Thank you for your excellent video. Do you have any experience with the Tamron 70-300mm SP Di VC USD lens? Considering this as a viable alternative to the Nikon 70-300mm for my d7100. Thank you

Thanks for all the videos! I appreciate the plethora of knowledge and experience that you share with us. So how is the 80 -200 in low light or a concert type situation vs the Tameron? Or is there something else you would recommend?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

80 200 is better in low light, it has a LOT less glass elemenets 18 vs 23 80 200 is a damn TANK, and $600 used all day long it NOT as fast as the tamron, nor has VR, but i need NONE of that ,........however many DO need fast action VR

Should I replace my 18-300 VR with two to include 80-200mm along with something else, am just a starter and wish go long into learning, please advise, really appreciate I have D7200

I just started taking pictures, i have a d3400 with a kit lens i have a whippet race dog and am wondering what the best tele lens is as of 1/2017 for zooming and fast lens. thanks .

Hi, i have a Nikon D 3100 and need a cheap lense to shoot planes flying [ like a mile away ] what would you recommend . great vid.

KEN!! Would this tamron work well with a 2x teleconverter as we discussed in the previous conversation? I would greatly appreciate your help!

How about the night concert photo? Would be Nikon 80-200 fine or the autofocus would be slow? Or should I try and hunt 70-200/2,8 VR I? Having issues sometimes with my AF-D 50mm/1,4. Still I really like the feel of AF-D lenses. Some nice old school feel there...

I picked up an AF-S 80-200 f/2.8 and I absolutely love it. Took me trading in two different ones with KEH to get one that consistently auto-focused, though. Bit of vignetting wide open, but it's nice and sharp, even on a modern 24 MP FX sensor.

what do you think of 80-200mm f/4 ais for landscape. i suppose not practical to use due to it being a zoom and a non-cpu lens. but its cheap and light and built as a saab...

Hi, I use nikon d7200 and nikkor 70-300 VR -4.5-5.6G. Is this good enough for airshow ?

I do have the Nikon 70-300VR and I love it! Got it off Ebay for about $300. But I sometimes would like to have something just a hair bigger for wildlife but I don't want to break the bank. My question is what is the quality of the Nikon 200-500 VR which sells around the $1300 range. Would it be worth having? Thanks. Duane

80-200 or 180 2.8 for wedding ceremonies? I prefer primes but Idk if ill need the versatility of a zoom. I work with a 35/85 combo.

I also think of those three lenses, the Tamron is the best choice for sports or auto photography...etc solely for it's auto-focus, but just want to know if suggesting it for it's VR/IS/OS support for moving objects was missing context, or if you had different testing experience.

Another great video! I've used my 70-300mm for years and it has never failed me. It once fell about 6 feet onto the hard floor and did not break :)

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

must have missed the front element.

Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 Is it suitable for Dx Nikon Camras?

I am considering the Nikon 80-400mm telephoto zoom lens in the near future. Primary use for this lens would be moon and sun photography including eclipses. It would be paired with the Nikon D7500 which I plan on upgrading to by Christmas. Thoughts and opinions about this lens??

I live in the UK so can you tell me the name of a Japanese site where I can buy the nikon 80-200, please

70-300vr is fantastic for my grandkids soccer games. I love the rendering. I turn off the vr as im shooting 1/1000s. Old video but saved me money in 2019.. I picked up mint copy $250. Thanks Ken

Just scored a 80-200mm 2.8 AF-S. No buyers remorse whatsoever after using it at Comic Con and seeing what it can do in low light. It's a keeper.

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

BluegrassDan glad UR happy with that awesome lens! :)

What is your opinion on the nikkor vr II 70-200 2.8? My only concern with the tamron is the weather sealing.

Has anyone used the 70-300 VR Nikkor on a Canon full frame? If so what adapter did you use? There seem to be loads of adapters for the older manual lenses, but what about these ones? I'll probably get the Tamron though.

I have Nikkor 18-300 VR f3.5-6.3 to use with my D7200, I am very new, having used Tokina 100mm f.8 (on your reco.), I have started disliking my 18-300 more and more, should I replace it with two lens? one being 70-300 VR plus something else, Please suggest,

What are your thoughts on Nikon's original 70-200 f/2.8 VR? I saw a used one today for about $1,300. I've heard it's pretty good, much better than the current VR version.

which is best affordable pair of lens for d5200 18-55 mm and 70-300 mm or 35 mm 1.8 g and 18-55 mm

Ken, Which up to 200mm f/2.8 zoom is best on a DX body? Please advice. PS Just saw your 500mm mirror Nikkor video and that one I’d definitely on my bucket list!

