The Calculus You Need

MIT RES.18-009 Learn Differential Equations: Up Close with Gilbert Strang and Cleve Moler, Fall 2015
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/RES-18-009F15
Instructor: Gilbert Strang
The sum rule, product rule, and chain rule produce new derivatives from known derivatives. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus says that the integral inverts the derivative.
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu

Пікірлер: 115

  • @SebastianLopez-nh1rr
    @SebastianLopez-nh1rr8 жыл бұрын

    The quotient rule: "Who can remember that?!" It made me laugh hahaha

  • @user-ss5su1rc6v

    @user-ss5su1rc6v

    7 жыл бұрын

    korean high school students: we remember it damn it!!

  • @Alberpinypon

    @Alberpinypon

    7 жыл бұрын

    It is just a joke man! Take it easy

  • @thomasr.7579

    @thomasr.7579

    7 жыл бұрын

    Sebastián López composite function..

  • @Skrzelik

    @Skrzelik

    7 жыл бұрын

    "low d high minus high d low square the bottom and a way we go" I think you can remember that :) (Yes I know I'm answering after almost a year)

  • @f.easulin3091

    @f.easulin3091

    7 жыл бұрын

    after 10 years, can remeber, my teacher thought it would be funny to sing it..

  • @owen7185
    @owen7185 Жыл бұрын

    Prof Strang has inspired me to be as good as possible in everything I want to achieve

  • @Os_Bosniak
    @Os_Bosniak7 жыл бұрын

    Dear mister Strang it is a great pleasure watch this video series. You are enlighten this hard and very non intuitive stuff. Thank You a very, very much. Great greeting from Bihac, and i wish to You only best wishes.

  • @hannslunninger416
    @hannslunninger4162 жыл бұрын

    Diese Videos zeigen eindrucksvoll, was einen guten Lehrer ausmacht: 1. Fachkompetenz 2. Fachkompetenz 3. Fachkompetenz 4. die Liebe zum Fach und das Bedürfnis, dieses Wissen - und vor allem worauf es ankommt - weiterzugeben. Die Methode dazu ergibt sich unter diesen Voraussetzungen ganz natürlich von selbst. Great praise and many thanks!

  • @bernardoborges8598

    @bernardoborges8598

    2 жыл бұрын

    Auch Fachkompetenz nicht vergessen

  • @loden5677
    @loden56772 жыл бұрын

    I really love this lecturer he has such an effective and refreshingly succinct way of delivering the content!!

  • @kingsnowy3037
    @kingsnowy30374 жыл бұрын

    "That's called the Taylor series. Named after Taylor." I love this.

  • @CatsBirds2010
    @CatsBirds20107 жыл бұрын

    I am so very thankful to this guy that can't express with words.

  • @bunkydunk7500
    @bunkydunk7500 Жыл бұрын

    So good I need to watch them again and take notes. I am truly inspired by his excellent explanations.

  • @bobnash79
    @bobnash798 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for sharing this video...lots of sleeping connections in my brain started sparkling again :-)I like very much the visualisation of the taylor serie . Very clear!

  • @Sinusis
    @Sinusis8 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for this beautiful enlightening lecture.

  • @JawharBacha
    @JawharBacha8 жыл бұрын

    Dr Gilbert Strang is just my saver as always ! Thank you very much

  • @JohnnyYenn
    @JohnnyYenn7 жыл бұрын

    The sound errors are absolutely driving me nuts! :(

  • @astropgn
    @astropgn4 жыл бұрын

    I never had a good understanding of the Taylor series. For me it was kind of magic. I probably missed the lecture when my professor gave it to me, but I am inclined to say that actually I was there but the class wasn't that good, unfortunately. His small description of what the taylor series is was so useful I am now wanting to learn about it by myself just because it made so much sense

  • @smedleybelkin19

    @smedleybelkin19

    21 күн бұрын

    Our first year lecturer showed us it and then moved right on saying it’s obvious to you all… it wasn’t.

