Obviously a genius. Not his native language, but he delivers a perfect speech with no notes and no filler words like "um" and "uh." Just precise thoughts conveyed clearly. Also the level of detail is just right for the audience, and nothing important is omitted. Imagine if the Russians had gotten him.

@joesiklosi5000

Жыл бұрын

They got his cousin.

@3isr3g3n

Жыл бұрын

It's quite shocking how our use of language seems to have degraded over the years.

@henryseidel5469

11 ай бұрын

Some Nazis were hanged in Nuremberg, some others flew to the moon. Great story...

Outstanding to hear the rocket pioneer himself explaning all the specific tasks. For me 5 of 5 Stars. Ecxellent film documentary.

@mikearthut781

4 жыл бұрын

. Excellent propaganda, maybe.. this is science FICTION. not truth.

@Patriotgal1

4 жыл бұрын

@@mikearthut781 LOL, you think the Moon isn't real, too?

@santinolarry4833

3 жыл бұрын

Pro trick: you can watch series at Flixzone. I've been using it for watching loads of movies these days.

@maddoxzain920

3 жыл бұрын

@Santino Larry Yea, been watching on Flixzone for months myself :D

@aidenkylo4349

3 жыл бұрын

@Santino Larry Definitely, I've been watching on Flixzone for since november myself :D

This man was a total genius!!

@Flightstar

3 жыл бұрын

I understand that he was tested to a partial genius, 137 parts to 149.

@animationspace8550

3 жыл бұрын

@@Flightstar What does that mean?

I used to live about two miles from the Armed Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia where this was filmed when I was in the Navy stationed at Naval Station Norfolk. Everything he's saying is simple science and physics, so most people should be able to follow this presentation without being lost because he thoroughly explained everything so that anyone could understand, so you don't need a PhD to understand this presentation.👍

@slow-mo_moonbuggy

Жыл бұрын

Outer space travel is 100% science fiction. All of it.

Dr. Strangelove comes to mind.

@octaviacoquus8857

3 жыл бұрын

Strangelove wasn't nearly as adorable as Wernher

@whereswaldo5740

3 жыл бұрын

They deleted the ending where he said And that all there is to say about that mein Fuhrer

@hertzair1186

3 жыл бұрын

He likely saved our ass from theRussians

@steven2212

3 жыл бұрын

@@hertzair1186 one of the greatest minds of the 20th century.

@alfredobowenbobenrieth7164

3 жыл бұрын

Glad we did not watch his arm rising up in the hitlerian salute and he punishing his arm as dr. Strangelove used to do... 🤣🤣😂🤔

Excellent treatise, first time I have heard Von Braun speak. Thanks for sharing.

@DaveSCameron

4 жыл бұрын

If you search him there's plenty of chat here including his Farewell speech, it certainly makes one feel we know more about such individuals doesn't it.

@bostedtap8399

4 жыл бұрын

@@DaveSCameron Thanks.

@Thneed2003

4 жыл бұрын

He's also on Disney's Man In Space. More in depth.

@tarstarkusz

4 жыл бұрын

Man was a damn hero!

@AaronTheGreat________

Жыл бұрын

@@tarstarkusz and a Nazi

I’m amazed by his speech. Anyone with even a cursory understanding of German knows about the F/V/W pronunciation differences… but he doesn’t slip up. He speaks very deliberately and with precision. He even mostly has the R at the end of English words as is common in most dialects. Aside from the pronunciation, just the vocabulary involved to give such a presentation on a technical topic without any bumbling or fumbling… it would be difficult as a native speaker to not slur something a little or misspeak in some way. Really astonishing the level of intelligence on display here.

@michaelward9880

2 жыл бұрын

Operation Paperclip's poster boy. No one can never deny his genius. When I was a kid I bought into the white washing of his Nazi past, thanks to Walt Disney and US Government. I believe Von Braun was a pragmatic man and he did what he had to do to earn his freedom and citizenship. I believe that he was a hardcore Nazi and probably harbored some resentment to his American masters for helping the USSR defeat his Homeland.

@hihihihihello

Жыл бұрын

Indeed

Absolutely awesome!!! His audience first seemed somewhat doubtful of this possibility... You could tell by the expression on their faces... Further into the presentation, the men seemed intensely interested into the advantages of what space exploration could do... Especially concerning military reconaissance...

A lot is made of von Braun's Nazi past. Willy Lay addressed part of it in "Rockets, Missiles and Outer Space". He said Himmler offered von Braun a major's commission in the SS. This was seen as a distraction by von Braun, but he feared Himmler's reaction if he declined. He polled his senior staff with the question '...what would happen to the rocket program if I accept the offer, and what if I declined?" The majority said "accept" He did. There is one picture of him in uniform, with Himmler striding in front of him. Wernher von Braun was ramrod straight, with a terrified look on his face. He addressed his work at Mittelwerk in a biography documentary. He told of being one of a group of senior staff forced to watch the execution of a randomly selected group of slaves. He said "A man with a gun stood in front, to the side, to make sure none of the witnesses looked away or closed his eyes." It was clear that the staff were as much slaves as the workers. It is easy to say " I'd never be part of that death machine." It''s different when one is engulfed in it. What would I do? I wish I could say.