Obviously old post, but curious your thoughts on the newish 70-300 FX E lens assuming a used price of $375, good value? I cant/wont carry a heavy lens when I travel and was curious.

Just bought the 80-200 2.8 on your recommendation after my older Tamron 70-200 needs repair. You recommended buying from Japan - oh my goodness, this lens looks BRAND NEW! And it actually came super quick, like 3 days! Thanks again!

Hi! how are you? what do think about 80-200 f2.8 Ed nikkor lens?

first thank you for the videos. second what dp u think of the nikon 80-200 AFS ? does it have the same optics as the D version ? and wha about the focus is it better ? third how come u never mentioned the nkon 28-70 2.8 ? how do u compare it to the newer 24-70 ? thank you

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Rudy Aoun same, its overpriced and over-rated, and hard to find. 28-70 2.8 nikkor is an old slow AF lens, its great, but its used price is INSANE and not worth buying, ive had one :P

Hi Ken, thanks for the continued useful insight and entertaining videos. Bought the 80-200 2.8 used based on this video (and love, love, love it). Question - have you ever experienced issues with customs buying lenses from Japan (delays or expenses)? Most of the interesting AP-recommended lenses on Ebay (from Japan) have the "customs disclaimer" on the listing. Thanks!!

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Maine SixString if you live in the US, you dont have any customs fees or issues, lenses from japan come DAMN FAST, most come in 4 days total shipped. customs BS is for people to worry about outside the US, they pay imports and other nonsense. :) nikon just raised the price on buying a new 80 200 2.8 :)

Have you tried the Tamron 70-300 VC can you compare it to the Nikon 70-300 VR?

Hi. Really enjoy your videos (I point people to them when they need an expert & honest opinion). Please carry on! Quick question: is the Nikon 75-300 AF F4.5-5.6 a good lens? Thank you!

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Ricardo Costa nope, that lens is a TURD :) thanks man

just picked up the nikon 70-300vr, eBay,new $389, loving your vids bro

Tamron AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD IF Macro Lens with Built in Motor for Nikon Digital SLR Cameras (Model A001NII) is this the Tamron in your video? I am looking for a good lens to shoot my son's football games Ps. I have the D90

well in market there are two 70-300 lens available one is manula and one is that you are showing . my question how much difference in between these to model in different ways . please answer thanks in advance difference between 70-300 manual and 70-300VR

This video is freeking hilarious!! Good stuff man!!!

Can the 80-200 f2.8 D be used for occasional macro photography? I know that it has a macro indicator but I believe the range is "outdated" today, from what it was back in 1997. Can I skip the excellent Tokina 100mm f2.8 Macro, for occasional macro with 80-200 f2.8 D? Or maybe the best question is: Can the Nikon 80-200 f2.8 D do any macro at all ???

Can you please give me the model number for the Tamron lens thanks and awesome video

@DixieDirtdraggers

6 жыл бұрын

Also is it compatible with a Nikon 5200

@eliasalerno8942

6 жыл бұрын

Dixie Dirt draggers yes it is compatible

I just ordered the 80-200 I hope it doesnt exhibit any focus breathing I might even try it with my kenko 2x for wildlife shots

Have any feedback about the Tokina 100 mm f/2.8 Macro, not only as a macro one, but olso in general as a tele?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Carlos Astorga feedback? sure, i have 4 videos on that lens as i recall. ......as both macro and tele, and portrait, FX or DX its just damn excellent, built like a tank, and cheap in price.

Hey there enjoy your videos i have a question i am shooting college sports for my college news paper i really want to the get the best telephoto for the money so would you recommend the 80-200 AFS or the 70-200 Vr1 or the tamron 70-200VC

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

***** easy answer, sports, save money......Tamron 70 200 2.8 VC on the VR1 and VRII, they both SUCK ASS :P dont buy them at any price. the 80 200 is awesome, but not fast enough AF for sports.......

I am new to photography and learning. I came across this lens for $550. Does this lens work on a Nikon D7500?

hey for rc racing at low light tomron or nikon?

