 and oh boy, I got a snoot full.

@lowballinn

3 күн бұрын

He also calls Mariam (Moses sister) the mother of Jesus 😂

@mickdomingo7276

3 күн бұрын

He was known as The Ear by the local pagans, because he believed everything he heard.

@legreedysqueegee

3 күн бұрын

Thanks for the info Pinochet

@joea.9969

3 күн бұрын

“Isa” is what they call Him, not Esau, different etymology like theres no J in Hebrew and Greek etc so it became I ir Y in translation… like but yeah youre pretty much right.

@matthewmoulton1

3 күн бұрын

@@lowballinn Please see the Wikipedia page "Maryam (name)". I would include the link, but KZread likes to delete comments with links. I don't know about this Mo you speak of, but calling Mary, the mother of Jesus, "Miriam" (or some variation of that spelling), is a translation miscommunication, not an actual error.

More great work, thanks for having the courage to make videos going at Islam because the truth is they go at us all the time and while the goal isn’t to argue, we do need to make the counter arguments known… Side note, I recently stumbled upon a skeptic who basically says Matthew/Mark, Luke, and John all goof in contradicting themselves on Jesus’ anointing - in John it’s at Lazarus’ house before the triumphal entry, in Matthew/Mark it’s after the entry, in the house of Simon the leper, and in Luke it takes place at the house of Simon the Pharisee way earlier in Jesus’ ministry. This is the type of thing that they love since it seems to show that this is all coming from an unstable oral tradition. I’d love to see a video explaining the differences and why they aren’t necessarily contradictions

I still don't get why they believe the Quran. The Quran calls allah the great deceiver while the Bible calls satan the great deceiver. Some Muslims told me that it was Gabriel that talk to Muhammad not satan and that it's not possible for satan to be him, but the Bible states that satan can also be anyone he wanted. Also, many non Christians wrote how Jesus was crucified so a person claiming that they didn't 600 years later cannot be true.

@Blazeroad12

3 күн бұрын

They will cope and deflect by saying " it's not deceiver bro it's the best planner". I just have conversation like that just now. "Allah is the best planner if people plays 2D chess he will play 4D chess with efficiency and wisdom" "good at planning means good at deceiving " "The intent is what separates the benevolent planner than a trickster" I replied with "Bruh,do you realize that mastermind do more than just deceiving and tricking people ".( I'm trying to say people who make great plan capable of manipulation which leads to tricking and deceive people).

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

Except, no it’s not cope. In the Quran it literally says planner not deceiver. You just repeat Christian deceptions with no knowledge of the Quran or even basic Arabic. ‎In verses such as Quran 10:21 and 7:99 the Arabic word “مكر” (makar) literally translates to planning or plotting. It is never once used to describe deception.

@Woopor

2 күн бұрын

The Bible also calls god the creator of all evil though

@classeontop7403

2 күн бұрын

@@Woopor The only verse where the Bible even mentioned that God created evil is in Isaiah 45:7. It's "I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things." It never said that God created all of evil. The word "evil" in that verse is also translated by other Bible versions as calamity and disaster. The King James Bible was the one that had the word evil in it. Now, did God create Disasters? Yes. Did he created evil, well that's complicated because he created satan who created evil.

@Blazeroad12

2 күн бұрын

@@avaizadil1095 >He make Jesus look like he died >By doing so he purposely created a religion that is known as Christianity today and people still believe in it and people say their teaching is filled with deception. Sure totally not a deceiver

Guys we dont need to make up all of this stuff... early christianity is unanimous and not only the crucifixion but nearly every teaching of the early church fathers on all 3 continents is a testimony of what the apostles taught and so what Jesus taught. If they cant accept that it's their fault. Keep pushing that argument until those who are ready to accept the truth and follow God accept it.

Somewhere in Isaiah 40 or 41. God always said he choose the Isreal (the jews) as his servant. Not the americans, arabs, brazlian, chinese… so wiser to read what the jews wrote also

Thank You For Your VIdeos. There are so helpful.I am a fan. Greetings from Poland.