Wow! Never actually heard him before. I love the way he words things, and explains things. Thank you for making this film available to see!

Its incredible that space technology still fundamentally to this day is based on Wernher's theories...

@sebastianmatz2828

3 жыл бұрын

thats the problem with impuls-reaction-drive. If we want to travel thro space seriously, we need a field-based-drive..

@stevelenores5637

3 жыл бұрын

The sad thing is that it is almost as if automobiles were powered with steam. Archaic technology.

@izzie9526

3 жыл бұрын

It's crazy how much spacex's starship idea mirrors the winged ship shown in the diagrams here. I wonder if they're taking direct notes

@stevelenores5637

3 жыл бұрын

@@izzie9526 I think you need a new eyeglass prescription. ROFL

@JamesHawkeYouTube

2 жыл бұрын

The sky is not "outer space". The old Nazi and his cronies were wrong.

"The missile would be...uhh... The ship would be" 9:56

@theoldar

4 жыл бұрын

A Dr Strangelove moment for sure.

@humpty4205

3 жыл бұрын

Old habits die hard.

@MrJm323

3 жыл бұрын

....And where it comes down is up to you!

@helisoma

2 ай бұрын

great catch oops 🙈😄

What a brilliant presentation and I believe most native English speakers would not do so well to explain what he did even today.

This idea was nicely reworked by Disney, with Dr. Von Braun, in the 3 part, Man in Space series.

Much of what Von Braun says about orbiting stations and even space suits trace back to Herman Potocnik's 1929 book, The Problem of Space Travel. Von Braun was a key figure in both the German WWII rocket program that attacked England, as well as later Cold War United States Apollo Moon race. This lecture was filmed before a man had ever been put into space, 1955, and before establishing of the NASA by President Eisenhower for peaceful civilian space exploration.

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

Before humans had put anything in orbit. This is two or three years before Sputnik.

@slow-mo_moonbuggy

Жыл бұрын

@@Mishn0 You're going to need to prove the radius value of the earth for that claim. The radius value has been debunked thousands of times. No radius value means they don't have a tangent point for the orbital telemetry. The jig is up. We know it's fake.

@Mishn0

Жыл бұрын

@@slow-mo_moonbuggy LOL, ignoring the fact that you can look at a website to find out when you can see the ISS passing by in its orbit overhead with your naked eyes...or, take a pair of binoculars out an hour or so after sunset and look up and see literally dozens of satellites in an hour or so... Why would you need to know the precise radius of the earth to be able to achieve orbit around this obviously spherical planet? If you're off by a little, it would change the orbital velocity and thus the values of apogee and perigee, but not whether you'd be able to get into orbit. I think you flattards are just trolling, no one could really be that dumb.

I grew up in Alabama and Wernher was a major figure in our Alabama History Classes. Remember when positive history was taught in public schools? Alabama gets little credit for development of missile and space technology but Huntsville's Red Stone Arsenal was on the forefront. I am proud to have Wernher as a citizen of the United States and Alabama.

@ChildovGhad

Жыл бұрын

Positive history is still taught in public schools. It's just that they also teach about some of the not so positive things so we don't repeat the same mistakes, and people who base their identities on those not so positive things don't like those not so positive things being portrayed as not so positive. People who ignore the positive history being taught and focus on the negative history are just upset that their toxic world view is being cast in a negative light.

@JoeOvercoat

Жыл бұрын

“positive history”? Newspeak, much?

@rickd650

Жыл бұрын

Any time I eat at Ol’ Heidelberg or Hildegard's I'm like God Bless Operation Paperclip. Meh. I like my schnitzel.

@kurtish9953

11 ай бұрын

@@JoeOvercoat I think a lot of history is positive, but not by our modern standards. A lot of history is about flawed people overcoming massive obstacles and trying to not be killed and tortured every step of the way. Granted, there is a lot of blatantly evil stuff that happens, but the survivors of most of these tragedies are examples of how strong the human spirit is. It takes a lot of effort to transcend bitter resentment and useless suffering, and we have many examples from every culture of the everyday heroes that have done it.

@dougball328

4 ай бұрын

If you really grew up in Alabama then you should know that it is Redstone (one word) not Red Stone.

I swear one of those officers is Gen. Curtis LeMay. He gets visibly excited every time Wernher Von Braun mentions the possibility of bombing ground targets from orbit.

@bobcoats2708

3 жыл бұрын

I agree. Sure looks like LeMay

@billw1266

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, it does at 23:13. He would have been about 49, if the film was done in 1955. Good catch, both of you!

@diceguyg3799

Жыл бұрын

@@billw1266 Nah....looks a bit like LeMay but not him. Freeze at that point and then look up LeMay image...he had closer set eyes and a more pronounced chin/lower jaw.

