Watched this because I am homeschooling my soon-to-be-13 year old daughter. We are going over the Civil War and Reconstruction.

Watching this in May 2023 as we’re staring at a Debt Ceiling crisis. Invoking the 14th Amendment was one option on the table. To anyone in the future reading this, I hope all pans out, but as of now we have no idea what’s going to happen.

@KevenTomlinson

Жыл бұрын

Checking in. 5 hrs later. No change in the “news” as of now. 😁

@zeldapro18

Жыл бұрын

Interesting how I "randomly" came onto this video. Pure coincedence for sure.

@donaldrayprine5153

Жыл бұрын

There is a tentative deal, now it has to be voted upon in the house and Senate, then signed as well

@donaldrayprine5153

Жыл бұрын

1 report was it was a 2 year deal

@gjdewald

Жыл бұрын

The 14th amendment to raise the debt ceiling. Are there still Democrat slave owners trying to get reimbursed for Republicans freeing their slaves?

In Article 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, you seem to have glossed over something. Seemingly, being born in the US would automatically make one a US citizen, conveniently ignoring the fact the it clearly states "being subject to the jurisdiction thereof". You mentioned native Americans not getting citizenship this way, presumably because they would be born on Indian lands (reservation) and not "in the US". However, offspring of foreign diplomats aren't automatic US citizens similarly, but because their parents are not subject to jurisdiction of US laws. Fast forward, illegal aliens born in the US, don't (or shouldn't) get automatic US citizenship, because their parents are still subjects of the laws of the original country. Yes, they aren't diplomats with immunity to US laws, but they aren't automatically subjects to all but immigration laws.

@donaldrayprine5153

Жыл бұрын

There is a provision for Native Americans, and Diplomats as well

@stephenkingsley5815

Жыл бұрын

@@donaldrayprine5153 Really? I have never heard of the offspring of diplomat becoming citizens of the host country. As far as Native Americans goes, yes, but that was a separate act of Congress following World War 1.

@charlesbaker1628

Жыл бұрын

Subject to the jurisdiction refers to a person born with allegiance to a nation. It has nothing to do with obeying laws. A "Natural Born citizen" is someone that is born with full and complete allegiance to a nation. If both parents are U.S. citizens then you are Natural Born, If one parent is a citizen, then you are a naturalized citizen. This is the original intent of the clause , and the one we are Constitutional required to follow, even though our government tends to ignore it .

@Jbickley00

Жыл бұрын

If you are born in the US, you are a citizen. This is different than most other countries and that’s a good thing.

@stephenkingsley5815

Жыл бұрын

@@Jbickley00 How and why, is that a "good thing"? Let's have a cadre of North Koreans come in and raise an army of citizens as soldiers to wipe out America? Good idea. NOT!

RN to BSN and watching your videos for a required Government class. At first I hated the idea of this dry old stuff but the last 4 years have taught me I really should know the constitution so much better than I was never taught 50 years ago. So, thank you for making this so palatable and interesting.

I meant through my vids, lol. but you can always tweet me! or better yet, go to HipHughes History on FB!

Thank you so much for making this accessible. I feel more prepared for my public policy class today!

You're awesome. These videos are a huge help. Thank you!

You help so much with my constitutional law class; very easy, simple and basic breakdowns.

Sounds like a great topic for a lecture on Federalism, I'll put it on the DJ list. Thanks!

Good video. Thanks for recording this!

Thanks for this video! I just ordered some Hip Hughes merch.

Studying for my police academy, trying not to ignorantly violate rights.

@povljr

4 жыл бұрын

Jesus, man. Good luck to you. Things are NOT cop friendly these days. And I commend you for putting in the work.

@VO_Lego

4 жыл бұрын

@@povljr Thank you!

@MarketCon-Artist

Жыл бұрын

The department will urge you to violate rights

@robertgrunenwald

Жыл бұрын

Don't worry you'll figure it out the day you graduate you'll become just like the rest of the scum bag police

@ammo1033

Жыл бұрын

We need good police officers! Good luck to you.

I love your videos you are helping get through my American government college course I LOVE YOU THANK YOU! lol

@hiphughes

7 жыл бұрын

Awesome! I am glad you found them and they found you.

Mr. Hughes, amazing! Your energy level is fantastic! I have always been a student of math and science until recently I have wanted to go back and revisit history. Your videos are a fantastic journey into history indeed. Thank you so very much for posting these videos, and thank you for contributing to the most important job in the world, teaching. Thank You!