  • @Le_Parrikar
    @Le_Parrikar6 жыл бұрын

    wow. This provided a completely new perspective for me.

  • @alexeisirotinin3590
    @alexeisirotinin35906 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, Mr. Strang.

  • @UnforsakenXII
    @UnforsakenXII8 жыл бұрын

    Is it me or is there a little bit of sound errors?

  • @thebigVLOG

    @thebigVLOG

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Andres It's definitely you, Strang doesn't make mistakes.

  • @UnforsakenXII

    @UnforsakenXII

    8 жыл бұрын

    I meant like the audio. I think it was my headphones. Lol.

  • @thebigVLOG

    @thebigVLOG

    8 жыл бұрын

    The muffled sounds is there on purpose, Strang was just testing his students. BTW, I've been joking :p

  • @SilverArro

    @SilverArro

    8 жыл бұрын

    +Andres It's not just you. There are several sound skips.

  • @loganborghi5727

    @loganborghi5727

    7 жыл бұрын

    i swear, you are watching this video too? lol

  • @MisterBinx
    @MisterBinx5 жыл бұрын

    I got a C in diff eq but I want to have a deeper understanding. I hope these videos help.

  • @qzorn4440
    @qzorn44407 жыл бұрын

    this is the real Dr. Who can teach Calculus. thanks.

  • @bd_harold7752
    @bd_harold77528 ай бұрын

    He is one of the best professor.

  • @sravanvurlugonda2871
    @sravanvurlugonda28712 жыл бұрын

    just listening lecture and out of the blue comes " this is taylors series" shocked and amazed to know the essence and meaning of taylors series. all these days taylors series i just use to mug up. Thanks a lot Mr.Gilbert strang🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @mrblini
    @mrblini6 жыл бұрын

    This guy is a true professor

  • @andrewlee7307
    @andrewlee73078 жыл бұрын

    Great course, never view differential equations that way!

  • @randallyoung6715
    @randallyoung67152 ай бұрын

    This guy was (and is) a star.

  • @kpgreen1015
    @kpgreen10156 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for your lecture.

  • @TheFrygar
    @TheFrygar5 жыл бұрын

    Strang is truly a legend among mere mortals

  • @guliyevshahriyar
    @guliyevshahriyar8 ай бұрын

    Thanks so much, professor!

  • @ichoine
    @ichoine8 жыл бұрын

    Love the way you explain things :))

  • @elamvaluthis7268
    @elamvaluthis72683 жыл бұрын

    How great and how nice explanation?

  • @user-zf4zb8vx7d
    @user-zf4zb8vx7d3 жыл бұрын

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Differential equations. Thanks Doctor ...

  • @Fabsurf101
    @Fabsurf1013 жыл бұрын

    Great prof!

  • @HH-wh1kh
    @HH-wh1kh4 жыл бұрын

    BEST MATH TEACHER !!!

  • @AliVeli-gr4fb
    @AliVeli-gr4fb7 жыл бұрын

    I thank you, sir

  • @verofalcon8443
    @verofalcon84434 жыл бұрын

    Conciso, claro.

  • @abidalrk4432
    @abidalrk44326 жыл бұрын

    there is one thing that bothered me abt taylor series , isn't the t+∆t should be t'+∆t and ∆t=t-t' (with t' a real number) , cause when want define Taylor series for a function , we do it in a neighberhood of a point t' , any way the notations that i wrote seems more logical than the other , am i right ?

  • @AndreOliveira-ol3cy
    @AndreOliveira-ol3cy4 жыл бұрын

    Oh man, I'm in love with these classes. Dr. Strang, I hope someday I'll be just as half as good as you as a professor. I'll then know that am an awesome teacher! Thank you very much!

  • @kingsnowy3037

    @kingsnowy3037

    4 жыл бұрын

    Holup now. Dr. Strang? I can't believe I've never thought of his name with his honorific. That's funny. Dr. Strang. Sorcerer Supreme.