You can see where the DNA of the entire space program comes from in this one presentation. What a rockstar.

Very informative and at a level which is understandable. Thanks for posting this! 👍

Not a single yawn from the audience. No-one nodding off. No perplexed look. Total attention retained throughout the 30 minute lecture. Braun certainly had advanced knowledge of near space dynamics at the time. And given in excellent English. Impressive indeed.

@ronaldgarrison8478

Жыл бұрын

All that smoke was probably helping them to stay awake.

Werner Von Braun´s Tombstone has "Psalm 19:1" engraved on it: The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament shows his handiwork. Its the only thing which is added to his Tombstone besides his Name and Birth-Death date. Must be something important to him.

@cybercat1531

4 жыл бұрын

Hey look kids! It's a flattie!

@LiLi-or2gm

4 жыл бұрын

@@nyccollin You can't prove one thing you've said. But you go on ahead and live your make-believe life. No one takes you seriously.

@IronCypher

4 жыл бұрын

Balltards get worked up easy.

@LiLi-or2gm

4 жыл бұрын

@@IronCypher No one is more "worked up" than the flatties who keep trying to convince everyone they're right. No one with half a brain takes you guys and your make believe BS seriously.

@APMSPIRAL

4 жыл бұрын

@@cybercat1531 Utah salt FLATS 100s of miles of FLAT LANDS. Eye LEVEL water LEVEL sea LEVEL WHY ALL THE LEVELS use your God given senses The horizon is a HORIZONTAL LINE 360° always!!! lighthouse prove level earth Observable Testable Repeatable LEVELFACTS Shalom

I think that's Van Braun thru the smoke.

It’s interesting to note, they were well aware of the (100km) 60 mile Kármán line in 1955 even though man hadn’t reached space at that point.

@aarontrew1410

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, and the Nazis just all died off and disappeared in 1946.

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

Even the X-15 program, which first reached there, hadn't flown yet. And as von Braun predicted, they had to use thrusters, not wing control surfaces to orient their spacecraft.

🎯For me this is an Incredible video ! I love it ✌👨‍🏫👍

outstanding!!!

When people could smoke inside! Great video thanks for this gem!

Wernher von Braun's quote when the V2 rocket was first used was "The rocket worked perfectly, but it fell on the wrong planet." This was a reference to his desire to send rockets into space rather than for military purposes.... Then he also worked for Disney after he worked for nasa....

Only 10 years earlier Braun had very different associations. It's remarkable how 'forgiving' we can be.

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

Von Braun was more "amoral" than "immoral". He didn't care who was paying the bills, he didn't care about the "collateral damage" of slave labor, he didn't care about the "end user's" application of his work. He just wanted to be able to build rockets and advance the science of space flight. He wasn't a weapons builder, he was a space scientists who built weapons for the Nazis because that's where the easy money was. After the war the easy money was the US Army and later, NASA. The Army's Redstone rocket, which eventually launched Alan Shepard's first sub-orbital flight, was an only slightly improved V-2.

@willyD200

3 жыл бұрын

He wasn't the only nazi with nazi ideology the U.S. snagged during operation paper clip.

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

He was arrested by the SS at one point because they suspected he cared more about spaceflight with his rockets and developing weapons for the Reich. He was only eventually released because he was essential to the V-2 project... OL J R :)

@ChildovGhad

Жыл бұрын

Nuclear missiles were going to be a thing, and we wanted them first. End of story.

WE WOULD HAVE NEVER MADE IT WITHOUT HIM

Dr. Werner, rocked !

How did Von Braun acquirer all of this knowledge of space travel without any object ever leaving the earths atmosphere at the time of this lecture? Amazing!

@davidschwartz5127

4 жыл бұрын

@61gisele Thanks, He listed quite a few unknowns in hims lecture and it would have only taken 1 miscalculation for a major catastrophe to occur and this was back before computers as we know them. I guess the first Astronaut were much braver then I originally thought.

@johnp139

4 жыл бұрын

It’s called theoretic science.

Von Braun was a mad lad, casually expecting astronauts to pull 9 g's. Good thing the Apollo astronauts only had to endure about 4 g's lol

@Nangleator22

2 жыл бұрын

All about efficiency. Particularly if you're sitting a rocket down onto a planet or moon.

@tsfullerton

2 жыл бұрын

Mercury flights were up to nine g's.

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

To his credit he did say that the 9G was for sake of maximum efficiency and that lower G forces were doable with a "slight increase in the amount of fuel."

@tsfullerton

2 жыл бұрын

@@RockinRobbins13 Armstrong would have found that handy but he didn't need it.

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

@@tsfullerton Holy cow! I have no idea how many G's he pulled hooked to the mad Agena death machine, but it was more than 9.

He certainly knows his stuff, I was transfixed for 30 odd minutes. How did he know so much considering this was 1955.

@tsfullerton

2 жыл бұрын

Yes, Transfixed, that's what it was for me. It was much later when I saw him in person. My Sophomore year in college he came to speak on campus.