Here's a question in short it basically says you can't make a law for one person that doesn't apply to all.. so how does that work take you get a ticket for not wearing a seatbelt but school buses don't have them public transportation doesn't . Even the police that write the ticket don't have e to wear them . So that is an example of making laws that only apply to certain people

Wish I hadn't wasted so much time yesterday watching Dr. Phil and baby kittens sleeping vids yesterday when I could have been watching yours.

Love the house of learning! New subscriber.

Thank You For The Information Of History Rock On 🇺🇸🤘🏻👨🏼‍🎓

Great video Thanks

Thanks! Love ya!

The advertisement said firming cream? I'm 64 years old now, and I am NOT WRINKLED,because I drank my apple juice everyday for 30 years, like I'm supposed to. My face and neck are so firm, and SO TIGHT, they can't get any tighter.

@redtandem8483

24 күн бұрын

Tight !

7:06 STOP YELLING AT ME!!!😭

thanks!!! Iuse your videos for my French students, it's cristal clear!!!!

@hiphughes

9 жыл бұрын

Merci! Merci!

hey great video🥃 could you do one on " the battle of Athens " .. thank you

I would say I am closer to you then you think although I am sure my paradigm is static in some western context. I appreciate your honesty and intellect and look forward to your future comments.

@povljr

4 жыл бұрын

Does anyone know what comment Hip was responding to?

Among several key omissions, owing, I presume, to the need for brevity, two stand out: mention of Barron v. Baltimore, which restricted the application of the Bill of Rights to the Federal Government; and the Slaughterhouse Cases, in which the Supreme Court actually first addressed the scope and validity of the Fourteenth Amendment and provided the legal precedent on which Cruikshank would rely.

@hiphughes

5 жыл бұрын

Good news is is I do have videos of them. The hard part is deciding how deep to dive Knowing that the majority of my students are just trying to wrap their heads around the idea. I do appreciate the comment. If you go to my channel page you will see a link to my video index

Always enlightened

Can anyone point me to a passage explaining the rights of parents under constitutional rights? Currently dealing with a case where an abducted child has been in foster care and the foster agency failed to notify me in a reasonable amount of time. They took over 15 months which is as far as i can see a breach of a fathers rights.

Huge fan! Mad props. :-)

@hiphughes

7 жыл бұрын

+Amanda Magdalena thanks Amanda for the wonderful comment! You best be subbed and be sure to spread the virtual word

@amandamagdalena5095

7 жыл бұрын

I teach U.S. History and my kids love you!

Cheers from England.

Is the fourteenth amendment also used for corporate personhood and thus contributing to the Citizen United decision?

Hi Mr. Hughes do you have any hints to better understand the State Action Doctrine?

So thank you for posting this video, I’m not a young person anymore, I’m not currently enrolled in any courses covering the constitution & so I am wondering do you think the 14th amendment is applicable when cops shoot unarmed people & then they use something called qualified immunity to basically inoculate themselves from prosecution! I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts about that & again thank you for posting video!😎

@JustT0m752

2 жыл бұрын

It largely depends on the circumstances the police officer is faced with. An officer in Ohio saved a young woman's life by shooting Ma'khia Bryant, who was in the process of stabbing someone. If however, the police officer is found to have acted criminally then they face a trial and could very well spend the remainder of their life behind bars.

@oliverduke1173

2 жыл бұрын

cops should not shoot armed people either. please don't use this cliche

@theodorehaskins3756

2 жыл бұрын

@@oliverduke1173 Touché! So with all due respect, I wasn’t talking about armed people, and I understand your point, but we know the majority of the people whose cases end up in the news, never end up in court, and when they do it is likely that this particular SCOTUS decision of qualified immunity is used broadly as a common defense, and we also know that the subjects in these cases were not carrying firearms, and were not pointing a firearm at the police, in fact a lot of these cases involving situations so egregious that the subjects weren’t just walking away, they were running away out fear of the police! So this isn’t about a cliché, it’s about life, and death, and whether or not the rule of law has any real meaning or standing in the general scheme of things, and as we all should know that life is a lot more dangerous when people have lost faith with those entrusted with their safety, e.g. the cases of 12 year old Tamia Rice, and Breonna Taylor remains prominent in my mind as to just how messed up things are in this country where judges are likely to rule in favor of qualified immunity even in cases where the facts show otherwise, and because of the prejudicial nature of such a decision, it makes an appeal unlikely to result in a reversal. Comphrende!