  • @rafaelsouza4575
    @rafaelsouza45752 ай бұрын

    where do the denominators from the Taylor series terms come from?

  • @dalyd12
    @dalyd126 жыл бұрын

    This is great

  • @sureshkumarsahu5010
    @sureshkumarsahu50105 жыл бұрын

    Thanx professor strang

  • @Alberpinypon
    @Alberpinypon7 жыл бұрын

    Can anyone clarify why he took e^t out of the integral? Isn't it required to be a constant for being taken off an integral?

  • @VidsAccount123

    @VidsAccount123

    7 жыл бұрын

    e^t-s can be rewritten as (e^t)/(e^s) because of the quotient rule of exponents. Therefore the e^t can be take out as a constant, and he left e^-s for simplicity instead of writing 1/(e^s)

  • @TheCesarcastro

    @TheCesarcastro

    7 жыл бұрын

    He took e^t out of the integral because the variable in which you are integrating is "s" not "t", so you can consider "t" or any function of "t" as a constant, so you can take it out of the integral.

  • @Alberpinypon

    @Alberpinypon

    7 жыл бұрын

    Lol, so true, thanks for the feedback guys!

  • @Fr3Eze1992
    @Fr3Eze19928 жыл бұрын

    holy shit that equation at 7:50 blew my mind

  • @tiagozibecchi3634
    @tiagozibecchi3634 Жыл бұрын

    EXCELLENT

  • @Sahilbc-wj8qk
    @Sahilbc-wj8qk5 жыл бұрын

    Amazing finely last point get a real thing for me.

  • @timdong2147
    @timdong21474 жыл бұрын

    At 7:50, why did he substitute s with t, giving e^t. Shouldn’t it be e^s? What about e^0?

  • @ankanbiswas2854
    @ankanbiswas28547 жыл бұрын

    @7:20 shouldn't it be e^(-t)[ e^(-t).g(t) - e^0.g(0)]? is it just convinient to ignore e^0.g(0) because it is convinient here?

  • @user_golden

    @user_golden

    Жыл бұрын

    No, it is not correct the way you write it. There is no e^0.g(0) term there.

  • @DosVulcanianos
    @DosVulcanianos4 жыл бұрын

    Amazing, but I didn´t undernstand why dissapiar the g(s) and it became in g(t). I beleave that is related with the intregral from 0 to t, but can anyone give any clue? thank a lot

  • @haroonhafeez2368

    @haroonhafeez2368

    4 жыл бұрын

    Because of limit. Its limit was from 0 to "t"

  • @ahmedismail1018
    @ahmedismail10187 жыл бұрын

    i love u MIT

  • @bilalabbad7954
    @bilalabbad79542 жыл бұрын

    Thank lot

  • @rainuriftiannehziraelwance9582
    @rainuriftiannehziraelwance95825 жыл бұрын

    the Calculus you need e - x insteresting what informations different equastion not everythings all detail.

  • @asdfafafdasfasdfs
    @asdfafafdasfasdfs11 ай бұрын

    7:33 shouldn't the first term be y(t)?

  • @zeeshan3dge
    @zeeshan3dge7 жыл бұрын

    great...

  • @companymen42
    @companymen42 Жыл бұрын

    Ow my ears. MIT please fix your audio

  • @Priapos93
    @Priapos932 жыл бұрын

    Timeless

  • @BuddyNovinski
    @BuddyNovinski6 жыл бұрын

    When I took differential equations at Penn State back in 1976, this is how the professor should have introduced them, along with the suggestion to practice the equations as much as possible!

  • @is-ig4zh
    @is-ig4zh4 жыл бұрын

    This is my first time seeing big chalk.

  • @joeewert4503
    @joeewert45033 жыл бұрын

    No sound errors on 1.25 speed :) Maybe the ML speedup algorithm filters out the noise. EDIT nvm it only did it with the first scratch.