@MrGeoffHilton

2 жыл бұрын

@@tsfullerton a very good 'claim to fame' in my opinion, the only historical figure that I saw in person was Douglas Badar the legless fighter pilot from WW2. in the late 70s.

@booklover6753

2 жыл бұрын

His presentation illustrates the difference between a rocket scientist and the average human.

@tsfullerton

2 жыл бұрын

@@MrGeoffHilton Yes. Douglas Bader. I watched his documentary on the Heroes Channel and read him on Wiki.

@Kerithanos

2 жыл бұрын

Something about his eyes... hypnotic

I’m so happy to have found this video. It’s all theoretical at the time and seems like a pitch to the US Military Dragons Den for funding. The Chief German rocket scientist and SS officer who designed the V2 rocket that was used against the allied forces during WW2. He wasn’t tried as a war criminal but instead became director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center and the chief architect of the Saturn V launch vehicle, the superbooster that would propel Americans to the Moon. If I’d been there my hand would’ve been up in the air to ask all sorts of questions??? He talks about achieving a 60 mile high orbit and its complexities. Then the whole returning to Earth safely and it’s problems. The building of a space station that would be a Military surveillance point and bombing platform. You’ve got to give him credit pitching this futuristic technology. What better way to get funding than the promise of national security and the best weapon to defend yourself.

Wonderful

@PeriscopeFilm

2 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Cheers! Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm

This talk must have been a huge wake-up call for the assembled brass. Some of them were born and raised when airplanes were an exotic rarity. During their military careers they have seen air power become even more important than sea power, and science developing weapons beyond what their early 20th century education could comprehend. Future officers will need to lay in a lot of study of basic science in order to keep abreast of future strategic and tactical developments. ETA: OMG it's General Groves!

and one decade later, alexei leonov would live von braun's dream when he became the first man to go on a spacewalk, wearing the human-fitting suit that von braun dismissed as overly complex

Outer space was still a challenge... Because inner space was no problem.

@Firebrand55

3 жыл бұрын

10/10 for a very good comment; short, sweet and to the point...well said! How do I know?....I was there in the 50's, buying all von Braun Space Frontier books with Chesley Bonestell illustrations....still got them.

WVB: without wings, reentry will cause the capsule to burn up Heat shields: am I a joke to you?

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

Yup, he missed that one like Microsoft missed the Internet.

great!♡

when it got to the coke bottle spacesuit i was thinking 'wow, so werner vob braun is finally wrong ab something?' his foresight is astounding.

President Eisenhower refused to allow weapons in space, as described by Von Braun

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

Read the "Project Horizon" Air Force study from this approximate time period... USAF planning to build 12 man moon base and eventually put nuclear missiles on the Moon LOL:) It's online just got to use a search engine. Later! OL J R :)

SPACE FORCE GO!

WOW. I had to watch Dr. Strangelove after this.

THIS WAS GREAT!!!!! LOOK AT ALL THE SMOKE, IT WAS HORRIBLE, I WAS BORN IN 1943, SMOKING WAS EVERYWHERE. IN MY 79 YEARS OF LIFE, THE 3 MOST USELESS THINGS I HAVE EVER SEEN STUPID HUMANS DO IS: SMOKING, DRINKING AND DRUGS.

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

Yep now people drink like fish and they're legalizing weed left and right. I've read that a lot of companies are abandoning the weed legal states and relocating their businesses- tired of having to pay good for nothing stoners who won't work or are too stoned to do the job right, just tear stuff up and screw stuff up as much as they get done right... not worth it to them to stay there. In 10-15 years we'll have a health care "crisis" from all the burned out stoners coughing up lungs and their brains too burned out to take care of themselves, and too riddled with other health problems to be anything but a public health burden, while the weed states are suffering from massive cost overruns in public health trying to take care of them and massive funding shortfalls from loss of businesses and jobs. Then the gubmint will try to go the other way again and outlaw it and of course the genie will be out of the bottle and they'll have riots demanding it stay legal. SO stupid! Two things I can't stand-- d@mn worthless drunks and scumbag dope smokers... OL J R : )

The room is on fire!

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

This is before smoke detectors, obviously. Yikes! What a conflagration.

His english is remarkably good. I wonder if he found it annoying to use "miles per hour" instead of metric units.

Von Braun did some terrible things in his life but he also was most directly responsible for Apollo 10. That craft was the fastest object humans have ever traveled in to this day and it was 1969. 29.5k MPH.

@tsfullerton

2 жыл бұрын

What? Is that almost 30,000 mph? What?

Thanks for telling us Space was & is impossible!!! Still though to listen, 😅 if I laugh, I cry till I die 😅😅😅

@whirledpeas3477

Жыл бұрын

Is correct spelling and grammar impossible also?

Strange to hear Von Braun talk about military applications and bombing from space. I guess he really knew his target audiance?

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

He worked for the US Army. His audience was military big-wigs. Should von Braun have talked about Teflon? Armies kill people and break things. That was a part of what he talked about in this lecture tailored to fit his audience. Something wrong with that?