@TestifyApologetics

3 күн бұрын

My grandmother is full-blooded Polish. wielu łask Bożych!

@CyberUser_055

3 күн бұрын

@@TestifyApologetics I am half Polish and Italian. I was born in Italy but I have been living in Poland for 18 years

@toslaw9615

3 күн бұрын

Greetings from Poland!

@efrencruz8327

3 күн бұрын

@@CyberUser_055 keep spreading testify on Facebook and twitter and Instagram and in your Beautiful country Poland and Italy and other European countries but it is going to take years so take your time and be a messenger my friend save Poland and save Italy and save European countries my friend

@efrencruz8327

3 күн бұрын

@@toslaw9615 keep spreading testify on Facebook and twitter and Instagram and in your Beautiful country Poland and other European countries but it is going to take years so take your time and be a messenger my friend save poland my friend

Without lies Islam dies

It's gonna be a whole different comment section when Christians both knows the Bible and qu'ran. 😂

The insult to Alexamenos which is a grafiti that appears BEFORE quran, insulted that Jesus was a donkey who was crucified, which means that Jesus is crucified

Even if we take the assumption that he wasn't crucified, we need to question why did they want to crucify him. The reason for the crucifixion was because he blasphemed to be the Son of God, according to the Jews that judged him. If Jesus made the claim to be the Son of God, then he obviously cannot be a prophet in Islam either, because Islam rejects the trinity of God.

@tombuddy100

3 күн бұрын

Muslims get around that dilemma too by claiming that they wanted to kill him because they would kill their prophets in the past. However, they seem to provide no reason why would they want to harm someone telling them what they would want to hear?

@marcosgonzalez4207

2 күн бұрын

But that has a easy counter argument, on the abrahamic logic, all men are considered brothers because all we are sons of the creator

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

Simple, they wanted to crucify him since they rejected him as the Messiah.

@tombuddy100

2 күн бұрын

@@avaizadil1095 And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain.

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

@@tombuddy100 That is verse 4:157 not 4:171.

I mean, you don't even need to go that far to ebunk Islam. How did Allah treat his prophet? He made endless cocessions and let him live promiscuously. How did God treat his prophets? He taught them humility and obedience and was very strict at that. One of those is more reasonable than the other.

@MurtadMangler

3 күн бұрын

@@r4_in_space Our prophet suffered too y'know. People threw stones, garbage, thorns, and even camel guts on him. He went to a city (Ta'if) to preach and the townsfolk stoned him to the point where his sandals were filled with blood and his clothes turned red.

@portallover3478

3 күн бұрын

​@@MurtadManglerYeah, but Allah made MULTIPLE exceptions. Muhammad is a self insert Mary Sue who got to have 11 wives, is more beloved than Isa in the eyes of Allah, was never kicked out of being a prophet after evil like the others, is the only one to be with Allah above the seven heavens, is the one to judge Muslims, he's such a uwu special boy for someone who was just as much of sinners as the rest of the prophets.

@moosa86

3 күн бұрын

@r4_in_space Okay so you’re forgetting that King David was “God’s anointed” and also had many wives and lots of military might and power…. God described David as His servant and “a man after God’s own heart.”

@portallover3478

3 күн бұрын

@@moosa86 I feel like you were talking to me, which if so, David still got rebuked, and Muhammad said you can only have 4 wives iirc

@joea.9969

3 күн бұрын

@@moosa86David repented of his sins. He also suffered consequences of being greedy with women and disobeying God, his own dearest son turned on him and was killed. Also Solomons downfall was his many wives and concubines. Ever since God created Adam and Eve the plan has been ONE man ONE woman. Since Abraham and Sarah introduced Hagar( a third wheel) there( and look at the mess with Jacobs 4 women and their children) there has been strife.g

I think they don't mean that he wasn't literally crucified, but that he didn't really die. You die when your soul leaves your body and doesn't return. But Jesus' soul did return after three days so theoretically he wasn't killed nor crucified, because there he was, alive. I think a lot of Muslims just don't know what they're saying. They are just relying on the "trust me" guys.