Question, who and what party where the SC Justices put into /on the fort by? Back in 1886 or what ever date you said

I thought I was. I'll tell you what Ill meet you on my homepage any time you are free.

your awesome dude and you remind me of squid from the show rocket power

So I'm crazy on the Internet. Okay, I'm fine with that, as long as I have access to your videos. Could you make videos about the differences between US politicla system and others?

Došao sa mudjinog klipa.

love this

Keith Hughes needs to watch the 14th Amendment as explained by the Institute for Justice. The 14th Amendment was needed because in the early 1830s, the Tanney Supreme Court opined in Baron v. Baltimore (courts opine. Tyrants issue rulings because they rule) that Article 4 Section 2 of the US Constitution because the US Constitution does NOT apply to the states & gives no power to the US Federal gov't to force the states (or counties or cities or other political subdivisions) to protect the rights, privileges or immunities of the people/citizens of the USA. The Dred Scott is connected but the problem was that the scumbag Tanney Supreme Court's ruling in Baron v Baltimore that gutted the US Constitution.

What is the message associated with the hair? What do you tell the batter? “Here try these mushrooms, they are good on pizzas”.

broooo i was studying at 2 am and that 3:43 sound effect scared the crap outta me

Question...How can the 14th be invoked in a lawsuit against a state by one of its' citizens if the eleventh protects them?

Even the gnome in the back ground prefers half & half in coffee no sugar

You and Tom Arnold are twins I swear

@kahgritty5643

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂

Biden needs to use this now

In reference to map versus Ohio., the 11th amendment states that you can't sue the state that you reside in.

I was hoping that this explanation of the 14th Amendment would at least expand on the argument over whether or not children born to illegal immigrants should be protected by this amendment.

@masonbrown9846

2 жыл бұрын

I don’t know why you would need that explanation when the answer is clearly said

@Inspired2Teach

Жыл бұрын

They are not US Citizens because they are not born under the jurisdiction of the USA. They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country. they can be summoned back to their homelands and conscripted into military service. They have recourse to the embassy of their home country for the redress of grievances. According to the authors of the 14th Amendment, "subject to the jurisdiction" means the complete jurisdiction. The first act of an illegal alien/AKA "invader" entering our Republic is an affront to our Laws which they willfully break by entering our country illegally: a clear declaration that they are NOT subject to our laws.

I bet $50 he records in his shorts or underwear 😂

Why did you skip section 4?

@twodogs716

3 жыл бұрын

@Ned Bazinga Got THAT Right!!!

@scolley0616

3 жыл бұрын

The canceling of the Confederate Debt was very significant.

@rickjames3066

3 жыл бұрын

this guy went on a rant and forgot i guess...

good job

can you do a video on the incorporation of rights through the 14th amendment ?

@johnhumphrey9953

4 жыл бұрын

Most of the rights in the Bill of rights have been applied to the States via the 14th Amendment. Here is an interesting fact, the Supreme Court has refused to except poor people as a class that needs to be protected under the 14th Amendment. That is why the race card has to be used all the time, or that is why the race card is used all the time by the Democrats. Title 42 U.S.C section 1983 does not state that the action have to be racially motivated to violate the rights of the people secured by the Constitution and Laws, nor does the 14th Amendment use the word race, Yet, the Court refuses to change its view that it is unconstitutional to discriminate based on wealth or the lack of wealth.

@sosa7k169

Жыл бұрын

@@johnhumphrey9953 Appreciate the knowledge, that’s funny.

@johnhumphrey9953

Жыл бұрын

@@sosa7k169 it is not funny, it is a fact. the race card came from the Democrats objecting to the ratification of the 14th amendment on the grounds that it would give blacks the same rights as whites. read the congressional globe and learn what they the Democrats say while in office.

@sosa7k169

Жыл бұрын

@@johnhumphrey9953 I was agreeing with you. Have a good one and thanks 🙏🏾

@andrewvelonis5940

Жыл бұрын

I was thinking along the same lines; the incorporation clause.

Those are two separate genres. Dr. Phil does not sleep with baby kittens. Sigh, the internet: This is how rumors get started.

hip, what science teachers do you recommend?

Age 38 2014 Enterprise Down the 14th path, freedom? Since 8 years old?

This is music to my ears

Do you think congress will use section 4 to remove the members that helped the insurrection on Jan 6, 2021?

Hey Hughes, can you do a video on why government is involved in marriage?

It doesn’t matter what the constitution says. This Supreme Court says , I will tell you what it says.