@jaminova_1969

Жыл бұрын

@@RockinRobbins13

@RockinRobbins13

Жыл бұрын

@@jaminova_1969 Von Braun was not a military man.

The diagram at 8:45-9:15 showing the orbit with apogee and perigee is wrong. In an elliptical orbit, the earth would be at one of the focal points of the ellipse, so it would be off-center. The apogee and perigee are on opposite sides of the orbit, not 90 degrees apart.

@TatevossianA

3 жыл бұрын

jmmahony - Both focal points would be inside the Earth.

@jmmahony

3 жыл бұрын

@@TatevossianA They can be, but one would be at (or very near) the center of the earth. Strictly speaking, when one object orbits another, both are actually orbiting the CG of the system, but when one of those objects is vastly more massive than the other, the larger object barely moves, and the other object is on an elliptical orbit, with one focal point essentially at the location of the other object. Whether the other focal point is inside the larger object is just a question of how elliptical the orbit is, how large that orbit is, and how large the larger object is. When a comet comes into the inner solar system, that is just one part (the perihelion) of a long elliptical orbit, most of which (including the far point, or apehelion) is beyond Neptune. So the other focal point is waaaay outside the sun.

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

@@jmmahony It's an illustration for mere mortals. Not Kerbal experts.

@jmmahony

3 жыл бұрын

@@Mishn0 The majority of people watching this video are likely interested in space travel, and the point being discussed is a pretty basic aspect of orbital mechanics and "rocket science 101". The diagram is blatantly wrong, and would be confusing for anyone just learning the subject, so I thought it was worth pointing out. Now that I've explained my motivation for posting my comment, what was the motivation for your response?

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

@@jmmahony The film was't produced for people that have been exposed to space travel for 70 years. It was produced for those military officers who had never been exposed to this, because NO ONE had ever been exposed to this, because this hadn't existed before. I'm pointing this out because your comment is completely irrelevant to why this video was made. The reason you posted this is to enable you to show us all how frigging smart you are. Period. Here's another clue, we don't care.

WERNHER VON BRAUN Book: "I Aim For The Stars.......But Sometimes I Miss and Hit London"

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

The SS arrested him at one point, because they figured he was more interested in space than military applications of his rockets and missiles. They only released him because he was essential to the V-2 project. OL J R :)

@ 22:16 look at that little side glance from the military dude XD

@michaelmccarthy4615

4 жыл бұрын

In 1955 those film cameras were gigantic on heavy tripods. He felt the camera swing to focus on him....

@APMSPIRAL

4 жыл бұрын

I seen same...even earlier though when Von said bullet would follow the curvature of the earth. Lol when they all know its level!!! Shalom

@bonkers4469

4 жыл бұрын

Hahahahahaha

American officers taking a lecture from an officer in the SS. How quickly forgotten.

@moggridge1

4 жыл бұрын

Frankly, I was disappointed he didn't discuss the exploitation of concentration camp labour in inhuman conditions as part of this 🙁 Perhaps he forgot? Or, maybe that was all somebody else's fault?

@patrickperry6945

4 жыл бұрын

Tumbril It’s called pragmatism.

@tarstarkusz

4 жыл бұрын

@@moggridge1 There was virtually no discussion of any such thing at this time. The kvetching about Auschwitz didn't start until later. It really wasn't until the later part of the 60s that anyone cared about this stuff, mostly because that is around the time Jews began to have a big presence in the academy.

@XKK85

3 жыл бұрын

Future history teacher, he

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

If he was an "officer in the SS" it was because he had to be in order to build rockets. He didn't want to kill the Jews, he just didn't care if they were killed if that got him the funding. Not a ringing endorsement of his morals, but a point to consider. He thought space was more important than some random people he didn't know. I bet that's how a lot of scientists are if they aren't under public scrutiny.

So it , Is, What you know . As well as, Who you know.

A book entitled American Astronauts and Spacecraft was a pictorial work about the American astronauts and their spacecraft.

“The missile would b- uh…the ship” 😂

Lecturing thru the Van Allen belt's nicotine layer.

He is so young here.

I Feels Very Luckey to See him in this Video.

The conquest of space zo ve can spread ze master race er um I mean ze Democracy und ze American flag ya.

9:35 "Smoke 'em if you got 'em, men"

@Flightstar

3 жыл бұрын

That's comical. Looks like the room is on fire.

Don't say that he's hypocritical Say rather that he's apolitical "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down? That's not my department!" says Wernher von Braun -Tom Lehrer, "Wernher von Braun"

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

Every German military man had to do his duty. That is not a crime. The criminals were the Nazis in control.

He kept going back and forth between FPS and mph.

Why is the velocity needed to maintain a high orbit lower than that needed to maintain a low orbit?

@GuitarMAXMusic

2 жыл бұрын

Because the pull of gravity is weaker the higher you go.

The shape of the rocket is elegant for the observer but unsound. Cylinders are structurally more stable. The pictures were strictly for the public.