Hi Ken. Good Morning. Congrats and Thanks for your great work. I am virtually addicted to your voice. :D By the way, old Nikon 70-210mm f/4 conspicuous by its absence. Is 70-300mm VR a better overall choice? And what's your opinion of Keh for used stuff?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Abhishek Dwivedi Ohhhh, my awful voice!!! Arghh. yes, the 70 300 VR is much better :) KEH is great, sometimes theyre high as hell, sometimes theyre very cheap, its odd those crazy loons.

Dude, I bought the 80-200mm and just received it today.. ended buying the push/pull version of it. WTF. Other than the push pull, what are the differences between the 2? I'm planning on returning it.

Dude. I would LOVE to see you after 5-6 drinks!! :)

@jan404404

7 жыл бұрын

Moto_rider maybe you just did

@bassman6231

5 жыл бұрын

yuck!

Is the Tamron lens for basketball photo for a FULL frame lens only??

I have the old 28-70mm f2.8 should I upgrade to the 24-70mm f2.8,is there a difference optically

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

sharpness no.

I just buy a Nikon d90 with 2 lens a Nikon Ed 80-200mm and a Nikon Dx 18-105mm with the bag and charger and card. For 600. I just want to know if I did good .? Thanks

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Sammy Fuentes you paid for the lens and got the rest for free :) sure thing

I have a Nikon D90 with 18-200. Not happy with the sharpness. Should I buy one of those?

@thunder7382

5 жыл бұрын

yes,a D700 and a 80-200

Hi Ken, Is the push/pull version of the Nikon 80-200 optically the same as the two-ring version? Thanks for the videos and recommendations.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+manish dayal yes, slow AF, nearly same, but a bad dust sucker

@manish1dayal

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis : Thanks.. the search for a two-ring version at a good price starts right now :)

I haven't been able to use any of these lenses, but I do want to purchase a telephoto around the 70-200, 80-200 range, and it's essentially come down to these two (the VRII is just too much). I shoot mainly concerts with ZERO intention of shooting sports or wildlife. The concerts that I shoot typically have pretty fast moving performers but I wouldn't put it at the same level of "action" as say a racecar track. Have you found the 80-200 autofocus to be great in terms of accuracy and speed in low light?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Peter Barnes 80 200 is not fast in AF period. but its wonderful for many other reasons.

Love the video.... And yer sense of humor is fuckin great ! Thanks fer sharin the video and the info. Have a great new year fella.... Thumbs up ! and ya have a new member LOL

I'm sorry I wasn't clear . will the lens on your video work with my camera ? for sports and action shots . if not , what do you recommend? and if so what model is it ? thanks

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+David Hill 80 200 2.8 is a screw drive, it wont AF on a D3000 or D5000 series what WILL? Tamron 70 200 2.8 VC, but its $1400

Hi Ken, the new 200-500mm 5.6E VR at $1400 seems too good to be true. What's your take?

Hey. Always enjoy the videos. I've flirted with this lens before, but last night at an event at my kids' school was kind of the last straw for me with the venerable 18-200. f5.6 and high ISO for fast enough shutter makes for bad telephoto pictures. I saw another parent with a f2.8 zoom and was envious of what almost assuredly were better pictures. I still dream of a scaled down camera bag and have been flirting with the idea of the new 16-80f2.8-4 and then the older 80-200f2.8. I have a suspicion about what you think of the newer 16-80 ;) but want your take. Is my dream of two lenses to slay all dragons reasonable? Oh, I have a D7100 (just for reference, I have the 35mm f1.8, 60mm f2.8, 85mm f1.8, all of which I rarely use because the reality is that I need the flexibility of zooms given my subject matter is most often my kids and their friends. they aren't waiting around to wait for me to change lenses. I also have the 12-24mm f4 which I love and would keep regardless). Thanks as always!!!

Can theme lenses be use in a crop sensor camera (D5300) ???

What's your thoughts on the AF-S version of the 80-200?

what do you think about tamron 70-200 2.8 non VC ??? is the glass have the same quality like tamron 70-200 VC, or better me choose the 105 f2. i shoot wedding

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

bazred satriani weddings REQUIRE a fast 70 200 (or 80 200) 2.8. Still recommend the VC 2.8 for about $800 used. its not worth messing with anything else except for the wonderful 80 200 2.8 Nikkor for $600 used

I just got the 70-300 non VR in a kit. I'm going to try it out for a bit but will probably sell it and pick up the VR version.