If it was not Jesus who was crucified and raised again, why all of the apostles be faithful until the end and willing to die as martyrs. Are they willing to die for something untrue?

This goes unimaginably hard, cant wait for one that counters their idiotic claim of biblical corruption

The fact that Islam can call the being they worship "The Great Deceiver" and still trust and believe in him is beyond moronic and is of itself a contradiction in belief. God is not so weak that he needs to deceive people to allow his will to be done. He is all powerful, and has no reason to deceive, especially when he tells others not to deceive. "A false witness will not go unpunished, And he who speaks lies shall perish" (Proverbs 19:9)

@joshstanley1732

3 күн бұрын

The angel Muhammad spoke with was Satan disguised as Gabriel

@AmadeusN.R.

3 күн бұрын

​@@joshstanley1732how do you know?

@briandiehl9257

3 күн бұрын

​@@AmadeusN.R.galations tells us that

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

You’re such a deceptive liar. In the Quran it says planner not deceiver. You just repeat Christian deceptions with no knowledge of the Quran or even basic Arabic. ‎In verses such as Quran 10:21 and 7:99 the Arabic word “مكر” (makar) literally translates to planning or plotting. It is never once used to describe deception. Without lies, Chr*stianity dies.

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

You’re such a deceptive liar. In the Quran it says planner not deceiver. You just repeat Christian deceptions with no knowledge of the Quran or even basic Arabic. ‎In verses such as Quran 10:21 and 7:99 the Arabic word “مكر” (makar) literally translates to planning or plotting. It is never once used to describe deception.

How do muslims know that the bible has been corrputed? because their teachers say that? Can any muslim produce a bible that has not been corrupted so we can compare them and see where it has been corrupted for ourselves! 🤔

A simpler version would be "Your explanation makes Allah out to be a deceiver" and a practicing Muslim will already struggle with this. It is important to remember, that they at least do respect our savior, as opposed to judaism, which says he is burning in a pit of excrement for eternity in Hell. They call him sorcerer and liar and say that his punishment was just and deserved. A muslim would never. They wouldn't disrespect Jesus in such a way, because he is quoted more times in the koran than even their prophet Mohammed is, and yet most Christians will call a jew a "brother", but never a muslim. Most Christians will defend any action israel takes out of some misguided sense of moral duty, while never even considering that they have never repented and deny any wrongdoing. Quite the opposite in fact. So let's not be so quick to jump on discrepancies when most of you dont have the courage to honestly address and confront those who truly hate Christ.

72 virgins right…………..RIGHT? 🤪

There wouldn't be arguments and issues if they actually cared for what historic accounts say.

@hashman4090

2 күн бұрын

Historic accounts say Jesus is God?

@niccolopaganini1782

2 күн бұрын

@@hashman4090 well, we have Gospels are reliable and they record Jesus making divine claims. Join the pieces.

@hashman4090

2 күн бұрын

@@niccolopaganini1782 for example? ( Other than John which doesn't match any of the others)

@Pofferfiche-ug3be

2 күн бұрын

@@hashman4090 Matthew 28:18 'Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me"'

@Woopor

2 күн бұрын

@@niccolopaganini1782 the gospels contradict EACH OTHER

I think the biggest debunk for Islam is when they claim “only god can judge” and it says so as well, but it also states “Jesus will come and judge us” yet they continue to deny his authority and say he is only a prophet

@odelmehdi3086

6 сағат бұрын

He'll be a witness in the afterlife not a judge "bukhari:3448". Same as the other prophets with their people.

@michaelvasquez7405

6 сағат бұрын

@@odelmehdi3086 Surah Ali’imran, verse 55, I’ve read the book, this verse claims he will descend and separate the believers and disbelievers. And will judge the believers. Lmao

...im surprised that Islamic people couldnt see how far fetched and outta character it is for Jesus to make a plan like that ._.

To your catch-22, the Muslims would simply say "the Bible is corrupted, and therefore Jesus' prophecy of his own crucifixion is unreliable". I suppose you'll address that or have already, but evidence will never be enough to convert anyone.