@22:12 Yikes...... Listen the the military/strategic sales pitch WVB gives to the military brass in the room. Old habits die hard....

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

The military were the ones with the budget. Civilian industry would never fund the work he wanted to do.

@sierramike5259

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah...I wonder how many of those guys in the room flew B-17 missions with the 8th AF into Germany.....it had to be weird...

Interesting that the rest of the presentation is cut off….

hey nice ksp tutorial

he doesn't state the amount of fuel needed for deceleration for the return flight into the atmosphere if you have a winged aircraft.

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

Probly one of the things still to be worked out. They didn't know EVERYTHING in '55! Basically you just have to slow down enough to put the perigee of the orbit down into the deeper parts of the atmosphere, air drag will do the rest. Theoretically if you retroburned your engine long enough, you could drop back into the atmosphere without a heat shield-- but it would basically take almost as much fuel as it took to put you into orbit in the first place! Conservation of momentum and energy transfer and all that. Later! OL J R: )

17:00 A pack of light ciaretttes.

@patrickperry6945

4 жыл бұрын

kpkndusa No such thing when this was made. “Light” cigarettes, that is.

The slim Redstone and towering Atlas, Titan and Saturn rockets that lifted the American astronauts were used from May nineteen sixty one to July nineteen seventy five.

Everything he said has come to pass, that's quite a feat considering in 1955, that was far before sputnik and state of the art then was just suborbital en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1955_in_spaceflight The only thing that didn't happen was the actual type of craft made to realize his vision. He goes from space flight, planetary exploration, space station, space telescope for astronomy and earth surveillance, space biology research and materials research, all integral to all space agencies today, worldwide.

@ChildovGhad

Жыл бұрын

Is 2 years really "far before"? The Soviets were already taking space a lot more seriously by the time this was filmed, that's why they shocked the world with Sputnik only 2 years after this film, and launched a probe at the moon only 2 years after that, despite the USA having far more funding.

Incredible the smoke of cigarettes... now I understand why Werner died of cancer at a relatively young age. .. 🤔

@richardkirka5977

3 жыл бұрын

There was also an admiral with a seegar. Flag officers had a floor ashtray between chairs, with lower-ranked officers using a regular ashtray or empty coffee cup in their laps. Smoking was catered-to in just about every aspect of society aside from combustible atmospheres and SOME medical facilities.

Hilarious... Von Braun was a fantastic comedian! :-D

9:00 That diagram of apogee and perigee is incorrect. I assume von Braun was not the illustrator, no way he'd have made such an obvious mistake.

@warfyaa6143

Жыл бұрын

I just saw the diagram Yes, the diagram is faulty .

i am sorry to interrupt herr von braun, but what the hell is that earth central elliptical orbit with perigee and apogee being 90 degrees from each other?!

How many of these soldiers understood him fully?

Smokem if you gottem, bummem if you don't!

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

It sure was a different time!

"and possibly even as a bombing-platform". Just what we need!

1955? ,No habían lanzado siquiera el primer satélite al espacio y estaban hablando de militarizarlo.

He perfectly predicted the famous VOMIT COMET.

1:17 this is funny

Where were the students?

WOW @27:27 A space station made from RUBBER WOW

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

And just now is being realized as an addition to the ISS. It's up there and functioning now. Bigelow is the company that did it.

@jimurrata6785

Жыл бұрын

@@RockinRobbins13 Bigelow is bankrupt now. Their ideas for inflatable habitats seem to have worked.

And people still believe there is an "outer space".

Probably missed an opportunity to advise that if we can put bombs in orbit, then other countries will also eventually do so. Therefore, maybe its not a good idea to do that...

19:55

As a enclosed domer I find this interesting 👍😁

@LiLi-or2gm

4 жыл бұрын

Everyone else finds you boorish and stupid.

@APMSPIRAL

4 жыл бұрын

@@LiLi-or2gm how rude...least they know the realm they reside.

@APMSPIRAL

4 жыл бұрын

The moon is inside with us!!! Sun 2

@erastusturnipseed1097

4 жыл бұрын

@@LiLi-or2gm I disagree and don't attempt to speak for me, Li Li, you troll. I find Wrel Rel much more interesting and capable of independent thought than you who I find to be a simple, narrow-minded slave who regurgitates what you are told and thinks what your masters tell you to think.

@LiLi-or2gm

4 жыл бұрын

@@erastusturnipseed1097 Oh, aren't you the salty one! Of course you find this BS interesting- you have no real understanding of physical phenomena. You probably find all kinds of other silly crap to be "interesting."

the missile UHH I MEAN the ship would be...... nice try Von Braun.

@booklover6753

2 жыл бұрын

Our first manned flights were in ballistic missiles.

@RockinRobbins13

2 жыл бұрын

At the time there was little distinction between missile and rocket. They were interchangeable terms. This is the time they diverged, thanks to Dwight Eisenhower's initial requirement that manned space be a civilian enterprise. That failed and von Braun, working for the Army, snatched our cookies out of the fire and prevented us from experiencing utter failure. Good on him. This video shows how essential he was to technologies which saved millions of lives so far and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Von Braun stands entirely vindicated by his redemptive efforts after the war. Salute!