These videos are awesome, love gnome chomsky I get the joke =)

@multuminparvo5

8 жыл бұрын

+Max Windley Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! GNOME, not Noam. I couldn't figure that out without your help. lol...thanks for providing clarity to us confused youtubers.

@jamesbrice3267

5 жыл бұрын

Trollhunters made it mainstream.

LEGAL, Education, Medical, etc🤣

I am not an American but I have to watch this movie for assignment.

Crazy with the cheese whiz

Mapp was 29 years old= not older woman. She was young when arrested.

What about section 4 of the 14th Amendment? Completely skipped that part! Great videos, though!

@razis1972

3 жыл бұрын

Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment says, “…neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.”

@firefire7529

3 жыл бұрын

Basically, The USA is not responsible for confederate war debts.

@oliverduke1173

2 жыл бұрын

@@firefire7529 and sanctuary cities

@Spyrit2011

Жыл бұрын

@@firefire7529 The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

7:01 R.I.P Headphone users.

@edwardh3020

2 жыл бұрын

I know right.

No physical address can’t fish or hunt or buy a gun ! 2 - 4 -14 Amendments?

So how is the 14 Ammendiment going to help the Dept Ceiling. Sounds like Jabberwocky

"...racist children..."? What the heck!

Please give this a full listen: At around 2:30 and on, the narrator talks about how Section 3 dealt with disallowing this who had participated in the Civil War as a punitive measure. That this is from 11 years ago is critical, as it objectively shows people have always had the correct understanding as to the 14th Amendment. Crucially, it does not encompass or contemplate any future insurrection or rebellion, as there are other provisions in the law that deal with such. Section 3, of the 14th Amendment which has been in the news of late cannot be used to disqualify President Trump. That is the short and simply truth.

I just declared myself a US national

like that was a coincidence.

I though they decided corporations had freedom of speech and that comes from the corporate citizenship interpretation of the fourteenth. Money = freedom of speech was also an interesting interpretation of the first amendment too.

I’m definitely a Gnome Chomsky fan!

My question is what is the “due process”

Dude you are fucking awesome!!!

How about vs mistresses does this apply too?

this was uploaded 9 minutes ago, the walking dead ended 10 minutes. Awesome timing indeed.

@hjjhuj7401

3 жыл бұрын

this comment is ancient

How is state income tax legal? They are taking property without due process or just compinsation

@jayo552

4 жыл бұрын

@@YahwehhasgivenaservanttoHis 1040 INCOME TAX IS PAID TO QUEEN OF ENGLAND, NOT THE U.S.

The only aspect of the video I found irritating was the repetition of 'nevertheless'- otherwise it was perfect!

What if someone is born on a cruise ship carrying a British flag in international waters.?

I’m watching after watching Childish Gambino “This is America”

Birth (Person) + U.S (Corporation) = U.S. Citizen (Personal Property Of the Corporation)

@hiphughes

8 жыл бұрын

+Governor Wildstar KZread + Comments = Cray Cray Conspiracies.

@GovernorWildstar

8 жыл бұрын

The rEVOLution needs YOU!!! Join the Peoples Party Coalition TODAY! Google #PPC4Freedom

13th was ratified *after* he assassination of lincoln, not before (0:55)

"The racist children" haha

[But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and Void.] Explain this part.👈🏾

The why is hard, probably because states have used marriage as an organizing principle for thousands of years. The how, the evolution of it as issue in federalism seems interesting though. Your request in more of a philosophical video, seemingly you me to conclude it shouldnt be. Personally I probably agree with you at least in the idea of a state sanctifying love is quite creepy.

so want that have to do with risen the dete ceilling

Why no comment on debt ceiling clause in the 14th amendment?

Manhattan was purchased.

1. Entre - citizenship (protection by states), due process, equal protection of the laws 2. Correct 3/5 compromise - population and representation 3. Prohibits CSA leaders from being in congress 4. Congress can enforce these decisions

@ricardocarretero4705

4 жыл бұрын

protection by states? more like protection by constitution right?

@jeepien

Жыл бұрын

No, he skipped 4, and went right to 5.

I am crazy on the internet and stuck in a political wormhole on KZread LOL

Woah. Not on purpose. Sorry about that. Please send me the audiologist bill.

Skip to 0:45

Relevant rn

Or did you computer just fail to completely load. Refresh President of the Crocoduck Nation. Refresh! ok. I added them. And everyone should go check out Zaunstar's videos right now!

is this when we became citizens instead of we the people

Came here wondering what naturalized means

"Persons" that's a problem.

I have no problem giving Manhattan back to the Indians!