@BringJoyNow

3 күн бұрын

True, the solution here is to go out on Jewish sources, and then see that Jesus work on earth * without * the death and resurrection won't put him as Messiah, rather just a rebel magician with followers that went mad (failing to follow the prophet preaching) making up a story for no gain. To be a Messiah "candidate" is not enough to be that, the Hebrews were not stupid.

@KopperNeoman

3 күн бұрын

At that point you're throwing pearls before swine. I for one did in fact convert thanks to evidence.

@pgpython

3 күн бұрын

The problem with that argument is that it self defeating. If the bible is corrupted then nothing in the bible can be taken as true. Zero zilch. Muslims can't even claim that jesus existed or if he did exist that he was a prophet because they have no scriptures to lean on. The quran is just out there without any solid foundation

@Narikku

3 күн бұрын

He addressed this in a previous video: by asserting this claim, it also contradicts the Quran, because the Quran asserts that the true Christians succeeded and became popular with their doctrines. If the Bible actually is corrupted, where are the true doctrines of the real Christians, that Allah said was successful and widespread?

@JackieJKENVtuber

3 күн бұрын

Saw this in another comment, but even in the Quran it seems Jesus predicted his own death Surah 19:33 "So peace is on me the day I was born, the day that I die, and the day that I shall be raised up to life (again)"! -Yusuf Ali Translation

Simple answer: We don't believe in the Bible. "Dilemma" done.

@thatguy2521

2 күн бұрын

It actually doesn’t fix the dilemma, because this argument was based off the Quran

@sirrooster1541

2 күн бұрын

@@thatguy2521 It assumed that Muslims believe in the Bible. Because the entire premise of the argument relies on Muslims taking the Bible as authoritative.

@thatguy2521

2 күн бұрын

@@sirrooster1541 the second part assumes that, but the part about Jesus being replaced by a apostle, and Jesus predicting his death is apart of the Quran.

@JereBismuth

2 күн бұрын

​@@thatguy2521 I'm pretty sure Allah saved him at the last second like from what I've heard the story in the Quran is that he thought he would be crucified but he prayed so much that Allah sent someone else and sent him to heaven to save him due to his prayers while in christianity your god doesn't listen to Jesus prayers and crucifies him anyway in the name of "forgiveness" so Jesus thought he would be crucified but he was saved at the last second as a gift from Allah

@thatguy2521

Күн бұрын

@@JereBismuth Qur’an, particularly Surah An-Nisa (4:157-158): “And [for] their saying, ‘Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.’ And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed” This verse doesn’t say he was replaced on the cross or that he even showed up to the cross, he was replaced prior. But either way Jesus if he was a prophet as the Quran suggests he predicted his own death, however he didn’t die he was replaced, which means he’s a false prophet in the Quran, because what he prophesied did not happen. In Christianity Jesus didn’t pray, because Jesus Christ was the one who wanted to be crucified, this was a sacrifice for our sins, something that resembles the Old Testament or Torah sacrifices where they sacrificed lambs for the remission of sins. This shows the Bible’s version aligns more with the Torah than the Qurans, and it doesn’t have the same problem with the story of the crucifixion.

You missed a hugely important detail. If it was an imposter on the cross, then who was resurrected?

Jesus ascending through the roof and the authorities came? It sounds like one of those lies I used tell my friends during childhood.

To someone who believes in a book written by people who never saw Jesus, you seem too assertive against other religions.

@TheCrusaderPub

Күн бұрын

Source?

@TestifyApologetics

Күн бұрын

fedora in pfp detected opinion rejected

@Withoutaconscious

Күн бұрын

@@TestifyApologetics childish nonsense

@elzoz1O20

Күн бұрын

@@TestifyApologeticsthis guy looks at pfp and names and bases the whole character of a person off that , and then wants us to believe his blasphemy against islam 😂😂.

@elzoz1O20

Күн бұрын

@@TheCrusaderPubno , no , flip it around , what’s YOUR source those disciples saw jesus do u know anything about them ?