So if I am doing music photography, specifically in venues with a lot of flashing lights and very dark atmospheres and definitely need a fast lens at least at 2.8, can I manage to get by using a used mint 80-200 Nikkor until I can resell it to get a Tamron 70-200 when I have the money? Or is the autofocus and all going to be an issue? The bands I'd be shooting are usually pretty active and moving on stage, that's why I have some concerns.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+quintuag peeps on stage? not much movement, so the answer is yes. Ohhhh, rockers who always running back and forth ehhh? Ughhhhh. thats gonna be an issue on a tight budget. well the whole damn band isnt running back and forth one assumes. just the lead singer...... even then , surely not always running back and forth.

There are E & G versions of the 70 - 300 VR 4.5 - 5.6. Which is better in camera aperture control or an aperture ring?

@paganphil100

4 жыл бұрын

Roger Casas: I have the VR "G" version of this lens.....I've used it for many years with a Nikon D300s and now I use it with a Nikon D500 (both APS-C cameras). Despite it's relatively low price its an excellent lens and I can strongly recommend it.

Tamron 70-200 G2, Nikkor 70-300 VR - D810 or D500 ...perfect combination .. I love it ...

Considering buying a 80-200, however here in Denmark, the push/pull version is waaay cheaper than the newer version, is there any optical difference on those two iterations?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

yes, there is, but not a ton. Have someone in the USA buy it for you and ship it to Denmark! the newest D version is $600+ minty used on Ebay USA

Do you have a video about the 75 - 300 AF 4.5 - 5.6?

So am I right in saying that despite the slower autofocus and lack of VR, the 80-200 nikkor would be your recommendation over the tamron for wildlife shooting? Thanks

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Xavier Dean no, nor did i imply that in the video, for critters, the 70 200 2.8 VC

Can these 3 lenses fit in nikon d3400 or d3300 ??

How does the push-pull Nikkor 80-200 F2.8 compares to the nikon lens shown in the video

Hey man, what do you think about Tamron 70-200 f2.8 g2 vc? Congratulations for your channel. You rock!

the 17-50 Sigma has major AF issues on at least 50% of the d7200s BUT I lucked out works great for me. I love the full 2.8 and OS performance. 70-300 VR for long range.

Hey what do you think about 70-200 f4.

When you say, "order from Japan", what website do you recommend/trust? Thanks in advance for your consideration;) I'm very interested in the Nikon 80-200mm

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+bulltastik just anyones with lots of and good feedback from japan.

Have a line on an 80-200 push/pull and a non VC Tamron 70-200 for $300 and $400 respectively, and am trying to decide between the two. Is there a big difference between the push/pull and newer 80-200 nikon? Know of any difference optically between the VC and Non VC tamron that you know of?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Chinook Tools not a ton of diff no, non VC 2.8 tammy for $300??? check it and snag it

@ChinookOutdoors

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis Appreciate the input! The Tamron is the $400 one.

Hi Ken. Is the 80-200mm push pull worth buying? Is it very different?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+André Lousada it is worth its $340+ asking price yes, its tons O fun on the cheaps. :) ive owned 2 of em.

@andrelousada

8 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis thank you Ken! :)

Hi Ken, can I get some advice please. I have a 50mm 1.4 and a 300mm AF-S (On your recommendation). Im looking for a middle Zoom Lens to fill everything in between. What you would recommend? Should I go for the 70-300 circa $350 above or spend the extra money. Thank you

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

thats not a middle zoom, which would be like a 24-85 VR G nikkor

@kevinmccarthy7382

8 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the reply. I'm looking for a good quality lens that can take photos for me with the flexibility of the zoom. Or should I purchase a lens like the Tokina 100mm f/2.8? Thanks

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

photos of WHAT however?

@kevinmccarthy7382

8 жыл бұрын

Sorry I should explain better. I have a 50MM which I would aim to use more for indoor people based family shots. And then the 300MM which I aim to use for sports and wildlife. Essentially I'm asking what you would recommend as a third lens. Something ideally with a zoom so it gives me more flexibility. The utility lens e.g. if I can only bring 1 for whatever reason. Thanks for your help.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

yes, midrange zoom. something in the 35 to 80 range etc. 2nd importantly a wide zoom.

