I'd like to flesh out the idea of what I call the "stimulist" movement in art. It's the equivalent of loading a piece with so many sparkles and sprinkles that the subject matter is barely relevant and more often than not SHAMEFUL. I believe this is a psychological phenomenon. Art like this would include things like "cutesy Satan" and traditionally ugly subjects being plastered with glitter and rainbows to validate the underlying subject. Interested to hear your thoughts on this category if you have time. Disguise and dazzle camouflage are related concepts that are prevalent. Zebras.

nice pirikeet ALso i uninstalled twitter from phone from many of the reasons said. It was feeding me perpetual doom and dread. All based in reality and projection, yet, it was affecting me to the point I could not arise a figment of positivity in my daily routine. In the end that figment of positivity still has more of a chance aganist an unfair world than all the justified dread. At least when facing it alone.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

That’s a smart idea. Put that shit down. Work on your own development. ❤️

sorry for the annoying comment, man. there's undoubtedly good people out there ..was only speaking from my narrow experience. i'll take your advice on looking for better work more often. always good vids.

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Nahh... it's all good and in good fun. I found your comment largely spot on! 😉

@donnietobasco4526

10 ай бұрын

I felt like it was a fascinating comment and it made for a good title (why I clicked the video instead of doing something else.) I am trying to deconstruct the viewpoint of artists having morals that could be describe as vile and misguided. I won't harp on that exact terminology, but I think the point is clear: those with "artistic independence" have a set of morals that do not align with your own, or with the world as a whole. Most people's morals and beliefs are translations or reflections of their bank account or their parents' bank account. Few people hold beliefs and morals that are principled by experience and careful reflection and introspection. Well, maybe not "few people". But certainly not the majority of folks. This is because it takes a tremendous deal of energy, effort, and opportunity to develop radical ideas and reflect on the systems around you that created you. I wonder how the independent artists you speak of measure up to this idea? Or I guess I wonder how their morals and your morals compare and contrast with their experiences and yours? I'll give you a wild example. Many years ago I was working a dead end job with really no idea of self-identity, self-actualization, or creation. I thought I only really had the ability to destroy. Yet one of my wives' friends' husband was a successful photographer. He had shot the cover of magazines and made a living as a successful artist. For no real reason at all, not knowing him, I had extreme contempt for him. I assumed he was immoral and radical and strange. I had probably met him once and really knew nothing about him. Many years later I would get into photography and design (thanks to Elliott). Now I have the complete opposite view and that man and I view each other as contemporaries. While my other life goals do not involve making a living as an artist, I wish to make excellent work as stated in the video. The only thing that changed was me. It took a few years and some fortunate (and unfortunate) life experiences, but I now know what it means to express my creativity and examine the world around me in a critical and compassionate way. From everyone's point of view, they are generally the good moral person. Rather than admonish individuals around you, closely examine the systems and worlds in which they dwell and came from. Hopefully this isn't too much of a mindless ramble. Also I forgot to explain why I think the biggest reason I disliked that guy: he was the closest I had then come to an independent artist and I resented him for being able to see beauty in the world that I could not. I resent him being celebrated for it while I worked my dead end job.

one way to use social media in a positive way is to use it creatively like make it more like your art , how many social media sites/websites do you see that look just alike nothing interesting/new/creative

Thanks Elliott ✌

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

No worries!

I'm a runner too haha Good video!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Awesome! Thank you!

Thanks!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Yo... a thousand 🙏 (sincerely)

Individualism comes from egalitarianism and teaches that a person is defined by the things that they have in common with the rest of humanity; the things that make people equal. The "individual" is, therefore, an atomized unit broken down to his most basic form, because the things that make everyone equal are the things that are the most insignificant. This unit is then free to choose their social, economic, political, religious destiny. Later on, people start to choose their gender, their race, and even their age and it won't be long before they begin to opt out of humanity itself (transhumanism). This is the concept of freedom according individualism and it is a detriment. Freedom use to mean the exact opposite of this; that you actualize your full potential within the bounds of a level in the hierarchy (Dharma) through authority and discipline.

Is Reggie around? Can we get some Reggie in the back ground of a video?

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Your wish is my command... (stay tuned my dude)

Good vid

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

Thanks!

Thanks!

@StudioPractice1

10 ай бұрын

My dude.👊