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

@@RockinRobbins13 True, but NASA wouldn't be formed until the Space Act of 1958, well after Sputnik and mostly as a response to it. Eisenhower knew the military saw space as "the next high ground" and were all over it, fighting their usual turf wars. Eisenhower and the brass basically gave the first orbital satellite mission to the Naval Research Lab's "Vanguard" rocket, because it was being conducted by an all-American team. The Army's team was Von Braun and his Germans working at Redstone Arsenal for DARPA. Von Braun had been capable of inserting a small payload into orbit for some time by the fall of 1957, using his "Jupiter C" rocket which was a modified Redstone with a couple of aggregate solid propellant Sergeant rocket motor upper stages, which was being used to launch various reentry vehicle shapes and materials on suborbital trajectories, then using the upper stages to DRIVE them back down at extremely high speeds into the atmosphere to develop heat shield technology for ICBM warheads. There was a LOT of experimental work going on at the time and nobody was quite sure how to do it. The brass had forbidden Von Braun's team from attempting an orbital launch, to permit the Naval Research Lab team time to finish their Vanguard and launch it, per their orders from upstairs. IIRC they even short-fueled Von Braun's Jupiter-C launches to prevent the possibility of it "accidentally" going into orbit. OF course the Soviets caught them off guard with Sputnik 1, some said Eisenhower DELIBERATELY allowed the Soviets to launch a satellite first in order to establish the "freedom of the skies" doctrine, that a satellite in orbit can overfly a country without violating their "airspace" like an aircraft overflight would, so that the coming age of spy satellites couldn't be complained about as a violation of their airspace or whatever... It's a rather flimsy argument with no supportive evidence that I've seen, but the argument or reason is valid enough, but I'm of the opinion "never contribute to secret activities motivated by uncommon insight what is more readily explained by pure happenstance". At any rate, the Soviets got to orbit first, and the NRL's Vanguard rocket famously exploded on the pad after a lifting off a few feet and falling back, in the famous "Flopnik" or "Kaputnik" fiasco in front of the world press. After that Eisenhower reluctantly turned Von Braun's team loose to put up a US satellite as soon as possible, which became Explorer 1, which discovered the Van Allen Radiation Belts nobody knew were there. Eisenhower had held them back in the first place because he didn't like how it would look in the world press to have the first US satellite put up by a "German" team, though most had become US citizens by that time (including Von Braun who basically led the others to do so by example). Eisenhower would have preferred it be an "All American" team to get the credit for the first satellite, as it would make better press. BUT the NRL's failure with Vanguard left him with basically no choice-- better a German emigre American team put up a satellite than NO US satellite AT ALL. Sputnik had created quite a stir in the US and led to the conclusion (erroneous) that there was a missile gap and the Soviets were ahead technologically and the US had fallen behind and education was insufficiently rigorous and not preparing students for the challenges of the future to prevent a "Red World" and all sorts of basically hysteria... though a lot of good came out of it in the end. BUT it was all a lot of unpleasant noise to the politicians at the time, some of whom made a lot of hay out of it (including Kennedy in his Presidential bid against Nixon in 1960). Later! OL J R :)

@RockinRobbins13

Жыл бұрын

@@lukestrawwalker _"some said Eisenhower DELIBERATELY allowed the Soviets to launch a satellite first in order to establish the "freedom of the skies" doctrine, that a satellite in orbit can overfly a country without violating their "airspace" like an aircraft overflight would, so that the coming age of spy satellites couldn't be complained about as a violation of their airspace or whatever... It's a rather flimsy argument"_ But your position here is internally inconsistent. First you say _"Von Braun had been capable of inserting a small payload into orbit for some time by the fall of 1957,"_ And that totally undermines your second contention that the legal aspect was just a "flimsy excuse." And although you contend _"no supportive evidence that I've seen"_ but the entire issue was conducted in public at the United Nations. During the International Geophysical Year, the US and USSR were committed to launching satellites. However, the Russians, at the United Nations raised the point that under international law, property rights extended from their borders on the ground upwardly an infinite distance in altitude, therefore any overflights by satellite over the USSR would have grave consequences. This was the impetus for the formation of NASA, a completely civilian (American had nothing to do with it. NASA also used foreigners, especially Canadians) agency, and the Vanguard team was an entirely civilian effort. Avoiding the appearance of a military satellite was of prime importance, something that was also repeatedly on the six o'clock news. Even a civilian satellite would encounter international law trespass problems, so Eisenhower DID make the conscious decision to let the Russians launch first, since they were the sponsor of the "overflights are illegal" argument. If the Soviets overflew the US and we made no claim of trespass, then the law would have to change and the Russians couldn't protest, since it was THEIR satellite doing the trespassing. This aerospace historian, Amy Shira Teitel, can clear up any discrepancies if I've got anything wrong. Basically Eisenhower had proposed an international treaty designating the space above countries to be considered open, with overflight by both countries to allow reconnaissance as a means of opening up information on the activities of both sides as a way of promoting peace instead of paranoia. The Soviets vigorously opposed that concept, closing down America's ability to orbit a spacecraft first. Allowing the Soviets to do it first would tie their hands and keep them from arguing against it. This video covers that, although not covering American space policy in the late 50's in as detailed a manner as her other video I watched, but can't seem to find right now. kzread.info/dash/bejne/YqR3maOaY9aWYLw.html However this video lays out the facts that required the Soviets to orbit first. Interestingly, much is made about the failure of Vanguard and Von Braun "saving the day." But Sputnik was ALSO the Soviet backup plan! kzread.info/dash/bejne/moKDtqmEZdWnd7Q.html