I'm glad I paid The only thing I dislike about the Tamron is it's tendency to front-focus. A +8 or more adjustment is required on my copy.

As an ultra versatile telephoto zoom I highly recommend the Nikkor 50-300mm 1:4.5 Auto if one doesn't mind manual focusing. Although there's lots of "evil" inside, the construction of this fine lens is awesome and it is a pleasure for street photography. Excellent handling and balance on a monopod! Great for perfect and accurate framing as this one slows you down a lot. The built quality is also marvellous, of course (70s!).

Is the Nikkor 80-200mm auto focus significantly slower than the tamron 70-200? I don't need a extremely fast autofocus, but it's important. I'm an aviation photographer. Also, are they both compatible with the D3200? thanks!

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+trainmanrisko yes, its slower, and ive said that often. D3200 cannot AF the D series lenses, so no.

@nostop2858

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis ok, thanks!

Hey man, is there such a thing as a teleconverter for the 80-200 that doesn't suck? I'd love to get some extra length out of this before cropping.

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

hey coffee baron!!!!!! that doesnt suck? LOL NO !!! ROFL !!!! did you get those pics i emailed you? if not, email neoplatonist@icloud.com buddy !!!! its like a 3rd world country down here for www !!!!

How does theNikon AF-s version compare to these. Is it worth the extra few hundred dollars ? Do you gain any more image sharpenss as compared to the lenses you feature here?

Really love your videos! Especially the Master Class. Now, i have the Tamron 70-300 and I really love it. I'm not an expert but I think It's a really sharp overall decent lens (for 300 euros). What's your opinion about it?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

well, id better not say. for LESS than $280 euros, you could have the 70 300 VR Nikkor minty used with less distortion and faster AF.

@PecorinoRomano

9 жыл бұрын

I appreciate the fact you have been gentle my first time... thank you for your suggestion, I'll try to make the deal :D

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

kind regards dear sir!

Theoria Apophasis please tell me what you think of the Nikon Ai-s Zoom Nikkor ED 50-300mm f4.5 Lens i have been looking through in all your videos if you even have mentioned it. Have you tried it? is it any good compared to these other telephoto zooms considering having the extra range?

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

Psalm Cabalteja yes, ive used same, its a gigantic insane brute. Its designer should be slapped senseless. its actually halfway decent, it should come with a monopod, its a crude beast.

which one would be best for portrait ?

Hey Theoria, First of all thanks for the time you take to make all these videos. I was wondering what your opinion is on the push-pull version of the 80-200 2.8 . The focus might be a bit slower than the 2-ring version you got there in the video, but I read it had similar IQ and since it's about 50% cheaper wouldn't that make a nice budget option on a "fast" lens? Sure, it wouldn't be great for sport photography, but you already mentioned the Tamron should be a better choice over the Nikon because of its focus speed.

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

push pulls are stinkers, and they suck in dust too. Its OK, but theyre tons for sale for a reason. If you can snag one for about $225+ its 'worth it' but dont pay much more !

@torp747

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis Makes sense, Thanks a lot for the info and keep up the good work buddy!

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

thanks for kind words!

I'm just starting in photography and want to do some high school sports, can I get away with using the 70-300 vr until I can purchase the tamron?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Sean Sutton the VR G version?? there are MANY diff 70 300 versions, not all are great/good

@seanb580

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis the ED VR version that you showcase in the video

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

thats the VR G version

@seanb580

8 жыл бұрын

So good for sports then?? Thanks for your advice. I enjoy your videos and honesty

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

super fast AF, yes indeedy

do you have an opinion on the 70-200 vri not the vrii? It's around 1,000-1,100 on ebay, about the same price as the tamron vc on ebay.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Joel Williams the tammy is better

THE 80 200 is here: www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Camera-Lenses/AF-Zoom-Nikkor-80-200mm-f%252F2.8D-ED.html

@ashishyadav-oe6ip

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis : thanks for lens information , you been so great mentor ... how is Nikon Zoom-Nikkor Auto 80-200mm f/4.5 AI Manual .. Is it worth lens

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

that lens isnt worth it unless you find it DIRT cheap :)

@ashishyadav-oe6ip

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis : I was planning to buy for 30$ , but now i'll take your words and will drop the idea as its not worth .. and Happy to see your response .. this is first time ever I commented on youtube :)

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

first time ever ehhhh? :) warm hugs

@badreddine495

8 жыл бұрын

is it with autofocus ?