  • @Suiiiiiiiiiiiiiii1

    @Suiiiiiiiiiiiiiii1

    2 жыл бұрын

    Lol you are right

  • @carlostonchee3393
    @carlostonchee33938 жыл бұрын

    Why are you using the Laplace transform of the function instead of the time domain function?

  • @kvlpnd

    @kvlpnd

    8 жыл бұрын

    because after transferring to s domain, calculations become very easy.

  • @kvlpnd

    @kvlpnd

    8 жыл бұрын

    also we can use as many domains on a single equation but can't really process them simultaneously. That's why he put the terms instead of processing.

  • @carlostonchee3393

    @carlostonchee3393

    8 жыл бұрын

    Ohh thanks Keval Pandya​

  • @GrimKage
    @GrimKage2 жыл бұрын

    7:15 why did the s turn in to t when you derived the integral??

  • @Adithyaflute

    @Adithyaflute

    2 жыл бұрын

    limits applied. so it turned into t

  • @FernandoVinny
    @FernandoVinny6 жыл бұрын

    7:15 isn't exp(-s)q(s) ???

  • @mahalingama4162

    @mahalingama4162

    3 жыл бұрын

    same doubt

  • @nicholasesposito1212
    @nicholasesposito12123 жыл бұрын

    The calculus you deserve. But not the calculus you need right now

  • @lavieestlenfer
    @lavieestlenfer7 жыл бұрын

    Why do the s terms become t terms?

  • @robertw2930

    @robertw2930

    6 жыл бұрын

    Does it have to do with speed or time or just t for taylor?

  • @guilhermesilva3415

    @guilhermesilva3415

    6 жыл бұрын

    that's what the fundamental theorem of calculus says(you might wanna check it out), if you're taking de derivative of an integral ( integral of "e" to the "t") evaluated from 0 to "x", then the derivative is what is "inside" the integral evaluated in "X". "e^x". fundamental theorem of calculus.

  • @mikej3555
    @mikej3555 Жыл бұрын

    3:42

  • @hrperformance
    @hrperformance Жыл бұрын

    7:40 why are we treating q(s) as a function of t?

  • @hywelgriffiths5747

    @hywelgriffiths5747

    Жыл бұрын

    It's what he says on the previous board (3:00) when talking about the fundamental theorem: inside the integral we use a dummy variable that can be anything - the actual variable that the integral is a function of appears in the limit (the x at the top of the integral sign).

  • @hrperformance

    @hrperformance

    Жыл бұрын

    @@hywelgriffiths5747 thank you 👍🏼

  • @azamatdevonaev1772
    @azamatdevonaev17724 жыл бұрын

    I wonder what to say or not to say if I find those guys that disliked the video...

  • @kvlpnd
    @kvlpnd8 жыл бұрын

    oh my poor internet speed. :(

  • @MaterJediAnakinSkywalker
    @MaterJediAnakinSkywalker9 ай бұрын

    he is blinking me

  • @Lampeaoo
    @Lampeaoo7 жыл бұрын

    Man, I was watching differencial equations and the video came later was that... that is way before than DE. It would be perfect if the video was being put in the right order :(

  • @devsaranga
    @devsaranga6 жыл бұрын

    13 people don't have the Calculus needed.

  • @sergiohuaman6084
    @sergiohuaman60843 жыл бұрын

    Dr. Strang is the Chuck Norris of Mathematics.

  • @samb443
    @samb4437 жыл бұрын

    Low d high - high d low over low low ez

  • @FingerThatO

    @FingerThatO

    7 жыл бұрын

    Sam M your mom is easier.

  • @muhammadfaizanalibutt4602
    @muhammadfaizanalibutt460221 күн бұрын

    taylor swift series

  • @FiveEars
    @FiveEars4 жыл бұрын

    sounds terrible - what a waste of good content