Oh my. 1:16 is basically: 600 years after Jesus, but Im gonna pretend I was there anyways. Its okay. Totally believable

Several points need to be made on this score: The writings of the New Testament that in which the authors *do* identify themselves are genres in which this is typically done - letters (e.g., of Paul, of Peter) and apocalypses (John). I will be arguing below that the Gospel writers saw themselves as writing in a genre that did not require a self-identification of an author. Then why did *later* writers of later Gospels identify their authors (falsely, as it turns out)? The answer is fairly clear and straightforward. Later Gospel writers were very intent indeed on showing that *their* message, as opposed to the message of other Gospels, was the right, true, and apostolic message to be believed as authoritative. To provide an authoritative account for their own book, in light of the fact that there were other books with other messages floating around, the later authors produced forgeries, *claiming* to be an apostle (Peter, James, Thomas, Philip, etc.) when in fact they were not. That wasn’t a problem with the earlier Gospels. When Mark wrote his Gospel, he felt no need to establish that *his* book, as opposed to others, was apostolic. There *were* no others. So too Matthew and Luke: they were continuing a Gospel tradition, started with Mark, that was widely seen in their circles as authoritative, and so did not need to authorize their message by pretending to be an apostle when they were not. In John’s case the text *is* authorized: the author claims to be basing his account on the traditions passed on by “the disciple Jesus loved.” The author’s own identity doesn’t matter - only that of his source does. I should stress that many of the New Testament writings outside the Gospels that do name the author do so pseudonymously - that is, these are forged writings, authors claiming to be a famous (apostolic) person when in fact they were not. This is true of six of Paul’s letters - 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, Ephesians, 1 and 2 Timothy, and Titus - both of the letters that go under Peter’s name, James, and Jude. Four other books, along with the Gospels, are anonymous: Hebrews (later church fathers said it was written by Paul; but the author does not claim so); 1, 2, 3 John (anonymous, but later attributed to John the Son of Zebedee). So, now I’m back to the question, why would the Gospel writers not identify themselves? Again, I think the popular answer is in essence right: they saw no need to do so. Their point had to do with the message they wanted to deliver, not with their own identity as authorities who could deliver it. There was no need to establish their authority. The authority lay in what Jesus said and did. It was only later when Christians had lots of Gospel accounts before them, with varieties of perspectives represented, that it was important to stress that this, that, or the other Gospel was the one that got it RIGHT. And to do that, readers, editors, and scribes assigned names to earlier Gospels to show that the person delivering the teaching knew what he was talking about. And later Gospel writers made these claims for themselves, maintaining that they were relatives of Jesus (his brother James or his brother Thomas) or disciples (Peter, Philip, and so on). But I think there may be one other thing going on with the NT Gospels that led their authors to write their accounts anonymously. I’ve never seen this suggested in the scholarly literature before, which either means I came up with it myself (in which case, caveat lector!) or I haven’t read enough scholarly literature. It is this. I think when Mark was writing his Gospel, he was imagining that he was continuing the story that he inherited from the Hebrew Bible. As you know, the final prophet of the Hebrew Bible, Malachi, ends by promising that Elijah would be coming before the “day of the Lord.” And how does Mark begin? By describing the coming of John the Baptist in the guise of Elijah. Mark is a continuation of the narrative of the Hebrew Bible. But as you probably know, the Hebrew Bible - in the sequence of books given in the original Hebrew - does not end with Malachi, the final prophet, the way the English Old Testament does. It ends with 2 Chronicles, a narrative book that describes, at the very end, the fall of Jerusalem to the Babylonians and then the promise to rebuild the city by the Persian king Cyrus. There has been sin, and destruction, and the promise of restoration - told in a historical narrative. And Mark picks up the story at that point, with the coming then of the Savior, Jesus. The historical books of the Hebrew Bible (Joshua, Judges, 1 and 2 Samuel, 1 and 2 Kings, 1 and 2 Chronicles) are anonymous. They are telling the history of the people of God, not based on the authority of the author but as a holy narrative of how God worked among his people. The names of the authors are unimportant and irrelevant in this kind of sacred history. Mark continues the sacred history, and like his predecessors, tells his story anonymously. Matthew and Luke and even John do it in their own ways, and also, as a result, tell their sacred history in the person of Jesus anonymously. I don’t think it’s surprising at all that they did not reveal their names.

