This is probably the largest number I will ever understand the growthspurt of

@pleasuretokill

8 ай бұрын

I forgot who did it, maybe it was CBC here but, I've seen some pretty good explanations of Tree and Loader. Loader is really crazy and I only understood the concept of how it grew but none of the actual "math". Busy beaver with the infinite light switch on and off explanation was pretty good also. The one I kind of still don't understand though is tree(3). The way it's explained it seems like it would just go on forever. The way it branches off looks like the "infinite" part would grow not decrease over time. But then again, I don't understand math this high so....

@tronskywalker3633

6 ай бұрын

@@pleasuretokill Best understanding i have which puts Graham and TREE in one sentence together is that they have somthing to do about embaddings of graphs. Wish someone could explain in details why embeddability is so out of scale when describing it

@soundcoremusicmix

4 ай бұрын

Maybe Hexation has to do w/ Graham's Number LOL! 😅

FINALLY AN ANOTHER BIG NUMBERS VIDEO

Yayyy a number video

The 9th hyper operation is enneation/nonation.

FINALLY THANKS

How can we show Heptation? I mean how we can find the difference between power and Heptation? Can you please tell me

@carbrickscity

5 ай бұрын

Same as how you find the difference between addition and multiplication.

@arlyndelossantos1786

5 ай бұрын

@@carbrickscity Multiplication is repeated addition, exponentiation is repeated multiplication tetration is repeated exponentiation, and so on and so forth

yep the method to calculate each could be used to make a sorting library in ai

if we quaNtify the number of binari cade in an apple smart watch ? Bof but on an aws server ? Ya this is usefull . Evennif we have manually build the index of each . Given hardware limits i would not index less or more then 5

Is the rest called nonation (9) and dexation (10)?

@carbrickscity

2 ай бұрын

Refer to Googology.

Very good explanation. Thank you very much. Finally i think i understand it. And i agree up to 4 arrows. But then i don't understand it. I think you changed the direction of the brackets at level 5: if you pause at 3:24 minutes in your viedo, where you explane 5 Arrows: from my point of view the mathematical brackets have to look all at he same direction, like the first one on the right side: the height of the first tower on the right side is 3 (arrow, arrow, arrow)3. The next tower on the left side has a height of the result on the right side; and therefor you have to make the braket also like this: ) Just like the first one. So you have )))) and not (((). The final horizontal bracket is correct again. Do you agree ? Again, what i mean is the principal how we have to use the brackets: correct is:: operation ) how often and NOT:: operation ( how often . You use this principal for the first 4 arrows and switch it at the 5. arrow.

@carbrickscity

15 күн бұрын

No those are not mathematical brackets. They are only used to show how many 3s in the thing next to it.

additition < multiplication < exponential < tetration < pentation < heptation < octation . If some were index table ? I bet ai would find use for them . What's the ai level ? Exponential non indexed

@carbrickscity

3 ай бұрын

Don't know what you mean.

When you say 7.6 trillion, are you saying the #3 is written 7.6 trillion times?

@carbrickscity

3 ай бұрын

Yes. A power tower of 3, 7.6 trillion levels high.

How about centation?! 🤔

@carbrickscity

4 ай бұрын

You can figure that out yourself.

@Easton_and_AI_calculates

4 ай бұрын

I think it is 100 arrows (A{100}B)

@user-rs5ps1rz5c

3 ай бұрын

​@@Easton_and_AI_calculates98

@Easton_and_AI_calculates

3 ай бұрын

@@user-rs5ps1rz5c Why 98 (a{98}b)?

@DJAZfake

10 күн бұрын

@@Easton_and_AI_calculates Because tetration is 2 arrows, pentation is 3 arrows, and so on. When you reach the so called “centation”, it will be 98 arrows.