How do you feel about the Nikkor 70-200mm f4?

Hi, Ken. Good morning. I got the 80 200 2.8 following your advise, but I got 2 big issues (please correct me if I'm wrong). 1. Softness at 2.8. I tested this lens at different light conditions and it's too darn soft. It's almost useless. Why would I buy a huge lens like this without being able to use it at 2.8? I got it for wedding photography and portraits and it's kind of useless for that purpose. I tested it on long distances (about 10 m) at 200 mm in a d7200. 2. Out of focus. The softness might be caused by the focusing system. On the same tests I did at long distance only one out of 30 pictures or more was sharp. Yeah, the glass is almost great but does it matter if the picture is still blurry? On the other side, I tried to do the micro af adjustment but no matter what value I put, it just doesn't affect the pictures. Some people is saying this is because of the way the lens is build. So, back to my doubt: does it really worth to still buy this lens or going for the Tamron 70-200 2.8 (more expensive)? The version I got is older than yours in the video (yours has the AF distance switch, the one I got has a manual ring). I had to pay a lot of money for returning it to Japan.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

if you were using the lens at 30 feet or less, focus breathing yes, Nikon warns users this is not a close quarters lens you returned it already? :( Grrrr

@daviddevita

8 жыл бұрын

Hi again, Ken. I know you've been sick, so don't worry if you don't reply shortly. Thank you for your time. Back to your question, yes, I sent it back to Japan. I tested it at 2.8 in short and long distance, and the back focus issue was every single time. In fact I was only able to get 3 sharp shot (at 30 ft) out of 95 at different focal distances. I've been spending some time reading the pdf manual you provided. It indicates that its minimum focusing distance is 1.8 m (6 ft) and in Macro mode 1.5 m (4.9 ft). I performed different tests (focal distance x 50, use a tripod and do micro AF adjustments), then calculate the sweet spot using the upper and lower values. But none of the micro AF I used was affecting the outcome, reason why (I was explained) this lens is dis-calibrated, there is nothing I can do to make it work. This is not meant to work with micro AF adjustments because it has double ring focusing system, they also say at dpreview.com. I have not had any of these issues with any other lens I have, like the 35 mm. I understand this might be 'solved' using 3.5+ apertures, but that is not the purpose I got if for: I want it for portraits mainly and weddings. If I just cannot use it at 2.8 then I prefer to pay a little more for a Tamron which is sharp at 2.8. On the other hand, I also purchased the 35-70 2.8 D. It is not 'sharp as hell' but it has better results, in fact my 35 mm DX 1.8 G is sharper at 1.8. I found this issue with the 50 mm 1.8 E (manual) which you also recommend in other video. Why you think this is caused? is it because is an older lens? If the reason is just stupidity, please just say it, that will be fine. Sorry for the long writing. Thanks again and hope you feel better.

@salvadorvetaphotography8326

7 жыл бұрын

If you are trying to shoot at f2.8 to avoid ISO noise, I recommend you to learn how focal length affects depth of field and vice versa.

Hi there, I'm currently looking to buy a lens primarily for wildlife, but at the same time good for a bit of moon/star gazing, landscape, concerts and.. well a bit multi-purpose I guess. I'm currently leaning towards the Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR, but I can't seem to find much people using this for wildlife. Would it do the trick or am I missing something important about wildlife that makes this lens not that good of a choice? What would you recommend? My budget would like me a lot if I paid 700$ max for it. Thanks!

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

70 300 VR is an excellent lens, have 2 of them. as for moon gazing, id say NOPE the lens is $300 minty used EBAY. avoid the NON-VR (due to inferior glass, slow focus, etc etc) 70 300 which are , of course, cheaper.

@fbtwitzmc7149

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis so, which lens is right for moon gazing??

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

which level of moon gazing??? landscapes including moon shots, or actual MOON SHOTS as in zooms? a 300mm 2.8 (pricey!!!!) would be best without spending an EXTREME fortune.

@fbtwitzmc7149

9 жыл бұрын

just a moon shots in zooms :) so.. it is 300mm 2.8?? well thanks for fast respond.. love your videos..