Quite crazy that some people would yell "God is Almighty!" before stabbing a Christian Bishop 6 times in the eyes and face. Amongst other things.

@Yamyatos

15 сағат бұрын

Religion, as in all of them, is constantly used to justify horrible act, or hide criminals. Do i need to remind you about just how many pedophile priests not only are in the church, but actively protected by it?

It's even worse. The supposed saying of Ibn Abbas about the substitution are found in hadith collection An-Nisa’i (d.915 AD) That hearsay is writted in a hadith almost 300 years after Moh died. It's not reliable. Islam is based on a collection of hearsay and lies. Even the earlist hadith, Bukari came much too late Al Bukhari (d.870 AD), and he threw away 97% of all the sayings he had collected. It'a sham.

@Faithexplorer4376

2 күн бұрын

farid responds debunked that claim look it up lol

@markxivlxii1390

2 күн бұрын

@@Faithexplorer4376 Lol, farid lol oh please What I said is documented from Islamic resources. Farid is a spinner.

@Faithexplorer4376

Күн бұрын

@@markxivlxii1390 sure sure he is nah bro he isn't and he debunks you guys very sell

@markxivlxii1390

Күн бұрын

@@Faithexplorer4376 No, Farid responds is a joke. He cant interact with the material accurately. If he is the best you got then Islam is doomed ( its doomed anyway)

@Faithexplorer4376

Күн бұрын

@@markxivlxii1390 sure says you want he's not the best but he's very good has channels dedicated to debunked apuss and Christian prince watched them all and Christianity is not even good where the historical.proof the slaughter of innocent happened Christianity is doomed

It almost seems as if Satan tried to write his own " Bible" with the quran. It's literally the opposite of what's in the Holy scripture. For example: Jesus saying to people to plug out your eyes, if tempted to sin, but islamic women should veil themselves to not tempt the men to grape them...It would be funny, if it would not be reality...

@magaretprempeh5512

3 күн бұрын

Easy refutation because of the contradiction and our disciples different Who was Joseph’s father? Matthew 1:16 …and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, Both Matthew and Luke give us very early in their gospels the genealogy of Jesus’s father (or step-father, or whoever he was anyway… it’s not clear). The two accounts differ from each other in nearly every generation, even including the very first preceding Joseph. Apparently, Jesus didn’t like much to speak to them about his grandpa. When was Jesus born? Matthew 2:1 Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, Luke 2:2-3 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be registered. This was the first registration when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Matthew and Luke, while discussing the events related to Jesus’s birth, give us slightly different accounts with regard to the public circumstances of the time. Logically, one of the two must be wrong, as Quirinius was appointed legate of Syria in 6 AD, a whole decade after Herod’s death in 4 BC; and only after Herod’s son, Herod Archelaus’s banishment, in the anyway contextually absurd case one might argue that he was the one Herod referred to. Where was Jesus born? Matthew 2:19-21 But when Herod died, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, “Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child’s life are dead.” And he rose and took the child and his mother and went to the land of Israel. Luke 2:2-6 And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David, to be registered with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child. And while they were there, the time came for her to give birth. Still discussing Jesus’s birth, the two Evangelists do not quite agree whether the holy baby was taken or born in Bethlehem. How did Joseph and Mary treat little Jesus? Matthew 1:20-23 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”(which means, God with us). Luke 1:30-33 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.” Mark 6:4 And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his hometown and among his relatives and in his own household.” Here, Matthew and Luke finally agree that Mary and Joseph had every good reason to honor their son. However, according to Mark, Jesus himself does not seem to believe that he has received the due honors. Is the Mosaic Law subject to ever undergo change? Matthew 5:18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Mark 7:19 …since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.)