Weight and weightlessness .... essentially we feel "weight" on the Earth's surface because due to the mass of the Earth space is being warped or some shit and we're being accelerated. My best friend's a rocket scientist and he can explain how magnets work and not just that "there's a north pole and a south pole" pabulum but really how they work ... it involves warping of space or some kind of relativistic shit too ... frankly it makes my head hurt, I guess it's to be expected as I flunked 2nd semester calc twice and gave up after that.

At the end of his Nazi spiel, Dr. Strangelove stood up and loudly proclaimed to President Merkin... "Mien Fuhrer - I can WALK!"

Nice freudian slip 9:55

@Mishn0

3 жыл бұрын

Yes and no. If you put people in a missile, it's a ship. "Missile" doesn't mean "weapon". It means "flying object".

@DannyTruthMagnified

2 жыл бұрын

Great catch. In order for something to be a missle it needs a target. And it ultimately needs to end it's trajectory by hitting that target.

The Russians must had got some pretty good scientists out of the deal, as they were out the gate early in the space race.

@TheAnubis57

3 жыл бұрын

I'm sure Stalin made an offer they couldn't resist. Don't forget communists are one mindedness --they are not burdened by public opinion. Look at communist China's ever growing power expansion even is space expiration and look at us --worried about genderless bathrooms, sex reassignment in the military, the monetary burden of illegal immigration, etc. --too many distractions.

@lukestrawwalker

Жыл бұрын

They had Von Braun's equal genius in Sergei Korolev. In some ways Korolev was more genius than Von Braun. While the Soviets did round some some second-rate German V-2 people that were communists or socialists and didn't want to work for the Americans, and took them back to Moscow where they were cloistered in their own lab because Stalin was paranoid about "counter-revolutionary ideas" where they worked on the V-2 stuff the Soviets managed to scavenge from Germany and Poland after the war, building and flying a handful of V-2's and demonstrating the technology for the Soviets (including Korolev), when they tried to put forward ideas for improved V-2's and new rockets, they were rebuffed-- Korolev and Glushko and the other Soviet "chief designers" already had their own ideas and soon were flying their own Soviet home-built version of the V-2 (called the R-2) and looking far beyond it to more improvements they had in mind and soon put into practice. They were the first to figure out that if you separated the warhead from the missile after engine burnout it was a h3ll of a lot more accurate, so that's one of the first big improvements they made, and soon their R-5 missiles were flying and the R-7 Semyorka became their first ICBM, which also was used to orbit the Sputniks and other satellites, the first manned spacecraft, Vostock, and still is flying to this day in evolved form as the "Soyuz launcher", the US astronauts only way into space from shuttle retirement in 2011 until SpaceX Crew Dragon launches started a few years back. OL J R :)

"Our Nazis are better than their Nazis" LOL

At the very start of the lecture the senior officer is seen walking to the front, also in view are the officers making up the audience. A quick comparison of those present suggests they all appear to be of roughly the same height and build, slightly receding and look very alike to one another. Rocket Man Van Braun shares not a single likeness and may as well be from a different planet. Why present what is undoubtedly a complicated set of technical sciences in the most basic dumbed down level possible? Clearly this production was built for purpose, convincing the general public to adopt their rocket reality. From satellites to space and all the things inbetween, their programmes our programming. 'Watch the birdie' is akin to 'have a gander at the prop' and serve as 'targeted suggestive' propaganda.

@MommaLousKitchen

3 ай бұрын

Thier lead propaganda guy took himself and six kids out....sad.

Von braum..... funda-mental proyect?? Oooouuyeaahhhh beeee beeee beeeeeeee, jjjjjjjjj

@whirledpeas3477

2 жыл бұрын

Fetal alcohol syndrome?

Sometimes you aim for the moon and hit London 😅

Room full of masons with Disney illustrations.

@bonkers4469

4 жыл бұрын

For real!!! Nothing but the same explanations and lame cartoon slide shows

@mikearthut781

4 жыл бұрын

yip.

He obviously knows what he is talking about; he has no notes. I don't know how he could be in the same room with all that cigarette smoke being blown in his face. This sounds like it was before NASA, before October 1958. It would have been handy to have a space station that would revolve and produce it's own gravity, but the cost would be exponential.