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

well, id recommend a 800mm Nikkor, but i doubt you or many others wanna blow $15,000+ on a lens ! 300mm is perfect.

The AF-S VR 70-300mm costs twice as much as the AF non-VR D ED or G. Apart from the VR, what's the difference, how are they worse, are they still usable?

Thank you so much for your assistance in purchasing a new lens for my Nikon d7200, which was the Nikon af-s VR zoom nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 if-ED lens at $319.00. I also had purchased a Nikon 70-300mm AF Nikkor 1:4-5.6 G before I saw your awesome video about "lens secret to save you $$."

Just bought a 80-200 for 500. I did sell my 70-300 VR for 300, pretty much in mint condition like you said.

@mahdivhd8490

4 жыл бұрын

Any problem with action with that 80-200?

Still rocking my 80-200 f2.8 push pull haha.

@videos1692

5 жыл бұрын

Hi D Designed, I just bought a 80-200 f2.8 push/pull. Are they good?

Think I will pick up the 70-300 VR G for my D700, seems to fit the bill for me, as I don't want to spend so much for sporadic use and don't need 2.8 aperture.

@boatman222345

4 жыл бұрын

I've used the 70-300 on my D700 and it works well. Overall I've been quite impressed with the quality of images produced with this relatively inexpensive lens. That said I do miss the extra "reach" of my crop sensor D7100 which is the body I most commonly use this lens on when photographing wildlife. That said another video on the Angry Photographer's channel makes a pretty strong case for using the DX mode on full frame bodies when using this lens. As he points out you are not really gaining "reach" on a crop sensor body you are just projecting the same image circle on a smaller sensor...which in effect can be duplicated by enlarging the D700 image in Lightroom.

@RCFunEveryday

4 жыл бұрын

Good points, I don't think I'd need to be in dx mode, simply because most stuff I will shoot will be about 70-150 I'd guess, but for the stuff when I need longer, it's what's making me think about going that route.

Have you compared the Simga/ Tamron 70-300 to the Nikon model? Are the much worse? They are a lot more affordable and I would like a telephoto lens for my FX camera.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Thilo Be yes, no comparison.

I want to get deeper into photography. I have a rather small budget of about $600-$700. Where should I start? I was thinking about getting a D5300 off of ebay (one of those bundles) and then buying the 35mm af-s f1.8 prime lens to go along with it. I will be mainly shooting stills and scenery in both day and night.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+ReggaeDubSoundSystem better buying a refurb D7100 and a couple lenses :)

@WrongFromWright

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis Thanks for the fast reply. What lenses would you recommend?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

for what use, what budget for lenses?

@WrongFromWright

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis Mostly photos of vehicles. I go to alot of car shows. Some scenery as well. Honestly, $700 was my maximum for both a body and lenses.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

that only leaves $200 for lenses 60mm 2.8 D AF covers all of that its $200 used

hello ken if you had a 70-300mm vr would you get any real benefit purchasing the 80-200mm apart from the f2.8 aperture

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

doug davies the 80 200 has diff image results, richer, creamier, and its just about the perfect wedding lens. for MOST , the short answer is no, but specifically yes. its a DAMN heavy lens too, some people hate messing around with such lenses what are you gonna shoot with it?

@dougdavies1089

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis the cheapest i see is the push pull type but dont fancy them at all cant afford new just bought the d7100

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

most of the D series 80 200 are about $600 but its one giant heavy fat tank of a girl! arent you loving the D7100 ? :)

@dougdavies1089

9 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis yes ken its great i had a great buy £450 brand new it may be an import but i'm a happy chappie still takes the same brill photo's as the £800 one but i only get one year as for the 70-300vr i would'nt part with it anyway if i bought a 80-200mm its a great lens

@kathodosdotcom

9 жыл бұрын

450 pounds new ehh? awesome :)

I just got the Nikkor af 80-200mm, so far so good, I am enjoying it! March 28th 2024, I paid 250 USD it came from Japan and it looks like new!

Please tell me, what about Nikkor 80-200 F2.8 AF-S (1999-2004 version)? Is it beteer than this 80-200 F2.8 D? Thank you! :)

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Eve Iasi AF-S is a bit better, and bit more reliable. but costs good bit more 🇺🇸