@tachyontwo

3 күн бұрын

That's my point of view of it

@bigol9223

3 күн бұрын

Not a great argument, Christian women are also supposed to cover up

@oldol12

3 күн бұрын

@@bigol9223 read about the motivation behind in Christianity and the reason for veiling in Islam. You missed the whole point. It's not enough to read, you have to understand, LOL.

@meanderingmangomanthe1stof611

2 күн бұрын

Yes, because Satan would definitely order pagans away from idolatry and to the exclusive worship of the God of Abraham. He would also, of course, enjoin feeding the poor, protecting orphans and widows, dealing justly in business, and praying and fasting. He would also definitely describe himself as an "avowed enemy" to the readers of the Quran. These are all terribly evil things with which Satan hopes to corrupt the whole of humanity.

where is JESUS? he can settle this debate. let him come and give us tell us what happened

Who would you rather believe: 1) Eyewitnesses who saw Jesus before and after he was crucified. 2) People 600 years later writing about it with dubious motives.

@Yamyatos

15 сағат бұрын

You dont necessarily have eyewittnesses tho. You have a text that was written annonymously that claims to contain eyewittness accounts. That's a big difference. It too was written decades after the fact. Im not a muslim btw, but an atheist. Both versions seem equally as ridiculous to believe to me. I mean, sure, if i had to chose i'd take the text that's closer to the supposed event, but both claims are based on pretty much no evidence whatsoever.

@John3.36

11 сағат бұрын

@@Yamyatos John, Luke, Mark, Matthew were not written anonymously. Look up Bart Ehrman.

Or they are both false duh.

You have no leg to stand on if u reject the crucifixion. Its historical fact whether u believe in God or not.

@innertuber4049

3 күн бұрын

It's actually not super solid, historically. We have the gospels, and we have highly corrupted transcripts from Josephus, and that's kinda it. I personally find those sufficient, but it is not unreasonable to assume there was a Christian conspiracy to create a martyr out of their teacher.

@HeresyInquisitor

Күн бұрын

@@innertuber4049 Again the keyword is “conspiracy” there, the whole argument would be a conspiracy without any historical backing or logical reasoning to explain why, if people make a claim they need to prove it one way or another.. personally the gospels and many other historical texts are enough? Since many other claims lack even that basic evidence lol

@innertuber4049

Күн бұрын

@@HeresyInquisitor well, the evidence there was conspiracy is inconsistencies in the account (as one commenter has been so gracious to point out in all the comment chains down here), lack of miracles manifest through Christian practices as had been claimed by Jesus, and the very real document doctoring that was done by the Church since very early on. It's unfortunate we don't have the Roman census data or legal records to back up the claims in the Gospels or Acts; you'd expect them to take pretty good notes on those kinds of things. That only Josephus remains as a record, a document we know was tampered with, can indeed be seen as an indication that the story was embellished and passed along by word of mouth. Much like Herodotus, Josephus often just wrote about the stories he had heard, so even if the crucifixion is original to his text it could've trickled down to him from Christian accounts.

I wasn't actually aware they claim he didn't actually die, and i immediately thought of a contradiction you didn't mention.. If they acknowledge he was at least a holy prophet, but he didn't die on the cross, but he WANTED to dupe people into thinking that he did. Isn't Islam going against his supposedly holy wishes of trying to deceive everyone?

This is absolutely true, after jesus died, his apostles went to different countries preaching gospel and one of them was mine!

I invite Muslims to actually read their Qur'an, because they say: "Bible and Torah were corrupted/changed by men." Which is in disagreement with their "Allah", who says: 1) "Torah and Bible are the word of God" (Surah 2:41, 3:3, 5:43-48). 2) "Words of God cannot be corrupted" (Surah 6:115, 18:27). 3) Jesus says "I am The Way, The Truth, and The Life. No man can come to the Father except through me" (Bible, John 14:6). 4) If you believe the Qu'ran, you must then believe the Bible, which then cancels the Qu'ran. God has given Muslims a way to escape, through study.

@uzls_4042

2 күн бұрын

First of all the bible is not the injil that is mentioned in the quran so not the same book and Surah 6:115 and 18:27 are both talking about the quran not any of the other books and is directed to our prophet Muhammad if you did you research you wouldn't have said that , after taking account of what I just said your whole argument crumbles and about john 14:6 It only would mean that at his time jesus was the only way to reach eternal life as to be a winner in the hereafter but It would have changed when the injil was corrupted and jesus was mistaken as god that is why Islam and muhammad became the new way to reach god

@JRJ15

2 күн бұрын

@@uzls_4042yeah it is the Injil because it can’t be changed if it’s the word of god 😂

@uzls_4042

2 күн бұрын

@@JRJ15 The quran doesn’t claim that other scriptures can’t be corrupted so the bible we have today isn’t in it’s original form

@JRJ15

2 күн бұрын

@@uzls_4042 yes, actually it is. Many people believe that we went from translation to translation thousands of times, when actually Greek speaking Jews in 180 BC translated the Hebrew Bible into Greek and that’s where we get the Bible of today. Don’t give me that the Bible has been corrupted nonsense. if it has the Quran is false because it says that the word of God cannot be corrupted. There’s no way for you to get past this.

@avaizadil1095

2 күн бұрын

@@JRJ15 Nope, the Quran doesn’t mention the Bible once. It mentions the Injil, which God gave directly to Christ (Quran 5:46). How could this be the Bible, when the Bible was written 40-60 years after Jesus ascended to Heaven?

It’s a nice argument, but the Quran is not an Islamic text, it’s a syriac Aramaic Christian text, probably also influenced by Nazarenes and ebionites, there were many Christian denominations in the Middle East, that believed in many aspects of christology different from Catholicism. Islam naturally involved out of them.

@jeffc5474

3 күн бұрын

No, the Quran is an Islamic text. It is where the Muslims go to justify their atrocities

Islam is to Christianity what Stephanie Meyer is to Tolkien.

I always wondered the epistemological implications of this. If God lies in this way (by creating an absolute illusion), then there is no way he is reliable, and if God is not reliable, what is?

In truth, Islamic theology is one of the weakest in the world. 😅

@user-jt8vj1vm6y

23 сағат бұрын

No theology is strong.

@mustafam.leathercoatv.2514

23 сағат бұрын

Is it because it want people to believe that God is an entity like humans who is the father and son of himself like a reference to "dark" series

@wildan.danial

19 сағат бұрын

Dude your religion has had thousands of sects over the years and alot of western "christians" are gay and liberal and stuff like that tbh i could keep giving more examples if u want. Wdym that our theology is weak

@briandiehl9257

18 сағат бұрын

@@wildan.danial Islam also has 1000s of sects, and is generally more divided then Christianity

Instead of the Crusades, the Pope should've just drawn the Caliph as a crying soyjack and himself as a gigachad

@bikesrcool_1958

Күн бұрын

We are going to need a new one soon, seeing how Muslims love to move onto Christian places

Not to mention the extra-Biblical sources that testified of Jesus' crucifixion and death. You don't have to use only the Bible as evidence that Jesus was killed by crucifixion. For the Koran to refute that fact, it would need to address the contemporary secular and Jewish historical accounts as well.

ALSO THE QARAN STATES, God's word cannot be corrupted, claim the bible as God's word, then say it was corrupted

@WhatHappenToMyComments

3 күн бұрын

so, do you still have the Gospel that was revealed to Jesus, the true words of God.. or are you blabbing about those numerous gospels written later by fallible men.?

@arabicv1nce531

3 күн бұрын

@@WhatHappenToMyComments gospel revealed to Jesus????? What are you blabbing about

@Gilded_07

23 сағат бұрын

​@@arabicv1nce531 The injeel that the quran refers to is the gospel REVEALED to jesus (pbuh) not the alleged recounts that are the gospels of the new testament. The verse that claims that God's word cannot be corrupted was talking in context of the Quranic revelation, which God made a promise to mankind that he will not allow it to be corrupted. He made no such promises for other scriptures